Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 152 references

Functional renormalization of QCD in $1 + 1$ dimensions: four-fermion interactions from quark-gluon dynamics

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper presents the first functional renormalization group study of QCD in two spacetime dimensions, derives flow equations for the gauge coupling, quark mass, and a Fierz-complete set of local four-fermion interactions, and finds…

desk verdict A genuine first FRG treatment of QCD2 with a Fierz-complete four-fermion basis and honest caveats; the main weaknesses are auditability and regulator dependence of the bound-state signal, not hidden errors. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.16051 v2 pith:OVB3CSOH submitted 2024-12-20 hep-ph hep-thnucl-th

Eric Oevermann , Adrian Koenigstein , Stefan Floerchinger This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-thnucl-th
keywords two-dimensionalQCDfunctionalrenormalizationgroupfour-fermioninteractionsFierzcompletenessCallan-SymanzikregulatorboundstatestHooftmodellargecolorlimit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Two-dimensional QCD has confinement but no propagating gluons, making it a controlled laboratory for the nonperturbative mechanisms behind real QCD. The paper's goal is to see those mechanisms emerge from the functional renormalization group rather than from an exact solution. It derives the coupled scale-dependence of the gauge coupling, the quark mass, and the complete set of local four-fermion interactions generated by quark-gluon dynamics. The flows drive these couplings to infinity at a finite infrared scale, and the paper reads that divergence as the first sign of mesonic bound-state formation. A sympathetic reader should care because this is a systematic first step toward computing the bound-state spectrum of two-dimensional QCD from first principles.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the exact functional renormalization group flow equation for the scale-dependent effective action, equipped with a Callan-Symanzik-type regulator that acts as a momentum-independent mass term for gluons, quarks, and ghosts. This regulator keeps the Ward-Takahashi identity unmodified and makes the two-dimensional flow computations tractable. For the fermion sector the paper uses a Fierz-complete basis: with one flavor, the nine naively written local four-fermion couplings collapse to three algebraically independent channels, chosen as scalar, pseudoscalar, and vector. The Fierz reduction is what turns an overcomplete ansatz into a closed system of flow equations.

What would settle it

Recompute the same flows with a momentum-dependent regulator and with momentum-dependent four-fermion vertices; if the couplings stop diverging at a finite scale, the divergence is an artifact of the truncation. Also bosonize the divergent channels and check whether the would-be meson masses vanish exactly at the divergence scale, as the bound-state interpretation implies.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that a simple momentum-independent Callan-Symanzik-type regulator makes two-dimensional QCD a well-defined functional renormalization group problem while preserving the Ward-Takahashi and Nielsen identities. Within the minimal truncation, the gauge coupling grows toward the infrared and diverges at a finite scale, which the paper takes as the signal that the truncation must be extended. Extending the truncation by a Fierz-complete basis of local four-fermion interactions—an algebraically complete set of interaction channels—the paper finds that gauge fluctuations generate all interaction channels and that the couplings run to infinity at a scale of order the bare gauge coupling, whether or not the gauge coupling itself has already diverged. The stated interpretation is that this divergence is a first signal for the formation of bound states and indicates which channels partial bosonization should resolve.

Load-bearing premise

The infrared story rests on the assumption that the severely truncated effective action—only local, momentum-independent couplings plus this particular regulator—faithfully represents the true dynamics at the scales where the couplings diverge; the paper itself flags that the divergence may signal the breakdown of the truncation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At the scale where the gauge coupling diverges, the simple truncation breaks down, so the divergence is a trigger for including higher-order vertices or partial bosonization rather than a prediction of singular physical observables.
  • With one flavor, only three local four-fermion channels are algebraically independent, and for massless quarks chiral symmetry reduces that to two; this fixes the minimal field content for future bound-state studies.
  • For finite flavor number and massive quarks the gauge coupling always diverges toward the infrared, whereas in the infinite-flavor limit the flow reaches zero scale in a weakly coupled regime.
  • With the gauge coupling switched off, the purely fermionic system either flows to a fixed point or to a divergence, and the diverging case is the one reached from QCD-like initial conditions.
  • The regulator breaks chiral symmetry explicitly, but the purely fermionic four-fermion flow preserves the condition that makes the scalar and pseudoscalar interactions form a chirally symmetric combination once it is imposed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A quantitative test of the bound-state reading would be to compare the divergence scale of the four-fermion couplings with the lightest meson mass in the exact large-color limit; agreement would tie the truncation's singularity to a physical spectrum.
  • The same regulator scheme could be applied to two-dimensional QCD with adjoint quarks, whose infrared is deconfining; whether the four-fermion channels still diverge there would help separate confining dynamics from the mere generation of fermion self-interactions.
  • Because the momentum-independent regulator preserves the Ward-Takahashi identity in this setting, the method may extend to super-renormalizable gauge theories with chemical potentials or backgrounds, where a mass-like infrared cutoff is simpler to control than frequency-dependent regulators.
  • If the divergence is physical, partial bosonization in two dimensions should turn each divergent channel into a light boson with a computable mass, giving a direct renormalization-group route into the meson spectrum that could be checked against independent computations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a functional renormalization group (FRG) description of massive QCD in 1+1 dimensions, starting from the Euclidean path integral with background-field gauge fixing and a local Callan–Symanzik-type regulator. It derives flow equations for the gauge coupling, quark mass, and a Fierz-complete set of local four-fermion interactions, and studies their qualitative behavior in the UV, in the IR, in the purely fermionic limit, and in large-Nc and large-Nf limits. The authors emphasize that the truncation is minimal and that several divergences signal a breakdown of the approximation, but they propose that the divergence of four-fermion couplings can be interpreted as a first signal for bound state formation.

Significance. If the results hold, this is the first FRG treatment of QCD in two dimensions and provides a concrete starting point for a nonperturbative analysis of a confining gauge theory with a Fierz-complete local four-fermion sector. The paper has clear strengths: the flow equations are derived from the Wetterich equation without fitted parameters, the UV flow of the gauge coupling correctly reduces to the perturbative one-loop result, the pure fermion limit reproduces known Gross–Neveu-type flow equations, and the calculations are cross-checked with two independent projection methods and supplemented by a detailed Master's thesis. However, the central physical interpretation as a precursor of bound states rests on truncation- and regulator-sensitive divergences, and the manuscript does not yet quantify how robust those divergences are. The paper is therefore a useful and largely sound first step, but the headline claim needs additional support.

major comments (4)
  1. [§VI.D.3 and §VI.E] The four-fermion divergences that are interpreted as bound-state signals in Sec. VIII are computed exclusively with the Callan–Symanzik regulator. Section VI.E explicitly shows that the Litim regulator changes the flow of λ3 by an additional term proportional to (m/k) λ3^2 and warns that one should be careful about drawing strong conclusions from Eq. (105). Since Figs. 7–10, which display the divergences, are obtained from the Callan–Symanzik flows only, the existence and scale of the divergence are not demonstrated to be regulator independent. A quantitative Litim-regulator integration, or an argument that the additional term does not alter the divergence, is needed to support the bound-state interpretation.
  2. [§VI.C and Ref. [33]] The full flow equations for the four-fermion couplings, which are the central objects of Sec. VI and drive the numerical results in Fig. 7, are not given in the manuscript; they are relegated to App. I of the Master's thesis [33]. The paper's main quantitative claims cannot be checked by a reader without consulting an external, non-peer-reviewed document. The full coupled system, or at minimum an explicit statement of the projections and the resulting ordinary differential equations, should be included in the paper or in a publicly available supplementary file.
  3. [§VI.F] The new contribution to the quark two-point vertex from the four-fermion couplings is described as logarithmically UV-divergent under the local regulator and as requiring an additional Pauli–Villars regularization (Ref. [33, Sec. 5.5]). Since this contribution is generated within the same truncation used for the full flow, the resulting numerical flows in Sec. VI.D.2 are sensitive to an extra regularization that is not described in the main text. The manuscript should explain how this UV divergence is handled in the flows shown in Fig. 7 and to what extent the divergence scale depends on that choice.
  4. [§V.C] The pole in the denominator of Eq. (57) is explicitly identified as a breakdown of the truncation, yet the subsequent sections repeatedly use the scale at which couplings diverge as the physically relevant strong-coupling scale. Because the divergence of the gauge coupling in a minimal truncation is a known artifact of missing higher-order vertices, a truncation error estimate or a comparison with an improved gauge-sector truncation is needed before the divergence scale k ∼ g_Λ can be used as a robust prediction.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§VIII] There is a typo in 'arrrive' in the concluding paragraph; it should read 'arrive'.
  2. [§V.E.1] Equation (60) is written for general c_ψ, while Eq. (51) is specialized to c_ψ = 1; the text would benefit from stating this explicitly near the equations to avoid confusion.
  3. [Fig. 3] The horizontal axis label 'g_Λ/k' is used as a dimensionless ratio, but the caption does not define g_Λ or state the initial conditions; adding an explicit definition would improve readability.
  4. [§I.D] The reliance on a Master's thesis [33] for conventions and derivations should be clearly marked in the reference list as an online supplementary source, since it is not a standard peer-reviewed publication.
  5. [§VI.B] The discussion of the Gross–Neveu and Thirring models is useful, but the notation 'NJL_2' for the chiral Gross–Neveu model is introduced without a citation to the two-dimensional NJL literature beyond Refs. [118,119]; adding a reference would help readers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the flow equations are parameter-free outputs of the Wetterich equation; the only self-reference is a technical thesis used for algebra, not as evidence.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular in the required sense. The starting point, Eq. (38), is the exact Wetterich equation; Eqs. (39) and (89) are stated truncations with stated assumptions, not definitions of the target results. The flow equations for g, m, and the four-fermion couplings are obtained by functional differentiation and projection, and the UV initial conditions (g_Lambda, m_Lambda, lambda_i=0, Z_psi=1) are scheme or initial data, not fitted to any IR outcome. The IR divergences of g, m, and the lambda_i are numerical outputs of these parameter-free flows, not inputs. External benchmarks anchor the equations: the leading term of Eq. (57) reproduces the perturbative one-loop beta function, and Sec. VI.D.3 recognizes the Gross-Neveu limit of the pure-fermion flows. The references to the first author's Master's thesis [33] for the lengthy four-fermion algebra, and to [72] for conventions, are self-citations but non-load-bearing: the main text states the reduced equations and the thesis is technical derivation material, not an external theorem invoked to force a conclusion. The paper's own caveats ('pole in the denominator already signals a breakdown of our truncation', Sec. V.C; 'one might argue that the divergence of the four-fermion couplings already signals the limitations of the approximation', Sec. VI.D.3) are robustness warnings about truncation and regulator dependence, not evidence that outputs were inserted as inputs. The Litim-regulator check in Sec. VI.E could make the bound-state interpretation fragile, but fragility is a correctness risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard FRG machinery (Wetterich equation, background-field method), on truncation choices, and on the properties of a local regulator. No fitted constants are used to reach the qualitative IR conclusions, but the truncation itself is the main uncontrolled input.

free parameters (2)
  • c_psi (regulator scale ratio between quark and gluon regulators) = 1 (mostly)
    Introduced in Eq. (33) as the ratio of regularization scales between quarks and gluons/ghosts; set to 1 in most of the work. The fermion mass flow and the UV analysis depend on it, and for the gluon-dominated case one needs c_psi >= 1 (Sec. V.E.1). It is a scheme choice, not fitted to data.
  • UV initial conditions m_Lambda, g_Lambda, Lambda = chosen by hand, e.g. Lambda/g_Lambda = 10^5, m_Lambda/g_Lambda = 10^-3 or 10^-2
    The flow solutions shown in Figs. 3 and 7 use these hand-picked initial conditions. The scale at which couplings diverge depends on them, but the paper makes no quantitative prediction and stresses the truncation's breakdown.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math The Wetterich equation (Eq. (38)) is the exact flow equation of the effective average action
    Unproved background result; the entire derivation is built on it (Sec. IV).
  • standard math Background-field method and gauge invariance of Gamma_k, including the Ward-Takahashi identity (Eq. (36)) and the modified Nielsen identity (Eq. (37))
    Standard QFT background used in Sec. III to justify the gauge-fixed effective action and the regulator properties.
  • ad hoc to paper The truncation ansatz for the effective average action, Eqs. (39) and (89), captures the relevant physics
    The flow equations and IR conclusions depend entirely on restricting Gamma_k to a minimal set of local, momentum-independent operators; the paper acknowledges this and takes the divergence as a sign of the truncation's breakdown (Secs. V.C, VI.D.3).
  • standard math Fierz completeness: in d=2 for Nf=1, only three of the nine local four-fermion channels are algebraically independent
    Used in Sec. VI.C to invert the projection matrix M and reduce to the basis {lambda1, lambda2, lambda3}; proof delegated to the Master's thesis Ref. [33, App. B].
  • domain assumption The Callan-Symanzik local regulator Delta S_k of Eq. (33) is an admissible regulator that leaves the Ward-Takahashi and Nielsen identities intact and preserves Osterwalder-Schrader axioms
    This is the central methodical assumption of the paper; properties 1-3 in Sec. III.D and appendices B and C provide arguments, but the specific regulator choice is not compared to any external benchmark in the IR.
  • standard math The Coleman-Mermin-Wagner-Hohenberg-Berezinskii theorem forbids spontaneous breaking of continuous global symmetries in 2D
    Invoked in Sec. II.B to exclude spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking for finite Nc and Nf, motivating the bound-state rather than condensate interpretation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Functional renormalization of QCD in $1 + 1$ dimensions: four-fermion interactions from quark-gluon dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OVB3CSOH

@misc{pith2026241216051,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Functional renormalization of QCD in $1 + 1$ dimensions: four-fermion interactions from quark-gluon dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OVB3CSOH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.16051}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum Chromodynamics in two spacetime dimensions is investigated with the Functional Renormalization Group. We use a functional formulation with covariant gauge fixing and derive Renormalization Group flow equations for the gauge coupling, quark mass and an algebraically complete set of local fermion-fermion interaction vertices. The flow, based on a convenient Callan-Symanzik-type regularization, shows the expected behavior for a super-renormalizable theory in the ultraviolet regime and leads to a strongly coupled regime in the infrared. Through a detailed discussion of symmetry implications, and variations in the gauge group and flavor numbers, the analysis sets the stage for a more detailed investigation of the bound state spectrum in future work.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.16051 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Overview of various interests in the literature in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Flow-diagram for the dimensionless gauge coupling ˜g [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Flow of the gauge coupling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Box-diagrams contributing to the flow of the four [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Purely fermionic diagrams contributing to the flow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Triangle-diagrams contributing to the flow of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Numerical solution to the flow equations of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Flow of the four-fermion couplings into a fixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Flow of the four-fermion couplings in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

152 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [33]

    Blau and G

    M. Blau and G. Thompson, Lectures on 2-d gauge the- ories: Topological aspects and path integral techniques, in Summer School in High-energy Physics and Cos- mology (Includes Workshop on Strings, Gravity, and Related Topics 29-30 Jul 1993) (1993) pp. 0175–244, arXiv:hep-th/9310144

    arXiv 1993

  2. [1]

    model scale

    For the gluon dominated case with ¯n >0 we find g = g∞q 1 − ¯n g2∞ k2 , (66) m = m∞ (67) + N 2 c − 1 4π Nc 2 cψ ln cψ c2 ψ − 1 g∞√¯n arctanh √¯n g∞ k , where the UV scale is removed by Λ → ∞, see Ref. [33, App. H] for an explicit derivation. The condition ¯n >0 is certainly true for Nc = 3, cψ ≥1 and Nf ≤ 6 – values similar to QCD in four di- mensions. It...

  3. [2]

    For the fermion dominated case with ¯n <0 we still find g = g∞q 1 − ¯n g2∞ k2 , (69) 12 while m = m∞ + N 2 c − 1 4π Nc 2 cψ ln cψ c2 ψ − 1 g∞p |¯n| × h π 2 − arccot p |¯n| g∞ k i , (70) where the UV scale was again removed Λ → ∞. However, due to the sign-change of ¯ n, instead of running into an IR divergence, the coupling de- creases towards the IR and w...

  4. [3]

    An increasing fermion mass in general implies a suppres- sion of fermionic fluctuations which leads to a suppression of their contributions to the RG flow

    Large coupling and fermion mass Let us return to the case ¯n >0 and ask what actually happens to our full flow equations (59) and (60) when the gauge coupling and fermion mass both become large at some intermediate RG scale on their evolution to the IR. An increasing fermion mass in general implies a suppres- sion of fermionic fluctuations which leads to ...

  5. [4]

    planar dia- grams

    Infinite- Nc limit We emphasized already the importance of the sign of ¯n defined in Eq. (64) in the UV regime. Therefore, it is worthwhile to further discuss the model for a boson or fermion dominated theory. In this section, we study the former case. In particular the infinite- Nc limit, also known as the ’t Hooft limit [8], is interesting. The im- plic...

  6. [5]

    overcomplete basis

    Large and infinite- Nf limit Now, we turn to the fermion dominated case with ¯n <0. Similarly, as discussed before, one can take the infinite-Nf limit by keeping g2 Nf fixed. Again the the- ory becomes a mean-field theory but this limit is stronger than the infinite- Nc limit because gluons do not carry a flavor index. Hence, all diagrams with an internal...

  7. [6]

    Here, we study how the four-fermion couplings are generated from the dynamics of the gauge sector

    Dynamics in the UV First of all, we investigate the UV regime as done for the minimal ansatz in Section V E 1. Here, we study how the four-fermion couplings are generated from the dynamics of the gauge sector. In particular, all contri- butions from the triangle-diagrams and purely fermionic self interactions are irrelevant for the initial condition lim k...

  8. [7]

    [33, App

    Full equations To obtain the full solution to our system of flow equa- tions, see again Ref. [33, App. I], including the flow equa- tions of the gauge coupling and fermion mass, Eqs. (59) and (60), we have to make use of numerical integration. The UV-limit helps to test the numerical implementation against an analytical solution. The numerical results are...

Show all 152 references
  1. [8]

    This is of interest for several (related) reasons:

    Limit of zero gauge coupling Let us also consider the limit of vanishing gauge cou- pling, g → 0, which reduces the model to a purely four- fermion theory in 1 + 1 dimensions. This is of interest for several (related) reasons:

  2. [9]

    It treats a Fierz-complete set of four-fermion interactions and one can learn, amongst other things, about the validity of a one or few channel approximation like the GN model

    The purely fermionic model alone is of interest as a standalone QFT. It treats a Fierz-complete set of four-fermion interactions and one can learn, amongst other things, about the validity of a one or few channel approximation like the GN model

  3. [10]

    switch off

    The divergence in the gauge coupling prevents us from gaining insights in the dynamics caused by the purely fermionic diagrams shown in Fig. 6. The simplest way to study these contributions is to manually “switch off” the gauge sector by setting g = 0. Another approach, which ...

  4. [11]

    This may indeed be the case for a more sophisti- cated truncation of the effective action in its gauge sector that renders the flow of the dimensionless gauge coupling finite

    The limit corresponds to a scenario where the purely fermionic diagrams are the dominant ones. This may indeed be the case for a more sophisti- cated truncation of the effective action in its gauge sector that renders the flow of the dimensionless gauge coupling finite. In fou...

  5. [12]

    In addition, many models are exactly solvable in this limit and different questions can be ad- dressed analytically

    Infinite- Nc limit Another interesting limit is the infinite- Nc limit as al- ready motivated and discussed for the minimal ansatz in Section V E 3. In addition, many models are exactly solvable in this limit and different questions can be ad- dressed analytically. For instanc...

  6. [13]

    [96, 129, 130] for more examples

    reveals the bound states of the theory while the GN model can be solved to obtain even its phase diagram [120, 128], see Refs. [96, 129, 130] for more examples. There is no further rescaling of the couplingsλ1, . . . , λ3 necessary because there is already a factor 1/Nc includ...

  7. [14]

    flowing bosonization

    There- fore, one has to be careful about drawing strong conclu- sions from the simplification of the flow equation of λ3, Eq. (105). However, a detailed analysis of using other regulators is beyond the scope of this work and might be subject to future investigations. Moreover,...

  8. [15]

    Gross et al., 50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics, Eur

    F. Gross et al., 50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1125 (2023), arXiv:2212.11107 [hep- ph]

    2023 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Sch¨ on and M

    V. Sch¨ on and M. Thies, 2-D model field theories at finite temperature and density, in At The Frontier of Parti- cle Physics: Handbook of QCD, Boris Ioffe Festschrift , Vol. 3 (World Scentific, 2000) Chap. 33, pp. 1945–2032, arXiv:hep-th/0008175

    2000 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Abdalla and M

    E. Abdalla and M. C. B. Abdalla, Updating QCD in two-dimensions, Phys. Rept. 265, 253 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9503002

    1996 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Y. S. Kalashnikova and A. V. Nefediev, Two- dimensional QCD in the Coulomb gauge, Phys. Usp. 45, 347 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0111225

    2002 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Andersson, The Lund Model , Cambridge Mono- graphs on Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cos- mology, Vol

    B. Andersson, The Lund Model , Cambridge Mono- graphs on Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cos- mology, Vol. 7 (Cambridge University Press, 2023)

    2023

  13. [20]

    ’t Hooft, A Two-Dimensional Model for Mesons, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, A Two-Dimensional Model for Mesons, Nucl. Phys. B 75, 461 (1974)

    1974

  14. [21]

    A. R. Zhitnitsky, On Chiral Symmetry Breaking in QCD in Two-dimensions (Nc → Infinity), Phys. Lett. B 165, 405 (1985)

    1985

  15. [22]

    ’t Hooft, A planar diagram theory for strong inter- actions, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, A planar diagram theory for strong inter- actions, Nucl. Phys. B 72, 461 (1974)

    1974

  16. [23]

    W. R. Gutierrez, Path Integral Approach to the Large N Expansion of the Two-dimensional u(n) QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 176, 185 (1980)

    1980

  17. [24]

    S. J. Brodsky, H.-C. Pauli, and S. S. Pinsky, Quan- tum chromodynamics and other field theories on the light cone, Phys. Rept. 301, 299 (1998), arXiv:hep- ph/9705477

    1998

  18. [25]

    P. D. Mannheim, P. Lowdon, and S. J. Brodsky, Com- paring light-front quantization with instant-time quan- tization, Phys. Rept. 891, 1 (2021), arXiv:2005.00109 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Ambrosino and S

    F. Ambrosino and S. Komatsu, 2d QCD and Integra- bility, Part I: ’t Hooft model (2023), arXiv:2312.15598 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Ambrosino and S

    F. Ambrosino and S. Komatsu, 2d QCD and Integrabil- ity, Part II: Generalized QCD (2024), arXiv:2406.11078 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [28]

    I. V. Kochergin, 1/N corrections in QCD 2: small 27 mass limit and threshold states, JHEP 02, 073, arXiv:2405.04031 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  22. [29]

    Litvinov and P

    A. Litvinov and P. Meshcheriakov, Meson mass spec- trum in QCD2 ’t Hooft’s model, Nucl. Phys. B 1010, 116766 (2025), arXiv:2409.11324 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Hoyer, ’t hooft model in the temporal gauge (2025), arXiv:2501.18352 [hep-ph]

    P. Hoyer, ’t hooft model in the temporal gauge (2025), arXiv:2501.18352 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Sch¨ on and M

    V. Sch¨ on and M. Thies, Decompactification of space or time in large N QCD(2), Phys. Lett. B 481, 299 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/0001162

    2000 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Cordes, G

    S. Cordes, G. W. Moore, and S. Ramgoolam, Lectures on 2-d Yang-Mills theory, equivariant cohomology and topological field theories, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 41, 184 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9411210

    1995 arXiv

  26. [34]

    A. A. Migdal, Recursion Equations in Gauge Theories, Sov. Phys. JETP 42, 413 (1975)

    1975

  27. [35]

    Witten, On quantum gauge theories in two- dimensions, Commun

    E. Witten, On quantum gauge theories in two- dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys. 141, 153 (1991)

    1991

  28. [36]

    Witten, Two-dimensional gauge theories revisited, J

    E. Witten, Two-dimensional gauge theories revisited, J. Geom. Phys. 9, 303 (1992), arXiv:hep-th/9204083

    1992 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Abdalla, M

    E. Abdalla, M. C. B. Abdalla, and K. D. Rothe, Nonper- turbative methods in 2 dimensional quantum field the- ory, 2nd ed. (World Scientific, 2001)

    2001

  30. [38]

    R. M. Konik, M. Lajer, R. D. Pisarski, and A. M. Tsve- lik, Nuclear Matter in 1 + 1 Dimensions, Universe 7, 411 (2021), arXiv:2202.01016 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Lajer, R

    M. Lajer, R. M. Konik, R. D. Pisarski, and A. M. Tsve- lik, When cold, dense quarks in 1+1 and 3+1 dimen- sions are not a Fermi liquid, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054035 (2022), arXiv:2112.10238 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Bergner, S

    G. Bergner, S. Piemonte, and M. ¨Unsal, Investigating two-dimensional adjoint QCD on the lattice, JHEP 7 (48), 48, arXiv:2404.03801 [hep-lat]

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    J. A. Damia, G. Galati, and L. Tizzano, Symmetries, universes and phases of QCD 2 with an adjoint Dirac fermion, JHEP 12, 230, arXiv:2409.17989 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    R. C. Farrell, I. A. Chernyshev, S. J. M. Powell, N. A. Zemlevskiy, M. Illa, and M. J. Savage, Preparations for quantum simulations of quantum chromodynamics in 1+1 dimensions. I. Axial gauge, Phys. Rev. D 107, 054512 (2023), arXiv:2207.01731 [quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [43]

    R. C. Farrell, I. A. Chernyshev, S. J. M. Powell, N. A. Zemlevskiy, M. Illa, and M. J. Savage, Preparations for quantum simulations of quantum chromodynamics in 1+1 dimensions. II. Single-baryon β-decay in real time, Phys. Rev. D 107, 054513 (2023), arXiv:2209.10781 [quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    H. Liu, T. Bhattacharya, S. Chandrasekharan, and R. Gupta, Phases of 2d massless QCD with qubit regu- larization (2023), arXiv:2312.17734 [hep-lat]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Y. Y. Atas, J. F. Haase, J. Zhang, V. Wei, S. M. L. Pfaendler, R. Lewis, and C. A. Muschik, Simulat- ing one-dimensional quantum chromodynamics on a quantum computer: Real-time evolutions of tetra- and pentaquarks, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033184 (2023), arXiv:2207.03473 [quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  38. [46]

    A. N. Ciavarella, Quantum simulation of lattice QCD with improved Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. D 108, 094513 (2023), arXiv:2307.05593 [hep-lat]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Oevermann, Renormalization group flow of QCD in 1+1 Dimensions , Master thesis, Friedrich-Schiller- Universit¨ at Jena, Jena (2024)

    E. Oevermann, Renormalization group flow of QCD in 1+1 Dimensions , Master thesis, Friedrich-Schiller- Universit¨ at Jena, Jena (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    Frishman and J

    Y. Frishman and J. Sonnenschein, Non-Perturbative Field Theory – From Two Dimensional Conformal field Theory to QCD in Four Dimensions (2010), arXiv:1004.4859 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Shifman, Advanced topics in quantum field theory.: A lecture course (Cambridge Univ

    M. Shifman, Advanced topics in quantum field theory.: A lecture course (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012)

    2012

  42. [50]

    S. R. Coleman, Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1985)

    1985

  43. [51]

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of ferro- magnetism or antiferromagnetism in one- or two- dimensional isotropic Heisenberg models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1133 (1966)

    1966

  44. [52]

    S. R. Coleman, There are no Goldstone bosons in two- dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys. 31, 259 (1973)

    1973

  45. [53]

    P. C. Hohenberg, Existence of long-range order in one and two dimensions, Phys. Rev. 158, 383 (1967)

    1967

  46. [54]

    V. L. Berezinskii, Destruction of Long-range Order in One-dimensional and Two-dimensional Systems having a Continuous Symmetry Group I. Classical Systems, Sov. Phys. JETP 32, 493 (1971)

    1971

  47. [55]

    V. L. Berezinsky, Destruction of Long-range Order in One-dimensional and Two-dimensional Systems Pos- sessing a Continuous Symmetry Group. II. Quantum Systems., Sov. Phys. JETP 34, 610 (1972)

    1972

  48. [56]

    J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, Ordering, metasta- bility and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems, J. Phys. C 6, 1181 (1973)

    1973

  49. [57]

    B. S. DeWitt, Dynamical theory of groups and fields (Gordon and Breach, New York, USA, 1965)

    1965

  50. [58]

    R. E. Kallosh, The Renormalization in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 78, 293 (1974)

    1974

  51. [59]

    Honerkamp, The Question of invariant renormaliz- ability of the massless Yang-Mills theory in a manifest covariant approach, Nucl

    J. Honerkamp, The Question of invariant renormaliz- ability of the massless Yang-Mills theory in a manifest covariant approach, Nucl. Phys. B 48, 269 (1972)

    1972

  52. [60]

    I. Y. Arefeva, L. D. Faddeev, and A. A. Slavnov, Gen- erating Functional for the s Matrix in Gauge Theories, Teor. Mat. Fiz. 21, 311 (1974)

    1974

  53. [61]

    Sarkar, Mixing of Operators in Wilson Expansions, Nucl

    S. Sarkar, Mixing of Operators in Wilson Expansions, Nucl. Phys. B 82, 447 (1974)

    1974

  54. [62]

    Sarkar and H

    S. Sarkar and H. Strubbe, Anomalous Dimensions in Background Field Gauges, Nucl. Phys. B 90, 45 (1975)

    1975

  55. [63]

    Kluberg-Stern and J.-B

    H. Kluberg-Stern and J.-B. Zuber, Renormalization of Nonabelian Gauge Theories in a Background Field Gauge. 1. Green Functions, Phys. Rev. D 12, 482 (1975)

    1975

  56. [64]

    Kluberg-Stern and J.-B

    H. Kluberg-Stern and J.-B. Zuber, Renormalization of Nonabelian Gauge Theories in a Background Field Gauge. 2. Gauge Invariant Operators, Phys. Rev. D 12, 3159 (1975)

    1975

  57. [65]

    ’t Hooft, An algorithm for the poles at dimension four in the dimensional regularization procedure, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, An algorithm for the poles at dimension four in the dimensional regularization procedure, Nucl. Phys. B 62, 444 (1973)

    1973

  58. [66]

    M. T. Grisaru, P. van Nieuwenhuizen, and C. C. Wu, Background Field Method Versus Normal Field The- ory in Explicit Examples: One Loop Divergences in S Matrix and Green’s Functions for Yang-Mills and Grav- itational Fields, Phys. Rev. D 12, 3203 (1975). 28

    1975

  59. [67]

    L. F. Abbott, The Background Field Method Beyond One Loop, Nucl. Phys. B 185, 189 (1981)

    1981

  60. [68]

    L. F. Abbott, Introduction to the Background Field Method, Acta Phys. Polon. B 13, 33 (1982)

    1982

  61. [69]

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An introduction to quantum field theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995)

    1995

  62. [70]

    Dupuis, L

    N. Dupuis, L. Canet, A. Eichhorn, W. Metzner, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, The nonper- turbative functional renormalization group and its ap- plications, Phys. Rept. 910, 1 (2021), arXiv:2006.04853 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2021 arXiv

  63. [71]

    L. D. Faddeev and V. N. Popov, Feynman Diagrams for the Yang-Mills Field, Phys. Lett. B 25, 29 (1967)

    1967

  64. [72]

    V. N. Gribov, Quantization of Nonabelian Gauge The- ories, Nucl. Phys. B 139, 1 (1978)

    1978

  65. [73]

    Vandersickel and D

    N. Vandersickel and D. Zwanziger, The Gribov prob- lem and QCD dynamics, Phys. Rept. 520, 175 (2012), arXiv:1202.1491 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  66. [74]

    D. H. Dudal, S. P. Sorella, N. Vandersickel, and H. Ver- schelde, The Effects of Gribov copies in 2D gauge the- ories, Phys. Lett. B 680, 377 (2009), arXiv:0808.3379 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Freire, D

    F. Freire, D. F. Litim, and J. M. Pawlowski, Gauge in- variance and background field formalism in the exact renormalization group, Phys. Lett. B 495, 256 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/0009110

    2000 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Gies, Introduction to the Functional RG and appli- cations to gauge theories, Lect

    H. Gies, Introduction to the Functional RG and appli- cations to gauge theories, Lect. Notes Phys. 852, 287 (2012), arXiv:hep-ph/0611146

    2012 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Becchi, A

    C. Becchi, A. Rouet, and R. F. Stora, Renormalization of Gauge Theories, Annals Phys. 98, 287 (1976)

    1976

  70. [78]

    I. V. Tyutin, Gauge Invariance in Field Theory and Statistical Physics in Operator Formalism (1975), arXiv:0812.0580 [hep-th]

    1975 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Osterwalder and R

    K. Osterwalder and R. Schrader, Axioms for Eu- clidean Green’s Functions, Commun. Math. Phys. 31, 83 (1973)

    1973

  72. [80]

    Osterwalder and R

    K. Osterwalder and R. Schrader, Axioms for Euclidean Green’s Functions. 2., Commun. Math. Phys. 42, 281 (1975)

    1975

  73. [81]

    Braun, Y.-r

    J. Braun, Y.-r. Chen, W.-j. Fu, A. Geißel, J. Horak, C. Huang, F. Ihssen, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Reichert, F. Rennecke, Y.-y. Tan, S. T¨ opfel, J. Wessely, and N. Wink, Renormalised spectral flows, SciPost Phys. Core 6, 061 (2023), arXiv:2206.10232 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Gurau, V

    R. Gurau, V. Rivasseau, and A. Sfondrini, Renormal- ization: an advanced overview (2014), arXiv:1401.5003 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the ef- fective potential, Phys

    C. Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the ef- fective potential, Phys. Lett. B 301, 90 (1993), arXiv:1710.05815 [hep-th]

    1993 arXiv

  76. [84]

    T. R. Morris, The Exact Renormalization Group and approximate solutions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 09, 2411 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9308265

    1994 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Ellwanger, Flow equations for N point functions and bound states, Z

    U. Ellwanger, Flow equations for N point functions and bound states, Z. Phys. C 62, 503 (1994), arXiv:hep- ph/9308260

    1994

  78. [86]

    Koenigstein, Non-perturbative aspects of (low- dimensional) quantum field theories, Phd thesis, Univer- sit¨ atsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg (2023)

    A. Koenigstein, Non-perturbative aspects of (low- dimensional) quantum field theories, Phd thesis, Univer- sit¨ atsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg (2023)

    2023

  79. [87]

    J. M. Pawlowski, Aspects of the functional renormalisa- tion group, Annals Phys. 322, 2831 (2007), arXiv:hep- th/0512261

    2007

  80. [88]

    Rennecke, The chiral phase transition of QCD , Phd thesis, University of Heidelberg (2015)

    F. Rennecke, The chiral phase transition of QCD , Phd thesis, University of Heidelberg (2015)

    2015

  81. [89]

    Kopietz, L

    P. Kopietz, L. Bartosch, and F. Sch¨ utz,Introduction to the Functional Renormalization Group , Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 798 (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010)

    2010

  82. [90]

    Berges, N

    J. Berges, N. Tetradis, and C. Wetterich, Nonpertur- bative renormalization flow in quantum field theory and statistical physics, Phys. Rept. 363, 223 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0005122

    2002 arXiv

  83. [91]

    D. F. Litim, Optimization of the exact renormaliza- tion group, Phys. Lett. B 486, 92 (2000), arXiv:hep- th/0005245

    2000

  84. [92]

    D. F. Litim, Optimized renormalization group flows, Phys. Rev. D 64, 105007 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0103195

    2001 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Canet, B

    L. Canet, B. Delamotte, D. Mouhanna, and J. Vidal, Optimization of the derivative expansion in the non- perturbative Renormalization Group, Phys. Rev. D 67, 065004 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0211055

    2003 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Canet, B

    L. Canet, B. Delamotte, D. Mouhanna, and J. Vidal, Nonperturbative Renormalization Group approach to the Ising model: A derivative expansion at order ∂4, Phys. Rev. B 68, 064421 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0302227

    2003 arXiv

  87. [95]

    O. J. Rosten, Fundamentals of the Exact Renor- malization Group, Phys. Rept. 511, 177 (2012), arXiv:1003.1366 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Osborn and D

    H. Osborn and D. E. Twigg, Remarks on Ex- act RG equations, Annals Phys. 327, 29 (2012), arXiv:1108.5340 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  89. [97]

    J. M. Pawlowski, M. M. Scherer, R. Schmidt, and S. J. Wetzel, Physics and the choice of regulators in func- tional renormalisation group flows, Annals Phys. 384, 165 (2017), arXiv:1512.03598 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Balog, H

    I. Balog, H. Chat´ e, B. Delamotte, M. Marohnic, and N. Wschebor, Convergence of nonperturbative approxi- mations to the Renormalization Group, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 240604 (2019), arXiv:1907.01829 [cond-mat.stat- mech]

    2019 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Braun, T

    J. Braun, T. D¨ ornfeld, B. Schallmo, and S. T¨ opfel, Renormalization group studies of dense relativis- tic systems, Phys. Rev. D 104, 096002 (2021), arXiv:2008.05978 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Zorbach, J

    N. Zorbach, J. Stoll, and J. Braun, Optimization and Stabilization of Functional Renormalization Group Flows (2024), arXiv:2401.12854 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Jungnickel and C

    D.-U. Jungnickel and C. Wetterich, Effective action for the chiral quark-meson model, Phys. Rev. D 53, 5142 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9505267

    1996 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Gies and C

    H. Gies and C. Wetterich, Universality of spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking in gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 69, 025001 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0209183

    2004 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Gies and J

    H. Gies and J. Jaeckel, Chiral phase structure of QCD with many flavors, Eur. Phys. J. C 46, 433 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0507171

    2006 arXiv

  96. [104]

    W. E. Thirring, A soluble relativistic field theory, An- nals Phys. 3, 91 (1958)

    1958

  97. [105]

    D. J. Gross and A. Neveu, Dynamical Symmetry Break- ing in Asymptotically Free Field Theories, Phys. Rev. D 10, 3235 (1974)

    1974

  98. [106]

    R. F. Dashen, B. Hasslacher, and A. Neveu, Semiclas- sical Bound States in an Asymptotically Free Theory, Phys. Rev. D 12, 2443 (1975)

    1975

  99. [107]

    J. J. Lenz, L. Pannullo, M. Wagner, B. H. Wellege- hausen, and A. Wipf, Baryons in the Gross-Neveu model 29 in 1+1 dimensions at finite number of flavors, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114501 (2020), arXiv:2007.08382 [hep-lat]

    2020 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Wolff, The phase diagram of the infinite-N Gross- Neveu model at finite temperature and chemical poten- tial, Phys

    U. Wolff, The phase diagram of the infinite-N Gross- Neveu model at finite temperature and chemical poten- tial, Phys. Lett. B 157, 303 (1985)

    1985

  101. [109]

    Schnetz, M

    O. Schnetz, M. Thies, and K. Urlichs, Phase dia- gram of the Gross-Neveu model: Exact results and condensed matter precursors, Annals Phys. 314, 425 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0402014

    2004 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Basar, G

    G. Basar, G. V. Dunne, and M. Thies, Inhomoge- neous condensates in the thermodynamics of the chi- ral NJL 2 model, Phys. Rev. D 79, 105012 (2009), arXiv:0903.1868 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Nambu and G

    Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Dynamical model of elementary particles based on an analogy with super- conductivity. II, Phys. Rev. 124, 246 (1961)

    1961

  104. [112]

    Nambu and G

    Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Dynamical model of elementary particles based on an analogy with super- conductivity. I, Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961)

    1961

  105. [113]

    Mitter, J

    M. Mitter, J. M. Pawlowski, and N. Strodthoff, Chiral symmetry breaking in continuum QCD, Phys. Rev. D 91, 054035 (2015), arXiv:1411.7978 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  106. [114]

    A. K. Cyrol, M. Mitter, J. M. Pawlowski, and N. Strodthoff, Nonperturbative quark, gluon, and me- son correlators of unquenched QCD, Phys. Rev. D 97, 054006 (2018), arXiv:1706.06326 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Braun, M

    J. Braun, M. Leonhardt, and M. Pospiech, Fierz- complete NJL model study: Fixed points and phase structure at finite temperature and density, Phys. Rev. D 96, 076003 (2017), arXiv:1705.00074 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Braun, M

    J. Braun, M. Leonhardt, and M. Pospiech, Fierz- complete NJL model study. II. Toward the fixed-point and phase structure of hot and dense two-flavor QCD, Phys. Rev. D 97, 076010 (2018), arXiv:1801.08338 [hep- ph]

    2018 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Braun, M

    J. Braun, M. Leonhardt, and M. Pospiech, Fierz- complete NJL model study III: Emergence from quark- gluon dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 101, 036004 (2020), arXiv:1909.06298 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  110. [118]

    K.-I. Aoki, K. Morikawa, J.-I. Sumi, H. Terao, and M. Tomoyose, Wilson renormalization group equations for the critical dynamics of chiral symmetry, Prog. Theor. Phys. 102, 1151 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9908042

    1999 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Braun, The QCD Phase Boundary from Quark- Gluon Dynamics, Eur

    J. Braun, The QCD Phase Boundary from Quark- Gluon Dynamics, Eur. Phys. J. C 64, 459 (2009), arXiv:0810.1727 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Braun, Fermion Interactions and Universal Behavior in Strongly Interacting Theories, J

    J. Braun, Fermion Interactions and Universal Behavior in Strongly Interacting Theories, J. Phys. G 39, 033001 (2012), arXiv:1108.4449 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Braun, L

    J. Braun, L. Fister, J. M. Pawlowski, and F. Rennecke, From Quarks and Gluons to Hadrons: Chiral Symmetry Breaking in Dynamical QCD, Phys. Rev. D 94, 034016 (2016), arXiv:1412.1045 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Aoki and M

    K.-I. Aoki and M. Yamada, The RG flow of Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model at finite temperature and density, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30, 1550180 (2015), arXiv:1504.00749 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Rennecke, Vacuum structure of vector mesons in QCD, Phys

    F. Rennecke, Vacuum structure of vector mesons in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 92, 076012 (2015), arXiv:1504.03585 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  116. [124]

    W.-j. Fu, J. M. Pawlowski, and F. Rennecke, QCD phase structure at finite temperature and density, Phys. Rev. D 101, 054032 (2020), arXiv:1909.02991 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  117. [125]

    W.-j. Fu, C. Huang, J. M. Pawlowski, and Y.-y. Tan, Four-quark scatterings in QCD I, SciPost Phys. 14, 069 (2023), arXiv:2209.13120 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  118. [126]

    W.-j. Fu, C. Huang, J. M. Pawlowski, and Y.-y. Tan, Four-quark scatterings in QCD II, SciPost Phys. 17, 148 (2024), arXiv:2401.07638 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  119. [127]

    jie Fu, C

    W. jie Fu, C. Huang, J. M. Pawlowski, Y. yang Tan, and L. jun Zhou, Four-quark scatterings in qcd iii (2025), arXiv:2502.14388 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Ihssen, J

    F. Ihssen, J. M. Pawlowski, F. R. Sattler, and N. Wink, Toward quantitative precision for QCD at large densi- ties, Phys. Rev. D111, 036030 (2025), arXiv:2309.07335 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  121. [129]

    J. O. Andersen, W. R. Naylor, and A. Tranberg, Phase diagram of QCD in a magnetic field: A review, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 025001 (2016), arXiv:1411.7176 [hep- ph]

    2016 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Buballa, NJL model analysis of quark matter at large density, Phys

    M. Buballa, NJL model analysis of quark matter at large density, Phys. Rept. 407, 205 (2005), arXiv:hep- ph/0402234

    2005

  123. [131]

    Springer, J

    P. Springer, J. Braun, S. Rechenberger, and F. Ren- necke, QCD-inspired determination of NJL model parameters, EPJ Web Conf. 137, 03022 (2017), arXiv:1611.06020 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Thies, Chiral spiral in the presence of chiral imbal- ance, Phys

    M. Thies, Chiral spiral in the presence of chiral imbal- ance, Phys. Rev. D 98, 096019 (2018), arXiv:1810.03921 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Thies, Duality study of the chiral Heisenberg-Gross- Neveu model in 1+1 dimensions, Phys

    M. Thies, Duality study of the chiral Heisenberg-Gross- Neveu model in 1+1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 102, 096006 (2020), arXiv:2008.13119 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Thies and K

    M. Thies and K. Urlichs, Revised phase diagram of the Gross-Neveu model, Phys. Rev. D 67, 125015 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0302092

    2003 arXiv

  127. [135]

    M. Q. Huber, A. K. Cyrol, and J. M. Pawlowski, DoFun 3.0: Functional equations in Mathematica, Comput. Phys. Commun. 248, 107058 (2020), arXiv:1908.02760 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Wolfram Research, Inc., Mathematica, Version 13.0 (2023)

    2023

  129. [137]

    A. K. Cyrol, M. Mitter, and N. Strodthoff, FormTracer - A Mathematica Tracing Package Using FORM, Com- put. Phys. Commun. 219, 346 (2017), arXiv:1610.09331 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Gies, Running coupling in Yang-Mills theory: A flow equation study, Phys

    H. Gies, Running coupling in Yang-Mills theory: A flow equation study, Phys. Rev. D 66, 025006 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0202207

    2002 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Hubbard, Calculation of partition functions, Phys

    J. Hubbard, Calculation of partition functions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 77 (1959)

    1959

  132. [140]

    R. L. Stratonovich, On a Method of Calculating Quan- tum Distribution Functions, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 2, 416 (1957)

    1957

  133. [141]

    Metzner, M

    W. Metzner, M. Salmhofer, C. Honerkamp, V. Meden, and K. Schonhammer, Functional renormalization group approach to correlated fermion systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 299 (2012), arXiv:1105.5289 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2012 arXiv

  134. [142]

    Thies, From relativistic quantum fields to condensed matter and back again: Updating the Gross-Neveu phase diagram, J

    M. Thies, From relativistic quantum fields to condensed matter and back again: Updating the Gross-Neveu phase diagram, J. Phys. A 39, 12707 (2006), arXiv:hep- th/0601049

    2006

  135. [143]

    Boehmer and M

    C. Boehmer and M. Thies, Large N solution of gener- alized Gross-Neveu model with two coupling constants, Phys. Rev. D 80, 125038 (2009), arXiv:0909.3714 [hep- th]

    2009 arXiv

  136. [144]

    Thies, Phase structure of the (1 + 1)-dimensional 30 Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model with isospin, Phys

    M. Thies, Phase structure of the (1 + 1)-dimensional 30 Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model with isospin, Phys. Rev. D 101, 014010 (2020), arXiv:1911.11439 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  137. [145]

    Cresswell-Hogg and D

    C. Cresswell-Hogg and D. F. Litim, Fermions and the renormalisation group at large n (2025), arXiv:2502.04473 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  138. [146]

    Gies and C

    H. Gies and C. Wetterich, Renormalization flow of bound states, Phys. Rev. D 65, 065001 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0107221

    2002 arXiv

  139. [147]

    Floerchinger and C

    S. Floerchinger and C. Wetterich, Exact flow equation for composite operators, Phys. Lett. B 680, 371 (2009), arXiv:0905.0915 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  140. [148]

    Ihssen and J

    F. Ihssen and J. M. Pawlowski, Physics-informed renor- malisation group flows (2024), arXiv:2409.13679 [hep- th]

    2024 arXiv

  141. [149]

    Oevermann, A

    E. Oevermann, A. Koenigstein, and S. Floerchinger, Functional renormalization of qcd in 1 + 1 dimensions: four-fermion interactions from quark-gluon dynamics (2024), arXiv:2412.16051 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  142. [150]

    Gkiatas, Towards a BRST-invariant construction of pure Yang-Mills theory , Ph.D

    D. Gkiatas, Towards a BRST-invariant construction of pure Yang-Mills theory , Ph.D. thesis, University Jena (2023)

    2023

  143. [151]

    Nakanishi, Covariant Quantization of the Electro- magnetic Field in the Landau Gauge, Prog

    N. Nakanishi, Covariant Quantization of the Electro- magnetic Field in the Landau Gauge, Prog. Theor. Phys. 35, 1111 (1966)

    1966

  144. [152]

    B. E. Lautrup, Canonical quantum electrodynamics in covariant gauges, K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Mat. Fys. Medd. 35 (1967)

    1967

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.