Transcendental structure of multiloop massless correlators and anomalous dimensions

K. G. Chetyrkin; P. A. Baikov

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 37 references

Transcendental structure of multiloop massless correlators and anomalous dimensions

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A 'hatted representation' of zeta values reduces every $\pi$-dependent term in 7-loop beta functions and anomalous dimensions to lower-loop data.

desk verdict A genuinely useful extension of the hatted-representation program, but the 7- and 8-loop 'predictions' are extrapolations that pass impressive tests, not theorems. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03012 v2 pith:OWNNL7PZ submitted 2019-08-08 hep-ph hep-th

P. A. Baikov , K. G. Chetyrkin This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-phhep-th PACS 11.10.Gh11.10.Hi11.15.Bt12.38.Bx

keywords hattedrepresentationno-pitheoremmasslesspropagatorintegralsevenzetavaluesanomalousdimensionsbetafunctionmultipleζ12

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the $\pi$-dependent (even-zeta) terms in massless Feynman integrals are not free constants: they obey a 'hatted representation' in which odd-zeta generators are shifted by explicit powers of $\pi$ times rational $\epsilon$-polynomials, so that any propagator-type integral can be rewritten without $\pi$ at all. Using deep $\epsilon$-expansions of four-loop master integrals as the only input, the authors predict the full $\pi$-dependent content of 7-loop $\beta$ functions and anomalous dimensions in any one-charge, minimally renormalized massless field theory, and extend the prediction to 8 loops for transcendental weight up to 11 under a stated scenario. All available checks agree: the complete 7-loop $O(n)$ $\varphi^4$ results, and the large-$N_f$ QCD results at 7 and 8 loops. If the framework is right, the appearance of powers of $\pi$ in high-loop RG functions is a lower-order bookkeeping phenomenon, and the constant $\zeta_{12}$ is singled out as the first possible obstruction at 7 loops.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the hatted representation: for each independent transcendental generator $t_i$ appearing in the p-integrals of a given loop order, one defines $\hat{t}_i = t_i + \epsilon \sum_\alpha h_{i\alpha}(\epsilon) T_{\pi,\alpha}$, with $T_{\pi,\alpha}$ monomials containing at least one explicit power of $\pi$, and rational polynomial coefficients $h_{i\alpha}$, chosen so that every p-integral satisfies $F(\epsilon,t_1,\dots,t_M,\pi) = F(\epsilon,\hat{t}_1,\dots,\hat{t}_M,0) + O(\epsilon)$. The work it does is to turn the no-$\pi$ theorem into a prediction machine: once the hatted generators are known at loop level $L$, the $\pi$-dependent parts of the $(L+1)$-loop $\beta$ function and anomalous dimensions are fixed rational expressions in the $\epsilon^0$ hatted coefficients of lower loops. The concrete identities are the hatted forms for $\zeta_3,\zeta_5,\zeta_7,\zeta_{5,3},\zeta_9,\zeta_{7,3},\zeta_{11},\zeta_{5,3,3}$ at 6 loops, eqs. (3.1)--(3.8), and their 7-loop extensions, eqs. (5.1)--(5.13), where the coefficients marked '?' in front of $\zeta_{12}$ are undetermined. The input data are the deep $\epsilon$-expansions of four-loop master integrals to transcendental weight 13.

What would settle it

Compute any 7-loop master p-integral that contains one of the multiple zeta values $\zeta_{5,3}$, $\zeta_{7,3}$, $\zeta_{9,3}$, $\zeta_{5,3,3}$, $\zeta_{5,5,3}$, $\zeta_{7,3,3}$, or $\zeta_{6,4,1,1}$ and lies outside the subset $P_4/\epsilon^3$, then check whether its $\epsilon$-expansion admits the hatted form (5.1)--(5.13) with rational question-mark coefficients. If such an integral requires a $\pi$-dependent term of weight below 12 that cannot be absorbed by adjusting the $\zeta_{12}$ coefficients, the conservative Scenario 2 fails and the 8-loop formulas (6.1)--(6.21) are incomplete; if it requires no such term, Scenario 2 is supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for every massless Euclidean propagator-type integral ('p-integral') up to seven loops, the dependence on $\pi$ (equivalently on even zetas $\zeta_4,\zeta_6,\dots$) can be eliminated by replacing the irrational generators $t_i$ (odd zetas and multiple zeta values) with hatted generators $\hat{t}_i$ that differ from $t_i$ by $\epsilon$-suppressed, $\pi$-dependent terms. With this replacement, $F(\epsilon,t_1,\dots,t_M,\pi) = F(\epsilon,\hat{t}_1,\dots,\hat{t}_M,0) + O(\epsilon)$ for every p-integral, and the no-$\pi$ theorem of the authors' earlier paper converts this statement into explicit linear formulas: the coefficient of $\zeta_4$ or $\zeta_6$ or a higher even-zeta combination in an $L$-loop $\beta$ function or anomalous dimension is a fixed rational combination of lower-loop, $\pi$-free coefficients. The paper constructs the hatted generators explicitly for 5- and 6-loop p-integrals, reproduces the known 5-loop results, and constructs them partially for 7-loop p-integrals, where the new constant $\zeta_{12}$ appears and four coefficients are left undetermined. Under the conservative Scenario 2, the resulting 8-loop formulas for weights up to 11 are written out, and every currently available 7- and 8-loop result in $O(n)$ $\varphi^4$ theory and large-$N_f$ QCD is in agreement with them.

Load-bearing premise

For the eight-loop predictions, the load-bearing premise is that every seven-loop master integral outside the explicitly checked subset can be written in hatted form up to terms proportional to $\zeta_{12}$; the question marks in eqs. (5.4), (5.8), (5.9), and (5.13) mark exactly where this premise is unverified.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

At 7 loops, the $\pi$-dependent parts of beta functions and anomalous dimensions in any one-charge minimally renormalized massless model are fixed by lower-loop data, so no new $\pi$-dependent master integral is needed.
At 8 loops, all $\pi$-dependent terms of transcendental weight $\le 11$ are likewise fixed, provided the conservative Scenario 2 holds; the explicit formulas are eqs. (6.1)--(6.21).
The $\epsilon$-expansion of 4-loop master integrals determines the $D=4$ values of finite 5-, 6-, and 7-loop p-integrals, so expanding the 4-loop masters to even higher weight should yield new constraints at 8 and more loops.
The constant $\zeta_{12}$ is singled out as the first possible obstruction to a fully $\pi$-free hatted basis at 7 loops; all 369 known 7-loop finite p-integrals from the multiple-zeta database become $\pi$-free once $\zeta_{12}$ terms are discarded.
All available 7- and 8-loop results in $O(n)$ $\varphi^4$ theory and in large-$N_f$ QCD (beta function and quark-mass anomalous dimension) agree with the predicted $\pi$-dependent terms.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A direct evaluation of the question-mark coefficients in eqs. (5.4), (5.8), (5.9), and (5.13) would decide between Scenario 2 and Scenario 3; the paper's method suggests this can be attempted by extending the 4-loop $\epsilon$-expansions to weight 14 rather than by direct 7-loop integrations.
If the missing 6-loop constants can indeed be associated with convergent 6-loop p-integrals at $\epsilon=0$, the $\pi$-free-basis conjecture becomes testable in the wider class of p-integrals beyond multiple zeta values.
The rational formulas could be used as a bootstrap in automated high-loop calculations: compute only the $\pi$-free hatted coefficients and then generate all $\pi$-dependent terms, effectively reducing the transcendental content that has to be calculated.
The pattern suggests a working principle that each new loop order introduces at most one new transcendental constant ($\zeta_{12}$ at weight 12) and that even zetas never appear as independent generators; whether that survives at 8 loops depends on the still-uncomputed 7-loop integrals outside $P_4/\epsilon^3$.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: the paper advances a real program. It extends the hatted-representation idea of Baikov–Chetyrkin 2018 to 6-loop correlators, produces concrete 7- and 8-loop predictions for pi-dependent terms in RG functions, and is unusually honest about what is not proven. The external tests are strong: 7-loop O(n) phi^4 results from Schnetz and large-Nf QCD checks at 7 and 8 loops all pass. That is real evidence, and the paper deserves a serious referee.

What is actually new: the first hatted representation at L=6 and (almost) L=7, the explicit 7- and 8-loop predictions, and the zeta_12 subtlety with the scenario classification. The connection between deep epsilon-expansions of 4-loop masters and finite higher-loop integrals is interesting and is stated clearly. There is no obvious circularity problem: the hatted coefficients are fitted to lower-loop data, but the target predictions are checked against independent external results, so the central checks are meaningful.

The soft spots are in proportion to how the paper frames them, but they are real. The unconditional 7-loop predictions in Section 4 require the set P6 to be pi-safe with generator set (3.13). Section 3 explicitly concedes that this generator set is not sufficient for every 6-loop p-integral — "in fact, it is not true" — and Section 2 only says P6 is "highly likely" pi-safe. So the phrase "any 1-charge minimally renormalized field model at 7 loops" is stronger than what is proven. The 8-loop block is honestly labeled as scenario-dependent, with question marks in several hatted coefficients; that is fine as a conjectural prediction, but it should not be read as established. Also, the deep epsilon-expansions from V. Smirnov appear to be private; making them public would materially help verification.

One more thing worth saying: the paper's own limitations, when read carefully, are stated better than the abstract suggests. The abstract says "predictions" and "full agreement," which is defensible. But the body is where the real caveats live, and a referee should push the authors to separate proven cases from conjectural extrapolations in the summary as clearly as they do in the technical sections.

Bottom line: this is a strong, useful paper for anyone working on high-loop RG functions or the arithmetic of Feynman integrals. I would cite it. I would bring it to reading group. I would send it to a serious referee, with a request that the private data be made available and that the distinction between theorem and well-supported conjecture be made sharper in the abstract and introduction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper extends the 'hatted representation' approach of Baikov and Chetyrkin [1] to predict π-dependent terms in the beta-function and anomalous dimensions of generic one-charge minimally renormalized field theories at 7 loops, and at 8 loops under an explicit 'conservative Scenario 2' assumption. The hatted generators are fixed using deep ε-expansions of four-loop master integrals, and the resulting algebraic relations express high-loop π-dependent RG coefficients in terms of lower-loop π-free (hatted) quantities. The authors test their predictions against the 7-loop O(n) φ^4 results of Schnetz and against large-N_f QCD results at 7 and 8 loops, reporting full agreement. The paper also discusses the structure of 6- and 7-loop p-integrals, including the role of ζ12 and the acknowledged incompleteness of the proposed generator set for all 6-loop integrals.

Significance. If the π-safety assumptions hold, the paper provides an economical and predictive scheme for obtaining π-dependent terms of high-loop RG functions without computing all master integrals directly. The explicit formulas (4.1)-(4.38) and (6.1)-(6.21) are concrete and falsifiable, and they have passed all currently available independent checks: the 7-loop O(n) φ^4 results, and 7- and 8-loop large-N_f QCD results. The observed connection between the ε-expansion of 4-loop master integrals and D=4 values of 6- and 7-loop finite p-integrals is a notable structural insight. However, the central universality claim is not proven: it rests on unproven π-safety and completeness assumptions that the authors themselves state as beliefs rather than established facts.

major comments (3)

[Section 3, eqs. (3.13) and Section 4] The claim of model-independent 7-loop predictions is conditional on an unproven assumption. The text explicitly states: 'We do not claim that the generators ... are sufficient to present the pole and finite parts of every 6-loop p-integral. In fact, it is not true [2,28,29]', and only that 'we believe that it is safe to assume that all missing irrational constants can be associated with the values of some convergent 6-loop p-integrals at ε=0.' Since eqs. (4.1)-(4.38) are derived from the hatted representation (3.1)-(3.8) fixed on the subset P4/ε^2, a 6-loop master integral containing a missing non-MZV constant could produce π-dependent terms at ε^0 that are not captured, invalidating the universal prediction for 'any 1-charge minimally renormalized field model.' The authors should either prove that the missing constants cannot affect RG functions, or explicitly present the 7-loop predictions as conditional on the π-safety of P6, as is done for the 8-loop case.
[Section 5, eqs. (5.4), (5.8), (5.9), (5.13) and Section 6] The eight-loop predictions rest on the conservative Scenario 2, but the paper does not demonstrate that the undetermined coefficients (question marks) in the hatted representation for P7 do not affect the weight-≤11 results of Section 6. Although the ζ12 terms carry weight 12, the derivation of eqs. (6.1)-(6.21) is not given, so a reader cannot verify that these coefficients do not enter through combinations with lower-weight generators. The authors should supply an explicit weight-counting argument or state precisely which unknown coefficients are assumed to vanish for the eight-loop predictions.
[Sections 4.1 and 6.1] The successful tests are limited to the O(n) φ^4 model and large-N_f QCD; they do not establish the claimed universality for any one-charge minimally renormalized field model. The paper should more carefully separate the conditional mathematical deduction from the empirical verification, and should state in the abstract or introduction that the 7- and 8-loop predictions are conjectural beyond the tested classes.

minor comments (3)

[Eq. (2.4)] Eq. (2.4) defines the hatted generator via an ε-multiplied correction term, yet several hatted formulas such as eq. (3.4) contain ε^0 shifts (e.g., −29/12 ζ8). The authors should state explicitly that the polynomials h_{iα}(ε) are allowed to contain negative powers of ε.
[Table 1] Table 1 is difficult to read in the current typesetting, particularly the L=5 and L=6 rows, which would benefit from clearer separation of the columns.
[Section 4] The conditional status of the predictions, emphasized by the admission in Section 3, should be repeated at the beginning of Section 4 before the statement that the π-dependent terms 'can straightforwardly be predicted'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the hatted representation is fitted to lower-loop p-integrals and independently tested against external 7- and 8-loop results.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The hatted representation of Section 2 is an ansatz constrained by eq. (2.5); eqs. (3.1)-(3.8) define hatted zetas by requiring that identity to hold on the subset P4/epsilon^2 of 6-loop p-integrals built from 4-loop master integrals [18]. This fitting data is lower-loop p-integral data and does not include the 7-loop or 8-loop beta-functions/anomalous dimensions whose pi-dependent terms are later predicted in Sections 4 and 6. The predictions are algebraic consequences of the hatted representation combined with the RGE theorems taken from [1], and they are then checked against independent external computations: Schnetz's 7-loop O(n) phi^4 results [2] and large-Nf QCD results [30-32,36]. Thus the target quantities are not used to fix the hatted coefficients. The paper explicitly flags its own unproven aspects: it states 'We do not claim that the generators ... are sufficient ... In fact, it is not true [2,28,29]', and the 8-loop predictions are conditional on the explicitly stated 'conservative Scenario 2'. These are honest assumptions and limitations, not circular reductions. The self-citation of [1] is load-bearing for the formalism, but the cited theorems are parameter-free, do not assume the target results, and are externally falsifiable through the successful tests; hence they count as independent support rather than circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation rests on the assumed universality of a hatted basis fitted to a subset of lower-loop integrals, plus a scenario assumption for seven-loop integrals. These are explicit in the text and are the main structural assumptions of the paper.

free parameters (2)

Hatted representation coefficients h_i_alpha(epsilon) = Rational numbers, e.g., 3/2, -5/2, 21/2 in eqs. (3.1)-(3.8)
These coefficients are chosen so that eq. (2.5) holds on a limited subset of p-integrals (P4/epsilon^n). Their universality for all p-integrals is an assumption, not a derivation.
Transcendental generator set (3.13) and (6.22) = Set of multiple zeta values: zeta_3, zeta_5, zeta_7, zeta_5,3, ...
The basis is selected by hand; the paper admits it is not sufficient for every 6-loop integral (Section 3), so the completeness of this set for RG functions is an assumption.

assumptions (3)

ad hoc to paper The set P6 of 6-loop p-integrals is pi-safe (properties (i)-(ii) of Section 2).
Assumed to hold, but verified only on the subset P4/epsilon^n. The paper states 'we have tried this subset for n=1 and 2.'
ad hoc to paper All missing irrational constants in 6-loop integrals can be associated with values of convergent 6-loop p-integrals at epsilon=0.
Explicitly stated in Section 3: 'we believe that it is safe to assume that all missing irrational constants can be associated with the values of some convergent 6-loop p-integrals at epsilon=0.' This is needed for completeness of the generator basis.
ad hoc to paper Scenario 2 for P7: hatted representation holds modulo terms of weight >= 12.
Needed for the 8-loop predictions. The paper defines three scenarios and explicitly assumes the conservative one: 'In this section we assume the conservative Scenario 2.'

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Transcendental structure of multiloop massless correlators and anomalous dimensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OWNNL7PZ

@misc{pith2026190803012,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Transcendental structure of multiloop massless correlators and anomalous dimensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OWNNL7PZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03012}
}

abstract

We give a short account of recent advances in our understanding of the $\pi$-dependent terms in massless (Euclidean) 2-point functions as well as in generic anomalous dimensions (ADs) and $\beta$-functions. We extend the considerations of \cite{Baikov:2018wgs} by two more loops, that is for the case of 6- and 7-loop correlators and 7- and 8-loop renormalization group (RG) functions. Our predictions for the ($\pi$-dependent terms) of the 7-loop RG functions for the case of the $O(n)$ $\phi^4$ theory are in full agreement with the recent results from \cite{Schnetz:2016fhy}. All available 7- and 8-loop results for QCD and the scalar $O(n)$ $\varphi^4$ theory obtained within the large $N_f$ approach to the quantum field theory (see, e.g. \cite{Gracey:2018ame}) are also in full agreement with our results.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

[1]

P. A. Baikov and K. G. Chetyrkin, The structure of generic anomalous dimensions and no- π theorem for massless propagators , JHEP 06 (2018) 141 , [ 1804.10088]

arXiv 2018
[2]

Schnetz, Numbers and Functions in Quantum Field Theory , Phys

O. Schnetz, Numbers and Functions in Quantum Field Theory , Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 085018 , [ 1606.08598]

arXiv 2018
[3]

J. A. Gracey, Large Nf quantum ﬁeld theory , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A33 (2019) 1830032 , [1812.05368]

arXiv 2019
[4]

S. G. Gorishny, A. L. Kataev and S. A. Larin, The O(α3 s) corrections to σtot(e+e− → hadrons) and σ(τ → ντ + hadrons) in QCD , Phys. Lett. B259 (1991) 144–150

work page 1991
[5]

Ayoub, Euler and the zeta function , Amer

R. Ayoub, Euler and the zeta function , Amer. Math. Monthly 81 (1974) 1067–1086 . – 16 –

work page 1974
[6]

P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin and J. H. K¨ uhn, Adler Function, Bjorken Sum Rule, and the Crewther Relation to Order α4 s in a General Gauge Theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 132004 , [ 1001.3606]

arXiv 2010
[7]

P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin and J. H. K¨ uhn, Five-loop fermion anomalous dimension for a general gauge group from four-loop massless propagators , JHEP 04 (2017) 119 , [1702.01458]

arXiv 2017
[8]

K. G. Chetyrkin, A. L. Kataev and F. V. Tkachov, New Approach to Evaluation of Multiloop Feynman Integrals: The Gegenbauer Polynomial x Space Techn ique, Nucl. Phys. B174 (1980) 345–377

work page 1980

Show all 37 references

[9]

Jamin and R

M. Jamin and R. Miravitllas, Absence of even-integer ζ-function values in Euclidean physical quantities in QCD , Phys. Lett. B779 (2018) 452–455 , [ 1711.00787]

2018 arXiv
[10]

Davies and A

J. Davies and A. Vogt, Absence of π2 terms in physical anomalous dimensions in DIS: Veriﬁcation and resulting predictions , Phys. Lett. B776 (2018) 189–194 , [ 1711.05267]

2018 arXiv
[11]

K. G. Chetyrkin, G. Falcioni, F. Herzog and J. A. M. Vermaseren , Five-loop renormalisation of QCD in covariant gauges , JHEP 10 (2017) 179 , [ 1709.08541]

2017 arXiv
[12]

Ruijl, F

B. Ruijl, F. Herzog, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren and A. Vogt, R*-operation and ﬁve-loop calculations, PoS RADCOR2017 (2018) 011 , [ 1801.06084]

2018 arXiv
[13]

Herzog, S

F. Herzog, S. Moch, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren and A. Vogt, Five-loop contributions to low-N non-singlet anomalous dimensions i n QCD , Phys. Lett. B790 (2019) 436–443 , [ 1812.11818]

2019 arXiv
[14]

P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin and J. H. K¨ uhn, Five-Loop Running of the QCD coupling constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 082002 , [ 1606.08659]

2017 arXiv
[15]

Herzog, B

F. Herzog, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren and A. Vogt, The ﬁve-loop beta function of Yang-Mills theory with fermions , 1701.01404

arXiv
[16]

Luthe, A

T. Luthe, A. Maier, P. Marquard and Y. Schroder, The ﬁve-loop Beta function for a general gauge group and anomalous dimensions beyond Feynman gauge , JHEP 10 (2017) 166 , [1709.07718]

2017 arXiv
[17]

P. A. Baikov and K. G. Chetyrkin, Four Loop Massless Propagators: An Algebraic Evaluation of All Master Integrals , Nucl. Phys. B837 (2010) 186–220 , [ 1004.1153]

2010 arXiv
[18]

R. N. Lee, A. V. Smirnov and V. A. Smirnov, Master Integrals for Four-Loop Massless Propagators up to Transcendentality Weight Twelve , Nucl. Phys. B856 (2012) 95–110 , [1108.0732]

2012 arXiv
[19]

Panzer, On the analytic computation of massless propagators in dime nsional regularization, Nucl

E. Panzer, On the analytic computation of massless propagators in dime nsional regularization, Nucl. Phys. B874 (2013) 567–593 , [ 1305.2161]

2013 arXiv
[20]

Georgoudis, V

A. Georgoudis, V. Goncalves, E. Panzer and R. Pereira, Five-loop massless propagator integrals, 1802.00803

arXiv
[21]

Brown, Feynman amplitudes, coaction principle, and cosmic Galois group, Commun

F. Brown, Feynman amplitudes, coaction principle, and cosmic Galois group, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 11 (2017) 453–556 , [ 1512.06409]

2017 arXiv
[22]

Panzer and O

E. Panzer and O. Schnetz, The Galois coaction on φ4 periods, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 11 (2017) 657–705 , [ 1603.04289]

2017 arXiv
[23]

D. J. Broadhurst and D. Kreimer, Association of multiple zeta values with positive knots via feynman diagrams up to 9 loops , Phys. Lett. B393 (1997) 403–412, [ hep-th/9609128]. – 17 –

1997 arXiv
[24]

Broadhurst, Multiple Zeta Values and Modular Forms in Quantum Field Theo ry, pp

D. Broadhurst, Multiple Zeta Values and Modular Forms in Quantum Field Theo ry, pp. 33–73. Springer Vienna, Vienna, 2013

2013
[25]

P. A. Baikov and K. G. Chetyrkin, No-π Theorem for Euclidean Massless Correlators , PoS LL2018 (2018) 008 , [ 1808.00237]

2018 arXiv
[26]

D. J. Broadhurst, Dimensionally continued multiloop gauge theory , hep-th/9909185

arXiv
[27]

Blumlein, D

J. Blumlein, D. J. Broadhurst and J. A. M. Vermaseren, The Multiple Zeta Value Data Mine , Comput. Phys. Commun. 181 (2010) 582–625 , [ 0907.2557]

2010 arXiv
[28]

D. J. Broadhurst and D. Kreimer, Knots and numbers in ϕ4 theory to 7 loops and beyond , Int. J. Mod. Phys. C6 (1995) 519–524, [ hep-ph/9504352]

1995 arXiv
[29]

Panzer, Feynman integrals and hyperlogarithms

E. Panzer, Feynman integrals and hyperlogarithms . PhD thesis, Humboldt U., Berlin, Inst. Math., 2015. 1506.07243. 10.18452/17157

2015 arXiv
[30]

Gracey, The QCD Beta function at O(1/Nf ), Phys.Lett

J. Gracey, The QCD Beta function at O(1/Nf ), Phys.Lett. B373 (1996) 178–184 , [hep-ph/9602214]

1996 arXiv
[31]

Ciuchini, S

M. Ciuchini, S. E. Derkachov, J. Gracey and A. Manashov, Quark mass anomalous dimension at O(1/N2 f ) in QCD , Phys.Lett. B458 (1999) 117–126 , [ hep-ph/9903410]

1999 arXiv
[32]

Ciuchini, S

M. Ciuchini, S. E. Derkachov, J. Gracey and A. Manashov, Computation of quark mass anomalous dimension at O(1/N2 f ) in quantum chromodynamics , Nucl.Phys. B579 (2000) 56–100 , [ hep-ph/9912221]

2000 arXiv
[33]

A. N. Vasiliev, Yu. M. Pismak and Yu. R. Khonkonen, Simple Method of Calculating the Critical Indices in the 1/ N Expansion, Theor. Math. Phys. 46 (1981) 104–113

1981
[34]

A. N. Vasiliev, Yu. M. Pismak and Yu. R. Khonkonen, 1/N Expansion: Calculation of the Exponents η and ν in the Order 1/ N 2 for Arbitrary Number of Dimensions , Theor. Math. Phys. 47 (1981) 465–475

1981
[35]

A. N. Vasiliev, Yu. M. Pismak and Yu. R. Khonkonen, 1/N Expansion: Calculation Of the Exponent η in the Order 1/N3 by the Conformal Bootstrap Method , Theor. Math. Phys. 50 (1982) 127–134

1982
[36]

D. J. Broadhurst, J. A. Gracey and D. Kreimer, Beyond the triangle and uniqueness relations: Nonzeta counterterms at large N from positive kn ots, Z. Phys. C75 (1997) 559–574 , [ hep-th/9607174]

1997 arXiv
[37]

A. V. Kotikov and S. Teber, On the Landau-Khalatnikov-Fradkin transformation and the mystery of even ζ-values in Euclidean massless correlators , 1906.10930. – 18 –

1906 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

P. A. Baikov and K. G. Chetyrkin, The structure of generic anomalous dimensions and no- π theorem for massless propagators , JHEP 06 (2018) 141 , [ 1804.10088]

arXiv 2018

[2] [2]

Schnetz, Numbers and Functions in Quantum Field Theory , Phys

O. Schnetz, Numbers and Functions in Quantum Field Theory , Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 085018 , [ 1606.08598]

arXiv 2018

[3] [3]

J. A. Gracey, Large Nf quantum ﬁeld theory , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A33 (2019) 1830032 , [1812.05368]

arXiv 2019

[4] [4]

S. G. Gorishny, A. L. Kataev and S. A. Larin, The O(α3 s) corrections to σtot(e+e− → hadrons) and σ(τ → ντ + hadrons) in QCD , Phys. Lett. B259 (1991) 144–150

work page 1991

[5] [5]

Ayoub, Euler and the zeta function , Amer

R. Ayoub, Euler and the zeta function , Amer. Math. Monthly 81 (1974) 1067–1086 . – 16 –

work page 1974

[6] [6]

P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin and J. H. K¨ uhn, Adler Function, Bjorken Sum Rule, and the Crewther Relation to Order α4 s in a General Gauge Theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 132004 , [ 1001.3606]

arXiv 2010

[7] [7]

P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin and J. H. K¨ uhn, Five-loop fermion anomalous dimension for a general gauge group from four-loop massless propagators , JHEP 04 (2017) 119 , [1702.01458]

arXiv 2017

[8] [8]

K. G. Chetyrkin, A. L. Kataev and F. V. Tkachov, New Approach to Evaluation of Multiloop Feynman Integrals: The Gegenbauer Polynomial x Space Techn ique, Nucl. Phys. B174 (1980) 345–377

work page 1980