Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 94 references

Soliton formation is a phase-separation process driven by sound-mode instability, and cylindrical soliton strings break up like liquid jets.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 10:09 UTC pith:PO7N65MA

load-bearing objection A clean linear-instability analysis of Q-matter with a suggestive but undemonstrated claim that soliton formation is driven by sound modes; the membrane-instability part is the stronger half. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2510.11244 v3 pith:PO7N65MA submitted 2025-10-13 hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph

Hydrodynamic properties in soliton field theory

classification hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph MSC 35Q5176E17
keywords solitonsQ-ballsQ-stringshydrodynamic instabilitysound mode instabilityRayleigh-Plateau instabilityphase separationYoung-Laplace relation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that solitons in a complex scalar field theory—localized, charge-carrying lumps such as Q-balls—are not a mystery of nonlinear fields but a hydrodynamic phenomenon. It shows that a homogeneous 'soliton fluid' becomes unstable when its effective speed of sound squared turns negative, exactly like a thermodynamically unstable fluid. This sound-mode instability breaks spatial symmetry and drives phase separation into coexisting matter and vacuum phases, producing solitons, vacuum bubbles, and their interfaces. The interface is then shown to obey a Young-Laplace relation, and cylindrical soliton strings (Q-strings) suffer a Rayleigh-Plateau instability that splits them into spheres, just like a falling water jet.

Core claim

The central claim is that the essential mechanism of soliton formation is the sound mode instability induced by thermodynamic instability. For a homogeneous condensate of a complex scalar field with a U(1) symmetry, linear perturbations have two long-wavelength modes: a non-hydrodynamic 'tachyonic' mode and a hydrodynamic sound mode. When the effective potential's curvature makes the squared speed of sound v_s^2 = m_U^2/m_V^2 negative, the sound mode grows exponentially. This instability, rather than negative pressure alone, drives the condensate to separate into phases with distinct thermodynamic properties—a matter phase and a vacuum phase—connected by an interface with surface tension. Th

What carries the argument

The key object is the linearized dispersion relation of perturbations around a homogeneous condensate, in particular the hydrodynamic sound mode with squared speed v_s^2 = m_U^2/m_V^2, where m_U^2 and m_V^2 are squared effective masses associated with the scalar potential V(|ψ|) and the effective potential U = V - ω^2ϕ^2. The sign of v_s^2 controls thermodynamic stability: negative v_s^2 yields sound-mode instability. The second piece is the Young-Laplace-type relation for the soliton interface, p = γ D/R in the thin-wall limit, where γ is the surface tension and D/R is the principal curvature, which yields the Rayleigh-Plateau dispersion relation for perturbations of cylindrical interfaces.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the linear sound-mode instability actually drives the fully nonlinear evolution to a localized soliton or vacuum-bubble phase-separated state; the paper concedes that some pathways, particularly the tachyonic-to-sound-mode route, 'require further verification through numerical simulations.'

What would settle it

A numerical solution of the full nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation starting from a homogeneous condensate in the sound-mode-unstable parameter regime that does not produce localized solitons but instead relaxes to a different homogeneous or turbulent state would falsify the phase-separation claim. Similarly, a high-resolution simulation of a cylindrical Q-string with length > 2πR that fails to show breakup into spheres would falsify the membrane-instability claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Q-ball formation from a homogeneous scalar condensate in early-universe models is reinterpreted as phase separation induced by sound-mode instability rather than by negative pressure alone.
  • Vacuum bubbles—vacuum phase surrounded by negative-pressure matter—arise naturally from phase separation and may model the expansion of the early universe.
  • Cylindrical Q-strings longer than their circumference are predicted to be dynamically unstable and to fragment into spherical Q-balls, analogous to liquid-jet breakup.
  • The soliton interface carries a geometry-dependent surface tension, so surface energy is not simply proportional to surface area; the instability minimizes area rather than energy.
  • A stable negative-pressure soliton fluid is suggested as a dark energy candidate, with vacuum bubbles as the final phase-separated state.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the sound-mode-instability picture is correct, the dispersion relation's fastest-growing wavelength should predict the dominant Q-ball size in full nonlinear simulations of scalar condensates, providing a direct quantitative test.
  • The threshold λ_c = 2πR for Q-string instability suggests that filamentary structures seen in previous Q-ball formation simulations may already have been a manifestation of this membrane instability.
  • Beyond the thin-wall limit, the geometry-dependent surface tension introduced here implies that soliton interfaces may exhibit dynamical effects analogous to Marangoni flows, though the paper does not develop this.
  • The proposed duality could be extended to other interface-dominated systems, such as boson stars or black-string analogues, where a similar Rayleigh-Plateau-type breakup is known or suspected.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that two classical hydrodynamic instabilities—sound-mode instability and Rayleigh-Plateau membrane instability—also govern the formation and dynamics of nontopological solitons in complex scalar field theory. For homogeneous soliton fluids, it derives the linear perturbation determinant (Eq. 3.14) and identifies a hydrodynamic mode with sound-like dispersion (Eq. 3.15b). A negative squared speed of sound is linked to thermodynamic instability, and the paper claims this instability drives phase separation into coexisting matter/vacuum phases, i.e., Q-balls, vacuum bubbles, and related structures. For Q-strings, the paper derives a Young-Laplace-type pressure relation (Eq. 4.9) and, in the thin-wall/incompressible/zero-thickness approximation, obtains the membrane-instability dispersion relation (Eq. 4.24), which reduces to the Rayleigh-Plateau form. It also discusses surface-area versus surface-energy evolution and outlines cosmic and gravitational applications.

Significance. If the formation mechanism were established, the paper would provide a unified hydrodynamic picture of soliton formation and interface dynamics, extending prior work on Q-string instabilities to a broader framework. The linear dispersion-relation derivations are parameter-free and internally consistent, and the membrane-instability result is supported by numerical solutions of the linearized Klein-Gordon equation (Fig. 9). The paper also makes a concrete, falsifiable prediction: that homogeneous excited states with negative dp/dε exhibit long-wavelength exponential growth at a rate set by Eq. (3.15b), and that Q-strings longer than their circumference break up. These are valuable contributions even without a full nonlinear proof. However, the central claim that the sound-mode instability actually produces solitons through phase separation is currently an inference from linear instability and fluid analogies, not a demonstrated nonlinear outcome; the text itself concedes that some proposed pathways require numerical verification. The manuscript would be suitable for publication if the central claim is reframed as a proposed mechanism supported by linear analysis, or if the nonlinear

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.4, §5, and abstract] The paper's central claim—that the sound-mode instability 'triggers phase separation, where new thermal phases are generated to produce solitons'—is asserted as a demonstrated mechanism, but no nonlinear evolution of the Klein-Gordon system (3.6) or (1.4) is presented. The only numerical result in the paper (Fig. 9) concerns the linearized membrane instability of a pre-existing Q-string, not formation. Moreover, §3.4 itself states that the latter two evolution scenarios 'require further verification through numerical simulations,' implicitly acknowledging the absence of nonlinear proof. Since linear growth could saturate into a different homogeneous state, a spinodal network, or radiation, the existence of growing sound modes does not establish the phase-separation endpoint. I recommend either adding direct numerical simulations of the homogeneous condensate's nonlinear evolution in the
  2. [§4.2, Eqs. (4.10)–(4.24)] The analytical derivation of the Q-string membrane dispersion relation rests on three assumptions introduced ad hoc: zero interface thickness (4.10), incompressible interior (∂tφin=∂tϑ=0, Eq. 4.15), and the step-function/delta-function representation of the profile. The paper acknowledges that the resulting surface tension (4.11) is 'not rigorously well-defined.' While the comparison with full linearized numerics in Fig. 9 is encouraging and partially validates the result, the domain of validity of these approximations is not quantified. The derivation would be much stronger if the limits γ/ε0→0 and interface width/R→0 were framed as a matched asymptotic expansion, and if Fig. 9 or a supplementary figure explicitly showed the parameter boundary where Eq. (4.24) and the exact linearized result start to deviate.
  3. [§3.4 'the only possible candidates' and §5 'vacuum bubbles are naturally predicted'] The assertion that 'the only possible candidates for such thermal phases are the vacuum phase and the ground-state non-vacuum phase' is a conclusion drawn from equilibrium thermodynamics of the homogeneous branches, not from the dynamics. Nonlinear field evolution might produce localized oscillating states, quasi-breathers, or other non-thermal structures that are not captured by this dichotomy. Similarly, the prediction of vacuum bubbles as 'naturally predicted' by phase separation is an interpretation, not a derived dynamical consequence. These statements should be qualified as expected outcomes based on the linear instability and thermodynamic analogy, pending nonlinear verification.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.3, Eq. (3.18b)] The rescaling for V2 introduces the parameter K in two different roles: as the original coefficient of the constant term and as an exponent in the rescaling factors. This is notationally confusing. I suggest using a different symbol, e.g., k0, for the constant term, or explicitly stating the dimensionless K after rescaling.
  2. [§4.2, Eq. (4.11)] The integral defining the surface tension γ is divergent in the zero-thickness limit, as the paper notes. Please clarify whether this is treated as a formal expression with an implicit finite-width regulator, and specify how the numerical comparison in Fig. 9 handles this divergence (e.g., using a finite-thickness Q-string profile).
  3. [Fig. 9] The figure caption says 'Dots of different colors correspond to different oscillation frequencies,' but the plot lacks a legend and axis labels are absent. Adding a legend and labeled axes would make the numerical agreement between the dots and the analytical line quantitatively assessable.
  4. [§4.3, Eqs. (4.27)–(4.28)] The derivation of the second-order radius perturbation (4.25) from particle-number conservation is asserted rather than shown. A short derivation of the −1/(4R0) δR² term would help the reader verify the subsequent surface-area and surface-energy formulas.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: derivations are self-contained; the unverified nonlinear formation step is a limitation, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The dispersion relations in §3.2 are obtained by substituting the perturbation ansatz (3.12) into the field equations (3.6), giving the determinant condition (3.14) and the long-wavelength modes (3.15); no parameter is fitted and the coefficient v_s^2 = dp/dε = m_U^2/m_V^2 arises algebraically from the hydrodynamic map (§3.1), not as an input. The membrane-instability dispersion relation (4.24) is likewise derived from the linearized Klein-Gordon system under explicitly stated thin-wall/incompressibility assumptions, and Fig. 9 checks it against numerical solution of the unapproximated linearized equation, so the prior self-citation [12] is not load-bearing. The Young-Laplace-type relation (4.9) follows from the stationary field equation; the subsequent thin-wall reduction p = γD/R uses the definitions of γ and the interface pressure, but the physical content is the derived pressure-balance identity, not an assumed equation. The central claim that the sound-mode instability causes soliton formation is not fully verified — §3.4 concedes that two evolution scenarios "require further verification through numerical simulations" — but that is a limitation or correctness risk about nonlinear dynamics, not a circular reduction of the claimed result to its inputs. The paper's analytic derivations are internally consistent and self-contained, so the circularity score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 6 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central derivations use model potentials with parameters κ and K chosen by hand but not fitted to data. The main assumptions are the fluid mapping of the complex scalar, the phase-equilibrium condition, the ad hoc linear-to-nonlinear phase-separation inference, and the thin-wall/incompressibility approximations for the Q-string dispersion. The vacuum-bubble configuration is the only newly postulated physical structure, and it lacks independent evidence beyond the paper's own analysis.

free parameters (3)
  • κ (sextic coefficient in V1 = φ^2 - φ^4 + κφ^6) = 0.5 in figures; critical value κ_c ≈ 0.36338998 derived from energy-density crossing
    Model parameter, not fitted to data; the classification into sound-mode versus tachyonic instability regimes depends on its value.
  • K (coefficient of flat/exponential term in V2 = φ^2 + K + φ^6) = -0.1 in figures; |K| << 1
    Model parameter controlling the V2 potential; not fitted to data.
  • ω (soliton oscillation frequency / chemical potential) = varies by branch; e.g. ω^2 ranges in (V'_1m, 1) for V1
    Labels homogeneous phases and soliton branches; not fitted — a physical input parameter of the family of solutions.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption A complex scalar field in amplitude-phase form maps to an irrotational relativistic fluid in the Eckart frame.
    Section 3.1, Eq. (3.3), sets u^μ = ∂^μϑ/ϑ̃; relies on prior fluid/scalar correspondences (refs. [57,59]).
  • domain assumption Uniform phases satisfy ω^2 = V'(φ^2), and the grand potential F = ε - ωn = -p controls phase equilibrium.
    Section 3.1, Eq. (3.7), and §3.4; standard for Q-matter but essential to the phase-separation argument.
  • ad hoc to paper Sound-mode instability of a homogeneous condensate leads to nonlinear phase separation into vacuum and non-vacuum ground-state domains.
    Section 3.4 asserts this transition without solving the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation; the paper notes two pathways require numerical verification.
  • ad hoc to paper Zero-thickness interface (step function X) and incompressible interior for the Q-string perturbation analysis.
    Section 4.2, Eqs. (4.10)-(4.15); the paper acknowledges delta functions are not rigorously well-defined.
  • standard math Standard relativistic dissipative-fluid framework (Müller-Israel-Stewart / second-order entropy current).
    Section 2.1 is a review of the known fluid framework; the paper assumes these standard thermodynamic and transport results.
  • domain assumption The spectral numerical method used for Fig. 9 accurately solves the linearized Klein-Gordon equation.
    Section 4.2, Fig. 9; no code, data, or error analysis is provided to independently verify the numerical solver.
invented entities (1)
  • Vacuum bubbles (vacuum core surrounded by negative-pressure matter phase) no independent evidence
    purpose: Predicted phase-separation configurations where the vacuum phase is inside and matter with negative pressure is outside; suggested as an analogue of expanding-vacuum / dark-energy scenarios.
    Section 3.4 and Fig. 8 predict them analytically, but no numerical or observational verification is provided, and no falsifiable signature outside the model is given.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 38044 in / 17817 out tokens · 148012 ms · 2026-08-04T10:09:54.148874+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The crucial role of hydrodynamic instabilities in soliton field theory is revealed. We demonstrate that the essential of soliton formation mechanism is the sound mode instability induced by thermodynamic instability. This instability triggers phase separation, where new thermal phases are generated to produce solitons. These solitons can be regarded as a coexistence state composed of a matter phase and a vacuum phase, with an interface providing surface tension to maintain dynamical equilibrium. The phase separation mechanism naturally allows the existence of vacuum bubbles, characterized by a vacuum phase surrounded by a matter phase with negative pressure. Furthermore, we show that the soliton interface resembles a fluid membrane, whose interface pressure satisfies a Young-Laplace-type relation, resulting in the emergence of the membrane instability induced by surface tension. In the thin-wall limit, the dispersion relation is analytically derived. This instability triggers topological transition of the interface, splitting a cylindrical interface into multiple spheres with a smaller total surface area. Such results highlight the duality between solitons and fluids, providing a field theory description for hydrodynamics with interfaces.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 54 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Baym, B.L

    G. Baym, B.L. Friman, J.P. Blaizot, M. Soyeur and W. Czyz,Hydrodynamics of Ultrarelativistic Heavy Ion Collisions,Nucl. Phys. A407(1983) 541

  2. [2]

    Heinz and R

    U. Heinz and R. Snellings,Collective flow and viscosity in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.63(2013) 123 [1301.2826]

  3. [3]

    C. Gale, S. Jeon and B. Schenke,Hydrodynamic Modeling of Heavy-Ion Collisions,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A28(2013) 1340011 [1301.5893]

  4. [4]

    Damour,Black Hole Eddy Currents,Phys

    T. Damour,Black Hole Eddy Currents,Phys. Rev. D18(1978) 3598

  5. [5]

    Thorne, R.H

    K.S. Thorne, R.H. Price and D.A. Macdonald,Black holes: the membrane paradigm, Yale university press, New Haven (1986)

  6. [6]

    Parikh and F

    M. Parikh and F. Wilczek,An Action for black hole membranes,Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 064011 [gr-qc/9712077]

  7. [7]

    Policastro, D.T

    G. Policastro, D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets,The shear viscosity of strongly coupled N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma,Phys. Rev. Lett.87(2001) 081601 [hep-th/0104066]

  8. [8]

    Baier, P

    R. Baier, P. Romatschke, D.T. Son, A.O. Starinets and M.A. Stephanov,Relativistic viscous hydrodynamics, conformal invariance, and holography,JHEP04(2008) 100 [0712.2451]

  9. [9]

    Bhattacharyya, V.E

    S. Bhattacharyya, V.E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla and M. Rangamani,Nonlinear Fluid Dynamics from Gravity,JHEP02(2008) 045 [0712.2456]

  10. [10]

    Kovtun, D.T

    P. Kovtun, D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets,Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics,Phys. Rev. Lett.94(2005) 111601 [hep-th/0405231]

  11. [11]

    Coleman,Q-balls,Nucl

    S.R. Coleman,Q-balls,Nucl. Phys. B262(1985) 263

  12. [12]

    Chen,Hydrodynamic and Rayleigh-Plateau Instabilities of Q Strings,Phys

    Q. Chen,Hydrodynamic and Rayleigh-Plateau Instabilities of Q Strings,Phys. Rev. Lett.134 (2025) 211603 [2412.09815]

  13. [13]

    Andersson and G.L

    N. Andersson and G.L. Comer,Relativistic fluid dynamics: Physics for many different scales, Living Rev. Rel.10(2007) 1 [gr-qc/0605010]

  14. [14]

    Kapitsa,Viscosity of liquid helium below theλ-point,Nature141(1938) 74

    P. Kapitsa,Viscosity of liquid helium below theλ-point,Nature141(1938) 74

  15. [15]

    Reynolds,XXIX

    O. Reynolds,XXIX. An experimental investigation of the circumstances which determine whether the motion of water shall be direct or sinuous, and of the law of resistance in parallel channels,Philosophical Transactions of the Royal society of London174(1883) 935

  16. [16]

    Heller, R.A

    M.P. Heller, R.A. Janik and P. Witaszczyk,Hydrodynamic Gradient Expansion in Gauge Theory Plasmas,Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 211602 [1302.0697]

  17. [17]

    Heller and M

    M.P. Heller and M. Spalinski,Hydrodynamics Beyond the Gradient Expansion: Resurgence and Resummation,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 072501 [1503.07514]

  18. [18]

    Romatschke,Relativistic Fluid Dynamics Far From Local Equilibrium,Phys

    P. Romatschke,Relativistic Fluid Dynamics Far From Local Equilibrium,Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(2018) 012301 [1704.08699]. – 41 –

  19. [19]

    Euler,Principes g´ en´ eraux du mouvement des fluides,M´ emoires de l’acad´ emie des sciences de Berlin11(1755) 274

    L. Euler,Principes g´ en´ eraux du mouvement des fluides,M´ emoires de l’acad´ emie des sciences de Berlin11(1755) 274

  20. [20]

    Navier,M´ emoire sur les lois du mouvement des fluides,M´ emoires de l’Acad´ emie Royale des Sciences de l’Institut de France6(1823) 389

    C.L.M.H. Navier,M´ emoire sur les lois du mouvement des fluides,M´ emoires de l’Acad´ emie Royale des Sciences de l’Institut de France6(1823) 389

  21. [21]

    G.G. Stokes,On the theories of the internal friction of fluids in motion, and of the equilibrium and motion of elastic solids,Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 8(1845) 287

  22. [22]

    Eckart,The Thermodynamics of irreversible processes

    C. Eckart,The Thermodynamics of irreversible processes. III. Relativistic theory of the simple fluid,Phys. Rev.58(1940) 919

  23. [23]

    Landau and E.M

    L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz,Fluid Mechanics, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1959)

  24. [24]

    Hiscock and L

    W.A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom,Linear plane waves in dissipative relativistic fluids,Phys. Rev. D35(1987) 3723

  25. [25]

    Hiscock and L

    W.A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom,Generic instabilities in first-order dissipative relativistic fluid theories,Phys. Rev. D31(1985) 725

  26. [26]

    Muller,Zum Paradoxon der Warmeleitungstheorie,Z

    I. Muller,Zum Paradoxon der Warmeleitungstheorie,Z. Phys.198(1967) 329

  27. [27]

    Israel,Nonstationary irreversible thermodynamics: A Causal relativistic theory,Annals Phys.100(1976) 310

    W. Israel,Nonstationary irreversible thermodynamics: A Causal relativistic theory,Annals Phys.100(1976) 310

  28. [28]

    Israel and J.M

    W. Israel and J.M. Stewart,Thermodynamics of nonstationary and transient effects in a relativistic gas,Phys. Lett. A58(1976) 213

  29. [29]

    Israel and J.M

    W. Israel and J.M. Stewart,Transient relativistic thermodynamics and kinetic theory,Annals Phys.118(1979) 341

  30. [30]

    Young,An essay on the cohesion of fluids,Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London95(1805) 65–87

    T. Young,An essay on the cohesion of fluids,Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London95(1805) 65–87

  31. [31]

    Laplace,Trait´ e de M´ ecanique C´ eleste, Courcier, Paris (1805)

    P.S. Laplace,Trait´ e de M´ ecanique C´ eleste, Courcier, Paris (1805)

  32. [32]

    Cahn and J.E

    J.W. Cahn and J.E. Hilliard,Free energy of a nonuniform system. i. interfacial free energy, The Journal of chemical physics28(1958) 258

  33. [33]

    Lowengrub and L

    J. Lowengrub and L. Truskinovsky,Quasi–incompressible cahn–hilliard fluids and topological transitions,Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences454(1998) 2617

  34. [34]

    Russell,Report on waves,Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science14(1844) 311

    J.S. Russell,Report on waves,Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science14(1844) 311

  35. [35]

    Boussinesq,Essai sur la th´ eorie des eaux courantes, Imprimerie nationale, Paris (1877)

    J. Boussinesq,Essai sur la th´ eorie des eaux courantes, Imprimerie nationale, Paris (1877)

  36. [36]

    Strutt and L

    J.W. Strutt and L. Rayleigh,On waves,Philosophical Magazine1(1876) 257

  37. [37]

    Korteweg and G

    D.J. Korteweg and G. De Vries,Xli. on the change of form of long waves advancing in a rectangular canal, and on a new type of long stationary waves,The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science39(1895) 422

  38. [38]

    Manton and P

    N. Manton and P. Sutcliffe,Topological solitons, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

  39. [39]

    Lee and Y

    T.D. Lee and Y. Pang,Nontopological solitons,Phys. Rept.221(1992) 251. – 42 –

  40. [40]

    Zhou,Non-topological solitons and quasi-solitons,Rept

    S.-Y. Zhou,Non-topological solitons and quasi-solitons,Rept. Prog. Phys.88(2025) 046901 [2411.16604]

  41. [41]

    Kusenko,Solitons in the supersymmetric extensions of the standard model,Phys

    A. Kusenko,Solitons in the supersymmetric extensions of the standard model,Phys. Lett. B 405(1997) 108 [hep-ph/9704273]

  42. [42]

    Frieman, G.B

    J.A. Frieman, G.B. Gelmini, M. Gleiser and E.W. Kolb,Solitogenesis: Primordial Origin of Nontopological Solitons,Phys. Rev. Lett.60(1988) 2101

  43. [43]

    Kusenko and M.E

    A. Kusenko and M.E. Shaposhnikov,Supersymmetric Q balls as dark matter,Phys. Lett. B 418(1998) 46 [hep-ph/9709492]

  44. [44]

    Enqvist and J

    K. Enqvist and J. McDonald,Q balls and baryogenesis in the MSSM,Phys. Lett. B425 (1998) 309 [hep-ph/9711514]

  45. [45]

    Enqvist and J

    K. Enqvist and J. McDonald,B - ball baryogenesis and the baryon to dark matter ratio, Nucl. Phys. B538(1999) 321 [hep-ph/9803380]

  46. [46]

    Kusenko and P.J

    A. Kusenko and P.J. Steinhardt,Q ball candidates for selfinteracting dark matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.87(2001) 141301 [astro-ph/0106008]

  47. [47]

    Kusenko and A

    A. Kusenko and A. Mazumdar,Gravitational waves from fragmentation of a primordial scalar condensate into Q-balls,Phys. Rev. Lett.101(2008) 211301 [0807.4554]

  48. [48]

    Lynn,Q STARS,Nucl

    B.W. Lynn,Q STARS,Nucl. Phys. B321(1989) 465

  49. [49]

    Axenides, E

    M. Axenides, E. Floratos, S. Komineas and L. Perivolaropoulos,Metastable ringlike semitopological solitons,Phys. Rev. Lett.86(2001) 4459 [hep-ph/0101193]

  50. [50]

    Rosen,Particlelike Solutions to Nonlinear Complex Scalar Field Theories with Positive-Definite Energy Densities,J

    G. Rosen,Particlelike Solutions to Nonlinear Complex Scalar Field Theories with Positive-Definite Energy Densities,J. Math. Phys.9(1968) 996

  51. [51]

    Affleck and M

    I. Affleck and M. Dine,A New Mechanism for Baryogenesis,Nucl. Phys. B249(1985) 361

  52. [52]

    Kasuya and M

    S. Kasuya and M. Kawasaki,Q ball formation through Affleck-Dine mechanism,Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 041301 [hep-ph/9909509]

  53. [53]

    Kasuya and M

    S. Kasuya and M. Kawasaki,Q Ball formation in the gravity mediated SUSY breaking scenario,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 023512 [hep-ph/0002285]

  54. [54]

    Lee,Quantum tunnelings with global charge,Phys

    K.-M. Lee,Quantum tunnelings with global charge,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 5333 [hep-ph/9404293]

  55. [55]

    Heeck and M

    J. Heeck and M. Sokhashvili,Q-balls in polynomial potentials,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 016006 [2211.00021]

  56. [56]

    Crossley, P

    M. Crossley, P. Glorioso and H. Liu,Effective field theory of dissipative fluids,JHEP09 (2017) 095 [1511.03646]

  57. [57]

    Madsen,Scalar Fields in Curved Space-times,Class

    M.S. Madsen,Scalar Fields in Curved Space-times,Class. Quant. Grav.5(1988) 627

  58. [58]

    Weinberg,Cosmology, Oxford University Press, New York (2008)

    S. Weinberg,Cosmology, Oxford University Press, New York (2008)

  59. [59]

    Su´ arez and P.-H

    A. Su´ arez and P.-H. Chavanis,Hydrodynamic representation of the Klein-Gordon-Einstein equations in the weak field limit: General formalism and perturbations analysis,Phys. Rev. D 92(2015) 023510 [1503.07437]

  60. [60]

    Armas, J

    J. Armas, J. Bhattacharya and N. Kundu,Surface transport in plasma-balls,JHEP06 (2016) 015 [1512.08514]. – 43 –

  61. [61]

    Armas, J

    J. Armas, J. Bhattacharya, A. Jain and N. Kundu,On the surface of superfluids,JHEP06 (2017) 090 [1612.08088]

  62. [62]

    Attems, Y

    M. Attems, Y. Bea, J. Casalderrey-Solana, D. Mateos, M. Triana and M. Zilh˜ ao,Holographic Collisions across a Phase Transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 261601 [1807.05175]

  63. [63]

    Y. Bea, J. Casalderrey-Solana, T. Giannakopoulos, A. Jansen, D. Mateos, M. Sanchez-Garitaonandia et al.,Holographic bubbles with Jecco: expanding, collapsing and critical,JHEP09(2022) 008 [2202.10503]

  64. [64]

    Hiscock and L

    W.A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom,Stability and causality in dissipative relativistic fluids, Annals Phys.151(1983) 466

  65. [65]

    Gubser and A

    S.S. Gubser and A. Nellore,Mimicking the QCD equation of state with a dual black hole, Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 086007 [0804.0434]

  66. [66]

    Janik, J

    R.A. Janik, J. Jankowski and H. Soltanpanahi,Nonequilibrium Dynamics and Phase Transitions in Holographic Models,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 091603 [1512.06871]

  67. [67]

    Janik, J

    R.A. Janik, J. Jankowski and H. Soltanpanahi,Real-Time dynamics and phase separation in a holographic first order phase transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 261601 [1704.05387]

  68. [68]

    Mariotte,Trait´ e du mouvement des eaux et des autres corps fluides, A Paris: Chez Jean Jombert, Paris (1700)

    E. Mariotte,Trait´ e du mouvement des eaux et des autres corps fluides, A Paris: Chez Jean Jombert, Paris (1700)

  69. [69]

    Savart,M´ emoire sur la Constitution des Veines liquides lanc´ ees par des orifices circulaires en mince paroi,Annales de chimie et de physique53(1833) 337

    F. Savart,M´ emoire sur la Constitution des Veines liquides lanc´ ees par des orifices circulaires en mince paroi,Annales de chimie et de physique53(1833) 337

  70. [70]

    J. Plateau,Recherches exp´ erimentales et th´ eoriques sur les figures d’´ equilibre d’une masse liquide sans pesanteur (deuxi` eme s´ erie),M´ emoires de l’Acad´ emie Royale de Belgique23 (1849) 1

  71. [71]

    Rayleigh,On the instability of jets,Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society1 (1878) 4

    L. Rayleigh,On the instability of jets,Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society1 (1878) 4

  72. [72]

    Rayleigh,On the instability of a cylinder of viscous liquid under capillary force,The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science34(1892) 145

    L. Rayleigh,On the instability of a cylinder of viscous liquid under capillary force,The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science34(1892) 145

  73. [73]

    Doneva, F.M

    D.D. Doneva, F.M. Ramazano˘ glu, H.O. Silva, T.P. Sotiriou and S.S. Yazadjiev,Spontaneous scalarization,Rev. Mod. Phys.96(2024) 015004 [2211.01766]

  74. [74]

    M. Dine, L. Randall and S.D. Thomas,Baryogenesis from flat directions of the supersymmetric standard model,Nucl. Phys. B458(1996) 291 [hep-ph/9507453]

  75. [75]

    Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,Phys

    A.H. Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 347

  76. [76]

    Mai and P

    M. Mai and P. Schweitzer,Radial excitations of Q-balls, and their D-term,Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 096002 [1206.2930]

  77. [77]

    Heeck, A

    J. Heeck, A. Rajaraman, R. Riley and C.B. Verhaaren,Understanding Q-Balls Beyond the Thin-Wall Limit,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 045008 [2009.08462]

  78. [78]

    Enqvist, A

    K. Enqvist, A. Jokinen, T. Multamaki and I. Vilja,Numerical simulations of fragmentation of the Affleck-Dine condensate,Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 083501 [hep-ph/0011134]

  79. [79]

    Hiramatsu, M

    T. Hiramatsu, M. Kawasaki and F. Takahashi,Numerical study of Q-ball formation in gravity mediation,JCAP06(2010) 008 [1003.1779]. – 44 –

  80. [80]

    Battye and P

    R. Battye and P. Sutcliffe,Q-ball dynamics,Nucl. Phys. B590(2000) 329 [hep-th/0003252]

Showing first 80 references.