Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Odd dynamics of passive objects in a chiral active bath

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For heavy symmetric disks in chiral baths, odd diffusion and odd mobility obey an Einstein relation, so odd positional currents vanish while odd momentum-space currents persist.

desk verdict A genuinely interesting framework for odd transport in chiral baths, but the advertised disk-rod-wedge hierarchy needs a mass sweep before the adiabatic claim holds. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.20689 v2 pith:QUU6KFMG submitted 2024-12-30 cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.soft

Cory Hargus , Federico Ghimenti , Julien Tailleur , Frédéric van Wijland This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.soft
keywords chiralactivebathodddiffusivitymobilityEinsteinrelationratchetmotionadiabaticeliminationeffectivetemperaturefar-fieldmultipoleexpansion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper answers how a passive object's shape controls the nonequilibrium dynamics it inherits from a chiral active bath: at large object mass, the bath can be adiabatically eliminated, and the paper derives exact effective Langevin dynamics. Its central result is that for a rotationally symmetric disk the odd diffusion and odd mobility satisfy an Einstein relation; consequently positional-space odd currents vanish, even though momentum-space odd currents persist because the odd noise and friction coefficients do not satisfy a second fluctuation-dissipation relation. As symmetry is lowered, equilibrium-like behaviour degrades: a rod displays two different effective temperatures, and a wedge acts as a full ratchet. The paper also derives the universal far-field density and current patterns in the bath, measured in simulations, and shows they carry the same broken symmetries. A sympathetic reader would care because this gives a first-principles framework for using object shape and mass to engineer ratchet and odd transport in chiral active fluids.

What carries the argument

The central object is the adiabatically reduced Langevin description, where the object evolves under mean bath forces and torques, a $2\times2$ block friction matrix $\zeta$ built from bath-force correlations via a Green-Kubo-type formula, and Gaussian noise whose correlation matrix $\lambda$ obeys another Green-Kubo formula. The argument is carried by the symmetry structure of these matrices: isotropy for the disk, $C_2$ symmetry for the rod (which decouples translation from rotation), and full breaking of $C_n$ symmetry for the wedge (which couples them). The odd components of these matrices, coming from the chirality of the bath, are what generate odd diffusivity, odd mobility, ratchet torques, and the persistent momentum-space currents.

What would settle it

In a molecular dynamics simulation of a harmonically confined disk in a chiral active bath at $\epsilon = \sqrt{\gamma/(D_r M)} \ll 1$, measure the steady-state position flux $\mathbf{J}_R^{ss} = (T^{\mathrm{eff}}\boldsymbol{\mu} - \mathbf{D})\nabla\rho_R$ and the ratio $D_\perp/\mu_\perp$. If $\mathbf{J}_R^{ss}$ does not vanish or $D_\perp/\mu_\perp \neq T^{\mathrm{eff}}$ within statistical error, the paper's odd Einstein relation is not correct.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the adiabatic limit of a massive object, the paper derives the most general Langevin dynamics for a rigid body in a chiral active bath by integrating out the bath degrees of freedom, leaving effective friction, noise, mean force, and mean torque coefficients. For a rotationally symmetric disk, it shows that the even and odd parts of diffusivity and mobility are connected by $D_\parallel = T^{\mathrm{eff}}\mu_\parallel$ and $D_\perp = T^{\mathrm{eff}}\mu_\perp$, so the two odd contributions to the steady-state position-space flux exactly cancel and the disk adopts a Boltzmann distribution with a single effective temperature $T^{\mathrm{eff}}$. However, the corresponding noise and friction coefficients satisfy $\lambda_\parallel = T^{\mathrm{eff}}\zeta_\parallel$ but $\lambda_\perp \neq T^{\mathrm{eff}}\zeta_\perp$, leaving persistent circulating currents in momentum space as a unique odd signature of the chiral nonequilibrium bath. For a $C_2$-symmetric rod, translational and rotational dynamics decouple, producing a net rotational ratchet velocity and two independent effective temperatures, one translational and one rotational. For a wedge with no $C_n$ symmetry, rotation and translation couple in both friction and noise, so no effective temperatures exist and the wedge behaves as both a translational and rotational ratchet; the broken symmetry is also imprinted on the bath as universal far-field density modulations and currents with dipolar and quadrupolar structure.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the bath reaches a quasi-static conditional steady state around each instantaneous object configuration before the object moves appreciably—the factorisation $\rho \approx \rho_o \rho_b$ with $\epsilon = \sqrt{\gamma/(D_r M)} \ll 1$—together with the neglect of long-time tails from conservation laws.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A heavy disk confined in a chiral active bath has Boltzmann positional statistics with a single effective temperature $T^{\mathrm{eff}}$, so its steady-state position-space flux vanishes even though the bath is out of equilibrium.
  • For a rod, translational and rotational degrees of freedom independently equilibrate at two temperatures $T_R^{\mathrm{eff}}$ and $T_\Theta^{\mathrm{eff}}$, and in the adiabatic limit the rod spins at the same angular velocity whether pinned or free to translate.
  • A wedge loses any effective equilibrium description; it translates and rotates as a ratchet, with the perpendicular ratchet speed and angular velocity peaked when the gyroradius $\ell_g$ matches the wedge size, and the parallel velocity can reverse sign with $\ell_g$.
  • The bath develops universal far-field density modulations and currents: a rod produces a quadrupolar leading field, a wedge a dipolar one, and bath chirality rotates these patterns; the rotational near-field flux is tied to the torque on the object.
  • Odd transport coefficients of a disk are maximised when the disk diameter is of order $\ell_g$, giving a design rule for maximal odd response, and outside the adiabatic limit the disk's odd Einstein relation breaks down with circulating position-space currents reappearing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension not in the paper: the ratio $D_\perp/\mu_\perp$ for a heavy symmetric probe in a real chiral active suspension could be used as a direct thermometer of $T^{\mathrm{eff}}$, and deviations from $D_\parallel/\mu_\parallel$ would indicate departure from the adiabatic limit.
  • The far-field dipole/quadrupole density fields imply long-ranged bath-mediated interactions between two objects; since a rod's or wedge's dipole moment has a sign and orientation fixed by its chirality, pairs should experience chiral-selective attraction or repulsion—an effect the paper does not compute.
  • For non-symmetric objects where scalar effective temperatures fail, one could define a matrix-valued effective temperature $\mathbf{T} = \lambda \zeta^{-1}$; for the wedge this matrix would be non-symmetric, and its antisymmetric part would quantify the failure of any equilibrium-like description.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a Langevin description for a passive rigid body of arbitrary shape immersed in a chiral active bath, in the adiabatic limit of large object mass. It predicts that a disk has an effective equilibrium description with an Einstein relation for both even and odd transport coefficients, a rod has two distinct effective temperatures, and a wedge is fully irreversible with both rotational and translational ratchet motion. The paper also derives a multipole expansion for the far-field density and current of the bath and verifies it numerically. The claims are supported by molecular dynamics simulations for a disk, rod, and wedge, with the disk showing detailed mass-dependence.

Significance. If the results hold, they unify and extend odd transport phenomena in chiral active baths, and the symmetry hierarchy (disk to rod to wedge) is an elegant organizing principle. The disk Einstein relation for odd coefficients is a nontrivial prediction, and the far-field multipole formulas are practical tools. A notable strength is that the simulations are made reproducible with public code, and the disk mass sweep provides a stringent test of the adiabatic limit. However, the central analytic derivations are deferred to an unpublished companion, and the rod/wedge simulations are only at one mass that may not be in the adiabatic regime; these gaps must be addressed before the full scope of the claims is established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Paragraph before Eq. (3); Figs. 3 and 4] The adiabatic parameter is defined in the paragraph before Eq. (3) as ε = sqrt(γ/(D_r M)). With the stated parameters f0 = γ = 1 and ℓp = 10, one has D_r = 0.1, so at M = 100, ε ≈ 0.316, which is not small. The disk results are shown to converge to the adiabatic limit via a mass sweep over M ∈ [10^-2, 10^3] (Fig. 2), but the rod (Fig. 3) and wedge (Fig. 4) results are presented only at M = 100. Without a mass sweep for these shapes, the two-temperature description of Eq. (12) and the ratchet velocities v⊥ and Ω in Fig. 4a cannot be confirmed as adiabatic-limit results; they may carry significant finite-mass corrections that could alter the claimed symmetry hierarchy. Please provide mass sweeps for the rod and wedge, or otherwise quantify the size of O(ε) corrections at M = 100.
  2. [Eqs. (3)-(6) and (9)-(10); reference [42]] The effective Langevin dynamics (3), the Agarwal formula (4), and the Green-Kubo relation (6) are stated without derivation, as are the Einstein relations (9) and the inequality (10). These are deferred to a companion paper [42] that is listed as "submitted to phys. rev. e" and is not accessible. Since these equations are the foundation for all subsequent claims, the Letter is not self-contained. At minimum, the companion should be made available (e.g., on arXiv) or the key steps of the derivation should be included in an appendix or supplementary material.
  3. [Section 'The C2 spinning rod'; reference [42]] The claim that the adiabatic dynamics of rotationally-symmetric objects is statistically reversible under combined time reversal and chirality inversion is presented as the rationalization for the effective equilibrium of the disk and the two-temperature description of the rod, but no argument is given in the Letter beyond a citation to [42]. Since this hidden symmetry is a load-bearing concept for the central hierarchy, please include a concise derivation or explicit statement of the symmetry argument in the Letter.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 5 heading] The heading reads "F ar-field density and currents"; this should be "Far-field density and currents".
  2. [Section 'The Π steering wedge'] The phrase "acts over a vanishing small distance" should be "acts over a vanishingly small distance".
  3. [Reference [42]] The companion paper is cited as "submitted to phys. rev. e"; please update the reference with an arXiv identifier or a published DOI when available, as the current form prevents readers from accessing the derivations.
  4. [Eq. (13)] The notation Db∥ is used in Eq. (13) but the decomposition of the bath diffusivity into even and odd parts is not defined in the main text; please clarify that Db∥ is the isotropic part of the bath diffusivity.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The odd Einstein relation D⊥ = Teff μ⊥ is an identity of the linear Langevin dynamics, not an independent prediction; the other central claims are simulation-supported.

  1. self definitional [Section 'The SO(2) swirling disk', Eqs. (7)-(9)]
    "The flux in R-space is J ss R = (T effµ − D)∇RρR, where D... is the diffusivity computed from the Green-Kubo relation D = 1/M^2∫0∞ dt⟨P(t)P(0)⟩. Conversely, the mobility µ = µ∥1 + µ⊥A = ζ^{-1} predicts the drift under an external force F ext ... Einstein relations then follow as D∥ = T effµ∥, D⊥ = T effµ⊥, (9) remarkably holding for the odd parts as well as the even."

    In the linear Langevin equation (7), Pdot = -M^{-1}ζP + ξ, the velocity autocorrelation obeys d/dt⟨P(t)P(0)⟩ = -M^{-1}ζ⟨P(t)P(0)⟩ for t>0, so ∫0∞⟨P(t)P(0)⟩dt = M ζ^{-1}⟨P(0)P(0)^T⟩. The equal-time covariance is symmetric and, with T^eff defined by the Boltzmann factor in Eq. (8), equals M T^eff 1. Substituting into the Green-Kubo definition of D gives D = T^eff ζ^{-1} = T^eff μ, for both even and odd components, with no use of λ⊥ or any fluctuation-dissipation condition. Thus Eq. (9) holds by construction for every Langevin equation of the form (7); it is a restatement of the definitions of D, μ, and T^eff, not an independent Einstein relation. The claim that odd D⊥ and μ⊥ are 'remarkably' connected is therefore an identity, and the 'independent thermometer' from D/μ in Fig.

full rationale

The main theoretical skeleton—adiabatic elimination leading to Eq. (3), the Agarwal friction formula (4), and the Green-Kubo noise (6)—is stated rather than derived in this Letter and deferred to companion paper [42] by the same authors; this is a self-citation dependency, but the numerical simulations (Figs. 2-5) provide independent checks, so I do not count it as circular. The one genuine circular step is Eq. (9): for the isotropic linear Langevin equation (7), the Green-Kubo diffusivity and the mobility defined as ζ^{-1} satisfy D = Teff μ identically once Teff is defined from the kinetic energy; this requires no relation between λ and ζ and thus the 'odd Einstein relation' reduces by construction to the definitions. The paper's presentation of the D/μ ratio as an independent thermometer (Fig. 2b) is therefore misleading. The rod two-temperature result, wedge ratchet velocities, and far-field multipole densities are measured rather than fitted and remain independent content, though the rod/wedge adiabatic limit is only shown at M=100 where ε=sqrt(γ/(Dr M))≈0.316, and the paper itself flags neglect of long-time tails; these are correctness risks, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; the effective temperature and transport coefficients are measured outputs. No new entities are introduced. The main axioms are the adiabatic limit, the specific bath model, the neglect of long-time tails, and the hidden reversibility invoked for symmetric objects.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Adiabatic factorization ρ ≈ ρ_o ρ_b for large object mass
    Stated in the intro: 'If the motion of the object is very slow relative to that of the bath, we can work in the adiabatic limit...'. This is the foundation for Eqs. (3)-(6).
  • domain assumption Bath modeled as chiral active Brownian particles with reciprocal, Hamiltonian object-bath interactions
    Eq. (2) defines the bath; 'Object-bath interactions are reciprocal, with Σ_i F_i = −F'. This sets the microscopic model.
  • domain assumption Neglect of long-time tails due to conservation laws
    Stated after Eq. (6): 'They hold in any dimension d ≥ 2 but neglect long-time tails due to conservation laws.' Affects 2D applicability.
  • ad hoc to paper Hidden statistical reversibility under combined time reversal and chirality inversion for Cn-symmetric objects
    Invoked to rationalize effective equilibrium for disk and rod; proof deferred to companion [42]. Without this, the derivation of the Einstein relation and effective temperatures is incomplete.
  • standard math Agarwal formula and Green-Kubo relations are valid under adiabatic conditions
    Used to compute friction ζ (Eq. 4) and noise correlations λ (Eq. 6); assumed valid in the adiabatic limit.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Odd dynamics of passive objects in a chiral active bath." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QUU6KFMG

@misc{pith2026241220689,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Odd dynamics of passive objects in a chiral active bath},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QUU6KFMG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.20689}
}
read the original abstract

When submerged in a chiral active bath, a passive object becomes a spinning ratchet imbued with odd transport properties. We present the most general Langevin dynamics for a rigid body in a chiral active bath, in the adiabatic limit of large object mass. For rotationally symmetric objects, odd diffusion and odd mobility are connected by an Einstein relation, that we show numerically to break down outside the adiabatic limit. As the object symmetry decreases, its dynamics becomes increasingly irreversible: a massive disk exhibits an effective equilibrium dynamics, while a rod admits distinct translational and rotational temperatures, and a wedge is fully irreversible.Conversely, this departure from equilibrium can be read in universal far-field currents and density modulations of the bath, which we measure numerically and derive analytically.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.20689 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The simulations in Fig. 2a show how the nonequi￾librium dynamics of light disks are replaced at large M by an effective equilibrium one, leading to the Boltzmann steady-state solution of Eq. (7) given by ρ ss o = ρR(R)ρP (P ) ∝ e −(U(R)+ 1 2M |P | 2 )/Teff , (8) where T eff = 1 2M ⟨|P | 2 ⟩ = 1 2 k⟨|R| 2 ⟩ is an effective tem￾perature. The flux in R-space is J ss R = [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. a, where a rod pinned at its center is shown to spin at the same speed as an unpinned rod (only) in the adi￾abatic limit. The freely rotating rod is then Boltzmann￾distributed as ρ ss o ∝ e −δL2/2ITeff Θ , where δL = L−IΩ and T eff Θ = I −1 ⟨δL2 ⟩ is the rotational temperature. Another consequence of this decoupling is that trans￾lational and rotational degrees of freedom are indepen￾dently equilibrated, but at diff… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Emergent odd viscoelasticity in chiral soft glassy materials

    cond-mat.soft 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A chiral soft glassy rheology model predicts odd viscosity in steady shear and an odd viscoelastic spectrum with a resonance at twice the active rotation frequency.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [42]

    Ratchet motion and odd dynamics driven by bro- ken symmetries of passive objects in a chiral active bath (submitted to phys. rev. e),

    C. Hargus, F. Ghimenti, J. Tailleur, and F. Van Wij- land, “Ratchet motion and odd dynamics driven by bro- ken symmetries of passive objects in a chiral active bath (submitted to phys. rev. e),”

    work page

  2. [1]

    Wu and A

    X.-L. Wu and A. Libchaber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3017 (2000)

    work page 2000

  3. [2]

    D. Loi, S. Mossa, and L. F. Cugliandolo, Physical Review E 77, 051111 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [3]

    P. T. Underhill, J. P. Hernandez-Ortiz, and M. D. Gra- ham, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 248101 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [4]

    K. C. Leptos, J. S. Guasto, J. P. Gollub, A. I. Pesci, and R. E. Goldstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 198103 (2009)

    work page 2009

  6. [5]

    Dunkel, V

    J. Dunkel, V. B. Putz, I. M. Zaid, and J. M. Yeomans, Soft Matter 6, 4268 (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [6]

    Kurtuldu, J

    H. Kurtuldu, J. S. Guasto, K. A. Johnson, and J. P. Gollub, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 108, 10391 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [7]

    Foffano, J

    G. Foffano, J. S. Lintuvuori, K. Stratford, M. E. Cates, and D. Marenduzzo, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 028103 (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 67 references
  1. [8]

    G. L. Mi˜ no, J. Dunstan, A. Rousselet, E. Cl´ ement, and R. Soto, J. Fluid Mech. 729, 423 (2013)

    2013

  2. [9]

    Morozov and D

    A. Morozov and D. Marenduzzo, Soft Matter 10, 2748 (2014)

    2014

  3. [10]

    E. W. Burkholder and J. F. Brady, Phys. Rev. E 95, 052605 (2017)

    2017

  4. [11]

    Chaki and R

    S. Chaki and R. Chakrabarti, Phys. A Stat. Mech. its Appl. 511, 302 (2018)

    2018

  5. [12]

    Kanazawa, T

    K. Kanazawa, T. G. Sano, A. Cairoli, and A. Baule, Nature 579, 364 (2020)

    2020

  6. [13]

    Kneˇ zevi´ c and H

    M. Kneˇ zevi´ c and H. Stark, New J. Phys. 22, 113025 (2020)

    2020

  7. [14]

    Reichert, L

    J. Reichert, L. F. Granz, and T. Voigtmann, Eur. Phys. J. E 44, 27 (2021)

    2021

  8. [15]

    Maes, Phys

    C. Maes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 208001 (2020)

    2020

  9. [16]

    Granek, Y

    O. Granek, Y. Kafri, and J. Tailleur, Physical Review Letters 129 (2022), 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.038001

    2022 doi

  10. [17]

    Solon and J

    A. Solon and J. M. Horowitz, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 55 (2022), 10.1088/1751- 8121/ac5d82

    2022 doi

  11. [18]

    Sorkin, H

    B. Sorkin, H. Diamant, G. Ariel, and T. Markovich, Physical Review Letters 133, 267101 (2024)

    2024

  12. [19]

    M. O. Magnasco, Physical Review Letters 71, 1477 (1993)

    1993

  13. [20]

    Van den Broeck, R

    C. Van den Broeck, R. Kawai, and P. Meurs, Physical review letters 93, 090601 (2004)

    2004

  14. [21]

    Angelani, A

    L. Angelani, A. Costanzo, and R. Di Leonardo, Euro- physics Letters 96, 68002 (2011)

    2011

  15. [22]

    Gnoli, A

    A. Gnoli, A. Petri, F. Dalton, G. Pontuale, G. Gradenigo, A. Sarracino, and A. Puglisi, Physical review letters 110, 120601 (2013)

    2013

  16. [23]

    C. O. Reichhardt and C. Reichhardt, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 8, 51 (2017)

    2017

  17. [24]

    Krishnamurthy, S

    S. Krishnamurthy, S. Ghosh, D. Chatterji, R. Ganapathy, and A. Sood, Nature Physics 12, 1134 (2016)

    2016

  18. [25]

    Zakine, A

    R. Zakine, A. Solon, T. Gingrich, and F. Van Wijland, Entropy 19, 193 (2017)

    2017

  19. [26]

    Pietzonka, ´E

    P. Pietzonka, ´E. Fodor, C. Lohrmann, M. E. Cates, and U. Seifert, Physical Review X 9, 041032 (2019)

    2019

  20. [27]

    Fodor and M

    ´E. Fodor and M. E. Cates, Europhysics Letters 134, 10003 (2021)

    2021

  21. [28]

    Di Leonardo, L

    R. Di Leonardo, L. Angelani, D. Dell’Arciprete, G. Ruocco, V. Iebba, S. Schippa, M. P. Conte, F. Mecarini, F. De Angelis, and E. Di Fabrizio, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 9541 (2010)

    2010

  22. [29]

    Sokolov, M

    A. Sokolov, M. M. Apodaca, B. A. Grzybowski, and I. S. Aranson, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 969 (2010)

    2010

  23. [30]

    Transport and Energetics of Bacterial Rectification,

    S. Anand, X. Ma, S. Guo, S. Martiniani, and X. Cheng, “Transport and Energetics of Bacterial Rectification,” (2024), arXiv:2308.08421 [cond-mat]

    2024

  24. [31]

    Li, W.-j

    J.-R. Li, W.-j. Zhu, J.-J. Li, J.-C. Wu, and B.-Q. Ai, New Journal of Physics 25, 043031 (2023)

    2023

  25. [32]

    Hargus, J

    C. Hargus, J. M. Epstein, and K. K. Mandadapu, Phys- ical Review Letters 127, 178001 (2021)

    2021

  26. [33]

    E. Kalz, H. D. Vuijk, I. Abdoli, J. U. Sommer, H. L¨ owen, and A. Sharma, Physical Review Letters 129, 90601 (2022), 2206.13566

    2022 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Reichhardt and C

    C. Reichhardt and C. J. O. Reichhardt, Physical Review E 100, 012604 (2019), arXiv:1901.11107

    2019 arXiv

  28. [35]

    A. R. Poggioli and D. T. Limmer, Physical Review Let- ters 130, 158201 (2023)

    2023

  29. [36]

    Drescher, K

    K. Drescher, K. C. Leptos, I. Tuval, T. Ishikawa, T. J. 6 Pedley, and R. E. Goldstein, Physical review letters 102, 168101 (2009)

    2009

  30. [37]

    A. P. Petroff, X.-L. Wu, and A. Libchaber, Physical review letters 114, 158102 (2015)

    2015

  31. [38]

    Beppu, Z

    K. Beppu, Z. Izri, T. Sato, Y. Yamanishi, Y. Sumino, and Y. T. Maeda, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2107461118 (2021)

    2021

  32. [39]

    T. H. Tan, A. Mietke, J. Li, Y. Chen, H. Higinbotham, P. J. Foster, S. Gokhale, J. Dunkel, and N. Fakhri, Na- ture 607, 287 (2022)

    2022

  33. [40]

    V. Soni, E. S. Bililign, S. Magkiriadou, S. Sacanna, D. Bartolo, M. J. Shelley, and W. T. M. Irvine, Nature Physics 15, 1188 (2019)

    2019

  34. [41]

    E. S. Bililign, F. Balboa Usabiaga, Y. A. Ganan, A. Pon- cet, V. Soni, S. Magkiriadou, M. J. Shelley, D. Bartolo, and W. T. Irvine, Nature Physics 18, 212 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Van Kampen and I

    N. Van Kampen and I. Oppenheim, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 138, 231 (1986)

    1986

  36. [44]

    Granek, Y

    O. Granek, Y. Baek, Y. Kafri, and A. P. Solon, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2020, 1 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Jayaram and T

    A. Jayaram and T. Speck, Europhysics Letters 143, 17005 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    G. S. Agarwal, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik A Hadrons and nu- clei 252, 25 (1972)

    1972

  39. [47]

    H.-M. Chun, X. Durang, and J. D. Noh, Physical Review E 97, 032117 (2018)

    2018

  40. [48]

    van Beijeren, Rev

    H. van Beijeren, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 195 (1982)

    1982

  41. [49]

    J. R. Dorfman, H. van Beijeren, and T. R. Kirkpatrick, Contemporary kinetic theory of matter (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2021)

    2021

  42. [50]

    Hargus, A

    C. Hargus, A. Deshpande, A. K. Omar, and K. K. Man- dadapu, Physical Review Letters 134, 097105 (2025)

    2025

  43. [51]

    B. C. van Zuiden, J. Paulose, W. T. M. Irvine, D. Bar- tolo, and V. Vitelli, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, 12919 (2016), 1606.03934

    2016 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Souslov, B

    A. Souslov, B. C. van Zuiden, D. Bartolo, and V. Vitelli, Nature Physics 13, 1091 (2017)

    2017

  45. [53]

    Dasbiswas, K

    K. Dasbiswas, K. K. Mandadapu, and S. Vaikun- tanathan, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences of the United States of America 115, E9031 (2018), 1706.04526

    2018 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Q. Yang, H. Zhu, P. Liu, R. Liu, Q. Shi, K. Chen, N. Zheng, F. Ye, and M. Yang, Physical Review Let- ters 126, 198001 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    H. D. Vuijk, J. U. Sommer, H. Merlitz, J. M. Brader, and A. Sharma, Physical Review Research 2, 013320 (2020), 1908.02577

    2020 arXiv

  48. [56]

    E. Kalz, H. D. Vuijk, J.-U. Sommer, R. Metzler, and A. Sharma, Physical Review Letters 132, 057102 (2024)

    2024

  49. [57]

    Vega Reyes, M

    F. Vega Reyes, M. A. L´ opez-Casta˜ no, and´A. Rodr ´ ıguez- Rivas, Communications Physics 5, 1 (2022), 2202.08920

    2022 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Caprini and U

    L. Caprini and U. M. B. Marconi, Soft Matter 15, 2627 (2019)

    2019

  51. [59]

    Caprini, H

    L. Caprini, H. L¨ owen, and U. M. B. Marconi, Soft Matter 19, 6234 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    H. Li, H. Chat´ e, M. Sano, X.-q. Shi, and H. P. Zhang, Physical Review X 14, 041006 (2024)

    2024

  53. [61]

    Wittmann, I

    R. Wittmann, I. Abdoli, A. Sharma, and J. M. Brader, (2024), 10.48550/arXiv.2410.21087, 2410.21087

    2024 doi arXiv

  54. [62]

    Saintillan, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 50, 563 (2018)

    D. Saintillan, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 50, 563 (2018)

    2018

  55. [63]

    J. Shea, G. Jung, and F. Schmid, Soft Matter 20, 1767 (2024)

    2024

  56. [64]

    Y. Baek, A. P. Solon, X. Xu, N. Nikola, and Y. Kafri, Physical Review Letters 120, 1 (2018)

    2018

  57. [65]

    Granek, Y

    O. Granek, Y. Kafri, M. Kardar, S. Ro, J. Tailleur, and A. Solon, Reviews of Modern Physics 96, 031003 (2024)

    2024

  58. [66]

    S. J. Plimpton, Journal of computational physics 117, 1 (1995), see also http://lammps.sandia.gov/

    1995

  59. [67]

    7 End Matter FIG

    Simulation and analysis code is publicly available, www.github.com/chargus/chiral-active-bath. 7 End Matter FIG. 6. Disk odd transport (a) The odd mobility µ⊥ is maximized when the gyroradius ℓg of the bath is of the order of the disk diameter ℓdisk. Error bands give 95% confi...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.