Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 131 references

Physics-Grounded Materials Artificial Intelligence for Reliable Materials Discovery

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Physics should enter materials AI as prior, descriptor, constraint, verifier, and infrastructure.

desk verdict A well-organized perspective that gives the field a useful vocabulary, but its central reliability claim is programmatic rather than demonstrated. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06680 v1 pith:O3ZCVF6B submitted 2026-08-07 physics.chem-ph

Yuhang Wang , Qian Wang , Seong-Hoon Jang , Hao Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-ph
keywords Physics-GroundedMaterialsAIDiscoveryAgentsAutonomousScientificResearchcatalysissolid-stateelectrolyteshydrogenstoragephysics-informedmachinelearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This Perspective argues that the next stage of materials discovery by AI should not be built on statistical correlation alone. It proposes PhysMat AI, a unifying framework in which physics enters at five distinct points—as prior knowledge, as descriptors, as constraints, as verifiers, and as data infrastructure—so that models predict, reason, and validate within physically feasible bounds. The authors demonstrate the framework through catalysis, solid-state electrolytes, and hydrogen storage, then lay out a roadmap from physics-aware to physics-reasoning to physics-autonomous AI. If the framework is right, reliable materials discovery becomes a matter of engineering the right physical interfaces around the model, not of chasing larger datasets alone.

What carries the argument

The organizing object is a five-layer taxonomy of physics roles in AI—prior, descriptor, constraint, verifier, and infrastructure—together with a closed-loop workflow connecting physical principles, curated databases, AI models and agents, prediction and screening, experimental validation, and feedback. This named 'physics as' architecture functions as a conceptual scaffold that assigns a physical role to every stage of materials discovery and lets AI agents invoke computational tools such as density-functional theory, microkinetic modeling, ab initio molecular dynamics, and metadynamics while reasoning. The taxonomy carries the argument: once the five roles are accepted, materials AI becomes an integration problem rather than only a modeling problem.

What would settle it

A head-to-head study in a new material family where a plain data-driven pipeline matches or beats a PhysMat AI-style pipeline in the fraction of experimentally validated working candidates, while also extrapolating better to out-of-distribution compositions, would refute the claim that physics grounding is necessary for reliable discovery. A systematic literature classification showing substantial physics-informed methods that fit none of the five roles would refute the taxonomy's completeness.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that purely data-driven materials AI fails at interpretability, extrapolation, and physical consistency, and that the remedy is a unified architecture in which physical knowledge is embedded throughout the discovery loop: as priors that constrain learning, as descriptors that give features mechanistic meaning, as constraints that restrict reasoning to feasible regions, as verifiers that check predictions with simulation and experiment, and as infrastructure that makes data traceable and condition-aware. On this view, physics is not auxiliary to AI but constitutive of it, transforming AI from an interpolative predictor into a mechanism-guided discovery system. The paper supports this with examples from catalysis, solid-state electrolytes, and hydrogen storage, including closed-loop workflows in which validated and failed results feed back into the model.

Load-bearing premise

The framework assumes that the five roles—prior, descriptor, constraint, verifier, and infrastructure—exhaustively cover the ways physics can enter materials AI, but the paper gives no completeness criterion or comparison with alternative partitionings.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Candidates that violate thermodynamic stability, kinetic accessibility, or operating-window constraints should be discarded before experimental testing even if they score well.
  • Materials databases should record measurement conditions, provenance, and negative and failed results as first-class information, not only successful property values.
  • AI agents should be judged by whether they invoke the right physical tool at the right time, not by prediction accuracy alone.
  • The same five-role structure transfers across application domains, so methods developed for catalysis can be repurposed for battery or hydrogen-storage discovery.
  • The end state is a self-improving closed-loop system in which AI, simulation, and experiment co-evolve into physics-autonomous discovery.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The five-role taxonomy can be used as an audit checklist: classifying a corpus of physics-informed materials machine-learning papers by these roles would test the claimed completeness and likely expose boundary cases such as uncertainty quantification and synthesis-aware search.
  • If the framework is adopted, database funding priorities would shift toward negative-result capture and condition-aware metadata, because infrastructure is one of the five load-bearing roles.
  • Head-to-head benchmarks between physics-free and physics-grounded pipelines on out-of-distribution materials would quantify how much reliability the physics actually buys, a quantity the paper does not compute.
  • The roadmap implies a natural graduation test: a system that proposes a material, validates it in silico and in the lab, and updates its own knowledge base would count as physics-autonomous AI.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. This Perspective proposes 'Physics-Grounded Materials AI' (PhysMat AI), a unifying framework in which physical knowledge enters materials AI through five roles: prior knowledge, descriptors, constraints, verifiers, and infrastructure. The authors illustrate each role with examples from electrocatalysis, solid-state electrolytes, and hydrogen storage, and they sketch a three-stage roadmap from physics-aware AI to physics-reasoning AI and ultimately physics-autonomous AI. The paper is explicitly programmatic: its aim is to organize existing work around a taxonomy and to motivate a closed-loop discovery workflow, not to introduce new data or models.

Significance. If taken as a programmatic Perspective, the paper makes a useful and timely contribution: it names a taxonomy that is easy to adopt, connects it to concrete databases and workflows (e.g., DigCat, DigBat/DDSE, DigHyd, DIVE), and is explicit about remaining obstacles. The figures and examples are drawn from real published results, and the discussion of failure feedback, provenance-aware data infrastructure, and physical verification is constructive. The main limitation is that the reliability and extrapolation claims are supported by illustrative case studies rather than by controlled comparisons; this weakens the evidential weight but does not invalidate a Perspective whose value lies in synthesis and agenda-setting.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2 / Section 3.1.1] The statements 'PhysMat AI ... enables reliable, interpretable, and verifiable materials discovery' (Section 2) and 'enhanced extrapolation capability beyond the available data' (Section 3.1.1) are stronger than what Section 4.2 can support when it lists weak extrapolation, physical inconsistency, and uncertainty quantification as 'major obstacles.' I suggest wording them as design goals or as capabilities that the framework is intended to provide, which would remove an apparent internal tension without weakening the proposal.
  2. [Section 2] The sentence 'Together, these five layers collectively span the full lifecycle of materials intelligence' asserts a completeness property, but the manuscript gives no criterion for completeness and does not discuss alternative taxonomies (for example, uncertainty quantification or synthesis-aware search could arguably be additional roles). Please either add a rationale for why these five roles are sufficient or soften 'collectively span' to 'provide a practical decomposition of.'
  3. [References] Reference [41] and reference [63] are the same paper (Witman et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2411763), as are references [38] and [61] (Hirscher et al., J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 827, 153548); these should be consolidated to avoid duplicate bibliography entries.
  4. [References] Reference [6] is attributed to 'J. Pablo'; this appears to be Juan de Pablo and should be spelled accordingly, and reference [101] gives 'Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2002, 9, 12562,' which should be volume 99.
  5. [Section 3.5.2] The text states that the initial DDSE release contained 678 performance records and that the current DigBat platform integrates 3725 experimental records, while Figure 7d is captioned 'updated to May 2023'; please clarify which of these numbers corresponds to Figure 7d so that the reader does not conflate the two versions.
  6. [Section 3.4.2] The 5% agreement between predicted and measured LiScO2 activity is a strong illustrative result, but because no unconstrained baseline is shown, the sentence 'confirming that experimental verification is essential' should be phrased as an interpretation rather than as a controlled demonstration.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the five-role framework is an organizing taxonomy illustrated with the authors' prior case studies; no prediction or derivation in this Perspective reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

This manuscript is a Perspective, not a derivation or a fitted-model paper. It proposes a five-layer taxonomy (Physics as Prior, Descriptor, Constraint, Verifier, Infrastructure) and illustrates each layer with published examples. The taxonomy is not defined in terms of a target quantity that is then 'predicted'; it is a classification scheme. The closest evidence pattern is the heavy use of the authors' own prior work (DigCat, DigBat/DDSE, DigHyd, DIVE, hydride SSE studies, the LiScO2 discovery, MgH2 models; refs [33, 36, 42, 65, 70, 99, 102, 112, 119] among others). However, these citations function as illustrative case studies selected to fit the five roles, not as a load-bearing theorem or as a fitted parameter renamed a prediction. The paper presents no equation in which an input is defined from an output; no 'uniqueness theorem' from the authors is invoked to forbid alternatives; and no ansatz is smuggled in through a self-citation. The claim that physics grounding 'enables reliable, interpretable, and verifiable materials discovery' (Section 2) is a perspective-level conjecture supported by examples and by independent external foundations (e.g., the Norskov computational hydrogen electrode, scaling relations, d-band theory, Materials Project, AFLOW, Open Catalyst). The paper itself concedes that 'weak extrapolation, physical inconsistency, uncertainty quantification, interpretability, and multiscale coupling remain major obstacles' (Section 4.2), which is a limitation on evidential force, not a marker of circularity. If one wanted to critique the paper, the right criticism is that no controlled comparison against unconstrained AI is provided within this manuscript; but that is a completeness or evidence concern, not one of the specific reduction patterns this pass is charged to detect. Because no derivation chain is present, there is no circular step to exhibit; the argument is a proposal whose support is illustrative rather than derivational.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted because the paper contains no quantitative model. The domain assumptions are the physical-reductionist premise and the claim of unreliability of pure data-driven AI; the paper-specific axiom is the completeness of the five roles.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Materials behavior is fundamentally governed by thermodynamics, kinetics, electronic structure, transport processes, and operating environments.
    Stated in the abstract and introduction; the whole framework rests on this reductionist premise.
  • domain assumption Purely data-driven AI lacks extrapolative reliability and physical consistency.
    Sections 1 and 3.3 assume this problem is inherent, motivating the framework.
  • ad hoc to paper The five roles (prior, descriptor, constraint, verifier, infrastructure) are complementary and complete enough to span the full AI workflow.
    Section 2: "Together, these five layers collectively span the full lifecycle of materials intelligence"; no derivation of completeness is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper AI agents can invoke computational tools (DFT, MKM, AIMD, MetaD) reliably enough to perform mechanism-guided reasoning.
    Section 3.3, Figure 5c; assumed for the physics-reasoning stage without a demonstration of reliability.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Physics-Grounded Materials Artificial Intelligence for Reliable Materials Discovery." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O3ZCVF6B

@misc{pith2026260806680,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Physics-Grounded Materials Artificial Intelligence for Reliable Materials Discovery},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O3ZCVF6B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06680}
}
read the original abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming materials discovery, yet conventional data-driven approaches often suffer from limited interpretability, poor extrapolation, and inconsistency with physical laws. Since materials behavior is fundamentally governed by thermodynamics, kinetics, electronic structure, transport processes, and operating environments, the next generation of materials intelligence must move beyond correlation-based prediction toward physics-grounded reasoning. In this Perspective, we systematically discuss Physics-Grounded Materials AI (PhysMat AI) as a unifying perspective for integrating physical knowledge into materials intelligence through five complementary roles: physics as prior knowledge, descriptors, constraints, verifiers, and infrastructure. Using representative examples from catalysis, solid-state electrolytes in solid-state battery, and hydrogen-storage materials, we illustrate how physical principles guide data representation, model reasoning, validation workflows, and knowledge management. We further present how AI agents can leverage these physics-aware components to perform mechanism-guided discovery within physically feasible search spaces. Finally, we outline a developmental roadmap from physics-aware AI to physics-reasoning AI and ultimately physics-autonomous AI. Looking forward, materials intelligence should evolve from predictive models toward autonomous scientific systems capable of integrating physical reasoning, multiscale simulations, experimental validation, and continuous knowledge updating for reliable materials discovery.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.06680 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overall closed-loop workflow of Physics-Grounded Materials AI (PhysMat AI). It describes a closed-loop materials-discovery workflow that integrates physical principles, curated databases, AI models and agents, prediction and screening, experimental validation, and continuous feedback. Physics provides the scientific foundation for data representation and model reasoning, while validated results are continuously fed … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. (a) Conceptual illustration of physics as descriptor in PhysMat AI. Catalysis: (b) Adsorption energies of O and OH on Pd and Pt skin alloys as a function of d band center. Reproduced with permission from ref.[68] copyright 2010, American Institute of Physics. (c) Activity volcano for ORR of M-pyrrole-N catalysts. Reproduced with permission from ref.[69] licensed under a Creative Commons License CC BY-NC 4.0. (d) Fea… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Conceptual illustration of physics as constraint in PhysMat AI. (a) Unconstrained AI may identify high-scoring candidates that violate fundamental physical principles. (b) Physics-based constraints, including thermodynamic stability, reaction kinetics, operando conditions, transport behavior, and uncertainty quantification, reduce the feasible search space and enforce physical consistency. (c) Emerging AI agents per… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Physics as Verifier in PhysMat AI. (a) A validation toolkit combining theoretical calculations, simulations, and experimental characterization. Subpanel for phase stability is reproduced with permission from ref.[93] licensed under a Creative Commons License CC BY-NC 4…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Physics as infrastructure in PhysMat AI. (a) A physical knowledge infrastructure built upon domain-specific databases and linked data resources. (b) Infrastructure services support AI models and agents through standardized, traceable, condition-aware, and multimodal da…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Challenges and roadmap of PhysMat AI. Key deployment, model, and data challenges facing PhysMat AI, together with a three-stage roadmap from physics-aware AI to physics-reasoning AI and ultimately physics-autonomous AI for reliable and autonomous materials discovery. 4…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

131 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Y. Li, S. Wang, J. Wang, L. Qian, J. Zhang, Chem. Rev. 2026, 126, 6776

    2026

  2. [2]

    Y. Wang, Q. Wang, S.-H. Jang, E. J. Cheng, H. Li, Chem. Commun. 2026, 62, 9536

    2026

  3. [3]

    Zhang, X

    D. Zhang, X. Jia, Y. Wang, H. Liu, Q. Wang, S.-H. Jang, D. Shah, S. Ye, H. B. Tran, H. Li, Chem. Sci. 2026, 17, 5782. 34

    2026

  4. [4]

    Zhang, Y

    D. Zhang, Y. Chen, C. Liu, Y. Liu, H. Xin, J. Peng, P. Ou, H. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2026, e26150

    2026

  5. [5]

    Y. Liu, M. Jovanovic, K. Mallayya, W. J. Maddox, A. G. Wilson, S. Klemenz, L. M. Schoop, E.- A. Kim, Communications Materials 2025, 6, 212

    2025

  6. [6]

    Pablo, N

    J. Pablo, N. E. Jackson, M. A. Webb, L.-Q. Chen, J. E. Moore, D. Morgan, R. Jacobs, T. Pollock, D. G. Schlom, E. S. Toberer, J. Analytis, I. Dabo, D. M. DeLongchamp, G. A. Fiete, G. M. Grason, G. Hautier, Y. Mo, K. Rajan, E. J. Reed, E. Rodriguez, V. Stevanovic, J. Suntivich, K. Thornton, J.-C. Zhao, npj Comput. Mater. 2019, 5, 41

    2019

  7. [7]

    Merchant, S

    A. Merchant, S. Batzner, S. S. Schoenholz, M. Aykol, G. Cheon, E. D. Cubuk, Nature 2023, 624, 80

    2023

  8. [8]

    Y. Ma, P. Xu, M. Li, X. Ji, W. Zhao, W. Lu, npj Comput. Mater. 2024, 10,141

    2024

Show all 131 references
  1. [9]

    A. K. Cheetham, R. Seshadri, Chem. Mater. 2024, 36, 3490

    2024

  2. [10]

    Ringe, N

    S. Ringe, N. G. Hormann, H. Oberhofer, K. Reuter, Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 10777

    2022

  3. [11]

    Scarpati, E

    G. Scarpati, E. Frasci, G. Di Ilio, E. Jannelli, J. Energy Storage 2024, 102, 113934

    2024

  4. [12]

    Y. Xiao, Y. Wang, S.-H. Bo, J. C. Kim, L. J. Miara, G. Ceder, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2019, 5, 105

    2019

  5. [13]

    Zhang, R

    B. Zhang, R. Tan, L. Yang, J. Zheng, K. Zhang, S. Mo, Z. Lin, F. Pan, Energy Storage Mater. 2018, 10, 139

    2018

  6. [14]

    Gupta, K

    V. Gupta, K. Choudhary, F. Tavazza, C. Campbell, W. K. Liao, A. Choudhary, A. Agrawal, Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6595

    2021

  7. [15]

    P. Xu, X. Ji, M. Li, W. Lu, npj Comput. Mater. 2023, 9, 42

    2023

  8. [16]

    Y. Wang, Y. Wang, H. Li, EES Catalysis 2026, 4, 837

    2026

  9. [17]

    Zhuang, X

    Y. Zhuang, X. Yang, C. Zhang, X. Jia, D. Zhang, M. Li, T. Yao, J. Peng, Z. Gao, W. Yang, H. Li, Precision Chemistry 2026, DOI: 10.1021/prechem.5c00449

    2026 doi

  10. [18]

    Scheffler, M

    M. Scheffler, M. Aeschlimann, M. Albrecht, T. Bereau, H. J. Bungartz, C. Felser, M. Greiner, A. Gross, C. T. Koch, K. Kremer, W. E. Nagel, M. Scheidgen, C. Woll, C. Draxl, Nature 2022, 604, 635

    2022

  11. [19]

    Govindarajan, A

    N. Govindarajan, A. Xu, K. Chan, Science 2022, 375, 379

    2022

  12. [20]

    X. Qin, T. Vegge, H. A. Hansen, ACS Catal. 2024, 14, 8168

    2024

  13. [21]

    X. Qin, T. Vegge, H. A. Hansen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 1897

    2023

  14. [22]

    X. Qin, H. A. Hansen, K. Honkala, M. M. Melander, Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 7607. 35

    2023

  15. [23]

    Y. Wang, Z. Wu, Y. Jiang, D. Zhang, Q. Wang, C. Wang, H. Li, X. Jia, J. Fan, H. Li, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, e06314

    2025

  16. [24]

    J. W. Rodriguez-Acosta, A. Etxebarria, P. V. Sruthibhai, S. Barja, F. Calle -Vallejo, M. Garcia- Melchor, P. Rodriguez, ACS Electrochem. 2026, 2, 1055

    2026

  17. [25]

    Nemukula, C

    E. Nemukula, C. B. Mtshali, F. Nemangwele, S. Klyamkin, Int. J. Energy Res. 2025, 2025 , 6300225

    2025

  18. [26]

    S. Orimo,Y. Nakamori, J. R. Eliseo, A. Zu¨ ttel , C. M. Jensen, Chem. Rev 2007, 107, 4111

    2007

  19. [27]

    X. Qian, B. J. Yoon, R. Arroyave, X. Qian, E. R. Dougherty, Patterns 2023, 4, 100863

    2023

  20. [28]

    Shimakawa, A

    H. Shimakawa, A. Kumada, M. Sato, npj Comput. Mater. 2024, 10, 11

    2024

  21. [29]

    K. Li, A. N. Rubungo, X. Lei, D. Persaud, K. Choudhary, B. DeCost, A. B. Dieng, J. Hattrick - Simpers, Communications Materials 2025, 6, 9

    2025

  22. [30]

    Zhong, B

    X. Zhong, B. Gallagher, S. Liu, B. Kailkhura, A. Hiszpanski, T. Y. -J. Han, npj Comput. Mater. 2022, 8, 204

    2022

  23. [31]

    C. Ma, Y. Wang, D. Zhang, W. Du, Q. Gao, R. Su, K. Xu, H. Gu, L. Li, P. Ma, H. Li, Digital Discovery 2026, DOI: 10.1039/d6dd00218h

    2026 doi

  24. [32]

    J. F. Joung, N. Casetti, P. Raghavan, C. W. Coley, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2026, DOI: 10.1039/d6cs00079g

    2026 doi

  25. [33]

    H. Liu, D. Zhang, S. M. Holmes, C. D'Agostino, H. Li, Chem. Sci. 2023, 14, 9000

    2023

  26. [34]

    J. K. Nø rskov, A. Logadottir, L. Lindqvist, J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 17886

    2004

  27. [35]

    Zhang, F

    D. Zhang, F. She, J. Chen, L. Wei, H. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 6076

    2025

  28. [36]

    Q. Wang, F. Yang, Y. Wang, D. Zhang, R. Sato, L. Zhang, E. J. Cheng, Y. Yan, Y. Chen, K. Kisu, S. I. Orimo, H. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025, 64, e202506573

    2025

  29. [37]

    Campos dos Santos, R

    E. Campos dos Santos, R. Sato, K. Kisu, K. Sau, X. Jia, F. Yang, S. Orimo, H. Li, Chem. Mater. 2023, 35, 5996

    2023

  30. [38]

    Hirscher, V

    M. Hirscher, V. A. Yartys, M. Baricco, J. Bellosta von Colbe, D. Blanchard, R. C. Bowman, D. P. Broom, C. E. Buckley, F. Chang, P. Chen, Y. W. Cho, J.-C. Crivello, F. Cuevas, W. I. F. David, P. E. de Jongh, R. V. Denys, M. Dornheim, M. Felderhoff, Y. Filinchuk, G. E. Froudakis...

    2020

  31. [39]

    K. T. Møller, M. B. Ley, P. Schouwink, R. Černý, T. R. Jensen, Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 831

    2016

  32. [40]

    Yartys, R

    V. Yartys, R. Denys, J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 645, S412

    2015

  33. [42]

    S. Dong, C. Li, J. Wang, H. Liu, Z. Ding, Z. Gao, W. Yang, W. Lv, L. Wei, Y. Wu, H. Li, J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 22363

    2022

  34. [43]

    W. Yang, Z. Jia, B. Zhou, L. Wei, Z. Gao, H. Li, Commun. Chem. 2023, 6, 6

    2023

  35. [44]

    J. K. Nø rskov, T. Bligaard, A. Logadottir, S. Bahn, L. B. Hansen, M. Bollinger, H. Bengaard, B. Hammer, Z. Sljivancanin, M. Mavrikakis, Y. Xu, S. Dahl, C. J. H. Jacobsen, J. Catal. 2002, 209, 275

    2002

  36. [45]

    Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, N. Ma, J. Zhao, Y. Xiong, S. Luo, J. Fan, Surf. Interfaces 2024, 50, 104498

    2024

  37. [46]

    Calle-Vallejo, D

    F. Calle-Vallejo, D. Loffreda, M. T. Koper, P. Sautet, Nat. Chem. 2015, 7, 403

    2015

  38. [47]

    Famprikis, P

    T. Famprikis, P. Canepa, J. A. Dawson, M. S. Islam, C. Masquelier, Nat. Mater. 2019, 18, 1278

    2019

  39. [48]

    J. B. Goodenough, K.-S. Park, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1167

    2013

  40. [49]

    E. J. Cheng, H. Duan, M. J. Wang, E. Kazyak, H. Munakata, R. Garcia-Mendez, B. Gao, H. Huo, T. Zhang, F. Chen, Energy Storage Mater. 2025, 75, 103970

    2025

  41. [50]

    Q. Wang, H. Li, R. Zhang, Z. Liu, H. Deng, W. Cen, Y. Yan, Y. Chen, Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 51, 630

    2022

  42. [51]

    Q. Wang, R. Sato, R. Garcí a-Mé ndez, W. Jang, P. Ou, A. Soon, J. Zhao, X. Wang, S.-i. Orimo, E. J. Cheng, AI Agent 2025, 1, 10

    2025

  43. [52]

    A. C. Dutra, B. A. Goldmann, M. S. Islam, J. A. Dawson, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2025, 10, 566

    2025

  44. [53]

    Q. Zhao, M. Avdeev, L. Chen, S. Shi, Sci. Bull. 2021, 66, 1401

    2021

  45. [54]

    Wang, L.-J

    D. Wang, L.-J. Jhang, R. Kou, M. Liao, S. Zheng, H. Jiang, P. Shi, G.-X. Li, K. Meng, D. Wang, Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 1895

    2023

  46. [55]

    E. J. Cheng, T. Yang, Y. Liu, L. Chai, R. Garcia-Mendez, E. Kazyak, Z. Fu, G. Luo, F. Chen, R. Inada, V. Badilita, H. Duan, Z. Wang, J. Qin, H. Li, S. -i. Orimo, H. Kato, Mater. Today Energy 2024, 44, 101644

    2024

  47. [56]

    S. H. Jang, Y. Yao, C. Liu, L. Zhang, D. Zhang, X. Jia, H.B. Tran, E.J. Cheng, R. Sato, Y. Ohashi, T. Sato, Y. Hashimoto, M. Allendorf, N. Artrith, M. Baricco, A. Borgschulte, D.P. Broom, A. 37 Cao, B.W.J. Chen, L. Chen, P. Chen, E.S. Cho, S. Deledda, Z. Ding, M. Dornheim, M. ...

    2026 doi arXiv

  48. [57]

    Mohtadi, S.-i

    R. Mohtadi, S.-i. Orimo, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 2, 16091

    2016

  49. [58]

    Schlapbach, A

    L. Schlapbach, A. Zü ttel, Nature 2001, 414, 353

    2001

  50. [59]

    Zü ttel, Mater

    A. Zü ttel, Mater. Today 2003, 6, 24

    2003

  51. [60]

    Bellosta von Colbe, J.-R

    J. Bellosta von Colbe, J.-R. Ares, J. Barale, M. Baricco, C. Buckley, G. Capurso, N. Gallandat, D. M. Grant, M. N. Guzik, I. Jacob, E. H. Jensen, T. Jensen, J. Jepsen, T. Klassen, M. V. Lototskyy, K. Manickam, A. Montone, J. Puszkiel, S. Sartori, D. A. She ppard, A. Stuart, G....

    2019

  52. [61]

    Hirscher, V

    M. Hirscher, V. A. Yartys, M. Baricco, J. Bellosta von Colbe, D. Blanchard, R. C. Bowman, D. P. Broom, C. E. Buckley, F. Chang, P. Chen, Y. W. Cho, J.-C. Crivello, F. Cuevas, W. I. F. David, P. E. de Jongh, R. V. Denys, M. Dornheim, M. Felderhoff, Y. Filinchuk, G. E. Froudakis...

    2020

  53. [62]

    I. P. Jain, C. Lal, A. Jain, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 5133

    2010

  54. [63]

    M. D. Witman, K. P. Brooks, S. J. Sprik, B. C. Wood, T. W. Heo, K. G. Ray, L. E. Klebanoff, A. Acosta, V. Stavila, M. D. Allendorf, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2411763

    2024

  55. [64]

    D. P. Broom, M. Hirscher, ChemPhysChem 2021, 22, 2141

    2021

  56. [65]

    S. H. Jang, D. Zhang, X. Jia, H. Tran, L. Zhang, R. Sato, Y. Hashimoto, T. Sato, K. Konno, S. Orimo, H. Li, arXiv:2603.14139 2026, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.14139

    2026 doi

  57. [66]

    C. Li, W. Yang, H. Liu, X. Liu, X. Xing, Z. Gao, S. Dong, H. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202320151. 38

    2024

  58. [67]

    J. Cai, H. Wang, X. Tang, Z. Miao, T. Yao, Y. Liu, H. Wang, Z. Gao, W. Yang, J. Energy Storage 2025, 136, 118450

    2025

  59. [68]

    H. Xin, S. Linic, J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 221101

    2010

  60. [69]

    Zhang, Z

    D. Zhang, Z. Wang, F. Liu, P. Yi, L. Peng, Y. Chen, L. Wei, H. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 3210

    2024

  61. [70]

    Z. Liu, Y. Liu, Y. Zhang, Y. Deng, Z. Zheng, R. Knibbe, T. Gao, M. Li, Z. Wang, B. Zhang, X. Jia, D. Zhang, H. Liu, X. Shao, Z. Gao, L. Wei, H. Li, W. Yang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2026, 65, e18027

    2026

  62. [71]

    S. H. Jang, D. Zhang, X. Jia, H. B. Tran, L. Zhang, R. Sato, Y. Hashimoto, Y. Ohashi, T. Sato, K. Konno, S. I. Orimo, H. Li, Chem. Sci. 2026, DOI: 10.1039/d6sc03089k

    2026 doi

  63. [72]

    Y. Lin, P. Ou, AI Agent 2025, 1, 3

    2025

  64. [73]

    H. B. Tao, L. Fang, J. Chen, H. B. Yang, J. Gao, J. Miao, S. Chen, B. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 9978

    2016

  65. [74]

    Hammer, J

    B. Hammer, J. K. Nø rskov, in Adv. Catal., 2000, 45, 71

    2000

  66. [75]

    R. Ren, Y. Wang, B. Li, H. Fan, H. Li, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2026, 17, 5583

    2026

  67. [76]

    H. Li, Z. Fu, Y. Yuan, D. Zhang, Y. Chen, H. Li, A. Cao, Chem. Sci. 2026, 17, 7947

    2026

  68. [77]

    A. Cao, J. K. Nø rskov, ACS Catal. 2023, 13, 3456

    2023

  69. [78]

    A. Cao, V. J. Bukas, V. Shadravan, Z. Wang, H. Li, J. Kibsgaard, I. Chorkendorff, J. K. Norskov, Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2382

    2022

  70. [79]

    Y. You, D. Zhang, F. Wu, X. Cao, Y. Sun, Z.-Z. Zhu, S. Wu, npj Comput. Mater. 2024, 10, 57

    2024

  71. [80]

    Z. Xu, H. Duan, Z. Dou, M. Zheng, Y. Lin, Y. Xia, H. Zhao, Y. Xia, npj Comput. Mater. 2023, 9, 105

    2023

  72. [81]

    R. Wang, M. Guo, Y. Gao, X. Wang, Y. Zhang, B. Deng, M. Shi, L. Zhang, Z. Zhong, npj Comput. Mater. 2025, 11, 266

    2025

  73. [82]

    J. Chen, M. Fang, Q. Wu, S. Tang, J. Zheng, C. Wei, X. Cao, Y. Shi, N. Xu, Y. He, Chem. Mater. 2025, 37, 591

    2025

  74. [83]

    Z. Chen, T. Du, N. M. A. Krishnan, Y. Yue, M. M. Smedskjaer, Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 1057

    2025

  75. [84]

    Fukuda, Y

    M. Fukuda, Y. Li, J. Wei, K. Harata, G. Luo, G. J. Snyder, Y. S. Sato, H. Kato, E. J. Cheng, Small 2025, 21, e06257

    2025

  76. [85]

    Witman, S

    M. Witman, S. Ling, D. M. Grant, G. S. Walker, S. Agarwal, V. Stavila, M. D. Allendorf, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 40. 39

    2020

  77. [86]

    S. H. Jang, D. Zhang, H. B. Tran, X. Jia, K. Konno, R. Sato, S. I. Orimo, H. Li, Chem. Sci. 2025, 16, 23111

    2025

  78. [87]

    S. H. Jang, arXiv:2510.18325 2025, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.18325

    2025 doi

  79. [88]

    O. T. Unke, S. Chmiela, H. E. Sauceda, M. Gastegger, I. Poltavsky, K. T. Schutt, A. Tkatchenko, K. R. Muller, Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 10142

    2021

  80. [89]

    Angeletti, L

    A. Angeletti, L. Leoni, D. Massa, L. Pasquini, S. Papanikolaou, C. Franchini, npj Comput. Mater. 2025, 11, 85

    2025

  81. [90]

    H. Kwon, M. Shiga, H. Kimizuka, T. Oda, Acta Mater. 2023, 247, 118739

    2023

  82. [91]

    W. Lin, L. Jin, Z. Jiang, M. Cai, Z. Lai, D. Yurchenko, B. Yan, S. Zhou, K. S. Novoselov, W. H. Liao, S. Fang, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2026, 36, e75070

    2026

  83. [92]

    Liang, X

    B. Liang, X. Huang, S. Tan, T. Wang, C. Ji, T. Si, X. Li, H. Chen, Y. Xie, L. Jiang, C. Zhao, J. Fan, T. Hou, Q. Zhang, Energy Environ. Sci. 2026, 19, 1616

    2026

  84. [93]

    X. Jia, Z. Yu, F. Liu, H. Liu, D. Zhang, E. Campos Dos Santos, H. Zheng, Y. Hashimoto, Y. Chen, L. Wei, H. Li, Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, e2305630

    2024

  85. [94]

    Zhang, H

    D. Zhang, H. Li, J. Mater. Chem. A 2024, 12, 13742

    2024

  86. [95]

    S. W. Ying, Y. Wang, P. Du, Q. Wang, C. Yue, D. Zhang, Z. C. Chen, J. W. Zheng, S. Y. Xie, H. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025, 64, e202511924

    2025

  87. [96]

    S. Ye, Y. Wang, H. Liu, D. Zhang, X. Jia, L. Zhang, Y. Zhang, A. Kumatani, H. Shiku, H. Li, J. Mater. Chem. A 2025, 13, 37821

    2025

  88. [97]

    X. Guo, Z. Wang, J.-H. Yang, X.-G. Gong, J Mater. Chem. A 2024, 12, 10124

    2024

  89. [98]

    A. D. Dembitskiy, I. S. Humonen, R. A. Eremin, D. A. Aksyonov, S. S. Fedotov, S. A. Budennyy, npj Comput. Mater. 2025, 11, 131

    2025

  90. [99]

    Q. Wang, F. Yang, Y. Wang, D. Zhang, R. Sato, L. Zhang, E. J. Cheng, Y. Yan, Y. Chen, K. Kisu, S.-i. Orimo, H. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025, 64, e202506573

    2025

  91. [100]

    Zhang, J

    J. Zhang, J. Li, G. Zhao, Q. Wang, Y.-G. Guo, C. Yang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 40496

    2025

  92. [101]

    A. Laio, M. Parrinello, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2002, 9, 12562

    2002

  93. [102]

    C. Li, W. Yang, H. Liu, X. Liu, X. Xing, Z. Gao, S. Dong, H. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202320151

    2024

  94. [103]

    Mishra, J

    A. Mishra, J. Pascasio, J. Yang, W. Li, AI Agent 2026, 2, 6

    2026

  95. [104]

    Zhang, X

    D. Zhang, X. Jia, H. Liu, Y. Wang, S. Ye, Q. Jiang, Y. Wang, Z. Guo, L. Zhang, L. Wei, W. Yang, H. Liu, S. Zhao, H. Xu, D. Cheng, Y. Hashimoto, T. Tomai, H. Li, AI Agent 2025, 1, 2. 40

    2025

  96. [105]

    Zhang, Z

    D. Zhang, Z. Bao, Y. Chu, Z. Guo, X. Jia, Q. Jiang, H. Liu, T. Liu, T. Lu, Y. Lu, D. D. Shah, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, S. Ye, S. Ying, Z. Yu, L. Zhang, S. Zhao, H. Li, Chem Catalysis 2026, 6, 101775

    2026

  97. [106]

    Cheng, H.i Liu, J

    Z. Cheng, H.i Liu, J. Du, P. Ma, H. Yin, D. Zhang, H. Li, Y. Chen, AI Agent 2026, 2, 8

    2026

  98. [107]

    Chanussot, A

    L. Chanussot, A. Das, S. Goyal, T. Lavril, M. Shuaibi, M. Riviere, K. Tran, J. Heras -Domingo, C. Ho, W. Hu, A. Palizhati, A. Sriram, B. Wood, J. Yoon, D. Parikh, C. L. Zitnick, Z. Ulissi, ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 6059

    2021

  99. [108]

    R. Tran, J. Lan, M. Shuaibi, B. M. Wood, S. Goyal, A. Das, J. Heras -Domingo, A. Kolluru, A. Rizvi, N. Shoghi, A. Sriram, F. Therrien, J. Abed, O. Voznyy, E. H. Sargent, Z. Ulissi, C. L. Zitnick, ACS Catal. 2023, 13, 3066

    2023

  100. [109]

    F. Yang, E. Campos dos Santos, X. Jia, R. Sato, K. Kisu, Y. Hashimoto, S.-i. Orimo, H. Li, Nano Mater. Sci. 2024, 6, 256

    2024

  101. [110]

    Nakamura, N

    K. Nakamura, N. Takenaka, M. Hanai, Y. Oikawa, R. Tamura, K. Tsuda, M. Nakayama, J. Shiomi, A. Yamada, npj Comput. Mater. 2026, 12

    2026

  102. [111]

    Y. Hong, X. Mao, AI Agent 2026, 2, 2

    2026

  103. [112]

    Zhang, X

    D. Zhang, X. Jia, H. B. Tran, S. H. Jang, L. Zhang, R. Sato, Y. Hashimoto, T. Sato, K. Konno, S. I. Orimo, H. Li, Chem. Sci. 2026, 17, 3031

    2026

  104. [113]

    Sandrock, G

    G. Sandrock, G. Thomas, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 2001, 72, 153

    2001

  105. [114]

    A. Jain, S. P. Ong, G. Hautier, W. Chen, W. D. Richards, S. Dacek, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, D. Skinner, G. Ceder, APL Mater. 2013, 1, 011002

    2013

  106. [115]

    Curtarolo, W

    S. Curtarolo, W. Setyawan, G. L. Hart, M. Jahnatek, R. V. Chepulskii, R. H. Taylor, S. Wang, J. Xue, K. Yang, O. Levy, Comput. Mater. Sci. 2012, 58, 218

    2012

  107. [116]

    M. A. Akhound, T. M. Boland, M. O. Sauer, M. Batzill, B. M. Abraham, S. Canulescu, Y. Gogotsi, P. Hofmann, A. Kis, J. Lu, T. Michely, S. Raza, W. Ren, J. A. Robinson, Z. Sofer, J. Teng, S. Ulstrup, M. Zhao, X. Zhao, J. J. Mortensen, T. Olsen, K. S. Thygesen, ACS Nano 2026, 20, 12008

    2026

  108. [117]

    Ishii, T

    M. Ishii, T. Ito, H. Sado, I. Kuwajima, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater.: Methods 2024, 4, 2354649

    2024

  109. [118]

    Belsky, M

    A. Belsky, M. Hellenbrandt, V. L. Karen, P. Luksch, Acta Crystallogr. B 2002, 58, 364

    2002

  110. [119]

    X. Wang, Z. Li, D. Zhang, H. Li, H. Xu, D. Cheng, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2026, 65, e24612

    2026

  111. [120]

    H. X. Weijian Chen, Daojian Cheng, AI Agent 2026, 2, 12

    2026

  112. [121]

    X. Hu, S. Chen, L. Chen, H. Wang, X. Zhang, Z. Zhou, Natl Sci Rev 2025, 12, nwaf372

    2025

  113. [122]

    Yao, Y.Yan, Y

    T. Yao, Y.Yan, Y. Yang, Z. Wang, X. Shao, Z. Gao, W. Yang, AI Agent 2025, 1. 41

    2025

  114. [123]

    Q. Wang, R. Garcí a-Mé ndez, W. Jang, P. Ou, A. Soon, J. Zhao, X. Wang, S.-i. Orimo, E. J. Cheng, AI Agent 2025, 1, 10

    2025

  115. [124]

    H. L. Chaoyue Zhao1 AI Agent 2026, 2

    2026

  116. [125]

    Fortunelli, AI Agent 2026, 2

    A. Fortunelli, AI Agent 2026, 2

    2026

  117. [126]

    X. Jia , Y. Lu, Q. Wang , H. Li, AI Agent 2026, 2, 1

    2026

  118. [127]

    F. Yang, R. Sato, E. J. Cheng, K. Kisu, Q. Wang, X. Jia, S.-i. Orimo, H. Li, J. Electrochem. 2024, 30, 2415001

    2024

  119. [128]

    Z. Wang, X. Lin, Y. Han, J. Cai, S. Wu, X. Yu, J. Li, Nano Energy 2021, 89, 106337

    2021

  120. [129]

    A. D. Sendek, G. Cheon, M. Pasta, E. J. Reed, J Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 8067

    2020

  121. [130]

    A. G. Kusne, H. Yu, C. Wu, H. Zhang, J. Hattrick -Simpers, B. DeCost, S. Sarker, C. Oses, C. Toher, S. Curtarolo, A. V. Davydov, R. Agarwal, L. A. Bendersky, M. Li, A. Mehta, I. Takeuchi, Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5966

    2020

  122. [131]

    Zhang, X

    D. Zhang, X. Jia, Y. Wang, H. Liu, Q. Wang, S. H. Jang, D. Shah, S. Ye, H. B. Tran, H. Li, Chem Sci 2026, 17, 5782

    2026

  123. [132]

    Department of R&D for Future Creation, Retrieved from https://www.jst.go.jp/gtex/en/field/hydrogen.html

    Japan Science and Technology Agency. Department of R&D for Future Creation, Retrieved from https://www.jst.go.jp/gtex/en/field/hydrogen.html

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.