Emergent scalar field dynamics in a cosmological spacetime from GFT quantum gravity

Daniele Oriti; Federico Greco; Roukaya Dekhil; Stefano Liberati

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 52 references

Emergent scalar field dynamics in a cosmological spacetime from GFT quantum gravity

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A group field theory condensate yields a scalar matter field whose early-universe perturbations have a modified dispersion relation with dissipative and dispersive corrections.

desk verdict The genuinely new result is the coupled-regime perturbative wave equation and its k-dependent dissipative dispersion relation, but that headline is anchored to an unquantified locality approximation that suppresses the very terms it predicts. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12003 v1 pith:Q3IHNNBX submitted 2026-08-12 gr-qc hep-th

Roukaya Dekhil , Federico Greco , Stefano Liberati , Daniele Oriti This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qchep-th

keywords groupfieldtheoryquantumgravitycondensatecosmologyrelationalobservablesscalarperturbationsmodifieddispersionrelationcosmologicalbounceemergentspacetime

topics Quantum Gravity

open problems Quantum Gravity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that ordinary matter, specifically a massless scalar field, can be derived from the same quantum-geometric condensate that produces the emergent cosmological spacetime in group field theory (GFT), rather than being put in by hand. The homogeneous part of the scalar field obeys a modified equation of motion that reduces to the standard massless behavior in the late-time FLRW limit and retains corrections near the nonsingular bounce. For inhomogeneous perturbations, the paper derives an effective wave equation whose coefficients are fixed by the condensate background, and in the coupled density-phase regime this equation carries higher spatial derivative and mixed derivative terms. These produce a modified dispersion relation with a wavenumber-dependent imaginary part, which the authors read as genuinely dissipative, plus dispersive corrections. If correct, this gives a concrete route from a fundamental quantum-gravity formalism to potentially observable signatures in early-universe matter propagation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the condensate wave function $\tilde\sigma_j(\psi_0)$ written in a density-phase (Madelung) decomposition $\rho_j e^{i\theta_j}$, with $\psi_0=(x^\mu,\pi_\phi)$ fixing a relational frame. The scalar field expectation is read off as $\phi_0\simeq\rho_0^2\,\partial_{\pi_\phi}\theta_0$; differentiating the phase equation of motion with respect to $\pi_\phi$ and using $\partial_{\pi_\phi}\theta_0=\phi_0/\rho_0^2$ converts condensate hydrodynamics into a scalar-field equation. For perturbations, the same inversion is applied to $\delta\phi=2\rho_0\,\delta\rho\,\partial_{\pi_\phi}\theta_0+\rho_0^2\,\partial_{\pi_\phi}\delta\theta$, and the inverse operator $Q=(\tilde{\square}-\eta)^{-1}$ is approximated by a multiplicative constant $qI$ in the early-time regime. This last step is what turns the coupled perturbation equations into the local wave equation (28) and the dispersion relation (32).

What would settle it

Evaluate the exact action of $(\tilde{\square}-\eta)^{-1}$ on a Fourier mode of the perturbation equation on a representative bouncing background, and compare the resulting nonlocal mode equation with Eq. (28); if the nonlocal corrections are not small compared with the $\nabla^4$ term, the dispersion relation (32) is not the prediction of the theory.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a massless scalar field, complete with its homogeneous dynamics and its inhomogeneous perturbations, emerges from the same GFT condensate that gives rise to the cosmological spacetime, without assuming a background metric for the matter. The homogeneous field is reconstructed from the condensate phase via $\phi_0\simeq\rho_0^2\,\partial_{\pi_\phi}\theta_0$ and satisfies Eq. (12), a modified wave equation that reduces to $\ddot\phi_0=0$ at late times when the condensate geometry becomes FLRW, while keeping corrections near the bounce. For perturbations, after inverting the relation between $\delta\phi$ and the density/phase perturbations, the paper obtains the local wave equation (28) with coefficients fixed by the background condensate. In the coupled density-phase regime this equation contains $\nabla^2\delta\dot\phi$ and $\nabla^4\delta\phi$ terms, which yield the dispersion relation $\Omega_k=(i/2)\Gamma_k\pm\sqrt{\Gamma_k^2+4[k^4f_4-k^2f_3+f_5]}$ with $\Gamma_k=k^2f_2-f_1$. The $k$-dependent imaginary part is the claimed signature of genuinely dissipative behavior induced by the quantum-geometric microstructure, distinct from ordinary Hubble friction.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation stands on treating a complicated inverse differential operator as a simple number at early times, and on neglecting interactions in the underlying quantum-gravity action; if either step fails, the effective wave equation is nonlocal and the claimed dispersion relation collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the derivation holds, the homogeneous scalar field on the emergent background automatically reproduces the late-time massless behavior, so the standard cosmological scalar sector is recovered without separate input.
Near the bounce, the scalar equation deviates from $\ddot\phi_0=0$; these corrections could alter how a scalar clock relates to relational time in high-curvature regimes.
The perturbation wave equation contains $\nabla^2\delta\dot\phi$ and $\nabla^4\delta\phi$ terms suppressed by $\alpha_i$ and $\beta$; in the decoupled regime they vanish and the standard form reappears.
The dispersion relation (32) contains a $k$-dependent imaginary part from $\Gamma_k=k^2f_2-f_1$, so inhomogeneous scalar modes can grow or decay with a wavelength-dependent rate, not just Hubble friction.
Because geometry and matter are reconstructed from the same condensate, the effective field theory is not assumed but emergent, which is the kind of step needed to connect quantum gravity to cosmological phenomenology.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the $Q\to qI$ step is only valid at long wavelengths, the exact inverse operator will generate nonlocal terms; a worthwhile extension is to compute those terms and check whether the dissipative part of (32) survives at finite wavelength.
The wavenumber-dependent imaginary part could be imprinted on a primordial scalar perturbation spectrum; a search for scale-dependent damping or growth in CMB observables is a natural, if indirect, test.
The same long-wavelength hydrodynamic approximation used here appears in condensed-matter analogue gravity, so the dispersion relation could in principle be probed in laboratory analogue systems.
The paper's need to discard volume-growing modes by imposing intensiveness of the scalar field hints that the physical Hilbert-space selection may also remove or modify some of the dissipative terms; testing this would clarify which corrections are robust.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Worth reading if you work on extracting effective matter dynamics from a background-independent quantum-gravity formalism. The genuinely new piece is Eq. (28): a perturbative wave equation for scalar inhomogeneities derived from the coupled density-phase condensate dynamics, with coefficients fixed by the background. That leads to Eq. (32), a dispersion relation with a k-dependent imaginary part — the first time, as far as I can tell, that GFT condensate cosmology yields an explicit dissipative signature of this kind. The background sector largely re-derives Marchetti-Oriti in cleaner form, but the reconstruction from condensate phase to a scalar EOM is clearly laid out, and the late-time classical limit is handled honestly, including the extensive-branch problem and the need to impose c1=0.

The soft spot is exactly where the stress-test note lands. To get Eq. (28) as a local PDE, the authors replace Q=(□̃−η)^{-1} by qI, citing BEC analogue gravity long-wavelength logic. But the k^2 and k^4 terms in Eq. (32) become important precisely when that long-wavelength approximation breaks down. No bound on |k^2/η| or |ω^2/η| is given, and the background is time-dependent, so dropping commutators of Q with ∂0 needs an estimate too. The paper acknowledges J̃ is dropped but does not quantify how it compares with the f terms. These are not fatal to the whole framework — the homogeneous sector and the decoupled limit are on firmer ground — but they do mean the headline dissipation is conditional on an unverified scale separation.

The free-theory and single-dominant-mode truncations are stated clearly, so I do not count them as hidden. The model parameters α_i, β, η are free, so this is not yet a testable prediction. But it is a coherent derivation path with the right level of transparency about what is assumed. I would send it to peer review and ask for a step-by-step derivation of Eq. (28), including the Q inversion and an explicit regime where |k^2/η| is small enough for qI while the k-dependent terms are still physically present, or a bound making clear they are parametrically suppressed.

This is mainly for the GFT and quantum-gravity phenomenology communities. A serious referee can push on the scale-separation assumption; the paper deserves that push.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This Letter attempts to derive an effective scalar-field theory for matter in group field theory (GFT) condensate cosmology, working in a relational framework and in a regime of negligible GFT interactions. From the condensate Madelung variables (density and phase) it reconstructs the homogeneous scalar-field expectation value Φ0 = ρ0^2 ∂πϕ θ0 and obtains an effective background equation of motion (12), which reduces to a massless scalar on a flat FLRW background at late times after the additional condition c1 = 0. For inhomogeneous perturbations, the paper writes linearized equations for density and phase perturbations, introduces the inverse operator Q = (□̃ − η)^{-1}, obtains a phase perturbation equation (24), and then an effective scalar perturbation equation (28) with coefficients f1...f5 and a source J̃. In the decoupled regime the late-time equation reduces to the standard form (31); in the coupled regime, a WKB treatment leads to the dispersion relation (32), which contains a k-dependent imaginary part interpreted as genuine dissipation. The main advertised results are therefore (i) a modified background dynamics near the bounce, and (ii) a modified dispersion relation for scalar perturbations in the early universe.

Significance. If the derivation could be made rigorous, the paper would be a valuable contribution: it provides a concrete route from GFT condensate dynamics to an effective matter sector, with the attractive feature that the late-time limit recovers a massless scalar on an FLRW spacetime while early-time corrections are expressed as explicit modifications to the dispersion relation. The relational construction is coherent, the paper is candid about the need to select an intensive physical sector, and the k-dependent imaginary part in Eq. (32) is a falsifiable prediction in principle. However, the significance is presently limited by three issues: the central local approximation Q ≃ qI is not quantitatively justified; the passage from Eq. (27) to Eq. (28) is not shown; and the physical-sector restrictions are imposed by hand. The advertised signatures therefore remain conditional on a scale-separation assumption whose range of validity has not been established.

major comments (4)

[§Effective field theory of cosmological perturbations, Eqs. (19)–(32)] The replacement Q = (□̃ − η)^{-1} ≃ qI is the step that turns Eq. (28) into a local partial differential equation, but the manuscript gives no quantitative justification for it. The BEC analogue-gravity argument quoted in Refs. [49–51] applies to long wavelengths, i.e. |ω^2|, |α_r k^2| ≪ |η|; in that regime the k^2 and k^4 terms in Γ_k and f4, which are the advertised signatures, are suppressed, while in the regime where those terms are non-negligible the qI approximation cannot be trusted. No numerical values or bounds are given for η, α_r, or the range of k. Moreover, the background is time-dependent, so Q does not commute with ∂0 acting on background-dependent coefficients; the commutator terms are dropped without an estimate. This step is load-bearing for the dispersion relation (32), so the central claim is currently unverified.
[§Effective field theory of cosmological perturbations, Eqs. (24)–(29)] The derivation of Eq. (28) from Eq. (24) is not shown in the manuscript. Eq. (27) relates δϕ to both δρ and δθ, but δρ is an independent dynamical variable; the inversion used to eliminate δρ, the treatment of derivatives of Q acting on background functions, and the explicit computation of f5 and J̃ are all omitted. Without this derivation a reader cannot verify that the coefficients in Eq. (29) are complete or that the source term J̃ has been correctly identified. This is a central step in the paper's main claim, not a mere presentational detail.
[§Effective background scalar field dynamics, Eqs. (12)–(15); §Conclusion] The physical sector is selected by hand at both levels. In the homogeneous case, the general solution (15) contains an extensive branch c1 e^{2μx0}; the late-time massless behavior is obtained only by imposing c1 = 0, and the conclusion states that perturbations growing like the volume 'must be removed by restricting the solution space through the additional requirement that the scalar field be an intensive quantity.' The paper acknowledges this restriction but does not derive it from the condensate dynamics. Consequently, Eqs. (12) and (28) describe only a subset of solutions, and the claim that the effective dynamics is 'derived' is weaker than stated.
[§Dispersion relation, Eq. (32)] The source term J̃ is neglected in deriving Eq. (32), but its magnitude is never compared with the f_i terms. Since J̃ depends on the spacetime coordinates and on δV and δθ, it could contribute at the same order as the k^2 or k^4 corrections unless additional suppression is shown. The paper itself defers the role of the source terms to future work. Also, the adiabatic condition |Ω̇_k/Ω_k^2| ≪ 1 is asserted, but no check is provided for the bounce regime where the coefficients f_i vary rapidly. Thus Eq. (32) should be presented as a partial dispersion relation, not as the full effective dispersion relation of the theory.

minor comments (5)

[§Effective field theory of cosmological perturbations, Eqs. (25)–(26)] When α_i = 0, Q is still the inverse operator (□̃ − η)^{-1}, but the coefficients λ1 and λ2 in Eq. (26) are written as products of Q with background functions, which suggests that Q has already been replaced by a multiplicative constant; the text should state explicitly whether Eq. (25) already assumes the qI approximation.
[§Effective background scalar field dynamics, Eq. (13)] The term J0 is called 'noise-like' in the text, but as defined in Eq. (13) it is a deterministic function of the background variables; the wording should be adjusted to avoid implying stochasticity.
[§Effective field theory of cosmological perturbations, Eq. (30)] The constant c2 appears in Eq. (30) without being defined; the manuscript should state its relation to the integration constants appearing in the background solutions.
[§Effective field theory of cosmological perturbations, §Conclusion] The text says the ∇^2 δφ̇ and ∇^4 δφ terms 'are proportional to α_i and β and are therefore suppressed,' but the dispersion relation (32) includes these terms as the leading early-time corrections; the suppression scale and the expansion parameter should be specified rather than stated qualitatively.
[References] Reference [36] is malformed and should be corrected; the reader cannot identify the intended source from the current citation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the effective scalar field is a relational reconstruction from condensate variables, and the late-time GR behavior is an explicit consistency condition, not a hidden input.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained as a reconstruction: the scalar-field observable is defined in Eq. (5) as rho0^2 d_pi phi theta0, and its equations of motion are obtained by differentiating the GFT condensate background and perturbation equations (6)-(7), (19)-(24). This is a dictionary between condensate variables and an effective matter field, not a circular use of the target result. The late-time GR limit is reached through the explicit parameter identifications (10)-(11) and the branch choice c1=0; the paper labels this an imposition ('Imposing c1 = 0 yields the expected late-time classical behavior'), so the 'recovery' of standard dynamics is a consistency condition rather than a disguised fit. The perturbative wave equation (28) and dispersion relation (32) follow algebraically from Eq. (24) after the Q=(box-tilde-eta)^(-1) approx qI approximation; the validity of that approximation for the k-dependent terms is a substantive correctness concern, since no scale separation is quantified and the long-wavelength justification suppresses the k^2 and k^4 terms that are presented as signatures, but this is not a definitional circularity. Self-citations to [19,20,24] supply the background GFT dynamics, yet the present derivation extends rather than assumes the target scalar-field dynamics, and no uniqueness theorem is imported. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation introduces no new particles or forces. The free parameters are all coefficients of the assumed GFT kinetic kernel; they are left unspecified, so the predicted quantum gravity corrections are not numerically fixed. The axioms include the standard condensate and free-theory approximations and an ad hoc solution-sector restriction needed to recover GR.

free parameters (6)

γ = unspecified
Kinetic kernel peak width parameter in Eq. (2); controls dissipation-like terms in background and perturbation equations.
E(π_φ) = unspecified (late-time limit sets μ=π_φ)
Kinetic kernel eigenvalue in Eq. (2); with μ²=η²−γ²/4 it sets the background solution; in the GR limit μ is identified with π_φ.
α_r = unspecified
Real part of the complex coefficient α² in Eq. (2); sets the spatial gradient term and hence the propagation speed of perturbations in Eq. (30).
α_i = unspecified
Imaginary part of α²; produces β, the mixed derivative term D in Eq. (24), and the dissipative k-dependent terms in Eq. (32).
β = β ∝ α_i
Parameter in Eq. (7) and (24); controls the coupling between density and phase perturbations.
η = unspecified (μ² = η² − γ²/4)
Constant in the background equations (6)-(7); combines with γ to set the effective frequency μ.

assumptions (7)

domain assumption Coherent condensate mean-field state, ⟨δS/δφ†⟩_σ = 0.
Used to obtain Eq. (2) from the action (1); assumes the condensate is well described by a coherent state.
domain assumption Negligible GFT interactions, S = K only.
The entire derivation starts from the free action (1); interactions are dropped, so the claimed 'fundamental dynamics' is a free-field approximation.
domain assumption σ_j(ψ) factorizes and is sharply peaked around ψ0 = (x^μ, π_φ).
Reduces the field to a reduced wave function depending on relational rods and clock, used throughout.
domain assumption Single dominant spin mode j is selected by the free dynamics.
The analysis restricts to the mode with exponentially largest occupation; other modes are neglected.
domain assumption Inverse operator Q = (□̃−η)^{-1} is approximated by a multiplicative constant qI in the early-time regime.
Critical for deriving Eq. (28); justified only for long wavelengths by analogy with BEC analogue gravity, not proven in the paper.
domain assumption WKB/adiabatic approximation for the time-dependent modes.
Used to obtain the dispersion relation (32) from the homogeneous version of Eq. (28).
ad hoc to paper Physical sector restriction: c1 = 0 and intensive scalar perturbations are imposed to discard volume-growing modes.
Necessary to recover the late-time classical limit φ¨0=0 and to remove unphysical modes; this is a selection rule not derived from the GFT dynamics.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Emergent scalar field dynamics in a cosmological spacetime from GFT quantum gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Q3IHNNBX

@misc{pith2026260812003,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Emergent scalar field dynamics in a cosmological spacetime from GFT quantum gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Q3IHNNBX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12003}
}

read the original abstract

We derive an effective scalar field theory for matter in group field theory condensate cosmology, starting from the fundamental quantum-gravity dynamics in a fully relational framework and encompassing both early- and late-universe regimes. The collective hydrodynamics of the underlying quantum geometry allows us to reconstruct both the homogeneous cosmological dynamics of matter and geometry and an inhomogeneous local field-theory description. Localization in space and time is defined relationally with respect to a material reference frame. At the homogeneous level, we obtain a modified scalar field theory on the emergent FLRW spacetime selected by the condensate. It recovers the standard dynamics of a massless scalar field in the late-time general-relativistic regime while retaining quantum-gravity corrections near the cosmological bounce. At the perturbative level, scalar inhomogeneities obey an effective wave equation that carries signatures of the underlying quantum-gravity microstructure. In the early-universe regime, this equation exhibits a modified dispersion relation with both dispersive and dissipative contributions. These corrections provide a concrete avenue for identifying phenomenological signatures of quantum gravity directly from a fundamental quantum-gravity framework.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

[1]

Sinceρ 2 0̸= 0 throughout the evolution, consistently with the nonsingular bouncing dy- namics of the model [35, 39], this inversion is always well- defined. Moreover, since the solutions are sufficiently reg- ular, the mixed derivatives commute, we can differentiate the equation of motion forθ 0 in Eq.(7) with respect toπϕ and rewrite the resulting expre...
[2]

Maggiore,Gravitational Waves

M. Maggiore,Gravitational Waves. Vol. 2: Astrophysics and Cosmology(Oxford University Press, 2018)

2018
[3]

Montani, M

G. Montani, M. V. Battisti, R. Benini, and G. Imponente, Primordial Cosmology(World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., 2011)

work page 2011
[4]

R. M. Wald,General relativity(Chicago Univ. Press, Chicago, IL, 1984)

work page 1984
[5]

L. H. Ford, Quantum field theory in curved spacetime (1997)

work page 1997
[6]

P. C. W. D. N. D. Birrell,Quantum fields in curved space, cup ed., Cambridge Monographs on Mathemati- cal Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1984)

work page 1984
[7]

Mukhanov,Physical Foundations of Cosmology(Cam- bridge Univ

V. Mukhanov,Physical Foundations of Cosmology(Cam- bridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2005)

work page 2005
[8]

Kiefer,Quantum Gravity(Oxford University Press, 2004)

C. Kiefer,Quantum Gravity(Oxford University Press, 2004)

work page 2004

Show all 52 references

[9]

Kiritsis,String theory in a nutshell(Princeton Uni- versity Press, USA, 2019)

E. Kiritsis,String theory in a nutshell(Princeton Uni- versity Press, USA, 2019)

2019
[10]

Giesel and H

K. Giesel and H. Sahlmann, From Classical To Quantum Gravity: Introduction to Loop Quantum Gravity,Pro- ceedings, 3rd Quantum Geometry and Quantum Gravity School: Zakopane, Poland, February 28-March 13, 2011, PoSQGQGS2011, 002 (2011), arXiv:1203.2733 [gr-qc]

2011 arXiv
[11]

Oriti, D

D. Oriti, D. Pranzetti, J. P. Ryan, and L. Sindoni, Gener- alized quantum gravity condensates for homogeneous ge- ometries and cosmology, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 235016 (2015), arXiv:1501.00936 [gr-qc]

2015 arXiv
[12]

Gielen, D

S. Gielen, D. Oriti, and L. Sindoni, Cosmology from Group Field Theory Formalism for Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 031301 (2013), arXiv:1303.3576 [gr-qc]

2013 arXiv
[13]

Gielen and A

S. Gielen and A. Polaczek, Generalised effective cosmol- ogy from group field theory, Class. Quant. Grav.37, 165004 (2020), arXiv:1912.06143 [gr-qc]

2020 arXiv
[14]

Marchetti and D

L. Marchetti and D. Oriti, Quantum Fluctuations in the Effective Relational GFT Cosmology, Front. Astron. Space Sci.0, 110 (2021), arXiv:2010.09700 [gr-qc]

2021 arXiv
[15]

Gielen and D

S. Gielen and D. Oriti, Cosmological perturbations from full quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D98, 106019 (2018), arXiv:1709.01095 [gr-qc]

2018 arXiv
[16]

P. A. Hoehn, A. R. H. Smith, and M. P. E. Lock, Trin- ity of relational quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. D104, 066001 (2021), arXiv:1912.00033 [quant-ph]

2021 arXiv
[17]

Y. Li, D. Oriti, and M. Zhang, Group field theory for quantum gravity minimally coupled to a scalar field, Class. Quant. Grav.34, 195001 (2017), arXiv:1701.08719 [gr-qc]

2017 arXiv
[18]

Giesel, B.-F

K. Giesel, B.-F. Li, and P. Singh, Relating dust reference models to conventional systems in manifestly gauge in- variant perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D104, 023501 (2021), arXiv:2012.14443 [gr-qc]

2021 arXiv
[21]

Marchetti and D

L. Marchetti and D. Oriti, Effective relational cosmolog- ical dynamics from Quantum Gravity, JHEP05, 025, arXiv:2008.02774 [gr-qc]

2008 arXiv
[22]

Gielen, D

S. Gielen, D. Oriti, and L. Sindoni, Homogeneous cos- 7 mologies as group field theory condensates, JHEP06, 013, arXiv:1311.1238 [gr-qc]

arXiv
[23]

Gielen, Inhomogeneous universe from group field the- ory condensate, JCAP02, 013, arXiv:1811.10639 [gr-qc]

S. Gielen, Inhomogeneous universe from group field the- ory condensate, JCAP02, 013, arXiv:1811.10639 [gr-qc]

arXiv
[24]

Gielen and L

S. Gielen and L. Mickel, Cosmological scalar perturba- tions for a metric reconstructed from group field theory, Class. Quant. Grav.42, 225015 (2025), arXiv:2505.07951 [gr-qc]

2025
[25]

Marchetti and D

L. Marchetti and D. Oriti, Effective dynamics of scalar cosmological perturbations from quantum gravity, JCAP 07(07), 004, arXiv:2112.12677 [gr-qc]

arXiv
[26]

Addaziet al., Quantum gravity phenomenology at the dawn of the multi-messenger era—A review, Prog

A. Addaziet al., Quantum gravity phenomenology at the dawn of the multi-messenger era—A review, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.125, 103948 (2022), arXiv:2111.05659 [hep- ph]

2022 arXiv
[27]

Freidel, Group field theory: An Overview, Int

L. Freidel, Group field theory: An Overview, Int. J. Theor. Phys.44, 1769 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0505016

2005 arXiv
[28]

Krajewski, Group field theories, PoSQGQGS2011, 005 (2011), arXiv:1210.6257 [gr-qc]

T. Krajewski, Group field theories, PoSQGQGS2011, 005 (2011), arXiv:1210.6257 [gr-qc]

2011 arXiv
[29]

D. Oriti, The microscopic dynamics of quantum space as a group field theory, inProceedings, Foundations of Space and Time: Reflections on Quantum Gravity: Cape Town, South Africa(2011) pp. 257–320, arXiv:1110.5606 [hep-th]

2011 arXiv
[30]

Tambornino, Relational observables in gravity: a re- view, Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications 10.3842/sigma.2012.017 (2012)

J. Tambornino, Relational observables in gravity: a re- view, Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications 10.3842/sigma.2012.017 (2012)

2012 doi
[31]

Oriti, L

D. Oriti, L. Sindoni, and E. Wilson-Ewing, Emergent Friedmann dynamics with a quantum bounce from quan- tum gravity condensates, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 224001 (2016), arXiv:1602.05881 [gr-qc]

2016 arXiv
[32]

Gielen and L

S. Gielen and L. Sindoni, Quantum Cosmology from Group Field Theory Condensates: a Review, SIGMA12, 082 (2016), arXiv:1602.08104 [gr-qc]

2016 arXiv
[33]

Oriti, Group field theory as the 2nd quantization of Loop Quantum Gravity, Class

D. Oriti, Group field theory as the 2nd quantization of Loop Quantum Gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 085005 (2016), arXiv:1310.7786 [gr-qc]

2016 arXiv
[34]

Oriti, Group field theory as the second quantization of loop quantum gravity, Classical and Quantum Gravity 33, 1 (2016)

D. Oriti, Group field theory as the second quantization of loop quantum gravity, Classical and Quantum Gravity 33, 1 (2016)

2016
[35]

Oriti,Spacetime as a quantum many-body system, (2017), arXiv:1710.02807 [gr-qc]

D. Oriti,Spacetime as a quantum many-body system, (2017), arXiv:1710.02807 [gr-qc]

2017 arXiv
[36]

Oriti,Tensorial Group Field Theory condensate cos- mology as an example of spacetime emergence in quantum gravity(2021) arXiv:2112.02585 [gr-qc]

D. Oriti,Tensorial Group Field Theory condensate cos- mology as an example of spacetime emergence in quantum gravity(2021) arXiv:2112.02585 [gr-qc]

2021 arXiv
[37]

M. G. I.M. Gel’fand,Geometry of homogeneous spaces, representations of groups in homogeneous spaces and re- lated questions of integral geometry
[38]

Gielen, Quantum cosmology of (loop) quantum grav- ity condensates: An example, Class

S. Gielen, Quantum cosmology of (loop) quantum grav- ity condensates: An example, Class. Quant. Grav.31, 155009 (2014), arXiv:1404.2944 [gr-qc]

2014 arXiv
[39]

A. F. Jercher, D. Oriti, and A. G. A. Pithis, Emer- gent cosmology from quantum gravity in the lorentzian barrett-crane tensorial group field theory model, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2022(01), 050
[40]

A. G. A. Pithis and M. Sakellariadou, Group field the- ory condensate cosmology: An appetizer, Universe5, 147 (2019), arXiv:1904.00598 [gr-qc]

2019 arXiv
[41]

Perez and D

A. Perez and D. Sudarsky, Dark energy from quantum gravity discreteness, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 221302 (2019), arXiv:1711.05183 [gr-qc]

2019 arXiv
[42]

Pellecchia, A

P. Pellecchia, A. Perez, and S. Ribisi, Dark energy gene- sis: modeling dissipative effects in primordial cosmology, (2026), arXiv:2607.03272 [gr-qc]

2026 arXiv
[43]

A. F. Jercher, L. Marchetti, and A. G. A. Pithis, Scalar cosmological perturbations from quantum gravitational entanglement, Class. Quant. Grav.41, 18LT01 (2024), arXiv:2310.17549 [gr-qc]

2024 arXiv
[44]

A. F. Jercher, L. Marchetti, and A. G. A. Pithis, Scalar cosmological perturbations from quantum entanglement within Lorentzian quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D109, 066021 (2024), arXiv:2308.13261 [gr-qc]

2024 arXiv
[45]

K. V. Kuchar and C. G. Torre, Harmonic gauge in canon- ical gravity,44
[46]

Marchetti and E

L. Marchetti and E. Wilson-Ewing, Relational observ- ables in group field theory, Class. Quant. Grav.42, 155008 (2025), arXiv:2412.14622 [gr-qc]

2025 arXiv
[47]

Mukhanov, H

V. Mukhanov, H. Feldman, and R. Brandenberger, The- ory of cosmological perturbations, Physics Reports215, 203 (1992)

1992
[48]

Bret´ o n, J

N. Bret´ o n, J. L. Cervantes-Cota, and M. Salgado, eds.,The Early Universe and Observational Cosmology (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004)

2004
[49]

Tapia and C

T. Tapia and C. Rojas, Scalar Cosmological Perturba- tions, (2020), arXiv:2007.04423 [gr-qc]

2020 arXiv
[50]

R. G. Torrom´ e, M. Letizia, and S. Liberati, Phenomenol- ogy of effective geometries from quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D92, 124021 (2015), arXiv:1507.03205 [gr-qc]

2015 arXiv
[51]

Barcelo, S

C. Barcelo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, Analogue gravity, Living Rev. Rel.8, 12 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0505065

2005 arXiv
[52]

Barcelo, M

C. Barcelo, M. Visser, and S. Liberati, Einstein gravity as an emergent phenomenon?, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D10, 799 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0106002

2001 arXiv
[53]

Clifton, P

T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis, Modified Gravity and Cosmology, Phys. Rept.513, 1 (2012), arXiv:1106.2476 [astro-ph.CO]

2012 arXiv
[54]

Liberati and L

S. Liberati and L. Maccione, Astrophysical constraints on planck scale dissipative phenomena, Physical Review Letters112, 10.1103/physrevlett.112.151301 (2014)

2014 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Sinceρ 2 0̸= 0 throughout the evolution, consistently with the nonsingular bouncing dy- namics of the model [35, 39], this inversion is always well- defined. Moreover, since the solutions are sufficiently reg- ular, the mixed derivatives commute, we can differentiate the equation of motion forθ 0 in Eq.(7) with respect toπϕ and rewrite the resulting expre...

[2] [2]

Maggiore,Gravitational Waves

M. Maggiore,Gravitational Waves. Vol. 2: Astrophysics and Cosmology(Oxford University Press, 2018)

2018

[3] [3]

Montani, M

G. Montani, M. V. Battisti, R. Benini, and G. Imponente, Primordial Cosmology(World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., 2011)

work page 2011

[4] [4]

R. M. Wald,General relativity(Chicago Univ. Press, Chicago, IL, 1984)

work page 1984

[5] [5]

L. H. Ford, Quantum field theory in curved spacetime (1997)

work page 1997

[6] [6]

P. C. W. D. N. D. Birrell,Quantum fields in curved space, cup ed., Cambridge Monographs on Mathemati- cal Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1984)

work page 1984

[7] [7]

Mukhanov,Physical Foundations of Cosmology(Cam- bridge Univ

V. Mukhanov,Physical Foundations of Cosmology(Cam- bridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2005)

work page 2005

[8] [8]

Kiefer,Quantum Gravity(Oxford University Press, 2004)

C. Kiefer,Quantum Gravity(Oxford University Press, 2004)

work page 2004