Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits

As of 17 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 29 of 29 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2509.10437.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2509.10437 v1

Coverage vector

measured 29 of 29 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.399157Z

measured 31 of 31 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00

measured 2 of 2 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-02T23:02:00.127624Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: pith, observed 2026-07-10T23:37:44.684937Z

Reference resolution

29 of 29 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact3
  • verified fuzzy11
  • unresolved15
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation 9417f01e-b6cc-42dd-a3de-2c41a4e400ab · outbound

This paper cites Quantum Theory at the Crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Quantum Theory at the Crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference

Reference 1

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.304306Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.304306Z digest=sha256:4bf50162ecb3f2dda519388ee4c00d47be42482904f45a004ebcdf127a4db225

Observation 7bad5650-9bce-4900-8495-fdbd4fe5a551 · outbound

This paper cites Einstein, B.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Einstein, B

Reference 2

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.308542Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.308542Z digest=sha256:769b8d7341c80334470e95b0b6c8bbdb2598902d49ffd2a1578012cea4f823e5

Observation 16c9295a-38df-4176-8096-5a36dce2d8eb · outbound

This paper cites The einstein-podolsky-rosen argument in quan- tum theory,.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits The einstein-podolsky-rosen argument in quan- tum theory,

Reference 3

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.693326Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.312248Z digest=sha256:aa632ceec42404641ff7a88f1ba3876ca1f06f6a3c4b63332d5037a2c6b446ca

Observation 929d0f7b-47ea-4130-b7cd-334adb137925 · outbound

This paper cites Relational quantum mechanics,.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Relational quantum mechanics,

Reference 4

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.681576Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.315220Z digest=sha256:68a6a007e19bd00e1f47a31f6c5445f664299551971a41c706bf4b51e81801a3

Observation 0fdead82-5a8e-470e-89e2-fdaa82e64fe6 · outbound

This paper cites Copenhagenish interpretations of quantum mechanics.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Copenhagenish interpretations of quantum mechanics

Reference 5

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.480899Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.318524Z digest=sha256:f3aa3bea83c0f76feec9b421e282072ff4500bfaab3b28711e1b98297079b392

Observation 832273c4-5121-476a-80cc-98a8aa949555 · outbound

This paper cites Harrigan and R.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Harrigan and R

Reference 6

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.671962Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.321879Z digest=sha256:da204c1e17600b5e3fbd7c3a76aa1509af6431cf0a42ac0c9ab169ec19461182

Observation bbb08172-5eb1-4a16-b0ac-479d6017b110 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Unresolved cited work

Reference 7

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.324969Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.324969Z digest=sha256:7918807efde7bc37e01e3edcde2589a99a5c50186c4526b79f8f260cdd683f30

Observation 82282539-26e1-4da6-9321-8630d414bd59 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Unresolved cited work

Reference 8

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.656540Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.329149Z digest=sha256:d05d50bf8abe00a8cfd7fb08db33b0e4be0ea4f2e60e0eb5c5aa12eefd1b35e4

Observation 5043eb87-dfb5-4e77-a70a-bba8e6b3985d · outbound

This paper cites Aaronson, A.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Aaronson, A

Reference 9

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.645252Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.333186Z digest=sha256:4a193958b1e8f0808edfee582d2f729af4df7c6ef4a5a595685049e1f4ed5af2

Observation 165ca7e6-7a0a-49ae-92ee-fcd71d6452b0 · outbound

This paper cites Barrett, E.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Barrett, E

Reference 10

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.337099Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.337099Z digest=sha256:65af37d23905f748796869fdfda88d2504ce1694e2f118f33d0a72dfc11ba8b0

Observation e9f20d50-2350-453f-8eae-2d5f505d0e77 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Unresolved cited work

Reference 11

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.628119Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.341099Z digest=sha256:ca1fb863b62b2bf5fc347ea073c35e667e067ac333ceff98edc6ca9ad728dbfe

Observation 32e827f5-ae9e-4eca-b389-10c40f94d5cd · outbound

This paper cites Branciard, Phys.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Branciard, Phys

Reference 12

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.617556Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.345477Z digest=sha256:cd8a077866887015447d0781e13968a4f1140e0ace9d045dcc3e65e4bf13ea7e

Observation 6bb81ffd-17ce-44ed-adde-072e9515026d · outbound

This paper cites Kochen and E.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Kochen and E

Reference 13

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.607285Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.349614Z digest=sha256:6fbe4d149dbdaf74bd097d5b27834e7bf0a0b33218a3e2053cf50c9077980432

Observation f2804ad4-e289-4625-82f3-4f736eddb47d · outbound

This paper cites Tavakoli, E.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Tavakoli, E

Reference 14

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.353638Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.353638Z digest=sha256:3fb48bc999da66adbf10b111b8a31ea312cefb525daf5565780c2206a8dd0822

Observation cd3335b5-169d-43ec-bef3-f0a4f2d92e43 · outbound

This paper cites Chaturvedi, M.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Chaturvedi, M

Reference 15

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.356742Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.356742Z digest=sha256:bef891dc73db711fe740b691b813bf59add826dfa89059257cd8ba5797a5a564

Observation 59da5e98-618a-41e0-bcc4-f1ff1473382c · outbound

This paper cites Manna, A.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Manna, A

Reference 16

Resolution
verified exact
doi, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.430469Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.359375Z digest=sha256:78b137cd693549dd227e3cff210a2094a461eaaed9e413aef9aeb4d22d3ab897

Observation 5801a875-c8a6-4797-b111-e9c486f4ed9c · outbound

This paper cites Limits of Classical correlations and Quantum advantages under (Anti-)Distinguishability constraints in Multipartite Communication.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Limits of Classical correlations and Quantum advantages under (Anti-)Distinguishability constraints in Multipartite Communication

Reference 17

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.362111Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.362111Z digest=sha256:afda684e72eb346035fc242b526ac1388b4f0b6a726c17447f93e675c8c27fa3

Observation 138066a2-6263-4a72-b3a3-04c925674a87 · outbound

This paper cites Oszmaniec, L.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Oszmaniec, L

Reference 18

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.584977Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.365228Z digest=sha256:6a1e0415b1e5eb4fa1b251481015c7d4eb3e2cbcf6dff4321a0ade1e7b2cdb21

Observation ca33dc85-c907-41cb-bd9e-d3988e77d171 · outbound

This paper cites Failure of epistemic models to explain the antidistinguishability of quantum mixed preparations.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Failure of epistemic models to explain the antidistinguishability of quantum mixed preparations

Reference 19

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.367989Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.367989Z digest=sha256:f0ed027b660609f5c0ed97ccc242d933d24f865667b60293eef9cef467b3db53

Observation ea2c1036-d0b2-4f3d-a03a-65870a5943c6 · outbound

This paper cites Session 7: The wave-functionψ: ontic vs epistemic debate,.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Session 7: The wave-functionψ: ontic vs epistemic debate,

Reference 20

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.574753Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.371182Z digest=sha256:0e155e356372be6f98394f9c07971fd843da3e93f64b9610bc1a7155418084f3

Observation ee7c7606-c611-42c6-8969-63b0b5639a5a · outbound

This paper cites No-go theorems,.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits No-go theorems,

Reference 21

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.564362Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.373981Z digest=sha256:5df48fe6bf89292a8bbc5fcf5c95c74b8d2f75aba1056c26f09886667aecb857

Observation 3ac65b23-3ba6-4907-981f-741ba294978f · outbound

This paper cites Chaturvedi and D.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Chaturvedi and D

Reference 22

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.376776Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.376776Z digest=sha256:125c9ceb7dfd7b85138c086f73e581691a29870d270e825b7ee498b616cd236d

Observation 5fa5c78c-c219-493f-a077-72e25efa5332 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Unresolved cited work

Reference 23

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.379992Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.379992Z digest=sha256:4a6ac41170e315ea7fef85c438ccc28b35c67656b3b467359251cf55e336a89d

Observation 4f63bb9c-029b-4739-84c1-18916cee202f · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Unresolved cited work

Reference 24

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.540734Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.382866Z digest=sha256:579f9bfbde8d2835af58231e3ef83a2126dbcb09d9923b0366efcffa6fddeb0e

Observation 4c4aeb17-9c99-457a-a1a9-64b07c0ad166 · outbound

This paper cites How statistical are quantum states?.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits How statistical are quantum states?

Reference 25

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.445234Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.386204Z digest=sha256:ac95d76faa6cda5f6983bf5ece85eb284d764c2628c2f9eb39bb822d7bde4e0f

Observation 40038ae9-c92d-4067-8052-4a92fb60cc9c · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Unresolved cited work

Reference 26

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.389469Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.389469Z digest=sha256:6f5fe247ecc4d6ded00ec90f2252e871fa0b1328a58675deba20c032df259410

Observation 33d17f0f-5838-41fa-82ed-2c6e85ae23b7 · outbound

This paper cites Colbeck and R.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Colbeck and R

Reference 27

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.523192Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.392230Z digest=sha256:70137f9619eb4ee9f40eba904226048cb3ac9db1867f866600ac09c9f0d53b7d

Observation 1b6f9b63-c290-4d32-aab4-11c9d0d13135 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Unresolved cited work

Reference 28

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.511572Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.395383Z digest=sha256:1f9f347877e4201333f77d3785f27d5bc5c270939436921ab9ec13c7f1638744

Observation 53752055-53e7-498c-a501-7c2e086e9a83 · outbound

This paper cites For any given Hilbert space dimension, (34) and (35) give a direct way to lower boundB Q(α,β)via an alter- nating SDP.

Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits For any given Hilbert space dimension, (34) and (35) give a direct way to lower boundB Q(α,β)via an alter- nating SDP

Reference 29

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.501573Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-15T16:09:44.399157Z digest=sha256:9067b8a9d56ea04b2d7b27be1f2ef7e80e706fc1ce6a2242e43807a69982a1c8

Pith citing papers

Observation f7c4f996-b42e-42e7-ab6e-78050cf20682 · inbound

Nonlocality without entanglement in exclusion of quantum states cites this paper.

Nonlocality without entanglement in exclusion of quantum states Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits

Reference 40

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T23:02:00.127624Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-02T23:02:00.127624Z digest=sha256:3a52decafed1f0fe377c852f7b6922875e51ba8037eca7007c7c97b12836de5f

Observation 3993404a-d23f-4076-ae24-6f266f83b07a · inbound

Semi-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution from Operational Assumptions cites this paper.

Semi-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution from Operational Assumptions Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits

Reference 84

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-07-10T23:37:44.701449Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-10T23:30:35.690766Z digest=sha256:e197dab1042d4a41ab61b558bfba19e001632b1bda6e5534c0b58202d4eac61f