Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 134 references

A New Approach to Compiling Exoatmospheric Target Lists And Quantifying the Ground-Based Resources Needed to Vet Them

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read New exoplanet list flags hundreds of wasted JWST hours

desk verdict The abstract describes a useful survey-planning study, but the supplied full text is a quantum-computing paper, so the actual exoplanet work is unverifiable from this packet. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.03801 v2 pith:PP5RYQTL submitted 2025-08-05 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.IM

Jennifer A. Burt , Robert T. Zellem , David R. Ciardi , Shubham Kanodia , Geoffrey Bryden , Tiffany Kataria , Kyle A. Pearson , Jessie L. Christiansen
show 3 more authors
Charles Beichman B.J. Fulton Mark Swain
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.IM
keywords exoplanetatmospherestransmissionspectroscopyemissiontargetselectionephemerisuncertaintiesground-basedfollow-upJWSTatmosphericcharacterization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the coming wave of exoplanet atmosphere missions—HST, JWST, Pandora, Ariel, Roman, and the Habitable Worlds Observatory—needs a new way of choosing which planets to observe. The authors propose building large target lists by combining the usual transmission and emission spectroscopy figures of merit with deliberate, even sampling of planets across a range of radii and equilibrium temperatures, rather than only picking the most favorable targets. Applying that approach yields a sample of 750 transmission-spectroscopy targets and 150 emission-spectroscopy targets. The paper then estimates that, given current uncertainties in orbital periods, transit epochs, and eccentricities, observing these lists as they stand could waste hundreds of hours of space-based telescope time, and that obtaining precise enough masses from the ground would exceed 100 nights of 10-meter-class telescope time. If these numbers are right, survey planners would need to refresh ephemerides and budget substantial ground-based follow-up before allocating space-based observing time.

What carries the argument

The central object is the survey target list itself, assembled by combining standard transmission and emission spectroscopy figures of merit with even sampling over bins in planet radius and equilibrium temperature. The argument is carried by using that list to quantify two resource costs: the space-based hours lost when a target's transit or eclipse timing is too uncertain (a 'stale' ephemeris), and the ground-based 10-meter-class nights needed to reach the mass precision that atmospheric interpretation requires. The paper does not, in the abstract, state the numerical thresholds for 'stale' or for sufficient mass precision, but those thresholds are what turn raw catalogs into the reported hour and night totals.

What would settle it

Recompute the wasted-hours estimate using the actual current uncertainty distribution of a public exoplanet catalog: if the fraction of the 750+150 targets whose period, epoch, or eccentricity uncertainties exceed the paper's staleness cutoff is much smaller than assumed, the 'hundreds of hours' figure would fall accordingly. Similarly, if a survey of published retrievals showed that atmospheres can be interpreted with less precise masses than the paper requires, the ground-based time estimate would shrink.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that an exoatmospheric survey target list built from a balanced-sampling philosophy, not just from best-figure-of-merit ranking, is the right foundation for the next decade of atmosphere characterization, and that such a list is practical at the scale of 750 transmission and 150 emission targets. The paper further claims that the bottleneck is not target discovery but target vetting: stale transit and eclipse ephemerides—outdated predictions of when a planet passes in front of or behind its star—could send hundreds of hours of space-based observations to the wrong time slots, and the ground-based radial-velocity work needed to pin down masses precisely enough for atmospheric interpretation would take more than 100 nights on 10-meter-class telescopes. The forward-looking recommendation is that community preparation efforts should focus on keeping ephemerides fresh and organizing mass-measurement campaigns as a prerequisite for efficient use of current and future space observatories.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative results stand on the paper's unstated choices for which ephemeris uncertainties count as 'stale', how finely to bin planets by radius and equilibrium temperature, and what mass precision counts as sufficient for atmospheric interpretation; if those thresholds were loosened or tightened, the 750/150 sample size and the estimated hundreds of wasted hours and 100+ follow-up nights would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Survey schedulers for JWST, Pandora, Ariel, and Roman should treat ephemeris refresh as a prerequisite before allocating time to transmission or emission observations.
  • A balanced target list covering a range of radii and equilibrium temperatures supports population-level atmospheric studies, not just individual highlight targets.
  • Ground-based mass measurement on 10-meter-class telescopes needs to be organized as a community campaign exceeding 100 nights to support the 750+150 target sample.
  • The same vetting strategy applies to the Habitable Worlds Observatory and other future missions expected later in the 2030s and 2040s.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's method could be turned into a living target list that updates as new ephemerides and mass measurements arrive; the same 'staleness' logic could be applied to any transit or eclipse survey, not just atmosphere characterization.
  • If the hundreds-of-hours estimate holds, wavelength-calibration and detector overheads on space observatories could make the actual wasted time larger than modeled, since a mistimed observation often yields no usable spectrum at all.
  • The 100+ nights figure implies that access to multiple 10-meter-class facilities or coordination across time-domain surveys will be needed; without that coordination, the space-based sample may silently shrink to the subset with already-precise ephemerides.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The abstract of arXiv:2508.03801 describes a new approach to compiling exoatmospheric target lists for transiting exoplanet atmospheric characterization: 750 transmission-spectroscopy targets and 150 emission-spectroscopy targets, a quantification of space-based observing time lost to stale ephemerides ("hundreds of hours"), and an estimate that ground-based mass follow-up "exceeds 100 nights of 10m telescope time," followed by recommendations for the community. However, the full text supplied for review is an entirely different manuscript: arXiv:2508.03796, "Fault-tolerant Fusion-based Quantum Computing with the Four-legged Cat Code," a quantum-computing paper with no exoplanet content. None of the abstract's quantitative claims, target-list construction, ephemeris-uncertainty analysis, or resource estimates appears anywhere in the submitted full text. Consequently, the manuscript as submitted provides no verifiable support for its central claims.

Significance. If the abstract's claims were backed by a complete derivation, the work would be significant: it would quantify a real operational risk for JWST, Pandora, Ariel, Roman, and Habitable Worlds Observatory programs, and it would provide a concrete estimate of the ground-based telescope time required for mass follow-up. Such an analysis could inform survey design and scheduling. However, as submitted, the paper contains no such analysis. There are no machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or falsifiable predictions relevant to the exoplanet claims; the only full text is an unrelated quantum-computing preprint. The exoplanet results cannot be evaluated, reproduced, or even located in the provided manuscript.

major comments (2)
  1. [Full text vs. Abstract] The supplied full text is arXiv:2508.03796, "Fault-tolerant Fusion-based Quantum Computing with the Four-legged Cat Code," which is entirely unrelated to the exoplanet target-list analysis described in the abstract of this submission. None of the abstract's central quantitative claims—the 750-target transmission list, the 150-target emission list, "hundreds of hours of space-based observing could be wasted," or ground-based follow-up "exceeds 100 nights of 10m telescope time"—appears anywhere in the full text. As a result, the manuscript's central claims are unsupported and unverifiable from the submitted material.
  2. [Abstract (threshold definitions)] Even taking the abstract at face value, the quoted resource estimates are not interpretable without a specification of the ephemeris-staleness cutoff (e.g., the allowed transit-timing uncertainty relative to event duration), the radius and equilibrium-temperature sampling bins used to build the target list, and the required mass precision for atmospheric interpretation. None of these definitions is given in the abstract, so the claimed "hundreds of hours" and "exceeds 100 nights" cannot be reproduced or checked.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, first sentence] The phrase "NASA's Hubble and James Webb Space Telescopes" should be "NASA's Hubble Space Telescope and James Webb Space Telescope" for clarity.
  2. [Abstract, sentence 1] The phrase "a golden age as dozens of exoplanet atmospheres are being studied" mixes a metaphor; consider "a golden age in which dozens of exoplanet atmospheres are being studied."
  3. [Abstract, mission list] The expression "all of which are centered around" is non-standard; use "centered on" in the mission list.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity can be identified because the supplied full text is an unrelated quantum-computing manuscript; the exoplanet paper's derivation chain is not available for analysis.

full rationale

The material provided under the arXiv ID 2508.03801 consists of an exoplanet-target-list abstract followed by the full text of arXiv:2508.03796, an unrelated quantum-computing paper by different authors. No equations, target-selection algorithm, ephemeris-uncertainty model, mass-precision threshold, or telescope-time budget model from the actual exoplanet paper are present in the supplied full text. Consequently, there is no derivation chain to walk and no specific reduction to exhibit. Per the hard rules, circularity may only be claimed when the paper itself can be quoted and the reduction shown; none of the enumerated patterns can be established from an abstract alone. The situation is an external verification gap rather than a demonstrated circularity defect, so the honest finding is no identified circularity with a score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All entries are inferred from the abstract only; the supplied full text is an unrelated quantum-computing manuscript. The true paper may define these parameters and assumptions elsewhere.

free parameters (3)
  • Radius and equilibrium-temperature sampling bins = not stated in abstract
    The abstract says targets were selected to more-evenly sample across radii and equilibrium temperatures; the bin edges and target counts (750/150) are design choices that shape the list and are not specified in the abstract.
  • Ephemeris staleness cutoff = not stated
    The wasted-hours estimate depends on a threshold for how far a transit epoch or period can drift before it is considered stale; no threshold appears in the abstract.
  • Required mass precision for ground-based follow-up = not stated
    The estimate of more than 100 nights of 10m telescope time depends on a target mass precision assumed necessary for atmospheric interpretation; the abstract does not state this requirement.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Transmission and emission spectroscopy figures of merit are valid ordering criteria for atmospheric follow-up targets.
    The abstract builds target lists around these figures of merit without deriving or citing their validity; it is a background assumption in the field.
  • domain assumption Current ephemeris catalogs' uncertainties are representative across the chosen target list.
    The wasted-time calculation treats catalog uncertainties in period, epoch, and eccentricity as the input distribution; no catalog source is named in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A New Approach to Compiling Exoatmospheric Target Lists And Quantifying the Ground-Based Resources Needed to Vet Them." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PP5RYQTL

@misc{pith2026250803801,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A New Approach to Compiling Exoatmospheric Target Lists And Quantifying the Ground-Based Resources Needed to Vet Them},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PP5RYQTL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.03801}
}
read the original abstract

Transiting exoplanet atmospheric characterization is currently in a golden age as dozens of exoplanet atmospheres are being studied by NASA's Hubble and James Webb Space Telescopes. This trend is expected to continue with NASA's Pandora Smallsat and Roman Space Telescope and ESA's Ariel mission (all expected to launch within this decade) and NASA's Habitable Worlds Observatory (expected to launch in the early 2040s) all of which are centered around studying the atmospheres of exoplanets. Here we explore a new approach to constructing large scale exoatmospheric survey lists, which combines the use of traditional transmission/emission spectroscopy figures of merit with a focus on more-evenly sampling planets across a range of radii and equilibrium temperatures. After assembling a sample target list comprised of 750 transmission spectroscopy targets and 150 emission spectroscopy targets, we quantify the potential time lost to stale transit and eclipse ephemerides and find that hundreds of hours of space-based observing could be wasted given current uncertainties in orbital periods, transit epochs, and orbital eccentricities. We further estimate the amount of ground-based telescope time necessary to obtain sufficiently precise exoplanet masses and find that it exceeds 100 nights of 10m telescope time. Based upon these findings, we provide a list of recommendations that would make community efforts for preparation and interpretation of atmospheric characterization endeavors more effective and efficient. The strategies we recommend here can be used to support both current (e.g., HST and JWST) and future exoplanet atmosphere characterization missions (e.g., Pandora, Ariel, Roman, and the Habitable Worlds Observatory).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

134 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nielsen and Isaac L

    Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang.Quantum Com- putation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge University Press, 2010

    2010

  2. [2]

    Theory of quan- tum error-correcting codes

    Emanuel Knill and Raymond Laflamme. Theory of quan- tum error-correcting codes. Phys. Rev. A , 55:900–911, Feb 1997

    1997

  3. [3]

    Schoelkopf, Michel H

    Zaki Leghtas, Gerhard Kirchmair, Brian Vlastakis, Robert J. Schoelkopf, Michel H. Devoret, and Maz- yar Mirrahimi. Hardware-efficient autonomous quantum memory protection. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 111:120501, Sep 2013

    2013

  4. [4]

    Albert, Steven Touzard, Robert J

    Mazyar Mirrahimi, Zaki Leghtas, Victor V. Albert, Steven Touzard, Robert J. Schoelkopf, Liang Jiang, and Michel H. Devoret. Dynamically protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quantum computation.New Journal of Physics , 16(4):045014, 2014

    2014

  5. [5]

    Devoret, and Robert J

    Nissim Ofek, Andrei Petrenko, Reinier Heeres, Philip Reinhold, Zaki Leghtas, Brian Vlastakis, Yehan Liu, Luigi Frunzio, S M Girvin, L Jiang, Mazyar Mirrahimi, Michel H. Devoret, and Robert J. Schoelkopf. Extend- ing the lifetime of a quantum bit with error correction in superconducting circuits. Nature, 536(7617):441–445, 2016

    2016

  6. [6]

    V. V. Sivak, A. Eickbusch, B. Royer, S. Singh, I. Tsiout- sios, S. Ganjam, A. Miano, B. L. Brock, A. Z. Ding, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. Devoret. Real-time quantum error correction beyond break-even. Nature, 616(7955):50–55, April 2023

    2023

  7. [7]

    Beating the break- even point with a discrete-variable-encoded logical qubit

    Zhongchu Ni, Sai Li, Xiaowei Deng, Yanyan Cai, Libo Zhang, Weiting Wang, Zhen-Biao Yang, Haifeng Yu, Fei Yan, Song Liu, Chang-Ling Zou, Luyan Sun, Shi-Biao Zheng, Yuan Xu, and Dapeng Yu. Beating the break- even point with a discrete-variable-encoded logical qubit. Nature, 616(7955):56–60, April 2023

    2023

  8. [8]

    Brock, Shraddha Singh, Alec Eickbusch, Volodymyr V

    Benjamin L. Brock, Shraddha Singh, Alec Eickbusch, Volodymyr V. Sivak, Andy Z. Ding, Luigi Frunzio, Steven M. Girvin, and Michel H. Devoret. Quantum error correction of qudits beyond break-even. Nature, 641(8063):612–618, May 2025

    2025

Show all 134 references
  1. [9]

    Quantum er- ror correction below the surface code threshold.Nature, pages 1–3, December 2024

    Google Quantum AI and Collaborators. Quantum er- ror correction below the surface code threshold.Nature, pages 1–3, December 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    Paetznick, M

    A. Paetznick, M. P. da Silva, C. Ryan-Anderson, J. M. Bello-Rivas, J. P. Campora III, A. Chernoguzov, J. M. Dreiling, C. Foltz, F. Frachon, J. P. Gaebler, T. M. Gatterman, L. Grans-Samuelsson, D. Gresh, D. Hayes, N. Hewitt, C. Holliman, C. V. Horst, J. Johansen, D. Lucchetti, ...

    2024

  3. [11]

    P.W. Shor. Fault-tolerant quantum computation. InPro- ceedings of 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 56–65, 1996

    1996

  4. [12]

    DiVincenzo and Peter W

    David P. DiVincenzo and Peter W. Shor. Fault-tolerant error correction with efficient quantum codes.Phys. Rev. Lett., 77:3260–3263, Oct 1996

    1996

  5. [13]

    A. Yu. Kitaev.Quantum Error Correction with Imperfect Gates, pages 181–188. Springer US, Boston, MA, 1997

    1997

  6. [14]

    Quantum computations: algorithms and error correction

    A Yu Kitaev. Quantum computations: algorithms and error correction. Russian Mathematical Surveys , 52(6):1191–1249, December 1997

    1997

  7. [15]

    Theory of fault-tolerant quantum computation

    Daniel Gottesman. Theory of fault-tolerant quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A , 57:127–137, Jan 1998

    1998

  8. [16]

    How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits

    Craig Gidney and Martin Ekerå. How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits. Quantum, 5:433, April 2021

  9. [17]

    S. B. Bravyi and A. Yu. Kitaev. Quantum codes on a lattice with boundary. ., 1998

    1998

  10. [18]

    Fowler, Matteo Mariantoni, John M

    Austin G. Fowler, Matteo Mariantoni, John M. Marti- nis, and Andrew N. Cleland. Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A, 86:032324, Sep 2012

    2012

  11. [19]

    Austin G. Fowler. Proof of finite surface code threshold for matching. Phys. Rev. Lett., 109:180502, Nov 2012

    2012

  12. [20]

    Yu Tomita and Krysta M. Svore. Low-distance sur- face codes under realistic quantum noise.Phys. Rev. A , 90:062320, Dec 2014

    2014

  13. [21]

    Repetition cat qubits for fault-tolerant quantum computation

    Jérémie Guillaud and Mazyar Mirrahimi. Repetition cat qubits for fault-tolerant quantum computation. Phys. Rev. X, 9:041053, Dec 2019

    2019

  14. [22]

    Gross, Alexan- der Grimm, Nicholas E

    Shruti Puri, Lucas St-Jean, Jonathan A. Gross, Alexan- der Grimm, Nicholas E. Frattini, Pavithran S. Iyer, Anirudh Krishna, Steven Touzard, Liang Jiang, Alexan- dre Blais, Steven T. Flammia, and S. M. Girvin. Bias- preserving gates with stabilized cat qubits.Science Ad- vances...

    2020

  15. [23]

    Darmawan, Benjamin J

    Andrew S. Darmawan, Benjamin J. Brown, Arne L. Grimsmo, David K. Tuckett, and Shruti Puri. Practical quantum error correction with the xzzx code and kerr-cat qubits. PRX Quantum, 2:030345, Sep 2021

    2021

  16. [24]

    Error rates and 18 resource overheads of repetition cat qubits

    Jérémie Guillaud and Mazyar Mirrahimi. Error rates and 18 resource overheads of repetition cat qubits. Phys. Rev. A, 103:042413, Apr 2021

    2021

  17. [25]

    Campbell, Connor T

    Christopher Chamberland, Kyungjoo Noh, Patricio Arrangoiz-Arriola, Earl T. Campbell, Connor T. Hann, Joseph Iverson, Harald Putterman, Thomas C. Bo- hdanowicz, Steven T. Flammia, Andrew Keller, Gil Re- fael, John Preskill, Liang Jiang, Amir H. Safavi-Naeini, Oskar Painter, and...

    2022

  18. [26]

    High- performance repetition cat code using fast noisy oper- ations

    Francois-Marie Le Régent, Camille Berdou, Zaki Legh- tas, Jérémie Guillaud, and Mazyar Mirrahimi. High- performance repetition cat code using fast noisy oper- ations. Quantum, 7:1198, December 2023

    2023

  19. [27]

    Hann, Kyungjoo Noh, Harald Putterman, Matthew H

    Connor T. Hann, Kyungjoo Noh, Harald Putterman, Matthew H. Matheny, Joseph K. Iverson, Michael T. Fang, ChristopherChamberland, OskarPainter, andFer- nando G. S. L. Brandão. Hybrid cat-transmon architec- ture for scalable, hardware-efficient quantum error cor- rection, 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    Ldpc-cat codes for low-overhead quantum computing in 2d, 2024

    Diego Ruiz, Jérémie Guillaud, Anthony Leverrier, Maz- yar Mirrahimi, and Christophe Vuillot. Ldpc-cat codes for low-overhead quantum computing in 2d, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Fault-tolerant quantum computing with the parity code and noise- biased qubits, 2024

    Anette Messinger, Valentin Torggler, Berend Klaver, Michael Fellner, and Wolfgang Lechner. Fault-tolerant quantum computing with the parity code and noise- biased qubits, 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    Fusion-based quantum computation

    Sara Bartolucci, Patrick Birchall, Hector Bombín, Hugo Cable, Chris Dawson, Mercedes Gimeno-Segovia, Eric Johnston, Konrad Kieling, Naomi Nickerson, Mihir Pant, Fernando Pastawski, Terry Rudolph, and Chris Sparrow. Fusion-based quantum computation. Nature Communi- cations, 14(...

    2023

  23. [32]

    Tailoring fusion-based error correction for high thresholds to bi- ased fusion failures

    Kaavya Sahay, Jahan Claes, and Shruti Puri. Tailoring fusion-based error correction for high thresholds to bi- ased fusion failures. Phys. Rev. Lett., 131:120604, 2023

    2023

  24. [33]

    Mishmash, Naomi Nickerson, Fernando Pastawski, and Sam Roberts

    Héctor Bombín, Chris Dawson, Ryan V. Mishmash, Naomi Nickerson, Fernando Pastawski, and Sam Roberts. Logical blocks for fault-tolerant topological quantum computation. PRX Quantum , 4:020303, Apr 2023

    2023

  25. [34]

    Ferguson, Vladimir E

    Guanyu Zhu, David G. Ferguson, Vladimir E. Manucharyan, and Jens Koch. Circuit qed with flux- onium qubits: Theory of the dispersive regime. Phys. Rev. B, 87:024510, Jan 2013

    2013

  26. [35]

    Girvin, and Robert J

    Gerhard Kirchmair, Brian Vlastakis, Zaki Leghtas, Si- mon E Nigg, Hanhee Paik, Eran Ginossar, Mazyar Mir- rahimi, Luigi Frunzio, Steven M. Girvin, and Robert J. Schoelkopf. Observation of quantum state collapse and revival due to the single-photon kerr effect. Nature, 495(7440...

    2013

  27. [36]

    Grimsmo, S

    Alexandre Blais, Arne L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and Andreas Wallraff. Circuit quantum electrodynamics.Re- views of Modern Physics , 93(2):025005, 2021

    2021

  28. [37]

    Fault-tolerant operation of bosonic qubits with discrete- variable ancillae

    Qian Xu, Pei Zeng, Daohong Xu, and Liang Jiang. Fault-tolerant operation of bosonic qubits with discrete- variable ancillae. Phys. Rev. X , 14:031016, Jul 2024

    2024

  29. [38]

    W. P. Grice. Arbitrarily complete bell-state measure- ment using only linear optical elements.Phys. Rev. A , 84:042331, Oct 2011

    2011

  30. [39]

    If no additional qubits are used, the resource state prepa- ration succeeds with probability 1/(26) ≈ 1.5%

  31. [40]

    Pop, Nicholas A

    Matthew Reagor, Hanhee Paik, Gianluigi Catelani, Luyan Sun, Christopher Axline, Eric Holland, Ioan M. Pop, Nicholas A. Masluk, Teresa Brecht, Luigi Frun- zio, Michel H. Devoret, Leonid Glazman, and Robert J. Schoelkopf. Reaching 10ms single photon lifetimes for su- perconducti...

    2013

  32. [41]

    Heeres, Nissim Ofek, Katrina Sliwa, Eric Holland, Chen Wang, Jacob Blumoff, Kevin Chou, Michael J

    Matthew Reagor, Wolfgang Pfaff, Christopher Axline, Reinier W. Heeres, Nissim Ofek, Katrina Sliwa, Eric Holland, Chen Wang, Jacob Blumoff, Kevin Chou, Michael J. Hatridge, Luigi Frunzio, Michel H. Devoret, Liang Jiang, and Robert J. Schoelkopf. Quantum mem- ory with millisecon...

    2016

  33. [42]

    Rosenblum, P

    S. Rosenblum, P. Reinhold, M. Mirrahimi, Liang Jiang, L.Frunzio, andR.J.Schoelkopf. Fault-tolerantdetection of a quantum error.Science, 361(6399):266–270, 2018

    2018

  34. [43]

    Schoelkopf

    Philip Reinhold, Serge Rosenblum, Wen Long Ma, Luigi Frunzio, Liang Jiang, and Robert J. Schoelkopf. Error- corrected gates on an encoded qubit. Nature Physics, 16(8):822–826, 2020

    2020

  35. [44]

    Oriani, Ravi K

    Srivatsan Chakram, Andrew E. Oriani, Ravi K. Naik, Akash V. Dixit, Kevin He, Ankur Agrawal, Hyeokshin Kwon, and David I. Schuster. Seamless high-q microwave cavities for multimode circuit quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett., 127:107701, Aug 2021

    2021

  36. [45]

    Joshi, Daniel Chausovsky, Nitzan Kahn, Engin Çiftyürek, Fabien Lafont, and Serge Rosenblum

    Ofir Milul, Barkay Guttel, Uri Goldblatt, Sergey Haz- anov, Lalit M. Joshi, Daniel Chausovsky, Nitzan Kahn, Engin Çiftyürek, Fabien Lafont, and Serge Rosenblum. Superconducting cavity qubit with tens of milliseconds single-photon coherence time.PRX Quantum, 4:030336, Sep 2023

    2023

  37. [46]

    Joshi, Daniel Chausovsky, Fa- bien Lafont, and Serge Rosenblum

    Uri Goldblatt, Nitzan Kahn, Sergey Hazanov, Ofir Milul, Barkay Guttel, Lalit M. Joshi, Daniel Chausovsky, Fa- bien Lafont, and Serge Rosenblum. Recovering quantum coherence of a cavity qubit coupled to a noisy ancilla through real-time feedback. Phys. Rev. X , 14:041056, Dec 2024

    2024

  38. [47]

    Romanenko, R

    A. Romanenko, R. Pilipenko, S. Zorzetti, D. Frolov, M. Awida, S. Belomestnykh, S. Posen, and A. Gras- sellino. Three-dimensional superconducting resonators at 20 mk with photon lifetimes up toτ = 2 s. Phys. Rev. Appl., 13:034032, Mar 2020

    2020

  39. [48]

    A. J. Sirois, M. A. Castellanos-Beltran, M. P. De- Feo, L. Ranzani, F. Lecocq, R. W. Simmonds, J. D. Teufel, and J. Aumentado. Coherent-state storage and retrieval between superconducting cavities using para- metric frequency conversion. Applied Physics Letters , 106(17):172603, 2015

    2015

  40. [49]

    Gao, Brian J

    Yvonne Y. Gao, Brian J. Lester, Yaxing Zhang, Chen Wang, Serge Rosenblum, Luigi Frunzio, Liang Jiang, 19 S. M. Girvin, and Robert J. Schoelkopf. Programmable interference between two microwave quantum memories. Physical Review X, 8(2):021073, 2018

    2018

  41. [50]

    Gao, Brian J

    Yvonne Y. Gao, Brian J. Lester, Kevin S. Chou, Luigi Frunzio, Michel H. Devoret, Liang Jiang, S. M. Girvin, and Robert J. Schoelkopf. Entanglement of bosonic modes through an engineered exchange interaction.Na- ture, 566(7745):509–512, 2019

    2019

  42. [51]

    Lester, Yvonne Y

    Yaxing Zhang, Brian J. Lester, Yvonne Y. Gao, Liang Jiang, R. J. Schoelkopf, and S. M. Girvin. Engineering bilinear mode coupling in circuit qed: Theory and exper- iment. Physical Review A, 99(1):012314, 2019

    2019

  43. [52]

    Chapman, Stijn J

    Benjamin J. Chapman, Stijn J. de Graaf, Sophia H. Xue, Yaxing Zhang, James Teoh, Jacob C. Cur- tis, Takahiro Tsunoda, Alec Eickbusch, Alexander P. Read, Akshay Koottandavida, Shantanu O. Mundhada, Luigi Frunzio, M.H. Devoret, S.M. Girvin, and R.J. Schoelkopf. High-On-Off-Ratio...

    2023

  44. [53]

    Yao Lu, Aniket Maiti, John W. O. Garmon, Suhas Ganjam, Yaxing Zhang, Jahan Claes, Luigi Frunzio, Steven M. Girvin, and Robert J. Schoelkopf. High- fidelity parametric beamsplitting with a parity-protected converter. Nature Communications, 14(1):5767, 2023

    2023

  45. [54]

    Chao Zhou, Pinlei Lu, Matthieu Praquin, Tzu-Chiao Chien, Ryan Kaufman, Xi Cao, Mingkang Xia, Roger S. K. Mong, Wolfgang Pfaff, David Pekker, and Michael Hatridge. Realizing all-to-all couplings among detach- able quantum modules using a microwave quantum state router. npj Quan...

    2023

  46. [56]

    Mundhada, A

    S.O. Mundhada, A. Grimm, J. Venkatraman, Z.K. Minev, S. Touzard, N.E. Frattini, V.V. Sivak, K. Sliwa, P. Reinhold, S. Shankar, M. Mirrahimi, and M.H. De- voret. Experimental implementation of a raman-assisted eight-wave mixing process.Phys. Rev. Appl. , 12:054051, Nov 2019

    2019

  47. [57]

    Grimsmo, Joshua Combes, and Ben Q

    Arne L. Grimsmo, Joshua Combes, and Ben Q. Bara- giola. Quantum computing with rotation-symmetric bosonic codes. Phys. Rev. X , 10:011058, Mar 2020

    2020

  48. [58]

    Clerk, and Liang Jiang

    Qian Xu, Guo Zheng, Yu-Xin Wang, Peter Zoller, Aashish A. Clerk, and Liang Jiang. Autonomous quan- tum error correction and fault-tolerant quantum compu- tation with squeezed cat qubits.npj Quantum Informa- tion, 9(1):1–11, August 2023

    2023

  49. [59]

    Smith, Eleanor Crane, John M

    Yuan Liu, Shraddha Singh, Kevin C. Smith, Eleanor Crane, John M. Martyn, Alec Eickbusch, Alexan- der Schuckert, Richard D. Li, Jasmine Sinanan-Singh, Micheline B. Soley, Takahiro Tsunoda, Isaac L. Chuang, Nathan Wiebe, and Steven M. Girvin. Hybrid oscillator- qubit quantum pro...

    2024

  50. [60]

    Dissipatingquartets of excitations in a superconducting circuit, 2025

    Aron Vanselow, Brieuc Beauseigneur, Louis Lattier, Marius Villiers, Anne Denis, Pascal Morfin, Zaki Legh- tas, andPhilippeCampagne-Ibarcq. Dissipatingquartets of excitations in a superconducting circuit, 2025

    2025

  51. [61]

    Alexandre Blais, Ren-Shou Huang, Andreas Wallraff, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf. Cavity quantum elec- trodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation.Physical Review A, 69(6):062320, 2004

    2004

  52. [62]

    Wallraff, D

    Alexandre Blais, Jay Gambetta, A. Wallraff, D. I. Schus- ter, S. M. Girvin, M. H. Devoret, and R. J. Schoelkopf. Quantum-information processing with circuit quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. A , 75:032329, Mar 2007

    2007

  53. [63]

    Schuster, Andrew A

    David I. Schuster, Andrew A. Houck, J A Schreier, Andreas Wallraff, Jay M. Gambetta, Alexandre Blais, Luigi Frunzio, J Majer, B Johnson, Michel H. Devoret, Steven M. Girvin, and Robert J. Schoelkopf. Resolving photon number states in a superconducting circuit.Na- ture, 445(712...

    2007

  54. [64]

    Albert, Sreraman Muralidharan, S

    Linshu Li, Chang Ling Zou, Victor V. Albert, Sreraman Muralidharan, S. M. Girvin, and Liang Jiang. Cat codes with optimal decoherence suppression for a lossy bosonic channel. Physical Review Letters, 119(3), 2017

    2017

  55. [65]

    Nigg, Luigi Frunzio, S

    Brian Vlastakis, Gerhard Kirchmair, Zaki Leghtas, Si- mon E. Nigg, Luigi Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, Mazyar Mir- rahimi, MichelH.Devoret, andRobertJ.Schoelkopf. De- terministically encoding quantum information using 100- photon Schrödinger cat states. Science, 342(6158):607– 610, 2013

    2013

  56. [66]

    L. Sun, A. Petrenko, Z. Leghtas, B. Vlastakis, G. Kirch- mair, K. M. Sliwa, A. Narla, M. Hatridge, S. Shankar, J. Blumoff, L. Frunzio, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret, and R. J. Schoelkopf. Tracking photon jumps with re- peated quantum non-demolition parity measurements. Nature, 5...

    2014

  57. [67]

    Michael, Matti Silveri, R

    Marios H. Michael, Matti Silveri, R. T. Brierley, Vic- tor V. Albert, Juha Salmilehto, Liang Jiang, and S. M. Girvin. New class of quantum error-correcting codes for a bosonic mode. Phys. Rev. X , 6:031006, Jul 2016

    2016

  58. [68]

    Steven M. Girvin. Introduction to quantum error correc- tion and fault tolerance.SciPost Physics Lecture Notes , 2023

    2023

  59. [69]

    Quantum capacity and codes for the bosonic loss- dephasing channel

    Peter Leviant, Qian Xu, Liang Jiang, and Serge Rosen- blum. Quantum capacity and codes for the bosonic loss- dephasing channel. Quantum, 6:821, 2022

    2022

  60. [70]

    Teoh, Patrick Winkel, Harshvardhan K

    James D. Teoh, Patrick Winkel, Harshvardhan K. Babla, Benjamin J. Chapman, Jahan Claes, Stijn J. de Graaf, John W.O. Garmon, William D. Kalfus, Yao Lu, Aniket Maiti, Kaavya Sahay, Neel Thakur, Takahiro Tsunoda, Sophia H. Xue, Luigi Frunzio, Steven M. Girvin, Shruti Puri, and R...

    2023

  61. [71]

    En- coding a qubit in an oscillator.Phys

    Daniel Gottesman, Alexei Kitaev, and John Preskill. En- coding a qubit in an oscillator.Phys. Rev. A, 64:012310, Jun 2001

    2001

  62. [72]

    Yu, Jay Gambetta, A

    Jens Koch, Terri M. Yu, Jay Gambetta, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, Alexandre Blais, M. H. Devoret, 20 S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf. Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the cooper pair box. Phys. Rev. A, 76:042319, Oct 2007

    2007

  63. [73]

    Albert, Luigi Frunzio, Liang Jiang, and Robert J

    Reinier W Heeres, Brian Vlastakis, Eric Holland, Ste- fan Krastanov, Victor V. Albert, Luigi Frunzio, Liang Jiang, and Robert J. Schoelkopf. Cavity state manipula- tion using photon-number selective phase gates.Physical Review Letters, 115(3), 2015

    2015

  64. [74]

    Axline, Luke D

    Wolfgang Pfaff, Christopher J. Axline, Luke D. Burkhart, Uri Vool, Philip Reinhold, Luigi Frun- zio, Liang Jiang, Michel H. Devoret, and Robert J. Schoelkopf. Controlled release of multiphoton quantum states from a microwave cavity memory.Nature Physics, 13(9):882–887, September 2017

    2017

  65. [75]

    Schuster, An- dreas Wallraff, Luigi Frunzio, J Majer, Michel H

    Jay Gambetta, Alexandre Blais, David I. Schuster, An- dreas Wallraff, Luigi Frunzio, J Majer, Michel H. De- voret, Steven M. Girvin, and Robert J. Schoelkopf. Qubit-photon interactions in a cavity: Measurement- induced dephasing and number splitting. Physical Re- view A, 74(04...

    2006

  66. [76]

    Johnson, M

    B.R. Johnson, M. D. Reed, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, Lev S. Bishop, E. Ginossar, J. M. Gambetta, L. DiCarlo, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf. Quantum non-demolition detection of single microwave photons in a circuit. Nature Physics, 6:663–667, 2010

    2010

  67. [77]

    These pulses can be further improved using optimal con- trol techniques [43, 78]

  68. [78]

    Heeres, Philip Reinhold, Nissim Ofek, Luigi Frunzio, Liang Jiang, Michel H

    Reinier W. Heeres, Philip Reinhold, Nissim Ofek, Luigi Frunzio, Liang Jiang, Michel H. Devoret, and Robert J. Schoelkopf. Implementing a universal gate set on a log- ical qubit encoded in an oscillator.Nature Communica- tions, 8(1):94, 2017

    2017

  69. [80]

    The one-way quantum computer–a non-network model of quantum computation

    Daniel Browne Robert Raussendorf and Hans Briegel. The one-way quantum computer–a non-network model of quantum computation. Journal of Modern Optics , 49(8):1299–1306, 2002

    2002

  70. [82]

    Raussendorf, J

    R. Raussendorf, J. Harrington, and K. Goyal. A fault- tolerant one-way quantum computer.Annals of Physics, 321(9):2242–2270, 2006

    2006

  71. [83]

    Pablo Bonilla Ataides, David K

    J. Pablo Bonilla Ataides, David K. Tuckett, Stephen D. Bartlett, Steven T. Flammia, and Benjamin J. Brown. The xzzx surface code. Nature Communications , 12(1):2172, April 2021

    2021

  72. [84]

    Thomp- son, and Shruti Puri

    Kaavya Sahay, Junlan Jin, Jahan Claes, Jeff D. Thomp- son, and Shruti Puri. High-threshold codes for neutral- atom qubits with biased erasure errors. Phys. Rev. X , 13:041013, Oct 2023

    2023

  73. [85]

    Deterministic generation of a four- component optical cat state

    Jacob Hastrup, Jonas Schou Neergaard-Nielsen, and Ul- rik Lund Andersen. Deterministic generation of a four- component optical cat state. Optics Letters, 45(3):640, 2020

    2020

  74. [86]

    Universal quantum computation with optical four-component cat qubits

    Daiqin Su, Ish Dhand, and Timothy C Ralph. Universal quantum computation with optical four-component cat qubits. PHYSICAL REVIEW A , 106:42614, 2022

    2022

  75. [87]

    All-optical cat-code quantum error correction.Physical Review Re- search, 4(4), 2022

    Jacob Hastrup and Ulrik Lund Andersen. All-optical cat-code quantum error correction.Physical Review Re- search, 4(4), 2022

    2022

  76. [88]

    Universal quantum computation with ideal clifford gates and noisy ancillas

    Sergey Bravyi and Alexei Kitaev. Universal quantum computation with ideal clifford gates and noisy ancillas. Phys. Rev. A , 71:022316, Feb 2005

    2005

  77. [89]

    Fowler, Ashley M

    Austin G. Fowler, Ashley M. Stephens, and Peter Groszkowski. High-threshold universal quantum compu- tation on the surface code.Phys. Rev. A, 80:052312, Nov 2009

    2009

  78. [90]

    Magic state distillation: not as costly as you think

    Daniel Litinski. Magic state distillation: not as costly as you think. Quantum, 3:205, December 2019

    2019

  79. [91]

    A magic state’s fidelity can be superior to the operations that created it.New Journal of Physics , 17(2):023037, feb 2015

    Ying Li. A magic state’s fidelity can be superior to the operations that created it.New Journal of Physics , 17(2):023037, feb 2015

    2015

  80. [92]

    Darmawan, Benjamin J

    Shraddha Singh, Andrew S. Darmawan, Benjamin J. Brown, and Shruti Puri. High-fidelity magic-state prepa- ration with a biased-noise architecture. Phys. Rev. A , 105:052410, May 2022

    2022

  81. [93]

    Shoham Jacoby, Yotam Vaknin, Alex Retzker, and Arne L. Grimsmo. Magic state injection with erasure qubits. 2025

    2025

  82. [94]

    Johansson, P.D

    J.R. Johansson, P.D. Nation, and Franco Nori. Qutip: An open-source python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems. Computer Physics Communica- tions, 183(8):1760–1772, 2012

    2012

  83. [95]

    Johansson, P.D

    J.R. Johansson, P.D. Nation, and Franco Nori. Qutip 2: A python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems. Computer Physics Communications , 184(4):1234–1240, 2013. 21 Appendix A: The four-legged cat code

    2013

  84. [96]

    As given in Eq

    The four-legged cat states For a displacement α, the orthonormal four-legged cat (4C) states {|Cα n ⟩ |n = 0 , 1, 2, 3} are defined as an equal superposition of four coherent states displaced along theq and p quadratures of a bosonic mode{|imα⟩ |m = 0, 1, 2, 3}. As given in Eq...

  85. [97]

    In general, these constructive/destructive interferences are imperfect, since the two logical states differ in their normalization factors

    Logical-X basis We may notice that the symmetric superposition of the logical states results in a constructive interference of the |±α⟩ states and a destructive interference of the|±iα⟩ states. In general, these constructive/destructive interferences are imperfect, since the t...

  86. [98]

    A5 gives the mean number of photons in each of the 4C states, as a function their “size”,|α|

    Mean photon number Eq. A5 gives the mean number of photons in each of the 4C states, as a function their “size”,|α|. ¯n0(α) ≡ ⟨Cα 0 | ˆa†ˆa |Cα 0 ⟩ = |α|2 sinh |α|2 − sin |α|2 cosh |α|2 + cos |α|2 (A5a) ¯n1(α) ≡ ⟨Cα 1 | ˆa†ˆa |Cα 1 ⟩ = |α|2 cosh |α|2 + cos |α|2 sinh |α|2 + sin...

  87. [99]

    Since cos |α|2 = 0, the logical-X states are exactly the two-legged cat states,|±L⟩ = Cα ±

    Choosing a cat size For our numerical simulations, weα = √ 2.5π ≈ 2.802. Since cos |α|2 = 0, the logical-X states are exactly the two-legged cat states,|±L⟩ = Cα ± . Furthermore, as we shall see in Appendix B,cos |α|2 = 0 also implies that the true beamsplitter output is exact...

  88. [100]

    Exact expressions for an even-even input Observe that choosing a cat size such thatcos |α|2 = 0 implies that the true beamsplitter output is exactly the expected output, shown in Table II. |Cα 0 ⟩ |Cα 0 ⟩ + |Cα 2 ⟩ |Cα 2 ⟩√ 2 BS − − → √ 2 cosh |α|2 p cosh(2|α|2) + cos(2|α|2) c...

  89. [101]

    The exact output states are given by Eq

    Exact expressions for an odd-odd input Evolving two odd cat states through a beamsplitter results in approximate states shown in Table III. The exact output states are given by Eq. B2. Similar to the X-basis condition for a single odd-cat, the exact beamsplitter 25 output coin...

  90. [102]

    Next, wemeasuretheparity operator, ˆΠ = exp −iπˆa†ˆa , using a PNM conditioned on the odd photon numbers, i.e., PNMgf ({1, 3,

    Preparing cat states Thecatstatepreparationbeginswithdisplacingthebosonicmodetoacoherentstate, |α⟩. Next, wemeasuretheparity operator, ˆΠ = exp −iπˆa†ˆa , using a PNM conditioned on the odd photon numbers, i.e., PNMgf ({1, 3, . . . ,2n + 1}) [5]. Let the parity measurement res...

  91. [103]

    11(a) illustrates the circuit used to approximately prepare the canonical Bell state,1√ 2 |+4C⟩⊗2 + |−4C⟩⊗2

    Bell-state preparation Fig. 11(a) illustrates the circuit used to approximately prepare the canonical Bell state,1√ 2 |+4C⟩⊗2 + |−4C⟩⊗2 . While this state is not directly used in our protocol, the circuit demonstrates three key principles underlying our approach. Firstly, we a...

  92. [104]

    CNOT gadget This section discusses the CNOT gadget shown in Fig. 11(b). This gadget implements a CNOT gate with a control qubit initialized in the|+4C⟩ state and a target qubit in an arbitrary 4C code state,|ψ4C⟩. The input |ψ4C⟩ must be initialized with twice the desired ener...

  93. [105]

    11(c), the CNOT gadget can be used to prepare a deformed Bell state

    Hadamard-deformed Bell-state preparation As illustrated in Fig. 11(c), the CNOT gadget can be used to prepare a deformed Bell state. This state differs from the canonical Bell state by the application of a Hadamard gate on one of the qubits, resulting in a state stabilized by ...

  94. [106]

    11(d) and (e) depict circuits that use Bell-state preparation and CNOT gadgets to create four-body GHZ states

    Preparing four-body GHZ states Figs. 11(d) and (e) depict circuits that use Bell-state preparation and CNOT gadgets to create four-body GHZ states. These examples highlight the importance of carefully managing the energy distribution among modes to ensure the final states have...

  95. [107]

    An alternative approach involves utilizing four- body resource states, commonly referred to as 4-star FBEC [30, 32]

    Resource states for 4-star FBEC In the main text, we examined FBEC using 6-ring resource states. An alternative approach involves utilizing four- body resource states, commonly referred to as 4-star FBEC [30, 32]. The 4-star protocol is conventionally less favored compared to ...

  96. [108]

    As shown in Fig

    Teleportation chain To introduce the foliation of a QEC code, we first examine the four qubit teleportation chain. As shown in Fig. 13, a single-qubit state is teleported back-and-forth between red and blue Bell states via Bell measurements (fusions). This setup is a symmetriz...

  97. [109]

    X-type” and depicted by s) or |0⟩ (denoted “X-type

    Quasi-planar foliation of the XZZX code Foliation is a well-established method for creating cluster states from stabilizer codes [9, 10, 81, 82]. Following foliation, each qubit in the resulting lattice may be “split” into two, as described in [11, 30, 32], to form the fusion-...

  98. [110]

    Planar FBEC v1.5

    Optimizing the number of qubits As explained in Sec. IIIA, certain qubits sometimes remain idle during the stabilizer cycle. These qubits neither store logical information nor participate in imminent operations for logical teleportation. Instead, they these qubits have recentl...

  99. [111]

    Here, ˆHχ describes static dispersive coupling between the bosonic mode and the ancilla, whileˆHd(t) represents a time-dependent drive on the ancilla

    Photon-Number Measurements (PNM) We model PNMs using a single mode coupled to a three-level ancilla, given by the HamiltonianˆH(t) = ˆHχ + ˆHd(t). Here, ˆHχ describes static dispersive coupling between the bosonic mode and the ancilla, whileˆHd(t) represents a time-dependent d...

  100. [112]

    Unlike the cZZ 4C, imposes no strict constraints on the amplitude |g|

    Beamsplitter The beamsplitter is described by the following Hamiltonian, ˆHBS = 1 2 h g(t)ˆa†ˆb + g∗(t)ˆaˆb† i + ∆ˆa†ˆa (H4) The BS(θ) gate requires ∆ = 0 , g = −i|g|, and T = θ/|g|. Unlike the cZZ 4C, imposes no strict constraints on the amplitude |g|. In experiment, high-fid...

  101. [113]

    4 (in the main text), we observe that the beamsplitter and transmon pulses do not overlap, allowing us to assume a piecewise evolution

    ZZ 4C( π 2 ) gate From Eq. 4 (in the main text), we observe that the beamsplitter and transmon pulses do not overlap, allowing us to assume a piecewise evolution. The entireZZ 4C( π 2 ) gate is simulated as a composition of quantum channels, ρf = [CT3 ◦ CBS2 ◦ CT2 ◦ CBS1 ◦ CT1...

  102. [114]

    Simulating this sequence concurrently for both modes is computationally expensive but unnecessary since the sequence is identical for each mode

    Fusion measurements As outlined in Appendix C, fusion measurements are implemented through an adaptive sequence of local PNMs. Simulating this sequence concurrently for both modes is computationally expensive but unnecessary since the sequence is identical for each mode. Inste...

  103. [115]

    These resulting fits are shown in Table V

    Fits to the numerical simulations The numerical results can be fit to low order polynomials, as shown by the dashed lines in Fig.7 and 16. These resulting fits are shown in Table V

  104. [116]

    Devoret, and Robert J

    Nissim Ofek, Andrei Petrenko, Reinier Heeres, Philip Reinhold, Zaki Leghtas, Brian Vlastakis, Yehan Liu, Luigi Frunzio, S M Girvin, L Jiang, Mazyar Mirrahimi, Michel H. Devoret, and Robert J. Schoelkopf. Extending the lifetime of a quantum bit with error correction in supercon...

    2016

  105. [117]

    Yao Lu, Aniket Maiti, John W. O. Garmon, Suhas Ganjam, Yaxing Zhang, Jahan Claes, Luigi Frunzio, Steven M. Girvin, and Robert J. Schoelkopf. High-fidelity parametric beamsplitting with a parity-protected converter. Nature Communications, 14(1):5767, 2023

    2023

  106. [118]

    Chapman, Stijn J

    Benjamin J. Chapman, Stijn J. de Graaf, Sophia H. Xue, Yaxing Zhang, James Teoh, Jacob C. Curtis, Takahiro Tsunoda, Alec Eickbusch, Alexander P. Read, Akshay Koottandavida, Shantanu O. Mundhada, Luigi Frunzio, M.H. Devoret, S.M. Girvin, and R.J. Schoelkopf. High-On-Off-Ratio B...

    2023

  107. [119]

    Fusion-based quantum computation

    Sara Bartolucci, Patrick Birchall, Hector Bombín, Hugo Cable, Chris Dawson, Mercedes Gimeno-Segovia, Eric Johnston, Konrad Kieling, Naomi Nickerson, Mihir Pant, Fernando Pastawski, Terry Rudolph, and Chris Sparrow. Fusion-based quantum computation. Nature Communications, 14(1)...

    2023

  108. [120]

    Tailoring fusion-based error correction for high thresholds to biased fusion failures

    Kaavya Sahay, Jahan Claes, and Shruti Puri. Tailoring fusion-based error correction for high thresholds to biased fusion failures. Phys. Rev. Lett., 131:120604, 2023

    2023

  109. [121]

    Nielsen and Isaac L

    Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang.Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition . Cambridge University Press, 2010

    2010

  110. [122]

    Browne, and Hans J

    Robert Raussendorf, Daniel E. Browne, and Hans J. Briegel. Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states. Phys. Rev. A , 68:022312, Aug 2003

    2003

  111. [123]

    Raussendorf, J

    R. Raussendorf, J. Harrington, and K. Goyal. A fault-tolerant one-way quantum computer.Annals of Physics, 321(9):2242– 2270, 2006. 39 Operation Varying ancilla T ge 1 = 2T ef 1 Varying ancillaT ee ϕ = 2T ef 1 Varying single-photon loss rate T loss 1 Six-ring prepara- tion pfai...

    2006

  112. [124]

    Brown and Sam Roberts

    Benjamin J. Brown and Sam Roberts. Universal fault-tolerant measurement-based quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Res., 2:033305, Aug 2020

    2020

  113. [125]

    A. Bolt, G. Duclos-Cianci, D. Poulin, and T. M. Stace. Foliated quantum error-correcting codes. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 117:070501, Aug 2016

    2016

  114. [126]

    Unifying flavors of fault tolerance with the ZX calculus.Quantum, 8:1379, June 2024

    Hector Bombin, Daniel Litinski, Naomi Nickerson, Fernando Pastawski, and Sam Roberts. Unifying flavors of fault tolerance with the ZX calculus.Quantum, 8:1379, June 2024

    2024

  115. [127]

    Eli Bourassa, and Shruti Puri

    Jahan Claes, J. Eli Bourassa, and Shruti Puri. Tailored cluster states with high threshold under biased noise.npj Quantum Information, 9(1):1–12, January 2023

    2023

  116. [128]

    Robert Raussendorf and Hans J. Briegel. A one-way quantum computer.Phys. Rev. Lett., 86:5188–5191, May 2001

    2001

  117. [129]

    Kuo and J.F

    F.F. Kuo and J.F. Kaiser.Systems analysis by digital computer . John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1966

    1966

  118. [130]

    Oliphant, Matt Haberland, Tyler Reddy, David Cournapeau, Evgeni Burovski, Pearu Peterson, Warren Weckesser, Jonathan Bright, Stéfan J

    Pauli Virtanen, Ralf Gommers, Travis E. Oliphant, Matt Haberland, Tyler Reddy, David Cournapeau, Evgeni Burovski, Pearu Peterson, Warren Weckesser, Jonathan Bright, Stéfan J. van der Walt, Matthew Brett, Joshua Wilson, K. Jar- rod Millman, Nikolay Mayorov, Andrew R. J. Nelson,...

    2020

  119. [131]

    Johansson, P.D

    J.R. Johansson, P.D. Nation, and Franco Nori. Qutip: An open-source python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems. Computer Physics Communications , 183(8):1760–1772, 2012

    2012

  120. [132]

    Johansson, P.D

    J.R. Johansson, P.D. Nation, and Franco Nori. Qutip 2: A python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems. Computer Physics Communications , 184(4):1234–1240, 2013

    2013

  121. [133]

    Teoh, William D

    Takahiro Tsunoda, James D. Teoh, William D. Kalfus, Stijn J. De Graaf, Benjamin J. Chapman, Jacob C. Curtis, Neel Thakur, Steven M. Girvin, and Robert J. Schoelkopf. Error-detectable bosonic entangling gates with a noisy ancilla.PRX Quantum, 4(2), 2023

    2023

  122. [134]

    Weiss, Shruti Puri, and S.M

    D.K. Weiss, Shruti Puri, and S.M. Girvin. Quantum random access memory architectures using 3d superconducting cavities. PRX Quantum, 5:020312, Apr 2024

    2024

  123. [135]

    A simple formula for the average gate fidelity of a quantum dynamical operation.Physics Letters A , 303(4):249–252, 2002

    Michael A Nielsen. A simple formula for the average gate fidelity of a quantum dynamical operation.Physics Letters A , 303(4):249–252, 2002

    2002

  124. [136]

    Efficient simulation of random quantum states and operators

    Christoph Dankert. Efficient simulation of random quantum states and operators. 2005

    2005

  125. [137]

    Fidelity of quantum operations.Physics Letters A , 367(1):47–51, 2007

    Line Hjortshøj Pedersen, Niels Martin Møller, and Klaus Mølmer. Fidelity of quantum operations.Physics Letters A , 367(1):47–51, 2007. 40

    2007

  126. [138]

    Mohseni, A

    M. Mohseni, A. T. Rezakhani, and D. A. Lidar. Quantum-process tomography: Resource analysis of different strategies. Phys. Rev. A , 77:032322, Mar 2008

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.