Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Atomic binding corrections for high energy fixed target experiments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.12184 v2 pith:NDDEI7EU submitted 2024-03-18 hep-ph hep-exphysics.atom-ph

Atomic binding corrections for high energy fixed target experiments

classification hep-ph hep-exphysics.atom-ph
keywords correctionsatomicbindingelectronsenergyexperimentsfixedhigh
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

High energy beams incident on a fixed target may scatter against atomic electrons. To a first approximation, one can treat these electrons as at rest. For precision experiments, however, it is important to be able to estimate the size of, and when necessary calculate, sub-leading corrections. We discuss atomic binding corrections to relativistic lepton-electron scattering. We analyze hydrogen in detail, before generalizing our analysis to multi-electron atoms. Using the virial theorem, and many-body sum rules, we find that the corrections can be reduced to measured binding energies, and the expectation value of a single one-body operator. We comment on the phenomenological impact for neutrino flux normalization and an extraction of hadronic vacuum polarization from elastic muon electron scattering at MUonE.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Explicitly on-shell currents in relativistic mean field models

    nucl-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    The 'off-shell ambiguity' in relativistic mean-field one-body currents is spurious when currents are defined via free-nucleon operators; the correct mapping (Eq. 26) is parametrization-independent and requires time-li...