pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19125 · v1 · pith:NF7B7WLGnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · 🪐 quant-ph

Rotational Quantum Tunneling of a Magnetic Dipole in a Superconducting Trap

Francis J. Headley , Fabian M\"uller , Emre K\"ose , Tim Fuchs , Hendrik Ulbricht , Daniel Braun This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 10:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords rotational tunnelingquantum tunnelingnano-magnetsuperconducting trapdecoherencerest-gas scatteringrotational symmetrymagnetic dipole
0
0 comments X

The pith

A nano-magnet shaped with near-perfect rotational symmetry can tunnel through a magnetic barrier in a superconducting trap while resisting decoherence from rest-gas scattering.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper models a nano-magnet as a magnetic dipole pinned along its easy axis inside a superconducting trap that creates a potential barrier to rotation. Quantum tunneling through that barrier is possible in principle, but rest-gas scattering at low temperatures would normally destroy the coherence of the rotational states. The authors show that making the particle's shape sufficiently close to perfect rotational symmetry around the axis equalizes the scattering rates for different orientations and thereby protects the tunneling. They identify concrete parameter ranges for particle size, trap strength, and temperature where the tunneling rate should exceed the decoherence rate and become observable.

Core claim

The rotational degree of freedom of a magnetic dipole in a superconducting trap experiences a potential barrier but can tunnel through it quantum-mechanically. At low temperatures the dominant decoherence channel is rest-gas scattering, whose orientation dependence can be suppressed by fabricating the particle with rotational symmetry about its magnetization axis that is high enough to make the scattering rates for the relevant states nearly identical. In experimentally accessible regimes of trap depth, particle moment of inertia, and background pressure, the tunneling splitting then exceeds the decoherence rate and rotational quantum tunneling should be observable.

What carries the argument

Rotational symmetry of the nano-magnet that equalizes orientation-dependent rest-gas scattering rates and thereby protects the coherence of the tunneling states between opposite orientations.

If this is right

  • Rotational quantum tunneling becomes a feasible observable in existing superconducting trap setups once particles reach the required symmetry.
  • Rest-gas scattering dominates decoherence at low temperature, so vacuum quality sets the main experimental limit.
  • The tunneling rate depends on the moment of inertia and trap barrier height, both of which are tunable by particle size and trap current.
  • Observing the effect would demonstrate macroscopic quantum coherence in a rotational degree of freedom.
  • The same symmetry-protection principle could apply to other orientation-sensitive decoherence channels.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The result suggests that symmetry engineering could be a general strategy for protecting other macroscopic quantum degrees of freedom in levitated particles.
  • It connects to ongoing work on quantum rotors and orientational superpositions in optomechanics and ion traps.
  • A direct test would be to compare tunneling visibility in particles fabricated with deliberately varied degrees of rotational asymmetry.
  • If confirmed, the setup offers a route to studying quantum-to-classical transitions specifically for rotational motion.

Load-bearing premise

The particle can be made with rotational symmetry high enough that orientation-dependent scattering rates become negligible compared with the tunneling rate.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures the rotational decoherence rate in particles of controlled but increasing asymmetry and finds that the rate does not drop as symmetry improves, or that fails to detect the predicted tunneling splitting at the calculated parameters, would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19125 by Daniel Braun, Emre K\"ose, Fabian M\"uller, Francis J. Headley, Hendrik Ulbricht, Tim Fuchs.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Sketch of the setup. A nanomagnet, ideally of spher [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Energy spectrum (in units of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Figs. (a), (b) and (c) describes the potentials without any external field, and with external fields parallel and per [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Visibility and tunneling rate for the rotational double [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Decoherence of rotational tunneling for different system-environment coupling operators: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Gas-scattering decoherence of rotational tunneling in the field-free case ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Boundary of the tunneling regime in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the quantum dynamics of the rotational degree of freedom of a nano-magnet trapped in a superconducting trap. The nano-magnet is modeled as a magnetic dipole with magnetization pinned to the easy axis of the particle. The magnetic trap then leads to a potential barrier that hinders free rotation of the particle, but through which it can tunnel. We identified rest-gas scattering as the most important decoherence mechanism at low temperatures. A shape of the particle sufficiently close to perfect rotational symmetry about the rotational axis can protect the rotational tunneling against this decoherence mechanism, and we identify experimentally feasible parameter regimes where rotational tunneling should be observable.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper models a nano-magnet as a magnetic dipole with magnetization fixed along its easy axis, trapped in a superconducting potential that creates a rotational barrier through which quantum tunneling can occur. It identifies rest-gas scattering as the dominant decoherence mechanism at low temperatures and argues that a particle shape with near-perfect rotational symmetry about the axis suppresses the orientation-dependent component of this scattering, thereby protecting the tunneling coherence. The authors identify specific, experimentally feasible parameter regimes in which rotational tunneling should become observable.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the work would provide a concrete proposal for observing rotational quantum tunneling in a mesoscopic magnetic object, extending quantum mechanics into rotational degrees of freedom for levitated systems. The symmetry-protection strategy against a specific decoherence channel is a potentially useful design principle for future experiments in quantum magnetomechanics or levitated optomechanics. The identification of concrete parameter regimes strengthens the experimental relevance, though this hinges on the unverified dominance of the modeled decoherence source.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and decoherence analysis] Abstract (final paragraph) and the decoherence section: the assertion that rest-gas scattering is the dominant mechanism at low T is stated without quantitative comparison to competing channels such as Johnson noise from the superconductor, residual magnetic-field fluctuations, or trap-induced electric gradients. Because the symmetry-protection argument and the claim of observable tunneling both rest on this dominance, the absence of rate comparisons or an error budget is load-bearing for the central feasibility conclusion.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model section] The potential barrier and tunneling-rate derivation would benefit from an explicit equation or figure showing the angular dependence and the WKB or instanton approximation used.
  2. [Throughout] Notation for the rotational symmetry parameter and the scattering cross-section anisotropy should be defined consistently between text and any supplementary material.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below and will strengthen the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and decoherence analysis] Abstract (final paragraph) and the decoherence section: the assertion that rest-gas scattering is the dominant mechanism at low T is stated without quantitative comparison to competing channels such as Johnson noise from the superconductor, residual magnetic-field fluctuations, or trap-induced electric gradients. Because the symmetry-protection argument and the claim of observable tunneling both rest on this dominance, the absence of rate comparisons or an error budget is load-bearing for the central feasibility conclusion.

    Authors: We agree that explicit rate comparisons are needed to substantiate the dominance of rest-gas scattering. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection to the decoherence analysis that provides order-of-magnitude estimates for Johnson noise from the superconducting surfaces, residual magnetic-field fluctuations, and trap-induced electric-field gradients, using the same experimental parameters already employed for the rest-gas calculation. These estimates will be collected into a simple error budget that shows rest-gas scattering remains the leading channel at the temperatures and pressures considered. The symmetry-protection argument and the feasibility claim will then rest on this quantitative comparison rather than on the prior qualitative statement. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation uses standard QM modeling and physical estimates without self-referential reductions

full rationale

The paper models the nano-magnet as a pinned magnetic dipole in a superconducting trap potential, applies standard quantum tunneling through a barrier, and identifies rest-gas scattering as the leading decoherence channel at low T via conventional rate estimates. It then argues that near-perfect rotational symmetry suppresses orientation-dependent scattering rates enough for observable tunneling in feasible regimes. None of these steps reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes smuggled from prior work; the central claim rests on independent physical modeling and parameter regimes that can be checked against external benchmarks such as measured gas-scattering cross-sections and trap frequencies. No load-bearing uniqueness theorem or prediction is forced by the result itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; full derivation, parameter values, and explicit assumptions are unavailable. The ledger therefore records only the minimal assumptions stated in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Magnetization is pinned to the easy axis of the particle
    Stated in the second sentence of the abstract as the modeling choice for the nano-magnet.
  • domain assumption Rest-gas scattering is the most important decoherence mechanism at low temperatures
    Explicitly identified in the abstract as the dominant channel that symmetry must protect against.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5646 in / 1337 out tokens · 42415 ms · 2026-05-20T10:10:44.348529+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Kollmar and B

    A. Kollmar and B. Alefeld, Rotational tunneling, inPro- ceedings of the Conference on Neutron Scattering, Vol. 1, edited by R. M. Moon (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Gatlinburg, USA, 1976)

    work page 1976

  2. [2]

    Hüller, Rotational tunneling in solids: The theory of neutron scattering, Phys

    A. Hüller, Rotational tunneling in solids: The theory of neutron scattering, Phys. Rev. B16, 1844 (1977)

    work page 1977

  3. [3]

    Hüller and W

    A. Hüller and W. Press, Rotational tunneling in solids: Theory of neutron scattering. II., Phys. Rev. B24, 17 (1981)

    work page 1981

  4. [4]

    K. W. H. Stevens, The theory of planar methyl rotation, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.16, 5765 (1983)

    work page 1983

  5. [5]

    Häusler and A

    W. Häusler and A. Hüller, Tunneling of coupled methyl groups, Z. Physik B - Condensed Matter59, 177 (1985)

    work page 1985

  6. [6]

    Häusler,Zur Temperaturabhängigkeit des Rotation- stunnelns, Ph.D

    W. Häusler,Zur Temperaturabhängigkeit des Rotation- stunnelns, Ph.D. thesis, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (1989)

    work page 1989

  7. [7]

    Braun and U

    D. Braun and U. Weiss, Dynamics of the damped rota- tional tunneling system: The effect of librational excita- tions, Z. Physik B - Condensed Matter92, 507 (1993)

    work page 1993

  8. [8]

    Braun and U

    D. Braun and U. Weiss, Rotational tunnelling and libra- tional excitations: The loss of quantum coherence, Phys- ica B202, 264 (1994)

    work page 1994

  9. [9]

    Zhong and F

    C. Zhong and F. Robicheaux, Decoherence of rotational degrees of freedom, Phys. Rev. A94, 052109 (2016)

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    B. A. Stickler, B. Papendell, S. Kuhn, B. Schrinski, J. Millen, M. Arndt, and K. Hornberger, Probing macro- scopic quantum superpositions with nanorotors, New J. Phys.20, 122001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Martinetz, K

    L. Martinetz, K. Hornberger, J. Millen, M. S. Kim, and B. A. Stickler, Quantum electromechanics with levitated nanoparticles, npj Quantum Inf6, 101 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Gonzalez-Ballestero, M

    C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, M. Aspelmeyer, L. Novotny, R. Quidant, and O. Romero-Isart, Levitodynamics: Lev- itation and control of microscopic objects in vacuum, Sci- ence374, eabg3027 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Vinante, C

    A. Vinante, C. Timberlake, and H. Ulbricht, Levitated Micromagnets in Superconducting Traps: A New Plat- form for Tabletop Fundamental Physics Experiments, Entropy24, 1642 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    J. S. Pedernales, F. Cosco, and M. B. Plenio, Decoherence-Free Rotational Degrees of Freedom for Quantum Applications, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 090501 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    Carlesso, H

    M. Carlesso, H. R. Naeij, and A. Bassi, Perturbative al- gorithm for rotational decoherence, Phys. Rev. A103, 032220 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    B. A. Stickler, K. Hornberger, and M. S. Kim, Quantum rotations of nanoparticles, Nat Rev Phys3, 589 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Glikin, B

    N. Glikin, B. A. Stickler, R. Tollefsen, S. Mouradian, N. Yadav, E. Urban, K. Hornberger, and H. Häffner, Probing Rotational Decoherence with a Trapped-Ion Pla- nar Rotor, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 033601 (2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Barbara and W

    B. Barbara and W. Wernsdorfer, Quantum tunneling ef- fect in magnetic particles, Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science2, 220 (1997)

    work page 1997

  19. [19]

    Wernsdorfer, N

    W. Wernsdorfer, N. Aliaga-Alcalde, D. N. Hendrickson, and G. Christou, Exchange-biased quantum tunnelling in a supramolecular dimer of single-molecule magnets, Nature416, 406 (2002)

    work page 2002

  20. [20]

    Wernsdorfer, Classical and Quantum Magnetization Reversal Studied in Nanometer-Sized Particles and Clus- ters,inHandbook of Advanced Magnetic Materials,edited by Y

    W. Wernsdorfer, Classical and Quantum Magnetization Reversal Studied in Nanometer-Sized Particles and Clus- ters,inHandbook of Advanced Magnetic Materials,edited by Y. Liu, D. J. Sellmyer, and D. Shindo (Springer US, Boston, MA, 2006) pp. 77–127

    work page 2006

  21. [21]

    E. C. Stoner and E. P. Wohlfarth, A mechanism of mag- netic hysteresis in heterogeneous alloys, Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci240, 599 (1948)

    work page 1948

  22. [22]

    Braun, Exact activation energy of magnetic single do- main particles, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Ma- terials283, 1 (2004)

    D. Braun, Exact activation energy of magnetic single do- main particles, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Ma- terials283, 1 (2004)

    work page 2004

  23. [23]

    B. A. Stickler, B. Schrinski, and K. Hornberger, Rota- tional Friction and Diffusion of Quantum Rotors, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 040401 (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    B. A. Stickler, B. Papendell, and K. Hornberger, Spatio- orientational decoherence of nanoparticles, Phys. Rev. A 94, 033828 (2016)

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Carney, P

    D. Carney, P. C. E. Stamp, and J. M. Taylor, Tabletop experiments for quantum gravity: a user’s manual, Class. Quantum Grav.36, 034001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, G. W. Morley, H. Ulbricht, M. Toroš, M. Paternostro, A. A. Geraci, P. F. Barker, M. S. Kim, and G. Milburn, Spin Entanglement Wit- ness for Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 240401 (2017). 12

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    F. J. Headley, A. Belenchia, M. Paternostro, and D. Braun, Quantum Metrology of Newton’s Con- stant with Levitated Mechanical Systems (2026), arXiv:2503.16215 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    F. J. Headley, Magnetic dipole trapping potential be- tween infinite superconducting plates, Phys. Scr.100, 085905 (2025)

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    T. M. Fuchs, D. G. Uitenbroek, J. Plugge, N. van Hal- teren, J.-P. van Soest, A. Vinante, H. Ulbricht, and T. H. Oosterkamp, Measuring gravity with milligram levitated masses, Sci. Adv.10, eadk2949 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Timberlake, G

    C. Timberlake, G. Gasbarri, A. Vinante, A. Setter, and H. Ulbricht, Acceleration sensing with magnetically lev- itated oscillators above a superconductor, Appl. Phys. Lett.115, 224101 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Vinante, P

    A. Vinante, P. Falferi, G. Gasbarri, A. Setter, C. Tim- berlake, and H. Ulbricht, Ultralow Mechanical Damp- ing with Meissner-Levitated Ferromagnetic Microparti- cles, Phys. Rev. Appl.13, 064027 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Müller,Decoherence effects for Mesoscopic Ferromag- nets, Master’s thesis, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübin- gen, Tübingen (2025), master’s thesis

    F. Müller,Decoherence effects for Mesoscopic Ferromag- nets, Master’s thesis, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübin- gen, Tübingen (2025), master’s thesis

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Ahrens, W

    F. Ahrens, W. Ji, D. Budker, C. Timberlake, H. Ulbricht, and A. Vinante, Levitated Ferromagnetic Magnetometer with Energy Resolution Well Belowℏ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 110801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, 2007)

    work page 2007

  35. [35]

    Braun, F

    D. Braun, F. Haake, and W. T. Strunz, Universality of Decoherence, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 2913 (2001)

    work page 2001

  36. [36]

    W. T. Strunz, F. Haake, and D. Braun, Universality of decoherence for macroscopic quantum superpositions, Phys. Rev. A67, 022101 (2003)

    work page 2003

  37. [37]

    Papendell, B

    B. Papendell, B. A. Stickler, and K. Hornberger, Quan- tum angular momentum diffusion of rigid bodies, New J. Phys.19, 122001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    A. Wex, J. Rothe, L. Peters,et al.(NUCLEUS), Decou- pling Pulse Tube Vibrations from a Dry Dilution Refrig- erator at milli-Kelvin Temperatures, JINST20, P05022

    work page

  39. [39]

    de Wit, G

    M. de Wit, G. Welker, K. Heeck, F. M. Buters, H. J. Eerkens, G. Koning, H. van der Meer, D. Bouwmeester, and T. H. Oosterkamp, Vibration isolation with high thermal conductance for a cryogen-free dilution refrig- erator, Rev. Sci. Instrum.90, 015112 (2019)

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    Landau, E

    L. Landau, E. Lifshitz, and L. Pitaevskii,Electrodynam- ics of Continuous Media: Volume 8, Course of theoretical physics (Elsevier Science, 1995)

    work page 1995

  41. [41]

    Tinkham,Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed

    M. Tinkham,Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, 1996)

    work page 1996

  42. [42]

    London and F

    H. London and F. London, The electromagnetic equa- tions of the supraconductor, Proc. A149, 71 (1935)

    work page 1935

  43. [43]

    C. J. Gorter and H. B. G. Casimir, On supraconductivity i, Physica1, 306 (1934)

    work page 1934

  44. [44]

    J. P. Turneaure, J. Halbritter, and H. A. Schwettman, The Surface Impedance of Superconductors and Normal Conductors: The Mattis-Bardeen Theory, J Supercond 4, 341 (1991)

    work page 1991

  45. [45]

    W. M. Isbell, V. R. Christman, and S. G. Babcock,Mea- surements of Dynamic Properties of Materials. Volume VI: Tantalum,FinalReportMSL-70-23, Vol.VI(General Motors Corporation, General Motors Technical Center, Materials and Structures Laboratory, Warren, Michigan,

    work page

  46. [46]

    also reported as DASA 2501-6

    work page

  47. [47]

    Romero-Isart, L

    O. Romero-Isart, L. Clemente, C. Navau, A. Sanchez, and J. I. Cirac, Quantum Magnetomechanics with Lev- itating Superconducting Microspheres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 147205 (2012). 13 TABLE II. Physical correspondence for the parameters consideringNd2Fe14B Quantity Physical Value Dimensionless Radius,R1.0×10 −9 m Length,L8.4×10 −8 m Density,ρ7.5×10 3 kgm −3...

    work page 2012

  48. [48]

    (B29) we truncate the Hilbert space to angular-momentum states|n⟩,n= −N,

    Numerical implementation in the angular-momentum basis For the numerical solution of Eq. (B29) we truncate the Hilbert space to angular-momentum states|n⟩,n= −N, . . . ,+N, defined in Eq. (A1). In this basis the rotor HamiltonianHsys is represented by a finite matrixHnm and the operators in Eq. (B3) have simple analytic matrix elements (e.g.cosθcouplesnto...

    work page

  49. [49]

    DiagonalizeH sys to obtain eigenvaluesEm and eigenvectors|ψ m⟩

    work page

  50. [50]

    Compute the matrix elementsS(α) mn =⟨ψ m|S(α)|ψn⟩

    work page

  51. [51]

    Construct the spectral componentsS(α)(ω)in the energy basis as in Eq. (B13). In the numerical implementation, Bohr frequencies that agree within a chosen numerical tolerance are assigned to the same frequency

    work page

  52. [52]

    For each nonzero Bohr frequencyω̸= 0, evaluate the transition rate, with the spectral density replaced with an effective coupling constantΓα, γα(ω) = Γα ( nα(|ω|) + 1, ω >0, nα(|ω|), ω <0. (B33)

    work page

  53. [53]

    For a super-Ohmic bath,Jα(ω)∼ω 3, the productJ α(ω)nα(ω)∼ω 2 vanishes asω→0, soγ α(0) = 0even at finite temperature

    The zero-frequency contribution is treated separately, For an Ohmic bathJα(ω)∼η O ωat low frequency, while for smallωwe haven α(ω)∼(k BTα)/(ℏω).Then forω→0 +, γα(ω) = 2πJα(ω) ℏ2 [2nα(ω) + 1]≈ 2πηOω ℏ2 · 2kBTα ℏω +O(ω) = 4πηOkBTα ℏ3 +O(ω),(B34) and hence γα(0)≡lim ω→0 γα(ω) = 4πηOkBTα ℏ3 (B35) for an Ohmic bath at finite temperature. For a super-Ohmic bath...

    work page

  54. [54]

    The jump operators passed to the master-equation solver are then Lα,ω = p γα(ω)S (α)(ω),(B36) The resulting set{Lα,ω}is given as collapse operators to the master-equation solver. Because this construction is performed entirely in the energy eigenbasis ofHsys, it is fully consistent with the Born-Markov-secular derivation and automatically incorporates the...

    work page

  55. [55]

    The relevant phonon wavelength at the tunneling frequency and typical librational frequencies is much larger than the size of the trap

    Acoustic phonons We treat the superconductor as an isotropic elastic continuum with mass densityρs, longitudinal sound velocitycl, and transverse sound velocityct. The relevant phonon wavelength at the tunneling frequency and typical librational frequencies is much larger than the size of the trap. Thus, the particle only reacts to a change in the separat...

    work page

  56. [56]

    bath mode

    Seismic noise Classical vibrations displace the trap center byz→z+δz(t). Expanding thez 2-dependent part of the trapping potential around the equilibrium position,z= 0, givesB(θ)δz 2. Hence, the interaction Hamiltonian for the seismic noise is H(vib) int = KV0 L2 (3 + cos 2θ)δz2 = KV0 L2 cos 2θ δz2 + 3KV0 L2 δz2.(E23) The second term in the r.h.s. of (E23...

    work page