REVIEW 3 cited by
Why Tabular Foundation Models Should Be a Research Priority
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent text and image foundation models are incredibly impressive, and these models are attracting an ever-increasing portion of research resources. In this position piece we aim to shift the ML research community's priorities ever so slightly to a different modality: tabular data. Tabular data is the dominant modality in many fields, yet it is given hardly any research attention and significantly lags behind in terms of scale and power. We believe the time is now to start developing tabular foundation models, or what we coin a Large Tabular Model (LTM). LTMs could revolutionise the way science and ML use tabular data: not as single datasets that are analyzed in a vacuum, but contextualized with respect to related datasets. The potential impact is far-reaching: from few-shot tabular models to automating data science; from out-of-distribution synthetic data to empowering multidisciplinary scientific discovery. We intend to excite reflections on the modalities we study, and convince some researchers to study large tabular models.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Basis Transformers for Multi-Task Tabular Regression
Basis transformers beat fine-tuned LLMs on 34 multi-task tabular regression datasets while using five times fewer parameters and no data preprocessing.
-
Topological Signatures of Context-Level Reliability in TabPFN
Fragmentation of TabPFN's internal representation topology (H0 zigzag homology) strongly tracks calibration error and Bayes-label disagreement across a six-family synthetic benchmark, with a scale-invariant 'scissors'...
-
MultiTab: A Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Multi-Dimensional Evaluation in Tabular Domains
A regime-stratified benchmark of 196 tabular datasets shows that model rankings depend strongly on dataset characteristics such as sample size, feature correlation, and label imbalance.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.