Many-Body Entanglement in Solid-State Emitters

Alexander Senichev; Alexandra Boltasseva; Arshag Danageozian; Bennet Windt; Chanchal; Christian M. Lange; Chuchuan Hong; Emma Daggett; Jelena Vu\v{c}kovi\'c; Jonas M. Peterson

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 298 references

Many-Body Entanglement in Solid-State Emitters

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Solid-state quantum emitters are now on a credible path to scalable many-body entangled photonic states, argues this review.

desk verdict A broad, honestly caveated review with no new results; the main flaw is that the g(2) anti-dip caveat is stated in one section and ignored in another. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.20797 v1 pith:PP5A2SPD submitted 2025-11-25 quant-ph

Emma Daggett , Christian M. Lange , Bennet Windt , Arshag Danageozian , Alexander Senichev , Jordi Arnau Montañà-López , Chanchal , Kinjol Barua

show 18 more authors

Xingyu Gao Zhaoyun Zheng Vijin Kizhake Veetil Souvik Biswas Jonas M. Peterson Na Liu Chuchuan Hong Teri Odom Matthew Pelton Tongcang Li Jelena Vučković Vladamir Shalaev Alexandra Boltasseva Sophia E. Economou Jonathan D. Hood Valentin Walther Rahul Trivedi Libai Huang

This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-ph

keywords many-bodyentanglementsolid-statequantumemitterssuperradiancephotonicgraphstatesdecoherencenanophotonicsdotscolorcenters

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review makes the case that solid-state quantum emitters—color centers in diamond and silicon carbide, epitaxial quantum dots, organic molecules, and 2D semiconductors—have advanced to the point where the building blocks for many-body entanglement are no longer theoretical abstractions. The paper's central claim is that by engineering collective light–matter interactions, either through direct dipole–dipole coupling or through shared nanophotonic cavity and waveguide modes, one can generate entangled states of light and matter at scale: superradiant bursts, photonic cluster and graph states, and emergent quantum phases. It surveys the experimental milestones that support this claim, including two-emitter superradiance and subradiance, cavity-mediated coupling of silicon-vacancy centers, deterministic cluster-state generation from quantum dots, and Rydberg-exciton polariton nonlinearities. The review identifies inhomogeneous broadening and environmental decoherence as the central obstacles, and argues that tuning techniques (Stark shifts, strain, phononic bandgaps) and coherence protection are pulling these systems toward the fidelity required for fault-tolerant operation. A sympathetic reader comes away with the conclusion that scalable many-body entangled photonic states are a credible near-term target rather than a distant dream.

What carries the argument

The electromagnetic Green's function G(ri, rj), which links the field at one emitter's position to the dipole of another, is the central object. Its real and imaginary parts define the coherent (Jij) and dissipative (Gammaij) couplings that appear in the many-emitter master equation. This single mechanism unifies the phenomena the review surveys: spectral splittings in two-emitter experiments are the coherent part of the interaction; modified decay rates (superradiance and subradiance) are the dissipative part; and cavity- or waveguide-mediated couplings extend these interactions over many wavelengths. Nanophotonic structures—photonic crystal cavities, ring resonators, waveguides, and plasmo

What would settle it

Measure the second-order correlation function of the two-emitter silicon-carbide microdisk experiment while rapidly tuning the two emitters far apart in frequency; if the g(2)(0) anti-dip survives when the emitters are independent, the effect is not collective. More generally, a complete model of non-interacting emitters under the same detection and spectral-diffusion conditions that reproduces the observed coincidence dip would falsify the superradiance claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The review's load-bearing assertion is that the field has reached a turning point: individual solid-state emitters can be made nearly transform-limited, and the interactions needed to entangle many of them have now been demonstrated in a diverse set of platforms. The central mechanism is photon-mediated coupling, captured by an effective master equation in which the electromagnetic Green's function dictates both coherent exchange (the real part, Jij) and collective dissipation (the imaginary part, Gammaij). Realizing the right Green's function through cavities, waveguides, or plasmonic structures converts a disordered ensemble into a correlated quantum system, producing superradiant and subr

Load-bearing premise

The review's evidence base rests on interpreting spectral splittings, modified decay rates, and photon-correlation signatures (especially a dip in g(2)(0)) as proof of collective quantum behavior; if that interpretive link is weaker than assumed—as the review itself notes for the anti-dip case—several showcased demonstrations would not establish the many-body entanglement they are claimed to show.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Superradiant emission from dense emitter ensembles can provide quantum-enhanced phase sensitivity (Heisenberg scaling of the quantum Fisher information) without requiring individual emitter control, making it a relatively low-barrier route to useful metrology.
Deterministic photonic cluster states from quantum dots are now a demonstrated resource for measurement-based quantum computing; extending the same protocol to larger spin registers with nuclear-spin memories could reach graph states of 10+ photons.
Cavity- and waveguide-mediated coupling allows spatially distant emitters to interact strongly, so that chip-scale architectures can implement all-to-all connected multi-qubit operations rather than requiring nanometer-scale placement.
Moiré exciton lattices in 2D materials provide a solid-state implementation of Bose-Hubbard physics, with strong on-site interactions and long-range dipolar couplings; the review's synthesis suggests these can serve as programmable quantum simulators.
The combination of Stark tuning, phononic bandgap engineering, and dynamical decoupling is steadily closing the gap between measured coherence times and what fault-tolerant protocols demand, making the scaling path concrete for several platforms.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural test of the review's thesis is to push beyond two-emitter experiments: measuring genuine multipartite entanglement witnesses in a three-emitter cavity-QED setup would directly probe whether the collective-state picture holds at N>2, a step the review notes has not yet been achieved.
Because the review concedes that g(2) anti-dips can be mimicked by non-interacting emitters under realistic conditions, future demonstrations should pair photon-correlation measurements with direct spectral or coherent-control evidence; this suggests a reporting standard for the field rather than a physics limitation.
The Green's-function formalism implies that inverse-designed nanophotonics—rather than only standard cavity geometries—could be used to engineer specific many-body Hamiltonians on demand. This extrapolates the review's toolkit to a programmability level it does not discuss explicitly.
One interesting consequence the review leaves implicit: if superradiant states are to be used for metrology, the optimal measurement scheme likely needs optical nonlinearities or specially tailored detection; the review flags this as an open problem, so a practical breakthrough may depend on integrating the very photon nonlinearities it separately surveys.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Punchline: this is a review, not a research preprint. No new derivation, no new data, no new protocol—the only equation is the textbook Lehmberg master equation. What it does well is synthesize a sprawling field: molecules, QDs, color centers, 2D materials, moiré systems, and plasmonic platforms are brought into one coherent map, and the authors are unusually explicit about open problems. They name the gap between theoretical Heisenberg scaling and practical sensing with superradiant states, and they flag the Cygorek et al. warning that a g(2) anti-dip alone is not a reliable superradiance signature. That honesty is real and gives the review credibility.

Soft spots: the anti-dip caveat is not consistently applied. In the section on entanglement verification, the review says anti-dips 'have already been observed' in several systems, then immediately notes the Cygorek caveat. But later, the SiC microdisk result is described as 'confirming collective radiative decay' and the perovskite superlattice as showing 'a signature of superradiance' without any qualification. That is an internal tension, and the stress-test note is right to catch it. The survey's central claim—that solid-state emitters are on a credible path to scalable many-body entanglement—does not collapse, because the claim is about the research direction rather than a specific experimental proof. But the evidence base for that direction is thinner than the unqualified prose suggests. Minor editorial issues: typos like 'inhomogenieties', 'of of', 'and and', and a malformed DOI in the van Diepen reference. Nothing suggesting scientific misconduct.

Who it's for: readers entering the field or teaching a course on solid-state quantum photonics. A specialist won't find new results, but will appreciate the scope and the honest identification of bottlenecks. I would take it as a starting point, not a definitive statement.

Recommendation: send it to peer review. A review of this breadth deserves a serious referee, especially one with experimental superradiance experience. The referees should require the authors to reconcile the g(2) signature language and clean up the bibliography. With moderate revision, it would be a useful reference.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This review surveys the prospects for realizing many-body entangled states—superradiance, photonic graph/cluster states, and emergent quantum phases—using solid-state quantum emitters coupled to nanophotonic structures. It reviews single-emitter coherence and decoherence mechanisms, spectral tuning, collective few-emitter interactions, cavity and waveguide QED, large ensembles, moiré-exciton quantum phases, photon nonlinearities, deterministic cluster-state generation, and applications. The thesis is that emitter inhomogeneity and dephasing are the central obstacles, and that recent demonstrations place the field on a credible path to scalable many-body entanglement. The manuscript contains no new derivations; it is a literature review with an extensive reference list.

Significance. The review is timely and unusually broad, integrating results across molecules, quantum dots, color centers, and 2D materials. If the surveyed interpretations hold, it provides a useful roadmap and will serve as a reference for researchers entering the field. Strengths include its candid acknowledgment of the limits of photon-correlation signatures (citing Cygorek et al. [121]) and of the unresolved metrological value of superradiant states, as well as the inclusion of very recent 2024–2025 literature and clear schematic figures. The main weakness is an uneven level of confidence in the experimental evidence: some flagship superradiance demonstrations are described as confirmatory even though the review's own methodological caveat warns that such signatures are not unique to collective quantum behavior. This inconsistency weakens the evidentiary support for the central claim and should be repaired before publication.

major comments (2)

[Entanglement verification and coherent control; Cavity QED with multiple emitters] The paragraph on photon-correlation diagnostics states that an anti-dip violating the bound g(2)(0) ≤ (N−1)/N 'provides a direct confirmation of inter-emitter correlations' and then immediately cautions, citing Cygorek et al. [121], that an anti-dip alone is not always a reliable superradiance signature. However, in 'Cavity QED with multiple emitters' the SiC microdisk result [95] is described as 'superradiant bunching in photon correlation measurements, confirming collective radiative decay' (Fig. 3c), and Fig. 2g describes the perovskite superlattice [103] as showing 'photon bunching at zero delay as a signature of superradiance.' These later statements are unqualified. Please either apply the [121] caveat to these specific experiments or provide a concrete argument explaining why the multimode or many-emitter conditions in [95,103] exclude the non-interacting alternative. This is load
[Outlook/Future Perspectives] The abstract and introduction list quantum sensing among the target applications of many-body entangled states. The Outlook section, however, correctly states that 'the direct usefulness of the superradiant states to quantum sensing remains an open problem' and that optimal measurement schemes and the effects of loss/dephasing are not understood. This is an honest hedge, but it is not reflected in the forward-looking claims near the beginning. The authors should either temper the abstract/introduction or add a sentence in the introduction flagging that the metrological advantage is currently conjectural, so that the review is internally consistent.

minor comments (6)

[Outlook/Future Perspectives] Typo: 'the direct usefulness of of the superradiant states' should read 'the direct usefulness of the superradiant states'.
[Outlook/Future Perspectives] Typo: 'In TMDs and and their heterostructures' should read 'In TMDs and their heterostructures'.
[Author list] The author name 'Vladamir Shalaev' appears to be a misspelling of 'Vladimir Shalaev'.
[Entanglement verification and coherent control] The term 'anti-dip' is potentially confusing. In photon-correlation measurements, an anti-bunching dip is a suppression at zero delay, while superradiance is often discussed in terms of bunching (g(2)(0)>1). Please define the term and use consistent terminology with the later 'bunching' descriptions.
[Cavity QED with multiple emitters] The notation for silicon-vacancy centers is inconsistent: 'Vsi' appears in several places, whereas the standard notation used elsewhere in the text is 'VSi'.
[Figure 4] The caption refers to 'Figure 4i-h'; the intended reference appears to be panels (i) and (j). Please correct.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: this is a literature review with no fitted parameters, predictions, or uniqueness claims that reduce to their inputs.

full rationale

This paper is an expository review, not a derivation. It surveys demonstrated superradiance/subradiance, cavity-mediated interactions, photon nonlinearities, and graph-state generation in solid-state emitters, citing primary experimental and theoretical works from many independent groups. No parameter is fitted to data and later called a prediction; no quantity is defined in terms of itself; no uniqueness theorem is invoked to force a choice of model. The authors do cite their own prior work (e.g., [87] superradiant organic molecules, [181] molecular cavity QED, [225] Rydberg-exciton nonlinearities, [94] theory of quantum-enhanced interferometry), but these self-citations are used as part of the surveyed evidence base, alongside independent studies, and none of the review's organizational claims reduces to them. The one relevant internal tension is the anti-dip caveat: the review states, citing Cygorek et al. [121], that 'the observation of an anti-dip alone does not always constitute a reliable signature of superradiant behavior,' while elsewhere describing systems such as [95] as 'confirming collective radiative decay' and [103] as showing superradiance. This is a limitation on the strength of the experimental evidence, and the review partially hedges by noting that 'two-photon correlation measurements still signal non-classical light.' It is a correctness/evidence concern, not circular reasoning: the review does not define superradiance in terms of an anti-dip, nor does it derive any result from that signature. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no free parameters and no invented entities. Its organizational claims rest on standard quantum-optics frameworks (Markovian master equation, Dicke/Tavis-Cummings collective models, stabilizer-based verification) and on an interpretive assumption about experimental signatures that the review itself acknowledges as imperfect.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption The Markovian master equation with Green's-function-mediated coherent and dissipative couplings (Eq. 1, Box 2) adequately describes many-emitter light-matter dynamics.
The review's entire framework for emitter-emitter interactions (J_ij and Gamma_ij from the electromagnetic Green's function) is the standard Lehmberg master equation, valid in the Born-Markov regime; non-Markovian effects are not treated and are not discussed as a limitation.
domain assumption Dicke/Tavis-Cummings collective models apply to dense solid-state emitter ensembles, including predicted N^2 superradiant scaling.
The superradiance discussion (Section “Collective phenomena in large ensembles”) rests on Dicke's model and its 2D/waveguide extensions, which assume near-identical emitters; inhomogeneous broadening is acknowledged as the main obstacle, so this assumption is load-bearing for the review's optimism.
domain assumption Observed photon-correlation signatures, spectral splittings, and time-resolved decay changes are valid evidence of collective quantum states in the surveyed experiments.
The review itself flags (entanglement-verification section, ref [121]) that a g(2) anti-dip can arise from non-interacting emitters, making this interpretive link load-bearing for its survey of experimental demonstrations.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Many-Body Entanglement in Solid-State Emitters." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PP5A2SPD

@misc{pith2026251120797,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Many-Body Entanglement in Solid-State Emitters},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PP5A2SPD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.20797}
}

read the original abstract

The preparation and control of quantum states lie at the heart of quantum information science (QIS). Recent advances in solid-state quantum emitters (QEs) and nanophotonics have transformed the landscape of quantum photonic technologies, enabling scalable generation of quantum states of light and matter. A new frontier in solid-state quantum photonics is the engineering of many-body interactions between QEs and photons to achieve robust coherence and controllable many-body entanglement. These entangled states, including photonic graph and cluster states, superradiant emission, and emergent quantum phases, are promising for quantum computation, sensing, and simulation. However, intrinsic inhomogeneities and decoherence in solid-state platforms pose significant challenges to realize such complex entangled states. This review provides an overview of the fundamental many-body interactions and dynamics at the light-matter interfaces of solid-state QEs, and discusses recent advances in mitigating decoherence and harnessing robust many-body coherence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.20797 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Overview of achieving many-body entanglement with solid-state quantum emitters integrated in nanophotonics. Top: Representative platforms, including vacancies in wide-bandgap crystals, epitaxial quantum dots, molecules, hBN defects, 2D excitons, and Rydberg excitons, highlighting complementary strengths in coherence, scalability, and intrinsic nonlinearity. Quantum dot image reproduced with permission from Ref. [19… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Many-body entanglement and collective emission in solid state QE systems. (a) Spectra of the superradiant (|+⟩) and subradiant (|−⟩) single-excitation states of two sub-wavelength spaced organic molecules, showing an extinguishing of the subradiant linewidth as the molecules are tuned into resonance. (b) Fluorescence spectrum of the system in a), displaying an additional two-photon peak at sufficiently large excitat… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Collective interactions of multiple solid-state quantum emitters in nanophotonic environments observed across molecular, quantum-dot, and color-center platforms. (a) Schematic cavity transmission spectra and energy-level diagrams illustrating three regimes: (i) two emitters off resonance with each other but nearresonant with the cavity, decaying independently, (ii) emitters resonant with each other and with the ca… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Pathways to achieve strong photon nonlinearity through exciton polaritons. (a) Excitation and re-emission of an exciton polariton by a single photon. Interactions shift the mode off resonance, suppressing multi-photon transmission (polariton blockade), reproduced with …

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: State of the art generation of Graph States and applications of many-body entangled states. (a-h) Generation of cluster and graph states from QDs. (a) Negatively charged QD in the center of a connected pillar optical cavity, (b) single InGaAs QD with GaAs barriers, (c)…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

298 extracted references · 114 canonical work pages

[121]

Cygorek, M.et al.Signatures of cooperative emission in photon coincidence: Superradiance versus measurement-induced cooperativity.Phys. Rev. A107, 023718, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.107.023718 (2023)

doi:10.1103/physreva.107.023718 2023
[95]

M.et al.Two-emitter multimode cavity quantum electrodynamics in thin-film silicon carbide photonics.Phys

Lukin, D. M.et al.Two-emitter multimode cavity quantum electrodynamics in thin-film silicon carbide photonics.Phys. Rev. X13, 011005, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011005 (2023)

doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.011005 2023
[103]

Rainò, G.et al.Superfluorescence from lead halide perovskite quantum dot superlattices.Nature563, 671–675, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0683-0 (2018)

doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0683-0 2018
[1]

Kimble, H. J. The quantum internet.Nature453, 1023–1030, DOI: 10.1038/nature07127 (2008)

doi:10.1038/nature07127 2008
[2]

Scaling up solid-state quantum photonics.Science362, 646–647, DOI: 10.1126/science

Lodahl, P. Scaling up solid-state quantum photonics.Science362, 646–647, DOI: 10.1126/science. aav3076 (2018)

doi:10.1126/science 2018
[3]

Turunen, M.et al.Quantum photonics with layered 2d materials.Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 219–236, DOI: 10.1038/s42254-021-00408-0 (2022)

doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00408-0 2022
[4]

J.et al.Quantum-coherent nanoscience.Nat

Heinrich, A. J.et al.Quantum-coherent nanoscience.Nat. Nanotechnol.16, 1318–1329, DOI: 10.1038/ s41565-021-00994-1 (2021)

2021
[5]

E.et al.Photon-mediated interactions between quantum emitters in a diamond nanocavity

Evans, R. E.et al.Photon-mediated interactions between quantum emitters in a diamond nanocavity. Science362, 662–665, DOI: 10.1126/science.aau4691 (2018)

doi:10.1126/science.aau4691 2018

Show all 298 references

[6]

Dousse, A.et al.Ultrabright source of entangled photon pairs.Nature466, 217–220, DOI: 10.1038/ nature09148 (2010)

2010
[7]

& Gershoni, D

Cogan, D., Su, Z.-E., Kenneth, O. & Gershoni, D. Deterministic generation of indistinguishable photons in a cluster state.Nat. Photon.17, 324–329, DOI: 10.1038/s41566-022-01152-2 (2023)

2023 doi
[8]

Coste, N.et al.High-rate entanglement between a semiconductor spin and indistinguishable photons. Nat. Photon.17, 582–587, DOI: 10.1038/s41566-023-01186-0 (2023)

2023 doi
[9]

Q.et al.Scalable in operando strain tuning in nanophotonic waveguides enabling three- quantum-dot superradiance.Nat

Grim, J. Q.et al.Scalable in operando strain tuning in nanophotonic waveguides enabling three- quantum-dot superradiance.Nat. Mater.18, 963–969, DOI: 10.1038/s41563-019-0418-0 (2019)

2019 doi
[10]

N., Lee, S.-Y

Atatüre, M., Englund, D., Vamivakas, A. N., Lee, S.-Y. & Wrachtrup, J. Material platforms for spin- based photonic quantum technologies.Nat. Rev. Mater.3, 38–51, DOI: 10.1038/s41578-018-0008-9 (2018)

2018 doi
[11]

& White, A

Senellart, P., Solomon, G. & White, A. High-performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources.Nat. Nanotechnol.12, 1026–1039, DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2017.218 (2017)

2017 doi
[12]

D., Hanson, R., Wrachtrup, J

Awschalom, D. D., Hanson, R., Wrachtrup, J. & Zhou, B. B. Quantum technologies with optically interfaced solid-state spins.Nat. Photon.12, 516–527, DOI: 10.1038/s41566-018-0232-2 (2018)

2018 doi
[13]

L., Furusawa, A

O’Brien, J. L., Furusawa, A. & Vučković, J. Photonic quantum technologies.Nat. Photon.3, 687–695, DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2009.229 (2009)

2009 doi
[14]

Nanotechnol.10, 497–502, DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2015.75 (2015)

He, Y.-M.et al.Single quantum emitters in monolayer semiconductors.Nat. Nanotechnol.10, 497–502, DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2015.75 (2015). 22

2015 doi
[15]

Nanotechnol.16, 399–403, DOI: 10.1038/s41565-020-00831-x (2021)

Tomm, N.et al.A bright and fast source of coherent single photons.Nat. Nanotechnol.16, 399–403, DOI: 10.1038/s41565-020-00831-x (2021)

2021 doi
[16]

Mater.20, 1615–1628, DOI: 10.1038/s41563-021-00987-4 (2021)

Toninelli, C.et al.Single organic molecules for photonic quantum technologies.Nat. Mater.20, 1615–1628, DOI: 10.1038/s41563-021-00987-4 (2021)

2021 doi
[17]

& Toth, M

Aharonovich, I., Tetienne, J.-P. & Toth, M. Quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride.Nano Lett. 22, 9227–9235, DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c03743 (2022)

2022 doi
[18]

Commun.11, 4745, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18594-1 (2020)

Zhai, L.et al.Low-noise gaas quantum dots for quantum photonics.Nat. Commun.11, 4745, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18594-1 (2020)

2020 doi
[19]

& Sanguinetti, S

Gurioli, M., Wang, Z., Rastelli, A., Kuroda, T. & Sanguinetti, S. Droplet epitaxy of semicon- ductor nanostructures for quantum photonic devices.Nat. Mater.18, 799–810, DOI: 10.1038/ s41563-019-0355-y (2019). Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

2019
[20]

& Lodahl, P

Uppu, R., Midolo, L., Zhou, X., Carolan, J. & Lodahl, P. Quantum-dot-based deterministic pho- ton–emitter interfaces for scalable photonic quantum technology.Nat. Nanotechnol.16, 1308–1317, DOI: 10.1038/s41565-021-00965-6 (2021)

2021 doi
[21]

Gao, X.et al.Single nuclear spin detection and control in a van der Waals material.Nature643, 943–949, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-09258-7 (2025)

2025 doi
[22]

Mater.22, 1311–1316, DOI: 10.1038/s41563-023-01645-7 (2023)

Li, X.et al.Proximity-induced chiral quantum light generation in strain-engineered WSe2/NiPS3 heterostructures.Nat. Mater.22, 1311–1316, DOI: 10.1038/s41563-023-01645-7 (2023). Number: 11 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

2023 doi
[23]

O., Peana, S., Sychev, D., Xu, X., Lagutchev, A

Senichev, A., Martin, Z. O., Peana, S., Sychev, D., Xu, X., Lagutchev, A. S., Boltasseva, A., Shalaev, V. M. Room-temperature single-photon emitters in silicon nitride.Sci. Adv.7, eabj0627, DOI: 10. 1126/sciadv.abj0627 2021)

2021
[24]

González-Tudela, A., Reiserer, A., García-Ripoll, J. J. & García-Vidal, F. J. Light–matter interactions in quantum nanophotonic devices.Nat. Rev. Phys.6, 166–179, DOI: 10.1038/s42254-023-00681-1 (2024)

2024 doi
[25]

Photon.12, 659–670, DOI: 10.1038/ s41566-018-0246-9 (2018)

Molesky, S.et al.Inverse design in nanophotonics.Nat. Photon.12, 659–670, DOI: 10.1038/ s41566-018-0246-9 (2018)

2018
[26]

& Reitzenstein, S

Rodt, S. & Reitzenstein, S. Integrated nanophotonics for the development of fully functional quantum circuitsbasedonon-demandsingle-photonemitters.APL Photonics6, DOI:10.1063/5.0031628(2021)

2021 doi
[27]

M., Guidry, M

Lukin, D. M., Guidry, M. A. & Vučković, J. Integrated quantum photonics with silicon carbide: Challenges and prospects.PRX Quantum1, 020102, DOI: 10.1103/PRXQuantum.1.020102 (2020)

2020 doi
[28]

& Thompson, M

Wang, J., Sciarrino, F., Laing, A. & Thompson, M. G. Integrated photonic quantum technologies.Nat. Photon.14, 273–284, DOI: 10.1038/s41566-019-0532-1 (2020). Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

2020 doi
[29]

Pelucchi, E.et al.The potential and global outlook of integrated photonics for quantum technologies. Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 194–208, DOI: 10.1038/s42254-021-00398-z (2022). Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

2022 doi
[30]

O., Wang, Y., Matthiessen, O

Senichev, A., Martin, Z. O., Wang, Y., Matthiessen, O. M., Lagutchev, A., Htoon, H., Boltasseva, A., Shalaev, V. M. Quantum emitters in aluminum nitride induced by heavy ion irradiation.APL Quantum1, 036103, DOI: 10.1063/5.0199647 2024)

2024 doi
[31]

& Toth, M

Aharonovich, I., Englund, D. & Toth, M. Solid-state single-photon emitters.Nat. Photon.10, 631–641, DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2016.186 (2016)

2016 doi
[32]

Fox, A. M. Solid-state quantum emitters.Advanced Quantum Technologies8, 2300390, DOI: 10.1002/ qute.202300390 (2025). 23

2025
[33]

Low-dimensional solid-state single-photon emitters.Nanophotonics14, 1687–1713, DOI: 10.1515/nanoph-2024-0569 2025

Chen, J., Cui, C., Lawrie, B., Xue, Y., Guha, S., Eichenfield, M., Zhao, H., Yan, X. Low-dimensional solid-state single-photon emitters.Nanophotonics14, 1687–1713, DOI: 10.1515/nanoph-2024-0569 2025

2024 doi
[34]

A.et al.Shallow silicon vacancy centers with lifetime-limited optical linewidths in diamond nanostructures.Nano Lett.23, 10901–10907, DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c03145 (2023)

Zuber, J. A.et al.Shallow silicon vacancy centers with lifetime-limited optical linewidths in diamond nanostructures.Nano Lett.23, 10901–10907, DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c03145 (2023)

2023 doi
[35]

Sipahigil, A.et al.Indistinguishable photons from separated silicon-vacancy centers in diamond.Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 113602, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.113602 (2014)

2014 doi
[36]

T.et al.Near transform-limited quantum dot linewidths in a broadband photonic crystal waveguide.ACS Photonics7, 2343–2349, DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c00758 (2020)

Pedersen, F. T.et al.Near transform-limited quantum dot linewidths in a broadband photonic crystal waveguide.ACS Photonics7, 2343–2349, DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c00758 (2020)

2020 doi
[37]

Thyrrestrup, H.et al.Quantumopticswithnear-lifetime-limitedquantum-dottransitionsinananopho- tonic waveguide.Nano Lett.18, 1801–1806, DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b05016 (2018)

2018 doi
[38]

Santori, C., Fattal, D., Vučković, J., Solomon, G. S. & Yamamoto, Y. Indistinguishable photons from a single-photon device.nature419, 594–597, DOI: 10.1038/nature01086 (2002)

2002 doi
[39]

Lombardi, P.et al.Triggered emission of indistinguishable photons from an organic dye molecule. Appl. Phys. Lett.118, DOI: doi.org/10.1063/5.0048567 (2021)

2021 doi
[40]

V.et al.Transform-limited single photons from a single quantum dot.Nat

Kuhlmann, A. V.et al.Transform-limited single photons from a single quantum dot.Nat. Commun. 6, 8204, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9204 (2015)

2015 doi
[41]

V.et al.Charge noise and spin noise in a semiconductor quantum device.Nat

Kuhlmann, A. V.et al.Charge noise and spin noise in a semiconductor quantum device.Nat. Phys. 9, 570–575, DOI: 10.1038/nphys2688 (2013)

2013 doi
[42]

Çakan, A.et al.Quantum optics applications of hexagonal boron nitride defects.Adv. Opt. Mater. 13, 2402508, DOI: 10.1002/adom.202402508 (2025)

2025 doi
[43]

& Aharonovich, I

Toth, M. & Aharonovich, I. Single photon sources in atomically thin materials.Annual Review of Physical Chemistry70, 123–142, DOI: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-042018-052628 (2019)

2019 doi
[44]

& Heindel, T

Gao, T., von Helversen, M., Antón-Solanas, C., Schneider, C. & Heindel, T. Atomically-thin single-photon sources for quantum communication.npj 2D Mater. Appl.7, 4, DOI: 10.1038/ s41699-023-00366-4 (2023)

2023
[45]

G.et al.Nanophotonics with multilayer van der Waals materials.Nat

Zotev, P. G.et al.Nanophotonics with multilayer van der Waals materials.Nat. Photon.1–15, DOI: 10.1038/s41566-025-01717-x (2025)

2025 doi
[46]

Esmann, M., Wein, S. C. & Antón-Solanas, C. Solid-state single-photon sources: Recent advances for novel quantum materials.Adv. Funct. Mater.34, 2315936, DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202315936 (2024)

2024 doi
[47]

A., Sato, S.-i

Castelletto, S., Inam, F. A., Sato, S.-i. & Boretti, A. Hexagonal boron nitride: a review of the emerging material platform for single-photon sources and the spin–photon interface.Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 11, 740–769, DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.11.61 (2020)

2020 doi
[48]

Shaik, A. B. & Palla, P. Optical quantum technologies with hexagonal boron nitride single photon sources.Scientific reports11, 12285, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90804-4 (2021)

2021 doi
[49]

Dietrich, A.et al.Observation of fourier transform limited lines in hexagonal boron nitride.Phys. Rev. B98, 081414, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.081414 (2018)

2018 doi
[50]

& Aharonovich, I

Kianinia, M., Xu, Z.-Q., Toth, M. & Aharonovich, I. Quantum emitters in 2d materials: Emitter engineering, photophysics, and integration in photonic nanostructures.Appl. Phys. Rev.9, DOI: 10.1063/5.0072091 (2022)

2022 doi
[51]

Fournier, C.et al.Two-photon interference from a quantum emitter in hexagonal boron nitride.Phys. Rev. Appl.19, L041003, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.L041003 (2023). 24

2023 doi
[52]

Akbari, H.et al.Lifetime-limited and tunable quantum light emission in h-BN via electric field modulation.Nano Lett.22, 7798–7803, DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02163 (2022)

2022 doi
[53]

Ding, X.et al.On-demand single photons with high extraction efficiency and near-unity indistin- guishability from a resonantly driven quantum dot in a micropillar.Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 020401, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.020401 (2016)

2016 doi
[54]

Photon.10, 340–345, DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2016.23 (2016)

Somaschi, N.et al.Near-optimal single-photon sources in the solid state.Nat. Photon.10, 340–345, DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2016.23 (2016)

2016 doi
[55]

M., Jarmola, A., Budker, D

Bar-Gill, N., Pham, L. M., Jarmola, A., Budker, D. & Walsworth, R. L. Solid-state electronic spin coherence time approaching one second.Nat. Commun.4, 1743, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2771 (2013)

2013 doi
[56]

Hepp, C.et al.Electronic structure of the silicon vacancy color center in diamond.Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 036405, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.036405 (2014)

2014 doi
[57]

Commun.8, 15579, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15579 (2017)

Pingault, B.et al.Coherent control of the silicon-vacancy spin in diamond.Nat. Commun.8, 15579, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15579 (2017)

2017 doi
[58]

J.et al.All-optical initialization, readout, and coherent preparation of single silicon-vacancy spins in diamond.Phys

Rogers, L. J.et al.All-optical initialization, readout, and coherent preparation of single silicon-vacancy spins in diamond.Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 263602, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.263602 (2014)

2014 doi
[59]

Vaidya, S., Gao, X., Dikshit, S., Aharonovich, I. & Li, T. Quantum sensing and imaging with spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride.Advances in Physics: X8, 2206049, DOI: 10.1080/23746149.2023. 2206049(2023). Publisher: Taylor&Francis_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/23746149.2...

2023
[60]

Commun.14, 3299, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-39115-y (2023)

Gong, R.et al.Coherent dynamics of strongly interacting electronic spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride.Nat. Commun.14, 3299, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-39115-y (2023). Publisher: Nature Pub- lishing Group

2023 doi
[61]

B., Sychev, D., Gao, X., Peana, S., Baburin, A

Xu, X., Solanki, A. B., Sychev, D., Gao, X., Peana, S., Baburin, A. S., Pagadala, K., Martin, Z. O., Chowdhury, S. N., Chen, Y. P., Taniguchi, T., Watanabe, K., Rodionov, I. A., Kildishev, A. V., Li, T., Upadhyaya, P., Boltasseva, A., Shalaev, V. M. Greatly enhanced emission f...

2023 doi
[62]

Commun.13, 4347, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31743-0 (2022)

Haykal, A.et al.Decoherence ofV − B spin defects in monoisotopic hexagonal boron nitride.Nat. Commun.13, 4347, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31743-0 (2022)

2022 doi
[63]

Commun.14, 5089, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-40473-w (2023)

Rizzato, R.et al.Extending the coherence of spin defects in hbn enables advanced qubit control and quantum sensing.Nat. Commun.14, 5089, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-40473-w (2023)

2023 doi
[64]

Cywiński, Ł., Witzel, W. M. & Das Sarma, S. Pure quantum dephasing of a solid-state electron spin qubit in a large nuclear spin bath coupled by long-range hyperfine-mediated interactions.Phys. Rev. B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics79, 245314, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.24...

2009 doi
[65]

& Chekhovich, E

Gillard, G., Clarke, E. & Chekhovich, E. A. Harnessing many-body spin environment for long coherence storage and high-fidelity single-shot qubit readout.Nat. Commun.13, 4048, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31618-4 (2022)

2022 doi
[66]

N.et al.Enhanced electron-spin coherence in a gaas quantum emitter.Phys

Nguyen, G. N.et al.Enhanced electron-spin coherence in a gaas quantum emitter.Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 210805, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.210805 (2023)

2023 doi
[67]

& Gregersen, N

Vannucci, L. & Gregersen, N. Highly efficient and indistinguishable single-photon sources via phonon- decoupledtwo-colorexcitation.Phys. Rev. B107, 195306, DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.195306(2023)

2023 doi
[68]

Phys.21, 77–82, DOI: 10.1038/s41567-024-02697-5 (2025)

Kuruma, K.et al.Controlling interactions between high-frequency phonons and single quantum sys- tems using phononic crystals.Nat. Phys.21, 77–82, DOI: 10.1038/s41567-024-02697-5 (2025). 25

2025 doi
[69]

S.et al.Nano-acoustic resonator with ultralong phonon lifetime.Science370, 840–843, DOI: 10.1126/science.abc7312 (2020)

MacCabe, G. S.et al.Nano-acoustic resonator with ultralong phonon lifetime.Science370, 840–843, DOI: 10.1126/science.abc7312 (2020). https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.abc7312

2020 doi
[70]

Meesala, S.et al.Strain engineering of the silicon-vacancy center in diamond.Phys. Rev. B97, 205444, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.205444 (2018)

2018 doi
[71]

J.et al.Coherence protection of spin qubits in hexagonal boron nitride.Nat

Ramsay, A. J.et al.Coherence protection of spin qubits in hexagonal boron nitride.Nat. Commun. 14, 461, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-36196-7 (2023)

2023 doi
[72]

Sohn, Y.-I.et al.Controlling the coherence of a diamond spin qubit through its strain environment. Nat. Commun.9, 2012, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04340-3 (2018)

2012 doi
[73]

I.et al.Single-shot readout and weak measurement of a tin-vacancy qubit in diamond

Rosenthal, E. I.et al.Single-shot readout and weak measurement of a tin-vacancy qubit in diamond. Phys. Rev. X14, 041008, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.14.041008 (2024)

2024 doi
[74]

J.et al.Quantum-confined stark shifts of charged exciton complexes in quantum dots.Phys

Finley, J. J.et al.Quantum-confined stark shifts of charged exciton complexes in quantum dots.Phys. Rev. B70, 201308, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.201308 (2004)

2004 doi
[75]

D.et al.Manipulating exciton fine structure in quantum dots with a lateral electric field.Appl

Gerardot, B. D.et al.Manipulating exciton fine structure in quantum dots with a lateral electric field.Appl. Phys. Lett.90, 041101, DOI: 10.1063/1.2431758 (2007). https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/ article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.2431758/14367861/041101_1_online.pdf

2007 doi
[76]

https://pubs.aip.org/aip/ adv/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.5110865/12907337/085112_1_online.pdf

Höfer, B.et al.Tuning emission energy and fine structure splitting in quantum dots emitting in the telecom o-band.AIP Advances9, 085112, DOI: 10.1063/1.5110865 (2019). https://pubs.aip.org/aip/ adv/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.5110865/12907337/085112_1_online.pdf

2019 doi
[77]

& Bester, G

Luo, J.-W., Singh, R., Zunger, A. & Bester, G. Influence of the atomic-scale structure on the exciton fine-structure splitting in ingaas and gaas quantum dots in a vertical electric field.Phys. Rev. B86, 161302, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.161302 (2012)

2012 doi
[78]

Colautti, M.et al.Laser-induced frequency tuning of fourier-limited single-molecule emitters.ACS Nano14, 13584–13592, DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c05620 (2020)

2020 doi
[79]

ACS Nano18, 32508–32516, DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.4c08382 (2024)

Duquennoy, R.et al.Enhanced control of single-molecule emission frequency and spectral diffusion. ACS Nano18, 32508–32516, DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.4c08382 (2024). PMID: 39537346, https://doi. org/10.1021/acsnano.4c08382

2024 doi
[80]

D., Pan, A., Nichol, J

Burkard, G., Ladd, T. D., Pan, A., Nichol, J. M. & Petta, J. R. Semiconductor spin qubits.Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 025003, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.95.025003 (2023)

2023 doi
[81]

& Gali, A

Zhang, G., Cheng, Y., Chou, J.-P. & Gali, A. Material platforms for defect qubits and single-photon emitters.Appl. Phys. Rev.7, DOI: 10.1063/5.0006075 (2020)

2020 doi
[82]

I., Parto, K

Azzam, S. I., Parto, K. & Moody, G. Prospects and challenges of quantum emitters in 2d materials. Appl. Phys. Lett.118, DOI: 10.1063/5.0054116 (2021)

2021 doi
[83]

& Yakobson, B

Gupta, S., Wu, W., Huang, S. & Yakobson, B. I. Single-photon emission from two-dimensional ma- terials, to a brighter future.J. Phys. Chem. Lett.14, 3274–3284, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c03674 (2023)

2023 doi
[84]

Wang, G.et al.Colloquium: Excitons in atomically thin transition metal dichalcogenides.Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 021001, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.021001 (2018)

2018 doi
[85]

& Guo, G.-C

Zheng, S.-B. & Guo, G.-C. Efficient scheme for two-atom entanglement and quantum information processing in cavity qed.Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 2392–2395, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2392 (2000)

2000 doi
[86]

Majer, J.et al.Coupling superconducting qubits via a cavity bus.Nature449, 443–447, DOI: 10.1038/nature06184 (2007). 26

2007 doi
[87]

M., Daggett, E., Walther, V., Huang, L

Lange, C. M., Daggett, E., Walther, V., Huang, L. & Hood, J. D. Superradiant and subradiant states in lifetime-limited organic molecules through laser-induced tuning.Nat. Phys.1–7, DOI: 10.1038/ s41567-024-02404-4 (2024)

2024
[88]

W.et al.Coherent interactions between silicon-vacancy centers in diamond.Phys

Day, M. W.et al.Coherent interactions between silicon-vacancy centers in diamond.Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 203603, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.203603 (2022)

2022 doi
[89]

Science379, 389–393, DOI: 10.1126/science.ade9324 (2023)

Tiranov, A.et al.Collective super-and subradiant dynamics between distant optical quantum emitters. Science379, 389–393, DOI: 10.1126/science.ade9324 (2023)

2023 doi
[90]

& Lounis, B

Trebbia, J.-B., Deplano, Q., Tamarat, P. & Lounis, B. Tailoring the superradiant and subradi- ant nature of two coherently coupled quantum emitters.Nat. Commun.13, 2962, DOI: 10.1038/ s41467-022-30672-2 (2022)

2022
[91]

E., Kimble, H

González-Tudela, A., Paulisch, V., Chang, D. E., Kimble, H. J. & Cirac, J. I. Deterministic generation of arbitrary photonic states assisted by dissipation.Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 163603, DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.115.163603 (2015)

2015
[92]

González-Tudela, A., Paulisch, V., Kimble, H. J. & Cirac, J. I. Efficient multiphoton generation in waveguide quantum electrodynamics.Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 213601, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118. 213601 (2017)

2017 doi
[93]

J., Yelin, S

Rubies-Bigorda, O., Masson, S. J., Yelin, S. F. & Asenjo-Garcia, A. Deterministic generation of photonic entangled states using decoherence-free subspaces.Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 213603, DOI: 10. 1103/PhysRevLett.134.213603 (2025)

2025
[94]

& Trivedi, R

Abbasgholinejad, E., Malz, D., Asenjo-Garcia, A. & Trivedi, R. Theory of quantum-enhanced interfer- ometry with general markovian light sources.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.05111DOI: 10.48550/arXiv. 2504.05111 (2025)

2025 doi arXiv
[96]

M.et al.Mesoscopic cavity quantum electrodynamics with phase-disordered emitters in a Kerr nonlinear resonator, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.09324 (2025)

Lukin, D. M.et al.Mesoscopic cavity quantum electrodynamics with phase-disordered emitters in a Kerr nonlinear resonator, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.09324 (2025). ArXiv:2504.09324 [quant-ph]

2025 doi arXiv
[97]

Radiation from ann-atom system

Lehmberg, R. Radiation from ann-atom system. i. general formalism.Phys. Rev. A2, 883, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.2.883 (1970)

1970 doi
[98]

Lewenstein, M.et al.Ultracold atomic gases in optical lattices: mimicking condensed matter physics and beyond.Advances in Physics56, 243–379, DOI: 10.1080/00018730701223200 (2007)

2007 doi
[99]

Dutta, O.et al.Non-standard Hubbard models in optical lattices: a review.Reports on Progress in Physics78, 066001, DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/78/6/066001 (2015)

2015 doi
[100]

& Lahaye, T

Browaeys, A. & Lahaye, T. Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms.Nat. Phys.16, 132–142, DOI: 10.1038/s41567-019-0733-z (2020)

2020 doi
[101]

& Haroche, S

Gross, M. & Haroche, S. Superradiance: An essay on the theory of collective spontaneous emission. Phys. Rep.93, 301–396, DOI: 10.1016/0370-1573(82)90102-8 (1982)

1982 doi
[102]

Masson, S. J. & Asenjo-Garcia, A. Universality of dicke superradiance in arrays of quantum emitters. Nat. Commun.13, 2285, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29805-4 (2022)

2022 doi
[104]

Mater.24, 527–534, DOI: 10.1038/s41563-025-02135-8 (2025)

Deng, S.et al.Frozen non-equilibrium dynamics of exciton mott insulators in moiré superlattices.Nat. Mater.24, 527–534, DOI: 10.1038/s41563-025-02135-8 (2025). 27

2025 doi
[105]

Description of states in quantum mechanics by density matrix and operator techniques.Rev

Fano, U. Description of states in quantum mechanics by density matrix and operator techniques.Rev. Mod. Phys.29, 74, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.29.74 (1957)

1957 doi
[106]

Wootters, W. K. & Fields, B. D. Optimal state-determination by mutually unbiased measurements. Ann. Phys.191, 363–381, DOI: 10.1016/0003-4916(89)90322-9 (1989)

1989 doi
[107]

Elben, A.et al.The randomized measurement toolbox.Nat. Rev. Phys.5, 9–24, DOI: 10.1038/ s42254-022-00535-2 (2023)

2023
[108]

Elben, A.et al.Mixed-state entanglement from local randomized measurements.Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 200501, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.200501 (2020)

2020 doi
[109]

Vermersch, B.et al.Many-body entropies and entanglement from polynomially many local measure- ments.Phys. Rev. X14, 031035, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.14.031035 (2024)

2024 doi
[110]

& Preskill, J

Huang, H.-Y., Kueng, R. & Preskill, J. Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements.Nat. Phys.16, 1050–1057, DOI: 10.1038/s41567-020-0932-7 (2020)

2020 doi
[111]

Chuang, I. L. & Nielsen, M. A. Prescription for experimental determination of the dynamics of a quantum black box.J. Mod. Opt.44, 2455–2467, DOI: 10.1080/09500349708231894 (1997)

1997 doi
[112]

Mohseni, M., Rezakhani, A. T. & Lidar, D. A. Quantum-process tomography: Resource analysis of different strategies.Phys. Rev. A77, 032322, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.032322 (2008)

2008 doi
[113]

Haah, J., Hunter-Jones, N., Liu, Y., Tran, M. C. & Xu, S. Learning quantum hamiltoni- ans from high-temperature gibbs states and real-time evolutions.Nat. Phys.20, 370–376, DOI: 10.1038/s41567-023-02376-x (2023)

2023 doi
[114]

& Eisert, J

Stick-Franca, D., Roth, I. & Eisert, J. Efficient and robust estimation of many-qubit hamiltonians. Nat. Commun.15, 963, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-44012-5 (2023)

2023 doi
[115]

& França Santos, M

Auffèves, A., Gerace, D., Portolan, S., Drezet, A. & França Santos, M. Few emitters in a cavity: from cooperative emission to individualization.New J. Phys.13, 093020, DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/13/9/ 093020 (2011)

2011 doi
[116]

& Agarwal, G

Bhatti, D., Von Zanthier, J. & Agarwal, G. S. Superbunching and Nonclassicality as new Hallmarks of Superradiance.Scientific Reports5, 17335, DOI: 10.1038/srep17335 (2015)

2015 doi
[117]

X.et al.Coherence in cooperative photon emission from indistinguishable quantum emitters

Koong, Z. X.et al.Coherence in cooperative photon emission from indistinguishable quantum emitters. Science Advances8, eabm8171, DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abm8171 (2022)

2022 doi
[118]

Machielse, B.et al.Quantum Interference of Electromechanically Stabilized Emitters in Nanophotonic Devices.Phys. Rev. X9, 031022, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031022 (2019)

2019 doi
[120]

Science354, 847–850, DOI: 10.1126/science.aah6875 (2016)

Sipahigil, A.et al.An integrated diamond nanophotonics platform for quantum-optical networks. Science354, 847–850, DOI: 10.1126/science.aah6875 (2016)

2016 doi
[122]

B.et al.Interference of single photons from two separate semiconductor quantum dots.Phys

Flagg, E. B.et al.Interference of single photons from two separate semiconductor quantum dots.Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 137401, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.137401 (2010)

2010 doi
[123]

B.et al.Two-photon interference of the emission from electrically tunable remote quantum dots.Nat

Patel, R. B.et al.Two-photon interference of the emission from electrically tunable remote quantum dots.Nat. Photon.4, 632–635, DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2010.161 (2010). 28

2010 doi
[124]

A.et al.Collectively enhanced ramsey readout by cavity sub- to superradiant transition

Bohr, E. A.et al.Collectively enhanced ramsey readout by cavity sub- to superradiant transition. Nat. Commun.15, 1084, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45420-x (2024)

2024 doi
[125]

& Ritsch, H

Hotter, C., Ostermann, L. & Ritsch, H. Cavity sub- and superradiance for transversely driven atomic ensembles.Phys. Rev. Res.5, 013056, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.013056 (2023)

2023 doi
[126]

Dicke, R. H. Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes.Phys. Rev.93, 99–110, DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRev.93.99 (1954)

1954
[127]

J., Covey, J

Masson, S. J., Covey, J. P., Will, S. & Asenjo-Garcia, A. Dicke superradiance in ordered arrays of multilevel atoms.PRX Quantum5, 010344, DOI: 10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.010344 (2024)

2024 doi
[128]

Sierra, E., Masson, S. J. & Asenjo-Garcia, A. Dicke superradiance in ordered lattices: Dimensionality matters.Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023207, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.023207 (2022)

2022 doi
[129]

J., Zager, Z

Cardenas-Lopez, S., Masson, S. J., Zager, Z. & Asenjo-Garcia, A. Many-body superradiance and dynamical mirror symmetry breaking in waveguide qed.Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 033605, DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.131.033605 (2023)

2023
[130]

J., Ferrier-Barbut, I., Orozco, L

Masson, S. J., Ferrier-Barbut, I., Orozco, L. A., Browaeys, A. & Asenjo-Garcia, A. Many-body signa- tures of collective decay in atomic chains.Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 263601, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 125.263601 (2020)

2020 doi
[131]

Theoretical study of early-time superradiance for atom clouds and arrays.Phys

Robicheaux, F. Theoretical study of early-time superradiance for atom clouds and arrays.Phys. Rev. A104, 063706, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.104.063706 (2021)

2021 doi
[132]

D.et al.Superradiance and exciton delocalization in perovskite quantum dot superlattices

Blach, D. D.et al.Superradiance and exciton delocalization in perovskite quantum dot superlattices. Nano Lett.22, 7811–7818, DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02427 (2022)

2022 doi
[133]

PMID: 40169400, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c00478

Luo, L.et al.Polarized superradiance from cspbbr3 quantum dot superlattice with controlled interdot electronic coupling.Nano Lett.25, 6176–6183, DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c00478 (2025). PMID: 40169400, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c00478

2025 doi
[134]

Rainò, G., Utzat, H., Bawendi, M. G. & Kovalenko, M. V. Superradiant emission from self-assembled light emitters: From molecules to quantum dots.MRS Bulletin45, 841–848, DOI: 10.1557/mrs.2020. 250 (2020)

2020 doi
[135]

Superradiance of Strongly Interacting Dipolar Excitons in Moiré Quantum Materials.Phys

Kumlin, J. Superradiance of Strongly Interacting Dipolar Excitons in Moiré Quantum Materials.Phys. Rev. Lett.134, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.126901 (2025)

2025 doi
[136]

& Cirac, J

Paulisch, V., Perarnau-Llobet, M., González-Tudela, A. & Cirac, J. I. Quantum metrology with one-dimensional superradiant photonic states.Phys. Rev. A99, 043807, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.99. 043807 (2019)

2019 doi
[137]

Published: 26 April 2023

Lei, M.et al.Many-body cavity quantum electrodynamics with driven inhomogeneous emitters.Nature 617, 271–276, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-05884-1 (2023). Published: 26 April 2023

2023 doi
[138]

Li, X., Marino, J., Chang, D. E. & Flebus, B. Solid-state platform for cooperative quantum dynamics driven by correlated emission.Phys. Rev. B111, 064424, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.111.064424 (2025)

2025 doi
[139]

selective radiance

Asenjo-Garcia, A., Moreno-Cardoner, M., Albrecht, A., Kimble, H. J. & Chang, D. E. Exponential improvement in photon storage fidelities using subradiance and “selective radiance” in atomic arrays. Phys. Rev. X7, 031024, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.031024 (2017)

2017 doi
[140]

V., André, A., Fleischhauer, M., Sørensen, A

Gorshkov, A. V., André, A., Fleischhauer, M., Sørensen, A. S. & Lukin, M. D. Universal approach to optimal photon storage in atomic media.Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 123601, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98. 123601 (2007)

2007 doi
[141]

D., Trivedi, R., Safavi-Naeini, A

Mishra, S. D., Trivedi, R., Safavi-Naeini, A. H. & Vučković, J. Control design for inhomogeneous- broadening compensation in single-photon transducers.Phys. Rev. Appl.16, 044025, DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevApplied.16.044025 (2021). 29

2021
[142]

& Rasetti, M

Zanardi, P. & Rasetti, M. Error avoiding quantum codes.Modern Physics Letters B11, 1085–1093, DOI: 10.1142/S0217984997001304 (1997)

1997 doi
[143]

A., Chuang, I

Lidar, D. A., Chuang, I. L. & Whaley, K. B. Decoherence-free subspaces for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 2594–2597, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2594 (1998)

1998 doi
[144]

& Knight, P

Beige, A., Braun, D., Tregenna, B. & Knight, P. L. Quantum computing using dissipation to remain in a decoherence-free subspace.Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 1762–1765, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1762 (2000)

2000 doi
[145]

& Knight, P

Beige, A., Braun, D. & Knight, P. L. Driving atoms into decoherence-free states.New J. Phys.2, 22, DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/2/1/322 (2000)

2000 doi
[146]

M.et al.Moiré heterostructures as a condensed-matter quantum simulator.Nat

Kennes, D. M.et al.Moiré heterostructures as a condensed-matter quantum simulator.Nat. Phys. 17, 155–163, DOI: 10.1038/s41567-020-01154-3 (2021)

2021 doi
[147]

& Angelakis, D

Noh, C. & Angelakis, D. G. Quantum simulations and many-body physics with light.Reports on Progress in Physics80, 016401, DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/80/1/016401 (2016). Publisher: IOP Pub- lishing

2016 doi
[148]

Mak, K. F. & Shan, J. Semiconductor moiré materials.Nat. Nanotechnol.17, 686–695, DOI: 10.1038/ s41565-022-01165-6 (2022)

2022
[149]

Moiré-bose-hubbardmodelforinterlayerexcitonsintwistedtransition metal dichalcogenide heterostructures.Phys

Götting, N., Lohof, F.&Gies, C. Moiré-bose-hubbardmodelforinterlayerexcitonsintwistedtransition metal dichalcogenide heterostructures.Phys. Rev. B105, 165419, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.165419 (2022)

2022 doi
[150]

https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv

Baek, H.et al.Highly energy-tunable quantum light from moiré-trapped excitons.Science Advances 6, eaba8526, DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aba8526 (2020). https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv. aba8526

2020 doi
[151]

Jin, C.et al.Observation of moiré excitons in wse2/ws2 heterostructure superlattices.Nature567, 76–80, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-0976-y (2019)

2019 doi
[152]

Phys.20, 1448–1453, DOI: 10.1038/s41567-024-02545-6 (2024)

Marti, S.et al.Quantum squeezing in a nonlinear mechanical oscillator.Nat. Phys.20, 1448–1453, DOI: 10.1038/s41567-024-02545-6 (2024)

2024 doi
[153]

& Bloch, I

Gross, C. & Bloch, I. Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices.Science357, 995– 1001, DOI: 10.1126/science.aal3837 (2017). Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

2017 doi
[154]

& Stobbe, S

Lodahl, P., Mahmoodian, S. & Stobbe, S. Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures.Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 347–400, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.347 (2015)

2015 doi
[155]

Bradac, C., Gao, W., Forneris, J., Trusheim, M. E. & Aharonovich, I. Quantum nanophotonics with group IV defects in diamond.Nat. Commun.10, 5625, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13332-w (2019)

2019 doi
[156]

Phys.15, 483–489, DOI: 10.1038/s41567-019-0436-5 (2019)

Wang, D.et al.Turning a molecule into a coherent two-level quantum system.Nat. Phys.15, 483–489, DOI: 10.1038/s41567-019-0436-5 (2019)

2019 doi
[157]

1126/sciadv.abc8268 (2020)

Uppu, R.et al.Scalable integrated single-photon source.Science Advances6, eabc8268, DOI: 10. 1126/sciadv.abc8268 (2020)

2020
[158]

Arcari, M.et al.Near-unity coupling efficiency of a quantum emitter to a photonic crystal waveguide. Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 093603, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.093603 (2014)

2014 doi
[159]

Komza, L.et al.Multiplexed color centers in a silicon photonic cavity array.Optica12, 1400–1405, DOI: 10.1364/OPTICA.564691 (2025)

2025 doi
[160]

Nature432, 200–203, DOI: 10.1038/nature03119 (2004)

Yoshie, T.et al.Vacuum rabi splitting with a single quantum dot in a photonic crystal nanocavity. Nature432, 200–203, DOI: 10.1038/nature03119 (2004). 30

2004 doi
[161]

Hennessy, K.et al.Quantum nature of a strongly coupled single quantum dot–cavity system.Nature 445, 896–899, DOI: doi.org/10.1038/nature05586 (2007)

2007 doi
[162]

Pscherer, A.et al.Single-molecule vacuum rabi splitting: Four-wave mixing and optical switching at the single-photon level.Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 133603, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.133603 (2021)

2021 doi
[163]

& Muñoz, C

Vivas-Viaña, A., Martín-Cano, D. & Muñoz, C. S. Dissipative stabilization of maximal entanglement between non-identical emitters via two-photon excitation (2023). 2306.06028

2023 arXiv
[164]

& Lipson, M

Ji, X., Roberts, S., Corato-Zanarella, M. & Lipson, M. Methods to achieve ultra-high quality factor silicon nitride resonators.APL Photonics6, 071101, DOI: 10.1063/5.0057881 (2021). https://pubs. aip.org/aip/app/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0057881/19891829/071101_1_5.0057881.pdf

2021 doi
[165]

W.et al.422 Million intrinsic quality factor planar integrated all-waveguide resonator with sub-MHz linewidth.Nat

Puckett, M. W.et al.422 Million intrinsic quality factor planar integrated all-waveguide resonator with sub-MHz linewidth.Nat. Commun.12, 934, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21205-4 (2021)

2021 doi
[166]

Luke, K., Dutt, A., Poitras, C. B. & Lipson, M. Overcoming si3n4 film stress limitations for high quality factor ring resonators.Opt. Express21, 22829–22833, DOI: 10.1364/OE.21.022829 (2013)

2013 doi
[167]

S., Yegnanarayanan, S., Atabaki, A

Hosseini, E. S., Yegnanarayanan, S., Atabaki, A. H., Soltani, M. & Adibi, A. High quality planar silicon nitride microdisk resonators for integrated photonics in the visiblewavelength range.Opt. Express17, 14543–14551, DOI: 10.1364/OE.17.014543 (2009)

2009 doi
[168]

W.et al.High-Q cavity interface for color centers in thin film diamond.Nat

Ding, S. W.et al.High-Q cavity interface for color centers in thin film diamond.Nat. Commun.15, 6358, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50667-5 (2024)

2024 doi
[169]

A., O’boyle, M., Hamann, H

Vlasov, Y. A., O’boyle, M., Hamann, H. F. & McNab, S. J. Active control of slow light on a chip with photonic crystal waveguides.Nature438, 65–69, DOI: 10.1038/nature04210 (2005)

2005 doi
[170]

Lodahl, P.et al.Chiral quantum optics.Nature541, 473–480, DOI: 10.1038/nature21037 (2017)

2017 doi
[171]

Söllner, I.et al.Deterministic photon–emitter coupling in chiral photonic circuits.Nature Nanotech 10, 775–778, DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2015.159 (2015)

2015 doi
[172]

Gramotnev, D. K. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Plasmonics beyond the diffraction limit.Nat. Photon.4, 83–91, DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2009.282 (2010)

2009 doi
[173]

M.et al.Probing the mechanisms of large purcell enhancement in plasmonic nanoanten- nas.Nat

Akselrod, G. M.et al.Probing the mechanisms of large purcell enhancement in plasmonic nanoanten- nas.Nat. Photon.8, 835–840, DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2014.228 (2014)

2014 doi
[174]

I.et al.Ultrabright Room-Temperature Sub-Nanosecond emission from single Nitrogen- Vacancy centers coupled to nanopatch antennas.Nano Lett.18, 4837–4844, DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett

Bogdanov, S. I.et al.Ultrabright Room-Temperature Sub-Nanosecond emission from single Nitrogen- Vacancy centers coupled to nanopatch antennas.Nano Lett.18, 4837–4844, DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett. 8b01415 (2018)

2018 doi
[175]

Ng, C.et al.Plasmonic near-complete optical absorption and its applications.Advanced Optical Materials7, 1801660, DOI: 10.1002/adom.201801660 (2019)

2019 doi
[176]

Andersen, S. K. H.et al.Hybrid Plasmonic Bullseye Antennas for Efficient Photon Collection.ACS Photonics5, 692–698, DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01194 (2018)

2018 doi
[177]

A.et al.Ultrafast plasmon dynamics of Low-Loss sodium metasurfaces.ACS Nano19, 27310–27317, DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5c04946 (2025)

Kocoj, C. A.et al.Ultrafast plasmon dynamics of Low-Loss sodium metasurfaces.ACS Nano19, 27310–27317, DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5c04946 (2025)

2025 doi
[178]

Gao, Z.et al.Low-Loss plasmonics with nanostructured potassium and Sodium–Potassium liquid alloys.Nano Lett.23, 7150–7156, DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c02054 (2023)

2023 doi
[179]

& Englund, D

Choi, H., Heuck, M. & Englund, D. Self-similar nanocavity design with ultrasmall mode volume for single-photon nonlinearities.Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 223605, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.223605 (2017). 31

2017 doi
[180]

Albrechtsen, M.et al.Nanometer-scale photon confinement in topology-optimized dielectric cavities. Nat. Commun.13, 6281, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33874-w (2022)

2022 doi
[181]

M.et al.Cavity qed with molecular defects coupled to a photonic crystal cavity (2025)

Lange, C. M.et al.Cavity qed with molecular defects coupled to a photonic crystal cavity (2025). ArXiv:2506.01917 [quant-ph], 2506.01917

2025 arXiv
[182]

K.et al.Long-range dipole–dipole interactions in a plasmonic lattice.Nano Lett.22, 22– 28, DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02835 (2022)

Boddeti, A. K.et al.Long-range dipole–dipole interactions in a plasmonic lattice.Nano Lett.22, 22– 28, DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02835 (2022). PMID: 34672615, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett. 1c02835

2022 doi
[183]

S., Petrov, M

Sheremet, A. S., Petrov, M. I., Iorsh, I. V., Poshakinskiy, A. V. & Poddubny, A. N. Waveguide quantum electrodynamics: Collective radiance and photon-photon correlations.Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 015002, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.95.015002 (2023)

2023 doi
[184]

Guerin, W., Araújo, M. O. & Kaiser, R. Subradiance in a large cloud of cold atoms.Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 083601, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.083601 (2016)

2016 doi
[185]

& Yavuz, D

Das, D., Lemberger, B. & Yavuz, D. D. Subradiance and superradiance-to-subradiance transition in dilute atomic clouds.Phys. Rev. A102, 043708, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.102.043708 (2020)

2020 doi
[186]

Otten, M.et al.Entanglement of two, three, or four plasmonically coupled quantum dots.Phys. Rev. B92, 125432, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.125432 (2015)

2015 doi
[187]

& Koshino, K

Asaoka, R., Gea-Banacloche, J., Tokunaga, Y. & Koshino, K. Stimulated emission of superradi- ant atoms in waveguide quantum electrodynamics.Phys. Rev. Appl.18, 064006, DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevApplied.18.064006 (2022)

2022
[188]

Subradiant edgestates inanatom chainwith waveguide-mediatedhopping

McDonnell, C.&Olmos, B. Subradiant edgestates inanatom chainwith waveguide-mediatedhopping. Quantum6, 805, DOI: 10.22331/q-2022-09-15-805 (2022)

2022 doi
[189]

Kim, K.-Y.et al.Cavity-mediated collective emission from steady-state subradiance.Nat. Commun. 16, 6346, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-61629-w (2025)

2025 doi
[190]

J.et al.Resonant energy transfer and collectively driven emitters in waveguide qed

van Diepen, C. J.et al.Resonant energy transfer and collectively driven emitters in waveguide qed. Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033169, DOI: 10.1103/mrll-mbwd (2025)

2025 doi
[191]

Rattenbacher, D.et al.On-chip interference of scattering from two individual molecules.Optica10, 1595–1601, DOI: 10.1364/OPTICA.502221 (2023)

2023 doi
[192]

Büse, A.et al.Symmetryprotectionofphotonicentanglementintheinteractionwithasinglenanoaper- ture.Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 173901, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.173901 (2018)

2018 doi
[193]

S., Miroshnichenko, A

Maksymov, I. S., Miroshnichenko, A. E. & Kivshar, Y. S. Plasmonic nanoantennas for efficient control of polarization-entangled photon pairs.Phys. Rev. A86, 011801, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.011801 (2012)

2012 doi
[194]

& Rockstuhl, C

Hou, J., Słowik, K., Lederer, F. & Rockstuhl, C. Dissipation-driven entanglement between qubits mediated by plasmonic nanoantennas.Phys. Rev. B89, 235413, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.235413 (2014)

2014 doi
[195]

& Pelton, M

Leng, H., Szychowski, B., Daniel, M.-C. & Pelton, M. Strong coupling and induced transparency at room temperature with single quantum dots and gap plasmons.Nat. Commun.9, 4012, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06450-4 (2018)

2018 doi
[196]

& Fernández-Domínguez, A

Cuartero-González, A. & Fernández-Domínguez, A. I. Dipolar and quadrupolar excitons coupled to a nanoparticle-on-mirror cavity.Phys. Rev. B101, 035403, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.035403 (2020)

2020 doi
[197]

& Zhang, Z

Kang, B., Hu, H., Chen, H. & Zhang, Z. Long-range dipole-dipole interactions enabled with the guided plasmons of matched nanoparticle-on-mirror antenna pairs.Phys. Rev. A111, 013526, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.111.013526 (2025). 32

2025 doi
[198]

& Demetriadou, A

Bedingfield, K., Yuen, B. & Demetriadou, A. Subradiant entanglement in plasmonic nanocavities. Phys. Rev. B111, 075420, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.111.075420 (2025)

2025 doi
[199]

K.et al.Reducing effective system dimensionality with long-range collective dipole-dipole interactions.Phys

Boddeti, A. K.et al.Reducing effective system dimensionality with long-range collective dipole-dipole interactions.Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 173803, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.173803 (2024)

2024 doi
[200]

Freire-Fernández, F.et al.Room-temperature polariton lasing from cdse core-only nanoplatelets.ACS Nano18, 15177–15184, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.08395 (2024)

2024 doi arXiv
[201]

Hong, C., Zheng, Z., Patel, S. K. & Odom, T. W. High-chirality polariton lasing from symmetry-broken plasmonic lattices.ACS Nano19, 18824–18832, DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5c04290 (2025)

2025 doi
[202]

De Giorgi, M.et al.Interaction and coherence of a plasmon–exciton polariton condensate.ACS Photonics5, 3666–3672, DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00662 (2018)

2018 doi
[203]

000031 (2017)

Ramezani, M.et al.Plasmon-exciton-polariton lasing.Optica4, 31–37, DOI: 10.1364/OPTICA.4. 000031 (2017)

2017 doi
[204]

Papon, C.et al.Independent operation of two waveguide-integrated quantum emitters.Phys. Rev. Appl.19, L061003, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.L061003 (2023)

2023 doi
[205]

Chu, X.-L.et al.Independent electrical control of two quantum dots coupled through a photonic-crystal waveguide.Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 033606, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.033606 (2023)

2023 doi
[206]

E., Vuletić, V

Chang, D. E., Vuletić, V. & Lukin, M. D. Quantum nonlinear optics—photon by photon.Nat. Photon. 8, 685–694, DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2014.192 (2014)

2014 doi
[207]

& Deutsch, M

Imamo¯ glu, A., Schmidt, H., Woods, G. & Deutsch, M. Strongly interacting photons in a nonlinear cavity.Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 1467–1470, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.1467 (1997)

1997 doi
[208]

D.et al.Dipole blockade and quantum information processing in mesoscopic atomic ensem- bles.Phys

Lukin, M. D.et al.Dipole blockade and quantum information processing in mesoscopic atomic ensem- bles.Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 037901, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.037901 (2001)

2001 doi
[209]

Miranowicz, A., Paprzycka, M., Liu, Y.-x., Bajer, J. c. v. & Nori, F. Two-photon and three-photon blockades in driven nonlinear systems.Phys. Rev. A87, 023809, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.023809 (2013)

2013 doi
[210]

Kala, A.et al.Opportunities and challenges of solid-state quantum nonlinear optics.ACS Nano19, 14557–14578, DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.4c12657 (2025)

2025 doi
[211]

& Sanvitto, D

Gerace, D., Laussy, F. & Sanvitto, D. Quantum nonlinearities at the single-particle level.Nat. Mater. 18, 200–201, DOI: 10.1038/s41563-019-0298-3 (2019)

2019 doi
[212]

Mater.18, 219–222, DOI: 10.1038/s41563-019-0282-y (2019)

Delteil, A.et al.Towards polariton blockade of confined exciton–polaritons.Nat. Mater.18, 219–222, DOI: 10.1038/s41563-019-0282-y (2019)

2019 doi
[213]

Mater.21, 767–772, DOI: 10.1038/s41563-022-01230-4 (2022)

Orfanakis, K.et al.Rydberg exciton–polaritons in a cu2o microcavity.Nat. Mater.21, 767–772, DOI: 10.1038/s41563-022-01230-4 (2022)

2022 doi
[214]

Makhonin, M.et al.Nonlinear rydberg exciton-polaritons in cu2o microcavities.Light: Science & Applications13, 47, DOI: 10.1038/s41377-024-01382-9 (2024)

2024 doi
[215]

Commun.13, 6341, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33940-3 (2022)

Datta, B.et al.Highly nonlinear dipolar exciton-polaritons in bilayer mos2.Nat. Commun.13, 6341, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33940-3 (2022)

2022 doi
[216]

Zhang, L.et al.Van der waals heterostructure polaritons with moiré-induced nonlinearity.Nature 591, 61–65, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03228-5 (2021)

2021 doi
[217]

V., Otterbach, J., Fleischhauer, M., Pohl, T

Gorshkov, A. V., Otterbach, J., Fleischhauer, M., Pohl, T. & Lukin, M. D. Photon-photon interactions via rydberg blockade.Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 133602, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.133602 (2011). 33

2011 doi
[218]

Kim, B.et al.A weakly-interacting many-body system of rydberg polaritons based on electromag- netically induced transparency.Communications Physics4, 101, DOI: 10.1038/s42005-021-00604-5 (2021)

2021 doi
[219]

D.et al.Cooperative atom-light interaction in a blockaded rydberg ensemble.Phys

Pritchard, J. D.et al.Cooperative atom-light interaction in a blockaded rydberg ensemble.Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 193603, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.193603 (2010)

2010 doi
[220]

& Dürr, S

Tiarks, D., Schmidt-Eberle, S., Stolz, T., Rempe, G. & Dürr, S. A photon-photon quantum gate based on rydberg interactions.Nat. Phys.15, 124–126, DOI: 10.1038/s41567-018-0313-7 (2019)

2019 doi
[221]

Stolz, T.et al.Quantum-logic gate between two optical photons with an average efficiency above 40%. Phys. Rev. X12, 021035, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.12.021035 (2022)

2022 doi
[222]

Peyronel, T.et al.Quantum nonlinear optics with single photons enabled by strongly interacting atoms.Nature488, 57–60, DOI: 10.1038/nature11361 (2012)

2012 doi
[223]

Dudin, Y. O. & Kuzmich, A. Strongly interacting rydberg excitations of a cold atomic gas.Sci- ence336, 887–889, DOI: 10.1126/science.1217901 (2012). https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/ science.1217901

2012 doi
[224]

Firstenberg, O.et al.Attractive photons in a quantum nonlinear medium.Nature502, 71–75, DOI: 10.1038/nature12512 (2013)

2013 doi
[225]

& Pohl, T

Walther, V., Johne, R. & Pohl, T. Giant optical nonlinearities from rydberg excitons in semiconductor microcavities.Nat. Commun.9, 1309, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03742-7 (2018)

2018 doi
[226]

& Bayer, M

Kazimierczuk, T., Fröhlich, D., Scheel, S., Stolz, H. & Bayer, M. Giant rydberg excitons in the copper oxide cu2o.Nature514, 343–347, DOI: 10.1038/nature13832 (2014)

2014 doi
[227]

A.et al.Rydberg excitons in synthetic cuprous oxidecu 2O.Phys

Lynch, S. A.et al.Rydberg excitons in synthetic cuprous oxidecu 2O.Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 084602, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.084602 (2021)

2021 doi
[228]

S., Rajendran, S

Paul, A. S., Rajendran, S. K., Ziemkiewicz, D., Volz, T. & Ohadi, H. Local tuning of rydberg exciton energies in nanofabricated cu2o pillars.Communications Materials5, 43, DOI: 10.1038/ s43246-024-00481-9 (2024)

2024
[229]

Steinhauer, S.et al.Rydberg excitons in cu2o microcrystals grown on a silicon platform.Communi- cations Materials1, 11, DOI: 10.1038/s43246-020-0013-6 (2020)

2020 doi
[230]

DeLange, J.et al.Highly-excited rydberg excitons in synthetic thin-film cuprous oxide.Scientific Reports13, 16881, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-41465-y (2023)

2023 doi
[231]

Barua, K.et al.Bottom-up fabrication of 2d rydberg exciton arrays in cuprous oxide.Communications Materials6, 21, DOI: 10.1038/s43246-025-00742-1 (2025)

2025 doi
[232]

Gallagher, L. A. P.et al.Microwave-optical coupling via rydberg excitons in cuprous oxide.Phys. Rev. Research4, 013031, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.013031 (2022)

2022 doi
[233]

Heckötter, J.et al.Asymmetric rydberg blockade of giant excitons in cuprous oxide.Nat. Commun. 12, 3556, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23852-z (2021)

2021 doi
[234]

& Pohl, T

Walther, V. & Pohl, T. Plasma-enhanced interaction and optical nonlinearities ofcu 2Orydberg excitons.Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 097401, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.097401 (2020)

2020 doi
[235]

Morin, C.et al.Self-kerr effect across the yellow rydberg series of excitons incu2O.Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 137401, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.137401 (2022)

2022 doi
[236]

Photon.9, 30–34, DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2014.304 (2015)

Liu, X.et al.Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional atomic crystals.Nat. Photon.9, 30–34, DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2014.304 (2015). 34

2014 doi
[237]

Photon.11, 491–496, DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2017.121 (2017)

Sun, Z.et al.Optical control of room-temperature valley polaritons.Nat. Photon.11, 491–496, DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2017.121 (2017)

2017 doi
[238]

& İmamoğlu, A

Zeytinoğlu, S. & İmamoğlu, A. Interaction-induced photon blockade using an atomically thin mirror embedded in a microcavity.Phys. Rev. A98, 051801, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.051801 (2018)

2018 doi
[239]

Walther, V., Zhang, L., Yelin, S. F. & Pohl, T. Nonclassical light from finite-range interactions in a two-dimensional quantum mirror.Phys. Rev. B105, 075307, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.075307 (2022)

2022 doi
[240]

Commun.12, 2269, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22537-x (2021)

Gu, J.et al.Enhanced nonlinear interaction of polaritons via excitonic rydberg states in monolayer wse2.Nat. Commun.12, 2269, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22537-x (2021)

2021 doi
[241]

Takemura, N., Trebaol, S., Wouters, M., Portella-Oberli, M. T. & Deveaud, B. Polaritonic feshbach resonance.Nat. Phys.10, 500–504, DOI: 10.1038/nphys2999 (2014)

2014 doi
[242]

https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/ science.abj3831

Schwartz, I.et al.Electrically tunable feshbach resonances in twisted bilayer semiconductors.Sci- ence374, 336–340, DOI: 10.1126/science.abj3831 (2021). https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/ science.abj3831

2021 doi
[243]

Wagner, M.et al.Feshbach resonances in exciton–charge-carrier scattering in semiconductor bilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 076903, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.076903 (2025)

2025 doi
[244]

M., Korn, T., Höfling, S

Schneider, C., Glazov, M. M., Korn, T., Höfling, S. & Urbaszek, B. Two-dimensional semiconductors in the regime of strong light-matter coupling.Nat. Commun.9, 2695, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04866-6 (2018)

2018 doi
[245]

Luo, Y.et al.Strong light-matter coupling in van der waals materials.Light: Science & Applications 13, 203, DOI: 10.1038/s41377-024-01523-0 (2024)

2024 doi
[246]

Hein, M.et al.Entanglement in graph states and its applications.arXiv preprint quant-ph/0602096 DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0602096 (2006)

2006 doi arXiv
[247]

& Briegel, H

Raussendorf, R. & Briegel, H. J. A one-way quantum computer.Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 5188, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5188 (2001)

2001 doi
[248]

Browne, D. E. & Rudolph, T. Resource-efficient linear optical quantum computation.Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010501, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.01050 (2005)

2005 doi
[249]

Zhong, H.-S.et al.12-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion.Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 250505, DOI: 10. 1103/PhysRevLett.121.2505 (2018)

2018
[250]

Walther, P.et al.Experimental one-way quantum computing.Nature434, 169–176, DOI: 10.1038/ nature03347 (2005)

2005
[251]

Varnava, M., Browne, D. E. & Rudolph, T. How good must single photon sources and detectors be for efficient linear optical quantum computation?Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 060502, DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.100.060502 (2008)

2008
[252]

& Guha, S

Pant, M., Krovi, H., Englund, D. & Guha, S. Rate-distance tradeoff and resource costs for all-optical quantum repeaters.Phys. Rev. A95, 012304, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.012304 (2017)

2017 doi
[253]

& Rempe, G

Thomas, P., Ruscio, L., Morin, O. & Rempe, G. Efficient generation of entangled multiphoton graph states from a single atom.Nature608, 677–681, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04987-5 (2022)

2022 doi
[254]

& Rempe, G

Thomas, P., Ruscio, L., Morin, O. & Rempe, G. Fusion of deterministically generated photonic graph states.Nature629, 567–572, DOI: 10.1038/s41 (2024). 35

2024 doi
[255]

Hilaire, P., Vidro, L., Eisenberg, H. S. & Economou, S. E. Near-deterministic hybrid generation of arbitrary photonic graph states using a single quantum emitter and linear optics.Quantum7, 992, DOI: 10.22331/q-2023-04-27-992 (2023)

2023 doi
[256]

Lindner, N. H. & Rudolph, T. Proposal for pulsed on-demand sources of photonic cluster state strings. Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 113602, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.113602 (2009)

2009 doi
[257]

Technol.4, 025011, DOI: 10.1088/2058-9565/ab0a9b (2019)

Lee, J.et al.A quantum dot as a source of time-bin entangled multi-photon states.Quantum Sci. Technol.4, 025011, DOI: 10.1088/2058-9565/ab0a9b (2019)

doi
[258]

E., Lindner, N

Economou, S. E., Lindner, N. H. & Rudolph, T. Optically generated 2-dimensional photonic cluster statefromcoupledquantumdots.Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 093601, DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.093601 (2010)

2010 doi
[259]

& Economou, S

Gimeno-Segovia, M., Rudolph, T. & Economou, S. E. Deterministic generation of large-scale entangled photonic cluster state from interacting solid state emitters.Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 070501, DOI: 10. 1103/PhysRevLett.123.070501 (2019)

2019
[260]

Schwartz, I.et al.Deterministic generation of a cluster state of entangled photons.Science354, 434–437, DOI: 10.1126/science.aah4758 (2016)

2016 doi
[261]

Commun.16, 4337, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-59693-3 (2025)

Huet, H.et al.Deterministic and reconfigurable graph state generation with a single solid-state quantum emitter.Nat. Commun.16, 4337, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-59693-3 (2025)

2025 doi
[262]

Taminiau, T.et al.Detection and control of individual nuclear spins using a weakly coupled electron spin.Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 137602, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.137602 (2012)

2012 doi
[263]

Nature484, 82–86, DOI: 10.1038/nature10900 (2012)

Van der Sar, T.et al.Decoherence-protected quantum gates for a hybrid solid-state spin register. Nature484, 82–86, DOI: 10.1038/nature10900 (2012)

2012 doi
[264]

& Economou, S

Takou, E., Barnes, E. & Economou, S. E. Precise control of entanglement in multinuclear spin registers coupled to defects.Phys. Rev. X13, 011004, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011004 (2023)

2023 doi
[265]

& Economou, S

Takou, E., Barnes, E. & Economou, S. E. Generation of genuine all-way entanglement in defect- nuclear spin systems through dynamical decoupling sequences.Quantum8, 1304, DOI: 10.22331/ q-2024-03-28-1304 (2024)

2024
[266]

D., Ouellet, M., Klein, A

Minnella, J. D., Ouellet, M., Klein, A. R. & Bassett, L. C. Single-gate, multipartite entanglement on a room-temperature quantum register, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.08465 (2025). 2508.08465

2025 doi
[267]

Commun.7, 11526, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11526 (2016)

Cramer, J.et al.Repeated quantum error correction on a continuously encoded qubit by real-time feedback.Nat. Commun.7, 11526, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11526 (2016)

2016 doi
[268]

Y., Rendler, T.et al.Coherent control of single spins in silicon carbide at room temperature.Nat

Widmann, M., Lee, S. Y., Rendler, T.et al.Coherent control of single spins in silicon carbide at room temperature.Nat. Mater.14, 164–168, DOI: 10.1038/nmat4145 (2015)

2015 doi
[269]

P., Miao, K

Bourassa, A., Anderson, C. P., Miao, K. C.et al.Entanglement and control of single nuclear spins in isotopically engineered silicon carbide.Nat. Mater.19, 1319–1325, DOI: 10.1038/s41563-020-00802-6 (2020)

2020 doi
[270]

& Economou, S

Dakis, F., Takou, E., Barnes, E. & Economou, S. E. High-throughput assessment of the con- trollability of a nuclear-spin register coupled to a defect.Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 054073, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.22.054073 (2024)

2024 doi
[271]

Bergeron, L.et al.Silicon-integrated telecommunications photon-spin interface.PRX Quantum1, 020301, DOI: 10.1103/PRXQuantum.1.020301 (2020)

2020 doi
[272]

Durand, A.et al.Broad diversity of near-infrared single-photon emitters in silicon.Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 083602, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.083602 (2021). 36

2021 doi
[273]

& Gali, A

Udvarhelyi, P., Somogyi, B., Thiering, G. & Gali, A. Identification of a telecom wavelength single photon emitter in silicon.Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 196402, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.196402 (2021)

2021 doi
[274]

Islam, F.et al.Cavity-enhanced emission from a silicon t center.Nano Lett.24, 319–325, DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c04056 (2023)

2023 doi
[275]

& Chen, S

Johnston, A., Felix-Rendon, U., Wong, Y.-E. & Chen, S. Cavity-coupled telecom atomic source in silicon.Nat. Commun.15, 2350, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46643-8 (2024)

2024 doi
[276]

Commun.14, 3321, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-38559-6 (2023)

Redjem, W.et al.All-silicon quantum light source by embedding an atomic emissive center in a nanophotonic cavity.Nat. Commun.14, 3321, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-38559-6 (2023)

2023 doi
[277]

Commun.15, 5296, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49302-0 (2024)

Saggio, V.et al.Cavity-enhanced single artificial atoms in silicon.Nat. Commun.15, 5296, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49302-0 (2024)

2024 doi
[278]

& Economou, S

Buterakos, D., Barnes, E. & Economou, S. E. Deterministic generation of all-photonic quantum repeaters from solid-state emitters.Phys. Rev. X7, 041023, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.041023 (2017)

2017 doi
[279]

Li, B., Economou, S. E. & Barnes, E. Photonic resource state generation from a minimal number of quantum emitters.npj Quantum Information8, 11, DOI: 10.1038/s41534-022-00522-6 (2022)

2022 doi
[280]

& Pan, J.-W

Gühne, O., Lu, C.-Y., Gao, W.-B. & Pan, J.-W. Toolbox for entanglement detection and fidelity estimation.Phys. Rev. A: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.76, 030305, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.030305 (2007)

2007 doi
[281]

& Gühne, O

Tóth, G. & Gühne, O. Entanglement detection in the stabilizer formalism.Phys. Rev. A: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.72, 022340, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.022340 (2005)

2005 doi
[282]

& Tóth, G

Gühne, O. & Tóth, G. Entanglement detection.Physics Reports474, 1–75, DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep. 2009.02.00 (2009)

2009 doi
[284]

Tiurev, K.et al.High-fidelity multiphoton-entangled cluster state with solid-state quantum emitters in photonic nanostructures.Phys. Rev. A105, L030601, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.105.L030601 (2022)

2022 doi
[285]

& Montanaro, A

Pallister, S., Linden, N. & Montanaro, A. Optimal verification of entangled states with local measure- ments.Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 170502, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.210504 (2018)

2018 doi
[286]

& Zhu, H

Dangniam, N., Han, Y.-G. & Zhu, H. Optimal verification of stabilizer states.Physical Review Research 2, 043323, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043323 (2020)

2020 doi
[287]

K., Schmied, R

Pezze, L., Smerzi, A., Oberthaler, M. K., Schmied, R. & Treutlein, P. Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles.Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 035005, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.90. 035005 (2018)

2018 doi
[288]

Zhan, Y., Hilaire, P., Barnes, E., Economou, S. E. & Sun, S. Performance analysis of quantum repeaters enabled by deterministically generated photonic graph states.Quantum7, 924, DOI: 10. 22331/q-2023-02-16-924 (2023)

2023
[289]

Holland, M. J. & Burnett, K. Interferometric detection of optical phase shifts at the heisenberg limit. Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 1355, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1355 (1993)

1993 doi
[290]

& Milburn, G

Sanders, B. & Milburn, G. Optimal quantum measurements for phase estimation.Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2944, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.2944 (1995)

1995 doi
[291]

& Dowling, J

Lee, H., Kok, P. & Dowling, J. P. A quantum rosetta stone for interferometry.J. Mod. Opt.49, 2325–2338, DOI: 10.1080/0950034021000011536 (2002). 37

2002 doi
[292]

Dowling, J. P. Quantum optical metrology–the lowdown on high-N00N states.Contemporary physics 49, 125–143, DOI: 10.1080/00107510802091298 (2008)

2008 doi
[293]

Goban, A.et al.Superradiance for atoms trapped along a photonic crystal waveguide.Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 063601, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.063601 (2015)

2015 doi
[294]

Raussendorf, R., Browne, D. E. & Briegel, H. J. Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states.Phys. Rev. A68, 022312, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.022312 (2003)

2003 doi
[295]

Commun.14, 912, DOI: 10.1038/ s41467-023-36493-1 (2023)

Bartolucci, S.et al.Fusion-based quantum computation.Nat. Commun.14, 912, DOI: 10.1038/ s41467-023-36493-1 (2023)

2023
[296]

& Stace, T

Bolt, A., Duclos-Cianci, G., Poulin, D. & Stace, T. Foliated quantum error-correcting codes.Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 070501, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.070501 (2016)

2016 doi
[297]

& Brown, B

Paesani, S. & Brown, B. J. High-threshold quantum computing by fusing one-dimensional cluster states.Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 120603, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.120603 (2023)

2023 doi
[298]

& Lee, S

Song, W., Kang, N., Kim, Y. & Lee, S. Encoded-fusion-based quantum computation for high thresholds with linear optics.Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 050605, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.050605 (2024)

2024 doi
[299]

& Lo, H.-K

Azuma, K., Tamaki, K. & Lo, H.-K. All-photonic quantum repeaters.Nat. Commun.6, 6787, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7787 (2015)

2015 doi
[300]

Borregaard, J.et al.One-way quantum repeater based on near-deterministic photon-emitter interfaces. Phys. Rev. X10, 021071, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.021071 (2020). 38

2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [121]

Cygorek, M.et al.Signatures of cooperative emission in photon coincidence: Superradiance versus measurement-induced cooperativity.Phys. Rev. A107, 023718, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.107.023718 (2023)

doi:10.1103/physreva.107.023718 2023

[2] [95]

M.et al.Two-emitter multimode cavity quantum electrodynamics in thin-film silicon carbide photonics.Phys

Lukin, D. M.et al.Two-emitter multimode cavity quantum electrodynamics in thin-film silicon carbide photonics.Phys. Rev. X13, 011005, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011005 (2023)

doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.011005 2023

[3] [103]

Rainò, G.et al.Superfluorescence from lead halide perovskite quantum dot superlattices.Nature563, 671–675, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0683-0 (2018)

doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0683-0 2018

[4] [1]

Kimble, H. J. The quantum internet.Nature453, 1023–1030, DOI: 10.1038/nature07127 (2008)

doi:10.1038/nature07127 2008

[5] [2]

Scaling up solid-state quantum photonics.Science362, 646–647, DOI: 10.1126/science

Lodahl, P. Scaling up solid-state quantum photonics.Science362, 646–647, DOI: 10.1126/science. aav3076 (2018)

doi:10.1126/science 2018

[6] [3]

Turunen, M.et al.Quantum photonics with layered 2d materials.Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 219–236, DOI: 10.1038/s42254-021-00408-0 (2022)

doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00408-0 2022

[7] [4]

J.et al.Quantum-coherent nanoscience.Nat

Heinrich, A. J.et al.Quantum-coherent nanoscience.Nat. Nanotechnol.16, 1318–1329, DOI: 10.1038/ s41565-021-00994-1 (2021)

2021

[8] [5]

E.et al.Photon-mediated interactions between quantum emitters in a diamond nanocavity

Evans, R. E.et al.Photon-mediated interactions between quantum emitters in a diamond nanocavity. Science362, 662–665, DOI: 10.1126/science.aau4691 (2018)

doi:10.1126/science.aau4691 2018