Kaon Modification in Pion Medium

Yu. B. Ivanov

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 19 references

Kaon Modification in Pion Medium

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes that in a combined pion-nucleon medium the pion field gives no direct kaon mass shift and only rescales the baryon-induced modification by a factor no larger than 1.05 at freeze-out.

desk verdict A short, honest estimate that pion matter only rescales baryon-induced kaon modification by ≤5% at freeze-out; the factor-2 normalization slip in ⟨π²⟩ needs fixing but doesn't change the verdict. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.00819 v2 pith:NMW6ULGS submitted 2025-02-02 nucl-th hep-ph

Yu. B. Ivanov This is my paper · ORCID

classification nucl-thhep-ph

keywords kaonin-mediummodificationpionmediumheavy-ioncollisionschiralLagrangianmean-fieldapproximationkaon-nucleoninteractionfreeze-outconditionsenhancementfactor

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

In high-energy heavy-ion collisions a kaon travels through a medium containing both nucleons and a dense pion gas. Baryonic matter is known to modify kaon and antikaon masses and energies, but the additional role of pions had not been quantified in the combined medium. The paper claims that pions do not shift kaon properties directly: the pion expectation value only rescales every baryon-induced term by $F_\pi = (1 - \langle\pi^2\rangle/(4f_\pi^2))^{-1}$. Evaluating the pion scalar density at freeze-out conditions extracted from the statistical model, the author finds $F_\pi \le 1.05$ over the collision-energy range, so the pion effect is at most a 5 percent enhancement at freeze-out. Because pion density is higher before freeze-out, the paper notes the accumulated effect during kaon evolution could be larger than this freeze-out estimate.

What carries the argument

The central object is the enhancement factor $F_\pi = (1 - \langle\pi^2\rangle/(4f_\pi^2))^{-1}$, a wavefunction-renormalization-like factor built from the pion scalar density $\langle\pi^2\rangle = \rho_\pi^S/(2m_\pi)$, where $\rho_\pi^S$ is computed from the thermal Bose distribution of the three pion species. Its role is to absorb the effect of the pion expectation value that multiplies the kaon kinetic-plus-mass operator in Eq. (3); factoring that prefactor out leaves the standard baryon terms rescaled by $F_\pi$. The derivation also requires discarding the bracket term $(1/(4f_\pi^2))(m_\pi^2\langle\pi^2\rangle + \langle\pi\partial_\mu\partial^\mu\pi\rangle)$, which the author argues carries extra smallness, either through $\langle \bar K K\rangle/\langle\pi^2\rangle \ll 1$ or through a factor $(\langle\pi^2\rangle/(4f_\pi^2))^2$.

What would settle it

Compute the omitted bracket term using the pion equation of motion in a time-dependent model of the dense early stage; if $(1/(4f_\pi^2))(m_\pi^2\langle\pi^2\rangle + \langle\pi\partial_\mu\partial^\mu\pi\rangle)$ ever reaches a few percent of $m_K^2$, or if $\langle \bar K K\rangle/\langle\pi^2\rangle$ is not very small, the factorized $F_\pi$ formula fails. On the experimental side, measure kaon and antikaon mass shifts (or $\phi \to K^+K^-$ yields) as a function of pion multiplicity at fixed baryon density: strict scaling with baryon density times $F_\pi$ supports the claim, while an additional pion-density term would refute it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in a combined pion-nucleon medium the pion field does not add an independent term to the kaon dispersion relation. Starting from the chiral nucleon-kaon-pion Lagrangian (1) and applying the mean-field approximation to the nucleon and pion fields, the kaon Klein-Gordon equation becomes the kaon-in-nucleon-matter equation with every baryon term multiplied by $F_\pi$. The resulting dispersion relation is $\omega^2 = m_K^2 + k^2 - F_\pi(\Sigma_{KN}/f_K^2)\rho_S \pm 3F_\pi\rho_N\omega/(4f_K^2)$, with the sign distinguishing $K$ and $\bar K$; the same $F_\pi$ multiplies the scalar attraction and the vector density term. Computing $\langle\pi^2\rangle$ from the pion Bose distribution at freeze-out temperatures and baryon chemical potentials from the statistical model gives $F_\pi \le 1.05$ from low to high collision energies (Fig. 1), which the author reads as retroactive support for neglecting the bracket term in Eq. (3).

Load-bearing premise

The result depends on neglecting the bracket term $(1/(4f_\pi^2))(m_\pi^2\langle\pi^2\rangle + \langle\pi\partial_\mu\partial^\mu\pi\rangle)$ in the kaon Klein-Gordon equation, an omission justified only by an 'extra smallness' estimate; if that term is not negligible in the dense early stage, pions would shift kaon masses directly and the $F_\pi$-only picture would collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

At freeze-out, the pion medium can be omitted as a direct source of kaon modification; baryon-driven kaon and antikaon shifts need only be scaled by at most 1.05.
The same factor multiplies both the scalar-density attraction and the vector-density term, so the kaon-antikaon splitting retains its baryon-dominated structure.
In the earlier, pion-denser stage of a collision, the enhancement factor is larger, so a full accounting of in-medium kaon modification should apply $F_\pi$ along the evolution path, not only at freeze-out.
The result supplies a compact one-parameter correction from an established Lagrangian, so existing kaon-in-nucleon-medium calculations can be upgraded by inserting $F_\pi$ rather than by introducing new physics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

An implicit consequence the paper does not develop is that $F_\pi$ also renormalizes kaon propagation, so in-medium kaon velocities and currents, not just masses, are slightly altered; this could show up in kaon flow or in $\phi \to K^+K^-$ decays inside pion-rich matter.
The same factorization should apply to other mesons whose kinetic terms couple to $\pi^2$, such as $D$ mesons in a pion gas; checking the size and sign of their $F_\pi$-like prefactor would test whether the mechanism is generic.
A concrete extension is to integrate $F_\pi(t)$ along heavy-ion trajectories using time-dependent temperature and baryon density; if the time-integrated enhancement exceeds the few-percent freeze-out value, kaon and antikaon spectra and flow at high collision energies should deviate systematically from baryon-only transport predictions.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear colleague,

The thing to know: this is a small, self-contained calculation with a clear negative result. Ivanov shows that, in the chiral mean-field treatment, a thermal pion gas does not directly shift the kaon mass but instead multiplies the baryon-induced kaon potential by Fπ = (1 − ⟨π²⟩/4fπ²)⁻¹, and at freeze-out this factor is at most ~1.05 across collision energies. That is a useful message for heavy-ion modelers: at freeze-out, pion corrections to baryon-mediated kaon modification are negligible, though they may accumulate earlier.

What is new: the explicit Fπ formula for a zero-chemical-potential pion-nucleon medium, and the numerical bound. The derivation follows Ref. [9] (Bose-condensed pions) and extends it to the thermal case. The algebra from the Lagrangian to Eq. (6) is standard and internally consistent. The paper is honest about its own limitations: the Lagrangian is semi-quantitative, and the author says so.

Soft spots. The neglect of the bracket in Eq. (3) is argued via the pion equation of motion rather than shown by an explicit order-by-order calculation. The stress-test note worries that this is a one-loop tadpole contribution that can't be dropped. On closer reading, the worry doesn't land: for free on-shell thermal pions, mπ²⟨π²⟩ + ⟨π∂²π⟩ vanishes identically, and the only pion-induced piece at this order is the wavefunction renormalization, which cancels in the on-shell dispersion relation. A cleaner statement of that cancellation would improve the paper, but the conclusion survives. The real soft spot is Eq. (9): the thermal average ⟨π²⟩ is written with 1/(2ω) in the integrand, which is half the canonical thermal fluctuation nB/ω. That makes the plotted 5% bound uncertain by about a factor of two — the bound should be closer to 10% if corrected. That is minor for the qualitative conclusion but should be fixed before publication. There are also no uncertainty bands on Fig. 1.

Who it's for: heavy-ion modelers working on strangeness production and transport. It's a legitimate contribution, not a major one. It deserves a serious referee; the numerical slip is fixable and the central claim likely holds up.

Recommendation: send it to review, and ask for a corrected ⟨π²⟩ and a more explicit treatment of the neglected bracket.

Best, [Your name]

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the modification of kaon properties in a thermal pion-nucleon medium, using a chiral nucleon-kaon-pion Lagrangian. In the rest frame of a homogeneous and stationary medium, and after neglecting a term in the kaon Klein-Gordon equation, the authors find that the pion medium does not produce a direct kaon mass shift but only rescales the baryon-induced terms by the factor Fπ = (1 − ⟨π²⟩/(4fπ²))⁻¹. The dispersion relation is then used to estimate Fπ at the freeze-out stage of heavy-ion collisions, using freeze-out temperatures and baryon chemical potentials from statistical model fits. The numerical result is Fπ ≤ 1.05, and the paper concludes that the pion medium at freeze-out is a small correction to the baryon-induced modification, although the effect may accumulate before freeze-out.

Significance. If the result is correct, the paper provides a simple and non-trivial statement: at the level of the mean-field/tadpole approximation, pion matter acts on kaons only through wavefunction renormalization, enhancing the baryon effects by a factor Fπ rather than shifting the kaon mass directly. This is a useful clarification for heavy-ion transport models, and the derivation is self-contained and does not use kaon data to fix parameters. The main numerical claim is a 5% enhancement at freeze-out. However, this quantitative claim is affected by a factor-of-two error in the thermal pion fluctuation (Eq. (9)), and the justification for omitting a key term in the equation of motion is only sketched. The qualitative conclusion of a small effect is likely robust, but the paper in its current form does not fully support the specific 5% bound.

major comments (2)

[Section 2, Eq. (9)] Equation (9) evaluates the thermal pion fluctuation as ⟨π²⟩ = g ∫ d³k/(2π)^3 n_B(ω)/(2ω). For a real scalar field with the canonical kinetic term, the thermal part of the field variance is ⟨π²⟩_T = g ∫ d³k/(2π)^3 n_B(ω)/ω, i.e., a factor of 2 larger. Using the corrected expression increases ε and hence Fπ − 1 by roughly a factor of 2, so the maximum enhancement at freeze-out is approximately 10% rather than 5%. The qualitative conclusion that the effect is small survives, but the quantitative central claim stated in the abstract and Fig. 1 needs revision.
[Section 2, Eq. (3) and following paragraph] The neglect of the term (1/(4fπ²))(mπ²⟨π²⟩ + ⟨π∂μ∂μπ⟩) in Eq. (3) is load-bearing, because if this term is not negligible the pion medium would directly shift the kaon mass and the central claim would collapse. The provided justification is not a calculation: the estimate proportional to (⟨\bar K K⟩/4fπ²)(⟨π²⟩/4fπ²) is appropriate for a background kaon density rather than for a single test kaon in a pion gas with vanishing kaon density, and the alternative estimate with the Weinberg term refers to a term not present in Lagrangian (1). If the pion gas is treated as free, ⟨π∂²π⟩ = −mπ²⟨π²⟩ and the bracket vanishes exactly; the text should state this explicitly. Alternatively, the authors should provide a quantitative estimate of the omitted contribution at finite temperature, for example the one-loop pion contribution to the kaon self-energy.

minor comments (4)

[Section 3, paragraph after Fig. 1] The sentence 'This retroactively confirms the approximations made at derivation of Eq. (10)' is imprecise: the smallness of ε is not by itself a check of the separate approximation of dropping the bracket term in Eq. (3).
[Abstract and Conclusion] The final sentence of the abstract states that the effect can be higher before freeze-out, but the body gives no estimate; a quantitative bound based on the maximum pion density reached in the evolution would make this caveat concrete.
[Throughout] The conclusion that the pion medium does not produce a substantive contribution should be restricted to the real part of the mean-field self-energy; the broadening effect found in a purely pionic medium in Ref. [8] is not addressed in this paper.
[Presentation] There are several presentation issues: 'approximately equalsfπ' is missing a space; Eq. (8) has a missing closing parenthesis after 'four-momentum'; and the text should indicate which of the freeze-out parameterizations (T(μB) and μB(√s)) is taken from Ref. [17] and which from Ref. [18].

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity detected: the pion-enhancement factor is a direct algebraic consequence of the stated Lagrangian plus external freeze-out parameters, with no kaon-fitted input and no load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained: Eq. (6) and the enhancement factor Fpi = (1 - <pi^2>/(4 f_pi^2))^{-1} follow algebraically from the mean-field Klein-Gordon equation (3) once the bracketed direct-pion term is dropped, and the numerical bound Fpi <= 1.05 is obtained by inserting freeze-out temperatures and baryon chemical potentials taken from independent statistical-model fits [17,18]; no kaon property is used to calibrate any parameter, and no predicted quantity is fed back into the model. The paper cites no prior work of its own author as the basis for the central claim; Ref. [9] is external to the present author. The dropped bracket in Eq. (3) is a questionable approximation, since the paper's 'extra smallness' estimate is order-of-magnitude rather than a derivation, but that is a correctness risk, not circularity: the conclusion that pions only rescale baryon effects is conditional on that explicit approximation, not secretly assumed in defining Fpi. The closing statement that the small Fpi retroactively confirms the approximation is a consistency check, not a load-bearing circular inference. The numerical evaluation relies only on externally fitted freeze-out parameters, so the central quantitative claim is not forced by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on two types of inputs: (i) the chiral Lagrangian and mean-field approximation, which are standard but include a model-dependent factor and a neglected term, and (ii) five statistical-model coefficients fitted to heavy-ion freeze-out data, which set the temperature scale. No new entities are introduced. The main numerical result is therefore an estimate rather than a first-principles constant.

free parameters (2)

Freeze-out temperature polynomial coefficients a, b, c = a = 0.166 GeV, b = 0.139 GeV^-1, c = 0.053 GeV^-3
T(μB) from Refs. [17,18] is fitted to statistical model analyses of heavy-ion data. It sets the temperature used in Eq. (9) to compute ⟨π²⟩ and hence Fπ in Fig. 1.
Baryon chemical potential fit parameters d, e = d = 1.308 GeV, e = 0.273 GeV^-1
μB(√s_NN) from Ref. [17] determines the baryon chemical potential at each collision energy, which enters T(μB) and thus the Fπ estimate.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption The chiral nucleon-kaon-pion Lagrangian (1), with the stated 1/2 factor for scalar pion fields, correctly describes the low-energy interactions relevant for kaon modification.
The derivation of the Klein-Gordon equation starts from this Lagrangian; the extra 1/2 factor relative to Refs. [9,11] is asserted without derivation.
domain assumption Mean-field approximation: nucleon and pion fields in operator products are replaced by their thermal expectation values (ρN, ρS, ⟨π²⟩).
Used to go from the Euler-Lagrange equation to Eq. (3); this ignores fluctuations and correlations beyond the mean fields.
ad hoc to paper The term (1/(4fπ²))(mπ²⟨π²⟩ + ⟨π∂μ∂μπ⟩) in Eq. (3) is negligible.
Justified by the 'extra smallness' estimates ⟨\bar K K⟩/⟨π²⟩ ≪ 1 or (⟨π²⟩/(4fπ²))²; this is the key approximation that reduces the pion effect to the multiplicative factor Fπ.
domain assumption The medium is homogeneous, stationary, and at rest (J = 0).
Assumed to simplify Eq. (3) to Eq. (6) and to define ⟨π²⟩ as a function of temperature only.
domain assumption Pions form a free Bose-Einstein gas at temperature T; pion-nucleon interactions and pion broadening are omitted.
Eq. (9) uses the free pion spectral function; the πN interaction is dropped as irrelevant to the kaon self-energy in this model.
domain assumption Freeze-out conditions are described by the statistical-model parameterizations T(μB) and μB(√s_NN) from Refs. [17,18].
These fitted relations provide the numerical T and μB used to evaluate Fπ at freeze-out; they are external inputs, not derived in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Kaon Modification in Pion Medium." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NMW6ULGS

@misc{pith2026250200819,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Kaon Modification in Pion Medium},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NMW6ULGS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.00819}
}

read the original abstract

Kaon properties in thermal pion-nucleon medium are studied. The dense pion-nucleon medium is produced in high-energy heavy-ion collisions. The consideration is based on the chiral nucleon-kaon-pion Lagrangian. It is found that the pion medium does not produce a substantive contribution but enhances the effect of the baryon matter. Numerical estimate shows that this enhancement factor induced by the pion medium does not exceed 5% at the freeze-out stage of heavy-ion collisions, i.e. it is small. However, the impact of this enhancement can be higher in actual nuclear collisions because the effect of the in-medium (anti)kaon modification is accumulated during the (anti)kaon evolution before the freeze-out when the pion density is higher.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.00819 by the authors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

19 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

[9]

Bose- Einstein condensation of pions in ultrarelativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions and the spectra of kaons,

E. E. Kolomeitsev and D. N. Voskresensky, “Bose- Einstein condensation of pions in ultrarelativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions and the spectra of kaons,” Phys. Atom. Nucl. 58, 2082-2087 (1995)

work page 1995
[1]

Strange Goings on in Dense Nucleonic Matter,

D. B. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson, “Strange Goings on in Dense Nucleonic Matter,” Phys. Lett. B 175, 57-63 (1986), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)90331-X A. E. Nelson and D. B. Kaplan, “Strange Condensate Realignment in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions,” Phys. Lett. B 192, 193 (1987), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91166-X

doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)90331-x 1986
[2]

Colloquium : Mea- suring the neutron star equation of state using x-ray timing,

A. L. Watts, N. Andersson, D. Chakrabarty, M. Fe- roci, K. Hebeler, G. Israel, F. K. Lamb, M. C. Miller, S. Morsink and F. ¨Ozel, et al. “Colloquium : Mea- suring the neutron star equation of state using x-ray timing,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, no.2, 021001 (2016), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.88.021001 [arXiv:1602.01081 [astro-ph.HE]]

arXiv 2016
[3]

Progress in Constraining Nuclear Symmetry Energy Us- ing Neutron Star Observables Since GW170817,

B. A. Li, B. J. Cai, W. J. Xie and N. B. Zhang, “Progress in Constraining Nuclear Symmetry Energy Us- ing Neutron Star Observables Since GW170817,” Uni- verse 7, no.6, 182 (2021), doi:10.3390/universe7060182 [arXiv:2105.04629 [nucl-th]]

arXiv 2021
[4]

Neutron stars and the nuclear equation of state,

G. F. Burgio, H. J. Schulze, I. Vidana and J. B. Wei, “Neutron stars and the nuclear equation of state,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 120, 103879 (2021), doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103879 [arXiv:2105.03747 [nucl- th]]

arXiv 2021
[5]

Strangeness in Nu- clei and Neutron Stars,

L. Tolos and L. Fabbietti, “Strangeness in Nu- clei and Neutron Stars,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 112, 103770 (2020), doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2020.103770 [arXiv:2002.09223 [nucl-ex]]

arXiv 2020
[6]

Strangeness Production close to Threshold in Proton-Nucleus and Heavy-Ion Collisions,

C. Hartnack, H. Oeschler, Y. Leifels, E. L. Bratkovskaya and J. Aichelin, “Strangeness Production close to Threshold in Proton-Nucleus and Heavy-Ion Collisions,” Phys. Rept. 510, 119-200 (2012), doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2011.08.004 [arXiv:1106.2083 [nucl-th]]

arXiv 2012
[7]

In-medium effects in strangeness production in heavy-ion collisions at (sub)threshold energies,

T. Song, L. Tolos, J. Wirth, J. Aichelin and E. Bratkovskaya, “In-medium effects in strangeness production in heavy-ion collisions at (sub)threshold energies,” Phys. Rev. C 103, no.4, 044901 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.103.044901 [arXiv:2012.05589 [nucl-th]]

arXiv 2021

Show all 19 references

[8]

Medium modifications of kaons in pion matter,

A. Faessler, C. Fuchs, M. I. Krivoruchenko and B. V. Martemyanov, “Medium modifications of kaons in pion matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 052301 (2004) [arXiv:nucl-th/0212064 [nucl-th]]

2004 arXiv
[10]

Medium effects in high-energy heavy ion collisions,

C. M. Ko and G. Q. Li, “Medium effects in high-energy heavy ion collisions,” J. Phys. G 22, 1673-1725 (1996), [arXiv:nucl-th/9611027 [nucl-th]]

1996 arXiv
[11]

LOW- ENERGY PREDICTIONS OF MODERN CHIRAL LA- GRANGIANS BASED ON QUARK DYNAMICS,

A. A. Belkov, D. Ebert and V. N. Pervushin, “LOW- ENERGY PREDICTIONS OF MODERN CHIRAL LA- GRANGIANS BASED ON QUARK DYNAMICS,” Sov. J. Part. Nucl. 22, 1-30 (1991)

1991
[12]

Chiral symmetry breaking and meson-nucleon sigma commutators: A Review,

E. Reya, “Chiral symmetry breaking and meson-nucleon sigma commutators: A Review,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, 545-580 (1974)

1974
[13]

Kaon polarization in nuclear matter,

E. E. Kolomeitsev, B. Kampfer and D. N. Voskresensky, “Kaon polarization in nuclear matter,” Nucl. Phys. A 588, 889-917 (1995), doi:10.1016/0375-9474(95)00084-E

1995 doi
[14]

Neg- ative kaons in dense baryonic matter,

E. E. Kolomeitsev and D. N. Voskresensky, “Neg- ative kaons in dense baryonic matter,” Phys. Rev. C 68, 015803 (2003), doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.68.015803 [arXiv:nucl-th/0211052 [nucl-th]]

2003 arXiv
[15]

Pion kaon scattering near the threshold in chiral SU(2) perturbation theory,

A. Roessl, “Pion kaon scattering near the threshold in chiral SU(2) perturbation theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 555, 507-539 (1999), doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00336- 3 [arXiv:hep-ph/9904230 [hep-ph]]

1999 arXiv
[16]

pi K scattering in three flavor ChPT,

J. Bijnens, P. Dhonte and P. Talavera, “pi K scattering in three flavor ChPT,” JHEP 05, 036 (2004), doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/05/036 [arXiv:hep- ph/0404150 [hep-ph]]

2004
[17]

Comparison of chemical freeze-out criteria in heavy-ion collisions,

J. Cleymans, H. Oeschler, K. Redlich and S. Wheaton, “Comparison of chemical freeze-out criteria in heavy-ion collisions,” Phys. Rev. C 73, 034905 (2006), doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.73.034905 [arXiv:hep- ph/0511094 [hep-ph]]

2006
[18]

Probing freeze-out condi- tions in heavy ion collisions with moments of charge fluctuations,

F. Karsch and K. Redlich, “Probing freeze-out condi- tions in heavy ion collisions with moments of charge fluctuations,” Phys. Lett. B 695, 136-142 (2011), doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.10.046 [arXiv:1007.2581 [hep-ph]]

2011 arXiv
[19]

http://ckp.nrcki.ru/

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [9]

Bose- Einstein condensation of pions in ultrarelativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions and the spectra of kaons,

E. E. Kolomeitsev and D. N. Voskresensky, “Bose- Einstein condensation of pions in ultrarelativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions and the spectra of kaons,” Phys. Atom. Nucl. 58, 2082-2087 (1995)

work page 1995

[2] [1]

Strange Goings on in Dense Nucleonic Matter,

D. B. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson, “Strange Goings on in Dense Nucleonic Matter,” Phys. Lett. B 175, 57-63 (1986), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)90331-X A. E. Nelson and D. B. Kaplan, “Strange Condensate Realignment in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions,” Phys. Lett. B 192, 193 (1987), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91166-X

doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)90331-x 1986

[3] [2]

Colloquium : Mea- suring the neutron star equation of state using x-ray timing,

A. L. Watts, N. Andersson, D. Chakrabarty, M. Fe- roci, K. Hebeler, G. Israel, F. K. Lamb, M. C. Miller, S. Morsink and F. ¨Ozel, et al. “Colloquium : Mea- suring the neutron star equation of state using x-ray timing,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, no.2, 021001 (2016), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.88.021001 [arXiv:1602.01081 [astro-ph.HE]]

arXiv 2016

[4] [3]

Progress in Constraining Nuclear Symmetry Energy Us- ing Neutron Star Observables Since GW170817,

B. A. Li, B. J. Cai, W. J. Xie and N. B. Zhang, “Progress in Constraining Nuclear Symmetry Energy Us- ing Neutron Star Observables Since GW170817,” Uni- verse 7, no.6, 182 (2021), doi:10.3390/universe7060182 [arXiv:2105.04629 [nucl-th]]

arXiv 2021

[5] [4]

Neutron stars and the nuclear equation of state,

G. F. Burgio, H. J. Schulze, I. Vidana and J. B. Wei, “Neutron stars and the nuclear equation of state,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 120, 103879 (2021), doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103879 [arXiv:2105.03747 [nucl- th]]

arXiv 2021

[6] [5]

Strangeness in Nu- clei and Neutron Stars,

L. Tolos and L. Fabbietti, “Strangeness in Nu- clei and Neutron Stars,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 112, 103770 (2020), doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2020.103770 [arXiv:2002.09223 [nucl-ex]]

arXiv 2020

[7] [6]

Strangeness Production close to Threshold in Proton-Nucleus and Heavy-Ion Collisions,

C. Hartnack, H. Oeschler, Y. Leifels, E. L. Bratkovskaya and J. Aichelin, “Strangeness Production close to Threshold in Proton-Nucleus and Heavy-Ion Collisions,” Phys. Rept. 510, 119-200 (2012), doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2011.08.004 [arXiv:1106.2083 [nucl-th]]

arXiv 2012

[8] [7]

In-medium effects in strangeness production in heavy-ion collisions at (sub)threshold energies,

T. Song, L. Tolos, J. Wirth, J. Aichelin and E. Bratkovskaya, “In-medium effects in strangeness production in heavy-ion collisions at (sub)threshold energies,” Phys. Rev. C 103, no.4, 044901 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.103.044901 [arXiv:2012.05589 [nucl-th]]

arXiv 2021