Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Quasinormal modes of nonthermal fixed points

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Perturbations of a nonthermal fixed point decay through a tower of power-law quasinormal modes.

desk verdict New, clean framework for quasinormal modes of nonthermal fixed points, but the concrete FP spectrum rests on a regularization choice the authors only partially justify; worth a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.01622 v1 pith:QRPXA4TZ submitted 2025-02-03 hep-th cond-mat.quant-gasgr-qchep-phnucl-th

Matisse De Lescluze , Michal P. Heller This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thcond-mat.quant-gasgr-qchep-phnucl-th
keywords nonthermalfixedpointsquasinormalmodesFokker-Planckkinetictheoryself-similarscalingBoltzmannequationpower-lawrelaxationthermalizationprescaling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes that the approach to a nonthermal fixed point—a transient attractor in which the distribution function factorizes as $f(t,p)=A(t)f_s(B(t)p)$—is organized by a discrete spectrum of quasinormal modes, complex eigenfrequencies whose imaginary parts set decay rates, in the same spirit as black-hole ringdown. Its central claim is that a small perturbation of the self-similar scaling solution evolves as $\delta f(t,\bar p)=B(t)^{i\Omega}\delta f_\Omega(\bar p)$, with eigenfrequencies $\Omega$ fixed by a linearized eigenvalue problem around the scaling function. For the Fokker-Planck collision kernel with energy conservation the spectrum is a tower of purely imaginary frequencies, so each mode contributes a decaying power law in time; the least-damped mode sets the late-time approach. If correct, this gives a coupling-independent description of how overoccupied gluon plasmas and cold-atom gases lock onto self-similar cascades, and it explains the observed attractiveness of nonthermal fixed points. A byproduct is a precise determination of the scaling function, whose ultraviolet tail is Gaussian.

What carries the argument

The key object is the quasinormal-mode ansatz $\delta f(t,\bar p)=B(t)^{i\Omega}\delta f_\Omega(\bar p)$, inserted into the Boltzmann equation linearized around the nonthermal fixed point. This converts a time-dependent approach to self-similarity into a time-independent generalized eigenvalue problem, Eq. (10), whose eigenvalues $\Omega$ encode power-law decay when $\mathrm{Im}\,\Omega<0$ and logarithmic oscillations when $\mathrm{Re}\,\Omega\neq0$. The spectrum is obtained by Chebyshev pseudospectral discretization on a compact momentum grid, with the scaling function $f_s$ determined self-consistently from the Fokker-Planck kernel; conservation of energy is enforced through the $\delta\epsilon=0$ boundary condition, and an ultraviolet cutoff is included because perturbation eigenfunctions grow relative to $f_s$ at large momentum.

What would settle it

Solve the linearized eigenvalue problem (10) on successively finer grids with larger ultraviolet cutoffs but without imposing $\delta\epsilon=0$; if any mode with $\mathrm{Im}\,\Omega>0$ converges with a cutoff-independent eigenfunction carrying nonzero energy density, the attractor picture is wrong. Equivalently, an ab initio kinetic-theory simulation initialized close to the Fokker-Planck scaling solution should show late-time deviations in the static frame decaying as a sum of the predicted power laws, with the least-damped mode giving a decay $(t-t_*)^{4.29\beta}\approx (t-t_*)^{-0.61}$ for $\beta=-1/7$; a different late-time behavior would falsify the tower.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Equations (5) and (10) are the paper's main results. In the static frame of the scaling solution, defined by $\bar p=B(t)p$ and $A(t)^{-1}f(t,p)\approx f_s(\bar p)+\delta f(t,\bar p)$, any perturbation obeys $\delta f(t,\bar p)=B(t)^{i\Omega}\delta f_\Omega(\bar p)$, where $\Omega$ is an eigenvalue of the linearized Boltzmann operator. For the isotropic, homogeneous Fokker-Planck kernel with energy conservation ($\sigma=4$, $\beta=-1/7$), the computed spectrum consists of purely imaginary frequencies, approximately $\Omega\approx -4.29i$, $-6.49i$, $-7i$, $-8.59i$, with the $-7i$ mode following analytically from a shift of the time offset $t_*$. Because $\mathrm{Im}\,\Omega<0$, every mode decays as a power law in $t-t_*$, producing a tower of progressively more decaying contributions. The authors impose the boundary condition that perturbations carry no energy density, $\delta\epsilon=0$, which removes modes with positive imaginary part and makes the fixed point an attractor; they also identify a zero mode coming from a shift of the reference time $t_{\rm ref}$, the analogue of a variation of a thermodynamic variable in equilibrium.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the modes with positive imaginary part found numerically are artifacts that can be discarded by imposing $\delta\epsilon=0$ together with an ultraviolet cutoff; if those modes are physical, the nonthermal fixed point is not an attractor and the tower of decaying power laws does not govern the late-time approach.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At late times the approach to the nonthermal fixed point is a sum over power laws, with the least-damped mode dominating; the self-consistency condition $\mathrm{Re}(i\Omega)\beta<0$ is satisfied by the computed spectrum.
  • The eigenfrequencies are independent of the coupling constant at leading order, so the relaxation rates are fixed by the scaling exponents rather than by the interaction strength.
  • The two universal modes predicted from the symmetries of the scaling ansatz — $\Omega=i/\beta$ for a shift of $t_*$ and $\Omega=0$ for a shift of $t_{\rm ref}$ — appear in the numerical spectrum, with the zero mode removed by the $\delta\epsilon=0$ condition.
  • The scaling function for the Fokker-Planck kernel has a Gaussian ultraviolet tail $\propto \bar p\,e^{-\bar p^2/2}$, corroborated by ab initio kinetic-theory simulations, and is essentially insensitive to an ultraviolet cutoff once that tail is resolved.
  • If any mode had $\mathrm{Re}\,\Omega\neq0$, it would induce oscillations in $\log(t-t_*)$ in deviations from scaling; the energy-conserving Fokker-Planck case has none, while the toy particle-number-conserving cascade in the appendices does.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The coupling independence suggests the same power-law tower should appear in any homogeneous isotropic system governed by Fokker-Planck-type small-angle scattering, which makes the spectrum a target for cold-atom experiments that track deviations from scaling in the static frame.
  • The treatment of growing modes as numerical artifacts is a choice; if grid refinement ever produced a convergent eigenmode with $\mathrm{Im}\,\Omega>0$ and nonzero energy density, the nonthermal fixed point would be a saddle rather than an attractor, and only the transient wedge before the instability would be described by the tower.
  • The analogy with black-hole quasinormal modes invites transferring pseudospectrum and mode-sum techniques to this setting, which could quantify how robust the computed spectrum is to changing cutoffs, adding nonlinear corrections, or including the time dependence of the Coulomb logarithm.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper proposes that the approach to a nonthermal fixed point (NTFP) in kinetic theory can be described by a quasinormal-mode expansion. Writing f(t,p)=A(t)[fs(B(t)p)+δf(t,p̄)], the authors derive the linear eigenvalue problem in Eqs. (5) and (10) for perturbations of the form δf=B(t)^{iΩ}δf_Ω(p̄). They identify two universal modes: a shift in t* with Ω=i/β and a zero mode from rescaling t_ref, and they show how energy conservation constrains the allowed modes. For the overoccupied Fokker-Planck kernel with energy cascade (σ=4, β=−1/7), they compute the scaling function fs by a pseudospectral method, find a Gaussian UV tail, and solve the eigenvalue problem numerically on grids with a UV cut-off, reporting a tower of purely imaginary frequencies Ω≈−4.29i, −6.49i, −7i, −8.59i. They verify the analytic Ω=−7i mode and compare the zero-mode eigenfunction with numerics, and they include appendices on a particle-number-conserving cascade toy model.

Significance. If the central numerical claim is correct, the paper introduces a genuinely new diagnostic for the attractive nature of NTFPs and connects far-from-equilibrium kinetic theory with the well-developed quasinormal-mode toolkit of black-hole perturbation theory. The analytic derivation of the t* mode and the zero mode is clean and largely independent of the collision kernel, and the verification of the Ω=−7i mode is a strong internal consistency check. The self-consistent determination of the scaling function with a Gaussian tail corroborates earlier ab initio results [40], and the inclusion of a Mathematica notebook supporting the analytic solution in Appendix 2 is a reproducibility plus. The main reservation is that the reported damped tower—the quantitative centerpiece—rests on a finite cut-off and a boundary-condition selection whose validity is not yet demonstrated; if that selection is not robust, the physical claim of a power-law tower governing the approach to the NTFP remains unproven.

major comments (3)
  1. [Far from equilibrium QNMs spectrum; Appendix 4] The central numerical claim—the damped tower Ω≈−4.29i, −6.49i, −7i, −8.59i—rests on the finite-grid generalized eigenvalue problem with a UV cut-off and the condition δϵ=0. Appendix 4 (Fig. 7) shows that the full compact-grid spectrum contains an additional set of modes at every negative integer imaginary multiple, and these are discarded because δf_Ω/f_s diverges for large p. A finite cut-off changes the operator domain, so the surviving modes are selected by the boundary condition at p_UV rather than by the infinite-domain physics. The paper asserts robustness to the cut-off and grid size but does not quantify the convergence of Ω with p_UV, does not test alternative boundary conditions at p_UV (zero flux, or matching to the Gaussian tail of f_s), and does not explain the full-grid modes. If the surviving tower is an artifact of the regularization, the assertion that a power-law tower governs the approach to the NTFP is unsupported. I request convergence data over a sequence of cut-offs and a time-domain evolution of δϵ=0 perturbations whose extracted decay exponents can be compared with the reported Ω values.
  2. [QNMs and conservation laws; spectrum section] The procedure of eliminating all modes with Im Ω>0 by imposing δϵ=0 is not validated. Energy conservation only forces δϵ(t) to be constant, i.e., either Ω=0 or δϵ_Ω=0 (Eq. (14)); the unstable modes seen without the condition must therefore be shown to have δϵ_Ω≠0 and to be numerical artifacts rather than genuine dynamics. Because the attractor property of the NTFP is exactly the absence of physical growing modes, this selection is load-bearing and needs a direct consistency check, for example by reporting δϵ_Ω for the discarded eigenvectors and by demonstrating their disappearance under a controlled regularization.
  3. [Accurate determination of the scaling function; Fig. 2] The input scaling function is itself selected by imposing Ĩa[gs]=Ĩb[gs] on a compact grid, which forces a Gaussian UV tail, while the presence of an IR cut-off is shown in Fig. 2 to produce a 1/p̄⁴ tail with divergent energy density. The paper motivates a UV cut-off from this discussion, but the QNM eigenfunctions have relative growth in the UV even for the Gaussian-tail scaling function, so the spectrum may depend on the tail selection and on the cut-off beyond what is asserted. A concrete test would be to repeat the eigenvalue calculation on the finite interval with the power-law-tail scaling function and a physical boundary condition, and to show either that the reported Ω values are unchanged or to quantify the change.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Eq. (16)] "Focker-Planck" should be "Fokker-Planck"; similar typos include "descretize" in the Setup section, "Gayuss-Lobatto" in Appendix 3, and "caclulated" in the conservation-laws section.
  2. [References] Reference [38] is incomplete (no publisher or year), and the arXiv field in reference [18] appears malformed; please correct the bibliographic entries.
  3. [Zero-mode discussion] The statement that the boundary condition "disposes of the predicted zero-mode Ω=0" and the subsequent calculation comparing the Ω=0 eigenfunction are confusing: if the mode is removed from the spectrum, its status as a physical perturbation should be clarified explicitly.
  4. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption says "the y axis multiplied by p̄^{-1}/√(D2 Ĩa[gs])", which reads like a division rather than a multiplication; please clarify how the plotted quantity relates to p̄ fs.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the QNM frequencies are eigenvalues of the linearized kinetic operator, and the analytic modes are recovered as independent cross-checks.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained. The central claim is governed by Eqs. (5) and (10): after imposing the scaling form (1)-(3), which follows from the homogeneity of the collision kernel, perturbations are separated as δf = B(t)^{iΩ} δf_Ω(p̄), and Ω is obtained as the eigenvalue of the linearized Boltzmann operator. No parameter in this procedure is fitted to the quantity being predicted; the numerically found modes Ω ≈ −4.29i, −6.49i, −7i, −8.59i are eigenvalues of a discretized linear operator, not outputs of a fit to relaxation data. The analytic modes Ω = i/β = −7i and Ω = 0 are derived from the reparametrization symmetries t* and tref of the scaling solution and then recovered independently in the numerics, which is a consistency check rather than a circular input. The scaling function fs is determined from Eq. (8) together with the self-consistency conditions (21); although the Gaussian UV tail is selected by imposing a fast-decay or cutoff boundary condition, this is an explicit physical regularization assumption and does not reuse the QNM claim. The paper itself flags the limitations that are relevant here: the full-grid spectrum of Appendix 4 (Fig. 7) contains additional modes that are not understood, and the main-text spectrum relies on a UV cutoff and the δϵ = 0 condition. Those are physical and numerical robustness concerns, not reductions of the eigenvalue result to its inputs. The paper cites prior work by one of the authors [28] for prescaling exponents, but the key steps are re-derived in the text and the load-bearing eigenvalue problem is solved independently. No self-citation chain is used to force the spectrum. The score of 1 reflects only a minor reliance on a same-author citation for classifying the B(t) behavior in Eq. (8); it does not affect the independence of the central QNM calculation.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities. The QNMs are mathematical perturbations of the distribution function. The main inputs are the Fokker-Planck kernel, the homogeneity assumption, and the boundary conditions selecting the scaling function and the physical spectrum. The choice of the Gaussian-tail solution and the δϵ=0 boundary condition are the most consequential assumptions, as they directly shape the computed tower of modes.

free parameters (3)
  • Power-law tail coefficient (integration constant) in scaling function = 0
    The asymptotic solution for the scaling function contains a coefficient controlling the 1/p^4 tail; it is set to zero to select the Gaussian UV tail, motivated by finite energy density and self-consistency (Appendix 3, Fig. 6). This choice determines the background f_s and hence the entire QNM spectrum.
  • Coulomb logarithm L = 1
    Set to 1 to make the Fokker-Planck kernel scale as Eq. (6). The paper acknowledges this neglects the time dependence of the Debye mass, which would otherwise introduce logarithmic corrections to the scaling exponents. This is a modeling approximation, not a fitted constant.
  • UV cut-off p_UV = 999 (and other values)
    Used to regularize the QNM calculation because δf_Ω/f_s diverges in the UV. The paper demonstrates cut-off independence of the reported modes, so this acts as a numerical regulator rather than a physical parameter, but it is chosen by hand.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Fokker-Planck collision kernel (16)-(17) is the correct effective kinetic description for small-angle elastic scattering in the overoccupied regime.
    Invoked in the Setup section to model weakly coupled gluon dynamics. If this kernel is not representative, the explicit scaling function and QNM spectrum would not apply to real systems.
  • domain assumption The collision kernel is a homogeneous functional of the distribution, enabling an exact self-similar solution of the form (1).
    Stated after Eq. (6) and supported by Ref. [28]. This homogeneity is essential for the existence of NTFPs and for the form of the perturbation equation.
  • domain assumption Energy (or particle number) conservation determines σ via Eq. (13), and the conserved quantity is completely contained in the scaling function f_s.
    Used in the section 'QNMs and conservation laws' to fix σ=4 for the direct energy cascade and to impose δϵ=0 as a consistency condition on the modes.
  • domain assumption The linearization around the NTFP is valid, and the perturbation amplitude can be chosen small enough that δf << f_s over the momentum range of interest.
    Used to derive Eq. (10). The paper later notes this fails at arbitrarily large momenta, necessitating a UV cut-off.
  • standard math The Chebyshev pseudospectral discretization converges to the exact spectrum in the limit of large grid point number.
    Standard numerical analysis assumption used throughout Appendices 3 and 4; the paper checks gridpoint convergence for the reported modes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quasinormal modes of nonthermal fixed points." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QRPXA4TZ

@misc{pith2026250201622,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quasinormal modes of nonthermal fixed points},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QRPXA4TZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.01622}
}
read the original abstract

Quasinormal modes play a prominent role in relaxation of diverse physical systems to equilibria, ranging from astrophysical black holes to tiny droplets of quark-gluon plasma at RHIC and LHC accelerators. We propose that a novel kind of quasinormal modes govern the direct approach to self-similar time evolution of nonthermal fixed points, whose relevance ranges from high energy physics to cold atom gases. We utilize black hole perturbation theory techniques to compute the spectrum of these far from equilibrium quasinormal modes for a kinetic theory with a Focker-Planck collision kernel in isotropic and homogeneous states. Our conclusion is that quasinormal modes of nonthermal fixed points give rise to a tower of progressively more decaying power-law contributions. A byproduct of our analysis is a precise determination and improved understanding of the distribution function characterizing nonthermal fixed points.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.01622 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The fact that the UV tail is Gaussian, ∝ p e¯ −p¯ 2/2 , is not as straightforward as one might think. For large p¯ the leading behavior from the equation for gs is actually ∝ 1/p¯ 4 . The constraint that makes the integrals for ˜Ia and ˜Ib conistent with their appearance in the overoccupied FP kernel, (18), selects the solution that has a Gaussian tail. This is shown in all details in Appendix 3. Interestingly, a po… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. This plot depicts the dependence of the scaling func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Comparisons of the momentum dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Result for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. This figure shows the spectrum for the QNM calcu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The spectrum of QNMs for a, maybe unrealisable, IR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Attractors Without Scaling: Adiabatic Hydrodynamization With and Without Inelastic Scattering

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Including inelastic scattering in a simplified gluon kinetic theory speeds up hydrodynamization, and attractors appear through gapped eigenstates of an effective Hamiltonian even without pre-thermal scaling.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [40]

    M. C. Abraao York, A. Kurkela, E. Lu and G. D. Moore, UV cascade in classical Yang-Mills theory via kinetic theory, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014), no. 7 074036 [arXiv:1401.3751]

    arXiv 2014

  2. [1]

    Berges, M

    J. Berges, M. P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas and R. Venugopalan, QCD thermalization: Ab initio approaches and interdisciplinary connections, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93 (2021), no. 3 035003 [arXiv:2005.12299]

    arXiv 2021

  3. [2]

    Ueda, Quantum equilibration, thermalization and prethermalization in ultracold atoms , Nature Rev

    M. Ueda, Quantum equilibration, thermalization and prethermalization in ultracold atoms , Nature Rev. Phys. 2 (2020), no. 12 669–681

    work page 2020

  4. [3]

    J. M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231–252 [arXiv:hep-th/9711200]

    arXiv 1998

  5. [4]

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory , Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105–114 [arXiv:hep-th/9802109]

    arXiv 1998

  6. [5]

    Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv

    E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253–291 [arXiv:hep-th/9802150]

    arXiv 1998

  7. [6]

    P. M. Chesler and L. G. Yaffe, Horizon formation and far-from-equilibrium isotropization in supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 211601 [arXiv:0812.2053]

    arXiv 2009

  8. [7]

    G. T. Horowitz and V. E. Hubeny, Quasinormal modes of AdS black holes and the approach to thermal equilibrium , Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 024027 [arXiv:hep-th/9909056]

    arXiv 2000

Show all 46 references
  1. [8]

    P. K. Kovtun and A. O. Starinets, Quasinormal modes and holography, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 086009 [arXiv:hep-th/0506184]

    2005 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso and A. O. Starinets, Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes , Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 163001 [arXiv:0905.2975]

    2009 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Micha and I

    R. Micha and I. I. Tkachev, Relativistic turbulence: A Long way from preheating to equilibrium , Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 121301 [arXiv:hep-ph/0210202]

    2003 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Berges, A

    J. Berges, A. Rothkopf and J. Schmidt, Non-thermal fixed points: Effective weak-coupling for strongly correlated systems far from equilibrium , Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 041603 [arXiv:0803.0131]

    2008 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Berges, K

    J. Berges, K. Boguslavski, S. Schlichting and R. Venugopalan, Turbulent thermalization process in heavy-ion collisions at ultrarelativistic energies , Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014), no. 7 074011 [arXiv:1303.5650]

    2014 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Kurkela and Y

    A. Kurkela and Y. Zhu, Isotropization and hydrodynamization in weakly coupled heavy-ion collisions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015), no. 18 182301 [arXiv:1506.06647]

    2015 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Pr¨ ufer, P

    M. Pr¨ ufer, P. Kunkel, H. Strobel, S. Lannig, D. Linnemann, C.-M. Schmied, J. Berges, T. Gasenzer and M. K. Oberthaler, Observation of universal dynamics in a spinor Bose gas far from equilibrium , Nature 563 (2018), no. 7730 217–220 [arXiv:1805.11881]

    2018 arXiv

  8. [15]

    S. Erne, R. B¨ ucker, T. Gasenzer, J. Berges and J. Schmiedmayer, Universal dynamics in an isolated one-dimensional Bose gas far from equilibrium , Nature 563 (2018), no. 7730 225–229 [arXiv:1805.12310]

    2018 arXiv

  9. [16]

    J. A. P. Glidden, C. Eigen, L. H. Dogra, T. A. Hilker, R. P. Smith and Z. Hadzibabic, Bidirectional dynamic scaling in an isolated Bose gas far from equilibrium , Nature Phys. 17 (2021), no. 4 457–461 [arXiv:2006.01118]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Navon, A

    N. Navon, A. L. Gaunt, R. P. Smith and Z. Hadzibabic, Emergence of a turbulent cascade in a quantum gas , Nature 539 (2016), no. 7627 72–75 [arXiv:1609.01271]

    2016 arXiv

  11. [18]

    S. P. Johnstone, A. J. Groszek, P. T. Starkey, C. J. Billington, T. P. Simula and K. Helmerson, Evolution of large-scale flow from turbulence in a two-dimensional superfluid, Science 364 (2019), no. 6447 1267–1271 [arXiv:”https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aat5793”]

    2019 doi

  12. [19]

    Helmrich, A

    S. Helmrich, A. Arias, G. Lochead, T. Wintermantel, M. Buchhold, S. Diehl and S. Whitlock, Signatures of self-organized criticality in an ultracold atomic gas , Nature 577 (2020), no. 7791 481–486 [arXiv:1806.09931]

    2020 arXiv

  13. [20]

    A. D. Garc ´ ıa-Orozco, L. Madeira, M. A. Moreno-Armijos, A. R. Fritsch, P. E. S. Tavares, P. C. M. Castilho, A. Cidrim, G. Roati and V. S. Bagnato, Universal dynamics of a turbulent superfluid Bose gas , Phys. Rev. A 106 (2022), no. 2 023314 [arXiv:2107.07421]

    2022 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Martirosyan, C

    G. Martirosyan, C. J. Ho, J. Etrych, Y. Zhang, A. Cao, Z. Hadzibabic and C. Eigen, Observation of subdiffusive dynamic scaling in a driven and disordered box-trapped Bose gas , arXiv:2304.06697

    arXiv

  15. [22]

    S. Huh, K. Mukherjee, K. Kwon, J. Seo, J. Hur, S. I. Mistakidis, H. R. Sadeghpour and J.-y. Choi, Universality class of a spinor Bose–Einstein condensate far from equilibrium , Nature Phys. 20 (2024), no. 3 402–408 [arXiv:2303.05230]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Lannig, M

    S. Lannig, M. Pr¨ ufer, Y. Deller, I. Siovitz, J. Dreher, T. Gasenzer, H. Strobel and M. K. Oberthaler, Observation of two non-thermal fixed points for the same microscopic symmetry, arXiv:2306.16497

    arXiv

  17. [24]

    M. Gazo, A. Karailiev, T. Satoor, C. Eigen, M. Ga lka and Z. Hadzibabic, Universal Coarsening in a Homogeneous Two-Dimensional Bose Gas , arXiv:2312.09248

    arXiv

  18. [25]

    Martirosyan, M

    G. Martirosyan, M. Gazo, J. Etrych, S. M. Fischer, S. J. 8 Morris, C. J. Ho, C. Eigen and Z. Hadzibabic, A universal speed limit for spreading of quantum coherence , arXiv:2410.08204

  19. [26]

    Berges, Nonequilibrium Quantum Fields: From Cold Atoms to Cosmology , arXiv:1503.02907

    J. Berges, Nonequilibrium Quantum Fields: From Cold Atoms to Cosmology , arXiv:1503.02907

    arXiv

  20. [27]

    Schmied, A

    C.-M. Schmied, A. N. Mikheev and T. Gasenzer, Non-thermal fixed points: Universal dynamics far from equilibrium, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 34 (2019), no. 29 1941006 [arXiv:1810.08143]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [28]

    M. P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas and T. Preis, Prescaling Relaxation to Nonthermal Attractors , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024), no. 7 071602 [arXiv:2307.07545]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Withers, Short-lived modes from hydrodynamic dispersion relations, JHEP 06 (2018) 059 [arXiv:1803.08058]

    B. Withers, Short-lived modes from hydrodynamic dispersion relations, JHEP 06 (2018) 059 [arXiv:1803.08058]

    2018 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Grozdanov, P

    S. Grozdanov, P. K. Kovtun, A. O. Starinets and P. Tadi´ c,Convergence of the Gradient Expansion in Hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019), no. 25 251601 [arXiv:1904.01018]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Are´ an, D

    D. Are´ an, D. G. Fari˜ na and K. Landsteiner, Pseudospectra of holographic quasinormal modes , JHEP 12 (2023) 187 [arXiv:2307.08751]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Cownden, C

    B. Cownden, C. Pantelidou and M. Zilh˜ ao,The pseudospectra of black holes in AdS , JHEP 05 (2024) 202 [arXiv:2312.08352]

    2024 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Carballo and B

    J. Carballo and B. Withers, Transient dynamics of quasinormal mode sums , JHEP 10 (2024) 084 [arXiv:2406.06685]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Micha and I

    R. Micha and I. I. Tkachev, Turbulent thermalization, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 043538 [arXiv:hep-ph/0403101]

    2004 arXiv

  28. [35]

    M. P. Heller and V. Svensson, How does relativistic kinetic theory remember about initial conditions? , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018), no. 5 054016 [arXiv:1802.08225]

    2018 arXiv

  29. [36]

    G. S. Denicol and J. Noronha, Spectrum of the Boltzmann collision operator for λϕ4 theory in the classical regime, Phys. Lett. B 850 (2024) 138487 [arXiv:2209.10370]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Brewer, B

    J. Brewer, B. Scheihing-Hitschfeld and Y. Yin, Scaling and adiabaticity in a rapidly expanding gluon plasma , JHEP 05 (2022) 145 [arXiv:2203.02427]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [38]

    J. Boyd, T. Marilyn and P. Eliot, Chebyshev and fourier spectral methods,

  32. [39]

    R. A. Janik, G. Plewa, H. Soltanpanahi and M. Spalinski, Linearized nonequilibrium dynamics in nonconformal plasma, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015), no. 12 126013 [arXiv:1503.07149]

    2015 arXiv

  33. [41]

    P. B. Arnold, G. D. Moore and L. G. Yaffe, Effective kinetic theory for high temperature gauge theories , JHEP 01 (2003) 030 [arXiv:hep-ph/0209353]

    2003 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Pi˜ neiro Orioli, K

    A. Pi˜ neiro Orioli, K. Boguslavski and J. Berges, Universal self-similar dynamics of relativistic and nonrelativistic field theories near nonthermal fixed points , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015), no. 2 025041 [arXiv:1503.02498]

    2015 arXiv

  35. [43]

    R. Walz, K. Boguslavski and J. Berges, Large-N kinetic theory for highly occupied systems , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018), no. 11 116011 [arXiv:1710.11146]

    2018 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Preis, M

    T. Preis, M. P. Heller and J. Berges, Stable and Unstable Perturbations in Universal Scaling Phenomena Far from Equilibrium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023), no. 3 031602 [arXiv:2209.14883]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Blaizot, J

    J.-P. Blaizot, J. Liao and L. McLerran, Gluon transport equation in the small angle approximation and the onset of bose–einstein condensation , Nuclear Physics A 920 (Dec., 2013) 58–77

    2013

  38. [46]

    Blaizot, B

    J.-P. Blaizot, B. Wu and L. Yan, Quark production, bose–einstein condensates and thermalization of the quark–gluon plasma , Nuclear Physics A 930 (Oct., 2014) 139–162. 9 Appendices Appendix 1: On the possibility of an infrared cascade.– The Fokker-Planck kinetic theory we cons...

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.