Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 78 references

Most confining pseudoreal gauge theories leave a free massless spin-1 boson in the infrared.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 02:20 UTC pith:NRJMOZU5

load-bearing objection Systematic IR spectrum for the whole class of minimal pseudoreal theories, with a clean massless-spin-1 prediction that is heuristic but testable. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.09531 v1 pith:NRJMOZU5 submitted 2026-07-10 hep-th hep-lathep-ph

Perusing confining pseudoreal theories: a story of emerging massless spin-1 bosons

Giacomo Cacciapaglia , Konstantinos Kollias This is my paper
classification hep-th hep-lathep-ph
keywords pseudoreal gauge theoriesconfinementmassless spin-1 bosonstumblingconformal windowdiscrete anomaliesWeyl fermions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Pseudoreal gauge theories sit between vector-like and chiral theories: they admit a real Euclidean path integral yet still leave at least one Weyl fermion massless. After discarding those that are likely conformal, the paper maps the infrared of the remainder by tumbling, discrete-anomaly matching, and operator analysis. In every one-species model except one the most attractive channel is the adjoint bilinear; the resulting condensate gaps the fermions and leaves exactly one free massless photon-like state associated with the axial current. The single non-conformal two-species theory produces two such massless vectors plus one Nambu-Goldstone boson. The claim supplies a concrete, testable prediction for a whole class of theories whose infrared dynamics had remained largely unexplored.

Core claim

Among all asymptotically free pseudoreal theories that lie outside the conformal window, every one-species model but one confines with a non-trivial four-fermion condensate and features exactly one free massless spin-1 state in the deep infrared; the sole confining two-species theory (Sp(6) with fundamentals plus three-index antisymmetric) yields two massless spin-1 states and one Nambu-Goldstone boson.

What carries the argument

Most-attractive-channel tumbling with score Δ = 2C_r - C_R: the channel of largest positive Δ is assigned a vacuum expectation value that breaks the gauge group to a subgroup times an unbroken free U(1), leaving a massless photon-like state.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the most attractive bilinear channel really condenses and that the unbroken U(1) it produces remains free and massless in the deep infrared.

What would settle it

A lattice simulation of the SU(6) theory with a single three-index antisymmetric Weyl fermion that finds either no massless spin-1 state or more than one, or a functional-renormalization-group calculation that shows the would-be U(1) current acquiring a mass gap.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript classifies the infrared dynamics of all minimal asymptotically free pseudoreal gauge theories with one or two massless Weyl fermions (Table I). Using an all-orders beta-function ansatz (Eqs. (1)–(3)), it separates theories that are likely conformal from those that are not. For the non-conformal cases it applies a most-attractive-channel (MAC) tumbling analysis based on the score Δ = 2C_r − C_R (Eq. (6)), finds that the adjoint bilinear is almost always the MAC, and concludes that the gauge group breaks to H × U(1)_X, leaving a free massless spin-1 boson. Discrete and one-form symmetries (Table II), the absence of fermionic composites, and the structure of the two-fermion current A_μ = ψ† σ_μ ψ (Eq. (11)) and the four-fermion operator X_R (Eqs. (4), (12)) are used as consistency checks. The headline claim is that all but one confining one-species theory features exactly one free massless spin-1 state, while the single confining two-species theory (Sp(6) with 6_F + 14′_A3) features two massless spin-1 states plus one Nambu–Goldstone boson.

Significance. Pseudoreal theories sit between the well-studied vector-like and chiral classes and have received little systematic attention. Completing their IR classification is a genuine contribution to the non-perturbative map of four-dimensional gauge theories. The paper produces a concrete, falsifiable spectrum prediction (massless free spin-1 states) that can be tested by lattice simulations, functional renormalization-group methods, or supersymmetric analogs—tools the authors themselves flag. The multi-pronged consistency checks (beta-function window, tumbling, discrete anomalies, operator content) give the claim more weight than a pure tumbling exercise would have. If the massless-spin-1 spectrum survives non-perturbative scrutiny, it would constitute a new, unexpected IR phase of asymptotically free gauge theories.

major comments (3)
  1. The central massless-spin-1 claim rests on two uncontrolled steps. First, the MAC score Δ = 2C_r − C_R (Eq. (6) and columns 5–8 of Table I) is a one-gluon-exchange estimate; for the one-species theories it always selects the adjoint, which is then assumed to leave an unbroken free U(1)_X. Second, after Eq. (11) the paper identifies the only available two-fermion operator A_μ with that photon and asserts that residual strong dynamics of H cannot generate a mass for it, because the ’t Hooft operator carries U(1)_A charge while A_μ does not. The Fierz identity X_R ∼ A_μ A_μ (Eq. (12)) is noted but not shown to protect the masslessness of A_μ against higher-dimension operators or residual H dynamics. Without a positive argument that the residual mass vanishes, the headline spectrum is not robust.
  2. The conformal-window criterion (Eq. (3)) is applied even though the authors themselves note that for n_r = 1 the bilinear vanishes and γ*_r is ill-defined. Several one-species theories are therefore labeled “likely” conformal or “out” on the basis of an extrapolation that the paper itself flags as unreliable. This classification feeds directly into which theories receive the tumbling analysis and which are declared to host massless spin-1 states; a more conservative treatment of the n_r = 1 edge is needed.
  3. For the two-species Sp(6) theory the paper invokes both the MAC and the next-to-MAC channels (and the strong-anomaly requirement of a VEV for the ’t Hooft operator) to obtain two massless U(1)s plus an NGB. The simultaneous condensation of two channels is postulated rather than derived, and the resulting unbroken group SU(2)×U(1)×U(1) is only one of several possible residual subgroups. The two-spin-1 + NGB spectrum is therefore less firmly established than the one-species claim.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Heuristic MAC tumbling and beta-function ansatz applied to a new list; massless-spin-1 claim is an uncontrolled inference, not a circular reduction of inputs.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Introduction / Table I caption; Ref. [40]]
    "leaving us with a handful of asymptotic free pseudoreal theories, which were first classified in [40]. TABLE I. Summary of pseudoreal gauge theories [40] defined in terms of the gauge group G and the representations of the one or two fermion species"

    The complete list of theories that is analyzed (and for which the massless-spin-1 claim is made) is taken from the authors’ own prior classification paper. The list itself is not re-derived; it is imported by self-citation. The subsequent dynamical analysis is independent of that citation, so the circularity is minor and non-load-bearing for the IR prediction.

full rationale

The paper classifies pseudoreal theories (Table I) and predicts that confining one-species models (except Spin(11)) leave exactly one free massless spin-1, while the Sp(6) two-species model leaves two spin-1s plus an NGB. The conformal-window cut uses the Ryttov–Sannino/Pica–Sannino all-orders beta-function ansatz (Eqs. (1)–(3)); the IR spectrum uses the classical MAC score Δ = 2Cr − CR (Eq. (6)) that selects the adjoint bilinear, which breaks G → H × U(1)X and leaves a free photon (Table I columns 5–8 and the SU(6)/Spin(12)/E7 examples). Discrete-anomaly matching and the identification of the only two-fermion operator Aμ = ψ†σμψ (Eq. (11)) are independent cross-checks. None of these steps is definitionally equivalent to the massless-spin-1 conclusion: the beta-function bound and MAC score are taken from the prior literature and applied without fitting to the target spectrum; self-citations supply the input list of theories and some anomaly facts for SU(6) but do not force the IR prediction. The residual risk that residual H dynamics or a Fierz-rearranged four-fermion condensate (Eq. (12)) could still gap Aμ is a correctness/control issue, not circularity. Score 2 reflects only minor, non-load-bearing self-citation of the authors’ classification paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on three layers of unproved but standard domain machinery (all-orders beta-function ansatz, MAC tumbling, anomaly matching without fermionic composites) plus one paper-specific modeling step (that the adjoint bilinear VEV is the correct infrared condensate and leaves a free U(1)). No numerical free parameters are fitted. No new particles or forces are postulated as inputs; the massless spin-1 states are outputs of the analysis.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The conjectured all-orders beta function of Ryttov–Sannino / Pica–Sannino correctly diagnoses the lower edge of the conformal window via the bound γ*_r > −2 (Eqs. 1–3).
    Invoked in “Sitting below the conformal window” to label theories “likely,” “out,” or “?”. The ansatz is not derived for non-supersymmetric theories and is known to be unreliable for n_r = 1.
  • domain assumption The most attractive channel is the bilinear channel with largest positive Δ = 2 C_r − C_R, and a VEV for that channel correctly captures the infrared condensate dynamics (tumbling).
    Central to the “Tumbling analysis” section and to columns 5–8 of Table I. One-gluon-exchange estimate; not controlled at strong coupling.
  • domain assumption No gauge-invariant spin-1/2 composite operators can be formed from an odd number of pseudoreal Weyl fermions, so all anomalous global symmetries must be spontaneously broken.
    Used in “Gauge-invariant operators” and discrete-symmetry matching to force condensates and to exclude massless fermions in the IR.
  • ad hoc to paper The axial anomaly cannot give a mass to the spin-1 current A_μ = ψ† σ_μ ψ in the absence of a light scalar that could serve as its longitudinal mode.
    Stated in the paragraph after Eq. (11) by analogy with the QCD ω versus η′. This step converts the existence of the current into the claim that it remains exactly massless.
  • domain assumption Four-fermion operators X_R in the MAC channel can be Fierz-rearranged into A_μ A^μ, so a condensate for X_R is equivalent to a condensate for the spin-1 current.
    Eq. (12) and the surrounding discussion; used to reconcile the gauge-invariant and tumbling pictures.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 20417 in / 3611 out tokens · 42877 ms · 2026-07-13T02:20:22.341774+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Solving quantum field theory, which is at the basis of the standard model of particle interactions, is one of the main tasks of contemporary theoretical physics. Minimal asymptotically free pseudoreal theories, containing one or two species of massless Weyl fermions in pseudoreal representations of the gauge group, flow towards a poorly understood infrared dynamics. We provide a comprehensive study of all pseudoreal theories, identifying the ones that likely flow towards a conformal dynamics, while we show that the remaining ones confine with a non-trivial condensate dynamics. Among the latter, all but one one-species theories feature a massless spin-1 state. Instead, the only confining two-species theory likely features two massless spin-1 states and one Nambu-Goldstone boson. These predictions could be further tested, for instance by use of Lattice simulations, the functional renormalization group, and supersymmetric analogs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 40 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Yang and R

    C.-N. Yang and R. L. Mills, Conservation of Isotopic Spin and Isotopic Gauge Invariance, Phys. Rev.96, 191 (1954)

    1954

  2. [2]

    Englert and R

    F. Englert and R. Brout, Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett.13, 321 (1964)

    1964

  3. [3]

    P . W. Higgs, Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.13, 508 (1964)

    1964

  4. [4]

    H. D. Politzer, Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions?, Phys. Rev. Lett.30, 1346 (1973)

    1973

  5. [5]

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Ultraviolet Behavior of Non- abelian Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.30, 1343 (1973)

    1973

  6. [6]

    Weinberg, Ultraviolet Divergences in Quantum Theo- ries of Gravitation, inGeneral Relativity: An Einstein Cen- tenary Survey(1980) pp

    S. Weinberg, Ultraviolet Divergences in Quantum Theo- ries of Gravitation, inGeneral Relativity: An Einstein Cen- tenary Survey(1980) pp. 790–831

    1980

  7. [7]

    D. F. Litim and F. Sannino, Asymptotic safety guaranteed, JHEP12, 178, arXiv:1406.2337 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    Grosset al., 50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics, Eur

    F. Grosset al., 50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 1125 (2023), arXiv:2212.11107 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Vafa and E

    C. Vafa and E. Witten, Restrictions on Symmetry Break- ing in Vector-Like Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys. B234, 173 (1984)

    1984

  10. [10]

    Vafa and E

    C. Vafa and E. Witten, Parity Conservation in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.53, 535 (1984)

    1984

  11. [11]

    Eichten and J

    E. Eichten and J. Preskill, Chiral Gauge Theories on the Lattice, Nucl. Phys. B268, 179 (1986)

    1986

  12. [12]

    Eichten, R

    E. Eichten, R. D. Peccei, J. Preskill, and D. Zeppenfeld, Chiral Gauge Theories in the 1/N Expansion, Nucl. Phys. B268, 161 (1986)

    1986

  13. [13]

    Georgi and S

    H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Unity of All Elementary Particle Forces, Phys. Rev. Lett.32, 438 (1974)

    1974

  14. [14]

    Bars and S

    I. Bars and S. Yankielowicz, Composite Quarks and Lep- tons as Solutions of Anomaly Constraints, Phys. Lett. B 101, 159 (1981)

    1981

  15. [15]

    Sannino, Conformal Chiral Dynamics, Phys

    F. Sannino, Conformal Chiral Dynamics, Phys. Rev. D80, 017901 (2009), arXiv:0811.0616 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  16. [16]

    Sannino, Conformal Dynamics for TeV Physics and Cosmology, Acta Phys

    F. Sannino, Conformal Dynamics for TeV Physics and Cosmology, Acta Phys. Polon. B40, 3533 (2009), arXiv:0911.0931 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  17. [17]

    Poppitz and M

    E. Poppitz and M. Unsal, Chiral gauge dynamics and dynamical supersymmetry breaking, JHEP07, 060, arXiv:0905.0634 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Poppitz and M

    E. Poppitz and M. Unsal, Conformality or confinement: (IR)relevance of topological excitations, JHEP09, 050, arXiv:0906.5156 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    Bolognesi and K

    S. Bolognesi and K. Konishi, Dynamics and symmetries in chiralSU(N) gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D100, 114008 (2019), arXiv:1906.01485 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    Bolognesi, K

    S. Bolognesi, K. Konishi, and A. Luzio, Dynamics from symmetries in chiralSU(N) gauge theories, JHEP09, 001, arXiv:2004.06639 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  21. [21]

    Bolognesi, K

    S. Bolognesi, K. Konishi, and A. Luzio, Strong anomaly and phases of chiral gauge theories, JHEP08, 028, arXiv:2105.03921 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    Cs ´aki, H

    C. Cs ´aki, H. Murayama, and O. Telem, More exact results on chiral gauge theories: The case of the symmetric tensor, Phys. Rev. D105, 045007 (2022), arXiv:2105.03444 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Cs ´aki, H

    C. Cs ´aki, H. Murayama, and O. Telem, Some exact results in chiral gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D104, 065018 (2021), arXiv:2104.10171 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Bolognesi, K

    S. Bolognesi, K. Konishi, and A. Luzio, Anomalies and phases of strongly coupled chiral gauge theories: Recent developments, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A37, 2230014 (2022), arXiv:2110.02104 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    H.-L. Li, ´A. Pastor-Guti ´errez, S. Vatani, and L.-X. Xu, Dynamical symmetry breaking in Georgi-Glashow chiral- gauge theories, JHEP12, 020, arXiv:2507.21208 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  26. [26]

    H. Li, ´A. Pastor-Guti ´errez, and S. Vatani, Confinement without symmetry breaking in chiral gauge theories (2026), arXiv:2603.19355 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    S. Raby, S. Dimopoulos, and L. Susskind, Tumbling Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys. B169, 373 (1980)

    1980

  28. [28]

    ’t Hooft, Symmetry Breaking Through Bell-Jackiw Anomalies, Phys

    G. ’t Hooft, Symmetry Breaking Through Bell-Jackiw Anomalies, Phys. Rev. Lett.37, 8 (1976)

    1976

  29. [29]

    ’t Hooft, Computation of the Quantum Effects Due to a Four-Dimensional Pseudoparticle, Phys

    G. ’t Hooft, Computation of the Quantum Effects Due to a Four-Dimensional Pseudoparticle, Phys. Rev. D14, 3432 (1976), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 18, 2199 (1978)]

    1976

  30. [30]

    ’t Hooft, Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and sponta- neous chiral symmetry breaking, NATO Sci

    G. ’t Hooft, Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and sponta- neous chiral symmetry breaking, NATO Sci. Ser. B59, 135 (1980)

    1980

  31. [31]

    Banks and A

    T. Banks and A. Zaks, On the Phase Structure of Vector- Like Gauge Theories with Massless Fermions, Nucl. Phys. B196, 189 (1982)

    1982

  32. [32]

    D. D. Dietrich and F. Sannino, Conformal window of SU(N) gauge theories with fermions in higher dimen- sional representations, Phys. Rev. D75, 085018 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0611341

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  33. [33]

    Sannino, Conformal Windows of SP(2N) and SO(N) Gauge Theories, Phys

    F. Sannino, Conformal Windows of SP(2N) and SO(N) Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. D79, 096007 (2009), arXiv:0902.3494 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  34. [34]

    T. A. Ryttov and F. Sannino, Conformal House, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A25, 4603 (2010), arXiv:0906.0307 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  35. [35]

    Mojaza, C

    M. Mojaza, C. Pica, T. A. Ryttov, and F. Sannino, Excep- tional and Spinorial Conformal Windows, Phys. Rev. D 86, 076012 (2012), arXiv:1206.2652 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  36. [36]

    Witten, An SU(2) Anomaly, Phys

    E. Witten, An SU(2) Anomaly, Phys. Lett. B117, 324 (1982)

    1982

  37. [37]

    Okubo and Y

    S. Okubo and Y. Tosa, Further Study of Global Gauge Anomalies of Simple Groups, Phys. Rev. D40, 1925 (1989)

    1925

  38. [38]

    Okubo and H

    S. Okubo and H. Zhang, Global gauge anomaly of clas- 9 Gauge group Matter Center Rep. charge One-form sym. DiscreteU(1) A remnant Grav. anomaly SU(2)4 S3 (*) Z2 1 trivial Z10 4 mod 5 :Z 10 →Z 2 Sp(6)56 S3 (*) Z2 1 trivial Z36 2 mod 18 :Z 36 →Z 4 ,Z 2 Sp(6)64 R11 Z2 1 trivial Z32 0 mod 16 :Z 32 Sp(10)132 A5 Z2 1 trivial Z42 6 mod 21 :Z 42 →Z 6 ,Z 2 Sp(12)2...

    1989

  39. [39]

    Wang, X.-G

    J. Wang, X.-G. Wen, and E. Witten, A New SU(2) Anomaly, J. Math. Phys.60, 052301 (2019), arXiv:1810.00844 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  40. [40]

    Cacciapaglia, K

    G. Cacciapaglia, K. Kollias, A. Deandrea, and F. Sannino, Selection toolkit for standard and non-standard GUTs, Phys. Rev. D113, 075043 (2026)

    2026

  41. [41]

    Csaki and H

    C. Csaki and H. Murayama, Discrete anomaly matching, Nucl. Phys. B515, 114 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9710105

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  42. [42]

    Aharony, N

    O. Aharony, N. Seiberg, and Y. Tachikawa, Reading be- tween the lines of four-dimensional gauge theories, JHEP 08, 115, arXiv:1305.0318 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    Gaiotto, A

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, Gener- alized Global Symmetries, JHEP02, 172, arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Yamaguchi, ’t Hooft anomaly matching condition and chiral symmetry breaking without bilinear condensate, JHEP01, 014, arXiv:1811.09390 [hep-th]

    S. Yamaguchi, ’t Hooft anomaly matching condition and chiral symmetry breaking without bilinear condensate, JHEP01, 014, arXiv:1811.09390 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Bolognesi, K

    S. Bolognesi, K. Konishi, and A. Luzio, Gauging 1-form center symmetries in simpleSU(N) gauge theories, JHEP 01, 048, arXiv:1909.06598 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1909

  46. [46]

    Yamaoka, T

    T. Yamaoka, T. Onogi, and H. Wada, SU(6) model revisited, PoSLATTICE2024, 402 (2025), arXiv:2501.18165 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    T. A. Ryttov and F. Sannino, Supersymmetry inspired QCD beta function, Phys. Rev. D78, 065001 (2008), arXiv:0711.3745 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  48. [48]

    Pica and F

    C. Pica and F. Sannino, Beta Function and Anomalous Di- mensions, Phys. Rev. D83, 116001 (2011), arXiv:1011.3832 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  49. [49]

    Dimopoulos, S

    S. Dimopoulos, S. Raby, and L. Susskind, Light Composite Fermions, Nucl. Phys. B173, 208 (1980)

    1980

  50. [50]

    V . A. Novikov, M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V . I. Zakharov, Exact Gell-Mann-Low Function of Supersym- metric Yang-Mills Theories from Instanton Calculus, Nucl. Phys. B229, 381 (1983)

    1983

  51. [51]

    Bolognesi, K

    S. Bolognesi, K. Konishi, and M. Shifman, Patterns of sym- metry breaking in chiral QCD, Phys. Rev. D97, 094007 (2018), arXiv:1712.04814 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  52. [52]

    Hence, no condensate can possibly form

    Intriguingly, for Witten-anomalous theories defined by Sp(2N) withrequal to the defining representation, the ad- joint is the only channel, however with∆ =−1/2. Hence, no condensate can possibly form

  53. [53]

    Slansky, Group Theory for Unified Model Building, Phys

    R. Slansky, Group Theory for Unified Model Building, Phys. Rept.79, 1 (1981)

    1981

  54. [54]

    Feger, T

    R. Feger, T. W. Kephart, and R. J. Saskowski, LieART 2.0 – A Mathematica application for Lie Algebras and Rep- resentation Theory, Comput. Phys. Commun.257, 107490 (2020), arXiv:1912.10969 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    Iqbal, Jena lectures on generalized global symmetries: principles and applications (2024) arXiv:2407.20815 [hep- th]

    N. Iqbal, Jena lectures on generalized global symmetries: principles and applications (2024) arXiv:2407.20815 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    E. H. Fradkin and S. H. Shenker, Phase Diagrams of Lattice Gauge Theories with Higgs Fields, Phys. Rev. D19, 3682 (1979)

    1979

  57. [57]

    Giacosa, Revisiting the axial anomaly for light mesons and baryons, PoSHadron2017, 045 (2018), arXiv:1712.04664 [hep-ph]

    F. Giacosa, Revisiting the axial anomaly for light mesons and baryons, PoSHadron2017, 045 (2018), arXiv:1712.04664 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  58. [58]

    This observation is coherent with the Weinberg-Witten theorem [78], even though the U(1)A symmetry is broken at quantum level by the gauge anomaly

  59. [59]

    F. A. Bais and J. M. Frere, Composite Vector Fields and Tumbling Gauge Theories, Phys. Lett. B98, 431 (1981)

    1981

  60. [60]

    J. D. Bjorken, A Dynamical origin for the electromagnetic field, Annals Phys.24, 174 (1963)

    1963

  61. [61]

    Amati, R

    D. Amati, R. Barbieri, A. C. Davis, and G. Veneziano, Dynamical Gauge Bosons From Fundamental Fermions, Phys. Lett. B102, 408 (1981)

    1981

  62. [62]

    K. G. Akdeniz, M. Arik, M. Hortacsu, and N. K. Pak, Gauge Bosons as Composites of Fermions, Phys. Lett. B 124, 79 (1983)

    1983

  63. [63]

    M. H. Friedman and Y. N. Srivastava, Gauge Theories with Composite Bosons, Phys. Rev. D28, 1491 (1983)

    1983

  64. [64]

    Lauer, Composite Massless Vector Field Obtained from Fundamental Fermions, Z

    J. Lauer, Composite Massless Vector Field Obtained from Fundamental Fermions, Z. Phys. C40, 565 (1988)

    1988

  65. [65]

    Suzuki, Dynamical Composite Models of Electroweak Bosons, Phys

    M. Suzuki, Dynamical Composite Models of Electroweak Bosons, Phys. Rev. D37, 210 (1988)

    1988

  66. [66]

    Palumbo, Composite gauge fields in renormalizable models, Phys

    F. Palumbo, Composite gauge fields in renormalizable models, Phys. Rev. D48, R1917 (1993)

    1993

  67. [67]

    B. S. Balakrishna and K. T. Mahanthappa, Composite gauge field models with broken symmetries, Phys. Rev. D49, R2653 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9310094

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  68. [68]

    B. S. Balakrishna and K. T. Mahanthappa, Composite gauge fields and broken symmetries, Phys. Rev. D52, 2379 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9503096

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  69. [69]

    J. L. Chkareuli, Emergent gauge theories and supersym- metry: a QED primer, Phys. Lett. B721, 146 (2013), arXiv:1212.6939 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  70. [70]

    J. L. Chkareuli, Gauge Fields as Goldstone Bosons Trig- gered by Spontaneously Broken Supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D90, 065015 (2014), arXiv:1305.6898 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  71. [71]

    Afferrante, A

    V . Afferrante, A. Maas, and P . T¨orek, Composite mass- less vector boson, Phys. Rev. D101, 114506 (2020), arXiv:2002.08221 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  72. [72]

    J. L. Chkareuli, Gauge Fields as Constrained Composite Bosons, Phys. Lett. B817, 136281 (2021), arXiv:2102.11217 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  73. [73]

    Cacciapaglia, A

    G. Cacciapaglia, A. S. Cornell, A. Deandrea, W. Isnard, R. Pasechnik, A. Preda, and Z.-W. Wang, General vacuum stability of orbifold gauge breaking and application to asymptotic grand unification, Phys. Rev. D111, 095013 (2025), arXiv:2409.16137 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the effective potential, Phys

    C. Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the effective potential, Phys. Lett. B301, 90 (1993), arXiv:1710.05815 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  75. [75]

    Dupuis, L

    N. Dupuis, L. Canet, A. Eichhorn, W. Metzner, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, The nonpertur- 10 bative functional renormalization group and its applica- tions, Phys. Rept.910, 1 (2021), arXiv:2006.04853 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  76. [76]

    Csaki, M

    C. Csaki, M. Schmaltz, and W. Skiba, Confinement in N=1 SUSY gauge theories and model building tools, Phys. Rev. D55, 7840 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9612207

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  77. [77]

    Murayama, Some Exact Results in QCD-like Theories, Phys

    H. Murayama, Some Exact Results in QCD-like Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 251601 (2021), arXiv:2104.01179 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  78. [78]

    Weinberg and E

    S. Weinberg and E. Witten, Limits on Massless Particles, Phys. Lett. B96, 59 (1980)

    1980