Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 63 references

Motional refocusing for trap-off Rydberg gates

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A single trap-on interval between two dark windows returns a released atom to its exact motional state, eliminating recapture heating.

desk verdict A correct, genuinely new control result for trap-off Rydberg gates; the harmonic echo is exact and the optimality theorem is real, worth serious peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04812 v1 pith:NOXJWSHS submitted 2026-08-05 quant-ph physics.atom-ph

Yoav Sagi , Ofer Firstenberg , Nir Davidson , Guy Raz This is my paper
classification quant-phphysics.atom-ph
keywords motionalrefocusingRydberggatesopticaltweezersrelease-and-recaptureheatingErmakovscalingtime-optimalcontrolanharmonictrapsneutral-atomquantumcomputing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Rydberg entangling gates in optical-tweezer arrays are usually executed with the trapping light turned off, so every gate includes a release-and-recapture cycle that heats the atomic motion and limits the number of gate layers a circuit can sustain. This paper shows that a single trap-on interval placed between two equal dark windows reverses that heating exactly: for the timing off($T$)-on($t_1$)-off($T$) with $t_1 = \pi/2 - \arctan(T/2)$ in natural units, every motional state of a harmonic mode returns precisely to what it would have been under the unperturbed trap. The whole cycle is therefore the unitary $\exp(-iH_0\tau/\hbar)$, not merely a low-heating approximation. The two-switch sequence is also proved to be the unique globally time-optimal recovery for gate windows up to $\omega T \approx 4.41$, and the construction generalizes to exact multi-mode refocusing and to an anharmonic composite that changes residual heating from $U_0^{-2}$ to $U_0^{-4}$. If the paper is right, the dominant per-gate heating in trap-off neutral-atom quantum computing can be removed with the intensity modulation hardware that already exists.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Ermakov scale factor $b(t)$, the instantaneous width of the wave packet in units of its initial width, which obeys $\ddot b + \omega^2(t) b = \omega_0^2/b^3$. Under the scaling solution every harmonic eigenstate expands self-similarly, so the full motional state is encoded in the pair $(b,\dot b)$; the protocol is a geometric maneuver in that phase plane. Free flight conserves $\epsilon_0 = \frac12 \dot b^2 + 1/(2b^2)$, and the trap hold conserves a different invariant, so the hold moves the system from the expanding to the contracting branch of the same free-flight curve, making the second dark window an exact time reversal of the first. Multi-mode and anharmonic extensions use the same invariant structure: quadrature matrices for common-intensity refocusing, and the complex function $\alpha(t)=b(t)e^{i\phi(t)}$ with $\dot\phi=1/b^2$ to derive the first-order quartic cancellation conditions.

What would settle it

Hold the timing fixed at the analytic point and deliberately impose a small nonzero trap intensity (say 1% of nominal) during one dark window: the measured motional excitation after the cycle should deviate from zero with the quadratic sensitivity the paper predicts for intensity miscalibration, directly showing that exact closure depends on the free-flight assumption. A cleaner version is an experimental scan of the hold time $t_1$ at fixed $T$: zero residual heating should be observed exactly at $t_1 = \pi/2 - \arctan(T/2)$ only when the dark-window intensity is truly zero.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the position–momentum correlation a wave packet acquires during a dark window $T$ of free flight can be completely reversed by one trap-on interval followed by a second dark window of exactly the same duration. Upon release from equilibrium the Ermakov scale factor sits at $(b,\dot b) = (\sqrt{1+T^2}, T/\sqrt{1+T^2})$; a hold at any catch depth $\Lambda$ transports this phase-plane point to its mirror image on the same free-flight invariant curve, and the second dark window coasts back to $(b,\dot b)=(1,0)$. Because the final condition is exact, the scaling solution implies that the full cycle equals $\exp(-iH_0\tau/\hbar)$: populations, coherences, and thermal states are returned unchanged up to ordinary static-trap phase evolution. At nominal depth the hold time is $t_1 = \pi/2 - \arctan(T/2)$, at depth $\Lambda$ it is given by the closed form in Eq. (10), and in both cases the return window is $T$. The paper further proves that for $0<\omega T\leq 4.4107$ this two-switch protocol is the unique globally time-optimal recovery among all measurable intensity programs bounded by the nominal trap intensity.

Load-bearing premise

The exact cancellation requires the trap intensity during the two dark windows to be exactly zero, so the atom undergoes pure free flight; any residual potential or intensity floor during the 'off' intervals leaves a small chirp that the timing cannot fully reverse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Recapture heating per trap-off gate is exactly zero in the harmonic model, so the motional occupation no longer grows geometrically; in the cesium example the radial Doppler error stays pinned near its initial floor instead of crossing 1% around gate 23.
  • The protocol is state independent and requires no knowledge of temperature, no optical phase control, and no extra beams: only programmable intensity switching of the existing trap light.
  • No faster heating-free recovery exists for $\omega T \leq 4.4107$ at nominal depth, making $t_1 = \pi/2 - \arctan(T/2)$ a certified speed limit for this kind of refocusing.
  • One global intensity waveform can exactly refocus two or three nondegenerate harmonic modes at once, removing the axial residual in a cylindrically symmetric tweezer and covering fully anisotropic traps.
  • The composite anharmonic sequence changes the residual heating law from $U_0^{-2}$ to $U_0^{-4}$, extending the benefit to shallow traps and to registers held in a single shared optical lattice.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the cycle is translation invariant and uses a single global waveform, one testable extension is to run the protocol simultaneously on many array sites and check that the harmonic residual stays zero site by site; the paper does not report such a multi-site measurement.
  • The same off-on-off structure could be adapted to any operation that forces a dark interval, such as Rydberg sensing or transport through a region where trapping light must be extinguished, although those settings are not analyzed here.
  • The composite condition (31) is independent of the quartic coefficient, which suggests the anharmonic timing could be calibrated once per trap depth and then reused across a lattice; the paper does not state this robustness claim explicitly.
  • The optimality theorem's failure at long dark times hints that transiently overcompressing the wave packet can beat the echo beyond the certified regime; the predicted crossover near $\omega T \approx 6.9$ is a concrete place to look for faster recapture sequences.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a motional refocusing protocol that eliminates, in the harmonic approximation, the release-and-recapture heating incurred by trap-off Rydberg gates. The central sequence is off(T)-on(t1)-off(T)-on, with t1 = pi/2 - arctan(T/2) at nominal depth and the closed-form generalization Eq. (10) at catch depth Lambda; the authors show that the protocol returns the Ermakov scale factor to (b,bdot)=(1,0), so the full cycle is exactly the unitary exp(-iH0 tau/hbar) of Eq. (12) for a matched harmonic mode. They prove global time-optimality of the two-switch sequence for 0 < omega T <= 4.4107 (Appendix B), construct exact common-intensity refocusing sequences for two and three nondegenerate harmonic modes (Sec. VI), derive a composite sequence that cancels the first-order quartic anharmonic transition generator and changes the residual heating law from U0^-2 to U0^-4 (Sec. VII), and validate the results by split-step wave-packet simulations. The protocol is applied to a representative cesium Rydberg-gate cycle, with a heating and Doppler-error budget given in Sec. V and Table I.

Significance. The central result is a clean, parameter-free theoretical contribution. The echo identity is derived from the Ermakov equation without fitting; the optimality theorem is a genuine control-theoretic statement with an explicit and honest domain of validity; and the multimode and anharmonic extensions are nontrivial and are verified numerically to high precision. The exact-arithmetic Sturm-sequence certificate in Appendix C and the reproducible numerical methods in Appendix F strengthen the paper. If the ideal assumptions of u=0 dark windows, instantaneous switching, and a harmonic trap are met, the protocol exactly suppresses the dominant recapture-heating channel and would materially improve deep-circuit neutral-atom processors. The paper is also transparent about which claims are exact model statements and which are numerical or model-dependent, and the measured robustness coefficients (quadratic sensitivity to miscalibration, ramps, and ellipticity) are appropriate for an experimental-design paper. The residual-dark-intensity question is the main physical caveat, but it does not undermine the exact harmonic theorem, which is stated with its assumptions.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. IV] The control-imperfection analysis quantifies hold intensity miscalibration, hold-time jitter, finite ramps, and trap ellipticity, but it does not quantify a finite extinction floor during the dark windows. Because Sec. III.B explicitly relies on u=0 to conserve the invariant epsilon0 of Eq. (5), adding an estimate of the residual heating versus a small dark-window intensity epsilon, with scaling and a numerical value at the operating point of Table I, would complete the robustness budget.
  2. [Sec. III.C / Appendix A] Equation (12) states that tau = 2 arctan T + tau1 with tau1 given in closed form in Appendix A, but Appendix A derives the explicit tau1 formula only for Lambda = 1. If the arbitrary-catch-depth statement around Eq. (10) is intended to cover Eq. (12) as well, a closed form for tau1(Lambda,T) should be supplied, or the displayed formula should be explicitly restricted to Lambda = 1.
  3. [Eq. (10)] The displayed formula for t1 has a line break before the square root in the denominator, which makes the argument of the arcsine visually ambiguous; adding parentheses or splitting the formula across lines would improve readability.
  4. [Fig. 4] The caption refers to the 'positive branch' of the radial-axial solution family without defining the branch-selection criterion; please state explicitly how the branch is chosen during the continuation.
  5. [Sec. VI.A] The nominal-depth four-duration recovery Y(4.718)X(0.417)Y(2.296)X(0.272) is quoted without stating how it was obtained or whether it is palindromic; a brief sentence on the numerical procedure and the parameter count for this non-palindromic word would aid reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the echo timing, optimality theorem, and multimode/composite closures are derived in-text from stated Ermakov and optimal-control equations, not fitted or imported from self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that off(T)-on(t1)-off(T) with t1 = π/2 − arctan(T/2) returns (b, b˙) = (1, 0)—is derived in Sec. III.B directly from the Ermakov equation (4), the free-flight invariant (5), and the phase-plane geometry; Eq. (11) follows from evaluating the closed orbit in Appendix A. Eq. (12) is then the operator statement of the scaling solution (1), not an assumed identity. The coincidence with the blinking-tweezer condition of Ref. [21] is reported as an independent benchmark, and Ref. [21] involves no overlapping authors, so the citation is not load-bearing. The optimality theorem of Appendix B is proved within the paper via Pontryagin's maximum principle, with the switching-function analysis and the 4.8365 lower bound shown explicitly; the large-T counterexample and certified boundary xcert = 4.4107 are internal consistency checks, not inputs. The multimode and composite sequences solve well-posed closure equations (19), (C3), (31) with no fitting to data, and the numerical exponents (−1.98, −3.96, −3.91) validate the analytic scaling rather than determine it. The only physical caveat is that exact closure requires u = 0 in the dark windows; the paper states this assumption and analyzes related control errors, making residual dark-window intensity a secondary robustness question, not evidence of circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation is largely self-contained within the Ermakov framework. No free parameters are fitted to data: all durations (t1, a, b, c, ta, tb, tc) are fixed by well-posed equations (11), (20), (26), and (33). The axioms listed are standard mathematical tools and explicit modeling choices; the two most consequential are the ideal zero-intensity dark window and the linear-in-u scaling of the quartic anharmonic coefficient.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Ermakov scaling solution for time-dependent quadratic Hamiltonians (Eqs. (1)-(2))
    The mathematical backbone of the protocol (Sec. II), relying on classical results of Lewis and Riesenfeld [22] and subsequent works [23, 24].
  • domain assumption The tweezer is harmonic during the hold and exactly zero during dark windows
    Stated in Secs. II and III.A; exact refocusing holds within this model, and anharmonic corrections are treated later in Secs. IV and VII.
  • domain assumption Instantaneous switching with bounded intensity u ∈ [0, u_max]
    Control model in Sec. III.A; the optimality theorem in Appendix B analyzes bang-bang controls, and finite ramps are separately handled in Sec. IV.
  • standard math Pontryagin maximum principle, absence of singular arcs, and exclusion of abnormal extremals
    Used in Appendix B to prove the global time-optimality theorem; standard optimal-control machinery for the minimum-time problem.
  • domain assumption The Gaussian tweezer's leading anharmonic term is quartic, and its coefficient scales linearly with the instantaneous intensity u(t)
    Used in Sec. VII to derive the composite cancellation conditions (31); valid for an ideal Gaussian beam near its minimum.
  • domain assumption First-order perturbation theory in the quartic coefficient captures the dominant residual heating
    The composite cancels first-order quartic transitions; the numerical scaling U0^-4 in Fig. 5 confirms the dominance of the first-order term.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Motional refocusing for trap-off Rydberg gates." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NOXJWSHS

@misc{pith2026260804812,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Motional refocusing for trap-off Rydberg gates},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NOXJWSHS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04812}
}
abstract

Rydberg entangling gates in optical-tweezer arrays are commonly executed with the trapping light switched off, so every gate contains a release--and--recapture cycle that heats the atomic motion and can ultimately limit circuit depth. We develop a motional refocusing protocol that exactly removes this heating in the harmonic approximation using only programmable intensity switching of the trapping light. The protocol closes the release--and--recapture cycle for every matched harmonic mode, returning arbitrary motional populations and coherences exactly up to ordinary evolution under the static trap. We derive the recovery sequence in closed form for arbitrary catch depth and prove that, within the experimentally relevant regime, it is the unique globally time-optimal solution under bounded trap intensity. The harmonic theory is then extended in two directions. First, we construct exact common-intensity recovery sequences that simultaneously refocus several nondegenerate harmonic modes, including radial--axial and fully anisotropic three-dimensional traps. Second, we derive a composite sequence that suppresses the leading anharmonic correction of weakly anharmonic traps by canceling all first-order motional transitions induced by the quartic anharmonicity, changing the residual heating law from $U_0^{-2}$ to $U_0^{-4}$. Wave-packet simulations in realistic Gaussian tweezers validate the analytic theory and quantify the residual effects of anharmonicity, finite switching ramps, trap ellipticity, and control errors. Applied to representative cesium Rydberg gates, the protocol suppresses the dominant recapture heating to the anharmonic floor and prevents the associated motional Doppler contribution from increasing with circuit depth. The resulting framework provides a practical route toward heating-free trap-off neutral-atom gates using only trap-intensity modulation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04812 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: continues this Λ = 2 branch over 0.2 ≤ x ≤ 1 and 2 ≤ η ≤ 6. Positive solutions occur throughout the sampled 41×41 grid, with 1.148 ≤ ωrt (rz) rec ≤ 3.232. More￾over, σmin(J ) ≥ 8.6 × 10−2 everywhere on the grid, so every sampled point has a nonsingular local exact fami…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) shows the resulting recapture curves. Even at zero temperature the signal decays, with a rate set by the number of bound states, and excited eigenstates display strikingly non-classical behavior: multiple decay time scales for n = 2 and clear revivals for n = 5, ca…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [21]

    Robicheaux, T

    F. Robicheaux, T. M. Graham, and M. Saffman, Photon- recoil and laser-focusing limits to Rydberg gate fidelity, Phys. Rev. A103, 022424 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [1]

    The free and trap-on propagators defined in Eqs

    Palindromic reduction and local existence Let Σ = diag(1,−1), which implements time rever- sal in the normalized quadrature space, Σ( ˆQi, ˆPi)T = ( ˆQi,− ˆPi)T. The free and trap-on propagators defined in Eqs. (15)–(17) satisfy ΣFi(s)Σ =F −1 i (s),ΣR i,Λ(s)Σ =R −1 i,Λ(s).(C1) For a full-cycle palindromic intensity waveform, the or- dered productM i there...

    work page

  3. [2]

    The scalar closure equation is linear in the intermediate dark durationb

    Analytic reduction and continuation For the two-mode palindrome (20), setz i = tan(Ληia). The scalar closure equation is linear in the intermediate dark durationb. Defining Ai(a) = Λ2(1 +η 2 i x2)−1 zi + Ληix(z2 i −1),(C13) Di(a) = Λ2(1 +η 2 i x2)z2 i −2Λη ixzi + 1,(C14) we obtain b=B i(a)≡ 2Ai(a) ΛηiDi(a) .(C15) For the cylindrically symmetric radial–axi...

    work page

  4. [3]

    temperature

    Bounds and exact optimality within the palindromic family Let hΛ(y) = 1 Λ atan2 2Λy,Λ 2(1 +y 2)−1 ,(C16) JΛ(y) =y+h Λ(y) (C17) be the certified one-mode minimum recovery time in that mode’s natural units. A common waveform of physi- cal durationt rec is admissible for every individual mode. Therefore ωrtrec ≥max i JΛ(ηix) ηi ,(C18) provided everyη ixlies ...

    work page

  5. [4]

    A. M. Kaufman and K.-K. Ni, Quantum science with optical tweezer arrays of ultracold atoms and molecules, Nat. Phys.17, 1324 (2021)

    2021

  6. [5]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms, Nat. Phys.16, 132 (2020)

    2020

  7. [6]

    Saffman, T

    M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Quantum information with Rydberg atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 2313 (2010)

    2010

  8. [7]

    Saffman, Quantum computing with atomic qubits and Rydberg interactions: progress and challenges, J

    M. Saffman, Quantum computing with atomic qubits and Rydberg interactions: progress and challenges, J. Phys. B49, 202001 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 63 references
  1. [8]

    Jaksch, J

    D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, S. L. Rolston, R. Cˆ ot´ e, and M. D. Lukin, Fast quantum gates for neutral atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 2208 (2000)

    2000

  2. [9]

    Levine, A

    H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, A. Omran, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, H. Bernien, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, H. Pichler, and M. D. Lukin, Parallel implementation of high-fidelity multiqubit gates with neutral atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 170503 (2019)

    2019

  3. [10]

    S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, M. Kalinowski, S. Ebadi, T. Manovitz, H. Zhou, S. H. Li, A. A. Geim, T. T. Wang, N. Maskara, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, High-fidelity parallel entan- gling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature 622...

    2023

  4. [11]

    Bluvstein, S

    D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kalinowski, D. Hangleiter,et al., Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature626, 58 (2024)

    2024

  5. [12]

    I. S. Madjarov, J. P. Covey, A. L. Shaw, J. Choi, A. Kale, A. Cooper, H. Pichler, V. Schkolnik, J. R. Williams, and M. Endres, High-fidelity entanglement and detection of alkaline-earth Rydberg atoms, Nat. Phys.16, 857 (2020)

    2020

  6. [13]

    A. Cao, W. J. Eckner, T. Lukin Yelin, A. W. Young, S. Jandura, L. Yan, K. Kim, G. Pupillo, J. Ye, N. D. Oppong, and A. M. Kaufman, Multi-qubit gates and Schr¨ odinger-cat states in an optical clock, Nature634, 315 (2024)

    2024

  7. [14]

    de L´ es´ eleuc, D

    S. de L´ es´ eleuc, D. Barredo, V. Lienhard, A. Browaeys, and T. Lahaye, Analysis of imperfections in the coher- ent optical excitation of single atoms to Rydberg states, Phys. Rev. A97, 053803 (2018)

    2018

  8. [15]

    R. J. P. T. de Keijzer, O. Tse, and S. J. J. M. F. Kokkel- mans, Recapture probability for antitrapped Rydberg states in optical tweezers, Phys. Rev. A108, 023122 (2023)

    2023

  9. [16]

    Zhang, F

    S. Zhang, F. Robicheaux, and M. Saffman, Magic- wavelength optical traps for Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. A84, 043408 (2011)

    2011

  10. [17]

    Barredo, V

    D. Barredo, V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, T. Boulier, A. Browaeys, and T. Lahaye, Three- dimensional trapping of individual Rydberg atoms in ponderomotive bottle beam traps, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 023201 (2020)

    2020

  11. [18]

    J. T. Wilson, S. Saskin, Y. Meng, S. Ma, R. Dilip, A. P. Burgers, and J. D. Thompson, Trapping alkaline earth Rydberg atoms in optical tweezer arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 033201 (2022)

    2022

  12. [19]

    A. M. Kaufman, B. J. Lester, and C. A. Regal, Cooling a single atom in an optical tweezer to its quantum ground state, Phys. Rev. X2, 041014 (2012)

    2012

  13. [20]

    J. D. Thompson, T. G. Tiecke, A. S. Zibrov, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Coherence and Raman sideband cooling of a single atom in an optical tweezer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 133001 (2013)

    2013

  14. [22]

    Pagano, S

    A. Pagano, S. Weber, D. Jaschke, T. Pfau, F. Meinert, S. Montangero, and H. P. B¨ uchler, Error budgeting for a controlled-phase gate with strontium-88 Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033019 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    Jandura and G

    S. Jandura and G. Pupillo, Time-optimal two- and three- qubit gates for Rydberg atoms, Quantum6, 712 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    K. Kim, K. Kim, and J. Ahn, Blinking optical tweez- ers for atom rearrangements, Adv. Quantum Technol.9, e00531 (2026)

    2026

  17. [25]

    H. R. Lewis and W. B. Riesenfeld, An exact quantum theory of the time-dependent harmonic oscillator and of a charged particle in a time-dependent electromagnetic field, J. Math. Phys.10, 1458 (1969)

    1969

  18. [26]

    H. R. Lewis and P. G. L. Leach, A direct approach to find- ing exact invariants for one-dimensional time-dependent classical Hamiltonians, J. Math. Phys.23, 2371 (1982)

    1982

  19. [27]

    A. K. Dhara and S. V. Lawande, Feynman propagator for time-dependent Lagrangians possessing an invariant quadratic in momentum, J. Phys. A17, 2423 (1984)

    1984

  20. [28]

    Kagan, E

    Y. Kagan, E. L. Surkov, and G. V. Shlyapnikov, Evolu- tion of a Bose gas in anisotropic time-dependent traps, Phys. Rev. A54, R1753 (1996)

    1996

  21. [29]

    Castin and R

    Y. Castin and R. Dum, Bose-Einstein condensates in time dependent traps, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 5315 (1996)

    1996

  22. [30]

    S. Chu, J. E. Bjorkholm, A. Ashkin, J. P. Gordon, and L. W. Hollberg, Proposal for optically cooling atoms to temperatures of the order of 10 −6 K, Opt. Lett.11, 73 (1986)

    1986

  23. [31]

    Ammann and N

    H. Ammann and N. Christensen, Delta kick cooling: A new method for cooling atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 2088 (1997)

    1997

  24. [32]

    Morinaga, I

    M. Morinaga, I. Bouchoule, J.-C. Karam, and C. Sa- lomon, Manipulation of motional quantum states of neu- tral atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 4037 (1999)

    1999

  25. [33]

    Kovachy, J

    T. Kovachy, J. M. Hogan, A. Sugarbaker, S. M. Dicker- son, C. A. Donnelly, C. Overstreet, and M. A. Kasevich, Matter wave lensing to picokelvin temperatures, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 143004 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    Dupays, D

    L. Dupays, D. C. Spierings, A. M. Steinberg, and A. del Campo, Delta-kick cooling, time-optimal control of scale- invariant dynamics, and shortcuts to adiabaticity as- sisted by kicks, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 033261 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    X. Chen, A. Ruschhaupt, S. Schmidt, A. del Campo, D. Gu´ ery-Odelin, and J. G. Muga, Fast optimal friction- less atom cooling in harmonic traps: Shortcut to adia- baticity, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 063002 (2010)

    2010

  28. [36]

    Schaff, X.-L

    J.-F. Schaff, X.-L. Song, P. Vignolo, and G. Labeyrie, Fast optimal transition between two equilibrium states, Phys. Rev. A82, 033430 (2010)

    2010

  29. [37]

    Schaff, X.-L

    J.-F. Schaff, X.-L. Song, P. Capuzzi, P. Vignolo, and G. Labeyrie, Shortcut to adiabaticity for an interacting Bose-Einstein condensate, EPL93, 23001 (2011). 20

    2011

  30. [38]

    Stefanatos, J

    D. Stefanatos, J. Ruths, and J.-S. Li, Frictionless atom cooling in harmonic traps: A time-optimal approach, Phys. Rev. A82, 063422 (2010)

    2010

  31. [39]

    Gu´ ery-Odelin, A

    D. Gu´ ery-Odelin, A. Ruschhaupt, A. Kiely, E. Tor- rontegui, S. Mart ´ ınez-Garaot, and J. G. Muga, Short- cuts to adiabaticity: Concepts, methods, and applica- tions, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 045001 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    Tuchendler, A

    C. Tuchendler, A. M. Lance, A. Browaeys, Y. R. P. Sor- tais, and P. Grangier, Energy distribution and cooling of a single atom in an optical tweezer, Phys. Rev. A78, 033425 (2008)

    2008

  33. [41]

    H¨ olzl, A

    C. H¨ olzl, A. G¨ otzelmann, M. Wirth, M. S. Safronova, S. Weber, and F. Meinert, Motional ground-state cooling of single atoms in state-dependent optical tweezers, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033093 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Biagioni, B

    G. Biagioni, B. Hofer, N. Bonvalet, D. Bloch, A. Browaeys, and I. Ferrier-Barbut, Narrowline cooling of dysprosium atoms in an optical tweezer array, Phys. Rev. A112, 013316 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    Jandura, J

    S. Jandura, J. D. Thompson, and G. Pupillo, Optimizing rydberg gates for logical-qubit performance, PRX Quan- tum4, 020336 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    R. Li, J. Qian, and W. Zhang, Erasing doppler dephasing error in rydberg quantum gates, New J. Phys.27, 054502 (2025)

    2025

  37. [45]

    Palmero, S

    M. Palmero, S. Mart ´ ınez-Garaot, J. Alonso, J. P. Home, and J. G. Muga, Fast expansions and compressions of trapped-ion chains, Phys. Rev. A91, 053411 (2015)

    2015

  38. [46]

    Tobalina, E

    A. Tobalina, E. Torrontegui, I. Lizuain, M. Palmero, and J. G. Muga, Invariant-based inverse engineering of time- dependent, coupled harmonic oscillators, Phys. Rev. A 102, 063112 (2020)

    2020

  39. [47]

    Marocco, D

    G. Marocco, D. C. Moore, and D. Carney, Three- dimensional squeezing of optically levitated nanospheres, Phys. Rev. A114, 013504 (2026)

    2026

  40. [48]

    Stefanatos, H

    D. Stefanatos, H. Schaettler, and J.-S. Li, Minimum- time frictionless atom cooling in harmonic traps, SIAM J. Control Optim.49, 2440 (2011)

    2011

  41. [49]

    M¨ untingaet al., Interferometry with Bose-Einstein condensates in microgravity, Phys

    H. M¨ untingaet al., Interferometry with Bose-Einstein condensates in microgravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 093602 (2013)

    2013

  42. [50]

    Deppneret al., Collective-mode enhanced matter- wave optics, Phys

    C. Deppneret al., Collective-mode enhanced matter- wave optics, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 100401 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    Fan and H

    H.-Y. Fan and H. R. Zaidi, Squeezing and frequency jump of a harmonic oscillator, Phys. Rev. A37, 2985 (1988)

    1988

  44. [52]

    T. Kiss, P. Adam, and J. Janszky, Time-evolution of a harmonic oscillator: jumps between two frequencies, Phys. Lett. A192, 311 (1994)

    1994

  45. [53]

    M. Xin, W. S. Leong, Z. Chen, Y. Wang, and S.-Y. Lan, Rapid quantum squeezing by jumping the harmonic os- cillator frequency, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 183602 (2021)

    2021

  46. [54]

    Lienhard, R

    V. Lienhard, R. Martin, Y. T. Chew, T. Tomita, K. Ohmori, and S. de L´ es´ eleuc, Generation of motional squeezed states for neutral atoms in optical tweezers, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 253404 (2025)

    2025

  47. [55]

    Hwang, A

    H. Hwang, A. Byun, J. Park, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, and J. Ahn, Optical tweezers throw and catch single atoms, Optica 10, 401 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    S. J. Evered, M. Xu, S. H. Li, A. A. Geim, J. P. Bonilla Ataides, M. Kalinowski, D. Bluvstein, N. Maskara, C. Kokail, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, High-fidelity entangling gates and nonlocal cir- cuits with neutral atoms (2026), arXiv:2604.25987

    2026 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Linet al., Sustaining high-fidelity quantum logic in neutral-atom circuits via mid-circuit operations (2026), arXiv:2603.01612

    R. Linet al., Sustaining high-fidelity quantum logic in neutral-atom circuits via mid-circuit operations (2026), arXiv:2603.01612

    2026

  50. [58]

    Glatthard, J

    J. Glatthard, J. Rubio, R. Sawant, T. Hewitt, G. Baron- tini, and L. A. Correa, Optimal cold atom thermome- try using adaptive Bayesian strategies, PRX Quantum 3, 040330 (2022)

    2022

  51. [59]

    G. K. Brennen, C. M. Caves, P. S. Jessen, and I. H. Deutsch, Quantum logic gates in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 1060 (1999)

    1999

  52. [60]

    Bloch, Ultracold quantum gases in optical lattices, Nat

    I. Bloch, Ultracold quantum gases in optical lattices, Nat. Phys.1, 23 (2005)

    2005

  53. [61]

    Magro, W

    V. Magro, W. Adamczyk, and S. de L´ es´ eleuc, Protocols of coherent motion control for an interaction-driven rydberg gate, arXiv:2607.23090 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  54. [62]

    J.-F. Riou, Y. Le Coq, F. Impens, W. Guerin, C. J. Bord´ e, A. Aspect, and P. Bouyer, Theoretical tools for atom-laser-beam propagation, Phys. Rev. A77, 033630 (2008)

    2008

  55. [63]

    Boscain, M

    U. Boscain, M. Sigalotti, and D. Sugny, Introduction to the pontryagin maximum principle for quantum optimal control, PRX Quantum2, 030203 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.