REVIEW
Time-Aligned Multichannel Coherence Estimation under Intermittent Observations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Time misalignment and intermittent readout can bias multichannel dependence estimates by mixing timing error with missing data. Time-Aligned Multichannel Coherence Estimation (TAMCE) reports a causal network coherence statistic G together with an explicit observation-support state Q using normalized recursive channel states, independent timing calibration, and confidence-weighted correlation. A non-saturated benchmark with 16 independent seeds compares coincidence, zero filling, pairwise-complete correlation, causal hold-last completion, non-causal interpolation, diagonal intermittent-observation Kalman filtering, and TAMCE. At channel-correlated missingness 0.60, TAMCE obtains AUC 0.749 and latent-target RMSE 0.554, versus 0.723 and 0.713 for aligned zero filling and 0.826 and 0.418 for Kalman filtering. The TAMCE-zero-fill AUC difference is not statistically significant (p = 0.087). Same-record statistic ablations and selective risk-coverage tests show that Q is useful for abstention but carries essentially the same availability information as direct mask-derived pair support. Heavy-tail and drift stresses do not reverse the Kalman fidelity advantage. TAMCE is therefore supported as a model-light coherence-and-provenance interface for online monitoring and data-quality logic, not as a universally superior estimator.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.