Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review

As of 11 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 33 of 33 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2607.22553.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2607.22553 v1

Coverage vector

measured 33 of 33 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.882362Z

measured 33 of 33 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00

measured 0 of 0 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

33 of 33 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact0
  • verified fuzzy0
  • unresolved33
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation f48863e8-3143-4857-9f7e-40e151e536bf · outbound

This paper cites A Dataset of Peer Reviews (PeerRead): Collection, Insights and.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review A Dataset of Peer Reviews (PeerRead): Collection, Insights and

Reference 1

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.048263Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.048263Z digest=sha256:7d961045ea60e16a0d8fe0fddcc31c79878f2a9716dca1226ae9c258fdf644ee

Observation 8f031eb2-307d-425d-8850-2a5c4e9f06a6 · outbound

This paper cites 2023 , url =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2023 , url =

Reference 2

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.100131Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.100131Z digest=sha256:ce9b8ec9a504bcfd1a7321bc0411e9466fbe9c473a98a623b1d71a0dcb4f7d3b

Observation 142b4344-ea87-4db5-9895-281df0fc8285 · outbound

This paper cites 2023 , doi =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2023 , doi =

Reference 3

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.173000Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.173000Z digest=sha256:1421d3bafa22cc8d5283643cafa05cc3a45f4d94396559453889d4f15771f5f4

Observation d000ce06-1f1e-4ca6-ae73-d299b2e176d8 · outbound

This paper cites 2024 , eprint =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2024 , eprint =

Reference 4

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.246499Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.246499Z digest=sha256:6781bc841c56c3d1a0347c1a0188107411aa678e4b5cc048029976199bb84290

Observation 8fe7d292-aed9-4275-bbce-4ee7dd587fd0 · outbound

This paper cites Proceedings of INLG 2020 , year =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Proceedings of INLG 2020 , year =

Reference 5

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.356517Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.356517Z digest=sha256:4437369078b3a0fc574c7a37e389bd44581cead0e0f88ee555bc89d4d4812501

Observation 3018704f-ac7b-4341-bf94-43cfff9beb78 · outbound

This paper cites Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , volume =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , volume =

Reference 6

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.488513Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.488513Z digest=sha256:b3151c8973dae288649bcb2069de5431eb9c8f8c87cfa3f889c4cc346d69cb3d

Observation d4e37bbc-0a91-401c-bd01-968de156f989 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Unresolved cited work

Reference 7

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.604970Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.604970Z digest=sha256:35b97a80a7defa0e746fb149440551d4af0014cbccea1fb7a456de6ba6df5ed3

Observation 1c323fdc-4d56-4d2f-b978-4eccca9bea24 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint =

Reference 8

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.715276Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.715276Z digest=sha256:731622baacea65642865d7d2c6057e5a2c24c72b5c5cea4be925a236f2741a80

Observation 6592163d-c79c-4f60-a397-d83a752ebca6 · outbound

This paper cites Proceedings of ACL 2025 (Long Papers) , year =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Proceedings of ACL 2025 (Long Papers) , year =

Reference 9

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.848020Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.848020Z digest=sha256:f0208e20471504f5ab1bd65914a33a187363f925dd883a1b3810cac76659cc1f

Observation 921c3332-43f9-4db5-a634-5ebfd92cc4f1 · outbound

This paper cites Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Investigating AI Text Detectability in Peer Review.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Investigating AI Text Detectability in Peer Review

Reference 10

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.956460Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.956460Z digest=sha256:f35aebaf2c39bb9de14f391bd762cf283c3707f88d1cf2ec756d008ee42eb0b1

Observation 184d1fc7-0313-427e-8e8e-cba0e47348c9 · outbound

This paper cites Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews

Reference 11

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.030239Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.030239Z digest=sha256:da651b4d83b976c4009cdccb71021b21889fffaeac13a411e28430198ca46062

Observation 221a042e-b85b-498a-bd5a-d54ff826dd97 · outbound

This paper cites NEJM AI , volume =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review NEJM AI , volume =

Reference 12

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.103844Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.103844Z digest=sha256:bee501c0c986c116a4baf2cfd8b2306884a63b077ec2893cfc718f187be36fbf

Observation 60f712bd-1bf0-4c8b-bd84-204fb1668612 · outbound

This paper cites AI-Driven Review Systems: Evaluating LLMs in Scalable and Bias-Aware Academic Reviews.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review AI-Driven Review Systems: Evaluating LLMs in Scalable and Bias-Aware Academic Reviews

Reference 13

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.204073Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.204073Z digest=sha256:812baa2c54e853a4b3a537b3413e6f996d6fd32a2e4dec39a71f78420c5de488

Observation 218d4d5e-2256-4175-8c93-5309df1970e6 · outbound

This paper cites 2023 , eprint =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2023 , eprint =

Reference 14

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.302769Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.302769Z digest=sha256:671d737eba0459b7b76d8fb12e17fc26f81c1e7f37962a8988503981b61892fb

Observation 3320b049-02ff-40a7-9178-92aed793b4dc · outbound

This paper cites Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena

Reference 15

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.403675Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.403675Z digest=sha256:4269efb11e2970051a4a3efda3c9be97856379b4a4a4fe84318c53187690152b

Observation 3d4faac9-018d-42c0-91ee-68dcf3821c15 · outbound

This paper cites Scientometrics , volume=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Scientometrics , volume=

Reference 16

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.497340Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.497340Z digest=sha256:a36d184164c9c83d4cbbf4fde7d555cd5bca2f2a7b80894b7d42f6ffd329a209

Observation 06b8d714-d5f1-40f4-aabe-b65160d11e62 · outbound

This paper cites ReviewEval: An Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Reviews.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review ReviewEval: An Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Reviews

Reference 17

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.592032Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.592032Z digest=sha256:3175565e99ccb2db6b4710a81f7058d8e838e72637ba06cbafa6a74c4a8877f1

Observation 7b2e4ab8-f058-4f91-b414-8188302a566a · outbound

This paper cites GPT-4 Technical Report.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review GPT-4 Technical Report

Reference 18

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.689782Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.689782Z digest=sha256:1d3e181f647bc98ec34fc6c72579b83cae765441eda84f513edfc79c61298c5f

Observation b8fdf81d-baff-413d-9ea8-afd54faf37b0 · outbound

This paper cites 2020 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2020 , eprint=

Reference 19

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.768931Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.768931Z digest=sha256:c87d72d2b6dc9b6d003bc24f4c58cd7ef7daf8d210e01624274c59c0d0d27d8a

Observation cdc0819f-9030-43a4-8419-1b7e6bfce616 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 20

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.852005Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.852005Z digest=sha256:6098383aca0637b412a8e7da172098d91604f5b61bbff2f1a2300ae802d06bcf

Observation 4c517e97-f21a-402e-ac1a-b67584e792b6 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 21

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.950203Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.950203Z digest=sha256:6f67b1b2a0d8e1992e74b3939cc4097a3f913ccab21d4934f6803270c4043b2c

Observation 88a74259-182e-4420-b07e-1871cc35b76d · outbound

This paper cites Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation , pages =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation , pages =

Reference 22

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.017291Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.017291Z digest=sha256:8448e0cf8b41ae452ac881a6dd7cd1b994c35c3546a26739d1446eecc5bfa035

Observation 510e1560-dec0-4b0c-b852-900e5606af50 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 23

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.084455Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.084455Z digest=sha256:be6322f2b8413457f10a542f6da113a958d61d6144c133c5a7d497949d422f1d

Observation 424146ee-b0ea-4c87-8e86-7d4c02411234 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 24

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.160767Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.160767Z digest=sha256:d3deddc00f7ddc9a6f81e77bdb45170e2fddeb585a77a4905ebcc87e3f0f7c05

Observation d4621ba5-f5ea-463d-a14e-b00a277bb5b8 · outbound

This paper cites Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work , articleno =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work , articleno =

Reference 25

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.227216Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.227216Z digest=sha256:5b58fa849333fa8b11599c43d81db5753022e5dbc939296fbc8d572029b9e086

Observation c0fe434d-bc41-4d11-b1ff-6cbb50c66a9e · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 26

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.337936Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.337936Z digest=sha256:8ecf61322f5efca4d8a5925d777ce97a5a42cddf9fcf270b72de01e0c75e7413

Observation d4f0ced2-e864-4036-85ec-333106b71273 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 27

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.405857Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.405857Z digest=sha256:fcd1865c1ba515fbe77d02e5da2bd52b684fb29df27977dee9888c098f5113be

Observation c0e69f67-88a1-467f-a933-919543d11566 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 28

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.469618Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.469618Z digest=sha256:804e6bcca38bb2b0790f45ed4364655e491a8e7a504607737b6dbc93ff63d0c7

Observation 1c0740d2-13e7-4bd7-8d6d-f73de55bf546 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 29

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.542924Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.542924Z digest=sha256:6b50dc010007235ca9ec3c149e099d99e7001aabadc34de9df19eabfe786cef6

Observation 367ddb12-929c-48f7-92c4-84ee8da3871d · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Unresolved cited work

Reference 30

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.610284Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.610284Z digest=sha256:fef9665fd41262549a6fc0dbabf840567e71b3c9341f3d64334420e94ae6c88c

Observation 201d7f7a-574f-4cd3-bbbe-0f76523a25db · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 31

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.701399Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.701399Z digest=sha256:7ac174c6454c17fc148c56fbf95d5caed640a383a8e7d8918e4613d41a35b6db

Observation 88dd7e9c-e8f5-4d27-87fb-53f7422f6697 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , journal =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , journal =

Reference 32

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.786083Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.786083Z digest=sha256:6e793537b76d31f92835ae34f3063d4ec2c6947816f9525d9cec67535c2e2df0

Observation fe10538f-a9ed-4cf3-920f-0a37c91fbd55 · outbound

This paper cites Qwen3 Technical Report.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Qwen3 Technical Report

Reference 33

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.882362Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.882362Z digest=sha256:a34a99b16aa0de3161efd2545288cfb99215ea1b69bb4b41dbfb25b73460c933

Pith citing papers

No inbound Pith citation observations are available.