Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

B->eta(') Form Factors in QCD

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0706.3628 v2 pith:PWPLEOQW submitted 2007-06-25 hep-ph

B->eta(') Form Factors in QCD

classification hep-ph
keywords contributionfactorsformsingletlcsrsaccuracyannihilationanomaly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We calculate the semileptonic form factors $f_+^{B\to \eta}(q^2)$ and $f_+^{B\to \eta'}(q^2)$ from QCD sum rules on the light-cone (LCSRs), to NLO in QCD, and for small to moderate q^2, $0\leq q^2\leq 16 {\rm GeV}^2$. We include in particular the so-called singlet contribution, i.e.\ weak annihilation of the B meson with the emission of two gluons which, thanks to the U(1)$_{\rm A}$ anomaly, couple directly to $\etap$. This effect is included to leading-twist accuracy. This contribution has been neglected in previous calculations of the form factors from LCSRs. We find that the singlet contribution to $f_+^{B\to \eta'}$ can be up to 20%, while that to $f_+^{B\to \eta}$ is, as expected, much smaller and below 3%. We also suggest to measure the ratio ${\cal B}(B\to\eta' e \nu)/{\cal B}(B\to \eta e \nu)$ to better constrain the size of the singlet contribution.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Radiative decays $J/\psi,\,\psi(2S)\rightarrow\gamma\eta^{(\prime)}$ in perturbative QCD with relativistic corrections

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Order-q² relativistic corrections in pQCD roughly double J/ψ→γη(') rates and favor a smaller mixing angle, while ψ(2S) rates overshoot data and may require coherent ηc mixing.