Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

TAB: Unified Benchmarking of Time Series Anomaly Detection Methods

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.18046 v2 pith:O3FKHWY2 submitted 2025-06-22 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords methodstsadseriestimedatasetsanomalydetectionevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Time series anomaly detection (TSAD) plays an important role in many domains such as finance, transportation, and healthcare. With the ongoing instrumentation of reality, more time series data will be available, leading also to growing demands for TSAD. While many TSAD methods already exist, new and better methods are still desirable. However, effective progress hinges on the availability of reliable means of evaluating new methods and comparing them with existing methods. We address deficiencies in current evaluation procedures related to datasets and experimental settings and protocols. Specifically, we propose a new time series anomaly detection benchmark, called TAB. First, TAB encompasses 29 public multivariate datasets and 1,635 univariate time series from different domains to facilitate more comprehensive evaluations on diverse datasets. Second, TAB covers a variety of TSAD methods, including Non-learning, Machine learning, Deep learning, LLM-based, and Time-series pre-trained methods. Third, TAB features a unified and automated evaluation pipeline that enables fair and easy evaluation of TSAD methods. Finally, we employ TAB to evaluate existing TSAD methods and report on the outcomes, thereby offering a deeper insight into the performance of these methods. Besides, all datasets and code are available at https://github.com/decisionintelligence/TAB.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AnomSeer: Reinforcing Multimodal LLMs to Reason for Time-Series Anomaly Detection

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    New RL approach (TimerPO) with ground-truth-generated expert reasoning traces lets 3B-7B multimodal LLMs outperform GPT-4o on time-series anomaly detection and explanation.

  2. CLIR-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal Question Answering over Irregular Clinical Time Series

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CLIR-Bench shows generalist and time-series LLMs struggle to ground clinical answers in sparse irregular ICU evidence, with top accuracy near 50% and weak causal evidence use.

  3. LEFT: Learnable Fusion of Tri-view Tokens for Unsupervised Time Series Anomaly Detection

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LEFT detects time-series anomalies as violations of agreement among time, frequency, and multi-scale views, improving VUS-ROC/VUS-PR over prior methods with roughly 80% fewer FLOPs.

  4. CRISP-SAM2: SAM2 with Cross-Modal Interaction and Semantic Prompting for Multi-Organ Segmentation

    eess.IV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A text-guided SAM2 variant with cross-modal attention, semantic prompt generation, and a similarity-sorted memory bank achieves top Dice and surface scores on seven public multi-organ CT datasets.

Pith tools