Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 88 references

Second-Derivative-Corrected FANPT for Robust Continuation of Nonlinear Wavefunction Equations

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Retaining the overlap Hessian makes FANPT continuation stable for nonlinear wavefunctions.

desk verdict A solid, honest incremental extension of FANPT—the Hessian correction improves continuation stability, but the benchmark protocol and missing code make the quantitative claims conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.11421 v1 pith:NDFD3HCS submitted 2026-08-11 physics.chem-ph

classification physics.chem-ph
keywords flexibleansatzforN-bodyconfigurationinteractionFANPToverlapHessiannonlinearwavefunctionequationscoupledclusteradiabaticconnectioncontinuationmethodprojectedSchrödingerequation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the original quasilinear FANPT approximation, which treats the wavefunction overlap as locally linear in its parameters, can become unreliable for nonlinear ansätze such as coupled cluster, and that retaining the second derivatives of the overlap fixes the continuation path. The proposed second-derivative-corrected scheme, called qao=3, neglects only third and higher parameter derivatives, so the same response matrix as before can be reused and the new terms enter only the constant vector of the response equations. On LiH and the BeH2 insertion path with seniority-restricted coupled-cluster wavefunctions, the scheme leaves final energies essentially unchanged but sharply reduces the same-λ deviation of propagated parameters from independently optimized ones, especially for large λ-steps and near difficult geometries. The claim matters because FANPT is used mainly to generate initial guesses for solving the nonlinear projected Schrödinger equations, and a more stable guess means fewer solver iterations and fewer catastrophic parameter excursions.

What carries the argument

The central object is the overlap Hessian, $\partial^2 f_m/\partial p_k\partial p_l$, the second derivative of a determinant overlap with respect to two wavefunction parameters, which the original quasilinear approximation set to zero. For coupled-cluster wavefunctions written as a product over excitation operators, each overlap is a sum over excitation paths, and the Hessian counts paths containing both differentiated amplitudes with their fermionic signs, while diagonal elements vanish. This Hessian builds the residual tensors $G_{n,kl}$, $G_{n,klE}$, and $G_{n,kl\lambda}$ that enter the FANPT constant vectors $B_n^{(r)}$. Because these terms appear only on the right-hand side, all orders share the same first-order response matrix as qao=2, so the correction changes the predictor rather than the linear system being solved.

What would settle it

Take the BeH2/CCSDT(2)Q(0) system, run both qao=2 and qao=3 with 10, 20, and 100 steps, and record the same-$\lambda$ Frobenius norms and the number of solver failures at each geometry; if the qao=3 advantage shrinks or reverses at fine step sizes, or if the large norms simply move to different $\lambda$ values, the claimed stabilization is limited to the coarsest steps rather than a property of the corrected predictor. Also check the condition number of the response matrix at the largest-norm points, since near-singularity would mean the norm reports parameter redundancy rather than poor guesses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that including the leading nonlinear response of the wavefunction ansatz—the second derivative of each determinant overlap with respect to the active wavefunction parameters—makes FANPT a noticeably more robust continuation method for nonlinear FANCI equations without altering the final energies. For coupled-cluster wavefunctions the overlap Hessian has a simple path-product form: a derivative of an overlap picks out excitation paths containing the differentiated amplitude, and second derivatives pick out paths containing both amplitudes, while diagonal elements vanish when an excitation appears at most once in a path. Feeding this Hessian into the FANPT response equations adds terms in $G_{n,kl}$, $G_{n,klE}$, and $G_{n,kl\lambda}$ to the order-dependent constant vectors, while the left-hand-side response matrix is unchanged. Numerically, qao=3 reduces the mean same-$\lambda$ Frobenius norm of the parameter correction from $1.26\times10^{-1}$ to $1.72\times10^{-2}$ for the 100-step LiH/CCSD(0) second-order run, and from 4.32 to 0.567 (maximum from 99.88 to 5.24) for the reduced-step BeH2/CCSD(0) run; the largest reductions occur at stretched geometries and at $\lambda$ near 1, where qao=2 produces excursions of order $10^2$–$10^3$ in the norm. The paper therefore concludes that the second-derivative correction acts as a stabilizing term for continuation, not as an energy correction: for linear CI the Hessian vanishes, and for the tested molecules the final energies differ from qao=2 by only about $10^{-7}$ hartree (LiH) or remain within the existing energy-error trends (BeH2).

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the independently optimized FANCI solution at each $\lambda$ is the right benchmark, so the same-$\lambda$ Frobenius norm measures the quality of the FANPT guess; this requires a unique converged FANCI solution at each $\lambda$ and treats every parameter as equally important, which may fail if the response matrix has near-zero eigenvalues or the nonlinear equations have several solutions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Linear CI wavefunctions see no change: the overlap Hessian vanishes, so qao=3 reduces exactly to the original quasilinear FANPT, making the benefit specific to nonlinear ansätze.
  • Larger $\lambda$-steps become usable: in the BeH2 tests, 10-step qao=3 runs attain mean same-$\lambda$ norms comparable to or better than 50–100-step qao=2 runs, while removing nearly all norms above 10.
  • Continuation becomes more predictable: the LiH runs show fewer function evaluations (1299 versus 1378 in the second-order case) and lower wall time (102.4 versus 118.2 seconds), even though final energies differ by roughly $10^{-7}$ hartree.
  • The response-matrix structure is preserved, so existing FANPT linear solvers can be reused; the added cost is one extra power of the number of active parameters in constructing the constant vector and storing the Hessian.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step is to include third-order overlap derivatives (qao=4) to see whether the stabilization saturates or reverses, since the constant-vector-completion pattern suggests the mechanism generalizes beyond the Hessian.
  • For geminal and tensor-network ansätze whose overlaps are also products or polynomial functions of parameters, the same Hessian construction should transfer directly, so the stabilization may be a general feature of product-form wavefunctions rather than a coupled-cluster-specific effect.
  • A sparse or symmetry-adapted overlap Hessian could lower the $\mathcal{O}(P^2)$ overhead identified in the scaling analysis, making the correction practical for larger active spaces where the dense implementation would be the bottleneck.
  • The same-$\lambda$ norm diagnostic could be complemented by measuring the basin of attraction or the number of Newton iterations required from each guess; if the Hessian correction reduces solver failures rather than just norms, the practical gain would be larger than reported.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a second-derivative-corrected FANPT variant, denoted qao=3, which retains the overlap Hessian for nonlinear wavefunction ansätze while neglecting only third- and higher-order parameter derivatives. The authors derive the corresponding second-, third-, and fourth-order response equations, implement the overlap Hessian for coupled-cluster wavefunctions in the FanPy/FANCI framework, and test the method on LiH and on the BeH2 insertion coordinate with CCSD(0) and CCSDT(2)Q(0) wavefunctions in the STO-6G basis. The central claim is that, especially for large λ-steps, qao=3 yields same-λ parameter vectors much closer to the optimized FANCI solutions than the original qao=2 approximation, suppressing large parameter-space excursions, while leaving final energies essentially unchanged.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the contribution is a useful practical refinement of FANPT: it includes the leading nonlinear overlap response without changing the response-matrix structure, and the authors are transparent about the additional O(MP^2) cost. The derivation is clear and the scaling analysis is explicit, and the paper honestly reports local degradations in addition to the favorable global trends. The main unresolved question is whether the same-λ norm is a reliable benchmark for guess quality, because the manuscript does not document the convergence thresholds, starting-point protocol, or root structure of the FANCI projected equations used as the comparison target.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results and Discussion, BeH2; Computational Details and Model Systems] The central diagnostic is the same-λ Frobenius norm between the FANPT-propagated guess and the 'independently optimized' FANCI solution, but the independence of the benchmark solutions is not documented. Since the FANPT prediction is described as providing the initial guess for solving the FANCI equations at the next λ, the reader cannot tell whether the benchmark optimizations used FANPT-independent starting points. Please report the residual convergence threshold used in the benchmark FANCI optimizations, the starting-point protocol (e.g., from RHF at every λ or from an explicitly FANPT-independent path), and a root-uniqueness or branch-continuity check for the projected equations at least at the geometries where qao=2 norms exceed 100 (r=3.0–4.0 and r=20.0). Without this information, the reductions of up to 10^3 in Tables 5, 7, 10, and 12 could reflect loose convergence or branch switching rather than improved initial guesses.
  2. [Computational Details and Model Systems; Tables 4–12] The number of FANPT continuation steps is not reported consistently. Table 4 is labeled 'reduced number of FANPT continuation steps' without giving the number, while Table 6 explicitly states '10 continuation steps'; similarly, Figure 4 discusses 10-, 50-, and 100-step runs for CCSDT(2)Q(0), but the mean and standard-deviation values for the 50- and 100-step runs are not tabulated. Please state the step count in every table caption and provide a table of the Figure 4 data so that the claimed cost–quality improvements can be verified quantitatively.
  3. [Computational Scaling and Continuation Quality] The practical benefit of a better initial guess for BeH2 is not demonstrated end-to-end. Figure 4 shows that qao=3 with 10 steps costs roughly 1.5 times more FANPT wall time than qao=2 with 100 steps, and no downstream FANCI optimization effort (function evaluations, iterations, or wall time) is reported for the BeH2 calculations. The paper should either show that the reduced same-λ norms translate into fewer nonlinear FANCI solves, or be explicit that the claim is limited to the parameter-space quality of the predictor rather than total computational cost.
minor comments (4)
  1. [TOC Graphic] The placeholder 'TOC ENTRY REQUIRED' remains in the manuscript and should be replaced with the actual table-of-contents graphic.
  2. [Throughout] The notation is inconsistent: the text uses 'qao=2' and 'qao=3', while Figure 4 and the scaling section use 'QAO=2' and 'QAO=3'. Please standardize the capitalization.
  3. [Table 4] The rows 'Mean parameter norm' and 'Maximum parameter norm' are identical to the 'Mean Frobenius norm' and 'Maximum Frobenius norm' rows, making the table redundant. If these are meant to be different quantities, the definitions should be given.
  4. [Computational Details and Model Systems] The manuscript does not provide a data availability statement or explicit software version numbers for PySCF and FanPy, and no numerical thresholds are given for the FANCI optimizations. Adding these details would aid reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the qao=3 correction is derived from overlap derivatives and benchmarked against pre-optimized same-λ FANCI solutions, not fitted to them.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained: the second-derivative-corrected FANPT equations follow by differentiating the projected residual (Eq. 11) and retaining the overlap-Hessian terms Gn,kl, Gn,klE, and Gn,klλ (Eqs. 20-22). No benchmark datum or fitted parameter enters the derivation; the qao=3 constant-vector terms are constructed from the CC overlap Hessian, Eq. (40), with no regression or tuning. The numerical claim is assessed by the same-λ Frobenius norm between the FANPT-propagated guess and the 'independently optimized FANCI parameters at the same value of λ' (Abstract and Computational Details). The paper states that these FANCI wavefunctions were first optimized independently, before FANPT propagation, so the benchmark is not a function of the qao=3 predictor. The self-citations to FANCI/FANPT (Refs. 61-62) define the framework but do not carry the new result: the overlap-Hessian terms, the modified response equations, and the numerical stabilization are derived and implemented in this work. The paper's honest reporting of local deteriorations, e.g., qao=3 giving larger same-λ norms near r=2.5, further indicates that the comparison is not manufactured. Concerns about convergence thresholds, root uniqueness, and shared FanPy implementation are correctness or reproducibility risks, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No empirical constants or new physical entities are introduced. The derivation relies on standard calculus, the FANCI projected-equation framework, and several domain assumptions about smoothness, invertibility, and convergence of the FANCI benchmark. The truncation order and step counts are visible methodological choices.

free parameters (2)
  • FANPT continuation step count = 100 for LiH; 10/50/100 for BeH2
    The claimed benefit is stronger with fewer steps; this is a user-chosen test parameter, not fitted to the data.
  • FANPT expansion order = 2 or 3
    The method is defined by truncating the λ-expansion at second or third order; the comparison is explicit.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Taylor expansion and Faa di Bruno differentiation of the projected residual are valid along the adiabatic connection.
    Used to derive the response equations (28)-(34).
  • domain assumption The adiabatic connection H(λ)=F+λV is smooth and differentiable on [0,1].
    Inherited from the FANPT framework; no analytic continuation issues are discussed.
  • domain assumption The response matrix G_{n,k} is nonsingular at every continuation point.
    FANPT solves linear systems at each order; singularity is not analyzed.
  • domain assumption The FANCI projected equations have a unique, converged solution at each λ, making same-λ parameter norms a valid diagnostic.
    The same-λ comparison assumes the optimized parameter vector is a faithful and unique benchmark; no convergence thresholds or degeneracy checks are reported.
  • domain assumption For the CC product ansatz, each valid excitation path contains a given operator at most once, so diagonal overlap Hessian elements vanish.
    Used in Eq. (41); standard for fermionic excitation operators but not proven for general cluster operators.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Second-Derivative-Corrected FANPT for Robust Continuation of Nonlinear Wavefunction Equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NDFD3HCS

@misc{pith2026260811421,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Second-Derivative-Corrected FANPT for Robust Continuation of Nonlinear Wavefunction Equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NDFD3HCS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11421}
}
abstract

We present a second-derivative-corrected extension of the Flexible Ansatz for N-body Perturbation Theory (FANPT) for solving nonlinear Flexible Ansatz for N-body Configuration Interaction (FANCI) wavefunction equations. The original quasilinear FANPT approximation neglects second- and higher-order derivatives of the determinant overlap with respect to wavefunction parameters. In this work, we retain the overlap Hessian and neglect only third- and higher-order parameter derivatives, thereby including the leading nonlinear response of the wavefunction ansatz while preserving the same response-matrix structure used in the original FANPT formulation. The resulting additional terms enter only through the constant vector of the response equations and are implemented for coupled-cluster wavefunctions in the FanPy/FANCI framework. The new approximation is tested on the Lithium Hydride molecule and the insertion of Beryllium into H$_2$ using seniority-restricted coupled-cluster wavefunctions in the STO-6G basis. The main advantage of the second-derivative correction is that it provides a better initial guess for solving the projected FANCI equations at the next point along the adiabatic connection. This improvement is diagnosed by comparing the FANPT-propagated parameters with the independently optimized FANCI parameters at the same value of $\lambda$. For nonlinear coupled-cluster ansatzes, especially when larger $\lambda$-steps are used, the corrected approximation reduces the same-$\lambda$ parameter deviations and suppresses large parameter-space excursions. These results show that the leading nonlinear overlap correction improves the reliability of FANPT as a continuation strategy for nonlinear wavefunction equations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.11421 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic workflow of the FANPT implementation in Fanpy. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FANPT results for the C2v insertion of Be into H2 using the CCSD(0) wavefunc￾tion. (a) Total energies and (b) energy differences relative to the independently optimized CCSD(0) wavefunction energies. All calculations used the STO-6G basis set. The same-λ diagnostics compare the FANPT-predicted solution at each value of λ with the independently optimized FANCI solution at the same λ. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:fig… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FANPT results for the C2v insertion of Be into H2 using the CCSDT(2)Q(0) wavefunction. (a) Total energies and (b) energy differences relative to the independently optimized CCSDT(2)Q(0) wavefunction energies. All calculations used the STO-6G basis set. improvement with qao = 3. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Cost–quality comparison for the C2v insertion of Be into H2 using the CCSDT(2)Q(0) wavefunction. The mean same-λ Frobenius norm of the parameter correc￾tion is plotted against the mean total FANPT wall time over the ten molecular geometries for (a) final order 2 and (b…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Szabo, A.; Ostlund, N. S. Modern quantum chemistry: introduction to advanced electronic structure theory; Courier Corporation, 1996

  2. [2]

    Molecular electronic-structure theory; John Wiley & Sons, 2013

    Helgaker, T.; Jorgensen, P.; Olsen, J. Molecular electronic-structure theory; John Wiley & Sons, 2013

  3. [3]

    O.; Taylor, P

    Roos, B. O.; Taylor, P. R.; Sigbahn, P. E. A complete active space SCF method (CASSCF) using a density matrix formulated super-CI approach. Chemical Physics 1980, 48, 157--173

  4. [4]

    E.; Alml \"o f, J.; Heiberg, A.; Roos, B

    Siegbahn, P. E.; Alml \"o f, J.; Heiberg, A.; Roos, B. O. The complete active space SCF (CASSCF) method in a Newton--Raphson formulation with application to the HNO molecule. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1981, 74, 2384--2396

  5. [5]

    Roos, B. O. The complete active space SCF method in a fock-matrix-based super-CI formulation. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 1980, 18, 175--189

  6. [6]

    Roos, B. O. The complete active space self-consistent field method and its applications in electronic structure calculations. Advances in Chemical Physics: Ab Initio Methods in Quantum Chemistry Part 2 1987, 69, 399--445

  7. [7]

    Hierarchy Configuration Interaction: Combining Seniority Number and Excitation Degree

    Kossoski, F.; Damour, Y.; Loos, P.-F. Hierarchy Configuration Interaction: Combining Seniority Number and Excitation Degree. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2022, 13, 4342--4349, PMID: 35537704

  8. [8]

    A.; Tubman, N

    Holmes, A. A.; Tubman, N. M.; Umrigar, C. J. Heat-Bath Configuration Interaction: An Efficient Selected Configuration Interaction Algorithm Inspired by Heat-Bath Sampling. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2016, 12, 3674--3680, PMID: 27428771

Show all 88 references
  1. [9]

    B.; Evangelista, F

    Schriber, J. B.; Evangelista, F. A. Communication: An adaptive configuration interaction approach for strongly correlated electrons with tunable accuracy. The Journal of chemical physics 2016, 144

  2. [10]

    A.; de Moura, C

    Lokhande, R. A.; de Moura, C. E. V.; Gaikwad, P. B.; Miranda-Quintana, R. A. Exploring New Construction Schemes for Extended-Hierarchy Configuration–Interaction Wave Functions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2026, 130, 4074--4085, PMID: 42118961

  3. [11]

    J.; Handy, N

    Knowles, P. J.; Handy, N. C. A Determinant Based Full Configuration Interaction Program. Computer Physics Communications 1989, 54, 75--83

  4. [12]

    J.; Handy, N

    Knowles, P. J.; Handy, N. C. A New Determinant-Based Full Configuration Interaction Method. Chemical Physics Letters 1984, 111, 315--321

  5. [13]

    Knowles, P. J. Very Large Full Configuration Interaction Calculations. Chemical Physics Letters 1989, 155, 513--517

  6. [14]

    J.; Musia , M

    Bartlett, R. J.; Musia , M. Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2007, 79, 291--352

  7. [15]

    Shavitt, I.; Bartlett, R. J. Many-body methods in chemistry and physics: MBPT and coupled-cluster theory; Cambridge university press, 2009

  8. [16]

    Bartlett, R. J. The coupled-cluster revolution. Molecular Physics 2010, 108, 2905--2920

  9. [17]

    Lokhande, R.; de Moura, C. E. V.; Zsigmond, K.; Ayers, P. W.; Miranda-Quintana, R. A. A New Family of Seniority-Restricted Coupled Cluster Methods. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2026, 130, 4469--4478, PMID: 42210909

  10. [18]

    A.; Harrison, J

    Nicely, V. A.; Harrison, J. F. Geminal product wavefunctions: A general formalism. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1971, 54, 4363--4368

  11. [19]

    Geminal-based electronic structure methods in quantum chemistry

    Tecmer, P.; Boguslawski, K. Geminal-based electronic structure methods in quantum chemistry. Toward a geminal model chemistry. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2022, 24, 23026--23048

  12. [20]

    A.; Xu, F

    Rassolov, V. A.; Xu, F. Geminal model chemistry III: Partial spin restriction. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2007, 126, 234112

  13. [21]

    A.; Xu, F.; Garashchuk, S

    Rassolov, V. A.; Xu, F.; Garashchuk, S. Geminal model chemistry II. Perturbative corrections. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2004, 120, 10385--10394

  14. [22]

    Rassolov, V. A. A geminal model chemistry. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2002, 117, 5978--5987

  15. [23]

    Mazziotti, D. A. Energy functional of the one-particle reduced density matrix: A geminal approach. Chemical Physics Letters 2001, 338, 323--328

  16. [24]

    Mazziotti, D. A. Geminal functional theory: A synthesis of density and density matrix methods. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2000, 112, 10125--10130

  17. [25]

    Extended geminal models

    R eggen, I. Extended geminal models. Correlation and Localization 1999, 203, 89

  18. [26]

    Extremal electron pairs

    Kutzelnigg, W.; Vogtner, S. Extremal electron pairs. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 1996, 60, 235--248

  19. [27]

    J.; Shull, H.; Hagstrom, S

    Levy, M.; Stevens, W. J.; Shull, H.; Hagstrom, S. Transferability of electron pairs between H2O and H2O2. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1974, 61, 1844--1856

  20. [28]

    Diagrammatical Method for Geminals

    Paldus, J.; Sengupta, S.; C \'i z ek, J. Diagrammatical Method for Geminals. II. Applications. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1972, 57, 652--666

  21. [29]

    Diagrammatical Method for Geminals

    Paldus, J. Diagrammatical Method for Geminals. I. Theory. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1972, 57, 638--651

  22. [30]

    Geminal Localization in the Separated-Pair pi-Electronic Model of Benzene

    Paldus, J.; C \'i z ek, J.; Sengupta, S. Geminal Localization in the Separated-Pair pi-Electronic Model of Benzene. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1971, 55, 2452--2462

  23. [31]

    Silver, D. M. Electron Pair Correlation: Products of N(N - 1)/2 Geminals for N Electrons. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1971, 55, 1461--1467

  24. [32]

    J.; Shull, H.; Hagstrom, S

    Levy, M.; Stevens, W. J.; Shull, H.; Hagstrom, S. Transferability of Strongly Orthogonal Geminals between H2O and H2O2. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1970, 52, 5483--5485

  25. [33]

    Silver, D. M. Bilinear orbital expansion of geminal-product correlated wavefunctions. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1970, 52, 299--303

  26. [34]

    Silver, D. M. Natural orbital expansion of interacting geminals. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1969, 50, 5108--5116

  27. [35]

    F.; Davidson, E

    Bender, C. F.; Davidson, E. R.; Peat, F. D. Application of geminal methods to molecular calculations. Physical Review 1968, 174, 75--80

  28. [36]

    Coleman, A. J. Structure of fermion density matrices. II. Antisymmetrized geminal powers. Journal of Mathematical Physics 1965, 6, 1425--1431

  29. [37]

    W.; Fogel, S

    Smith, D. W.; Fogel, S. J. Natural Orbitals and Geminals of the Beryllium Atom. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1965, 43, S91--S96

  30. [38]

    A.; Limacher, P

    Johnson, P. A.; Limacher, P. A.; Kim, T. D.; Richer, M.; Miranda-Quintana, R. A.; Heidar-Zadeh, F.; Ayers, P. W.; Bultinck, P.; De Baerdemacker, S.; Van Neck, D. Strategies for extending geminal-based wavefunctions: Open shells and beyond. Computational and Theoretical Chemist...

  31. [39]

    B.; Kim, T

    Gaikwad, P. B.; Kim, T. D.; Richer, M.; Lokhande, R. A.; Sánchez-Díaz, G.; Limacher, P. A.; Ayers, P. W.; Miranda-Quintana, R. A. Coupled cluster-inspired geminal wavefunctions. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2024, 160, 144108

  32. [40]

    Surjan, P. R. In Correlation and Localization ; Surjan, P. R., Ed.; Topics in Current Chemistry ; 1999; Vol. 203; pp 63--88

  33. [41]

    R.; Szabados, A.; Jeszenszki, P.; Zoboki, T

    Surjan, P. R.; Szabados, A.; Jeszenszki, P.; Zoboki, T. Strongly Orthogonal Geminals: Size-Extensive and Variational Reference States. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry 2012, 50, 534--551

  34. [42]

    A.; Limacher, P

    Tecmer, P.; Boguslawski, K.; Johnson, P. A.; Limacher, P. A.; Chan, M.; Verstraelen, T.; Ayers, P. W. Assessing the Accuracy of New Geminal-Based Approaches . Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2014, 118, 9058--9068

  35. [43]

    A.; Fecteau, C.- \'E .; Berthiaume, F.; Cloutier, S.; Carrier, L.; Gratton, M.; Bultinck, P.; De Baerdemacker, S.; Van Neck, D.; Limacher, P.; Ayers, P

    Johnson, P. A.; Fecteau, C.- \'E .; Berthiaume, F.; Cloutier, S.; Carrier, L.; Gratton, M.; Bultinck, P.; De Baerdemacker, S.; Van Neck, D.; Limacher, P.; Ayers, P. W. Richardson-- Gaudin Mean-Field for Strong Correlation in Quantum Chemistry. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2...

  36. [44]

    D.; Ayers, P

    Richer, M.; Kim, T. D.; Ayers, P. W. Graphical Approach to Interpreting and Efficiently Evaluating Geminal Wavefunctions . International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 2025, 125, e70000

  37. [45]

    I.; Verstraete, F

    Cirac, J. I.; Verstraete, F. Renormalization and tensor product states in spin chains and lattices. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 2009, 42, 504004

  38. [46]

    Class of quantum many-body states that can be efficiently simulated

    Vidal, G. Class of quantum many-body states that can be efficiently simulated. Physical Review Letters 2008, 101, 110501

  39. [47]

    Entanglement renormalization

    Vidal, G. Entanglement renormalization. Physical Review Letters 2007, 99, 220405

  40. [48]

    Fannes, M.; Nachtergaele, B.; Werner, R. F. Ground states of VBS models on Cayley trees. Journal of Statistical Physics 1992, 66, 939--973

  41. [49]

    A.; De Baerdemacker, S

    Gunts, K.; Van Neck, D.; Limacher, P. A.; De Baerdemacker, S. The seniority quantum number in Tensor Network States. SciPost Chemistry 2020, 1, 001

  42. [50]

    H.; Reiher, M

    Marti, K. H.; Reiher, M. The Density Matrix Renormalization Group Algorithm in Quantum Chemistry . Zeitschrift Fur Physikalische Chemie-International Journal of Research in Physical Chemistry & Chemical Physics 2010, 224, 583--599

  43. [51]

    J.; Kinder, J

    Changlani, H. J.; Kinder, J. M.; Umrigar, C. J.; Chan, G. K.-L. Approximating Strongly Correlated Wave Functions with Correlator Product States. Physical Review B 2009, 80, 245116

  44. [52]

    H.; Bauer, B.; Reiher, M.; Troyer, M.; Verstraete, F

    Marti, K. H.; Bauer, B.; Reiher, M.; Troyer, M.; Verstraete, F. Complete-Graph Tensor Network States: A New Fermionic Wave Function Ansatz for Molecules. New Journal of Physics 2010, 12, 103008

  45. [53]

    K.-L.; Keselman, A.; Nakatani, N.; Li, Z.; White, S

    Chan, G. K.-L.; Keselman, A.; Nakatani, N.; Li, Z.; White, S. R. Matrix product operators, matrix product states, and ab initio density matrix renormalization group algorithms. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2016, 145, 014102

  46. [54]

    The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states

    Schollw \"o ck, U. The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states. Annals of Physics 2011, 326, 96--192

  47. [55]

    Thermodynamic limit of density matrix renormalization

    \"O stlund, S.; Rommer, S. Thermodynamic limit of density matrix renormalization. Physical Review Letters 1995, 75, 3537--3540

  48. [56]

    A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states

    Or \'u s, R. A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states. Annals of Physics 2014, 349, 117--158

  49. [57]

    Schuch, N.; Cirac, J. I. Matrix product state and mean-field solutions for one-dimensional systems can be found efficiently. Physical Review A 2010, 82, 012314

  50. [58]

    I.; Verstraete, F

    Schuch, N.; Cirac, J. I.; Verstraete, F. Computational difficulty of finding matrix product ground states. Physical Review Letters 2008, 100, 250501

  51. [59]

    I.; Perez-Garcia, D.; Schuch, N.; Verstraete, F

    Cirac, J. I.; Perez-Garcia, D.; Schuch, N.; Verstraete, F. Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems. Reviews of Modern Physics 2021, 93, 045003

  52. [60]

    McCulloch, I. P. From density-matrix renormalization group to matrix product states. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2007, 2007, P10014

  53. [61]

    D.; Miranda-Quintana, R

    Kim, T. D.; Miranda-Quintana, R. A.; Richer, M.; Ayers, P. W. Flexible ansatz for N-body configuration interaction. Computational and Theoretical Chemistry 2021, 1202, 113187

  54. [62]

    A.; Kim, T

    Miranda-Quintana, R. A.; Kim, T. D.; Lokhande, R. A.; Richer, M.; Sánchez-Díaz, G.; Gaikwad, P. B.; Ayers, P. W. Flexible Ansatz for N-Body Perturbation Theory. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2024, 128, 3458--3467, PMID: 38651558

  55. [63]

    Dalgarno, A.; Lewis, J. T. The exact calculation of long-range forces between atoms by perturbation theory. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 1955, 233, 70

  56. [64]

    Peng, H. W. Perturbation theory for the self-consistent field. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 1941, 178, 499

  57. [65]

    Divergence in M ller--Plesset theory: A simple explanation based on a two-state model

    Olsen, J.; J rgensen, P.; Helgaker, T.; Christiansen, O. Divergence in M ller--Plesset theory: A simple explanation based on a two-state model. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2000, 112, 9736--9748

  58. [66]

    Stillinger, F. H. M ller--Plesset convergence issues in computational quantum chemistry. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2000, 112, 9711--9715

  59. [67]

    On perturbation expansions of the extended Koopmans' theorem

    Olsen, J.; Sundholm, D. On perturbation expansions of the extended Koopmans' theorem. Chemical Physics Letters 1998, 288, 282--288

  60. [68]

    O.; Andersson, K.; F \"u lscher, M

    Roos, B. O.; Andersson, K.; F \"u lscher, M. P.; Malmqvist, P.- .; Serrano-Andr \'e s, L.; Pierloot, K.; Merch \'a n, M. Advances in Chemical Physics: New Methods in Computational Quantum Mechanics; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1996; Vol. 93; pp 219--331

  61. [69]

    W.; Pople, J

    Raghavachari, K.; Trucks, G. W.; Pople, J. A.; Head-Gordon, M. A fifth-order perturbation comparison of electron correlation theories. Chemical Physics Letters 1989, 157, 479--483

  62. [70]

    Bartlett, R. J. Many-body perturbation theory and coupled cluster theory for electron correlation in molecules. Annual review of physical chemistry 1981, 32, 359--401

  63. [71]

    Goodson, D. Z. A summation procedure that improves the accuracy of the fourth-order M ller--Plesset perturbation theory. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2000, 113, 6461--6464

  64. [72]

    RI-MP2: First derivatives and global consistency

    Weigend, F.; H \"a ser, M. RI-MP2: First derivatives and global consistency. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts 1997, 97, 331--340

  65. [73]

    Surprising cases of divergent behavior in M ller--Plesset perturbation theory

    Olsen, J.; Christiansen, O.; Koch, H.; J rgensen, P. Surprising cases of divergent behavior in M ller--Plesset perturbation theory. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1996, 105, 5082--5090

  66. [74]

    Raghavachari, K.; Anderson, J. B. Electron correlation effects in molecules. The Journal of Physical Chemistry 1996, 100, 12960--12973

  67. [75]

    McDouall, J. J. W.; Peasley, K.; Robb, M. A. A simple MC SCF perturbation theory: Orthogonal valence bond M ller-Plesset 2 (OVB MP2). Chemical Physics Letters 1988, 148, 183--189

  68. [76]

    L.; Nielsen, I

    Janssen, C. L.; Nielsen, I. M. B. New diagnostics for coupled-cluster and M ller--Plesset perturbation theory. Chemical Physics Letters 1998, 290, 423--430

  69. [77]

    B.; Messmer, R

    Murphy, R. B.; Messmer, R. P. Generalized M ller--Plesset perturbation theory applied to general MCSCF reference wave functions. Chemical Physics Letters 1991, 183, 443--448

  70. [78]

    Second-order M ller--Plesset perturbation theory applied to extended systems

    Gr \"u neis, A.; Marsman, M.; Kresse, G. Second-order M ller--Plesset perturbation theory applied to extended systems. II. Structural and energetic properties. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2010, 133, 074107

  71. [79]

    G.; Sherrill, C

    Hohenstein, E. G.; Sherrill, C. D. Efficient evaluation of triple excitations in symmetry-adapted perturbation theory via second-order M ller--Plesset perturbation theory natural orbitals. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2010, 133, 104107

  72. [80]

    S.; Bogdanov, N

    Sun, Q.; Zhang, X.; Banerjee, S.; Bao, P.; Barbry, M.; Blunt, N. S.; Bogdanov, N. A.; Booth, G. H.; Chen, J.; Cui, Z.-H.; Eriksen, J. J.; Gao, Y.; Guo, S.; Hermann, J.; Hermes, M. R.; Koh, K.; Koval, P.; Lehtola, S.; Li, Z.; Liu, J.; Mardirossian, N.; McClain, J. D.; Motta, M....

  73. [81]

    C.; Blunt, N

    Sun, Q.; Berkelbach, T. C.; Blunt, N. S.; Booth, G. H.; Guo, S.; Li, Z.; Liu, J.; McClain, J. D.; Sharma, S.; Wouters, S.; Chan, G. K.-L. PySCF: The Python-based simulations of chemistry framework. WIREs Computational Molecular Science 2018, 8, e1340

  74. [82]

    Libcint: An efficient general integral library for Gaussian basis functions

    Sun, Q. Libcint: An efficient general integral library for Gaussian basis functions. Journal of Computational Chemistry 2015, 36, 1664--1671

  75. [83]

    https://github.com/mqcomplab/Fanpy, 2024; Accessed: 2025-05-15

    MQCompLab Fanpy: A Python package for ansatz-based quantum chemistry. https://github.com/mqcomplab/Fanpy, 2024; Accessed: 2025-05-15

  76. [84]

    D.; Richer, M.; Sánchez-Díaz, G.; Miranda-Quintana, R

    Kim, T. D.; Richer, M.; Sánchez-Díaz, G.; Miranda-Quintana, R. A.; Verstraelen, T.; Heidar-Zadeh, F.; Ayers, P. W. Fanpy: A python library for prototyping multideterminant methods in ab initio quantum chemistry. Journal of Computational Chemistry 2023, 44, 697--709

  77. [85]

    D.; Tehrani, A.; Wang, S.; Gaikwad, P

    Richer, M.; S \'a nchez-D \'i az , G.; Mart \'i nez-Gonz \'a lez , M.; Chuiko, V.; Kim, T. D.; Tehrani, A.; Wang, S.; Gaikwad, P. B.; de Moura , C. E. V.; Masschelein, C.; Miranda-Quintana , R. A.; Gerolin, A.; Heidar-Zadeh , F.; Ayers, P. W. PyCI : A Python-scriptable Library...

  78. [86]

    Zsigmond, K.; Lokhande, R.; de Moura, C. E. V.; Gaikwad, P. B.; Mart \'i nez-Gonz \'a lez, M.; Richer, M.; Calero-Osorio, D. F.; Ayers, P. W.; Miranda-Quintana, R. A. Fanpy 2.0: Wavefunction Implementation and Analysis Tools for Flexible Ansatz Design. 2026; https://arxiv.org/...

  79. [87]

    D.; Shepard, R.; Brown, F

    Purvis III, G. D.; Shepard, R.; Brown, F. B.; Bartlett, R. J. C2V Insertion pathway for BeH2: A test problem for the coupled-cluster single and double excitation model. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 1983, 23, 835--845

  80. [88]

    B.; Kim, T

    Gaikwad, P. B.; Kim, T. D.; Richer, M.; Lokhande, R. A.; Sánchez-Díaz, G.; Limacher, P. A.; Ayers, P. W.; Miranda-Quintana, R. A. Coupled cluster-inspired geminal wavefunctions. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2024, 160, 144108 mcitethebibliography

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.