REVIEW 4 cited by
TAB: Unified Benchmarking of Time Series Anomaly Detection Methods
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Time series anomaly detection (TSAD) plays an important role in many domains such as finance, transportation, and healthcare. With the ongoing instrumentation of reality, more time series data will be available, leading also to growing demands for TSAD. While many TSAD methods already exist, new and better methods are still desirable. However, effective progress hinges on the availability of reliable means of evaluating new methods and comparing them with existing methods. We address deficiencies in current evaluation procedures related to datasets and experimental settings and protocols. Specifically, we propose a new time series anomaly detection benchmark, called TAB. First, TAB encompasses 29 public multivariate datasets and 1,635 univariate time series from different domains to facilitate more comprehensive evaluations on diverse datasets. Second, TAB covers a variety of TSAD methods, including Non-learning, Machine learning, Deep learning, LLM-based, and Time-series pre-trained methods. Third, TAB features a unified and automated evaluation pipeline that enables fair and easy evaluation of TSAD methods. Finally, we employ TAB to evaluate existing TSAD methods and report on the outcomes, thereby offering a deeper insight into the performance of these methods. Besides, all datasets and code are available at https://github.com/decisionintelligence/TAB.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
AnomSeer: Reinforcing Multimodal LLMs to Reason for Time-Series Anomaly Detection
New RL approach (TimerPO) with ground-truth-generated expert reasoning traces lets 3B-7B multimodal LLMs outperform GPT-4o on time-series anomaly detection and explanation.
-
CLIR-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal Question Answering over Irregular Clinical Time Series
CLIR-Bench shows generalist and time-series LLMs struggle to ground clinical answers in sparse irregular ICU evidence, with top accuracy near 50% and weak causal evidence use.
-
LEFT: Learnable Fusion of Tri-view Tokens for Unsupervised Time Series Anomaly Detection
LEFT detects time-series anomalies as violations of agreement among time, frequency, and multi-scale views, improving VUS-ROC/VUS-PR over prior methods with roughly 80% fewer FLOPs.
-
CRISP-SAM2: SAM2 with Cross-Modal Interaction and Semantic Prompting for Multi-Organ Segmentation
A text-guided SAM2 variant with cross-modal attention, semantic prompt generation, and a similarity-sorted memory bank achieves top Dice and surface scores on seven public multi-organ CT datasets.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.