REVIEW 1 cited by
The Shape of Explanations: A Topological Account of Rule-Based Explanations in Machine Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Rule-based explanations provide simple reasons explaining the behavior of machine learning classifiers at given points in the feature space. Several recent methods (Anchors, LORE, etc.) purport to generate rule-based explanations for arbitrary or black-box classifiers. But what makes these methods work in general? We introduce a topological framework for rule-based explanation methods and provide a characterization of explainability in terms of the definability of a classifier relative to an explanation scheme. We employ this framework to consider various explanation schemes and argue that the preferred scheme depends on how much the user knows about the domain and the probability measure over the feature space.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
xpSHACL: Explainable SHACL Validation using Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Large Language Models
xpSHACL combines a rule-based trace of why a SHACL constraint failed with RAG and an LLM to generate human-readable, cached explanations for RDF validation violations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.