Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 75 references

Primordial Gravitational Waves in Quadratic Gravity

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Quadratic gravity predicts that primordial gravitational waves are suppressed by a factor controlled by the spin-two ghost mass, restoring the slow-roll consistency relation.

desk verdict A clean, testable claim in quadratic gravity that deserves referee time, but the ghost quantization is the whole ballgame and isn't settled in the abstract. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03543 v3 pith:NQKUMKEA submitted 2025-02-05 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-ph

Jisuke Kubo , Jeffrey Kuntz This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.COhep-ph MSC 83F0583C3583D05
keywords quadraticgravityprimordialgravitationalwavestensorpowerspectrumspin-twoghostinflationslow-rollconsistencyconditionauxiliaryfieldquasi-deSitterspacetime
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quadratic gravity, a fourth-order theory of gravity that is renormalizable and can drive inflation, is brought to second-order form with an auxiliary tensor field so that the primordial tensor perturbations can be quantized canonically. On a Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker background in quasi-de Sitter spacetime, the paper computes the tensor power spectrum and finds that both the amplitude $A_t$ and the spectral index $n_t$ are multiplied by the same suppression factor $(1+2H_*^2/m_{\rm gh}^2)^{-1}$, where $H_*$ is the Hubble rate at horizon exit and $m_{\rm gh}$ is the spin-two ghost mass. Because the same factor appears in both quantities, the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$ and the spectral index satisfy $r=-8n_t$ at lowest nontrivial order, the same consistency condition as in single-field slow-roll inflation. A sympathetic reader should care because this gives quadratic gravity a concrete, potentially observable gravitational-wave signature whose size is tied to the ghost mass, and it means a higher-derivative completion of gravity can still pass the standard consistency test.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the auxiliary tensor field that recasts fourth-order quadratic gravity as a second-order theory, introducing a massive spin-two ghost mode alongside the massless graviton; the spin-two ghost is the tensor mode with negative kinetic energy that fourth-order gravity inevitably contains. The other central quantity is the ghost mass $m_{\rm gh}$. The power spectrum computation proceeds by canonical quantization of the tensor perturbations around an FLRW background in quasi-de Sitter spacetime, and the ratio $H_*^2/m_{\rm gh}^2$ is the dimensionless combination that controls the result. The key identity is the uniform suppression factor $(1+2H_*^2/m_{\rm gh}^2)^{-1}$ applied to both $A_t$ and $n_t$, which is what restores $r=-8n_t$.

What would settle it

Recompute the tensor power spectrum using a different ghost vacuum or a unitarized ghost propagator: if the resulting amplitude and spectral index are not both multiplied by exactly $(1+2H_*^2/m_{\rm gh}^2)^{-1}$, the central claim fails. Observationally, a measured primordial tensor background whose amplitude and tilt cannot be fit by a single value of $m_{\rm gh}/H_*$ would falsify the common-factor prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in quadratic gravity the tensor power spectrum around a quasi-de Sitter Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker background is not the standard single-field result but that result multiplied by $(1+2H_*^2/m_{\rm gh}^2)^{-1}$. The same multiplicative factor applies to the amplitude $A_t$ and to the spectral index $n_t$, so the prediction remains consistent with $r=-8n_t$ to lowest nontrivial order in slow roll. In the limit of a very heavy ghost, $m_{\rm gh}\gg H_*$, the factor approaches one and ordinary single-field-like predictions are recovered; when the ghost mass is comparable to or smaller than the Hubble rate at horizon exit, the primordial gravitational-wave signal is suppressed. The paper presents this as a concrete consequence of the auxiliary-tensor second-order formulation and discusses the spin-two ghost problem as an open issue that bears directly on the calculation.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes that the spin-two ghost mode, which has negative kinetic energy, can be quantized in a way that yields a real, positive tensor power spectrum, and that the second-order auxiliary-tensor formulation is dynamically equivalent to the original fourth-order action.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If quadratic gravity is the correct theory of inflation, the primordial gravitational-wave background is weaker than single-field inflation predicts whenever $m_{\rm gh}\lesssim H_*$, with the suppression controlled by the dimensionless ratio $H_*^2/m_{\rm gh}^2$.
  • Because $A_t$ and $n_t$ share the same suppression factor, future joint measurements of the tensor amplitude and tilt cannot use the relation $r=-8n_t$ alone to distinguish quadratic gravity from single-field inflation; only the absolute amplitude can do that.
  • In the heavy-ghost limit $m_{\rm gh}\gg H_*$, the tensor spectrum of quadratic gravity becomes observationally indistinguishable from standard slow-roll inflation, so any visible suppression is a direct probe of a relatively light ghost.
  • A measured suppression in the tensor spectrum would constrain the ghost mass relative to the inflationary Hubble scale, connecting the ghost problem of quadratic gravity to observational cosmology.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same auxiliary-tensor mechanism that suppresses the tensor spectrum may also affect scalar perturbations, and a scalar-sector calculation would show whether the consistency relation survives beyond the tensor sector; the paper does not compute that.
  • Because the suppression factor is the only place the ghost mass enters the tensor spectrum, the prediction is sensitive to the chosen quantization of the ghost, so the result is best read as a signature of a specific vacuum prescription rather than a robust theorem of quadratic gravity.
  • A future measurement of the tensor amplitude and tilt precise enough to test the common factor would effectively measure $m_{\rm gh}/H_*$; if the value from $A_t$ disagrees with the value from $n_t$, the common-factor structure is incomplete.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims that in quadratic gravity around a quasi-de Sitter background, after introducing an auxiliary tensor field and performing canonical quantization of the perturbations, the tensor power spectrum amplitude A_t and spectral index n_t both acquire the factor (1 + 2H_*^2/m_gh^2)^{-1}, where H_* is the Hubble rate at horizon exit and m_gh is the spin-two ghost mass. The abstract further claims that this restored the single-field slow-roll consistency relation r = -8n_t at lowest nontrivial order, and it promises a discussion of the well-known ghost problem.

Significance. If the derivation is correct, this is a concrete and falsifiable prediction: quadratic gravity would suppress primordial gravitational waves by an amount controlled by the spin-two ghost mass, while still satisfying the standard tensor consistency relation. The reasoning from the stated suppression factor to the restored relation r = -8n_t is internally coherent once one accounts for the k-dependence of H_* at horizon exit. The result is presented as a derivation, not a fit, so there is no circularity; however, m_gh is a free parameter and the prediction is conditional on a ghost quantization scheme that yields a real, positive tensor power spectrum.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text] The supplied text contains only the abstract; the promised derivation of the suppression factor is not present. Because the factor (1 + 2H_*^2/m_gh^2)^{-1} is the central result of the paper, the claim cannot be verified from the material provided. This would be acceptable only if the full calculation is included in the paper under review.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states that the suppression arises after canonical quantization of the perturbations, but it does not specify the quantization prescription for the spin-two ghost. The two-point function of the metric perturbation is sensitive to the norm and vacuum assignment of the ghost sector; a different prescription would alter or invalidate the suppression factor. A derivation must show that the chosen quantization yields a real, positive tensor power spectrum.
  3. [Abstract] The paper moves to a second-order form with an auxiliary tensor field and uses this for quantization. Classical dynamical equivalence does not automatically imply quantum equivalence of the metric two-point function. The text must demonstrate that the auxiliary-field reformulation reproduces the full fourth-order theory's graviton two-point function, including the massive ghost pole, before the power-spectrum result can be accepted.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The notation H_* appears in bold in the abstract; please define it as the Hubble parameter at horizon exit and use consistent math formatting.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract says the ghost problem is 'discussed' in the paper, but no such discussion appears in the supplied material; if this is a complete submission, that promised section is missing.
  3. [Abstract] The phrase 'restores the slow-roll consistency condition' could be read as implying the condition was absent in general relativity; the intended meaning is that the modified amplitude and tilt still satisfy the standard relation, and this should be stated explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the suppression factor is derived from the theory, not fitted or defined into existence.

full rationale

The abstract reports a first-principles calculation: the quadratic-gravity action is brought into second-order form with an auxiliary tensor field, the tensor perturbations are canonically quantized on a quasi-de Sitter background, and the power spectrum is computed. The stated suppression factor (1 + 2H^2_*/m_gh^2)^{-1} is a consequence of the theory's structure, with the ghost mass entering as a parameter of the action, not as a number fitted to the predicted quantity. No data are used to set the amplitude or spectral index, and the slow-roll consistency relation r = -8n_t is derived as an output rather than imposed as an input. The remaining concerns—whether the ghost sector can be consistently quantized and whether the auxiliary-tensor reformulation preserves the graviton two-point function—are substantive correctness or assumption issues, but they are not circularity: the derivation does not assume the result it claims to derive. No self-citations, fitted inputs, or definitional equivalences are evident from the available text.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central prediction depends on one free theory parameter, m_gh, which the paper does not determine; all observable consequences scale with m_gh relative to the background Hubble rate H_*. The computation rests on standard assumptions (the quadratic gravity action, slow-roll quasi-de Sitter background, canonical quantization) and on one unresolved ad hoc assumption: that the ghost sector can be quantized to give a physical spectrum. H_* is a standard inflationary background input, not a fitted constant. The ledger is necessarily incomplete because the full derivation was not available for inspection.

free parameters (1)
  • m_gh (spin-two ghost mass)
    Sets the suppression scale in the predicted factor (1 + 2H_*^2/m_gh^2)^{-1}; its value is not fixed by the paper, so the observable prediction is conditional on this free theory parameter. A negative m_gh^2 would make the factor non-positive, so the paper implicitly assumes m_gh^2 > 0.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The quadratic gravity action with R^2 and R_{\mu\nu}R^{\mu\nu} terms is the theory under study, and it is classically equivalent to the second-order auxiliary tensor field formulation.
    The abstract states the second-order rewriting but takes the theory's validity and the classical equivalence as given; the entire computation builds on this starting point.
  • domain assumption Tensor perturbations around a quasi-de Sitter FLRW background can be canonically quantized with a standard (Bunch-Davies-like) vacuum for the healthy tensor mode.
    The power spectrum result presumes the usual quantization and vacuum selection; the abstract does not describe the vacuum prescription.
  • ad hoc to paper The spin-two ghost mode can be handled in a way that leaves a meaningful, positive power spectrum.
    The abstract only says the ghost problem is 'discussed.' The physical status of the suppression factor depends on this unresolved point.
  • domain assumption The slow-roll approximation holds, and the consistency relation is evaluated at lowest nontrivial order in slow-roll.
    The abstract states the result holds 'in the lowest nontrivial order in the slow-roll approximation'; higher-order corrections are not addressed.
invented entities (1)
  • Auxiliary tensor field (the spin-two ghost field)
    purpose: Rewrites the fourth-order quadratic gravity action as a second-order theory so the perturbations can be canonically quantized.
    A standard field-redefinition device in higher-derivative gravity rather than a new physical particle; no independent falsifiable handle is provided because its mass m_gh is left as a free parameter.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Primordial Gravitational Waves in Quadratic Gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NQKUMKEA

@misc{pith2026250203543,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Primordial Gravitational Waves in Quadratic Gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NQKUMKEA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03543}
}
abstract

Quadratic gravity is a fourth-order (in derivatives) theory that can serve as an attractive upgrade to the standard description of gravity provided by General Relativity, thanks to its renormalizability and its built-in description of primordial inflation. We bring quadratic gravity into a second-order form by introducing an auxiliary tensor field and we consider the primordial tensor fluctuations (gravitational waves) in the theory around a Friedmann-Lema\^itre-Robertson-Walker background. After a canonical quantization of the perturbations, we calculate the tensor power spectrum in quasi de Sitter spacetime. We find that the spectral index $n_t$ and the amplitude $A_t$ of the tensor power spectrum are both suppressed by the factor $(1 + 2{\bf H}^2_*/m_\text{gh}^2)^{-1}$, where ${\bf H}_*$ is the Hubble rate at horizon exit and $m_\text{gh}$ is the mass of the spin-two ghost. This restores the slow-roll consistency condition familiar from single-field inflation models, where the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$ is equal to $-8n_t$ in the lowest nontrivial order in the slow-roll approximation. We also discuss the well-known issue of the ghost problem in fourth-order theories and how it pertains to the results at hand.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov, `` Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe ,'' JETP Lett. 33 (1981) 532--535

    work page 1981

  2. [2]

    S. W. Hawking, `` The Development of Irregularities in a Single Bubble Inflationary Universe ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(82)90373-2 Phys. Lett. B 115 (1982) 295

    doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90373-2 1982

  3. [3]

    A. A. Starobinsky, `` Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(82)90541-X Phys. Lett. B 117 (1982) 175--178

    doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90541-x 1982

  4. [4]

    A. H. Guth and S. Y. Pi, `` Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1110 Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 1110--1113

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.49.1110 1982

  5. [5]

    J. M. Bardeen, P. J. Steinhardt, and M. S. Turner, `` Spontaneous Creation of Almost Scale - Free Density Perturbations in an Inflationary Universe ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.28.679 Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983) 679

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.28.679 1983

  6. [6]

    Kodama and M

    H. Kodama and M. Sasaki, `` Cosmological Perturbation Theory ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTPS.78.1 Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 78 (1984) 1--166

    doi:10.1143/ptps.78.1 1984

  7. [7]

    E. J. Copeland, E. W. Kolb, A. R. Liddle, and J. E. Lidsey, `` Reconstructing the inflation potential, in principle and in practice ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.48.2529 Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 2529--2547 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9303288 arXiv:hep-ph/9303288

    arXiv 1993

  8. [8]

    Bartolo, E

    N. Bartolo, E. Komatsu, S. Matarrese, and A. Riotto, `` Non-Gaussianity from inflation: Theory and observations ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.022 Phys. Rept. 402 (2004) 103--266 , http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0406398 arXiv:astro-ph/0406398

    arXiv 2004

Show all 75 references
  1. [9]

    Weinberg, Cosmology

    S. Weinberg, Cosmology . Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008

    2008

  2. [10]

    D. Baumann, http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789814327183_0010 `` Inflation ,'' in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics : Physics of the Large and the Small , pp. 523--686. 2011. http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.5424 arXiv:0907.5424 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  3. [11]

    D. H. Lyth, `` A Bound on Inflationary Energy Density From the Isotropy of the Microwave Background ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(84)91391-1 Phys. Lett. B 147 (1984) 403 . [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 150, 465 (1985)]

    1984 doi

  4. [12]

    D. H. Lyth, `` Large Scale Energy Density Perturbations and Inflation ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.31.1792 Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 1792--1798

    1985 doi

  5. [13]

    V. F. Mukhanov, `` Gravitational Instability of the Universe Filled with a Scalar Field ,'' JETP Lett. 41 (1985) 493--496

    1985

  6. [14]

    Sasaki, `` Large Scale Quantum Fluctuations in the Inflationary Universe ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTP.76.1036 Prog

    M. Sasaki, `` Large Scale Quantum Fluctuations in the Inflationary Universe ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTP.76.1036 Prog. Theor. Phys. 76 (1986) 1036

    1986 doi

  7. [15]

    E. D. Stewart and D. H. Lyth, `` A More accurate analytic calculation of the spectrum of cosmological perturbations produced during inflation ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(93)90379-V Phys. Lett. B 302 (1993) 171--175 , http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9302019 arXiv:gr-qc/9302019

    1993 arXiv

  8. [16]

    A. A. Starobinsky, `` Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe ,'' JETP Lett. 30 (1979) 682--685

    1979

  9. [17]

    V. A. Rubakov, M. V. Sazhin, and A. V. Veryaskin, `` Graviton Creation in the Inflationary Universe and the Grand Unification Scale ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(82)90641-4 Phys. Lett. B 115 (1982) 189--192

    1982 doi

  10. [18]

    Fabbri and M

    R. Fabbri and M. d. Pollock, `` The Effect of Primordially Produced Gravitons upon the Anisotropy of the Cosmological Microwave Background Radiation ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(83)91322-9 Phys. Lett. B 125 (1983) 445--448

    1983 doi

  11. [19]

    L. F. Abbott and M. B. Wise, `` Constraints on Generalized Inflationary Cosmologies ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(84)90329-8 Nucl. Phys. B 244 (1984) 541--548

    1984 doi

  12. [20]

    BICEP, Keck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade et al. , `` Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.151301 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 no. 15, (2021)...

    2021

  13. [21]

    A. A. Starobinsky, `` A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-X Phys. Lett. B91 (1980) 99--102

    1980 doi

  14. [22]

    Akrami et al

    Planck Collaboration, Y. Akrami et al. , `` Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833887 Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A10 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1807.06211 arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Allys et al

    LiteBIRD Collaboration, E. Allys et al. , `` Probing Cosmic Inflation with the LiteBIRD Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Survey ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptac150 PTEP 2023 no. 4, (2023) 042F01 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.02773 arXiv:2202.02773 [astro-ph.IM]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Abazajian et al

    CMB-S4 Collaboration, K. Abazajian et al. , `` CMB-S4: Forecasting Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac1596 Astrophys. J. 926 no. 1, (2022) 54 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.12619 arXiv:2008.12619 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Hanany et al

    NASA PICO Collaboration, S. Hanany et al. , `` PICO: Probe of Inflation and Cosmic Origins ,'' http://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10541 arXiv:1902.10541 [astro-ph.IM]

    1902 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Ach\'ucarro et al

    A. Ach\'ucarro et al. , `` Inflation: Theory and Observations ,'' http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.08128 arXiv:2203.08128 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    K. S. Stelle, `` Renormalization of Higher Derivative Quantum Gravity ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.16.953 Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 953--969

    1977 doi

  20. [28]

    Clunan and M

    T. Clunan and M. Sasaki, `` Tensor ghosts in the inflationary cosmology ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/27/16/165014 Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 165014 , http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.3868 arXiv:0907.3868 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Deruelle, M

    N. Deruelle, M. Sasaki, Y. Sendouda, and A. Youssef, `` Inflation with a Weyl term, or ghosts at work ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2011/03/040 JCAP 03 (2011) 040 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.5202 arXiv:1012.5202 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Deruelle, M

    N. Deruelle, M. Sasaki, Y. Sendouda, and A. Youssef, `` Lorentz-violating vs ghost gravitons: the example of Weyl gravity ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2012)009 JHEP 09 (2012) 009 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.3131 arXiv:1202.3131 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Y. S. Myung and T. Moon, `` Primordial massive gravitational waves from Einstein-Chern-Simons-Weyl gravity ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/08/061 JCAP 08 (2014) 061 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4367 arXiv:1406.4367 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Y. S. Myung and T. Moon, `` Scale-invariant tensor spectrum from conformal gravity ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217732315501722 Mod. Phys. Lett. A 30 no. 32, (2015) 1550172 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.01749 arXiv:1501.01749 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Baumann, H

    D. Baumann, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel, `` High-Scale Inflation and the Tensor Tilt ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2016)101 JHEP 01 (2016) 101 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.07250 arXiv:1507.07250 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  26. [34]

    M. M. Ivanov and A. A. Tokareva, `` Cosmology with a light ghost ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/12/018 JCAP 12 (2016) 018 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1610.05330 arXiv:1610.05330 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Salvio, `` Inflationary perturbations in no-scale theories ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4825-6 Eur

    A. Salvio, `` Inflationary perturbations in no-scale theories ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4825-6 Eur. Phys. J. C 77 no. 4, (Apr, 2017) 267 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.08012 arXiv:1703.08012

    2017 arXiv

  28. [36]

    D. M. Ghilencea, `` Weyl R ^ 2 inflation with an emergent Planck scale ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2019)209 JHEP 10 (2019) 209 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.11572 arXiv:1906.11572 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Edery and Y

    A. Edery and Y. Nakayama, `` Critical gravity from four dimensional scale invariant gravity ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2019)169 Journal of High Energy Physics 2019 no. 11, (Nov, 2019) 169 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.08778 arXiv:1908.08778

    2019 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Anselmi, E

    D. Anselmi, E. Bianchi, and M. Piva, `` Predictions of quantum gravity in inflationary cosmology: effects of the Weyl-squared term ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2020)211 JHEP 07 (2020) 211 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.10293 arXiv:2005.10293 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Salvio, `` Dimensional Transmutation in Gravity and Cosmology ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X21300064 Int

    A. Salvio, `` Dimensional Transmutation in Gravity and Cosmology ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X21300064 Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36 no. 08n09, (2021) 2130006 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.11608 arXiv:2012.11608 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  32. [40]

    J. Kubo, J. Kuntz, J. Rezacek, and P. Saake, `` Inflation with massive spin-2 ghosts ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/11/049 JCAP 11 (2022) 049 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.14329 arXiv:2207.14329 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  33. [41]

    De Felice, R

    A. De Felice, R. Kawaguchi, K. Mizui, and S. Tsujikawa, `` Starobinsky inflation with a quadratic Weyl tensor ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.123524 Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 12, (2023) 123524 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01835 arXiv:2309.01835 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    K. S. Stelle, `` Classical Gravity with Higher Derivatives ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00760427 Gen. Rel. Grav. 9 (1978) 353--371

    1978 doi

  35. [43]

    T. D. Lee and G. C. Wick, `` Negative Metric and the Unitarity of the S Matrix ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(69)90098-4 Nucl. Phys. B 9 (1969) 209--243

    1969 doi

  36. [44]

    T. D. Lee, `` A relativistic complex pole model with indefinite metric, in Quanta: Essays in Theoretical Physics Dedicated to Gregor Wentzel (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1970), p. 260, 1969 ,''

    1970

  37. [45]

    T. D. Lee and G. C. Wick, `` Finite theory of quantum electrodynamics ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.2.1033 Phys. Rev. D 2 no. 6, (1970) 1033--1048

    1970 doi

  38. [46]

    D. G. Boulware, G. T. Horowitz, and A. Strominger, `` Zero Energy Theorem for Scale Invariant Gravity ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1726 Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 (1983) 1726

    1983 doi

  39. [47]

    P. D. Mannheim, `` Making the Case for Conformal Gravity ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10701-011-9608-6 Found. Phys. 42 (2012) 388--420 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.2186 arXiv:1101.2186 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Salvio, `` Quadratic Gravity ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2018.00077 Front

    A. Salvio, `` Quadratic Gravity ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2018.00077 Front. in Phys. 6 (2018) 77 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1804.09944 arXiv:1804.09944 [hep-th]

    2018

  41. [49]

    Anselmi and M

    D. Anselmi and M. Piva, `` Quantum Gravity, Fakeons And Microcausality ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2018)021 JHEP 11 (2018) 021 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03605 arXiv:1806.03605 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  42. [50]

    J. F. Donoghue and G. Menezes, `` Unitarity, stability and loops of unstable ghosts ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.105006 Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 10, (2019) 105006 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.02416 arXiv:1908.02416 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Kuntz, `` Unitarity through PT symmetry in Quantum Quadratic Gravity ,'' http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.08278 arXiv:2410.08278

    J. Kuntz, `` Unitarity through PT symmetry in Quantum Quadratic Gravity ,'' http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.08278 arXiv:2410.08278 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.08278

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Kubo and T

    J. Kubo and T. Kugo, `` Unitarity violation in field theories of Lee Wick s complex ghost ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptad143 PTEP 2023 no. 12, (2023) 123B02 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.09006 arXiv:2308.09006 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Kubo and T

    J. Kubo and T. Kugo, `` Anti-Instability of Complex Ghost ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptae053 PTEP 2024 no. 5, (2024) 053B01 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15956 arXiv:2402.15956 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    A. R. Liddle and D. H. Lyth, `` COBE, gravitational waves, inflation and extended inflation ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(92)91393-N Phys. Lett. B 291 (1992) 391--398 , http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9208007 arXiv:astro-ph/9208007

    1992 arXiv

  47. [55]

    M. S. Turner, `` On the production of scalar and tensor perturbations in inflationary models ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.48.3502 Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 3502--3512 , http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9302013 arXiv:astro-ph/9302013

    1993 arXiv

  48. [56]

    J. E. Lidsey, A. R. Liddle, E. W. Kolb, E. J. Copeland, T. Barreiro, and M. Abney, `` Reconstructing the inflation potential : An overview ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.69.373 Rev. Mod. Phys. 69 (1997) 373--410 , http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9508078 arXiv:astro-ph/9508078

    1997 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Anselmi, `` Fakeons And Lee-Wick Models ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2018)141 JHEP 02 (2018) 141 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1801.00915 arXiv:1801.00915 [hep-th]

    D. Anselmi, `` Fakeons And Lee-Wick Models ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2018)141 JHEP 02 (2018) 141 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1801.00915 arXiv:1801.00915 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Kubo and J

    J. Kubo and J. Kuntz, `` Analysis of unitarity in conformal quantum gravity ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ac8199 Class. Quant. Grav. 39 no. 17, (2022) 175010 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.08298 arXiv:2202.08298 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Kubo and J

    J. Kubo and J. Kuntz, `` Spontaneous conformal symmetry breaking and quantum quadratic gravity ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.126015 Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 12, (2022) 126015 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.12832 arXiv:2208.12832 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Vilenkin and L

    A. Vilenkin and L. H. Ford, `` Gravitational Effects upon Cosmological Phase Transitions ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.26.1231 Phys. Rev. D 26 (1982) 1231

    1982 doi

  53. [61]

    A. D. Linde, `` Scalar Field Fluctuations in Expanding Universe and the New Inflationary Universe Scenario ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(82)90293-3 Phys. Lett. B 116 (1982) 335--339

    1982 doi

  54. [62]

    T. S. Bunch and P. C. W. Davies, `` Quantum Field Theory in de Sitter Space: Renormalization by Point Splitting ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1978.0060 Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 360 (1978) 117--134

    1978

  55. [63]

    L. Pilo, A. Riotto, and A. Zaffaroni, `` On the amount of gravitational waves from inflation ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.201303 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 201303 , http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0401302 arXiv:astro-ph/0401302

    2004 arXiv

  56. [64]

    A. Salvio, `` BICEP/Keck data and quadratic gravity ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/027 JCAP 09 (2022) 027 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.00684 arXiv:2202.00684 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  57. [65]

    A. H. Guth and S.-Y. Pi, `` The Quantum Mechanics of the Scalar Field in the New Inflationary Universe ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.32.1899 Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 1899--1920

    1985 doi

  58. [66]

    Polarski and A

    D. Polarski and A. A. Starobinsky, `` Semiclassicality and decoherence of cosmological perturbations ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/13/3/006 Class. Quant. Grav. 13 (1996) 377--392 , http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9504030 arXiv:gr-qc/9504030

    1996 arXiv

  59. [67]

    D. H. Lyth and D. Seery, `` Classicality of the primordial perturbations ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2008.03.010 Phys. Lett. B 662 (2008) 309--313 , http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0607647 arXiv:astro-ph/0607647

    2008 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Martineau, `` On the decoherence of primordial fluctuations during inflation ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/24/23/006 Class

    P. Martineau, `` On the decoherence of primordial fluctuations during inflation ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/24/23/006 Class. Quant. Grav. 24 (2007) 5817--5834 , http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0601134 arXiv:astro-ph/0601134

    2007 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Kiefer and D

    C. Kiefer and D. Polarski, `` Why do cosmological perturbations look classical to us? ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1166/asl.2009.1023 Adv. Sci. Lett. 2 (2009) 164--173 , http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.0087 arXiv:0810.0087 [astro-ph]

    2009

  62. [70]

    E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780429492860 The Early Universe , vol. 69. 1990

    1990 doi

  63. [71]

    D. J. Chung, E. W. Kolb, and A. Riotto, `` Production of massive particles during reheating ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.063504 Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 063504 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9809453 arXiv:hep-ph/9809453

    1999 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Kawasaki and T

    S. Kawasaki and T. Kimura, `` A Possible Mechanism of Ghost Confinement in a Renormalizable Quantum Gravity ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTP.65.1767 Prog. Theor. Phys. 65 (1981) 1767

    1981 doi

  65. [73]

    Arkani-Hamed, H.-C

    N. Arkani-Hamed, H.-C. Cheng, M. A. Luty, and S. Mukohyama, `` Ghost condensation and a consistent infrared modification of gravity ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2004/05/074 JHEP 05 (2004) 074 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0312099 arXiv:hep-th/0312099

    2004 arXiv

  66. [74]

    S. Mukohyama, `` Ghost condensate and generalized second law ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2009/09/070 JHEP 09 (2009) 070 , http://arxiv.org/abs/0901.3595 arXiv:0901.3595 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  67. [75]

    M. J. G. Veltman, `` Unitarity and causality in a renormalizable field theory with unstable particles ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-8914(63)80277-3 Physica 29 (1963) 186--207

    1963 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.