Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 46 references

Design of high-strength, radiopure copper-chromium alloys for rare-event searches assisted by computational thermodynamics

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Computational thermodynamics finds a better heat treatment for radiopure CuCr alloys.

desk verdict A useful, honest CALPHAD design study for radiopure CuCr alloys, whose quantitative aging predictions rest on an unmeasured interfacial energy and need a sensitivity analysis. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.23231 v2 pith:QGCUWTZG submitted 2025-06-29 physics.ins-det hep-ex

Dimitra Spathara This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.ins-dethep-ex
keywords electroformedcoppercopper-chromiumalloysrare-eventsearchesradiopuritycomputationalthermodynamicsCALPHADprecipitationstrengtheningDICTRA
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes that computational thermodynamics can be used to design the thermal processing of electroformed copper–chromium alloys, which are candidate structural materials for rare-event search detectors because they combine high strength with radiopurity. By simulating homogenization with DICTRA and precipitation aging with TC-PRISMA, running on the TCHEA6/MOBHEA3 CALPHAD databases, it reproduces the Cr concentration profiles measured in an earlier experimental study and then goes beyond that recipe. The simulations indicate that a 24-hour solution heat treatment at 1050 °C is preferable to the previously used 1025 °C, and that aging at lower temperatures (such as 400 °C) for longer times gives the highest predicted yield strength. The wider point is that this materials-design pathway could cut the number of fabricate-and-test cycles needed to bring stronger, radiopure alloys into next-generation dark matter and neutrinoless double-beta decay experiments.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is a pair of kinetic simulation modules run on the TCHEA6/MOBHEA3 CALPHAD databases: DICTRA, which solves moving-boundary diffusion equations to follow the bcc-to-fcc transformation during solution heat treatment, and TC-PRISMA, which evolves precipitate nucleation and growth during aging via Langer–Schwartz and Kampmann–Wagner kinetics. Their outputs—Cr concentration profiles, precipitate mean radius, and volume fraction—feed into the Fleischer equation for solid-solution strengthening and the Orowan equation for precipitation strengthening, and the sum of the two is the predicted yield strength that guides the recommended temperatures and times.

What would settle it

Electroform a 1 µm Cr / 400 µm Cu stack, solution-treat it at 1050 °C for 24 h, and then age samples at 400, 450, and 500 °C; measure the precipitate radius, volume fraction, and yield strength over time. If the strength maximum or the time to reach 0.61% precipitate volume fraction differs substantially from the predicted 300, 60, and 10–12 minutes, the chosen databases or the 0.7 J/m² interfacial energy would need revision.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the kinetic CALPHAD simulation chain reproduces the published experimental behavior of electroformed CuCr alloys and identifies concrete improvements: a 1 µm Cr layer on 400 µm Cu homogenizes to about 0.2 wt% Cr after 24 h at 1050 °C, whereas the 1025 °C treatment used previously requires about 72 h; a 10 µm Cr layer is too thick to homogenize in 24 h. For aging of Cu–0.5Cr, the simulations predict that the maximum yield strength is obtained by aging at lower temperature for longer times, because the precipitate volume fraction keeps rising while the mean radius stays small. The calculated TTT diagram gives the time to reach the maximum 0.61% precipitate volume fraction as roughly 10–12 minutes at 500 °C, 60 minutes at 450 °C, and 300 minutes at 400 °C, so the earlier 12-hour aging at 500 °C is much longer than needed and likely already enters coarsening.

Load-bearing premise

The simulations take the energy per area of the interface between the chromium precipitates and the copper matrix to be 0.7 J/m², a value taken from an earlier calculation rather than from a direct measurement of radiopure CuCr; if the real value differs, the predicted optimum temperatures and aging times change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A 24-hour solution heat treatment at 1050 °C should homogenize a 1 µm Cr / 400 µm Cu electroformed stack to a uniform ~0.2 wt% Cr alloy, whereas 1025 °C requires roughly 72 hours to reach the same state.
  • Aging Cu–0.5Cr at lower temperatures and longer times, e.g., 400 °C, is predicted to yield higher total strength than the 500 °C / 12 h recipe previously reported.
  • According to the TTT diagram, the maximum precipitate volume fraction of 0.61% is reached within about 10–12 min at 500 °C, so the prior 12-hour aging is far beyond the optimum and already in coarsening.
  • Simulations with the TCHEA6/MOBHEA3 databases agree closely with earlier calculations using Cu-specific databases for precipitate volume fraction and matrix Cr concentration, indicating the approach is robust to database choice.
  • The same modeling chain can be used to optimize the Cr layer thickness and thermal schedule of future radiopure alloys, providing a faster design route for detector materials.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the true interfacial energy differs from the adopted 0.7 J/m², the quantitative aging recommendations would shift; a measurement of that quantity would be the most direct way to tighten the predictions.
  • The same simulation workflow could be applied to other radiopure copper alloy systems, such as Cu–Ti or Cu–Zr, as long as thermodynamic and kinetic databases are available, offering a fast screening path for detector materials.
  • A decisive test would be to fabricate the recommended stack and thermal schedule and compare measured precipitate size distributions and yield strength to the simulated ones; the paper itself notes such experimental comparison is still missing.
  • Because the differences between database sets change the predicted precipitation window, the eventual choice of database for radiopure alloys may need to be made on experimental precipitate data rather than on thermodynamic consistency alone.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a computational thermodynamics workflow, based on the Thermo-Calc DICTRA and TC-PRISMA modules with the TCHEA6 and MOBHEA3 databases, to design the thermal processing of electroformed, radiopure copper-chromium alloys for rare-event searches. DICTRA simulations of solution heat treatment for Cu layers in contact with Cr layers are compared with the experimental Cr concentration profiles of Vitale et al., and TC-PRISMA simulations of aging for Cu-0.5Cr are compared with the calculations of Huang et al. The paper claims agreement at the lower isothermals, deduces that 24 h at 1050 °C is preferable to the 1025 °C treatment used in Ref. [19], and recommends aging at lower temperatures (400–450 °C) for longer times as more effective than the 500 °C, 12 h schedule previously reported. The ultimate goal is to provide a faster, predictive route toward high-strength radiopure alloys for dark matter and neutrinoless double-beta decay detectors.

Significance. If the claims are robust, the paper demonstrates a useful transfer of CALPHAD-based materials design into the low-background physics community, with a concrete, falsifiable recommendation for the solutionizing and aging schedule of radiopure CuCr alloys. The work is transparent about the commercial tools and databases used, and it engages directly with published experimental data, which makes the comparison reproducible in principle. The paper also explicitly identifies the importance of the interfacial energy and the need for future experimental validation, which is a sign of scientific care. Its main value would be as a design methodology paper: it shows how DICTRA and TC-PRISMA can be used to narrow the process window before costly electroforming campaigns. However, the quantitative reliability of the aging recommendation currently rests on an unmeasured interfacial energy and on yield-strength predictions that have not been validated against experiments, so the significance is conditional on additional sensitivity analysis and validation.

major comments (3)
  1. [3.2, Eq. (1) and 4.2, Fig. 5] The central aging recommendation (lower temperatures for longer times) is governed by TC-PRISMA nucleation kinetics, and the nucleation barrier in Eq. (1) depends on the interfacial energy σ as ΔG* ∝ σ³. The adopted value σ = 0.7 J/m² is taken from Ref. [10], a Cu-Cr-Ti casting study using different CALPHAD databases, and no sensitivity analysis is provided. Because a modest change in σ can alter nucleation rates by orders of magnitude, the predicted peak-aging time, the precipitate radius driving Eq. (3), and the resulting optimal 400–450 °C window are all sensitive to this choice. The manuscript itself acknowledges in Sec. 4.2 that the interfacial energy is crucial and may affect predictions, but the load-bearing design recommendation still depends on it. I ask for a quantitative sensitivity study over a physically plausible range of σ (e.g., 0.4–1.0 J/m²) and a statement of how the optimal aging temperature/duration shifts, or an experimental measurement of σ for the radiopure Cu-Cr system.
  2. [4.2, Eqs. (2)–(4) and Fig. 5] The yield-strength predictions are not validated against experimental data for radiopure CuCr alloys. The solid-solution parameters δ and η in Eq. (2) are taken from Ref. [10], which concerns a Cu-Cr-Ti alloy, and the Orowan contribution in Eq. (3) uses the simulated radius and volume fraction from TC-PRISMA; no comparison is made with, for example, the hardness data reported in Refs. [18,19]. In addition, what is labeled 'total yield strength' in Fig. 5(c) is the sum of the solid-solution and precipitation strengthening increments, not the absolute yield strength; the base strength of electroformed copper is not included. The reader could therefore overinterpret the magnitude of the predicted strength. Please clarify this definition and provide at least one experimental benchmark (or a clearly stated conversion to hardness) before claiming that the proposed aging schedule maximizes mechanical enhancement.
  3. [4.1, Figs. 2 and 3] The deduction that 24 h at 1050 °C is optimal relies on comparisons with experimental data from Ref. [19] that are only qualitative. No goodness-of-fit metrics, error bars, or concentration-profile uncertainties are given, and the experimental profiles correspond to samples that were aged at 500 °C after solutionizing, so the 1025 °C comparison in Fig. 3 is partly confounded by precipitation during aging. The manuscript acknowledges this confound, but it still uses the comparison to support a specific process recommendation. Please provide a quantitative comparison metric (e.g., residual analysis over the reported spatial range) or reframe the 1050 °C recommendation as a simulation-based prediction pending dedicated experimental validation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction and Sec. 3.1] There are minor typographical errors: 'faced centred cubic' should be 'face-centred cubic'; 'modlules' in the last paragraph of Sec. 4.2 should be 'modules'; the caption of Fig. 5 uses 'stengthening' for 'strengthening'.
  2. [3.2, nucleation equation] The equation for the time-dependent nucleation rate J(t) = Js exp(−τ/t) is printed with an ambiguous expression 'exp (− −τ t )'; the sign and parentheses should be fixed for clarity.
  3. [4.2, Fig. 5] The text states that the final mean radius at 400 °C is predicted to be the same as at 450 °C, yet the same paragraph says the maximum radius generally decreases with temperature; this tension is not explained, and a brief comment on the plateau behavior would help the reader interpret Fig. 4(c).
  4. [References] Reference [10] is used for the interfacial energy, the solid-solution parameters, and the Orowan spacing formula; given the load-bearing role of these inputs, it would be helpful to state explicitly which quantities in Ref. [10] are experimental and which are calculated from yet another simulation setup.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's conclusions rest on independent experimental benchmarks and database cross-comparisons, with parameter uncertainties explicitly acknowledged rather than disguised as predictions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The solution-heat-treatment recommendation (24 h at 1050 °C) is drawn from DICTRA simulations that are directly compared with independent experimental Cr profiles from Vitale et al. [19], and the paper explicitly states agreement with those measurements. The aging and yield-strength predictions are benchmarked against independent simulations by Huang et al. [10] using different CALPHAD databases (TCCU3/MOBCU3), and the paper notes that the differences are small and attributes them to database choice. The interfacial energy σ = 0.7 J/m² is adopted from Ref. [10] as an input parameter, not fitted to the quantities being predicted; the paper explicitly flags that this value is a calculation rather than a measurement and may affect predictions of yield-strength evolution. That is an acknowledged parameter uncertainty, not a self-referential reduction. Self-citations are limited to a companion paper [17] and a methodology reference [37]; neither is load-bearing for the main conclusions. No fitted input is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported, and no known result is repackaged as new. The central claims therefore have independent content and are not equivalent to their inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central simulation chain relies on standard CALPHAD databases and classical nucleation and growth theory. The only input parameter not directly measured is the interfacial energy sigma, which is taken from a prior simulation-based study. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Interfacial energy sigma (bcc Cr / fcc Cu) = 0.7 J/m2
    Used in Eq. (1) for the nucleation barrier in TC-PRISMA. No experimental value exists; adopted from calculations in Ref. [10]. Directly affects predicted precipitate radius, volume fraction, and hence yield strength evolution.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption TCHEA6 and MOBHEA3 CALPHAD databases accurately describe the thermodynamics and kinetics of the Cu-Cr system.
    The simulations use these high-entropy-alloy databases. The paper notes they are not yet validated for radiopure alloys and that differences from TCCU3/MOBCU3 are small but present (Section 4.2).
  • domain assumption The DICTRA moving boundary model with local two-phase equilibrium and mass conservation at a planar interface applies to the Cu/Cr diffusion couple.
    Used in Section 3.1 to simulate homogenization; assumes planar geometry and local equilibrium, which may deviate near rough electrodeposited interfaces as noted in the discussion of the 10 um Cr case.
  • domain assumption Classical nucleation theory (Langer-Schwartz) as implemented in TC-PRISMA correctly describes bcc Cr precipitation in the fcc Cu matrix.
    This is the framework for the aging simulations in Section 3.2; its accuracy depends on the nucleation barrier and the chosen interfacial energy.
  • domain assumption Solid solution (Fleischer) and precipitation (Orowan) strengthening contributions are additive and correctly describe the yield strength of the alloy.
    Used in Section 3.3 and Figure 5 to combine the two mechanisms; no experimental yield strength data for radiopure CuCr is available to verify this additivity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Design of high-strength, radiopure copper-chromium alloys for rare-event searches assisted by computational thermodynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QGCUWTZG

@misc{pith2026250623231,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Design of high-strength, radiopure copper-chromium alloys for rare-event searches assisted by computational thermodynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QGCUWTZG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.23231}
}
read the original abstract

Direct Dark Matter detection and studies on the nature of neutrinos demand detector systems with extremely low background levels, including from radioactivity. Additive-free, electroformed copper, in addition to a set of advantages, exhibits exceptional radiopurity, making it the material of choice for rare-event searches. To satisfy the increasing demand for materials with superior mechanical strength, the development of copper-chromium alloys is pursued. Early investigations explored the synthesis of these alloys by electrodeposition and thermal processing. A materials-design approach is proposed to optimize the fabrication and thermal processing stages of manufacturing. It is assisted by materials modeling tools based on the thermodynamic and kinetic properties of alloy compositions, which enables faster development of novel materials by predicting properties and materials performance. This approach is demonstrated by comparing simulations with previously reported experimental investigations and proposing improved thermal processing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.23231 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of grid points in the DICTRA setup for 400 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Cr concentration profiles of 400 µm Cu in contact with (a) 1 µm Cr and (b) 10 µm Cr, using 1D DICTRA simulations for 24 hours. Experimental data corresponding to solution heat treatment, with aging at 500◦C is included [19] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Cr concentration profile of 400 µm Cu in contact with 1 µm Cr at 1025◦C. Experimental data for 24 hours isothermal, with aging at 500◦C is included [19]. The grid is set-up in a planar geometry. For the Cu region 400 geometric grid points of initial 100% Cu concentration are selected such that the density is highest toward the interface with the Cr region. For the Cr region, in the 1 µm layer case, 50 linear grid po… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Results of simulations of aging Cu-0.5Cr at 400 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Predictions for temporal evolution of yield strength due to (a) solid solution stengthening, (b) precipitation strength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Calculation of TTT diagram for Cu-0.5Cr for 0.01 and 0.6 volume fraction % using TCHEA6 and MOBHEA3. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [19]

    Vitale, et al., A preliminary investigation into the electrodeposition and synthesis of radiopure Copper–Chromium alloys for rare-event physics detector systems, Nucl

    A. Vitale, et al., A preliminary investigation into the electrodeposition and synthesis of radiopure Copper–Chromium alloys for rare-event physics detector systems, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1003 (2021) 165291. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2021.165291

    arXiv 2021

  2. [10]

    Huang, et al., Mechanism investigation on high-performance Cu-Cr-Ti alloy via integrated computational materials engineering, Materials Today Communications 27 (2021) 102378

    Z. Huang, et al., Mechanism investigation on high-performance Cu-Cr-Ti alloy via integrated computational materials engineering, Materials Today Communications 27 (2021) 102378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102378

    arXiv 2021

  3. [1]

    Planck Collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6, [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]. doi:https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 2020

  4. [2]

    Billard, et al., Direct detection of dark matter—APPEC committee report*, Rept

    J. Billard, et al., Direct detection of dark matter—APPEC committee report*, Rept. Prog. Phys. 85 (5) (2022) 056201. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac5754

    doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac5754 2022

  5. [3]

    M. J. Dolinski, A. W. P. Poon, W. Rodejohann, Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay: Status and Prospects, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69 (2019) 219–251. doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101918-023407

    doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101918-023407 2019

  6. [4]

    MAJORANA Collaboration, The Majorana Demonstrator radioassay program, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 828 (2016) 22. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2016.04.070

    doi:10.1016/j.nima.2016.04.070 2016

  7. [5]

    NEWS-G Collaboration, Copper electroplating for background suppression in the NEWS-G experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 988 (2021) 164844. arXiv:2008.03153, doi:10.1016/j.nima.2020.164844

    arXiv 2021

  8. [6]

    Knights, Status and future prospects of the NEWS-G experiment, SciPost Physics Proceedings (12) (2023) 024

    P. Knights, Status and future prospects of the NEWS-G experiment, SciPost Physics Proceedings (12) (2023) 024

    work page 2023

Show all 46 references
  1. [7]

    Borjabad, et al., Copper electroforming service at Laboratorio Subterr´ aneo de Canfranc, AIP Conf

    S. Borjabad, et al., Copper electroforming service at Laboratorio Subterr´ aneo de Canfranc, AIP Conf. Proc. 1921 (2018) 020001. doi:10.1063/1.5018987

    2018 doi

  2. [8]

    Zhang, et al., Review of nano-phase effects in high strength and conductivity copper alloys, Nanotechnology Reviews 8 (1) (2019) 383

    X. Zhang, et al., Review of nano-phase effects in high strength and conductivity copper alloys, Nanotechnology Reviews 8 (1) (2019) 383

    2019

  3. [9]

    Yang, et al., Recent development of advanced precipitation-strengthened Cu alloys with high strength and conductivity: a review, Progress in Materials Science 138 (2023) 101141

    K. Yang, et al., Recent development of advanced precipitation-strengthened Cu alloys with high strength and conductivity: a review, Progress in Materials Science 138 (2023) 101141

    2023

  4. [11]

    Peng, X.-M

    L.-M. Peng, X.-M. Mao, K.-D. Xu, W.-J. Ding, Property and thermal stability of in situ composite Cu–Cr alloy contact cable, Journal of materials processing technology 166 (2) (2005) 193

    2005

  5. [12]

    Yuan, et al., Microstructure evolution and properties of Cu-Cr alloy during continuous extrusion process, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 703 (2017) 454

    Y. Yuan, et al., Microstructure evolution and properties of Cu-Cr alloy during continuous extrusion process, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 703 (2017) 454

    2017

  6. [13]

    S. Xu, H. Fu, Y. Wang, J. Xie, Effect of Ag addition on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Cu-Cr alloy, Materials Science and Engineering: A 726 (2018) 208–214. 10

    2018

  7. [14]

    NEWS-G Collaboration, Exploring light dark matter with the DarkSPHERE spherical proportional counter electroformed underground at the Boulby Underground Laboratory, Phys. Rev. D 108 (11) (2023) 112006. arXiv:2301.05183, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.112006

    2023 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Knights, K

    P. Knights, K. Nikolopoulos, Searches for light Dark Matter with Spherical Proportional Counters (2 2025). arXiv: 2502.11870, doi:10.31526/JAIS.2025.548

    2025 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Adhikari, et al., nEXO: neutrinoless double beta decay search beyond 10 28 year half-life sensitivity, J

    G. Adhikari, et al., nEXO: neutrinoless double beta decay search beyond 10 28 year half-life sensitivity, J. Phys. G 49 (1) (2022) 015104. doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ac3631

    2022 doi

  10. [17]

    Spathara, P

    D. Spathara, P. Knights, K. Nikolopoulos, Synthesis of high-strength, radiopure, electroformed copper-based alloys for rare-event searches: A materials design perspective (7 2025). arXiv:2507.00799

    2025

  11. [18]

    A. M. Suriano, et al., Developing radiopure copper alloys for high strength low background applications, AIP Conf. Proc. 1921 (1) (2018) 080001. doi:10.1063/1.5019009

    2018 doi

  12. [20]

    N. R. Overman, C. T. Overman, T. A. Kafentzis, D. J. Edwards, E. W. Hoppe, Majorana Electroformed Copper Mechanical Analysis, Tech. rep., Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, W A (United States) (04 2012). doi:10.2172/ 1039850. URL https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1039850

    2012

  13. [21]

    K. Zeng, M. H¨ am¨ al¨ ainen, Thermodynamic analysis of stable and metastable equilibria in the Cu-Cr system, Calphad 19 (1) (1995) 93–104

    1995

  14. [22]

    K. T. Jacob, S. Priya, Y. Waseda, A thermodynamic study of liquid Cu-Cr alloys and metastable liquid immiscibility, International Journal of Materials Research 91 (7) (2000) 594–600

    2000

  15. [23]

    Turchanin, Phase equilibria and thermodynamics of binary copper systems with 3 d-metals

    M. Turchanin, Phase equilibria and thermodynamics of binary copper systems with 3 d-metals. iii. copper-chromium system, Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics 45 (2006) 457–467

    2006

  16. [24]

    Y. Tang, Q. Chen, A. Engstr¨ om, Kinetic simulations of diffusion-controlled phase transformations in Cu-based alloys, Diffusion Foundations 15 (2018) 1–22

    2018

  17. [25]

    N. R. Council, D. on Engineering, P. Sciences, N. M. A. Board, C. on Integrated Computational Materials Engineering, Integrated computational materials engineering: a transformational discipline for improved competitiveness and national security, National Academies Press, 2008

    2008

  18. [26]

    X.-G. Lu, Z. Wang, Y. Cui, Z. Jin, Computational thermodynamics, computational kinetics, and materials design, Chinese science bulletin 59 (2014) 1662–1671

    2014

  19. [27]

    A. A. Luo, Material design and development: From classical thermodynamics to CALPHAD and ICME approaches, Calphad 50 (2015) 6–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2015.04.002

    2015 doi

  20. [28]

    J. J. de Pablo, et al., New frontiers for the materials genome initiative, npj Computational Materials 5 (1) (2019) 41

    2019

  21. [29]

    Li, et al., CALPHAD as a powerful technique for design and fabrication of thermoelectric materials, Journal of Materials Chemistry A 9 (11) (2021) 6634–6649

    X. Li, et al., CALPHAD as a powerful technique for design and fabrication of thermoelectric materials, Journal of Materials Chemistry A 9 (11) (2021) 6634–6649

    2021

  22. [30]

    Lukas, S

    H. Lukas, S. G. Fries, B. Sundman, Computational thermodynamics: the Calphad method, Cambridge university press, 2007

    2007

  23. [31]

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2007.10.001

    A brief history of CALPHAD, Calphad 32 (1) (2008) 1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2007.10.001

    2008 doi

  24. [32]

    U. R. Kattner, The CALPHAD method and its role in material and process development, Tecnologia em metalurgia, materiais e mineracao 13 (1) (2016) 3

    2016

  25. [33]

    URL https://thermocalc.com/products/databases/high-entropy-alloys

    Thermo-Calc Software, High entropy alloys databases (2023). URL https://thermocalc.com/products/databases/high-entropy-alloys

    2023

  26. [34]

    URL https://www.engineering-eye.com/THERMOCALC/details/db/pdf/thermo-calc/2022b/TCHEA6_technical_info

    Thermo-Calc Software, TCS High Entropy Alloys Database (TCHEA6) (2023). URL https://www.engineering-eye.com/THERMOCALC/details/db/pdf/thermo-calc/2022b/TCHEA6_technical_info. pdf

    2023

  27. [35]

    Andersson, T

    J.-O. Andersson, T. Helander, L. H¨ oglund, P. Shi, B. Sundman, Thermo-Calc & DICTRA, computational tools for materials science, Calphad 26 (2) (2002) 273

    2002

  28. [36]

    Andersson, J

    J.-O. Andersson, J. ˚Agren, Models for numerical treatment of multicomponent diffusion in simple phases, Journal of applied physics 72 (4) (1992) 1350–1355

    1992

  29. [37]

    Spathara, D

    D. Spathara, D. Putman, N. Warnken, Study into the role of nickel vapor on surface modification of a third-generation single-crystal superalloy, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 49 (2018) 4301–4307

    2018

  30. [38]

    J. S. Langer, A. J. Schwartz, Kinetics of nucleation in near-critical fluids, Physical Review A 21 (3) (1980) 948

    1980

  31. [39]

    Wagner, R

    R. Wagner, R. Kampmann, P. Voorhees, G. Kostorz, Homogeneous Second Phase Precipitation: Phase Transformations in Materials Science and Technology (2001)

    2001

  32. [40]

    Q. Chen, J. Jeppsson, J. ˚Agren, Analytical treatment of diffusion during precipitate growth in multicomponent systems, Acta materialia 56 (8) (2008) 1890–1896

    2008

  33. [41]

    Gottstein, Physikalische grundlagen der materialkunde, Springer-Verlag, 2013

    G. Gottstein, Physikalische grundlagen der materialkunde, Springer-Verlag, 2013

    2013

  34. [42]

    Freudenberger, et al., Non-destructive pulsed field CuAg-solenoids, Materials Science and Engineering: A 527 (7-8) (2010) 2004–2013

    J. Freudenberger, et al., Non-destructive pulsed field CuAg-solenoids, Materials Science and Engineering: A 527 (7-8) (2010) 2004–2013

    2010

  35. [43]

    J. W. Martin, Precipitation hardening: theory and applications, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2012

    2012

  36. [44]

    L. B. Freund, S. Suresh, Thin film materials: stress, defect formation and surface evolution, Cambridge university press, 2004

    2004

  37. [45]

    URL https://thermocalc.com/products/databases/copper-based-alloys

    Thermo-Calc Software, Copper-based Alloys Databases (2023). URL https://thermocalc.com/products/databases/copper-based-alloys

    2023

  38. [46]

    11 URL https://www.engineering-eye.com/THERMOCALC/features/pdf/TCCU3_extended_info.pdf 12

    Thermo-Calc Software, TCCU3: TCS Cu-based Alloys Database (2023). 11 URL https://www.engineering-eye.com/THERMOCALC/features/pdf/TCCU3_extended_info.pdf 12

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.