Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Implementing the RFT finite-volume formalism for three pions across all non-maximal isospins

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Three-pion finite-volume spectra are computed for all non-maximal isospins, with no three-particle interactions, as a baseline for lattice QCD.

desk verdict A useful, open-code implementation of the RFT quantization condition for three pions at isospin 0,1,2; the missing partial-wave convergence check is a real gap but not fatal for this honestly-caveated proceedings paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.05060 v1 pith:PPL67LRS submitted 2024-12-06 hep-lat

Athari Alotaibi , Maxwell T. Hansen This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-lat
keywords finite-volumespectrumthreepionsRFTquantizationconditionnon-maximalisospinlatticeQCDthree-particleinteractionsopen-sourceimplementationavoidedlevelcrossings
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a numerical implementation of the relativistic-field-theoretic (RFT) finite-volume quantization condition for three pions, extended to the non-maximal isospin channels $I_{\pi\pi\pi}=2,1,0$. In the limit of vanishing three-particle interactions, $K_{\mathrm{df},3}=0$, it produces discrete finite-volume energy spectra as functions of box size $L$ and total momentum $\boldsymbol{P}$, in several irreducible representations of the finite-volume symmetry group. The results show how the $\sigma$ and $\rho$ two-particle resonances shift and mix the non-interacting levels, including avoided crossings between $\rho\pi$- and $\sigma\pi$-like states. These benchmark spectra, computed with an open-source implementation, give lattice QCD a concrete target for future extractions of three-pion interactions.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the RFT quantization condition $\det\big[1+K_{\mathrm{df},3}\,F_3(E,\boldsymbol{P},L|K_2)\big]=0$, where $F_3$ packages all finite-volume effects from the two-particle subprocess through the kinematic functions $F$ and $G$ and the two-particle K-matrix $K_2$. For non-maximal isospin, every object in the condition carries an additional flavor index $f=1,\ldots,7$ labelling the neutral three-pion flavor states, and the determinant is block-diagonalized into four independent isospin quantization conditions. The numerical solution requires projecting to irreducible representations of the finite-volume symmetry group, truncating the partial-wave basis to $\ell_{\max}=1$ for $I_{\pi\pi}=1$ and $\ell_{\max}=0$ for $I_{\pi\pi}=0,2$, and parametrizing $K_2$ with Breit-Wigner forms for $\sigma$ and $\rho$ exchange plus a scattering length for $\pi\pi$.

What would settle it

Recompute the $I_{\pi\pi\pi}=1$ spectrum of Fig. 2(b) with $\ell_{\max}=2$ for the $\rho\pi$ subsystem (all other parameters fixed) and compare the energy levels $\mathcal{E}_n(L)$ over the plotted range $4\le m_\pi L \le 6$. If any level shifts by more than the typical spacing between adjacent levels at the avoided crossings, the $\ell_{\max}=1$ truncation is not converged and the published benchmark is not yet a reliable baseline.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the RFT quantization condition derived for all three-pion isospin channels in ref. [1] can be evaluated numerically for $I_{\pi\pi\pi}=2,1,0$ and yields a well-defined set of finite-volume energies $\mathcal{E}_n(\boldsymbol{P},L)$ when the three-particle K-matrix is set to zero. The paper demonstrates this by explicitly constructing the seven-dimensional neutral flavor basis, block-diagonalizing the quantization condition into the four isospin sectors, projecting onto the little-group irreps for $\boldsymbol{P}=[000],[001],[011]$, and solving the determinant condition in $E$ for fixed $L$. The spectra show characteristic features expected in a real lattice calculation: level shifts that grow with the $\rho$ coupling, avoided crossings between $\rho\pi$ and $\sigma\pi$ states in the $I=1$ sector, and a flattening of levels as the total momentum is increased. The unphysical-solution analysis shows that spurious levels appearing at small volumes are tied to subthreshold poles of the Breit-Wigner $K_2$ and can be removed by changing the cutoff function, at the price of power-like volume artifacts.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the partial-wave truncation ($\ell_{\max}=1$ for $I_{\pi\pi}=1$, $\ell_{\max}=0$ for $I_{\pi\pi}=0,2$) is accurate enough that the predicted levels are close to the full partial-wave result; the paper introduces this truncation without a convergence check, and if higher partial waves matter at the plotted energies and volumes, the benchmark spectra could shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The published $K_{\mathrm{df},3}=0$ spectra provide a direct baseline against which lattice QCD calculations of three-pion systems in the $I=2,1,0$ channels can be compared, isolating the effect of genuine three-body interactions.
  • Avoided crossings between $\rho\pi$- and $\sigma\pi$-like levels in the $I=1$ spectrum identify the kinematic regions where a future lattice calculation will be most sensitive to the $K_{\mathrm{df},3}$ parameters.
  • The open-source implementation makes the same spectra reproducible and easily extendable to nonzero $K_{\mathrm{df},3}$, e.g. with chiral-effective-theory parametrizations, enabling parameter extraction from lattice energies.
  • The demonstration of spurious solutions shows that the choice of cutoff function in $K_2$ must be treated as a systematic in any three-pion analysis, since changing it removes some small-volume artifacts but introduces power-like volume dependence.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural test of the benchmark's reliability would be a convergence study in the partial-wave truncation: recomputing the $I=1$ spectrum with $\ell_{\max}=2$ for the $\rho\pi$ subsystem. If any displayed level shifts noticeably, the $\ell_{\max}=1$ truncation is not converged at these volumes.
  • Because the paper's spectra are generated with $K_{\mathrm{df},3}=0$, they can be used as synthetic data to validate the fitting machinery (e.g. extraction of $K_{\mathrm{df},3}$ from finite-volume energies) before any costly lattice simulation, a use the authors do not explicitly pursue.
  • The cutoff-function sensitivity suggests that some small-volume levels in the published spectra are artifacts of the particular Breit-Wigner $K_2$ form, not generic predictions; lattice checks at larger volumes would be needed to tell which levels persist.
  • The same flavor-basis block-diagonalization could be applied to other three-body systems with non-degenerate constituents (such as $\pi K$ systems), where the nontrivial flavor structure is even richer.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an implementation of the RFT finite-volume quantization condition of ref. [1] for three-pion spectra in all non-maximal isospin channels Iπππ = 2, 1, 0, with the three-particle K-matrix set to zero. After reviewing the formalism, the authors describe the ampyL implementation (flavor projection, symmetry-group projection, and partial-wave truncation) and present interacting and non-interacting energy levels for rest and moving frames, using Breit-Wigner σ/ρ and scattering-length ππ parameterizations of K2. The paper also contains an exploratory study of unphysical solutions associated with subthreshold behavior and with the cutoff function. The main claimed deliverable is a baseline spectrum for future lattice QCD calculations that aim to extract three-pion interactions.

Significance. The paper is a clearly written and useful milestone: it is the first numerical implementation of the all-isospin RFT quantization condition, it makes the implementation available as open-source code, and its Kdf,3 = 0 spectra are a natural reference point for future analyses. I see no circularity in the reliance on ref. [1]; the numerical results are genuine predictions. The main caveat is that the reliability of the benchmark depends on the convergence of the partial-wave truncation and on checks against known limits, neither of which is currently documented.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4(iv), Figs. 2-3] The benchmark claim in Sec. 7 rests on the partial-wave truncation introduced in Sec. 4(iv): ℓmax = 1 for Iππ = 1 and ℓmax = 0 for Iππ = 0, 2, but no convergence test is given. The text itself notes that partial-wave mixing increases as the finite-volume symmetry is reduced, and at mπgρ = 6 the ρ Breit-Wigner is broad, so ℓ = 2 contributions in the Iππ = 1 subchannel need not be negligible. A missing ℓ = 2 block can create near-degeneracies and change which level crossings are avoided, which is exactly the phenomenon highlighted in Fig. 2(b). I request at least one convergence check (for example, repeating Fig. 2(b) at mπgρ = 6 with ℓmax = 2 or 3) and a quantitative statement of the truncation error on the plotted levels.
  2. [Secs. 3-5] The new implementation is not validated against any previously published spectrum. The maximal-isospin sector Iπππ = 3 is a special case of the same flavor-projected quantization condition and has been studied extensively (refs. [49-54]); a comparison of the ampyL output in that limit (with the same K2 and Kdf,3 = 0) against a published result, or against a known implementation such as refs. [35,51], would test the flavor-index bookkeeping and the F3/G/K2 algebra. Without such a check, the only tests presented are comparisons with the non-interacting energies generated by the same code, which do not exercise the nontrivial F3/K2 blocks.
  3. [Sec. 6, Fig. 4] The unphysical-solution study demonstrates that the spectrum can depend qualitatively on the cutoff function J(z): in the lower rows of Fig. 4 the spurious states disappear, while the text states that power-like volume effects are introduced. Since all benchmark spectra in Figs. 2-3 use the single cutoff function of ref. [22], the cutoff dependence of those levels is unquantified. The paper should either show that the displayed levels are stable over an acceptable family of cutoff functions in the energy range considered, or report the observed sensitivity as an uncertainty attached to the benchmark.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Eqs. (5)-(6)] The variable E is used both for the total three-pion energy (as in eq. (1)) and for the subchannel CMF energy in the phase-shift parameterizations; using E*_{2,k} as defined in eq. (3) in the phase-shift formulas would remove this ambiguity.
  2. [Fig. 4] The caption and the text describe the layout of the cutoff-function panels differently (the caption says the cutoff functions are shown in the left panel, while the text refers to the top right panel); please clarify the panel structure.
  3. [Ref. [60]] The git repository is cited without a version or commit identifier; for reproducibility, please cite the specific release used to produce the results.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper implements a prior, independently derived quantization condition and computes spectra for chosen K-matrix parameters.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is the numerical implementation of the RFT quantization condition, eq. (1), as derived in ref. [1] (Hansen, Romero-López, Sharpe), and the computation of finite-volume spectra for I=2,1,0 with Kdf,3=0. The quantization condition and isospin decomposition are taken from prior published work; although one author of the present paper is also an author of ref. [1], the derivation is independent, parameter-free, and does not use the spectra computed here as input. The two- and three-particle K-matrices are chosen model inputs (eqs. (5)-(6)), not fitted to the target spectra, and the paper explicitly states that the parameters are illustrative rather than realistic. Thus the spectra are genuine outputs of the formalism for fixed inputs, not predictions that reduce by construction to their inputs. The partial-wave truncation in Section 4(iv) is a numerical approximation that could affect accuracy, but that is a correctness concern, not circularity. No step in the paper defines a quantity in terms of the result it is meant to predict, and no load-bearing argument reduces to a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the prior RFT quantization condition and on a set of illustrative K2 parametrizations. No new particles, forces, or entities are introduced. The main free choices are the K-matrix parameters and the partial-wave truncation, all stated explicitly.

free parameters (5)
  • mσ/mπ = 1.8
    Chosen by hand for illustration; no lattice or experimental input.
  • mρ/mπ = 2.2
    Chosen by hand; the rho resonance mass in the K2 parametrization.
  • mπ gσ = 1.0
    Coupling of the sigma channel, chosen for illustration.
  • mπ aππ = 0.1
    Scattering length for the Iππ=2 channel, chosen for illustration.
  • mπ gρ = 1, 3, 6 in figs. 2-3; 5-8 in fig. 4
    Rho coupling varied to show the dependence of the spectra on interaction strength.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The RFT quantization condition, eq. (1), with F3 defined in eq. (2), is correct up to exponentially suppressed corrections e^(-mπ L).
    Taken from refs [1,22]; the paper implements this formula without re-deriving it.
  • ad hoc to paper The two-particle K-matrix K2 is parametrized by the Breit-Wigner and scattering-length forms in eqs. (5)-(6).
    The authors state these are illustrative, not realistic, parametrizations.
  • ad hoc to paper Partial-wave truncation at ℓmax=1 for Iππ=1 and ℓmax=0 for Iππ=0,2 is sufficient for the shown energies and volumes.
    Introduced in Section 4(iv) with no convergence check; the paper notes mixing increases for reduced symmetry.
  • domain assumption Exponentially suppressed finite-volume effects e^(-mπ L) are negligible at the volumes used.
    Standard in the RFT formalism, but the smallest shown volume is mπ L=3.0, where such corrections may be non-negligible; the unphysical-solution discussion raises exactly this concern.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Implementing the RFT finite-volume formalism for three pions across all non-maximal isospins." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PPL67LRS

@misc{pith2026241205060,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Implementing the RFT finite-volume formalism for three pions across all non-maximal isospins},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PPL67LRS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.05060}
}
abstract

We present a numerical investigation of the relativistic-field-theoretic (RFT) formalism, used to predict the discrete energy spectrum of three pions in a finite volume. Applying the previously derived generalization, we extract results for all non-maximal isospin values ($I_{\pi\pi\pi} = 2,1,$ and $0$), for different total momenta $\boldsymbol{P}$, and for various irreducible representations of the finite-volume symmetry group. We restrict attention to the unphysical scenario in which the three-particle interactions are set to zero. This set-up thus serves as a baseline for future lattice QCD calculations that will aim to extract such three-body interactions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.05060 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. As is described in detail in various references, e.g. refs. [1, 22, 59], the quantization condition is derived via a skeleton expansion in which all three-particle states are exposed. In the example shown, one can identify the scattering pair as those lines connected to a circle with four legs and spectator as the third particle. This changes at various locations in the diagram. The vertical lines correspond to the … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The interacting finite volume energies (solid orange lines) of irrep 𝐴 − 1 in isospin channel: (a) 𝐼𝜋 𝜋 𝜋 = 2, (b) 𝐼𝜋 𝜋 𝜋 = 1 and (c) 𝐼𝜋 𝜋 𝜋 = 0. The non-interacting energies are illustrated in black solid, dashed and dotted lines for 𝜋𝜋𝜋, 𝜌𝜋 and 𝜎𝜋 states, respectively. The small black numbers give the multiplicity of non-interacting states in the cases where this is greater than one. The three panels in each subpl… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The 𝐴1 energy spectrum in 𝐼𝜋 𝜋 𝜋 = 2 for moving frames with total momentum; (a) 𝑷 = [001], and (b) 𝑷 = [011]. Other features of the plots and other parameter choices are as in figure 2. 6. Unphysical solutions Another result of our numerical investigations is the appearance of unphysical solutions in certain cases. These are manifestly unphysical because they exist only over a finite range of volumes and then disapp… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The finite-volume energies of 𝐴2 irrep in isospin channel 𝐼𝜋 𝜋 𝜋 = 2 and 𝑷 = (2𝜋/𝐿) [001] frame. The spectrum is extracted with increasing 𝑔𝜌 coupling, shown in the top panel, and using three cutoff functions, shown in the left panel. 7. Summary and outlook In this tal…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From scattering towards multi-hadron weak decays

    hep-lat 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A review of current lattice QCD scattering calculations shows that finite-volume formalisms now enable multi-hadron weak decay studies with direct relevance to flavour physics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Hansen, F

    M.T. Hansen, F. Romero-López and S.R. Sharpe,Generalizing the relativistic quantization condition to include all three-pion isospin channels, JHEP 07(2020) 047 [2003.10974]

    arXiv 2020

  2. [22]

    Hansen and S.R

    M.T. Hansen and S.R. Sharpe,Relativistic, model-independent, three-particle quantization condition,Phys. Rev.D90(2014) 116003 [1408.5933]

    arXiv 2014

  3. [2]

    Lüscher,Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories

    M. Lüscher,Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories. 1. Stable Particle States,Commun.Math.Phys. 104 (1986) 177

    work page 1986

  4. [3]

    Lüscher,Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories

    M. Lüscher,Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories. 2. Scattering States,Commun.Math.Phys. 105 (1986) 153

    work page 1986

  5. [4]

    Rummukainen and S.A

    K. Rummukainen and S.A. Gottlieb,Resonance scattering phase shifts on a nonrest frame lattice,Nucl. Phys.B450(1995) 397 [hep-lat/9503028]

    arXiv 1995

  6. [5]

    Kim, C.T

    C.h. Kim, C.T. Sachrajda and S.R. Sharpe,Finite-volume effects for two-hadron states in moving frames, Nucl. Phys.B727(2005) 218 [hep-lat/0507006]

    arXiv 2005

  7. [6]

    Christ, C

    N.H. Christ, C. Kim and T. Yamazaki,Finite volume corrections to the two-particle decay of states with non-zero momentum, Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 114506 [hep-lat/0507009]

    arXiv 2005

  8. [7]

    Lage, U.-G

    M. Lage, U.-G. Meiner and A. Rusetsky,A Method to measure the antikaon-nucleon scattering length in lattice QCD, Phys. Lett.B681(2009) 439 [0905.0069]

    arXiv 2009

Show all 61 references
  1. [8]

    Bernard, M

    V. Bernard, M. Lage, U.G. Meiner and A. Rusetsky,Scalar mesons in a finite volume, JHEP 01 (2011) 019 [1010.6018]

    2011 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Fu,Rummukainen-Gottlieb’s formula on two-particle system with different mass, Phys.Rev

    Z. Fu,Rummukainen-Gottlieb’s formula on two-particle system with different mass, Phys.Rev. D85(2012) 014506 [1110.0319]

    2012 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Doring, U.-G

    M. Doring, U.-G. Meiner, E. Oset and A. Rusetsky,Unitarized Chiral Perturbation Theory in a finite volume: Scalar meson sector, Eur.Phys.J. A47(2011) 139 [1107.3988]. 8 Implementing the RFT formalism for non-maximal isospin𝜋𝜋𝜋 Athari Alotaibi

    2011 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Hansen and S.R

    M.T. Hansen and S.R. Sharpe,Multiple-channel generalization of Lellouch-Lüscher formula, Phys.Rev. D86(2012) 016007 [1204.0826]

    2012 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Briceño and Z

    R.A. Briceño and Z. Davoudi,Moving multichannel systems in a finite volume with application to proton-proton fusion, Phys. Rev.D88 (2013) 094507 [1204.1110]

    2013 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Gockeler, R

    M. Gockeler, R. Horsley, M. Lage, U.-G. Meißner, P. Rakow, A. Rusetsky et al.,Scattering phases for meson and baryon resonances on general moving-frame lattices, Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 094513 [1206.4141]

    2012 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Briceño,Two-particle multichannel systems in a finite volume with arbitrary spin,Phys

    R.A. Briceño,Two-particle multichannel systems in a finite volume with arbitrary spin,Phys. Rev. D89 (2014) 074507 [1401.3312]

    2014 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Briceño, J.J

    R.A. Briceño, J.J. Dudek and R.D. Young,Scattering processes and resonances from lattice QCD, Rev. Mod. Phys.90 (2018) 025001 [1706.06223]

    2018 arXiv

  9. [16]

    M. Mai, M. Döring and A. Rusetsky,Multi-particle systems on the lattice and chiral extrapolations: a brief review, Eur. Phys. J. ST230 (2021) 1623 [2103.00577]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Hanlon,Hadron spectroscopy and few-body dynamics from Lattice QCD,PoS LATTICE2023(2024) 106 [2402.05185]

    A.D. Hanlon,Hadron spectroscopy and few-body dynamics from Lattice QCD,PoS LATTICE2023(2024) 106 [2402.05185]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Detmold and M.J

    W. Detmold and M.J. Savage,The Energy of𝑛 Identical Bosons in a Finite Volume at 𝑂(𝐿−7),Phys. Rev.D77 (2008) 057502 [0801.0763]

    2008 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Beane, W

    S.R. Beane, W. Detmold and M.J. Savage,n-Boson Energies at Finite Volume and Three-Boson Interactions, Phys. Rev.D76(2007) 074507 [0707.1670]

    2007 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Briceño and Z

    R.A. Briceño and Z. Davoudi,Three-particle scattering amplitudes from a finite volume formalism,Phys. Rev.D87(2013) 094507 [1212.3398]

    2013 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Polejaeva and A

    K. Polejaeva and A. Rusetsky,Three particles in a finite volume,Eur. Phys. J. A48(2012) 67 [1203.1241]

    2012 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Hansen and S.R

    M.T. Hansen and S.R. Sharpe,Expressing the three-particle finite-volume spectrum in terms of the three-to-three scattering amplitude, Phys. Rev.D92 (2015) 114509 [1504.04248]

    2015 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Briceño, M.T

    R.A. Briceño, M.T. Hansen and S.R. Sharpe,Relating the finite-volume spectrum and the two-and-three-particle𝑆 matrix for relativistic systems of identical scalar particles,Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 074510 [1701.07465]

    2017 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Hammer, J.-Y

    H.-W. Hammer, J.-Y. Pang and A. Rusetsky,Three-particle quantization condition in a finite volume: 1. The role of the three-particle force, JHEP 09(2017) 109 [1706.07700]

    2017 arXiv

  18. [26]

    König and D

    S. König and D. Lee,Volume Dependence of N-Body Bound States,Phys. Lett. B779 (2018) 9 [1701.00279]. 9 Implementing the RFT formalism for non-maximal isospin𝜋𝜋𝜋 Athari Alotaibi

    2018 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Hammer, J.Y

    H.W. Hammer, J.Y. Pang and A. Rusetsky,Three particle quantization condition in a finite volume: 2. General formalism and the analysis of data, JHEP 10(2017) 115 [1707.02176]

    2017 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Mai and M

    M. Mai and M. Döring,Three-body Unitarity in the Finite Volume,Eur. Phys. J.A53 (2017) 240 [1709.08222]

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Briceño, M.T

    R.A. Briceño, M.T. Hansen and S.R. Sharpe,Numerical study of the relativistic three-body quantization condition in the isotropic approximation,Phys. Rev.D98 (2018) 014506 [1803.04169]

    2018 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Briceño, M.T

    R.A. Briceño, M.T. Hansen and S.R. Sharpe,Three-particle systems with resonant subprocesses in a finite volume,Phys. Rev.D99 (2019) 014516 [1810.01429]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Blanton, F

    T.D. Blanton, F. Romero-López and S.R. Sharpe,Implementing the three-particle quantization condition including higher partial waves, JHEP 03(2019) 106 [1901.07095]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Pang, J.-J

    J.-Y. Pang, J.-J. Wu, H.W. Hammer, U.-G. Meiner and A. Rusetsky,Energy shift of the three-particle system in a finite volume,Phys. Rev.D99 (2019) 074513 [1902.01111]

    2019 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Jackura, S.M

    A.W. Jackura, S.M. Dawid, C. Fernández-Ramírez, V. Mathieu, M. Mikhasenko, A. Pilloni et al.,Equivalence of three-particle scattering formalisms, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 034508 [1905.12007]

    2019 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Briceño, M.T

    R.A. Briceño, M.T. Hansen, S.R. Sharpe and A.P. Szczepaniak,Unitarity of the infinite-volume three-particle scattering amplitude arising from a finite-volume formalism, Phys. Rev.D100(2019) 054508 [1905.11188]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Romero-López, S.R

    F. Romero-López, S.R. Sharpe, T.D. Blanton, R.A. Briceño and M.T. Hansen,Numerical exploration of three relativistic particles in a finite volume including two-particle resonances and bound states, JHEP 10(2019) 007 [1908.02411]

    2019 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Blanton and S.R

    T.D. Blanton and S.R. Sharpe,Alternative derivation of the relativistic three-particle quantization condition,Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 054520 [2007.16188]

    2020 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Blanton and S.R

    T.D. Blanton and S.R. Sharpe,Equivalence of relativistic three-particle quantization conditions, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 054515 [2007.16190]

    2020 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Pang, J.-J

    J.-Y. Pang, J.-J. Wu and L.-S. Geng,𝐷𝐷𝐾 system in finite volume,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 114515 [2008.13014]

    2020 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Romero-López, A

    F. Romero-López, A. Rusetsky, N. Schlage and C. Urbach,Relativistic𝑁-particle energy shift in finite volume,JHEP 02 (2021) 060 [2010.11715]

    2021 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Blanton and S.R

    T.D. Blanton and S.R. Sharpe,Relativistic three-particle quantization condition for nondegenerate scalars, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 054503 [2011.05520]

    2021 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Müller, A

    F. Müller, A. Rusetsky and T. Yu,Finite-volume energy shift of the three-pion ground state, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 054506 [2011.14178]. 10 Implementing the RFT formalism for non-maximal isospin𝜋𝜋𝜋 Athari Alotaibi

    2021

  34. [42]

    Blanton and S.R

    T.D. Blanton and S.R. Sharpe,Three-particle finite-volume formalism for𝜋+𝜋+𝐾+ and related systems, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 034509 [2105.12094]

    2021 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Müller, J.-Y

    F. Müller, J.-Y. Pang, A. Rusetsky and J.-J. Wu,Relativistic-invariant formulation of the three-particle quantization condition, 2110.09351

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Blanton, F

    T.D. Blanton, F. Romero-López and S.R. Sharpe,Implementing the three-particle quantization condition for𝜋+𝜋+K+ and related systems,JHEP 02(2022) 098 [2111.12734]

    2022 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Jackura,Three-body scattering and quantization conditions from𝑆 matrix unitarity, 2208.10587

    A.W. Jackura,Three-body scattering and quantization conditions from𝑆 matrix unitarity, 2208.10587

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Hansen, F

    M.T. Hansen, F. Romero-López and S.R. Sharpe,Incorporating DD𝜋 effects and left-hand cuts in lattice QCD studies of the T𝑐𝑐(3875)+,JHEP 06 (2024) 051 [2401.06609]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    H. Yan, M. Garofalo, M. Mai, U.-G. Meißner and C. Urbach,The𝜔-meson from lattice QCD, 2407.16659

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    Schaaf and S.R

    W. Schaaf and S.R. Sharpe,Implementation of the three-neutron quantization condition, in 41st International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, 10, 2024 [2410.14037]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Mai and M

    M. Mai and M. Döring,Finite-Volume Spectrum of𝜋+𝜋+ and𝜋+𝜋+𝜋+ Systems,Phys. Rev. Lett. 122(2019) 062503 [1807.04746]

    2019 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Hörz and A

    B. Hörz and A. Hanlon,Two- and three-pion finite-volume spectra at maximal isospin from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (2019) 142002 [1905.04277]

    2019 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Blanton, F

    T.D. Blanton, F. Romero-López and S.R. Sharpe,𝐼 = 3 three-pion scattering amplitude from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.124 (2020) 032001 [1909.02973]

    2020 arXiv

  44. [52]

    M. Mai, M. Döring, C. Culver and A. Alexandru,Three-body unitarity versus finite-volume 𝜋+𝜋+𝜋+ spectrum from lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) 054510 [1909.05749]

    2020 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Fischer, B

    M. Fischer, B. Kostrzewa, L. Liu, F. Romero-López, M. Ueding and C. Urbach,Scattering of two and three physical pions at maximal isospin from lattice QCD,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 436 [2008.03035]

    2021 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Hadron Spectrumcollaboration,Energy-Dependent𝜋+𝜋+𝜋+ Scattering Amplitude from QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021) 012001 [2009.04931]

    2021 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Jackura, R.A

    A.W. Jackura, R.A. Briceño, S.M. Dawid, M.H.E. Islam and C. McCarty,Solving relativistic three-body integral equations in the presence of bound states, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 014507 [2010.09820]

    2021 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Dawid, M.H.E

    S.M. Dawid, M.H.E. Islam, R.A. Briceno and A.W. Jackura,Evolution of Efimov states, Phys. Rev. A109 (2024) 043325 [2309.01732]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Jackura and R.A

    A.W. Jackura and R.A. Briceño,Partial-wave projection of the one-particle exchange in three-body scattering amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 096030 [2312.00625]. 11 Implementing the RFT formalism for non-maximal isospin𝜋𝜋𝜋 Athari Alotaibi

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Briceño, C.S.R

    R.A. Briceño, C.S.R. Costa and A.W. Jackura,Partial-wave projection of relativistic three-body amplitudes, 2409.15577

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    Hansen and S.R

    M.T. Hansen and S.R. Sharpe,Lattice QCD and Three-particle Decays of Resonances,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.69(2019) 65 [1901.00483]

    2019 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Hansen,ampyL, 2022

    M.T. Hansen,ampyL, 2022. https://github.com/mthansen/ampyl

    2022

  53. [61]

    Baeza-Ballesteros, J

    J. Baeza-Ballesteros, J. Bijnens, T. Husek, F. Romero-López, S.R. Sharpe and M. Sjö,The three-pion K-matrix at NLO in ChPT, JHEP 03(2024) 048 [2401.14293]. 12

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.