Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 87 references

Thin-shell black holes and wormholes have computable elastic stiffness: the quadratic response of the partition function to shape and mass wiggles of the shell equals two-point functions of Liouville defect operators, with explicit spectra,

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 21:11 UTC pith:O65F6KHO

load-bearing objection A genuinely new class of observables—stiffness kernels for thin-shell AdS3 geometries—derived cleanly from Liouville, with the main caveat that the deformed-defect dictionary is inherited from [3] and not independently verified. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2607.16155 v1 pith:O65F6KHO submitted 2026-07-17 hep-th

Elastic stiffness of three-dimensional black holes and wormholes from Liouville line defects

Jeevan Chandra , Boris Post This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords thin-shell black holesLiouville line defectsstiffness kernelselastic deformationswormholesholographic CFTdisplacement operatorconformal welding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that thin-shell black holes and wormholes in 3D anti-de Sitter gravity behave like elastic bodies: their partition function responds quadratically to wiggles of the shell's shape and to inhomogeneities in its mass density, and these responses can be computed exactly in the semiclassical limit. Working through the Liouville description of line defects, the authors obtain stiffness kernels that are two-point functions of two defect-local operators—the displacement operator D_perp and the mass-density operator M—with the mass kernel universally equal to the inverse sum of two Dirichlet-to-Neumann eigenvalues. The kernels' spectra are worked out in four geometries; they are continuous when the cycle transverse to the shell is non-compact and discrete when it is compact, which decides whether a Lorentzian perturbation relaxes or oscillates forever. For the sphere wormhole the relaxation times are t_rel = 2/m_0 (shape) and 4/m_0 (mass). The paper closes by showing that shape deformations increase, while fixed-mass density redistributions decrease, the apparent-horizon and PETS entanglement entropies—a concrete imprint on black hole microstate statistics.

Core claim

The central discovery is a solvable deformation theory for backreacting non-conformal line defects. For a shell with undeformed mass m0 on a circle, a transverse wiggle ξ(x) or a fixed-total-mass density fluctuation µ(x) changes the on-shell action by a quadratic form whose Fourier coefficients are explicit functions of m0, temperature, and two Dirichlet-to-Neumann eigenvalues λ±,n obtained from the linearized Liouville equation with shell junction conditions: K_mass,n = 1/(λ+,n + λ−,n), and K_shape,n = m0(r0^2 + n^2 log r0) − m0^2 λ+,n λ−,n/(λ+,n + λ−,n) in the black-hole geometries, with frame-dependent local terms elsewhere. The same kernels are two-point functions of D_perp and M, with p

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Dirichlet-to-Neumann eigenvalue pair λ±,n of the linearized Liouville equation. A Liouville line defect is a worldline insertion exp((m0/2πb)∫dℓ φ) that plays the role of the thin shell; across it the Liouville field is continuous but its normal derivative jumps by −2m0. For each Fourier mode n, the linearized field is normalized to one on the shell and solved in the two regions adjacent to it, and λ±,n are the (minus) normal derivatives at the shell. All stiffness kernels are assembled from these eigenvalues—the mass kernel is their inverse sum, the shape kernel is a combination of their product over sum plus local geometric terms—and their spectral densities

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that line defects in the compact holographic CFT, Liouville line defects, and thin-shell AdS3 saddles are semiclassically the same object—plus the restriction to identical deformations on the two boundaries, which leaves the asymmetric sector untested.

What would settle it

Take the sphere one-point wormhole, perturb the equatorial shell by a single Fourier mode (say n=2), and solve the full 3D thin-shell Einstein equations to second order in the perturbation; the quadratic shift in the on-shell action must equal the stiffness kernel of Eq. (2.24). Any deviation—or a measurement of ⟨D_perp D_perp⟩ in a compact CFT with a heavy line defect that does not show the predicted density ρ_D = (c m0^2/6π)ω(ω^2+R^{-2})/(ω^2+m0^2/4)—would falsify the Liouville reduction.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The mass-deformation kernel is universal: for every thin-shell black hole or wormhole studied, the quadratic response to a fixed-total-mass density mode is 1/(λ+,n + λ−,n), so it can be read off from the background Liouville solution alone.
  • The spectrum of the displacement operator is continuous or discrete according to the compactness of the slice transverse to the shell, which determines whether a transient deformation relaxes (continuous) or produces persistent finite-volume oscillations (discrete).
  • The sphere wormhole's shape and mass channels relax on times 2/m0 and 4/m0, respectively, with the shape channel behaving like an overdamped and the mass channel like an underdamped oscillator.
  • Shape deformations increase the apparent-horizon and PETS entanglement entropies at fixed total mass, while mass-density deformations decrease them.
  • In the heavy-shell limit the shape-stiffness response reduces to the universal Schwarzian/conformal-welding response, connecting shell elasticity to Virasoro coadjoint orbits.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same dictionary holds beyond the symmetric sector, the antisymmetric stiffness kernel of the almost-Fuchsian metric proposed in the discussion should yield cross-boundary displacement correlators; positivity of that matrix would be a natural consistency test of the wormhole Hilbert-space interpretation.
  • The continuous-versus-discrete spectral dichotomy probably generalizes beyond these examples: in any defect CFT with a compact transverse cycle, shape deformations should oscillate rather than relax—a prediction one could test in lattice or numerical CFT studies.
  • The opposite signs of the shape and mass entropy corrections suggest a statistical interpretation: shape fluctuations open up new microscopic configurations while fixed-mass redistribution closes them off; counting microstates directly would test whether this sign pattern is universal.
  • A next-order (1/c) calculation of the sphere-wormhole relaxation pole would show whether t_rel = 2/m0 is an artifact of the Liouville saddle or a genuine gravitational timescale.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies elastic deformations of thin-shell AdS3 black holes and wormholes sourced by non-conformal line defects. Using the Liouville line defect description, the authors compute the quadratic response of the partition function to transverse shape deformations and to inhomogeneous mass-density deformations, defining stiffness kernels. They obtain universal expressions in terms of Dirichlet-to-Neumann eigenvalues (e.g., K_mass = 1/(λ_+ + λ_-)), compute the spectra of the associated displacement and mass-density operators (continuous or discrete depending on the compactness of the transverse cycle), and extract Lorentzian retarded correlators and relaxation times. They also compute corrections to apparent-horizon and PETS entanglement entropies. The derivations are explicit and internally consistent, with spot-checks of the Schwarzian limit and the pole structure passing.

Significance. If the central Liouville/CFT correspondence holds, the stiffness kernels constitute genuinely new observables for backreacting non-conformal line defects, connecting elastic response, conformal welding, and Schwarzian dynamics. The paper is careful and technical: it provides closed-form kernels, spectral densities, and Green's functions, and it gives quantitative predictions (e.g., t_rel = 2/m0 and 4/m0 for the sphere wormhole, and sign-definite entropy corrections). The explicit, checkable computations and the clear framing of conjectures are strengths. The main caveat is the inherited dictionary from [3]; the results are conditional on that dictionary extending to deformed loci.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sec. 1.2, Eq. (1.14)] The dictionary ⟨D†_Σ D_Σ⟩_CFT = |⟨L_Σ⟩_ZZ|² is imported from [3] for undeformed, symmetric saddles. The paper then uses this correspondence operationally for deformed loci y=εξ(x) and m=m0+εμ(x). No argument is given that the Liouville saddle continues to capture the full large-c response of the CFT defect under deformation; additional contributions from subleading defect operators or from the conformal welding map could shift the kernels. The Schwarzian limit (2.35) is a necessary consistency check but does not exclude such contributions. I ask the authors to either (i) provide an argument or a concrete check that the deformed Liouville two-point functions equal the CFT ones at quadratic order, or (ii) explicitly state this as an assumption and temper the claim that the kernels are CFT two-point functions.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figures 2 and 3] The symbols ωp and ωt used in the plots are not defined in the captions. Please define them (e.g., as local maxima/minima of the spectral density).
  2. [Sec. 2.2 and 3.2] The conjectural statements (2.42) and (3.27) are introduced in the main text. It would be clearer to mark them explicitly as conjectures that are not needed for the rest of the paper.
  3. [Sec. 4.1.1] The statement that the relaxation time is identical for shape and mass deformations is based on numerical extraction from Eq. (4.34). Please clarify whether this is an exact result or a numerical observation.
  4. [Notation] The normalization of the spectral densities ρ_D and ρ_M differs by factors of c/3 between sections (e.g., Eq. (1.26) vs Eq. (2.50)). A single stated convention would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No definitional or fitted-input circularity: the stiffness kernels, spectra, and relaxation times are derived by solving the linearized Liouville boundary-value problem. The only notable dependence is the inherited [3] thin-shell/Liouville correspondence, which is a correctness assumption rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central computations are self-contained linearized Liouville derivations. The shell is displaced by y = ε ξ(x) or perturbed in mass by m(x) = m0 + ε μ(x); the linearized Liouville equation and junction conditions are solved explicitly, and the quadratic on-shell action is evaluated. For example, K_mass,n = 1/(λ_+,n + λ_-,n) follows directly from the linearized solution φ_n = 2 μ_n/(λ_+ + λ_-) û_n evaluated in S2 = -(1/8π)∫ μ φ, not from any fitted parameter or target observable. The background parameters m0, β, τ0, and rH are inputs specifying the undeformed saddle; the pole equations, spectral densities, relaxation times, and entropy corrections are outputs. The identification K_shape = ⟨D⊥ D⊥⟩ and K_mass = ⟨M M⟩ is a standard source-operator definition (Eqs. 1.22–1.24 and 1.33–1.35), not a separate prediction smuggled back in. The paper explicitly restricts to reflection-symmetric deformations and defers asymmetric almost-Fuchsian cases to future work, which is a scope limitation rather than circularity. The main inherited input is the [3] correspondence equating thin-shell saddles, CFT line defects, and Liouville line defects; the present paper assumes this dictionary continues to hold under deformation. That is a substantive correctness risk, but it is not an equation reducing to its own input by construction. Hence no significant circularity; score 2 reflects the inherited self-cited correspondence without treating it as a circular step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 6 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central results depend on the shell mass m0, temperature beta, and separation tau0 as inputs; these are physical parameters, not fitted data. The main domain assumption is the Liouville line-defect correspondence and the symmetric-deformation foliation. No genuinely new entities are introduced beyond standard defect operators.

free parameters (3)
  • m0 (shell mass / defect coupling)
    Input specifying the line defect; all kernels, spectra, and relaxation times are functions of it. Chosen by hand per background, not fitted to data.
  • beta (inverse temperature / torus cycle length)
    Input for torus wormhole and PETS black hole; controls discreteness of spectra.
  • tau0 (shell separation / Euclidean time)
    Input for one-sided and PETS black holes; relaxation time monotonicity is studied as a function of it.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Thin-shell line defect correspondence of [3]: semiclassical partition functions of thin-shell AdS3 saddles are computed by Liouville line defects (Eqs. (1.13)-(1.14)).
    The paper's stiffness kernels are functional derivatives of these Liouville-reduced partition functions; if the correspondence fails for deformed shells, the central claim fails.
  • domain assumption The foliation ansatz ds^2 = drho^2 + cosh^2(rho) e^Phi(dx^2+dy^2) (Eq. (2.1)) remains valid for symmetric deformations of wormhole shells.
    Stated in Sec. 1.1 and Sec. 2; asymmetric deformations would require an almost-Fuchsian metric (Eq. (6.3)) left to future work.
  • domain assumption Linearized Liouville equation with linearized junction conditions (continuity of Phi, jump of normal derivative by -2m0) determines the quadratic on-shell action.
    Derived in Appendix A; standard second-variation argument; requires the background saddle to be on-shell.
  • domain assumption Reflection positivity and KMS structure of the separated-point kernels justify the spectral decomposition (2.44) with positive spectral density.
    Assumed in Sec. 2.3 for the non-contact part of the kernels.
  • standard math Retarded correlators obtained by i omega_n -> omega + i0^+ analytic continuation with damping prescription.
    Standard thermal field theory analytic continuation; used throughout Sec. 1.5 and Sec. 2.3.
  • ad hoc to paper Nonlinear heavy-shell response governed by the Schwarzian/coadjoint-orbit action (Eqs. (2.42), (3.27)).
    Explicitly conjectured by the authors; not used in the central linearized results.
invented entities (2)
  • Displacement operator D_perp(x) independent evidence
    purpose: Defect-local operator conjugate to transverse shape deformations; via (1.21)-(1.24) its Euclidean two-point function is the shape stiffness kernel.
    Standard displacement operator for line defects ([13]); the paper computes its spectral density and relaxation poles, which are falsifiable by independent Liouville/CFT methods.
  • Mass-density operator M(x) independent evidence
    purpose: Defect-local operator conjugate to inhomogeneous mass-density deformations; its two-point function is the mass stiffness kernel; related to the defect stress tensor T_D via (1.37).
    Identified by the authors with the defect stress tensor / dilaton spurion of defect RG ([14]); its two-point function is computed and could be checked by defect bootstrap or Liouville correlators.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 60142 in / 20361 out tokens · 159453 ms · 2026-08-01T21:11:26.816265+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study elastic deformations of thin-shell black holes and wormholes in AdS$_3$ gravity. These geometries are sourced by line defects in the dual conformal field theory, and their shape and mass distribution define elastic moduli of the gravitational saddle. We compute the quadratic response of the partition function to these deformations, defining stiffness kernels for both transverse shape fluctuations and inhomogeneous mass-density fluctuations. The computation of the stiffness kernels can be realized as a hyperbolic response to a conformal welding problem which reduces to the universal Schwarzian response in the heavy-shell limit. The stiffness kernels are two-point functions of defect-local operators in CFT: the displacement operator, which measures the response to shape deformations, and a mass-density operator, which measures the response to local changes in the shell density. We compute the spectrum of these operators in the semiclassical limit, in various black hole and wormhole backgrounds. The spectrum can be discrete or continuous depending on the existence of a non-compact direction transverse to the shell in the geometry. We also provide a Lorentzian interpretation for the stiffness kernels using linear response theory and compute the relaxation time scales towards the corresponding transient deformations in the dual holographic CFT. Lastly, we compute the effect of these elastic deformations on black hole microstate statistics and black hole entropy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.16155 by Boris Post, Jeevan Chandra.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The figure on the left is a sketch of a hyperbolic surface folded across a Liouville [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A plot of the spectral density of the displacement operator for the one-sided black hole [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A plot of the spectral density of the mass-density operator for the one-sided black hole [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A plot of the relaxation time trel against the separation τ0 between the pair of defects in the holographic CFT sourcing the one-sided black hole, for various values of the mass parameter/ defect coupling. The slope is positive for each of the curves, thereby illustrating that the relaxation time increases monotonically with the defect separation. Since the relaxation times are identical for the shape or m… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Plot of the mode corrections to the apparent-horizon entropy ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Mode corrections to the apparent-horizon entropy ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Correction to PETS entanglement entropy induced by shape deformation modes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Correction to PETS entanglement entropy induced by mass deformation modes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The figure shows the sphere 1-point wormhole used to compute the stiffness kernel for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: This figure describes the conformal welding across the deformed shell locus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The figure shows a sketch of the torus 1-point wormhole used to compute the stiffness [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: This figure describes the annular sewing across the deformed shell locus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: A plot of the displacement operator spectrum for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: A plot of the mass-density operator spectrum for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: The one-sided black hole set-up. a) The standard spherically symmetric geometry, formed by gluing a portion of the Euclidean BTZ (−) to global EAdS3 (+) across a thin shell (orange). b) The same geometry, viewed in the cylinder frame, where now we allow the shell to wiggle along the transverse S 1 direction. separated in time but at a finite spatial volume determined by β, K shape WH,ret(t) ⊃ cm2 0 3 Θ(t)… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: The two-sided black hole set-up. a) The standard spherically symmetric geometry, gluing two portions of the non-rotating Euclidean BTZ black hole across a thin shell (orange). Here ℓ− = 2τ0, ℓ+ = β −2τ0 with the shell operator inserted at ±τ0. b) The same topology, viewed as A × I, where now we allow the shell to wiggle along the transverse S 1 direction. Here rH, r′ H are the radii of the two black hole … view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 61 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Anous, T

    T. Anous, T. Hartman, A. Rovai and J. Sonner, Black Hole Collapse in the 1/c Expansion, JHEP07, 123, 2016, [arXiv:1603.04856 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    Chandra and T

    J. Chandra and T. Hartman, Coarse graining pure states in AdS/CFT, JHEP10, 030, 2023, [arXiv:2206.03414 [hep-th]]. 86

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Chandra, T

    J. Chandra, T. Hartman and V. Meruliya, Statistics of three-dimensional black holes from Liouville line defects, JHEP11, 090, 2024, [arXiv:2404.15183 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Sasieta, Wormholes from heavy operator statistics in AdS/CFT, JHEP03, 158, 2023, [arXiv:2211.11794 [hep-th]]

    M. Sasieta, Wormholes from heavy operator statistics in AdS/CFT, JHEP03, 158, 2023, [arXiv:2211.11794 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    I. Bah, Y. Chen and J. Maldacena, Estimating global charge violating amplitudes from wormholes, JHEP04, 061, 2023, [arXiv:2212.08668 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, Conformal symmetry two-dimensional space: Recursion representation of conformal block, Theor. Math. Phys.73, 1088–1093, 1987

    1987

  7. [7]

    H. L. Verlinde, Conformal Field Theory, 2-DQuantum Gravity and Quantization of Teichmuller Space, Nucl. Phys. B337, 652–680, 1990

    1990

  8. [8]

    Witten, (2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System, Nucl

    E. Witten, (2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System, Nucl. Phys. B311, 46, 1988

    1988

  9. [9]

    J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux, Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity, Commun. Math. Phys.104, 207–226, 1986

    1986

  10. [10]

    Hartman, Entanglement Entropy at Large Central Charge, 2013, [arXiv:1303.6955 [hep-th]]

    T. Hartman, Entanglement Entropy at Large Central Charge, 2013, [arXiv:1303.6955 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  11. [11]

    Chandra, S

    J. Chandra, S. Collier, T. Hartman and A. Maloney, Semiclassical 3D gravity as an average of large-c CFTs, JHEP12, 069, 2022, [arXiv:2203.06511 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt and M. Zhang, Solving 3d gravity with Virasoro TQFT, SciPost Phys.15, 151, 2023, [arXiv:2304.13650 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Billo, V

    M. Billo, V. Goncalves, E. Lauria and M. Meineri, Defects in conformal field theory, JHEP 04, 091, 2016, [arXiv:1601.02883 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  14. [14]

    Cuomo, Z

    G. Cuomo, Z. Komargodski and A. Raviv-Moshe, Renormalization Group Flows on Line Defects, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 021603, 2022, [arXiv:2108.01117 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    M. S. Green, Markoff random processes and the statistical mechanics of time-dependent phenomena. II. irreversible processes in fluids, The Journal of Chemical Physics22, 398–413, 1954

    1954

  16. [16]

    Kubo, Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes

    R. Kubo, Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes. i. general theory and simple applications to magnetic and conduction problems, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 12, 570–586, 1957

    1957

  17. [17]

    Matsubara, A new approach to quantum-statistical mechanics, Progress of Theoretical Physics14, 351–378, 1955

    T. Matsubara, A new approach to quantum-statistical mechanics, Progress of Theoretical Physics14, 351–378, 1955. 87

    1955

  18. [18]

    P. C. Martin and J. Schwinger, Theory of many-particle systems. i, Physical Review115, 1342–1373, 1959

    1959

  19. [19]

    L. P. Kadanoff and P. C. Martin, Hydrodynamic equations and correlation functions, Annals of Physics24, 419–469, 1963

    1963

  20. [20]

    Birmingham, I

    D. Birmingham, I. Sachs and S. N. Solodukhin, Relaxation in conformal field theory, hawking–page transition, and quasinormal/normal modes, Phys. Rev. D67, 104026, 2003, [arXiv:hep-th/0212308]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  21. [21]

    D. Wang, Z. Wang and Z. Wei, Wormholes with ends of the world, JHEP2025, 166, 2025, [arXiv:2504.12278 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2025

  22. [23]

    Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys

    M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys. Rev. E50, 888–901, 1994, [arXiv:cond-mat/9403051]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  23. [24]

    Belin and J

    A. Belin and J. de Boer, Random statistics of OPE coefficients and Euclidean wormholes, Class. Quant. Grav.38, 164001, 2021, [arXiv:2006.05499 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  24. [25]

    Belin, J

    A. Belin, J. de Boer and D. Liska, Non-Gaussianities in the statistical distribution of heavy OPE coefficients and wormholes, JHEP06, 116, 2022, [arXiv:2110.14649 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  25. [26]

    Chandra, Euclidean wormholes in holographic RG flows, JHEP11, 096, 2024, [arXiv:2407.15630 [hep-th]]

    J. Chandra, Euclidean wormholes in holographic RG flows, JHEP11, 096, 2024, [arXiv:2407.15630 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  26. [27]

    Chandra, Euclidean wormholes for individual 2d CFTs, JHEP04, 051, 2024, [arXiv:2305.07183 [hep-th]]

    J. Chandra, Euclidean wormholes for individual 2d CFTs, JHEP04, 051, 2024, [arXiv:2305.07183 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [28]

    de Boer, D

    J. de Boer, D. Liska, B. Post and M. Sasieta, A principle of maximum ignorance for semiclassical gravity, JHEP2024, 003, 2024, [arXiv:2311.08132 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [29]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt and M. Zhang, 3d gravity from Virasoro TQFT: Holography, wormholes and knots, 2024, [arXiv:2401.13900 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [30]

    de Boer, D

    J. de Boer, D. Liˇ ska and B. Post, Multiboundary wormholes and OPE statistics, JHEP10, 207, 2024, [arXiv:2405.13111 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [31]

    Saad, Late Time Correlation Functions, Baby Universes, and ETH in JT Gravity, 2019, [arXiv:1910.10311 [hep-th]]

    P. Saad, Late Time Correlation Functions, Baby Universes, and ETH in JT Gravity, 2019, [arXiv:1910.10311 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  31. [32]

    Chandra, Statistics in 3d gravity from knots and links, JHEP12, 139, 2025, [arXiv:2508.10864 [hep-th]]

    J. Chandra, Statistics in 3d gravity from knots and links, JHEP12, 139, 2025, [arXiv:2508.10864 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [33]

    D. L. Jafferis, L. Rozenberg and G. Wong, 3d gravity as a random ensemble, JHEP02, 208, 2025, [arXiv:2407.02649 [hep-th]]. 88

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [34]

    Belin, S

    A. Belin, S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, D. Liska and B. Post, A universal sum over topologies in 3d gravity, 2026, [arXiv:2601.07906 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2026

  34. [35]

    A. Goel, H. T. Lam, G. J. Turiaci and H. Verlinde, Expanding the Black Hole Interior: Partially Entangled Thermal States in SYK, JHEP02, 156, 2019, [arXiv:1807.03916 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [36]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D7, 2333–2346, 1973

    1973

  36. [37]

    S. W. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes, Commun. Math. Phys.43, 199–220, 1975. [Erratum: Commun. Math. Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    1975

  37. [38]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from the anti-de sitter space/conformal field theory correspondence, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 181602, 2006, [arXiv:hep-th/0603001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  38. [39]

    V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP07, 062, 2007, [arXiv:0705.0016 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  39. [40]

    Penington, S

    G. Penington, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Replica wormholes and the black hole interior, JHEP03, 205, 2022, [arXiv:1911.11977 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  40. [41]

    Balasubramanian, A

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Lawrence, J. M. Magan and M. Sasieta, Microscopic Origin of the Entropy of Black Holes in General Relativity, Phys. Rev. X14, 011024, 2024, [arXiv:2212.02447 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  41. [42]

    Balasubramanian and T

    V. Balasubramanian and T. Yildirim, The nonperturbative Hilbert space of quantum gravity with one boundary, JHEP03, 040, 2026, [arXiv:2506.04319 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2026

  42. [43]

    Krasnov and J.-M

    K. Krasnov and J.-M. Schlenker, Minimal surfaces and particles in 3-manifolds, Geometriae Dedicata126, 187–254, 2007, [arXiv:math/0511441 [math.DG]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  43. [44]

    Maldacena, D

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space, PTEP2016, 12C104, 2016, [arXiv:1606.01857 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  44. [45]

    Stanford and E

    D. Stanford and E. Witten, Fermionic Localization of the Schwarzian Theory, JHEP10, 008, 2017, [arXiv:1703.04612 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [46]

    Schneider,Convex Bodies: The Brunn–Minkowski Theory, vol

    R. Schneider,Convex Bodies: The Brunn–Minkowski Theory, vol. 151 ofEncyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2 ed., 2014, 10.1017/CBO9781139003858

    doi:10.1017/cbo9781139003858 2014

  46. [47]

    Bers, Simultaneous uniformization, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society66, 94–97, 1960

    L. Bers, Simultaneous uniformization, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society66, 94–97, 1960. 89

    1960

  47. [48]

    Bers, Spaces of Riemann surfaces as bounded domains, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society66, 98–103, 1960

    L. Bers, Spaces of Riemann surfaces as bounded domains, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society66, 98–103, 1960

    1960

  48. [49]

    Witten, Coadjoint orbits of the Virasoro group, Communications in Mathematical Physics114, 1–53, 1988

    E. Witten, Coadjoint orbits of the Virasoro group, Communications in Mathematical Physics114, 1–53, 1988

    1988

  49. [50]

    Balog, L

    J. Balog, L. Feh´ er and L. Palla, Coadjoint orbits of the Virasoro algebra and the global Liouville equation, International Journal of Modern Physics A13, 315–362, 1998, [arXiv:hep-th/9703045 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  50. [51]

    Alekseev and S

    A. Alekseev and S. L. Shatashvili, Path integral quantization of the coadjoint orbits of the Virasoro group and 2d gravity, Nuclear Physics B323, 719–733, 1989

    1989

  51. [52]

    P. Gao, D. L. Jafferis and A. C. Wall, Traversable wormholes via a double trace deformation, JHEP12, 151, 2017, [arXiv:1608.05687 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [53]

    Maldacena and X.-L

    J. Maldacena and X.-L. Qi, Eternal traversable wormhole, 2018, [arXiv:1804.00491 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  53. [54]

    Radnell and E

    D. Radnell and E. Schippers, Quasisymmetric sewing in rigged Teichm¨ uller space, Communications in Contemporary Mathematics8, 481–534, 2006, [arXiv:math-ph/0507031 [math-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  54. [55]

    Maibach and E

    S. Maibach and E. Peltola, Complex deformations of the circle: Group cohomology and Virasoro uniformization, 2026, [arXiv:2605.20175 [math-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  55. [56]

    Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Physical Review E50, 888–901, 1994

    M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Physical Review E50, 888–901, 1994

    1994

  56. [57]

    J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Phys. Rev. A43, 2046–2049, 1991

    2046

  57. [58]

    D’Alessio, Y

    L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, Adv. Phys.65, 239–362, 2016, [arXiv:1509.06411 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  58. [59]

    Kondo, Resistance minimum in dilute magnetic alloys, Progress of Theoretical Physics 32, 37–49, 1964

    J. Kondo, Resistance minimum in dilute magnetic alloys, Progress of Theoretical Physics 32, 37–49, 1964

    1964

  59. [60]

    Erdmenger, C

    J. Erdmenger, C. Hoyos, A. O’Bannon and J. Wu, A holographic model of the kondo effect, JHEP12, 086, 2013, [arXiv:1310.3271 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  60. [61]

    Erdmenger, M

    J. Erdmenger, M. Flory, M.-N. Newrzella, M. Strydom and J. M. S. Wu, Quantum quenches in a holographic kondo model, JHEP04, 045, 2017, [arXiv:1612.06860 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  61. [62]

    Drukker and S

    N. Drukker and S. Kawamoto, Small deformations of supersymmetric wilson loops and open spin-chains, JHEP07, 024, 2006, [arXiv:hep-th/0604124]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  62. [63]

    Cooke, A

    M. Cooke, A. Dekel and N. Drukker, The wilson loop cft: insertion dimensions and structure constants from wavy lines, J. Phys. A50, 335401, 2017, [arXiv:1703.03812 [hep-th]]. 90

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  63. [64]

    Giombi and S

    S. Giombi and S. Komatsu, Exact correlators on the wilson loop inN= 4 sym: Localization, defect cft, and integrability, JHEP05, 109, 2018, [arXiv:1802.05201 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  64. [65]

    Liendo, C

    P. Liendo, C. Meneghelli and V. Mitev, Bootstrapping the half-bps line defect, JHEP10, 077, 2018, [arXiv:1806.01862 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  65. [66]

    Giombi, R

    S. Giombi, R. Roiban and A. A. Tseytlin, Half-bps wilson loop andads 2/cf t1, Nucl. Phys. B922, 499–527, 2017, [arXiv:1706.00756 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  66. [67]

    Correa, J

    D. Correa, J. Henn, J. Maldacena and A. Sever, An exact formula for the radiation of a moving quark inN= 4 super yang mills, JHEP06, 048, 2012, [arXiv:1202.4455 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  67. [68]

    Bianchi, M

    L. Bianchi, M. Lemos and M. Meineri, Line defects and radiation inN= 2 conformal theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 141601, 2018, [arXiv:1805.04111 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  68. [69]

    Barrat, B

    J. Barrat, B. Fiol, E. Marchetto, A. Miscioscia and E. Pomoni, Conformal line defects at finite temperature, SciPost Phys.18, 018, 2025, [arXiv:2407.14600 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  69. [70]

    Giombi, Y.-Z

    S. Giombi, Y.-Z. Li and J. Shan, Bouncing singularities and thermal correlators on line defects, 2026, [arXiv:2603.11012 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  70. [71]

    Antonini, M

    S. Antonini, M. Sasieta and B. Swingle, Cosmology from random entanglement, JHEP11, 188, 2023, [arXiv:2307.14416 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  71. [72]

    Antonini and P

    S. Antonini and P. Rath, Do holographic CFT states have unique semiclassical bulk duals?, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D34, 2544025, 2025, [arXiv:2408.02720 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  72. [73]

    Antonini, P

    S. Antonini, P. Rath, M. Sasieta, B. Swingle and A. Vilar L´ opez, The baby universe is fine and the CFT knows it: on holography for closed universes, JHEP12, 159, 2025, [arXiv:2507.10649 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  73. [74]

    Kudler-Flam and E

    J. Kudler-Flam and E. Witten, Emergent mixed states for baby universes and black holes, JHEP05, 090, 2026, [arXiv:2510.06376 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2026

  74. [75]

    Liu, ”Filtering” CFTs at large N: Euclidean Wormholes, Closed Universes, and Black Hole Interiors, 2025, [arXiv:2512.13807 [hep-th]]

    H. Liu, ”Filtering” CFTs at large N: Euclidean Wormholes, Closed Universes, and Black Hole Interiors, 2025, [arXiv:2512.13807 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2025

  75. [76]

    On the hilbert space of quantum gravity from the gravitational path integral

    L. V. Iliesiu, “On the hilbert space of quantum gravity from the gravitational path integral.” Talk at the workshop “Quantum Aspects of Black Holes and Spacetime,” Institute for Advanced Study, 2025

    2025

  76. [77]

    Di Ubaldo, L

    G. Di Ubaldo, L. V. Iliesiu, H. W. Lin and C. Yan, Positivity of the gravitational path integral implies the axionic weak gravity conjecture, 2026, [arXiv:2605.05305 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  77. [78]

    Meineri, J

    M. Meineri, J. Penedones and A. Rousset, Colliders and conformal interfaces, JHEP02, 138, 2020, [arXiv:1904.10974 [hep-th]]. 91

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  78. [79]

    Bachas and Z

    C. Bachas and Z. Chen, Invariant tensions from holography, JHEP08, 028, 2024, [arXiv:2404.14998 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  79. [80]

    Bachas, S

    C. Bachas, S. Chapman, D. Ge and G. Policastro, Energy reflection and transmission at 2D holographic interfaces, Physical Review Letters125, 231602, 2020, [arXiv:2006.11333 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  80. [81]

    Bachas and V

    C. Bachas and V. Papadopoulos, Phases of holographic interfaces, JHEP04, 262, 2021, [arXiv:2101.12529 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.