Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 139 references

Gluonic nucleon energy correlators and fracture functions for Color Glass Condensate

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that gluonic energy correlators reduce to two dipole-determined components and that their cos 2φ asymmetry is a saturation-sensitive observable at the EIC.

desk verdict A solid analytic CGC calculation of gluonic NECs and fracture functions with a genuinely new observable, but the numerics rest on an untested small-x convolution approximation. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.10955 v1 pith:O7OFPGKV submitted 2026-08-11 hep-ph nucl-th

Heikki Mäntysaari , Yu Shi , Yossathorn Tawabutr , Xuan-Bo Tong This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phnucl-th
keywords nucleonenergycorrelatorsfracturefunctionsColorGlassCondensatesmall-xgluonsaturationlinearlypolarizedgluonstargetfragmentationregioncos2φazimuthalasymmetryElectron-IonCollider
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper derives gluonic nucleon energy correlators (NECs) and fracture functions from their operator definitions within the Color Glass Condensate effective theory, a high-energy description of dense gluonic matter, at eikonal accuracy. It finds that for an unpolarized target only two gluon components survive at this order—the unpolarized $f_1^g$ and the linearly polarized $h_1^{t,g}$—and that both are completely fixed by the adjoint dipole $S$-matrix. It then shows that $h_1^{t,g}$ produces a $\cos 2\phi$ azimuthal modulation of the DIS energy pattern in the target fragmentation region, with magnitude set by the ratio of $h_1^{t,g}$ to the unpolarized quark NEC $f_1^q$. Because this ratio compares an adjoint-dipole quantity to a fundamental-dipole quantity, the paper argues the asymmetry is especially sensitive to the saturation scale, and it predicts a sizable nuclear suppression in $e{+}A$ relative to $e{+}p$ collisions at the future Electron-Ion Collider.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the adjoint dipole $S$-matrix $S_{x_g}(\mathbf{r}_\perp,\mathbf{b}_\perp)=\frac{1}{N_c^2-1}\langle \mathrm{Tr}[U(\mathbf{b}_\perp+\mathbf{r}_\perp/2)U^\dagger(\mathbf{b}_\perp-\mathbf{r}_\perp/2)]\rangle_{x_g}$ and its Fourier transform, the gluon dipole distribution $F_{x_g}(\mathbf{k}_{g\perp})$. The reality and $C$-evenness of this $S$-matrix is the mechanism that eliminates all spin-dependent gluon components at eikonal order, leaving $f_1^g$ and $h_1^{t,g}$. The derivation uses CGC shockwave amplitudes for a real gluon emitted before and after the target, whose squares and interference form the three diagrams of Fig. 5; only the interference diagram feeds $h_1^{t,g}$. The fracture functions are then converted into NECs by the inclusive energy sum rule, and the observable asymmetry is built from the ratio in Eq. (4.14), which isolates the dipole-size dependence.

What would settle it

A direct evaluation of the $z$-convolution in Eq. (4.12) using the computed $h_1^{t,g}(z,\theta)$ from Eq. (3.34), without the small-$x$ substitution, would show whether the predicted $\cos 2\phi$ asymmetry and its nuclear suppression survive; alternatively, at the EIC, measuring $\langle\cos 2\phi\rangle$ in $e{+}p$ and $e{+}Au$ at $x_B = 5\times10^{-3}$, $Q^2=25\,\mathrm{GeV}^2$ and finding $R_{eA} \ge 1$ in the small-$\theta$ region would contradict the central prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At eikonal accuracy the gluon dipole $S$-matrix is real and $C$-even, which forces all target-spin-dependent gluon components of NECs and fracture functions to vanish; only the two components of an unpolarized target, $f_1^g$ and $h_1^{t,g}$, survive. Both are expressed through the adjoint dipole gluon distribution $F_{x_g}(k_{g\perp})$, the Fourier transform of the adjoint dipole $S$-matrix, with $h_1^{t,g}$ receiving contributions only from the interference of the two CGC emission amplitudes. The inclusive energy sum rule converts the resulting fracture functions into the NECs of Eqs. (3.30) and (3.34), and in the dilute large-$\theta$ limit both recover the collinear gluon-splitting results with $1/\theta^2$ scaling. The phenomenological claim is Eq. (4.14): at leading order in $\alpha_s$ and small $x_B$, the $\cos 2\phi$ asymmetry of the TFR energy pattern is $-\frac{\alpha_s}{2\pi}\frac{T_F}{3}\frac{B(y)}{A(y)}$ times the ratio of $\sum_{q,\bar q} e_q^2 x_B h_1^{t,g}(x_B,\theta)$ to $\sum_{q,\bar q} e_q^2 x_B f_1^q(x_B,\theta)$. The numerical study at $x_B=5\times10^{-3}$, $Q^2=25\,\mathrm{GeV}^2$ finds this asymmetry negative, growing in magnitude with $\theta$, and strongly suppressed in $e{+}\mathrm{Au}$ relative to $e{+}p$.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical prediction for the asymmetry and its nuclear suppression depends on the approximation in Eq. (4.13) that replaces the integral over $z$ of $z h_1^{t,g}(z,\theta)$ by $x_B h_1^{t,g}(x_B,\theta)$, and on the hand-picked nuclear saturation scale range $3 Q_{s0}^2 < Q_{s0A}^2 < 5 Q_{s0}^2$; if these are not accurate, the magnitude and $\theta$-dependence of the predicted $\cos 2\phi$ asymmetry could shift substantially.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Across the $\theta$ range, $f_1^g$ shows almost no nuclear suppression while $h_1^{t,g}$ and $f_1^q$ are suppressed, so the asymmetry's suppression is a cleaner saturation signal than the gluon NEC alone.
  • Because the asymmetry is a single-inclusive calorimetric energy flow, it can be measured without jet reconstruction or particle identification, and it avoids Sudakov suppression in contrast to TMD dijet asymmetries.
  • The predicted $R_{eA}<1$, most pronounced at small $\theta$ where $\theta Q \lesssim Q_s$, gives a concrete EIC signature for the onset of gluon saturation.
  • In the dilute limit both gluon NECs match the collinear splitting kernels with $1/\theta^2$ scaling, connecting the CGC result to the established collinear framework.
  • Together with the quark-sector NEC results, the gluon-sector calculation completes a unified eikonal-level tomography framework for the target fragmentation region at small $x$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the ratio form of the asymmetry means its nuclear suppression is largely insensitive to absolute normalization uncertainties in the dipole models, so even a first EIC measurement with moderate statistics could distinguish saturated from unsaturated dipole inputs.
  • Beyond the paper: the accuracy of the predicted $\theta$-dependence rests on the untested replacement of the $z$-convolution in Eq. (4.13); numerically evaluating the exact convolution using Eq. (3.34) would be a decisive check of the quantitative claims.
  • Beyond the paper: the same adjoint-to-fundamental-dipole ratio structure should control $\cos 2\phi$ energy-pattern asymmetries in forward proton-nucleus collisions, where the target is gluon-dominated; the formalism developed here appears directly adaptable to that case.
  • Beyond the paper: since the vanishing of target-spin gluon NECs follows from the reality of the eikonal adjoint $S$-matrix, subeikonal corrections that introduce imaginary $C$-odd structures are the natural place to find the first nonzero spin-dependent gluon NECs, a direction the paper itself flags.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper computes leading-twist gluonic nucleon energy correlators (NECs) and fracture functions in the Color Glass Condensate effective theory at eikonal accuracy, starting from operator definitions. It finds that for an unpolarized target only the unpolarized gluon NEC f_1^g and the linearly polarized gluon NEC h_1^{t,g} survive, and both are expressed in terms of the adjoint dipole S-matrix (Eqs. (3.30) and (3.34)). The dilute limit is matched to collinear splitting results (Sec. 3.2.3 and Appendix A), and the unpolarized gluon jet fracture function is matched to Ref. [117] (Sec. 3.2.4). The paper then proposes a cos 2φ azimuthal asymmetry of the TFR DIS energy pattern, given by Eq. (4.14), and presents numerical predictions for EIC kinematics using rcBK dipole evolution. The predicted asymmetry is negative, grows with θ, and shows a sizable nuclear suppression in e+A relative to e+p collisions.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a substantial step in extending CGC-based TFR physics to the gluon sector. The analytic core is credible: the derivation is based on operator definitions, the reduction to two unpolarized-target components is physically sensible, and the cross-checks in Secs. 3.2.3, 3.2.4, and Appendix A provide nontrivial support. The proposed cos 2φ asymmetry is well motivated and, unlike TMD-based dijet asymmetries, is formulated in collinear factorization, so it is not affected by Sudakov suppression. The analytic matrix elements contain no adjustable parameters; the numerical inputs are the rcBK dipole parameters from a HERA fit. The main weakness is that the quantitative predictions in Sec. 4 rest on an untested endpoint approximation for the z-convolution, which directly affects the magnitude, θ-dependence, and nuclear suppression of the headline observable.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 4.2-4.3, Eqs. (4.12)-(4.14)] The step from Eq. (4.12) to Eq. (4.13) replaces the z-convolution by the endpoint value x_B h_1^{t,g}(x_B,θ). This is presented as a small-x approximation, but no derivation or error estimate is given. The function h_1^{t,g}(z,θ) computed from Eq. (3.34) has a nontrivial z-dependence through ε_f^2=(x/ξ)p_⊥^2 and through the dipole S_{x_g}, and the kernel x_B^3/z^4 in the convolution does not automatically make the endpoint replacement exact. Since Eq. (4.14) and all of Fig. 12 inherit this approximation, the predicted magnitude of ⟨cos 2φ⟩ and its nuclear suppression R_eA are not quantitatively established until the full convolution is evaluated or a controlled estimate of the truncation error is provided.
  2. [Sec. 4.3, Eqs. (3.34), (3.38), and (4.12)] The x_g prescription in the convolution is underspecified. The text states that the authors follow Ref. [103] and choose x_g=x_B, but Eq. (4.12) requires h_1^{t,g}(z,θ) for z>x_B, and Eq. (3.34) depends on x_g through θ(x_g-ξ) and through S_{x_g}. If one literally uses x_g=x_B for all z, the kinematic constraint in Eq. (3.34) becomes z-independent, which is inconsistent with the dilute-limit identification x_g=x/z used in Eq. (3.38). The authors should specify how x_g is assigned for z>x_B and show the sensitivity of the numerical results to this choice.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (3.35)] The Taylor expansion in Eq. (3.35) contains corrupted and unreadable symbols in the derivative terms; the expression needs to be cleaned up.
  2. [Eq. (3.34)] There appears to be an unbalanced bracket in the curly-brace expression around "p_⊥·k_g⊥)]][ε_f^2+..."; this should be corrected.
  3. [Eq. (2.8)] The integration measure in Eq. (2.8) is garbled: "dP+ h⊥d2Ph⊥" should presumably be dP_h^+ d^2P_h⊥, consistent with the other formulas.
  4. [Sec. 3.2.4 title] The section title contains a typo: "F racture function" should be "Fracture function".
  5. [Sec. 5] The paper correctly notes in Sec. 5 that a direct derivation of the TFR factorization from the full CGC cross section remains to be done; it would be helpful to state this caveat also in Sec. 4.2, where the factorization formula is used for the saturation-sensitive region.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the CGC results are derived from operator definitions, and the numerical asymmetry, while input-dependent, does not assume its own conclusion.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation starts from the operator definition of the gluonic NEC/fracture function matrix (Eqs. (2.2)/(2.9)), computes the shockwave amplitudes in Sec. 3.1, and projects onto the unpolarized and linearly polarized gluon components, obtaining Eqs. (3.30) and (3.34) in terms of the adjoint dipole S-matrix. The only framework inputs are the operator definitions themselves and the standard sum rule relating NECs to fracture functions, which is cited to Ref. [79]; that citation is not load-bearing for the new CGC calculation, and the sum rule is independently established. The cos 2phi asymmetry formula (4.14) follows from the previously factorized energy-pattern structure functions (Eqs. (4.8)-(4.12)) combined with the newly computed h1^{t,g}; no step redefines the asymmetry as its own input. The numerical analysis uses the HERA-fitted rcBK dipole and a chosen range 3Q_s0^2 < Q_s0A^2 < 5Q_s0^2; this makes the magnitude of the nuclear suppression input-dependent, but it is an open model parameter, not a quantity fitted to the predicted observable. The paper itself flags the main limitation in Sec. 5: 'To fully establish the consistency between CGC and collinear factorization in the TFR, it would also be important to derive the result directly from the full CGC cross section' — a correctness/completeness caveat, not evidence of circularity. Likewise, the replacement z h1^{t,g}(z,theta) -> x_B h1^{t,g}(x_B,theta) in Eq. (4.13) is an uncontrolled small-x approximation that could affect the numerical size and theta-shape of the predicted suppression, but an uncontrolled approximation is not circular reasoning. No load-bearing reduction of the paper's claims to its inputs was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities. Its numerical predictions rest on external HERA fit parameters (AAMQS), a hand-chosen nuclear saturation scale Q_s0A, a large-N_c identification, and a small-x approximation of the convolution; none of these are circular, but they delimit the strength of the prediction.

free parameters (6)
  • Q_s0 (proton initial saturation scale) = 0.16 GeV^2
    External fit parameter from AAMQS [131], adopted as input, not fitted in this paper.
  • gamma (anomalous dimension in initial condition) = 1.118
    External fit parameter from AAMQS [131], used in Eq. (4.16).
  • Lambda (QCD scale in initial condition) = 0.24 GeV
    External fit parameter from AAMQS [131], used in Eq. (4.16).
  • sigma0 (effective proton transverse area) = 33.105 mb
    External fit parameter from AAMQS [131], used via pi R_p^2 = sigma0/2.
  • Q_s0A (nuclear initial saturation scale) = 3 Q_s0^2 to 5 Q_s0^2 (chosen range)
    Chosen by hand in Sec. 4.3; the predicted nuclear suppression of the asymmetry depends directly on this choice.
  • x_g (CGC separation scale) = x_B
    Scale choice following Ref. [103]; affects the normalization of the NECs and the numerical results.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption CGC eikonal approximation with shockwave background and Wilson lines
    Used throughout Sec. 3; valid at high energy with P+ to infinity, but subeikonal corrections are neglected and could affect spin-dependent components.
  • domain assumption Large-N_c approximation: adjoint dipole S-matrix approximated as square of fundamental dipole
    Invoked in Sec. 4.3, Eq. (4.15), for the numerical analysis; this is an approximation not exact for finite N_c.
  • ad hoc to paper Small-x replacement z h_1^{t,g}(z,theta) -> x_B h_1^{t,g}(x_B,theta) in the convolution
    Used to go from Eq. (4.12) to (4.13); not justified by a numerical comparison and directly shapes the predicted asymmetry.
  • domain assumption TFR factorization of the DIS energy pattern at leading power in 1/Q
    Adopted from Collins [73] and Ref. [79]; the paper relies on this factorization to write Eq. (4.7).
  • standard math Energy sum rule relating NECs and fracture functions
    Takes the correspondence from Ref. [79]; used to convert fracture function results to NECs in Sec. 2.
  • domain assumption Only eikonal contributions survive; all target-spin-dependent gluon components vanish because the adjoint dipole S-matrix is real and C-even
    Argued in Sec. 3.2; relies on the reality of the eikonal gluon dipole, but subeikonal corrections are not computed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gluonic nucleon energy correlators and fracture functions for Color Glass Condensate." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O7OFPGKV

@misc{pith2026260810955,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gluonic nucleon energy correlators and fracture functions for Color Glass Condensate},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O7OFPGKV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.10955}
}
abstract

Nucleon energy correlators (NECs) and fracture functions provide novel tools for probing nucleon and nuclear structure at small $x$ through measurements in the target fragmentation region (TFR) of deep inelastic scattering (DIS). We investigate gluonic NECs and fracture functions using the Color Glass Condensate effective theory at eikonal accuracy. We find that only the unpolarized and linearly polarized gluon components in an unpolarized target are nonvanishing at this order, and that both are determined by the adjoint dipole $S$-matrix. Furthermore, we show that the linearly polarized gluonic NEC $h_{1}^{t,g}$ generates a characteristic $\cos 2\phi$ azimuthal asymmetry in the DIS energy pattern in the TFR. Unlike analogous observables in the current fragmentation region, this asymmetry is governed by the ratio of the linearly polarized gluon NEC $h_{1}^{t,g}$ to the unpolarized quark NEC $f_{1}^{q}$, making it particularly sensitive to the saturation scale. Our numerical analysis shows that this asymmetry exhibits substantial nuclear suppression, providing a novel window into the onset of gluon saturation at the future Electron-Ion Collider.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

139 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [117]

    Caucal and F

    P. Caucal and F. Salazar,Transverse momentum dependent factorisation in the target fragmentation region at smallx,2502.02634

    arXiv

  2. [103]

    H.-Y. Liu, X. Liu, J.-C. Pan, F. Yuan and H.X. Zhu,Nucleon Energy Correlators for the Color Glass Condensate,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 181901 [2301.01788]

    arXiv 2023

  3. [1]

    Accardi et al.,Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier: Understanding the glue that binds us all,Eur

    A. Accardi et al.,Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier: Understanding the glue that binds us all,Eur. Phys. J. A52(2016) 268 [1212.1701]

    arXiv 2016

  4. [2]

    Aschenauer, S

    E.C. Aschenauer, S. Fazio, J.H. Lee, H. Mantysaari, B.S. Page, B. Schenke et al.,The electron–ion collider: assessing the energy dependence of key measurements,Rept. Prog. Phys.82(2019) 024301 [1708.01527]

    arXiv 2019

  5. [3]

    Abdul Khalek et al.,Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report,Nucl

    R. Abdul Khalek et al.,Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report,Nucl. Phys. A1026(2022) 122447 [2103.05419]. – 30 –

    arXiv 2022

  6. [4]

    Abir et al.,The case for an EIC Theory Alliance: Theoretical Challenges of the EIC, 2305.14572

    R. Abir et al.,The case for an EIC Theory Alliance: Theoretical Challenges of the EIC, 2305.14572

    arXiv

  7. [5]

    Iancu and R

    E. Iancu and R. Venugopalan,The Color glass condensate and high-energy scattering in QCD, inQuark-gluon plasma 4, R.C. Hwa and X.-N. Wang, eds., pp. 249–3363 (2003), DOI [hep-ph/0303204]

    arXiv 2003

  8. [6]

    Gelis, E

    F. Gelis, E. Iancu, J. Jalilian-Marian and R. Venugopalan,The Color Glass Condensate, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60(2010) 463 [1002.0333]

    arXiv 2010

Show all 139 references
  1. [7]

    Kovchegov and E

    Y.V. Kovchegov and E. Levin,Quantum Chromodynamics at High Energy, vol. 33, Oxford University Press (2013), 10.1017/9781009291446

    2013 doi

  2. [8]

    Morreale and F

    A. Morreale and F. Salazar,Mining for Gluon Saturation at Colliders,Universe7(2021) 312 [2108.08254]

    2021 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Marquet, B.-W

    C. Marquet, B.-W. Xiao and F. Yuan,Semi-inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering at small x, Phys. Lett. B682(2009) 207 [0906.1454]

    2009 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Dominguez, B.-W

    F. Dominguez, B.-W. Xiao and F. Yuan,k t-factorization for Hard Processes in Nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett.106(2011) 022301 [1009.2141]

    2011 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Dominguez, C

    F. Dominguez, C. Marquet, B.-W. Xiao and F. Yuan,Universality of Unintegrated Gluon Distributions at small x,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 105005 [1101.0715]

    2011 arXiv

  6. [12]

    B.-W. Xiao, F. Yuan and J. Zhou,Transverse Momentum Dependent Parton Distributions at Small-x,Nucl. Phys. B921(2017) 104 [1703.06163]

    2017 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Kovchegov, D

    Y.V. Kovchegov, D. Pitonyak and M.D. Sievert,Helicity Evolution at Small-x,JHEP01 (2016) 072 [1511.06737]

    2016 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Kovchegov and M.D

    Y.V. Kovchegov and M.D. Sievert,Small-xHelicity Evolution: an Operator Treatment, Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 054032 [1808.09010]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Kovchegov and M.D

    Y.V. Kovchegov and M.D. Sievert,Valence Quark Transversity at Smallx,Phys. Rev. D 99(2019) 054033 [1808.10354]

    2019 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Cougoulic, Y.V

    F. Cougoulic, Y.V. Kovchegov, A. Tarasov and Y. Tawabutr,Quark and gluon helicity evolution at small x: revised and updated,JHEP07(2022) 095 [2204.11898]

    2022 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Adamiak, M.G

    D. Adamiak, M.G. Santiago and Y. Tawabutr,Small-x asymptotics of the leading-twist flavor-singlet quark TMDs,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 014023 [2412.14154]

    2026

  12. [18]

    Caucal, M.G

    P. Caucal, M.G. Morales, E. Iancu, F. Salazar and F. Yuan,Unveiling the sea: universality of the transverse momentum dependent quark distributions at small x,Phys. Lett. B874 (2026) 140271 [2503.16162]

    2026

  13. [19]

    Hatta, B.-W

    Y. Hatta, B.-W. Xiao and F. Yuan,Probing the Small-x Gluon Tomography in Correlated Hard Diffractive Dijet Production in Deep Inelastic Scattering,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 202301 [1601.01585]

    2016 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Hatta, B.-W

    Y. Hatta, B.-W. Xiao and F. Yuan,Gluon Tomography from Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering at Small-x,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 114026 [1703.02085]

    2017 arXiv

  15. [21]

    D. Boer, T. Van Daal, P.J. Mulders and E. Petreska,Directed flow from C-odd gluon correlations at smallx,JHEP07(2018) 140 [1805.05219]

    2018 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Bhattacharya, R

    S. Bhattacharya, R. Boussarie and Y. Hatta,Exploring orbital angular momentum and spin-orbit correlations for gluons at the Electron-Ion Collider,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 034019 [2404.04209]. – 31 –

    2025 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Kovchegov, M.G

    Y.V. Kovchegov, M.G. Santiago and H. Sun,Unpolarized GPDs at small x and non-zero skewness,Phys. Lett. B877(2026) 140470 [2512.10086]

    2026 arXiv

  18. [24]

    Bhattacharya, C.-Q

    S. Bhattacharya, C.-Q. He, Z.-B. Kang, D. Padilla and J. Penttala,Parton distributions in the shockwave formalism,JHEP04(2026) 079 [2510.02254]

    2026 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Kovchegov, M.G

    Y.V. Kovchegov, M.G. Santiago and H. Sun,On the TwoR-Factors in the Small-x Shockwave Formalism,2604.24629

    arXiv

  20. [26]

    Beni´ c, A

    S. Beni´ c, A. Dumitru, F. Hechenberger and T. Stebel,The eikonal spin-dependent Odderon and gluon Sivers function of a proton, and its small-x evolution,2603.09630

    arXiv

  21. [27]

    Fu, Z.-B

    Y. Fu, Z.-B. Kang, F. Salazar, X.-N. Wang and H. Xing,Correspondence between Color Glass Condensate and High-Twist Formalism,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 032301 [2310.12847]

    2025 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Hagiwara, X.-B

    Y. Hagiwara, X.-B. Tong and B.-W. Xiao,Understanding gravitational form factors with the Weizs¨ acker-Williams method,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) L051503 [2401.12840]

    2025 arXiv

  23. [29]

    Boussarie et al.,TMD Handbook,2304.03302

    R. Boussarie et al.,TMD Handbook,2304.03302

    arXiv

  24. [30]

    Boer, M.G

    D. Boer, M.G. Echevarria, P. Mulders and J. Zhou,Single spin asymmetries from a single Wilson loop,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 122001 [1511.03485]

    2016 arXiv

  25. [31]

    Dong, D.-X

    H. Dong, D.-X. Zheng and J. Zhou,Sea quark Sivers distribution,Phys. Lett. B788(2019) 401 [1805.09479]

    2019 arXiv

  26. [32]

    X. Yao, Y. Hagiwara and Y. Hatta,Computing the gluon Sivers function at small-x,Phys. Lett. B790(2019) 361 [1812.03959]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [33]

    Kovchegov and M.G

    Y.V. Kovchegov and M.G. Santiago,Quark sivers function at smallx: spin-dependent odderon and the sub-eikonal evolution,JHEP11(2021) 200 [2108.03667]

    2021 arXiv

  28. [34]

    Kovchegov and M.G

    Y.V. Kovchegov and M.G. Santiago,T-odd leading-twist quark TMDs at small x,JHEP11 (2022) 098 [2209.03538]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [35]

    Metz and J

    A. Metz and J. Zhou,Distribution of linearly polarized gluons inside a large nucleus,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 051503 [1105.1991]

    2011 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Dominguez, J.-W

    F. Dominguez, J.-W. Qiu, B.-W. Xiao and F. Yuan,On the linearly polarized gluon distributions in the color dipole model,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 045003 [1109.6293]

    2012 arXiv

  31. [37]

    Dumitru, T

    A. Dumitru, T. Lappi and V. Skokov,Distribution of Linearly Polarized Gluons and Elliptic Azimuthal Anisotropy in Deep Inelastic Scattering Dijet Production at High Energy, Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 252301 [1508.04438]

    2015 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Boer, P.J

    D. Boer, P.J. Mulders, C. Pisano and J. Zhou,Asymmetries in Heavy Quark Pair and Dijet Production at an EIC,JHEP08(2016) 001 [1605.07934]

    2016 arXiv

  33. [39]

    Mueller, B.-W

    A.H. Mueller, B.-W. Xiao and F. Yuan,Sudakov double logarithms resummation in hard processes in the small-x saturation formalism,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 114010 [1308.2993]

    2013 arXiv

  34. [40]

    Boer, P.J

    D. Boer, P.J. Mulders, J. Zhou and Y.-j. Zhou,Suppression of maximal linear gluon polarization in angular asymmetries,JHEP10(2017) 196 [1702.08195]

    2017 arXiv

  35. [41]

    Xiao and F

    B.-W. Xiao and F. Yuan,Non-Universality of Transverse Momentum Dependent Parton Distributions at Small-x,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 062001 [1003.0482]

    2010 arXiv

  36. [42]

    Xiao and F

    B.-W. Xiao and F. Yuan,Initial and Final State Interaction Effects in Small-x Quark Distributions,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 114009 [1008.4432]. – 32 –

    2010 arXiv

  37. [43]

    Caucal, E

    P. Caucal, E. Iancu, A.H. Mueller and F. Yuan,Jet Definition and Transverse-Momentum–Dependent Factorization in Semi-inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 061903 [2408.03129]

    2025 arXiv

  38. [44]

    Altinoluk, J

    T. Altinoluk, J. Jalilian-Marian and C. Marquet,Sudakov double logs in single-inclusive hadron production in DIS at smallxfrom the color glass condensate formalism,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 094056 [2406.08277]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [45]

    Altinoluk, G

    T. Altinoluk, G. Beuf and S. Mulani,Forward parton-nucleus scattering at next-to-eikonal accuracy in the color glass condensate,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 034028 [2411.15047]

    2025 arXiv

  40. [46]

    Dumitru and V

    A. Dumitru and V. Skokov,Cos(4 phi) azimuthal anisotropy in small-x DIS dijet production beyond the leading power TMD limit,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 014030 [1605.02739]

    2016 arXiv

  41. [47]

    Dumitru, V

    A. Dumitru, V. Skokov and T. Ullrich,Measuring the Weizs¨ acker-Williams distribution of linearly polarized gluons at an electron-ion collider through dijet azimuthal asymmetries, Phys. Rev. C99(2019) 015204 [1809.02615]

    2019 arXiv

  42. [48]

    Boussarie, H

    R. Boussarie, H. M¨ antysaari, F. Salazar and B. Schenke,The importance of kinematic twists and genuine saturation effects in dijet production at the Electron-Ion Collider,JHEP 09(2021) 178 [2106.11301]

    2021 arXiv

  43. [49]

    Caucal, F

    P. Caucal, F. Salazar, B. Schenke and R. Venugopalan,Back-to-back inclusive dijets in DIS at small x: Sudakov suppression and gluon saturation at NLO,JHEP11(2022) 169 [2208.13872]

    2022 arXiv

  44. [50]

    Caucal, F

    P. Caucal, F. Salazar, B. Schenke, T. Stebel and R. Venugopalan,Back-to-Back Inclusive Dijets in Deep Inelastic Scattering at Small x: Complete NLO Results and Predictions, Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 081902 [2308.00022]

    2024 arXiv

  45. [51]

    Altinoluk, G

    T. Altinoluk, G. Beuf, A. Czajka and C. Marquet,Back-to-back dijet production in DIS at next-to-eikonal accuracy and twist-3 gluon TMDs,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 014010 [2410.00612]

    2025 arXiv

  46. [52]

    Caucal, E

    P. Caucal, E. Iancu, F. Salazar and F. Yuan,Gluon splitting at small x: a unified derivation for the JIMWLK, DGLAP and CSS equations,JHEP03(2026) 198 [2510.08454]

    2026

  47. [53]

    Mukherjee, V.V

    S. Mukherjee, V.V. Skokov, A. Tarasov, S. Tiwari and F. Yao,Back-to-back dijet production in DIS at arbitrary Bjorken-x: TMD gluon distributions to twist-3 accuracy,2602.15137

  48. [54]

    Mukherjee, V.V

    S. Mukherjee, V.V. Skokov, A. Tarasov, S. Tiwari and F. Yao,Back-to-back dijet production in DIS at arbitrary Bjorken-x: TMD quark distributions to twist-3 accuracy,2607.12268

    arXiv

  49. [55]

    Tong, B.-W

    X.-B. Tong, B.-W. Xiao and Y.-Y. Zhang,Harmonics of Parton Saturation in Lepton-Jet Correlations at the Electron-Ion Collider,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 151902 [2211.01647]

    2023 arXiv

  50. [56]

    Tong, B.-W

    X.-B. Tong, B.-W. Xiao and Y.-Y. Zhang,Harmonics of lepton-jet correlations in inclusive and diffractive scatterings,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 054004 [2310.20662]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [57]

    Berger and A.M

    J. Berger and A.M. Stasto,Small x nonlinear evolution with impact parameter and the structure function data,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 094022 [1106.5740]

    2011 arXiv

  52. [58]

    Marquet, E

    C. Marquet, E. Petreska and C. Roiesnel,Transverse-momentum-dependent gluon distributions from JIMWLK evolution,JHEP10(2016) 065 [1608.02577]

    2016 arXiv

  53. [59]

    Marquet, C

    C. Marquet, C. Roiesnel and P. Taels,Linearly polarized small-xgluons in forward heavy-quark pair production,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 014004 [1710.05698]. – 33 –

    2018 arXiv

  54. [60]

    Stasto, S.-Y

    A. Stasto, S.-Y. Wei, B.-W. Xiao and F. Yuan,On the Dihadron Angular Correlations in ForwardpAcollisions,Phys. Lett. B784(2018) 301 [1805.05712]

    2018 arXiv

  55. [61]

    Albacete, G

    J.L. Albacete, G. Giacalone, C. Marquet and M. Matas,Forward dihadron back-to-back correlations inpAcollisions,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 014002 [1805.05711]

    2019 arXiv

  56. [62]

    Marquet, S.-Y

    C. Marquet, S.-Y. Wei and B.-W. Xiao,Probing parton saturation with forwardZ 0-boson production at small transverse momentum in p+p and p+A collisions,Phys. Lett. B802 (2020) 135253 [1909.08572]

    2020 arXiv

  57. [63]

    Altinoluk, N

    T. Altinoluk, N. Armesto, A. Kovner and M. Lublinsky,Single inclusive particle production at next-to-leading order in proton-nucleus collisions at forward rapidities: Hybrid approach meets TMD factorization,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 074003 [2307.14922]

    2023 arXiv

  58. [64]

    Altinoluk, G

    T. Altinoluk, G. Beuf, E. Blanco and S. Mulani,Quark TMDs from back-to-back dijet production at forward rapidities in pA collisions beyond eikonal accuracy in the CGC, JHEP06(2025) 097 [2412.08485]

    2025

  59. [65]

    Marquet, Y

    C. Marquet, Y. Shi and B.-W. Xiao,Unified Resummation of Soft Gluon Radiation in Heavy Meson Pair Photoproduction,2510.18949

  60. [66]

    Caucal, Z.-B

    P. Caucal, Z.-B. Kang, P. Korcyl, F. Salazar, B. Schenke, T. Stebel et al.,Probing gluon saturation with forward di-hadron correlations in proton-nucleus collisions,Phys. Lett. B 879(2026) 140599 [2512.21466]

    2026

  61. [67]

    Z. Gao, C. Marquet, Y. Shi and B.-W. Xiao,Probing Saturation Effect in Heavy Meson Pair Correlation in ForwardpACollisions,2605.01527

    arXiv

  62. [68]

    Boglione, J

    M. Boglione, J. Collins, L. Gamberg, J.O. Gonzalez-Hernandez, T.C. Rogers and N. Sato, Kinematics of Current Region Fragmentation in Semi-Inclusive Deeply Inelastic Scattering, Phys. Lett. B766(2017) 245 [1611.10329]

    2017 arXiv

  63. [69]

    Boglione, A

    M. Boglione, A. Dotson, L. Gamberg, S. Gordon, J.O. Gonzalez-Hernandez, A. Prokudin et al.,Mapping the Kinematical Regimes of Semi-Inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering,JHEP 10(2019) 122 [1904.12882]

    2019 arXiv

  64. [70]

    Trentadue and G

    L. Trentadue and G. Veneziano,Fracture functions: An Improved description of inclusive hard processes in QCD,Phys. Lett. B323(1994) 201

    1994

  65. [71]

    Berera and D.E

    A. Berera and D.E. Soper,Behavior of diffractive parton distribution functions,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 6162 [hep-ph/9509239]

    1996 arXiv

  66. [72]

    Grazzini, L

    M. Grazzini, L. Trentadue and G. Veneziano,Fracture functions from cut vertices,Nucl. Phys. B519(1998) 394 [hep-ph/9709452]

    1998 arXiv

  67. [73]

    Collins,Proof of factorization for diffractive hard scattering,Phys

    J.C. Collins,Proof of factorization for diffractive hard scattering,Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 3051 [hep-ph/9709499]

    1998 arXiv

  68. [74]

    Anselmino, V

    M. Anselmino, V. Barone and A. Kotzinian,SIDIS in the target fragmentation region: Polarized and transverse momentum dependent fracture functions,Phys. Lett. B699(2011) 108 [1102.4214]

    2011 arXiv

  69. [75]

    Chen, J.P

    K.B. Chen, J.P. Ma and X.B. Tong,Twist-3 contributions in semi-inclusive DIS in the target fragmentation region,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 094015 [2308.11251]

    2023 arXiv

  70. [76]

    Chen, J.-P

    K.-B. Chen, J.-P. Ma and X.-B. Tong,Gluonic contributions to semi-inclusive DIS in the target fragmentation region,JHEP05(2024) 298 [2402.15112]. – 34 –

    2024 arXiv

  71. [77]

    Liu and H.X

    X. Liu and H.X. Zhu,Nucleon Energy Correlators,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 091901 [2209.02080]

    2023 arXiv

  72. [78]

    H. Cao, X. Liu and H.X. Zhu,Toward precision measurements of nucleon energy correlators in lepton-nucleon collisions,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 114008 [2303.01530]

    2023 arXiv

  73. [79]

    Chen, J.-P

    K.-B. Chen, J.-P. Ma and X.-B. Tong,The connection between nucleon energy correlators and fracture functions,JHEP08(2024) 227 [2406.08559]

    2024 arXiv

  74. [80]

    Chai, K.B

    X.P. Chai, K.B. Chen, J.P. Ma and X.B. Tong,Fracture functions in different kinematic regions and their factorizations,JHEP10(2019) 285 [1903.00809]

    2019 arXiv

  75. [81]

    Chen, J.P

    K.B. Chen, J.P. Ma and X.B. Tong,Matching of fracture functions for SIDIS in target fragmentation region,JHEP11(2021) 038 [2108.13582]

    2021 arXiv

  76. [82]

    Anselmino, V

    M. Anselmino, V. Barone and A. Kotzinian,Double hadron lepto-production in the current and target fragmentation regions,Phys. Lett. B706(2011) 46 [1109.1132]

    2011 arXiv

  77. [83]

    Anselmino, V

    M. Anselmino, V. Barone and A. Kotzinian,A novel beam-spin asymmetry in double-hadron inclusive lepto-production,Phys. Lett. B713(2012) 317 [1112.2604]

    2012 arXiv

  78. [84]

    Guo and F

    Y. Guo and F. Yuan,Explore the Nucleon Tomography through Di-hadron Correlation in Opposite Hemisphere in Deep Inelastic Scattering,2312.01008

    arXiv

  79. [85]

    Zhao, Z.-t

    X. Zhao, Z.-t. Liang, T. Liu and Y.-j. Zhou,Suppression of Spin Transfer toΛin Deep Inelastic Scattering,2411.06205

    arXiv

  80. [86]

    Xi, K.-B

    X.-Q. Xi, K.-B. Chen, X.-B. Tong, S.-Y. Wei and J. Wu,Helicity correlation of dihadron in current and target fragmentation regions of unpolarized SIDIS,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1458 [2510.06103]

    2025

  81. [87]

    Hatta and O.V

    Y. Hatta and O.V. Teryaev,Single spin asymmetry ine+p→e ′+B ↑+X,2602.07682. [88]CLAScollaboration,Observation of Correlations between Spin and Transverse Momenta in Back-to-Back Dihadron Production at CLAS12,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 022501 [2208.05086]

    2023

  82. [89]

    Iancu, A.H

    E. Iancu, A.H. Mueller and D.N. Triantafyllopoulos,Probing Parton Saturation and the Gluon Dipole via Diffractive Jet Production at the Electron-Ion Collider,Phys. Rev. Lett. 128(2022) 202001 [2112.06353]

    2022 arXiv

  83. [90]

    Iancu, A.H

    E. Iancu, A.H. Mueller, D.N. Triantafyllopoulos and S.Y. Wei,Gluon dipole factorisation for diffractive dijets,JHEP10(2022) 103 [2207.06268]

    2022 arXiv

  84. [91]

    Hatta, B.-W

    Y. Hatta, B.-W. Xiao and F. Yuan,Semi-inclusive diffractive deep inelastic scattering at small x,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 094015 [2205.08060]

    2022 arXiv

  85. [92]

    Hatta and F

    Y. Hatta and F. Yuan,Angular dependence in transverse momentum dependent diffractive parton distributions at small-x,Phys. Lett. B854(2024) 138738 [2403.19609]

    2024 arXiv

  86. [93]

    D.Y. Shao, Y. Shi, C. Zhang, J. Zhou and Y.-j. Zhou,Revisiting azimuthal angular asymmetries in diffractive di-jet production,JHEP07(2024) 189 [2402.05465]

    2024 arXiv

  87. [94]

    Iancu, D.N

    E. Iancu, D.N. Triantafyllopoulos, S.Y. Wei and F. Yuan,The quantum evolutions of the diffractive transverse-momentum dependent gluon distribution,JHEP05(2026) 099 [2512.11730]

    2026

  88. [95]

    D.Y. Shao, Y. Shi, C. Zhang, J. Zhou and Y.-j. Zhou,Azimuthal decorrelation in diffractive dijet production,2606.02230. – 35 –

    arXiv

  89. [96]

    Caucal, P

    P. Caucal, P. Gimeno-Estivill, E. Iancu, T. Lappi and F. Salazar,TMD factorization in diffractive heavy-quark production in photon-nucleus collisions,2606.04169

    arXiv

  90. [97]

    de Florian and R

    D. de Florian and R. Sassot,Phenomenology of forward hadrons in DIS: Fracture functions and its Q**2 evolution,Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 426 [hep-ph/9703228]

    1997 arXiv

  91. [98]

    de Florian and R

    D. de Florian and R. Sassot,QCD analysis of diffractive and leading proton DIS structure functions in the framework of fracture functions,Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 054003 [hep-ph/9804240]

    1998 arXiv

  92. [99]

    Shoeibi, F

    S. Shoeibi, F. Taghavi-Shahri, H. Khanpour and K. Javidan,Phenomenology of leading nucleon production inepcollisions at HERA in the framework of fracture functions,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 074013 [1710.06329]

    2018 arXiv

  93. [100]

    Shoeibi, H

    S. Shoeibi, H. Khanpour, F. Taghavi-Shahri and K. Javidan,Determination of neutron fracture functions from a global QCD analysis of the leading neutron production at HERA, Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 074011 [1703.04369]

    2017 arXiv

  94. [101]

    Khanpour,Phenomenology of diffractive DIS in the framework of fracture functions and determination of diffractive parton distribution functions,Phys

    H. Khanpour,Phenomenology of diffractive DIS in the framework of fracture functions and determination of diffractive parton distribution functions,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 054007 [1902.10734]

    2019 arXiv

  95. [102]

    Moult and H.X

    I. Moult and H.X. Zhu,Energy Correlators: A Journey From Theory to Experiment, 2506.09119

    arXiv

  96. [104]

    M¨ antysaari, Y

    H. M¨ antysaari, Y. Tawabutr and X.-B. Tong,Nucleon energy correlators for the odderon, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 114027 [2503.20157]

    2025 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Cao, H.T

    H. Cao, H.T. Li and Z. Mi,Bjorken x weighted energy-energy correlators from the target fragmentation region to the current fragmentation region,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 096004 [2312.07655]

    2024 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Liu and H.X

    X. Liu and H.X. Zhu,TMDs from Semi-inclusive Energy Correlators,2403.08874

    arXiv

  99. [107]

    X.L. Li, X. Liu, F. Yuan and H.X. Zhu,Illuminating nucleon-gluon interference via calorimetric asymmetry,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) L091502 [2308.10942]

    2023 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Y. Guo, X. Liu, F. Yuan and H.X. Zhu,Long-Range Azimuthal Correlation, Entanglement, and Bell Inequality Violation by Spinning Gluons at the Large Hadron Collider,Research 2025(2025) 0552 [2406.05880]

    2025 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Y. Guo, X. Liu and F. Yuan,Long Range Energy-energy Correlator at the LHC, 2408.14693

    arXiv

  102. [110]

    Huang, X.-B

    Y. Huang, X.-B. Tong and H.-L. Wang,Nucleon Energy Correlators as a Probe of Light-Quark Dipole Operators at the Electron-Ion Collider,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) 131902 [2508.08516]

    2026 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Gao, H.T

    J. Gao, H.T. Li and Y.J. Zhu,Energy correlators resolving proton spin,Phys. Rev. D113 (2026) 034028 [2509.17596]

    2026 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Cao and F

    H. Cao and F. Petriello,The one-point charge correlator in deep inelastic scattering, 2606.27454

    arXiv

  105. [113]

    Meng, F.I

    R.-b. Meng, F.I. Olness and D.E. Soper,Semiinclusive deeply inelastic scattering at electron - proton colliders,Nucl. Phys. B371(1992) 79. – 36 –

    1992

  106. [114]

    Z.-B. Kang, R. Kao, M. Li and J. Penttala,One-point energy correlator for deep inelastic scattering at smallx,2603.02300

  107. [115]

    H.T. Li, Y. Makris and I. Vitev,Energy-energy correlators in Deep Inelastic Scattering, Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 094005 [2102.05669]

    2021 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Z.-B. Kang, K. Lee, D.Y. Shao and F. Zhao,Probing transverse momentum dependent structures with azimuthal dependence of energy correlators,JHEP03(2024) 153 [2310.15159]

    2024 arXiv

  109. [118]

    Hatta, B.-W

    Y. Hatta, B.-W. Xiao, F. Yuan and J. Zhou,Anisotropy in Dijet Production in Exclusive and Inclusive Processes,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 142001 [2010.10774]

    2021 arXiv

  110. [119]

    Hatta, B.-W

    Y. Hatta, B.-W. Xiao, F. Yuan and J. Zhou,Azimuthal angular asymmetry of soft gluon radiation in jet production,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 054037 [2106.05307]

    2021 arXiv

  111. [120]

    Sveshnikov and F.V

    N.A. Sveshnikov and F.V. Tkachov,Jets and quantum field theory,Phys. Lett. B382 (1996) 403 [hep-ph/9512370]

    1996 arXiv

  112. [121]

    Bauer, S.P

    C.W. Bauer, S.P. Fleming, C. Lee and G.F. Sterman,Factorization ofe +e− Event Shape Distributions with Hadronic Final States in Soft Collinear Effective Theory,Phys. Rev. D 78(2008) 034027 [0801.4569]

    2008 arXiv

  113. [122]

    Kovchegov and M

    Y.V. Kovchegov and M. Li,Weizs¨ acker-Williams gluon helicity distribution and inclusive dijet production in longitudinally polarized electron-proton collisions,JHEP08(2025) 206 [2504.12979]

    2025 arXiv

  114. [123]

    Kovchegov, D

    Y.V. Kovchegov, D. Pitonyak and M.D. Sievert,Small-xAsymptotics of the Gluon Helicity Distribution,JHEP10(2017) 198 [1706.04236]

    2017 arXiv

  115. [124]

    Nadolsky, C

    P.M. Nadolsky, C. Balazs, E.L. Berger and C.P. Yuan,Gluon-gluon contributions to the production of continuum diphoton pairs at hadron colliders,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 013008 [hep-ph/0702003]

    2007 arXiv

  116. [125]

    Catani and M

    S. Catani and M. Grazzini,QCD transverse-momentum resummation in gluon fusion processes,Nucl. Phys. B845(2011) 297 [1011.3918]

    2011 arXiv

  117. [126]

    Boer, S.J

    D. Boer, S.J. Brodsky, P.J. Mulders and C. Pisano,Direct Probes of Linearly Polarized Gluons inside Unpolarized Hadrons,Phys. Rev. Lett.106(2011) 132001 [1011.4225]

    2011 arXiv

  118. [127]

    Pisano, D

    C. Pisano, D. Boer, S.J. Brodsky, M.G.A. Buffing and P.J. Mulders,Linear polarization of gluons and photons in unpolarized collider experiments,JHEP10(2013) 024 [1307.3417]

    2013 arXiv

  119. [128]

    Sun, B.-W

    P. Sun, B.-W. Xiao and F. Yuan,Gluon Distribution Functions and Higgs Boson Production at Moderate Transverse Momentum,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 094005 [1109.1354]

    2011 arXiv

  120. [129]

    Gutierrez-Reyes, S

    D. Gutierrez-Reyes, S. Leal-Gomez, I. Scimemi and A. Vladimirov,Linearly polarized gluons at next-to-next-to leading order and the Higgs transverse momentum distribution, JHEP11(2019) 121 [1907.03780]

    2019 arXiv

  121. [130]

    Albacete and Y.V

    J.L. Albacete and Y.V. Kovchegov,Solving high energy evolution equation including running coupling corrections,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 125021 [0704.0612]

    2007 arXiv

  122. [131]

    Albacete, N

    J.L. Albacete, N. Armesto, J.G. Milhano, P. Quiroga-Arias and C.A. Salgado,AAMQS: A non-linear QCD analysis of new HERA data at small-x including heavy quarks,Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1705 [1012.4408]. – 37 –

    2011 arXiv

  123. [132]

    Balitsky,Operator expansion for high-energy scattering,Nucl

    I. Balitsky,Operator expansion for high-energy scattering,Nucl. Phys. B463(1996) 99 [hep-ph/9509348]

    1996 arXiv

  124. [133]

    Balitsky,Quark contribution to the small-x evolution of color dipole,Phys

    I. Balitsky,Quark contribution to the small-x evolution of color dipole,Phys. Rev. D75 (2007) 014001 [hep-ph/0609105]

    2007 arXiv

  125. [134]

    Balitsky and G.A

    I. Balitsky and G.A. Chirilli,Next-to-leading order evolution of color dipoles,Phys. Rev. D 77(2008) 014019 [0710.4330]

    2008 arXiv

  126. [135]

    Berger and A

    J. Berger and A. Stasto,Numerical solution of the nonlinear evolution equation at small x with impact parameter and beyond the LL approximation,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 034015 [1010.0671]

    2011 arXiv

  127. [136]

    Kovchegov and H

    Y.V. Kovchegov and H. Weigert,Quark loop contribution to BFKL evolution: Running coupling and leading-N(f ) NLO intercept,Nucl. Phys. A789(2007) 260 [hep-ph/0612071]

    2007 arXiv

  128. [137]

    Kovchegov,Small x F(2) structure function of a nucleus including multiple pomeron exchanges,Phys

    Y.V. Kovchegov,Small x F(2) structure function of a nucleus including multiple pomeron exchanges,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 034008 [hep-ph/9901281]

    1999 arXiv

  129. [138]

    Kovchegov and H

    Y.V. Kovchegov and H. Weigert,Triumvirate of Running Couplings in Small-x Evolution, Nucl. Phys. A784(2007) 188 [hep-ph/0609090]

    2007 arXiv

  130. [139]

    Gardi, J

    E. Gardi, J. Kuokkanen, K. Rummukainen and H. Weigert,Running coupling and power corrections in nonlinear evolution at the high-energy limit,Nucl. Phys. A784(2007) 282 [hep-ph/0609087]

    2007 arXiv

  131. [140]

    Golec-Biernat, L

    K.J. Golec-Biernat, L. Motyka and A.M. Stasto,Diffusion into infrared and unitarization of the BFKL pomeron,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 074037 [hep-ph/0110325]. – 38 –

    2002 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.