Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Spin polarization driven by molecular vibrations leads to enantioselectivity in chiral molecules

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Molecular vibrations, not electric current, are the source of spin polarization in chirality-induced spin selectivity, coupled to a ferromagnet through an RKKY-like magnetic interaction.

desk verdict Fresh experiment, unverified linchpin: the vibration-driven spin polarization claim rests on an expected but never computed half-period asymmetry. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.03082 v1 pith:QJNTLWJA submitted 2024-12-04 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Shinji Miwa , Tatsuya Yamamoto , Takashi Nagata , Shoya Sakamoto , Kenta Kimura , Masanobu Shiga , Weiguang Gao , Hiroshi M. Yamamoto
show 4 more authors
Keiichi Inoue Taishi Takenobu Takayuki Nozaki Tatsuhiko Ohto
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall
keywords chirality-inducedspinselectivityCISSmolecularvibrationpolarizationmagnetoconductanceRKKYinteractioncamphor-10-sulfonicacidenantioselectivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to overturn the standard story of chirality-induced spin selectivity (CISS), which holds that electrons traversing a chiral molecule become spin-polarized by the current. The authors argue instead that molecular vibrations of the chiral molecule itself generate the spin polarization, and the electric current merely probes a magnetic interaction between the molecule and a ferromagnetic electrode. They support this with electrochemical magnetoconductance measurements on camphor-10-sulfonic acid on CoPt/Au electrodes, where the magnetoresistance oscillates with Au thickness as expected for RKKY-mediated interlayer exchange coupling and disappears at zero magnetic field. First-principles calculations show that a C=O stretching vibration flips the molecule's spin density each half-cycle, and the paper assumes that an applied magnetic field makes the two half-cycles unequal in duration, yielding a net, handedness-dependent spin polarization. If correct, the work reinterprets magnetoresistance and enantiomer separation as consequences of vibration-driven spin polarization rather than current-induced spin effects.

What carries the argument

The central object is dS/dt, the time derivative of spin angular momentum generated by a molecular vibrational mode, specifically the 1770 cm−1 C=O stretching mode of the chiral electrolyte. This mode's spin density reverses sign with displacement direction, and the authors invoke vibrational angular momentum and spin-vibration coupling to argue that, under a magnetic field, the two half-periods tau+ and tau− become unequal, so the time average of dS/dt no longer cancels and its sign is determined by molecular handedness. This vibration-driven spin polarization then couples to the ferromagnetic CoPt electrode through the Au spacer via RKKY indirect exchange, producing the observed oscillatory magnetoconductance.

What would settle it

Measure or compute the half-period ratio tau+/tau- for the 1770 cm−1 camphor-10-sulfonic acid mode under a 0.6 T magnetic field, together with the field-dependent dS/dt; if tau+ equals tau- for both enantiomers, the vibration-driven net spin polarization is zero. Alternatively, detect the predicted bias-current-free spin polarization directly, for instance by looking for a magnetization-dependent adsorption or diffusion change of CSA at zero electrochemical current, and check whether it follows the same chirality and field rules.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the essence of CISS lies in a magnetic interaction between chiral molecules and a ferromagnetic electrode, analogous to interlayer exchange coupling and mediated by conduction electrons through the RKKY interaction. Chiral molecules such as camphor-10-sulfonic acid acquire a chirality-dependent spin polarization from molecular vibration under an applied magnetic field, not from electric current, and this polarization couples magnetically to the ferromagnet. The electric current acts only as a probe of the resulting magnetization-dependent molecular concentration near the electrode. The experimental signature is a magnetoconductance oscillation with Au spacer thickness, and the theoretical signature is a vibration-induced time derivative of spin angular momentum whose time-averaged sign is set by molecular handedness once half-period asymmetry is assumed.

Load-bearing premise

The mechanism works only if a magnetic field makes the outward and return halves of a chiral molecule's vibration take unequal times, an asymmetry the paper expects from spin-vibration coupling but does not itself compute or measure; if the halves are equal, the vibration-driven spin polarization averages to zero and the mechanism fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If this mechanism is correct, the electric current in CISS junctions is not the source of spin polarization; it is only a probe, so CISS phenomena should appear even without a bias current.
  • The magnetoconductance across a chiral-molecule/ferromagnet junction should oscillate with the thickness of an intervening nonmagnetic spacer, with a period set by the RKKY wavelength, as observed for Au.
  • Enantiomer separation on magnetic substrates can be redescribed as an equilibrium magnetic interaction between the ferromagnet and the molecule's vibration-driven spin polarization, rather than a transient current effect.
  • Because the mechanism relies on spin-vibration coupling and vibrational angular momentum, the effect should grow with temperature and should depend on which vibrational modes couple most strongly to molecular chirality.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The authors' half-period asymmetry (tau+ != tau-) is invoked rather than demonstrated; a direct first-principles calculation or molecular-dynamics simulation of tau+ and tau- under a magnetic field would turn the qualitative picture into a quantitative prediction.
  • A natural testable extension is isotope substitution: replacing atoms in the C=O stretch should shift the vibration frequency and alter the magnetoconductance effect's magnitude or sign, directly linking the effect to the specific vibrational mode.
  • The same vibration-driven spin polarization mechanism may unify other bias-current-free CISS observations, such as thermally driven spin polarization and magnetic passivation, although the paper does not model those systems directly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports magnetoconductance (MC) experiments on an electrochemical cell with CoPt/Au electrodes and the chiral electrolyte camphor-10-sulfonic acid (CSA). The experiments show a chirality-dependent MC effect that changes sign between (S)- and (R)-CSA, an MC ratio that grows with electrode size, an oscillatory dependence on Au spacer thickness, and a vanishing of the effect when the field is removed after saturation. The authors interpret these observations as evidence that molecular vibrations of chiral molecules, under an applied magnetic field, generate a net spin polarization that couples to the ferromagnet through an RKKY-like interaction, with the electric current serving only as a probe. They support this interpretation with DFT calculations that show opposite spin-density responses for opposite vibrational displacements of a chosen C=O stretching mode, but the crucial step—an assumed inequality of the half-periods of these displacements in a magnetic field—is asserted rather than derived.

Significance. If the proposed mechanism is correct, it would constitute a paradigm shift in the understanding of CISS, explaining bias-current-free phenomena and connecting them to vibration-driven spin polarization. The experiments are carefully designed: the zero-field control, the electrode-size dependence, and the use of a corrosion-resistant CoPt/Au electrode are commendable. The DFT calculations include spin-orbit coupling and identify a specific vibrational mode, but they do not constitute a quantitative theory. Because the central mechanism rests on an unverified half-period asymmetry, the paper's main claim is not established; the experimental findings, however, are interesting and worth reporting if the theory is either computed or explicitly framed as a hypothesis.

major comments (3)
  1. [Theoretical studies (near Fig. 3) and Discussion] The proposed mechanism relies on the inequality of the half-periods τ+ and τ− of a molecular vibration in a magnetic field, but this inequality is never derived, computed, or estimated. The text states 'we expected differences in the half periods τ+ and τ−' (p. 11, near Fig. 3) and the Discussion repeats that 'the half-periods for these vibrations differ,' citing vibrational angular momentum and spin-vibration coupling. No Hamiltonian, symmetry analysis, or order-of-magnitude calculation is provided. With τ+ = τ−, the authors themselves concede that the dS/dt maps in Fig. 3 have zero time integral, so the vibration-driven spin polarization, the RKKY interaction, and the entire theoretical explanation collapse without this assumption. This is a load-bearing gap that must be filled.
  2. [Methods / First-principles calculation] The DFT calculations create spin density in the closed-shell CSA molecule by adding 0.1 electrons, an ad hoc procedure that is not justified by any model of the electrochemical interface. The sign and magnitude of the computed spin-density response to vibration are therefore dependent on this input parameter; the calculation does not predict the spin polarization from the molecule's electronic structure alone. A self-consistent treatment of charge transfer between CSA and the CoPt/Au electrode, or at least a rigorous justification of the electron count, is needed to support the claim that molecular vibrations produce the required spin polarization.
  3. [Fig. 2d / Time-resolved MC measurements] The identification of an RKKY-like oscillation in the MC ratio versus Au thickness in Fig. 2d is based on only a small number of data points and a dashed 'guide to the eye.' No quantitative fit to the expected RKKY period of ~1.8–2 nm is presented, and no error bars or repeated-sample statistics are shown. The oscillatory behavior is central to the conclusion that the interaction is the interlayer-exchange-coupling analog, so this evidence is weaker than the narrative suggests.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Methods] The equation numbering in the Methods section is inconsistent: a second equation is labelled (iv) after the overlap-matrix equation already labelled (iv) (p. 17).
  2. [References] References 15, 16, and 19 contain typos: 'Avar vari' should be 'Avvari', 'A theroy' should be 'A theory', and 'stcutrues' should be 'structures'.
  3. [Fig. 4c / Discussion] The chirality-independent spin polarization S (gray arrows) is described as not leading to CISS because 'it lacks an even function component'; this is unclear—please define what 'even function component' means in this context.
  4. [Fig. 2 / Time-resolved MC measurements] The time-resolved MC data in Fig. 2a are presented without error bars or indication of the number of independent measurements, so the statistical significance of the chirality dependence is not assessable.
  5. [Theoretical studies] The authors should clarify how τ+ and τ− are defined in a molecular vibration, and how they would in principle be measured or computed, even qualitatively, to make the proposed asymmetry a concrete prediction.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The theoretical prediction of vibration-driven spin polarization reduces to an assumed chirality-dependent half-period asymmetry that is nowhere computed.

  1. other [Theoretical studies on spin polarization in chiral molecules, paragraph following Fig. 3a-d discussion (main text, near the discussion of tau+ and tau-)]
    "However, given that the half periods, τ+ and τ−, are identical, it appears improbable that the CoPt/Au ferromagnetic electrode would magnetically interact with the CSA in a manner influenced by the electrode's spin polarization. ... Considering the molecular vibration, we expected differences in the half periods τ+ and τ− due to the magnetic field’s influence, which is corroborated by the spin–vibration coupling and vibrational angular momentum. ..."

    The DFT results in Fig. 3 show that the spin-density response has opposite signs for + and − displacements. For equal half-periods, the period-averaged spin polarization is therefore zero, as the paper explicitly acknowledges. The nonzero, chirality-dependent result is introduced by assuming τ+ ≠ τ− with a chirality-dependent sign, namely τ− > τ+ for (S)-CSA and the opposite expectation for (R)-CSA. That assumption is not derived from the first-principles calculation, not measured, and not even estimated; it is exactly the chirality-dependent vibration-driven spin polarization that the paper claims to predict.

full rationale

The experimental part of the paper, including the time-resolved magnetoconductance measurements, the chirality sign reversal, and the Au-thickness oscillation, contains independent observations and is not circular. The circularity is confined to the theoretical mechanism: the claimed first-principles support for molecular-vibration-driven spin polarization depends on an uncomputed, chirality-dependent half-period asymmetry. The DFT calculation alone gives equal and opposite contributions that cancel in time average, and the nonzero effect is obtained only by positing τ+ ≠ τ− with signs chosen to match the desired enantioselectivity. Because this assumption is the load-bearing content of the proposed explanation, the theoretical prediction is equivalent to its input. The self-citations to prior bias-current-free CISS work are contextual and are not load-bearing for this central derivation. A score of 6 rather than a higher one reflects that the experimental MC data and the DFT spin-density response are nontrivial and independent, but the mechanism's central prediction is not independently derived and would vanish if the assumed asymmetry were absent.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central mechanism depends on a single ad hoc asymmetry (half-period difference) that is neither calculated nor measured, plus a selected vibrational mode and an arbitrary injected electron count. The experimental interpretation relies on assumed diffusion-coefficient changes and an RKKY analogy inferred from sparse data.

free parameters (3)
  • Added electrons to CSA molecule = 0.1 e
    Closed-shell CSA is doped with 0.1 electrons to induce spin density; the amount is arbitrary and may determine the magnitude and sign of the computed spin-density response.
  • Normal-mode displacement amplitude = ~0.1 Å
    Used for spin-vibration coupling calculations; the result is likely sensitive to the chosen amplitude.
  • Selected vibrational mode = C=O stretch at 1770 cm^-1
    Chosen as representative because it has the largest electron-vibration coupling; other modes are not considered in the main argument, introducing selection bias.
assumptions (3)
  • ad hoc to paper The external magnetic field creates a difference between tau+ and tau- for chiral molecular vibrations via spin-vibration coupling and vibrational angular momentum.
    This is the linchpin of the theoretical mechanism; it is expected but not derived from first principles or measured.
  • domain assumption The observed magnetoconductance changes arise from alterations in the diffusion coefficient of CSA near the electrode, not from other magnetic-field or electrochemical artifacts.
    The paper argues this from electrode-size dependence but presents no direct measurement of the diffusion coefficient.
  • domain assumption The oscillation of MC ratio with Au thickness indicates RKKY-like interlayer exchange coupling between CoPt and CSA.
    The comparison to Fe/Au/Fe is based on a few points and a guide-to-eye curve, not a quantitative fit.
invented entities (1)
  • Effective half-period asymmetry (tau+ != tau-) in chiral molecular vibration under magnetic field
    purpose: To produce a net chirality-dependent spin polarization despite the time-symmetric dS/dt from static displacements.
    No direct measurement or quantitative derivation is provided; it is invoked to convert time-symmetric spin-density oscillations into a net polarization.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spin polarization driven by molecular vibrations leads to enantioselectivity in chiral molecules." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QJNTLWJA

@misc{pith2026241203082,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spin polarization driven by molecular vibrations leads to enantioselectivity in chiral molecules},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QJNTLWJA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.03082}
}
read the original abstract

Chirality pervades multiple scientific domains-physics, chemistry, biology, and astronomy-and profoundly influences their foundational principles. Recently, the chirality-induced spin selectivity (CISS) phenomenon has captured significant attention in physical chemistry due to its potential applications and intriguing underlying physics. Despite its prominence, the microscopic mechanisms of CISS remain hotly debated, hindering practical applications and further theoretical advancements. Here we challenge the established view that attributes CISS-related phenomena to current-induced spin polarization and electron transport across interfaces. We propose that molecular vibrations in chiral molecules primarily drive spin polarization, thereby governing CISS. Employing an electrochemical cell paired with a precisely engineered magnetic multilayer, we demonstrate that the magnetic interactions akin to interlayer exchange coupling are crucial for CISS. Our theoretical study suggests that molecular vibrations facilitate chirality-dependent spin polarization, which plays a pivotal role in CISS-related phenomena such as magnetoresistance and enantiomer separation using ferromagnets. These findings necessitate a paradigm shift in the design and analysis of systems in various scientific fields, extending the role of spin dynamics from traditional areas such as solid-state physics to chemical reactions, molecular biology, and even drug discovery.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Orbital Angular Momentum Textures and Currents in a Discrete Helix: Equilibrium and Linear Response

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A three-orbital tight-binding model of a single helical chain shows chirality generates orbital angular momentum textures and an orbital Edelstein response, enabling stronger spin polarization via orbital-to-spin conv...

  2. Theory of spin Seebeck effect activated by acoustic chiral phonons

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper derives a microscopic formula for a phonon-driven spin Seebeck effect in chiral insulator/normal metal junctions, grounded in gyromagnetic coupling.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    On the relationships between the crystalline form, chemical composition and the direction of optical rotation

    Pasteur, L. On the relationships between the crystalline form, chemical composition and the direction of optical rotation. Ann. Chim. Phys. 24, 442-459 (1848)

    work page

  2. [2]

    The Ambidextrous Universe: Mirror Asymmetry and Time -Reversal Worlds (Penguin Books, 1964)

    Gardner, M. The Ambidextrous Universe: Mirror Asymmetry and Time -Reversal Worlds (Penguin Books, 1964)

    work page 1964

  3. [3]

    & Waldeck, D

    Naaman, R., Paltiel, Y . & Waldeck, D. H. Chiral molecules and the electron spin. Nat. Rev. Chem. 3, 250-260 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Naaman, R., Paltiel, Y & Waldeck, D. H. Chiral molecules and the spin selectivity effect. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 3660-3666 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    & Parkin, S

    Yang, S.-H., Naaman, R., Paltiel, Y . & Parkin, S. S. P. Chiral spintronics. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 328-343 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    P., Waldeck, D

    Ray, K., Ananthavel, S. P., Waldeck, D. H. & Naaman, R. Asymmetric scattering of polarized electrons by organized organic films of chiral molecules. Science 283, 814-816 (1999)

    work page 1999

  7. [7]

    Gӧhler, B. et al. Spin selectivity in electron transmission through self -assembled monolayers of double-stranded DNA. Science 331, 894-897 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Xie, Z. et al. Spin specific electron conduction through DNA oligomers. Nano Lett. 11, 4652-4655 (2011)

    work page 2011

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Banerjee-Gshosh, K. et al. Separation of enantiomers by their enentiospecific interaction with achiral magnetic substrates. Science 360, 1331-1334 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Qian, Q. et al. Chiral molecular intercalation superlattices. Nature 606, 902-908 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Nakajima, R. et al. Giant spin polarization and a pair of antiparalle spins in a chiral superconductor. Nature 613, 479-484 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    A., Finkelstein -Shapiro, D., Berche, B

    Medina, E., González -Arraga, L. A., Finkelstein -Shapiro, D., Berche, B. & Mujica, V . Continuum model for chiral induced spin selectivity in helical molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 20 142, 194308 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    & Hedegård, P

    Dalum, S. & Hedegård, P. Theory of chiral induced spin selectivity. Nano Lett. 19, 5253- 5259 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Yang, X., van der Wal, C. H. & van Wees, B. J. Spin-dependent electron transmission model for chiral molecules in mesoscopic devices. Phys. Rev. B 99, 024418 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    Rikken, G. L. J. A. & Avar vari, N. Comparing electrical magnetochiral anisotropy and chirality-induced spin selectivity. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14, 9727-9731 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Ruderman, M. A. & Kittel. C. Indirect exchange coupling of nuclear magnetic moments by conduction electrons. Phys. Rev. 96, 99-1012 (1954)

    1954

  9. [17]

    A theroy of metallic ferro - and antiferromagnetism on Zener’s model

    Kasuya T. A theroy of metallic ferro - and antiferromagnetism on Zener’s model. Prog. Theor. Phys. 16, 45-57 (1956)

    1956

  10. [18]

    Magnetic properties of Cu-Mn alloys

    Yosida, K. Magnetic properties of Cu-Mn alloys. Phys. Rev. 106, 893-898 (1957)

    1957

  11. [19]

    Grünberg, P., Schreiber, R., Pang, Y ., Brodsky, M. B. & Sowers, H. Layered magnetic stcutrues: Evidence for antiferromagntic coupling of Fe layers across Cr interlayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2442-2445 (1986)

    1986

  12. [20]

    & Yamamot o, H

    Kishine, J., Kusunose, H. & Yamamot o, H. M. On the definition of chirality and enantioselective fields. Isr. J. Chem. 62, e202200049 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Barron, L. D. True and false chirality and absolute asymmetric synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 108, 5539-5542 (1986)

    1986

  14. [22]

    Rikken, G. L. J. A. & Fӧlling, J. & Wyder P. Electrical magnetochiral anisotropy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 236602 (2001)

    2001

  15. [23]

    Kulkarni, C. et al. Highly efficient and tunable filtering of electrons’ spin by supramoleuclar chirality of nanofiber-based materials. Adv. Mater. 32, 1904965 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Bian, Z. et al. Chiral van der Waals superlattices for enhanced spin-selective transport and spin-dependent electrocatalytic performance. Adv. Mater. 35, 2306061 (2023). 21

    2023

  17. [25]

    Parkin, S. S. P. et al. Giant tunneling magnetoresistance at room temperature with MgO (100) tunnel barriers. Nat. Mater. 3, 862-867 (2004)

    2004

  18. [26]

    Fukushima, A., Suzuki, Y

    Yuasa, S., Nagahama, T. Fukushima, A., Suzuki, Y . & Ando, K. Giant room-temperature magnetoresistanec in single-crystal Fe/MgO/Fe magnetic tunnel junctions. Nat. Mater. 3, 868-871 (2004)

    2004

  19. [27]

    Djayaprawira, D. D. et al. 230% room -temperature magnetoresistance in CoFeB/MgO/CoFeB magntic tunnel junctions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 092502 (2005)

    2005

  20. [28]

    Meirzada, I. et al. Long -time-scale magnetization ordering induced by an adsorbed chiral monolayer on ferromagnets. ACS Nano 15, 5574-5579 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    J., Filip, A

    Jedema, F. J., Filip, A. T. & van Wees, B. J. Electrical spin injection and accumulation at room temperature in an all-metal mesoscopic spin valve. Nature 410, 345-348 (2001)

    2001

  22. [30]

    Metzger, T. S. et al. The electron spin as a chiral reagent. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 1653- 1658 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Charge redistribution and spin polarization driven by correlation induced electron exchange in chiral molecules

    Fransson, J. Charge redistribution and spin polarization driven by correlation induced electron exchange in chiral molecules. Nano Lett. 21, 3026-3032 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    Kondou, K. et al. Chirality -induced magnetoresistance due to thermally driven spin polarization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 7302-7307 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    & Miyajima, D

    Kondou, K., Miwa, S. & Miyajima, D. Spontaneous spin selectivity in chiral molecules at the interface. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 585, 171157 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Miwa, S. et al. Chirality-induced effective magnetic field in a phthalocyanine molecule. Appl. Phys. Express 13, 113001 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Sukenik, N. et al. Correlation between ferromagnetic layer easy axis and the tilt angle of self assembled chiral moleucles. Molecules 25, 6036 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Goren, N. et al. Magnetic passivation using chiral molecules. Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 172401 (2021). 22

    2021

  29. [37]

    K., Tassinari, F., Naaman., R

    Das, T. K., Tassinari, F., Naaman., R. & Fransson, J. Temperature-dependent chiral-induced spin selectivity effect: experiments and theory. J. Phys. Chem. C 126, 3257-3264 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    Chirality -induced spin selectivity: The role of electron correlations

    Fransson, J. Chirality -induced spin selectivity: The role of electron correlations. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 7126-7132 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    Vibrational origin of exchange splitting and chiral-induced spin selectivity

    Fransson, J. Vibrational origin of exchange splitting and chiral-induced spin selectivity. Phys. Rev. B 102, 235416 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Vittmann, C., Lim, J ., Tamascelli, D., Huelga, S. F. & Plenio, M. B. Spin -dependent momentum conservation of electron-phonon scattering in chiraliy-induced spin selectivity. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14, 340-346 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Cottrell, F. G. Residual current in galvanic polarization, regarded as a diffusion problem. Z. Phys. Chem. 42, 385-431 (1903)

    1903

  34. [42]

    Short- and long period oscillatioins in the exchang coupling of Fe across epitaxially grown Al - and Au-interlayers

    Fuβ, A., Demokritov, S., Grünberg, & Zinn, W. Short- and long period oscillatioins in the exchang coupling of Fe across epitaxially grown Al - and Au-interlayers. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 103, L221-L227 (1992)

    1992

  35. [43]

    & Chappert, C

    Bruno, P. & Chappert, C. Ruderman -Kittel of oscillatory interlayer exchange coupling. Phys. Rev. B 46, 261-270 (1992)

    1992

  36. [44]

    Magnetic -field dependent phonon states in paramagnetic CeF 3

    Schaack, G. Magnetic -field dependent phonon states in paramagnetic CeF 3. Solid State Commun. 17, 505-509 (1975)

    1975

  37. [45]

    & Niu, Q

    Zhang, L. & Niu, Q. Angular momentum of phonons and the Einstein-de Haas effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 085503 (2014)

    2014

  38. [46]

    Huang, P.-H. et al. Chirality-dependent circular photogalvanic effect in enantiomorphic 2D organic-inorganic hybrid perovskites. Adv. Mater. 33, 2008611 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    C., Fontanesi, C., Waldeck, D

    Mondal, P. C., Fontanesi, C., Waldeck, D. H. & Naaman, R. Spin -dependent transport through chiral molecules studied by spin-dependent electrochemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 2560-2568 (2016). 23

    2016

  40. [48]

    Kubota, H., Fukushima, A

    Yakushiji, K. Kubota, H., Fukushima, A. & Yuasa, S. Perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions with strong antiferromagnetic interlayer exchange coupling at first oscillation peak. Appl. Phys. Express 8, 083003 (2015)

    2015

  41. [49]

    & Hafner, J

    Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Norm-conserving and ultrasoft pseudopotentials for first -low row and transition elements. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 6, 8245 (1994)

    1994

  42. [50]

    Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  43. [51]

    P, Burke, K

    Pedrew, J. P, Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1396 (1997)

    1997

  44. [52]

    Soler, J. M. et al., The SIESTA method for ab initio order-N materials simulation. J. Phsy.: Condens. Matter. 14, 2745 (2002)

    2002

  45. [53]

    Yamashita, K., Nakamura, H

    Ohto, T., Rungger, I. Yamashita, K., Nakamura, H. & Sanvito, S. Ab initio theory for current-induced molecular switching: Melamine on Cu(001). Phys. Rev. B 87, 205439 (2013)

    2013

  46. [54]

    Gaussian 16, Revision C.02, Frisch, M. J. et al., Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, 2016

    2016

  47. [55]

    Vibrational circular dichroism spectroscopy of chiral molecular crystals: Insights from theory

    Jähnigen, S. Vibrational circular dichroism spectroscopy of chiral molecular crystals: Insights from theory. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202303595 (2023). 24 Acknowledgements We thank Sachiko Kamisaka and Yukiko Kato of The University of Tokyo for their assistance. We also than...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.