Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Mixed state entanglement in deformed field theory at finite temperature

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In a deformed CFT at finite temperature, mixed-state entanglement drops as the deformation grows.

desk verdict New EWCS/HEN computations in a cutoff AdS black brane, but the intermediate-temperature derivation is invalid and the paper contradicts itself on the sign of the deformation effect. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.19680 v2 pith:O32WXJGE submitted 2024-12-27 hep-th

Sanjay Pant , Himanshu Parihar This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords TTbardeformationentanglementofpurificationwedgecrosssectionholographicnegativityfinitetemperaturecutoffAdSmixedstate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that in a higher-dimensional conformal field theory deformed by a stress-tensor-squared operator (a generalization of the $T\bar T$ deformation) and held at finite temperature, the entanglement between mixed subsystems decreases when the deformation parameter is increased, and that raising the temperature has the same qualitative effect. It reaches this conclusion by holography: the deformed theory is modeled by an anti-de Sitter black brane with a hard radial cutoff, and the paper computes the entanglement wedge cross section (the conjectured geometric dual of entanglement of purification) and the holographic entanglement negativity for strip-shaped subsystems. The calculations are analytic, covering small, intermediate, and large deformation crossed with low and intermediate temperature regimes, and they reduce to known finite-temperature results when the deformation is switched off. A careful reader should care because this gives concrete, testable predictions for how irrelevant deformations degrade quantum correlations in strongly coupled systems, and because it indicates that the cutoff geometry still supports a meaningful notion of mixed-state entanglement.

What carries the argument

The central object is the cutoff black-brane geometry: the metric (2.6) with blackening factor $f(z)=1 - z^d/z_h^d$, an AdS radius $R$, and a hard radial cutoff $z_c$, with the deformation parameter fixed by $\lambda = (4\pi G_N^{(d+1)}/(d R^{d-1})) z_c^d$. The computations work by extremizing the area functional (2.11) for codimension-two surfaces, obtaining the turning point $z_*$ of each subsystem as a series in the ratios $z_c/z_*$ and $z_*/z_h$, and then assembling those areas into two mixed-state measures: the EWCS, the minimal cross-section of the entanglement wedge connecting the two extremal-surface turning points, and the HEN, given for adjacent subsystems by $\frac{3}{4}(S(A_1)+S(A_2)-S(A_1\cup A_2))$ and for disjoint ones by the four-term combination (4.13). The machinery is perturbative: hypergeometric functions are expanded in the small ratios appropriate to each regime, turning geometric areas into analytic functions of subsystem widths $l$, separation $D$, temperature $T$, and deformation $\tilde\lambda$.

What would settle it

For two adjacent strips in the small-deformation, low-temperature regime, the paper predicts that all deformation corrections to the holographic negativity are negative and area-law; a direct replica or tensor-network computation of the logarithmic negativity in the deformed theory that finds any positive correction at order $z_c^d$ would refute the central monotonicity claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that, for a $T\bar T$-deformed CFT$_d$ at finite temperature whose holographic dual is an AdS$_{d+1}$ black brane with a finite radial cutoff $z_c$, both the entanglement wedge cross section $E_W$ and the holographic entanglement negativity $E$ for strip subsystems decrease monotonically as the deformation parameter $\tilde\lambda = \lambda^{1/d}$ increases. For $E_W$, the paper derives explicit expressions in the small-, intermediate-, and large-deformation limits combined with low- and intermediate-temperature limits, and finds that $E_W$ follows an area law and decreases with the cutoff $z_c$. For $E$, computed for two adjacent and two disjoint strips, every temperature and deformation correction contributes with a negative sign, and in the large-deformation limit the volume terms cancel so that the negativity is purely area-law. The paper interprets the similarity between deformation and temperature effects as a sign that both introduce additional degrees of freedom that mask quantum entanglement, and it treats the recovery of known finite-temperature results in the $z_c \to 0$ limit as a consistency check.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that cutting off the extra dimension at a finite radius faithfully models the deformed field theory, and that the holographic formulas for mixed-state entanglement continue to hold at that cutoff; one of those formulas, the entanglement-wedge cross-section as entanglement of purification, is admitted by the paper to be unproven.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, deforming a holographic CFT by a stress-tensor-squared operator steadily erodes both bipartite and mixed-state quantum correlations, mimicking the effect of raising temperature.
  • The area-law scaling of EWCS and HEN in all studied regimes means these mixed-state entanglement measures stay short-range even when the entanglement entropy itself becomes volume-law at high temperature or deformation.
  • In the large-deformation limit, the volume terms coming from the cutoff cancel in the negativity, leaving an area-law residue; strong deformation suppresses long-distance quantum entanglement without converting it into thermal-volume entanglement.
  • The zero-deformation limits reproduce known finite-temperature results, so the predicted monotonic decrease is a smooth deformation of established holographic answers rather than a discontinuity at zero deformation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct quantum-information computation of entanglement negativity in a lattice model implementing a $T\bar T$-like flow would test whether the monotonic decrease survives outside the large-$N$ holographic limit.
  • Since the EWCS is also conjectured to be dual to reflected entropy and odd entanglement entropy, the same monotonicity would likely hold for those measures in the cutoff geometry, a claim the paper does not make.
  • The deformation-temperature similarity hints that a single dimensionless combination such as $\tilde\lambda T$ might organize the EWCS and HEN curves across regimes; checking this would be a cheap and concrete test.
  • The strip-subsystem assumption may matter: repeating the analysis for spherical or otherwise curved entangling surfaces would show whether the area-law and decrease-with-deformation statements are shape-dependent.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies the holographic entanglement wedge cross section (EWCS) and holographic entanglement negativity (HEN) for strip-like subsystems in a (d+1)-dimensional AdS black brane with a hard radial cutoff, interpreted as a higher-dimensional TTbar-like deformed CFT at finite temperature. The authors derive perturbative expressions for these mixed-state measures in various regimes of the deformation parameter and temperature, and claim that increasing deformation reduces both EWCS and HEN in a way qualitatively similar to increasing temperature. The paper also checks that several expressions reduce to known results in the zc→0 and T→0 limits.

Significance. If correct, the paper would provide a useful catalogue of mixed-state entanglement measures in deformed holographic CFTs and would support an area-law interpretation of EWCS and HEN at finite cutoff. The paper has genuine strengths: it clearly states the validity restrictions of the holographic setup, it performs several analytic consistency checks against known limits, and it organizes a large set of perturbative computations into a readable regime-by-regime structure. However, the central monotonicity claim is not currently established: the intermediate-temperature EWCS derivation rests on an invalid replacement of a convergent series by a logarithm, and the paper contains directly contradictory sign statements about the effect of deformation on EWCS and on HEN. Because these contradictions touch the abstract's main claim, the manuscript needs substantive revision before the results can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [3.1.2] The step from Eq. (3.12) to Eqs. (3.13)-(3.16) is invalid. The kth term in Eq. (3.12) behaves as Gamma(k+1/2)/(Gamma(1/2)Gamma(k+1)) times 1/(kd-d+2) times (z2/zh)^{kd}, and since Gamma(k+1/2)/Gamma(k+1) ~ k^{-1/2}, the series is absolutely convergent even as z2/zh→1. The statement that the term is 'not convergent for large value of k' is therefore false. Replacing it by sum_k (1/k)(z2/zh)^{kd} = -ln(1-(z2/zh)^d) silently drops the Gamma prefactor and the denominator (kd-d+2), changing both the finite value of the series at z2=zh and its near-horizon asymptotics. No large-k asymptotic justification or error bound is supplied. Consequently Eqs. (3.14)-(3.16), the logarithmic term -ln(epsilon_d d) in Eq. (3.17), and the claim in Section 3.1.2 that increasing cutoff decreases EWCS do not follow from Eq. (3.6). This is load-bearing because the intermediate-temperature regime is one of the main regimes supporting the paper's central monotonicity claim.
  2. [3.1.1] Immediately after Eq. (3.8), the text states that 'by increasing the deformation at constant finite temperature the EWCS increases.' This directly contradicts the abstract, Section 5, and the statements in Sections 3.1.2, 3.2, and 3.3 that deformation decreases EWCS. Since the sign of dEW/dzc is the central physical claim of the paper, this contradiction must be resolved: either the author should prove the sign from Eq. (3.8) or remove the contradictory sentence and adjust the surrounding interpretation.
  3. [4.1.1] The sign statements around Eq. (4.8) are inconsistent with the definitions in Appendix A. For adjacent subsystems, F_adj_{2d-2} = zc^d (1/l1^{2d-2} + 1/l2^{2d-2} - 1/(l1+l2)^{2d-2}) is positive, and the coefficient a2 in Eq. (A.1) is also positive. Thus the first-order deformation correction at zero temperature is positive, not negative as stated in the sentence following Eq. (4.8). Since this sign is used to conclude that deformation reduces HEN, the monotonicity claim for adjacent subsystems in the small-deformation, low-temperature, zero-temperature limit is not supported as written; the coefficient, the definition, or the conclusion needs to be corrected.
minor comments (4)
  1. [1] Line 4 of the introduction contains the typo 'quantum field theories (QFRTs)'; this should be 'QFTs'.
  2. [3.1.2] In Eq. (3.16) the hypergeometric function has third argument d(k+3)-2 over 2(d-2), whereas the analogous expression in Eq. (2.21) has d(k+3)-2 over 2(d-1). If this is not a typo, the difference should be explained; otherwise it should be corrected.
  3. [3.1.2] In Eqs. (3.12)-(3.14) the summation index k, the truncation order of the z1-dependent terms, and the allowed range of the dimension d are not stated. In particular, the denominator kd-d+2 changes sign for small d and k, so the domain of validity of the series should be specified.
  4. [3.1.1] After Eq. (3.18) the text says the zc→0 limit reduces to the AdS black brane result 'up to some terms as obtained in [96]' without specifying which terms. The matching would be easier to verify if the precise relation to Ref. [96] were stated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the monotonicity claims are explicit consequences of standard holographic prescriptions applied to [95]'s HEE; the self-citation [37] is a computational input but is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The EWCS is obtained by direct integration (Eqs. (3.4)-(3.6)) over the cutoff black-brane metric, with the turning points z1 and z2 inserted from the independent HEE analysis of [95] (Ebrahim and Ahmadpour, not the present authors). The HEN is obtained by substituting the same HEE expressions into the standard algebraic proposals (4.4) and (4.13). No parameter is fitted to the target monotonicity; zc (deformation) and zh (temperature) are independent inputs, and the conclusion that EWCS and HEN decrease with zc is a sign/structure statement in the resulting explicit series. Consistency checks at zc -> 0 (Eqs. (3.18), (4.7), (4.10), (4.16)) reproduce earlier independent results, so the central claim is not defined by its inputs. Parihar appears as coauthor on [37], whose disjoint-subsystem HEN formula is used directly, and on [44,45,98]; but these are cited as published proposals and are not the sole support for the paper's claim. The paper itself flags the EWCS-EoP conjecture as unproved ('a direct proof of this duality has yet to be established'), which is a limitation rather than a circular step. Separately, the Sec. 3.1.2 replacement of the convergent series (3.12) by -ln[...] in (3.13)-(3.16) is mathematically uncontrolled and is a serious correctness risk for the intermediate-temperature branch; I do not count it as circularity because it is an approximation error, not an equivalence between input and output. Score 2 reflects only the minor, non-load-bearing self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All free parameters of the model (deformation parameter lambda, temperature T, subsystem sizes) are inputs from the prior duality and geometry; no new parameter is fitted to the target observables. The paper introduces no new entities. The main axioms are the holographic dictionary for TTbar deformation as a finite cutoff, and the conjectured holographic prescriptions for EWCS and HEN.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The holographic bulk dual of a TTbar-deformed CFT_d is AdS_{d+1} with a hard radial cutoff at z = z_c, with the deformation parameter related to the cutoff by lambda = 4 pi G_N / (d R^{d-1}) z_c^d (eq. 2.5).
    Invoked in Section 2.1 as the starting point of the computation; inherited from refs. [50,91,92] and not independently derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption The Ryu-Takayanagi formula for holographic entanglement entropy, S(A) = Area(gamma_A)/(4 G_N), remains valid in the cutoff geometry (eq. 2.9).
    Used throughout Sections 3 and 4 to relate HEN to areas of RT surfaces; standard in the holographic literature but still a conjectured duality for general states.
  • domain assumption The entanglement wedge cross section is the holographic dual of the entanglement of purification (eqs. 3.1 and 3.4).
    The paper itself notes in the Introduction that 'a direct proof of this duality has yet to be established'. The entire EWCS computation rests on this conjecture.
  • domain assumption The holographic entanglement negativity prescriptions of [35] for adjacent subsystems (eq. 4.4) and [37] for disjoint subsystems (eq. 4.13) are valid in the cutoff AdS black brane background.
    These proposals are themselves conjectural (they are not proven from first principles), and the paper applies them without modification to the cutoff geometry.
  • domain assumption The perturbative turning-point expansions for z* given in eqs. (2.15), (2.19), and (2.21) from ref. [95] are accurate in the stated regimes.
    These expansions are imported from prior work and are the backbone of all subsequent EWCS and HEN formulas; the paper does not re-derive or verify them.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mixed state entanglement in deformed field theory at finite temperature." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O32WXJGE

@misc{pith2026241219680,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mixed state entanglement in deformed field theory at finite temperature},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O32WXJGE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.19680}
}
abstract

We study mixed state entanglement measures in a higher dimensional $T\bar{T}$ deformed field theory at finite temperature. The holographic dual is described by AdS$_{d+1}$ black brane geometry with a finite cutoff. We compute the entanglement wedge cross section (EWCS), proposed to be dual to entanglement of purification (EoP) and holographic entanglement negativity (HEN) for strip like subsystems. The behavior of EWCS and HEN is studied across different regimes of temperature and deformation parameter. It is observed that the deformation and temperature exhibit similar effects on these two entanglement measures. Increasing the deformation leads to a decrease in the entanglement between the subsystems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.19680 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: disconnected entanglement wedge corresponding to A and B with vanishing EWCS. Right: connected entanglement wedge of A and B with nonzero EWCS. The minimization is taken over all ψ and all possible choices of partitioning A¯B¯. SρAA¯ is the von Neumann entropy and corresponds to the reduced density matrix ρAA¯ which can be obtained via tracing the BB¯ part from |ψ⟩ ⟨ψ|. Thus, the EoP is the minimum entanglemen… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Constraints from Entanglement Wedge Nesting for Holography at a Finite Cutoff

    hep-th 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For holography with a finite ETW-brane cutoff, entanglement wedge nesting requires the two intervals' RT surfaces to be spacelike separated, a condition stronger than spacelike separation of the intervals themselves.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [95]

    Ebrahim and M

    H. Ebrahim and M. Ahmadpour,Holographic entanglement entropy and mutual information in deformed field theories at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 086010 [2301.07242]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [1]

    Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv

    J.M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2 (1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

    arXiv 1998

  3. [2]

    Terhal, M

    B.M. Terhal, M. Horodecki, D.W. Leung and D.P. DiVincenzo,The entanglement of purification, J. Math. Phys.43 (2002) 4286 [quant-ph/0202044]

    arXiv 2002

  4. [3]

    Vidal and R.F

    G. Vidal and R.F. Werner,Computable measure of entanglement, Phys. Rev. A65 (2002) 032314 [quant-ph/0102117]

    arXiv 2002

  5. [4]

    Plenio,Logarithmic Negativity: A Full Entanglement Monotone That is not Convex, Phys

    M.B. Plenio,Logarithmic Negativity: A Full Entanglement Monotone That is not Convex, Phys. Rev. Lett.95 (2005) 090503 [quant-ph/0505071]

    arXiv 2005

  6. [5]

    Dutta and T

    S. Dutta and T. Faulkner,A canonical purification for the entanglement wedge cross-section, JHEP 03 (2021) 178 [1905.00577]

    arXiv 2021

  7. [6]

    Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv

    E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

    arXiv 1998

  8. [7]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett.96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001]

    arXiv 2006

Show all 110 references
  1. [8]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy, JHEP 08 (2006) 045 [hep-th/0605073]

    2006 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Hubeny, M

    V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi,A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062 [0705.0016]

    2007 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Faulkner,The Entanglement Renyi Entropies of Disjoint Intervals in AdS/CFT, 1303.7221

    T. Faulkner,The Entanglement Renyi Entropies of Disjoint Intervals in AdS/CFT, 1303.7221. 27

    arXiv

  4. [11]

    Lewkowycz and J

    A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena,Generalized gravitational entropy, JHEP 08 (2013) 090 [1304.4926]

    2013 arXiv

  5. [12]

    X. Dong, A. Lewkowycz and M. Rangamani,Deriving covariant holographic entanglement, JHEP 11 (2016) 028 [1607.07506]

    2016 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Fradkin and J.E

    E. Fradkin and J.E. Moore,Entanglement entropy of 2D conformal quantum critical points: hearing the shape of a quantum drum, Phys. Rev. Lett.97 (2006) 050404 [cond-mat/0605683]

    2006 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Nishioka, S

    T. Nishioka, S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Holographic Entanglement Entropy: An Overview, J. Phys. A42 (2009) 504008 [0905.0932]

    2009 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Takayanagi,Entanglement Entropy from a Holographic Viewpoint, Class

    T. Takayanagi,Entanglement Entropy from a Holographic Viewpoint, Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 153001 [1204.2450]

    2012 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Fischler and S

    W. Fischler and S. Kundu,Strongly Coupled Gauge Theories: High and Low Temperature Behavior of Non-local Observables, JHEP 05 (2013) 098 [1212.2643]

    2013 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Fischler, A

    W. Fischler, A. Kundu and S. Kundu,Holographic Mutual Information at Finite Temperature, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 126012 [1212.4764]

    2013 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Blanco, H

    D.D. Blanco, H. Casini, L.-Y. Hung and R.C. Myers,Relative Entropy and Holography, JHEP 08 (2013) 060 [1305.3182]

    2013 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Chaturvedi, V

    P. Chaturvedi, V. Malvimat and G. Sengupta,Entanglement thermodynamics for charged black holes, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 066004 [1601.00303]

    2016 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Barbosa, S

    S. Barbosa, S. Fichet, E. Megias and M. Quiros,Entanglement and Thermal Transitions from Singularities, 2406.02899

    arXiv

  14. [21]

    Takayanagi and K

    T. Takayanagi and K. Umemoto,Entanglement of purification through holographic duality, Nature Phys.14 (2018) 573 [1708.09393]

    2018 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Nguyen, T

    P. Nguyen, T. Devakul, M.G. Halbasch, M.P. Zaletel and B. Swingle,Entanglement of purification: from spin chains to holography, JHEP 01 (2018) 098 [1709.07424]

    2018 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Tamaoka,Entanglement Wedge Cross Section from the Dual Density Matrix, Phys

    K. Tamaoka,Entanglement Wedge Cross Section from the Dual Density Matrix, Phys. Rev. Lett.122 (2019) 141601 [1809.09109]

    2019 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Chaturvedi, V

    P. Chaturvedi, V. Malvimat and G. Sengupta,Holographic Quantum Entanglement Negativity, JHEP 05 (2018) 172 [1609.06609]

    2018 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Chaturvedi, V

    P. Chaturvedi, V. Malvimat and G. Sengupta,Covariant holographic entanglement negativity, Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) 776 [1611.00593]

    2018 arXiv

  19. [26]

    P. Jain, V. Malvimat, S. Mondal and G. Sengupta,Holographic entanglement negativity conjecture for adjacent intervals inAdS3/CF T2, Phys. Lett. B793 (2019) 104 [1707.08293]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [27]

    P. Jain, V. Malvimat, S. Mondal and G. Sengupta,Covariant holographic entanglement negativity for adjacent subsystems in AdS3 /CFT2, Nucl. Phys. B945 (2019) 114683 [1710.06138]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Malvimat, S

    V. Malvimat, S. Mondal, B. Paul and G. Sengupta,Holographic entanglement negativity for disjoint intervals inAdS3/CF T2, Eur. Phys. J. C79 (2019) 191 [1810.08015]. 28

    2019 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Malvimat, S

    V. Malvimat, S. Mondal, B. Paul and G. Sengupta,Covariant holographic entanglement negativity for disjoint intervals inAdS3/CF T2, Eur. Phys. J. C79 (2019) 514 [1812.03117]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Calabrese, J

    P. Calabrese, J. Cardy and E. Tonni,Entanglement negativity in quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.109 (2012) 130502 [1206.3092]

    2012 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Calabrese, J

    P. Calabrese, J. Cardy and E. Tonni,Entanglement negativity in extended systems: A field theoretical approach, J. Stat. Mech.1302 (2013) P02008 [1210.5359]

    2013 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Calabrese, J

    P. Calabrese, J. Cardy and E. Tonni,Finite temperature entanglement negativity in conformal field theory, J. Phys. A48 (2015) 015006 [1408.3043]

    2015 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Malvimat and G

    V. Malvimat and G. Sengupta,Entanglement negativity at large central charge, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 106003 [1712.02288]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Chaturvedi, V

    P. Chaturvedi, V. Malvimat and G. Sengupta,Entanglement negativity, Holography and Black holes, Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) 499 [1602.01147]

    2018 arXiv

  28. [35]

    P. Jain, V. Malvimat, S. Mondal and G. Sengupta,Holographic entanglement negativity for adjacent subsystems in AdSd+1/CFTd, Eur. Phys. J. Plus133 (2018) 300 [1708.00612]

    2018 arXiv

  29. [36]

    P. Jain, V. Malvimat, S. Mondal and G. Sengupta,Holographic Entanglement Negativity for Conformal Field Theories with a Conserved Charge, Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) 908 [1804.09078]

    2018 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Kumar Basak, H

    J. Kumar Basak, H. Parihar, B. Paul and G. Sengupta,Holographic entanglement negativity for disjoint subsystems in AdSd+1/CFTd, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39 (2024) 2450140 [2001.10534]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Mondal, B

    S. Mondal, B. Paul, G. Sengupta and P. Sharma,Holographic entanglement negativity for a single subsystem in conformal field theories with a conserved charge, J. Phys. A56 (2023) 425402 [2102.05848]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Afrasiar, J

    M. Afrasiar, J. Kumar Basak, V. Raj and G. Sengupta,Holographic Entanglement Negativity for Disjoint Subsystems in Conformal Field Theories with a Conserved Charge, 2106.14918

    arXiv

  33. [40]

    Kumar Basak, D

    J. Kumar Basak, D. Basu, V. Malvimat, H. Parihar and G. Sengupta,Islands for entanglement negativity, SciPost Phys.12 (2022) 003 [2012.03983]

    2022 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Dong, X.-L

    X. Dong, X.-L. Qi and M. Walter,Holographic entanglement negativity and replica symmetry breaking, JHEP 06 (2021) 024 [2101.11029]

    2021 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Kudler-Flam and S

    J. Kudler-Flam and S. Ryu,Entanglement negativity and minimal entanglement wedge cross sections in holographic theories, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 106014 [1808.00446]

    2019 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Kusuki, J

    Y. Kusuki, J. Kudler-Flam and S. Ryu,Derivation of holographic negativity in AdS3/CFT2, Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (2019) 131603 [1907.07824]

    2019 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Kumar Basak, V

    J. Kumar Basak, V. Malvimat, H. Parihar, B. Paul and G. Sengupta,On Minimal Entanglement Wedge Cross Section for Holographic Entanglement Negativity, Universe 10 (2024) 125 [2002.10272]

    2024 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Kumar Basak, H

    J. Kumar Basak, H. Parihar, B. Paul and G. Sengupta,Covariant holographic negativity from the entanglement wedge in AdS3/CFT2, Phys. Lett. B834 (2022) 137451 [2102.05676]. 29

    2022 arXiv

  39. [46]

    X. Dong, J. Kudler-Flam and P. Rath,Entanglement Negativity and Replica Symmetry Breaking in General Holographic States, 2409.13009

    arXiv

  40. [47]

    Zamolodchikov,Expectation value of composite field T anti-T in two-dimensional quantum field theory, hep-th/0401146

    A.B. Zamolodchikov,Expectation value of composite field T anti-T in two-dimensional quantum field theory, hep-th/0401146

    arXiv

  41. [48]

    Smirnov and A.B

    F.A. Smirnov and A.B. Zamolodchikov,On space of integrable quantum field theories, Nucl. Phys. B915 (2017) 363 [1608.05499]

    2017 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Cavaglià, S

    A. Cavaglià, S. Negro, I.M. Szécsényi and R. Tateo,T ¯T-deformed 2D Quantum Field Theories, JHEP 10 (2016) 112 [1608.05534]

    2016 arXiv

  43. [50]

    McGough, M

    L. McGough, M. Mezei and H. Verlinde,Moving the CFT into the bulk withT T, JHEP 04 (2018) 010 [1611.03470]

    2018 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Guica,An integrable Lorentz-breaking deformation of two-dimensional CFTs, SciPost Phys

    M. Guica,An integrable Lorentz-breaking deformation of two-dimensional CFTs, SciPost Phys. 5 (2018) 048 [1710.08415]

    2018 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Aharony, S

    O. Aharony, S. Datta, A. Giveon, Y. Jiang and D. Kutasov,Modular covariance and uniqueness of J ¯T deformed CFTs, JHEP 01 (2019) 085 [1808.08978]

    2019 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Nakayama,Very SpecialT ¯J deformed CFT, Phys

    Y. Nakayama,Very SpecialT ¯J deformed CFT, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 085008 [1811.02173]

    2019 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Cardy,T T deformations of non-Lorentz invariant field theories, 1809.07849

    J. Cardy,T T deformations of non-Lorentz invariant field theories, 1809.07849

    arXiv

  48. [55]

    B. Chen, J. Hou and J. Tian,Note on the nonrelativisticT T deformation, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 025004 [2012.14091]

    2021 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Asrat, A

    M. Asrat, A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki and D. Kutasov,Holography Beyond AdS, Nucl. Phys. B 932 (2018) 241 [1711.02690]

    2018 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Shyam,Background independent holographic dual toT ¯T deformed CFT with large central charge in 2 dimensions, JHEP 10 (2017) 108 [1707.08118]

    V. Shyam,Background independent holographic dual toT ¯T deformed CFT with large central charge in 2 dimensions, JHEP 10 (2017) 108 [1707.08118]

    2017 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Kraus, J

    P. Kraus, J. Liu and D. Marolf,Cutoff AdS3 versus the T T deformation, JHEP 07 (2018) 027 [1801.02714]

    2018 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Cottrell and A

    W. Cottrell and A. Hashimoto,Comments on T ¯T double trace deformations and boundary conditions, Phys. Lett. B789 (2019) 251 [1801.09708]

    2019 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Shyam,Finite Cutoff AdS5 Holography and the Generalized Gradient Flow, JHEP 12 (2018) 086 [1808.07760]

    V. Shyam,Finite Cutoff AdS5 Holography and the Generalized Gradient Flow, JHEP 12 (2018) 086 [1808.07760]

    2018 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Caputa, S

    P. Caputa, S. Datta and V. Shyam,Sphere partition functions \& cut-off AdS, JHEP 05 (2019) 112 [1902.10893]

    2019 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Giveon, N

    A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki and D. Kutasov,A solvable irrelevant deformation of AdS3/CFT2, JHEP 12 (2017) 155 [1707.05800]

    2017 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Coleman and V

    E. Coleman and V. Shyam,Conformal boundary conditions from cutoff AdS3, JHEP 09 (2021) 079 [2010.08504]

    2021 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Jiang,A pedagogical review on solvable irrelevant deformations of 2D quantum field theory, Commun

    Y. Jiang,A pedagogical review on solvable irrelevant deformations of 2D quantum field theory, Commun. Theor. Phys.73 (2021) 057201 [1904.13376]

    2021 arXiv

  58. [65]

    S. He, Y. Sun and Y.-X. Zhang,T T-flow effects on torus partition functions, JHEP 09 (2021) 061 [2011.02902]. 30

    2021 arXiv

  59. [66]

    He,Note on higher-point correlation functions of theT ¯T or J ¯T deformed CFTs, Sci

    S. He,Note on higher-point correlation functions of theT ¯T or J ¯T deformed CFTs, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.64 (2021) 291011 [2012.06202]

    2021 arXiv

  60. [67]

    He and Y

    S. He and Y. Sun,Correlation functions of CFTs on a torus with aT T deformation, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 026023 [2004.07486]

    2020 arXiv

  61. [68]

    He and Y.-Z

    S. He and Y.-Z. Li,Genus two correlation functions in CFTs withT ¯T deformation, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.66 (2023) 251011 [2202.04810]

    2023 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Tian,On-shell action of T¯T-deformed Holographic CFTs, 2306.01258

    J. Tian,On-shell action of T¯T-deformed Holographic CFTs, 2306.01258

    arXiv

  63. [70]

    A. Dei, B. Knighton, K. Naderi and S. Sethi,Tensionless AdS3/CFT2 and single trace T T, JHEP 11 (2024) 145 [2408.00823]

    2024 arXiv

  64. [71]

    J. Tian, T. Lai and F. Omidi,Modular transformations of on-shell actions of (root-)T ¯T deformed holographic CFTs, Nucl. Phys. B1007 (2024) 116675 [2404.16354]

    2024 arXiv

  65. [72]

    Donnelly and V

    W. Donnelly and V. Shyam,Entanglement entropy andT T deformation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 131602 [1806.07444]

    2018 arXiv

  66. [73]

    Lewkowycz, J

    A. Lewkowycz, J. Liu, E. Silverstein and G. Torroba,T T and EE, with implications for (A)dS subregion encodings, JHEP 04 (2020) 152 [1909.13808]

    2020

  67. [74]

    B. Chen, L. Chen and P.-X. Hao,Entanglement entropy inT T-deformed CFT, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 086025 [1807.08293]

    2018 arXiv

  68. [75]

    Banerjee, A

    A. Banerjee, A. Bhattacharyya and S. Chakraborty,Entanglement Entropy forT T deformed CFT in general dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B948 (2019) 114775 [1904.00716]

    2019 arXiv

  69. [76]

    Jeong, K.-Y

    H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim and M. Nishida,Entanglement and Rényi entropy of multiple intervals in T T-deformed CFT and holography, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 106015 [1906.03894]

    2019 arXiv

  70. [77]

    Murdia, Y

    C. Murdia, Y. Nomura, P. Rath and N. Salzetta,Comments on holographic entanglement entropy in T Tdeformed conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 026011 [1904.04408]

    2019 arXiv

  71. [78]

    Park,Holographic Entanglement Entropy in Cutoff AdS, Int

    C. Park,Holographic Entanglement Entropy in Cutoff AdS, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A33 (2019) 1850226 [1812.00545]

    2019 arXiv

  72. [79]

    Asrat,Entropic c–functions in T ¯T , J¯T , T¯J deformations, Nucl

    M. Asrat,Entropic c–functions in T ¯T , J¯T , T¯J deformations, Nucl. Phys. B960 (2020) 115186 [1911.04618]

    2020 arXiv

  73. [80]

    He and H

    S. He and H. Shu,Correlation functions, entanglement and chaos in the T T /JT-deformed CFTs, JHEP 02 (2020) 088 [1907.12603]

    2020 arXiv

  74. [81]

    Grieninger,Entanglement entropy andT T deformations beyond antipodal points from holography, JHEP 11 (2019) 171 [1908.10372]

    S. Grieninger,Entanglement entropy andT T deformations beyond antipodal points from holography, JHEP 11 (2019) 171 [1908.10372]

    2019 arXiv

  75. [82]

    Grieninger, K

    S. Grieninger, K. Ikeda and D.E. Kharzeev,Temporal entanglement entropy as a probe of renormalization group flow, JHEP 05 (2024) 030 [2312.08534]

    2024 arXiv

  76. [83]

    Banerjee and P

    A. Banerjee and P. Roy,Bounds on T T deformation from entanglement, JHEP 10 (2024) 064 [2404.16946]

    2024 arXiv

  77. [84]

    Asrat and J

    M. Asrat and J. Kudler-Flam,T ¯T, the entanglement wedge cross section, and the breakdown of the split property, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 045009 [2005.08972]. 31

    2020 arXiv

  78. [85]

    Basu, Lavish and B

    D. Basu, Lavish and B. Paul,Entanglement negativity in TT¯-deformed CFT2s, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 126026 [2302.11435]

    2023

  79. [86]

    D. Basu, S. Biswas, A. Dey, B. Paul and G. Sengupta,Odd entanglement entropy in TT¯ deformed CFT2s and holography, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 126013 [2307.04832]

    2023 arXiv

  80. [87]

    Basu and V

    D. Basu and V. Raj,Reflected entropy and timelike entanglement in TT¯-deformed CFT2s, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 046009 [2402.07253]

    2024 arXiv

  81. [88]

    Chang, S

    J.-C. Chang, S. He, Y.-X. Liu and L. Zhao,The holographic T ¯T deformation of the entanglement entropy in (A)dS3/CFT2, 2409.08198

    arXiv

  82. [89]

    Basu and S

    D. Basu and S. Biswas,Entanglement, T¯T and rotating black holes, 2410.06363

    arXiv

  83. [90]

    D. Basu, H. Chourasiya, A. Dey and V. Raj,Bridging Boundaries: T ¯T, Double Holography, and Reflected Entropy, 2411.12827

    arXiv

  84. [91]

    Taylor,T ¯T deformations in general dimensions, Adv

    M. Taylor,T ¯T deformations in general dimensions, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.27 (2023) 37 [1805.10287]

    2023 arXiv

  85. [92]

    Hartman, J

    T. Hartman, J. Kruthoff, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini,Holography at finite cutoff with a T 2 deformation, JHEP 03 (2019) 004 [1807.11401]

    2019 arXiv

  86. [93]

    Khoeini-Moghaddam, F

    S. Khoeini-Moghaddam, F. Omidi and C. Paul,Aspects of Hyperscaling Violating Geometries at Finite Cutoff, JHEP 02 (2021) 121 [2011.00305]

    2021 arXiv

  87. [94]

    Jeong, W.-B

    H.-S. Jeong, W.-B. Pan, Y.-W. Sun and Y.-T. Wang,Holographic study ofT T like deformed HV QFTs: holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 02 (2023) 018 [2211.00518]

    2023 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Babaei Velni, M.R

    K. Babaei Velni, M.R. Mohammadi Mozaffar and M.H. Vahidinia,Some Aspects of Entanglement Wedge Cross-Section, JHEP 05 (2019) 200 [1903.08490]

    2019 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Jain and S

    P. Jain and S. Mahapatra,Mixed state entanglement measures as probe for confinement, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 126022 [2010.07702]

    2020 arXiv

  90. [98]

    D. Basu, H. Parihar, V. Raj and G. Sengupta,Entanglement negativity, reflected entropy, and anomalous gravitation, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 086013 [2202.00683]

    2022 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Jain, S.S

    P. Jain, S.S. Jena and S. Mahapatra,Holographic confining-deconfining gauge theories and entanglement measures with a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 086016 [2209.15355]

    2023 arXiv

  92. [100]

    P. Jain, N. Jokela, M. Jarvinen and S. Mahapatra,Bounding entanglement wedge cross sections, JHEP 03 (2023) 102 [2211.07671]

    2023 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Chakrabortty, S

    S. Chakrabortty, S. Pant and K. Sil,Effect of back reaction on entanglement and subregion volume complexity in strongly coupled plasma, JHEP 06 (2020) 061 [2004.06991]

    2020 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Karan and S

    D. Karan and S. Pant,Entanglement and Chaos near critical point in strongly coupled Gauge theory, Eur. Phys. J. C84 (2024) 113 [2308.00018]. 32

    2024 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Jiang, P

    X. Jiang, P. Wang, H. Wu and H. Yang,An alternative to purification in CFT, 2406.09033

    arXiv

  96. [104]

    Mori and B

    T. Mori and B. Yoshida,Does connected wedge imply distillable entanglement?, 2411.03426

  97. [105]

    Basak, V

    J.K. Basak, V. Malvimat and J. Yoon,A New Genuine Multipartite Entanglement Measure: from Qubits to Multiboundary Wormholes, 2411.11961

    arXiv

  98. [106]

    De Nobili, A

    C. De Nobili, A. Coser and E. Tonni,Entanglement negativity in a two dimensional harmonic lattice: Area law and corner contributions, J. Stat. Mech.1608 (2016) 083102 [1604.02609]

    2016 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Sherman, T

    N.E. Sherman, T. Devakul, M.B. Hastings and R.R.P. Singh,Nonzero-temperature entanglement negativity of quantum spin models: Area law, linked cluster expansions, and sudden death, Phys. Rev. E93 (2016) 022128

    2016

  100. [108]

    Chakrabortty, H

    S. Chakrabortty, H. Hoshino, S. Pant and K. Sil,A holographic study of the characteristics of chaos and correlation in the presence of backreaction, Phys. Lett. B838 (2023) 137749 [2206.12555]

    2023 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Jahnke,Delocalizing entanglement of anisotropic black branes, JHEP 01 (2018) 102 [1708.07243]

    V. Jahnke,Delocalizing entanglement of anisotropic black branes, JHEP 01 (2018) 102 [1708.07243]

    2018 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Sil,Pole skipping and chaos in anisotropic plasma: a holographic study, JHEP 03 (2021) 232 [2012.07710]

    K. Sil,Pole skipping and chaos in anisotropic plasma: a holographic study, JHEP 03 (2021) 232 [2012.07710]. 33

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.