Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 71 references

A D4 flavor symmetry with three right-handed neutrinos and three scalar doublets is presented as the minimal framework that can give all three neutrino masses and a stable dark-matter candidate through a rank-2 seesaw plus rank-1 scotogenic

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 21:31 UTC pith:NDUBE2QR

load-bearing objection A solid model-building paper whose rank-2 + rank-1 neutrino mass argument is correct and checkable, but whose vacuum alignment is assumed rather than derived, and whose 'smallest symmetry' and 'predicted mass' claims outrun what the appendix and scan actually prove. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.16049 v1 pith:NDUBE2QR submitted 2026-07-17 hep-ph

Minimalist Seesaw-Scotogenic Mechanism as a Source for Neutrino Physics

Eduardo Peinado , Abdel P\'erez-Lorenzana , Isangel Toledo This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords D4 flavor symmetryscotogenic mechanismtype-I seesawneutrino massesneutrino mass orderingscalar dark matterresidual Z2 symmetrydiscrete dark matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that a D4 flavor symmetry, together with three right-handed neutrinos and three scalar doublets, is the smallest field content that can explain neutrino masses and the dark sector at the same time. The light neutrino mass matrix is the sum of a tree-level type-I seesaw part that has rank two and a one-loop scotogenic part that has rank one; adding them yields three massive neutrinos. With real Yukawa couplings the model reproduces normal ordering, and with complex phases it also accommodates inverted ordering and the observed Dirac phase. The spontaneous breaking of D4 leaves a residual Z2 that stabilizes a scalar dark-matter candidate in the 50–200 GeV range, consistent with current direct-detection limits. The paper also surveys alternative groups and assignments to show why simpler configurations fail.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the D4-based extension—with right-handed neutrinos (ND ~ 2, Ns ~ 1_3) and scalar doublets (Phi_s ~ 1_1, Phi_D ~ 2), plus the lepton assignment in Table 1—produces the complete light-neutrino mass matrix m_nu = m_active + m_dark, where m_active is rank-2 and m_dark is rank-1. The active contribution comes from a type-I seesaw mediated by chi1 and Ns; the dark contribution comes from a scotogenic one-loop diagram mediated by chi2 and phi2. Because the same D4 Yukawa coupling controls both mechanisms, the balance between them is not a free tuning. The residual Z2 from the v1 = v2 vacuum alignment keeps phi2 and chi2 stable, so the model delivers a dark-matter c

What carries the argument

The central object is the light-neutrino mass-matrix identity m_nu = m_active + m_dark, with m_active of rank 2 and m_dark of rank 1. The identity is made possible by the D4 doublet vacuum alignment <Phi_D> proportional to (1,1)^T, which leaves a residual Z2 subgroup generated by B = a^3 b. Under that Z2, the rotated fields phi1 and chi1 are even while phi2 and chi2 are odd; the odd fields form the scotogenic dark sector, and the even fields carry the type-I seesaw. The D4 tensor-product rules force the active and dark Yukawa matrices to share the same couplings in a specific way, so the two mechanisms complement rather than compete.

Load-bearing premise

The whole mechanism rests on the scalar potential choosing the vacuum v1 = v2, which the paper treats as a local minimum and only scans around, without proving it is the global minimum; if the true ground state prefers v1 ≠ v2 or a nonzero <phi2>, the residual Z2 disappears and both dark-matter stability and the neutrino mass structure collapse.

What would settle it

Numerically minimize the full D4-invariant scalar potential in Eq. (2.1) from random starting points; find any minimum with v1 ≠ v2 or with a nonzero VEV for phi2 in the rotated basis lying below the v1 = v2 point. Such a ground state would break D4 completely, kill the residual Z2, and remove both the dark-matter candidate and the rank-2 + rank-1 neutrino mass structure. A second, independent check: observe scalar dark matter with mass outside 50–200 GeV or with a direct-detection cross-section above the LUX-ZEPLIN limit.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the D4 construction is correct, it identifies the smallest non-Abelian discrete flavor symmetry among the surveyed options that realizes the seesaw-scotogenic combination: the field content is exactly three right-handed neutrinos and three scalar doublets.
  • All three light neutrinos become massive, with the solar and atmospheric splittings and the observed mixing angles reproduced within 3 sigma; both normal and inverted ordering are possible once CP-violating phases are allowed.
  • The model predicts a scalar dark-matter candidate with mass between 50 and 200 GeV, thermally produced with the observed relic density and surviving current LUX-ZEPLIN direct-detection limits.
  • The rank structure yields concrete neutrinoless double-beta decay predictions: effective Majorana mass up to about 6.6 x 10^-3 eV for normal ordering and up to about 5.0 x 10^-2 eV for inverted ordering, testable by next-generation experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A reader may infer that the true proof burden is the vacuum alignment v1 = v2: a global-minimum calculation of the D4 potential would either confirm the mechanism or force a modification, for example an additional symmetry that makes the alignment automatic.
  • The failure modes catalogued for S3, Q6, and D6—active and dark neutrino mass matrices proportional to each other and rank-1—point to a general model-building rule: a viable seesaw-scotogenic model needs the group to assign active and dark sectors to different singlet contractions, not just different fields.
  • One testable consequence not emphasized by the paper: more precise measurements of delta_CP, together with future 0vββ results, could break the current flexibility, because the complex-Yukawa parameter space may have hidden correlations that only show up in the Majorana phases.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an extension of the Standard Model with a D4 flavor symmetry, three scalar doublets, and three right-handed neutrinos, combining a type-I seesaw with the scotogenic mechanism. It claims that D4 is the smallest non-Abelian discrete symmetry realizing this combination, that spontaneous D4 breaking leaves a residual Z2 stabilizing the lightest inert doublet scalar as dark matter, and that the active (tree-level plus one-loop) neutrino mass matrix is rank-2 while the dark (one-loop) contribution is rank-1, yielding a total rank-3 mass matrix. A numerical scan is used to show compatibility with neutrino oscillation data (both mass orderings when complex Yukawas are allowed) and with dark matter relic density and direct-detection constraints, predicting a scalar dark matter window of 50–200 GeV consistent with LUX-ZEPLIN.

Significance. If the vacuum-alignment premise is justified, the structural argument is a genuine contribution: the paper gives an explicit model in which the same flavor symmetry controls both the tree-level and radiative neutrino mass mechanisms, with transparent rank-2 plus rank-1 arguments, and it provides a useful no-go survey of alternatives in Appendix B. The dark matter mass window 50–200 GeV is a concrete, falsifiable prediction, and the use of SARAH/micrOmegas for the numerical scan is a strength. The main caveat is that the numerical agreements with neutrino data are achieved by scanning rather than by parameter-free predictions, so the paper should be read as a proof of principle with derived structural constraints rather than as a predictive fit.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 2.1, Eqs. (2.2)-(2.4)] The entire mechanism rests on the vacuum alignment v1=v2, <φ2>=0. The text states only that v_s ≠ 0 and v_1^2 - v_2^2 = 0 is "a minimum local value" of the potential (2.1), and the numerical scan imposes Hessian positivity at this point. No proof is given that this stationary point is the global minimum over the twelve-quartic potential. If a deeper minimum has v1≠v2 or <φ2>≠0, the generator B in Eq. (2.6) is broken, no residual Z2 (Eqs. (2.8)-(2.11)) stabilizes φ2 and χ2, and the decomposition mν = m_active + m_dark in Eq. (3.1) loses its Z2-even/odd meaning. Because the scan treats the VEVs as inputs, it cannot validate this premise. Please provide a global minimization analysis or otherwise demonstrate that all accepted parameter points satisfy the global minimum condition.
  2. [Sec. 5, numerical scan methodology] The claim that the model "successfully accommodates" neutrino data is supported only by scatter plots obtained after a Monte Carlo scan over all Yukawa and quartic couplings, with VEVs varied around the electroweak scale. This is a fit, not a prediction, and the text should state this more explicitly, especially in the abstract and conclusions. The structural rank arguments are derived, but the numerical agreement with oscillation parameters and the 50–200 GeV dark matter window are not parameter-free. It would strengthen the paper to provide benchmark points and to identify which observables, if any, are correlated in a way that could be falsified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 1] The abstract claims D4 is "the smallest discrete flavor symmetry" without qualification. Appendix B only surveys S3, D4, Q6, and D6, so the claim should be stated as "smallest among the explored candidates" unless an exhaustive search over groups of order ≤8 is provided.
  2. [Sec. 5.1.1 and Fig. 5] Color labels are inconsistent: the Fig. 5 caption says "beige and pink regions" for the 3σ neutrino constraints, while the text says "yellow region" (NO) and "green region" (IO). Please align the caption and text.
  3. [General] Typos and formatting errors include "splitings" in the abstract, "T able" in table captions, "vevs" (should be "VEVs" or "vacuum expectation values"), "WIMP like" in Sec. 4.4, and an unclear factor "4" in Eq. (2.20). Please proofread carefully.
  4. [Sec. 4.1] The bounded-from-below conditions for the 12-coupling scalar potential are cited to Refs. [30–32] but not stated. Since these conditions are nontrivial and are part of the theoretical constraints, either list them explicitly or state that they are implemented in the numerical code with the specific form used.
  5. [Sec. 5.1] The statement that real Yukawas make the model incompatible with inverted ordering is asserted without a derivation or a dedicated plot. This is an interesting structural result and should be substantiated with an explicit argument or a figure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the D4 rank structure and residual Z2 decomposition are derived from the field assignments, and the numerical agreement is a parameter-space consistency check rather than a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The residual Z2 (Eqs. 2.6-2.11) follows from the explicitly adopted vacuum v1=v2=vd (Eqs. 2.3-2.4), and the rank-2 active plus rank-1 dark decomposition of m_nu (Eqs. 3.1, 3.3, 3.14) is obtained from the explicit Yukawa matrices of Eq. 2.23, not from fitting the oscillation data. The exclusions of S3/Q6/D6 in Appendix B are also direct computations (e.g., m_active ∝ m_dark for S3), so the minimality claim does not rest on a self-citation. Ref. [13], a prior paper by one of the authors, is cited for the general active-plus-dark framework but the present paper re-derives the relevant structure; it is not load-bearing. The numerical scan is a Monte Carlo consistency check: parameters are scanned and points are filtered by oscillation, LFV, precision, and DM constraints, so the resulting accommodation of neutrino observables and the 50-200 GeV DM window is a filtering/postdiction result rather than an independent prediction, and it is not circular in the sense of a fitted parameter renamed a prediction. The genuine caveat is that Eq. 2.2 is asserted only as 'a minimum local value' and the global minimum of the twelve-lambda potential is not proven; if the true minimum broke the Z2 direction, DM stability and the rank-2+rank-1 structure would be lost. That is an omitted robustness proof and a correctness risk, not a circularity by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 3 invented entities

The paper's genuinely predictive content is structural (rank counting, textures, the active/dark coupling linkage). Every numerical output — splittings, mixings, delta_CP, relic density, sigma_SI, <m_beta_beta> — comes from scanning roughly 22-25 free parameters and retaining points that satisfy the data at 3-sigma. The model buys its agreement by fitting, not by parameter-free derivation.

free parameters (5)
  • y_nu1..y_nu5 (complex neutrino Yukawa couplings) = not quoted; scanned to fit oscillation data at 3-sigma
    Eq. (2.23): five Yukawa couplings set the texture and magnitude of m_active and m_dark; together with M and M_s they are fitted to Delta m^2_21, Delta m^2_31, theta12, theta13, theta23, delta_CP in Sec. 5.1.
  • M, M_s (heavy right-handed neutrino masses) = scanned in [1e4, 1e8] GeV
    Sec. 5: sets the seesaw scale; the range is chosen so the lightest inert scalar remains the lightest dark-sector state.
  • lambda_1..lambda_12 (scalar quartic couplings) = not quoted; bounded by |lambda| <= 4 pi
    Eq. (2.1): set scalar masses, the Higgs portal, and hence relic density and direct-detection rates; effectively fit to Omega h^2 = 0.12 and the LZ bound in Sec. 5.2.
  • v_s, v_d (scalar VEVs) = "varied around the electroweak scale"
    Sec. 5: set the Fermi scale and realize the alignment assumed in Eq. (2.3).
  • y_l1..y_l5 (charged-lepton Yukawas) = not quoted; constrained by charged-lepton masses
    Eq. (2.22): mu-tau texture; effectively fixed by m_e, m_mu, m_tau.
axioms (5)
  • standard math D4 group theory, real-basis representation, and product rules of Appendix A
    Used throughout to build the invariant potential (Eq. 2.1) and Yukawa Lagrangian (Eq. 2.21).
  • domain assumption Type-I seesaw and scotogenic one-loop mass formulas (refs [16,28,29]) are the operative neutrino-mass mechanisms
    The model's mass generation is asserted to be the combination of these two mechanisms; Eqs. (3.7)-(3.14) follow the standard loop formulae.
  • ad hoc to paper Vacuum alignment v1 = v2 with <phi2> = 0 in the rotated basis
    Eqs. (2.2)-(2.4): asserted as a local minimum (with Hessian positivity imposed numerically); the global-minimum statement is not proven and the scan treats the VEVs as inputs.
  • domain assumption Thermal WIMP production and standard cosmology for the relic density
    Sec. 4.4: Omega h^2 = 0.12 +/- 0.0036 from Planck is imposed; no non-thermal production is considered.
  • domain assumption Perturbativity bounds |lambda|, |y|^2 <= 4 pi and bounded-from-below conditions
    Eq. (4.1): standard model-building axioms that define the scanned parameter region.
invented entities (3)
  • phi2 (Z2-odd scalar doublet, the 'dark' Higgs) independent evidence
    purpose: Dark matter candidate; the scalar running in the scotogenic loop of Fig. 4
    Has a falsifiable handle: the 50-200 GeV mass window with LZ/XENONnT sigma_SI bounds (Fig. 10) and the Br(h_s -> inv) < 0.11 constraint for m_DM < M_hs/2 (Fig. 9).
  • chi2 (Z2-odd right-handed neutrino) no independent evidence
    purpose: Fermion in the scotogenic loop; provides the rank-1 dark mass contribution
    Mass-degenerate with chi1 (mass M, forced by the D4 doublet); its only observable imprints enter through the fitted neutrino mass matrix and LFV rates, so it has no independent falsifiable handle outside the fit.
  • N_s (D4-singlet right-handed neutrino) no independent evidence
    purpose: Third seesaw state that generates theta13 and enables the NO/IO fit
    Its effects enter through fitted neutrino observables and the <m_beta_beta> prediction (Fig. 5); no direct handle outside the model's fit.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 24987 in / 25099 out tokens · 223173 ms · 2026-08-01T21:31:20.679760+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We identify the smallest discrete flavor symmetry and minimal field content that can simultaneously account for neutrino masses and the dark sector in the context of the discrete dark matter. Minimality is achieved with a $D_4$ symmetry by adding three right-handed neutrinos and three scalar doublets. Within this framework, tree-level and one-loop contributions yield the observed solar--atmospheric mass splitings as well as the observed neutrino mixings. Furthermore, by including CP-violating phases, the model successfully accommodates both normal and inverted ordering. Spontaneous $D_4$ breaking leaves a residual $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry that stabilizes the dark matter candidate, with a predicted mass within the $50$--$200$ GeV range, consistent with LUX-ZEPLIN limits.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 14 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Bilenky and B

    S. Bilenky and B. Pontecorvo,Lepton mixing and neutrino oscillations,Physics Reports41 (1978) 225

    1978

  2. [2]

    Feruglio,Are neutrino masses modular forms?,1706.08749

    F. Feruglio,Are neutrino masses modular forms?,1706.08749

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    Nomura, H

    T. Nomura, H. Okada and O. Popov,Non-holomorphic modularA 4 symmetric scotogenic model,2409.12547

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    Nomura, H

    T. Nomura, H. Okada and X.-Y. Wang,A radiative neutrino mass model with leptoquarks under non-holomorphic modularA 4 symmetry,2504.21404

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    Tanimoto,Neutrino masses and mixings with flavor symmetries,hep-ph/9910261

    M. Tanimoto,Neutrino masses and mixings with flavor symmetries,hep-ph/9910261

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    Ishimori, T

    H. Ishimori, T. Kobayashi, H. Ohki, Y. Shimizu, H. Okada and M. Tanimoto,Non-Abelian Discrete Symmetries in Particle Physics,Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.183(2010) 1 [1003.3552]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    Grimus and L

    W. Grimus and L. Lavoura,A discrete symmetry group for maximal atmospheric neutrino mixing,Physics Letters B572(2003) 189–195

    2003

  8. [8]

    Bonilla, L.M

    C. Bonilla, L.M. de la Vega, R. Ferro-Hernandez, N. Nath and E. Peinado,Neutrino phenomenology in a left-rightD 4 symmetric model,Physical Review D102(2020)

    2020

  9. [9]

    Bilenky and S.T

    S.M. Bilenky and S.T. Petcov,Massive neutrinos and neutrino oscillations,Rev. Mod. Phys. 59(1987) 671

    1987

  10. [10]

    ´Avila, G

    I.M. ´Avila, G. Cottin and M.A. D ´ ıaz,Revisiting the scotogenic model with scalar dark matter,Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics49(2022) 065001

    2022

  11. [11]

    Morisi and J

    S. Morisi and J. Valle,Neutrino masses and mixing: a flavour symmetry roadmap, Fortschritte der Physik61(2012) 466–492

    2012

  12. [12]

    Aghanim, Y

    N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini et al., Planck 2018 results: Vi. cosmological parameters,Astronomy & Astrophysics641(2020) A6

    2018

  13. [13]

    Bonilla, J

    C. Bonilla, J. Herms, O. Medina and E. Peinado,Discrete dark matter mechanism as the source of neutrino mass scales,Journal of High Energy Physics2023(2023)

    2023

  14. [14]

    Hirsch, S

    M. Hirsch, S. Morisi, E. Peinado and J.W.F. Valle,Discrete dark matter,Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 116003

    2010

  15. [15]

    Boucenna, M

    M.S. Boucenna, M. Hirsch, S. Morisi, E. Peinado, M. Taoso and J.W.F. Valle, Phenomenology of Dark Matter fromA 4 Flavor Symmetry,JHEP05(2011) 037 [1101.2874]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  16. [16]

    Ma,Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter,Physical Review D73(2006)

    E. Ma,Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter,Physical Review D73(2006)

    2006

  17. [17]

    de Salas, D.V

    P.F. de Salas, D.V. Forero, S. Gariazzo, P. Mart ´ ınez-Mirav´ e, O. Mena, C.A. Ternes et al., 2020 global reassessment of the neutrino oscillation picture,Journal of High Energy Physics 2021(2021)

    2020

  18. [18]

    Esteban, M.C

    I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J.P. Pinheiro and T. Schwetz,Nufit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,Journal of High Energy Physics2024(2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Boucenna, S

    M.S. Boucenna, S. Morisi, E. Peinado, J.W.F. Valle and Y. Shimizu,Predictive discrete dark matter model and neutrino oscillations,Physical Review D86(2012) . – 31 –

    2012

  20. [20]

    Meloni, S

    D. Meloni, S. Morisi and E. Peinado,Stability of dark matter from theD 4 ×Z f 2 flavor group, Physics Letters B703(2011) 281

    2011

  21. [21]

    A. Blum, C. Hagedorn and M. Lindner,Fermion masses and mixings from dihedral flavor symmetries with preserved subgroups,Physical Review D77(2008)

    2008

  22. [22]

    Adulpravitchai, A

    A. Adulpravitchai, A. Blum and C. Hagedorn,A supersymmetricD 4 model forµ–τ symmetry,Journal of High Energy Physics2009(2009) 046

    2009

  23. [23]

    Mandal, R

    S. Mandal, R. Srivastava and J.W. Valle,The simplest scoto-seesaw model: Wimp dark matter phenomenology and higgs vacuum stability,Physics Letters B819(2021) 136458

    2021

  24. [24]

    Aranda, C

    A. Aranda, C. Bonilla and E. Peinado,Dynamical generation of neutrino mass scales, Physics Letters B792(2019) 40–42

    2019

  25. [25]

    Rojas, R

    N. Rojas, R. Srivastava and J.W. Valle,Simplest scoto-seesaw mechanism,Physics Letters B 789(2019) 132–136

    2019

  26. [26]

    Barreiros, F.R

    D.M. Barreiros, F.R. Joaquim, R. Srivastava and J.W.F. Valle,Minimal scoto-seesaw mechanism with spontaneous cp violation,Journal of High Energy Physics2021(2021)

    2021

  27. [27]

    Barreiros, H.B

    D.M. Barreiros, H.B. Cˆ amara and F.R. Joaquim,Flavour and dark matter in a scoto/type-ii seesaw model,Journal of High Energy Physics2022(2022)

    2022

  28. [28]

    Aristizabal Sierra and C.E

    D. Aristizabal Sierra and C.E. Yaguna,On the importance of the 1-loop finite corrections to seesaw neutrino masses,Journal of High Energy Physics2011(2011)

    2011

  29. [29]

    Escribano, M

    P. Escribano, M. Reig and A. Vicente,Generalizing the Scotogenic model,JHEP07(2020) 097 [2004.05172]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    Kannike,Vacuum stability conditions from copositivity criteria,The European Physical Journal C72(2012)

    K. Kannike,Vacuum stability conditions from copositivity criteria,The European Physical Journal C72(2012)

    2012

  31. [31]

    Maniatis and O

    M. Maniatis and O. Nachtmann,Stability and symmetry breaking in the general n-Higgs-doublet model,JHEP02(2015) 058 [1407.7774]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    Degee, I.P

    A. Degee, I.P. Ivanov and V. Keus,Geometric minimization of highly symmetric potentials, Journal of High Energy Physics2013(2013)

    2013

  33. [33]

    Peskin and T

    M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi,Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections,Phys. Rev. D46 (1992) 381

    1992

  34. [34]

    Grimus, L

    W. Grimus, L. Lavoura, O. Ogreid and P. Osland,The oblique parameters in multi-higgs-doublet models,Nuclear Physics B801(2008) 81–96

    2008

  35. [35]

    Grimus, L

    W. Grimus, L. Lavoura, O.M. Ogreid and P. Osland,A precision constraint on multi-higgs-doublet models,Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics35(2008) 075001

    2008

  36. [36]

    Hern´ andez, S

    A.C. Hern´ andez, S. Kovalenko and I. Schmidt,Precision measurements constraints on the number of higgs doublets,Physical Review D91(2015)

    2015

  37. [37]

    Hern´ andez, C

    A.E.C. Hern´ andez, C. Espinoza, J.C. G´ omez-Izquierdo, J. Marchant Gonz´ alez and M. Mondrag´ on,Phenomenology of extended multihiggs doublet models withs 4 family symmetry,The European Physical Journal C84(2024) . [38]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001. – 32 –

    2024

  38. [39]

    Toma and A

    T. Toma and A. Vicente,Lepton flavor violation in the scotogenic model,Journal of High Energy Physics2014(2014)

    2014

  39. [40]

    Grimus and L

    W. Grimus and L. Lavoura,One-loop corrections to the seesaw mechanism in the multi-higgs-doublet standard model,Physics Letters B546(2002) 86–95

    2002

  40. [41]

    Sher and Y

    M. Sher and Y. Yuan,Rare B decays, rare tau decays and grand unification,Phys. Rev. D44 (1991) 1461

    1991

  41. [42]

    Sun, S.-M

    R.-Z. Sun, S.-M. Zhao, M.-Y. Liu, X.-Y. Han, S. Gao and X.-X. Dong,Lepton flavor violating decaysl j →l iγ, lj →3l i andµ→e+q¯qin the N-B-LSSM,Eur. Phys. J. C85 (2025) 1038 [2502.18130]

    arXiv 2025

  42. [43]

    Redigolo, M

    D. Redigolo, M. Tammaro and A. Tesi,Large CP violation in flavor violating muon decays, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 103 [2408.00847]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [44]

    Lavoura,General formulae forf 1 →f 2γ,The European Physical Journal C - Particles and Fields29(2003) 191

    L. Lavoura,General formulae forf 1 →f 2γ,The European Physical Journal C - Particles and Fields29(2003) 191

    2003

  44. [45]

    collaboration, K

    M.I. collaboration, K. Afanaciev, A.M. Baldini, S. Ban, V. Baranov, H. Benmansour et al.,A search forµ + →e +γwith the first dataset of the meg ii experiment,2310.12614. [46]BABAR Collaborationcollaboration,Searches for lepton flavor violation in the decays τ ± →e ±γandτ ± →µ ±γ,Phys. Rev. Lett.104(2010) 021802

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  45. [47]

    De Salas, S

    P. De Salas, S. Gariazzo, O. Mena, C. Ternes and M. T´ ortola,Neutrino Mass Ordering from Oscillations and Beyond: 2018 Status and Future Prospects,Front. Astron. Space Sci.5 (2018) 36 [1806.11051]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  46. [48]

    Gariazzo, M

    S. Gariazzo, M. Archidiacono, P.F. de Salas, O. Mena, C.A. Ternes and M. T´ ortola,Neutrino masses and their ordering: Global Data, Priors and Models,JCAP1803(2018) 011 [1801.04946]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  47. [49]

    Esteban, M

    I. Esteban, M. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz and A. Zhou,The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,Journal of High Energy Physics 2020(2020)

    2020

  48. [50]

    Belyaev, G

    A. Belyaev, G. Cacciapaglia, I.P. Ivanov, F. Rojas-Abatte and M. Thomas,Anatomy of the inert two-higgs-doublet model in the light of the lhc and non-lhc dark matter searches, Physical Review D97(2018)

    2018

  49. [51]

    Lundstr¨ om, M

    E. Lundstr¨ om, M. Gustafsson and J. Edsj¨ o,Inert doublet model and lep ii limits,Physical Review D79(2009)

    2009

  50. [52]

    Castro-Alvaredo, J

    O.A. Castro-Alvaredo, J. Dreißig and A. Fring,Integrable scattering theories with unstable particles,The European Physical Journal C35(2004) 393–411

    2004

  51. [53]

    Pierce and J

    A. Pierce and J. Thaler,Natural dark matter from an unnatural higgs boson and new colored particles at the tev scale,Journal of High Energy Physics2007(2007) 026–026

    2007

  52. [54]

    X. Cui, A. Abdukerim, W. Chen, X. Chen, Y. Chen, B. Dong et al.,Dark matter results from 54-ton-day exposure of pandax-ii experiment,Physical Review Letters119(2017)

    2017

  53. [55]

    Aalbers, D

    J. Aalbers, D. Akerib, C. Akerlof, A. Al Musalhi, F. Alder, A. Alqahtani et al.,First dark matter search results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment,Physical Review Letters131 (2023)

    2023

  54. [56]

    Aprile, K

    E. Aprile, K. Abe, F. Agostini, S. Ahmed Maouloud, L. Althueser, B. Andrieu et al.,First – 33 – dark matter search with nuclear recoils from the xenonnt experiment,Physical Review Letters 131(2023)

    2023

  55. [57]

    Garcia-Cely, M

    C. Garcia-Cely, M. Gustafsson and A. Ibarra,Probing the inert doublet dark matter model with cherenkov telescopes,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2016(2016) 043

    2016

  56. [58]

    Staub,SARAH 4: a tool for (not only susy) model builders,Computer Physics Communications185(2014) 1773–1790

    F. Staub,SARAH 4: a tool for (not only susy) model builders,Computer Physics Communications185(2014) 1773–1790

    2014

  57. [59]

    B´ elanger, F

    G. B´ elanger, F. Boudjema, A. Goudelis, A. Pukhov and B. Zald ´ ıvar,micromegas5.0: Freeze-in,Computer Physics Communications231(2018) 173–186

    2018

  58. [60]

    Abubakar, M.A

    S. Abubakar, M.A. Acero, B. Acharya, P. Adamson, N. Anfimov, A. Antoshkin et al.,Joint neutrino oscillation analysis from the T2K and NOvA experiments,Nature646(2025) 818–824. [61]KamLAND-Zen Collaborationcollaboration,Search for majorana neutrinos with the complete kamland-zen dataset,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 262501

    2025

  59. [62]

    Naredo-Tuero, M

    D. Naredo-Tuero, M. Escudero, E. Fernandez-Martinez, X. Marcano and V. Poulin,Critical look at the cosmological neutrino mass bound,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 123537

    2024

  60. [63]

    Collaboration, N

    L. Collaboration, N. Abgrall, I. Abt, M. Agostini, A. Alexander, C. Andreoiu et al., LEGEND-1000 preconceptual design report,2107.11462

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [64]

    Andringa, E

    S. Andringa, E. Arushanova, S. Asahi, M. Askins, D.J. Auty, A.R. Back et al.,Current status and future prospects of the SNO+ experiment,Advances in High Energy Physics2016 (2016) 1–21

    2016

  62. [65]

    Adhikari, S

    G. Adhikari, S. Al Kharusi, E. Angelico, G. Anton, I.J. Arnquist, I. Badhrees et al.,nEXO: neutrinoless double beta decay search beyond 1028 year half-life sensitivity,Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics49(2021) 015104

    2021

  63. [66]

    Alfonso, A

    K. Alfonso, A. Armatol, C. Augier, F.T.A. III, O. Azzolini, A.S. Barabash et al.,Sensitivity of the cupid experiment to0νββdecay of 100Mo,2504.14369

    arXiv

  64. [67]

    Bonilla and A

    C. Bonilla and A. Layana-Ramirez,Neutrino Masses and Dark Matter Stability in 3HDMs with Minimal Non-Abelian Discrete Symmetries,2607.07853

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [68]

    Vien and H.N

    V.V. Vien and H.N. Long,TheD 4 flavor symmetry in 3-3-1 model with neutral leptons,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A28(2013) 1350159

    2013

  66. [69]

    Grimus, A

    W. Grimus, A. Joshipura, S. Kaneko, L. Lavoura and M. Tanimoto,Lepton mixing angle θ13 = 0with a horizontal symmetryD 4,Journal of High Energy Physics2004(2004) 078–078

    2004

  67. [70]

    Khater, A

    W. Khater, A. Kunˇ cinas, O.M. Ogreid, P. Osland and M.N. Rebelo,Dark matter in three-higgs-doublet models with s3 symmetry,Journal of High Energy Physics2022(2022)

    2022

  68. [71]

    Kunˇ cinas, O

    A. Kunˇ cinas, O. Ogreid, P. Osland and M. Rebelo,Dark matter in a CP-violating three-higgs-doublet model withS 3 symmetry,Physical Review D106(2022)

    2022

  69. [72]

    Vien,B−Lextension of the Standard Model withQ 6 symmetry,Nuclear Physics B956 (2020) 115015

    V. Vien,B−Lextension of the Standard Model withQ 6 symmetry,Nuclear Physics B956 (2020) 115015

    2020

  70. [73]

    Araki and Y.F

    T. Araki and Y.F. Li,Q 6 flavor symmetry model for the extension of the minimal standard model by three right-handed sterile neutrinos,Physical Review D85(2012)

    2012

  71. [74]

    Kajiyama, J

    Y. Kajiyama, J. Kubo and H. Okada,D 6 family symmetry and cold dark matter at cern lhc, Physical Review D75(2007) . – 34 –

    2007