Studying Effective String Theory using deep generative models

Alessandro Nada; Elia Cellini; Michele Caselle

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 49 references

Studying Effective String Theory using deep generative models

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Deep generative models reproduce the Nambu-Goto string width to next-to-leading order and confirm the resummed high-temperature string tension.

desk verdict Useful proceedings: CNF and SNF fits confirm the two-loop width and resummed tension, but the 'numerical proof' language is overblown and the SNF branch lacks sampler diagnostics. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.20610 v1 pith:RAH53LKZ submitted 2025-08-28 hep-lat cs.LGhep-th

Michele Caselle , Elia Cellini , Alessandro Nada This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-latcs.LGhep-th

keywords effectivestringtheoryNambu-Gotofluxtubewidthnormalizingflowsstochasticlatticegaugetensionresummationconfinement

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that flow-based deep generative samplers can solve a problem in effective string theory that analytic methods cannot: computing the width of the confining flux tube. Working with the lattice Nambu-Goto action in 2+1 dimensions, it uses continuous normalizing flows at large string tension to verify the two-loop prediction for the width, and stochastic normalizing flows at small tension to test a conjectured resummation of the temperature-dependent string tension. If the results hold, numerical EST calculations become feasible in regimes where standard Monte Carlo suffers critical slowing down, and the width observable can be used to probe the temperature dependence of confinement.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the lattice Nambu-Goto action in physical gauge, S_NG = σ Σ_x [√(1+(∂φ)²/σ)−1], with the transverse field φ obeying periodic boundary conditions in time and Dirichlet conditions at the two Polyakov loops; the width observable σw²=⟨φ²⟩; and flow-based samplers (continuous and stochastic normalizing flows) trained by minimizing the reverse KL divergence, with observables recovered through importance-sampling reweighting. The argument is carried by two fit ansätze: eq. (8), which separates the universal coefficients b=1/4 and a1=π/6 from non-universal constants, and eq. (11), whose parameter f0 is predicted to be π/3 through the identity σ/σ(L)=1/√(1−π/(3σL²)).

What would settle it

Compute the effective sample size and largest importance weight of the SNF run at σ=0.1 for representative (L,R); if the weight distribution is dominated by a few samples (small effective sample size), the fitted f0 cannot be trusted as a target-distribution estimate. An independent check would be to estimate σw² at one (σ=0.1,L,R) point with an unbiased sampler (e.g. long MCMC) and compare within errors.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central result is numerical: for a L×R lattice Nambu-Goto string with periodic and Dirichlet boundary conditions, the width σw²=⟨φ²(x0,R/2)⟩ grows linearly in R with coefficient bR/L, with b=0.25007(4) matching the expected 1/4, and the next-to-leading correction is a1=0.55(5), matching π/6. At string tension σ=0.1, a stochastic-normalizing-flow fit to f(L)=1/(4L)(1/√(1−f0/(σL²))+f1) gives f0=1.01(9), matching the conjectured π/3≈1.047. This is interpreted as a numerical proof of the conjectured resummation σ(L)=σ√(1−π/(3σL²)) for the effective string tension at high temperature.

Load-bearing premise

The small-tension SNF results assume the trained sampler represents the target string distribution closely enough that importance-sampling estimates of the width are unbiased; the paper reports the fitted agreement but not effective sample sizes, autocorrelation times, or overlap diagnostics that would demonstrate this.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The width of the Nambu-Goto string in 2+1 dimensions is confirmed to broaden linearly with quark separation, coefficient R/(4L), with a next-to-leading correction π/(6σL²).
The string tension's temperature dependence is captured by σ(L)=σ√(1−π/(3σL²)); this resummed form, not just its low-order expansion, is consistent with the measured width.
Stochastic normalizing flows reach string tensions (σ=0.1) where continuous normalizing flows and conventional MCMC become impractical, opening that regime to numerical EST studies.
The generative-sampling approach can be extended to other EST observables, such as the shape of the flux tube, higher-order corrections to the Nambu-Goto action, and 3+1 dimensional gauge theories.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The fitted form for σ(L) would make the width's linear coefficient diverge as L approaches sqrt(π/(3σ)) from above, giving a sharp 'flux-tube delocalization' signal at the deconfinement scale; the paper does not explore this consequence directly.
The σ=0.1 confirmation rests on a single coupling value; a decisive strengthening would be to report the importance-weight distribution and effective sample size, turning a one-point match into a curve-level test of the resummation across several σ and L values.
The same SNF pipeline could measure observables other than the width at small tension—such as the intrinsic width or shape profile—to see whether the square-root behavior is universal or specific to the Nambu-Goto action.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: the paper is a short proceedings that does what it claims—CNFs reproduce the two-loop width and SNFs reproduce the resummed string tension—and the fits are clean. The main weakness is that it calls this a 'numerical proof,' and the SNF branch omits sampler diagnostics that would support that strong word.

What is actually new: the CNF-based NLO test (fig. 2, table 1) appears new, though it is a natural extension of the authors' earlier CNF paper [16]. The SNF part (fig. 3, table 2) largely overlaps with their prior publication [17], which already reported width and shape from SNFs. For a proceedings, that is a real issue: the paper does not explicitly say which numbers are new, so the reader has to cross-check the references to find the incremental content.

The soft spots are the ones the reader flagged. At sigma=0.1, the SNF importance-sampling estimate relies on eq. (7), which is unbiased only in the infinite-sample limit. The paper gives no effective sample size, no autocorrelation, no overlap measure. The target is strongly non-Gaussian at that coupling, and a modest under-sampling of tails would shift —and hence f0—by about 0.1, which is exactly the distance between the fitted 1.01(9) and pi/3. The authors may have checked all of this, but the absence of any diagnostic makes the agreement self-certifying rather than demonstrated. That is a fair concern.

The 'numerical proof' in the conclusion is also too strong. A single coupling and lattice spacing, with parameters extracted from a fit, is evidence, not proof. The CNF branch is less vulnerable because sigma >= 5 is easier for the sampler, but even there the NLO quantity in eq. (9) uses best-fit values; the comparison to the analytic prediction is external, so it is not circular, but the plotted errors do not include the parameter uncertainties.

On the credit side, the fits are good (chi2/dof near 1), the results agree with predictions, and the paper gives a clear, accessible introduction to EST and normalizing flows. If the authors add a statement about sampler quality and soften the proof language, this is a fine proceedings contribution. If it is aimed at a journal, it would need ESS or overlap diagnostics and a clear novelty statement relative to [17]. Either way, it deserves referee attention, but with expectations of revision.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the lattice-regularized Nambu-Goto effective string theory (EST) in 2+1 dimensions using deep generative samplers. The authors use Continuous Normalizing Flows (CNFs) at moderate string tensions (σ ≥ 5) to compute the flux-tube width σw² as a function of R, L, and σ, fitting the data to Eq. (8) and finding b = 0.25007(4) and a(1) = 0.55(5), consistent with the expected 1/4 and π/6. Using Stochastic Normalizing Flows (SNFs) at σ = 0.1, they fit the linear-in-R coefficient f(L) to Eq. (11) and obtain f0 = 1.01(9), consistent with the conjectured value π/3 ≈ 1.047. The paper concludes that these results provide a numerical test of the two-loop width and a numerical proof of the resummed string tension conjecture in ref. [41], Eq. (4).

Significance. If correct, the results would demonstrate that flow-based samplers can access the strongly coupled, high-temperature regime of lattice EST where standard MCMC suffers from critical slowing down, and would provide a nontrivial check of the two-loop width and of the temperature-resummed string tension. The numerical data are generated independently from the lattice action, and the analytic predictions (1/4, π/6, π/3) are external to the fitting procedure, so the comparison is meaningful. However, the confirmation is obtained by fitting the very coefficients that are then compared with the analytic values, and the decisive σ = 0.1 SNF result lacks reported sampling-quality diagnostics. The claim of a 'numerical proof' is stronger than the evidence supports. With the requested diagnostics and a tempered conclusion, the paper would be a useful contribution to the EST and machine-learning lattice communities.

major comments (3)

[Section 4, SNF results and Eq. (7)] The central σ = 0.1 result, from which f0 = 1.01(9) is extracted, rests on importance-sampling estimates of ⟨φ²⟩. Eq. (7) is unbiased only in the infinite-sample limit; for finite samples, the reliability is controlled by the overlap between qθ and the target p, measured by effective sample size, autocorrelation times, or similar diagnostics. The paper reports none of these for any (L,R) point, nor any independent sampler cross-check. At σ = 0.1 the target is strongly non-Gaussian, and ⟨φ²⟩ is sensitive to tail contributions; a modest overlap deficiency could shift f0 by O(0.1), comparable to the difference between 1.01 and π/3 ≈ 1.047. The agreement with the conjecture is therefore not self-certifying. Please report ESS/overlap diagnostics or provide an independent cross-check at least at one parameter point.
[Section 4, Eq. (9) and Table 1] The NLO quantity ⟨σw²_NLO⟩_R is constructed using best-fit values of b, c, d, and a(0) from the same dataset that is then compared with the analytic prediction. Because Eq. (8) already assumes a factorized form in which the NLO correction multiplies the entire R/L + c + d log L term, the extraction of a(1) is tied to that ansatz. If the factorization is not exact, the residual can be biased toward π/(6σL²). Moreover, the statistical errors on b,c,d,a(0) are not propagated into Eq. (9). A parameter-free construction, or at least a jackknife/bootstrap propagation of the fitted coefficients, would make the NLO comparison more convincing.
[Section 5 (Conclusion) and Section 4] The statement that the SNF results provide a 'numerical proof' of the conjecture in ref. [41] overstates the evidence. The test is performed at a single lattice spacing (a = 1), a single string tension σ = 0.1, and finite L and R, with no continuum extrapolation and no systematic check of finite-volume or regularization effects. The fitted f0 = 1.01(9) is consistent with π/3, but consistency at one parameter point is evidence, not proof. I recommend rewording to 'strong numerical evidence' or 'first numerical test'.

minor comments (5)

[Eq. (1)] The action contains (∂x0 φ(x))² twice; the second should presumably be (∂x1 φ(x))².
[Section 3] Typo: 'divercence' should be 'divergence'; 'The training procedure in done' should be 'is done'.
[Eq. (7)] The notation '∫ d p(φ) φ O(φ)' is malformed; it should be an integral of p(φ)O(φ) with respect to the appropriate measure.
[Eqs. (2) and (5)] Eq. (2) defines σw², but Eq. (5) writes w² without the factor σ. Please clarify the notation consistently.
[Table 2 and Fig. 3] The fit reports χ²_red = 0.47 but no number of degrees of freedom or number of L values; the correlation between f0 and f1 is not given. In Fig. 3, 'PI-SNF' is not defined in the text or caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: fitted parameters are compared against independent analytic predictions, and the SNF/CNF data are generated from the lattice Nambu-Goto action rather than from the conjectured resummation.

full rationale

The paper's central numerical results are fits to independently generated lattice data. In eq. (8), b, a(0), a(1), c, and d are free parameters; the resulting b = 0.25007(4) and a(1) = 0.55(5) are compared with the external analytic values 1/4 and pi/6 from refs. [38-40], so the agreement is not forced by construction. Similarly, eq. (11) introduces f0 and f1 as fit parameters, and f0 = 1.01(9) is compared with the conjectured pi/3 rather than derived from it. The conjecture in ref. [41] is a self-citation by one of the authors, but it is used only as the target of a numerical test; the data are produced by sampling the lattice-regularized Nambu-Goto action, not by imposing the conjectured formula. The residual plot in fig. 2 does use best-fit values b, c, d, and a(0) to normalize the data, but the plotted quantity still contains the raw width data and is compared with the independent two-loop prediction; it is a visualization of the same fit rather than a separate circular input. The absence of effective-sample-size or autocorrelation diagnostics for the SNF branch is a legitimate statistical-validity concern, but it is not a circularity of the derivation: a biased sampler would be a numerical error, not a logical reduction of the claim to its inputs. Therefore no circular step meeting the required evidentiary standard can be identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on seven fitted parameters, several of which are compared directly to the analytic predictions being tested. The physics axioms are standard for EST simulations, but the unbiasedness of the samplers is assumed without reported diagnostics. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (7)

a(0) = 0.991(2)
Fitted in eq. (8) as a non-universal 1/sigma correction to the width.
a(1) = 0.55(5)
Fitted in eq. (8); compared to the two-loop prediction pi/6 = 0.5236.
b = 0.25007(4)
Fitted in eq. (8); compared to the leading prediction 1/4 = 0.25.
c = -0.032(1)
Fitted in eq. (8); non-universal constant term.
d = 0.1579(5)
Fitted in eq. (8); compared to 1/(2 pi) = 0.159155.
f0 = 1.01(9)
Fitted in eq. (11); compared to the conjectured value pi/3 = 1.047.
f1 = 12.35(1)
Fitted in eq. (11) as an undetermined bulk constant, absorbs non-universal contributions.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The Nambu-Goto action in the physical gauge (eq. 1) is the correct effective string theory for the confining flux tube in 2+1 dimensional Yang-Mills.
Used throughout as the starting point for the lattice action and all numerical simulations.
domain assumption The lattice discretization with a = 1 and periodic temporal / Dirichlet spatial boundary conditions faithfully represents the continuum EST.
Invoked in section 2 when defining the lattice action and the width observable.
domain assumption Flow-based samplers trained by minimizing the reverse KL divergence can produce unbiased estimates via importance sampling reweighting.
Section 3 relies on the unbiased estimator of eq. (7) without providing convergence diagnostics.
standard math The Jarzynski equality holds for stochastic normalizing flows and provides unbiased estimators.
Mentioned in section 3 as the generalization of importance sampling for SNFs.
domain assumption The high-temperature regime R >> L and the perturbative expansion in eq. (3) are valid for the simulated lattice sizes.
Used to motivate the fit functions in eqs. (8) and (11).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Studying Effective String Theory using deep generative models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RAH53LKZ

@misc{pith2026250820610,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Studying Effective String Theory using deep generative models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RAH53LKZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20610}
}

read the original abstract

Effective String Theory (EST) offers a robust non-perturbative framework for describing confinement in Yang-Mills theory by treating the confining flux tube between a static quark-antiquark pair as a thin, vibrating string. While EST calculations are typically carried out using zeta-function regularization, certain problems-such as determining the flux tube width-are too complex to solve analytically. However, recent studies have demonstrated that EST can be explored numerically by employing deep learning techniques based on generative algorithms. In this work, we provide a brief introduction to EST and this novel numerical approach. Finally, we present results for the width of the Nambu-Got\"o EST.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.20610 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Plot of 𝜎𝑤2 as a function of 𝑅, with 𝜎 = 100.0 for various values of 𝐿. The dotted lines indicate the best fit, while the error bars are smaller than the data points. On the other hand, using SNFs, we could overcome the scaling issues of the CNFs, and reach small values of 𝜎. With this setup, we performed a study with 𝜎 = 0.1, we fitted the 𝑅 dependence of our results with the following expression: 𝜎𝑤2 (𝐿, 𝑅) = 𝑓 (𝐿… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Plot of ⟨𝜎𝑤2 𝑁 𝐿𝑂⟩𝑅 as a function of 𝜎 for three different values of 𝐿, compared with the expected analytical solution 𝜋 6𝜎𝐿2 . Then, we fit 𝐿 the coefficient 𝑓 (𝐿) using 𝑓 (𝐿) = 1 4𝐿 © « 1 √︃ 1 − 𝑓0 𝜎𝐿2 + 𝑓1 ª ® ® ¬ (11) where 𝑓1 is an undetermined bulk constant and 𝑓0, should take the conjectured value 𝜋/3. Results of the fit are reported in table 2. The results 𝑓0 = 1.01(9) remarkably agrees with the conjectu… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Numerical results for the term 𝜎/𝜎(𝐿) computed from the coefficient 𝑓 (𝑙) by removing the non-universal term 𝑓1 and multiplying by 4𝐿. The solid line represents the conjectured value from eq. (4). future application is the extension of our approach to the 𝑑 = 3 + 1 case to study four-dimensional lattice gauge theories and the so-called axionic string [47, 48]. Another interesting candidate for further numerical stud… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

[16]

Caselle, E

M. Caselle, E. Cellini and A. Nada,Sampling the lattice Nambu-Goto string using Continuous Normalizing Flows, JHEP02(2024) 048 [2307.01107]

arXiv 2024
[17]

Caselle, E

M. Caselle, E. Cellini and A. Nada,Numerical determination of the width and shape of the effective string using Stochastic Normalizing Flows,JHEP 02(2025) 090 [2409.15937]

arXiv 2025
[41]

Caselle,Flux tube delocalization at the deconfinement point,JHEP08 (2010) 063 [1004.3875]

M. Caselle,Flux tube delocalization at the deconfinement point,JHEP08 (2010) 063 [1004.3875]

arXiv 2010
[1]

J. A. Mickley, C. Allton, R. Bignell and D. B. Leinweber,Center vortex evidence for a second finite-temperature QCD transition, Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 034508 [2411.19446]

arXiv 2025
[2]

Crean, J

X. Crean, J. Giansiracusa and B. Lucini,Topological data analysis of monopole current networks in𝑈(1) lattice gauge theory, SciPost Phys.17 (2024) 100 [2403.07739]

arXiv 2024
[3]

D. R. Junior and L. E. Oxman,Ensembles of center vortices and chains: Insights from a natural lattice framework, 2411.04325. 7 Studying Effective String Theory using deep generative models Elia Cellini

work page Pith review arXiv
[4]

J. A. Mickley, D. B. Leinweber and D. Nogradi,Center vortices and theSU(3) conformal window, 2501.11279

work page arXiv
[5]

Nambu,Strings, Monopoles and Gauge Fields,Phys

Y. Nambu,Strings, Monopoles and Gauge Fields,Phys. Rev.D10 (1974) 4262

work page 1974

Show all 49 references

[6]

Goto,Relativistic quantum mechanics of one-dimensional mechanical continuum and subsidiary condition of dual resonance model,Prog

T. Goto,Relativistic quantum mechanics of one-dimensional mechanical continuum and subsidiary condition of dual resonance model,Prog. Theor. Phys.46 (1971) 1560

1971
[7]

Luscher,Symmetry Breaking Aspects of the Roughening Transition in Gauge Theories, Nucl

M. Luscher,Symmetry Breaking Aspects of the Roughening Transition in Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys.B180(1981) 317

1981
[8]

Luscher, K

M. Luscher, K. Symanzik and P. Weisz,Anomalies of the Free Loop Wave Equation in the WKB Approximation, Nucl. Phys.B173(1980) 365

1980
[9]

Polchinski and A

J. Polchinski and A. Strominger,Effective string theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.67 (1991) 1681

1991
[10]

Aharony and Z

O. Aharony and Z. Komargodski,The Effective Theory of Long Strings,JHEP05(2013) 118 [1302.6257]

2013 arXiv
[11]

B. B. Brandt and M. Meineri,Effective string description of confining flux tubes,Int. J. Mod. Phys.A31 (2016) 1643001 [1603.06969]

2016 arXiv
[12]

Caselle,Effective String Description of the Confining Flux Tube at Finite Temperature, Universe7 (2021) 170 [2104.10486]

M. Caselle,Effective String Description of the Confining Flux Tube at Finite Temperature, Universe7 (2021) 170 [2104.10486]

2021 arXiv
[13]

Caristo, M

F. Caristo, M. Caselle, N. Magnoli, A. Nada, M. Panero and A. Smecca,Fine corrections in the effective string describing SU(2) Yang-Mills theory in three dimensions,JHEP03 (2022) 115 [2109.06212]

2022 arXiv
[14]

Baffigo and M

A. Baffigo and M. Caselle,Ising string beyond the Nambu-Goto action, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 034520 [2306.06966]

2024 arXiv
[15]

Caselle, N

M. Caselle, N. Magnoli, A. Nada, M. Panero, D. Panfalone and L. Verzichelli,Confining strings in three-dimensional gauge theories beyond the Nambu-Got¯o approximation,JHEP 08 (2024) 198 [2407.10678]

2024 arXiv
[18]

Rezende and S

D. Rezende and S. Mohamed,Variational inference with normalizing flows, inInternational conference on machine learning, p. 1530, PMLR, 2015

2015
[19]

M. C. Bañuls et al.,Simulating Lattice Gauge Theories within Quantum Technologies, Eur. Phys. J. D74(2020) 165 [1911.00003]. 8 Studying Effective String Theory using deep generative models Elia Cellini

2020 arXiv
[20]

Crippa, K

A. Crippa, K. Jansen and E. Rinaldi,Analysis of the confinement string in (2 + 1)-dimensional Quantum Electrodynamics with a trapped-ion quantum computer, 2411.05628

arXiv
[21]

M. S. Albergo, G. Kanwar and P. E. Shanahan,Flow-based generative models for markov chain monte carlo in lattice field theory,Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 034515

2019
[22]

K. A. Nicoli, S. Nakajima, N. Strodthoff, W. Samek, K.-R. Müller and P. Kessel, Asymptotically unbiased estimation of physical observables with neural samplers, Phys. Rev. E 101 (2020) 023304 [1910.13496]

2020 arXiv
[23]

K. A. Nicoli, C. J. Anders, L. Funcke, T. Hartung, K. Jansen, P. Kessel et al.,Estimation of thermodynamic observables in lattice field theories with deep generative models, Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 032001

2021
[24]

Del Debbio, J

L. Del Debbio, J. Marsh Rossney and M. Wilson,Efficient modeling of trivializing maps for lattice𝜙4 theory using normalizing flows: A first look at scalability, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 094507

2021
[25]

Abbott, M

R. Abbott, M. S. Albergo, D. Boyda, K. Cranmer, D. C. Hackett, G. Kanwar et al., Gauge-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 074506

2022
[26]

Abbott et al.,Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space-time dimension, 2305.02402

R. Abbott et al.,Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space-time dimension, 2305.02402

arXiv
[27]

Caselle, G

M. Caselle, G. Costagliola, A. Nada, M. Panero and A. Toniato,Jarzynski’s theorem for lattice gauge theory,Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 034503 [1604.05544]

2016 arXiv
[28]

Caselle, A

M. Caselle, A. Nada and M. Panero,QCD thermodynamics from lattice calculations with nonequilibrium methods: The SU(3) equation of state, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 054513 [1801.03110]

2018 arXiv
[29]

Francesconi, M

O. Francesconi, M. Panero and D. Preti,Strong coupling from non-equilibrium Monte Carlo simulations,JHEP07 (2020) 233 [2003.13734]

2020 arXiv
[30]

Bulgarelli and M

A. Bulgarelli and M. Panero,Entanglement entropy from non-equilibrium Monte Carlo simulations,JHEP06 (2023) 030 [2304.03311]

2023 arXiv
[31]

Bulgarelli and M

A. Bulgarelli and M. Panero,Duality transformations and the entanglement entropy of gauge theories, JHEP06(2024) 041 [2404.01987]

2024 arXiv
[32]

Bonanno, A

C. Bonanno, A. Nada and D. Vadacchino,Mitigating topological freezing using out-of-equilibrium simulations,JHEP 04(2024) 126 [2402.06561]

2024 arXiv
[33]

Vadacchino, A

D. Vadacchino, A. Nada and C. Bonanno,Topological susceptibility of SU(3) pure-gauge theory from out-of-equilibrium simulations,PoSLATTICE2024(2025) 415 [2411.00620]. 9 Studying Effective String Theory using deep generative models Elia Cellini

2025 arXiv
[34]

H. Wu, J. Köhler and F. Noé,Stochastic normalizing flows, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems33 (2020) 5933 [2002.06707]

2020 arXiv
[35]

Caselle, E

M. Caselle, E. Cellini, A. Nada and M. Panero,Stochastic normalizing flows as non-equilibrium transformations,JHEP 07(2022) 015 [2201.08862]

2022 arXiv
[36]

Bulgarelli, E

A. Bulgarelli, E. Cellini, K. Jansen, S. Kühn, A. Nada, S. Nakajima et al.,Flow-based Sampling for Entanglement Entropy and the Machine Learning of Defects, 2410.14466

arXiv
[37]

Bulgarelli, E

A. Bulgarelli, E. Cellini and A. Nada,Scaling of Stochastic Normalizing Flows inSU(3) lattice gauge theory, 2412.00200

arXiv
[38]

Gliozzi, M

F. Gliozzi, M. Pepe and U. J. Wiese,Linear Broadening of the Confining String in Yang-Mills Theory at Low Temperature, JHEP01(2011) 057 [1010.1373]

2011 arXiv
[39]

Gliozzi, M

F. Gliozzi, M. Pepe and U. J. Wiese,The Width of the Color Flux Tube at 2-Loop Order, JHEP11 (2010) 053 [1006.2252]

2010 arXiv
[40]

Gliozzi, M

F. Gliozzi, M. Pepe and U. J. Wiese,The Width of the Confining String in Yang-Mills Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.104 (2010) 232001 [1002.4888]

2010 arXiv
[42]

Cranmer, G

K. Cranmer, G. Kanwar, S. Racanière, D. J. Rezende and P. E. Shanahan,Advances in machine-learning-based sampling motivated by lattice quantum chromodynamics, Nature Rev. Phys.5 (2023) 526 [2309.01156]

2023 arXiv
[43]

R. T. Chen, Y. Rubanova, J. Bettencourt and D. K. Duvenaud,Neural ordinary differential equations, Advances in neural information processing systems31(2018)

2018
[44]

Gerdes, P

M. Gerdes, P. de Haan, C. Rainone, R. Bondesan and M. C. N. Cheng,Learning lattice quantum field theories with equivariant continuous flows,SciPost Phys.15(2023) 238

2023
[45]

Jarzynski,Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences,Phys

C. Jarzynski,Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences,Phys. Rev. Lett.78 (1997) 2690

1997
[46]

Verzichelli, M

L. Verzichelli, M. Caselle, E. Cellini, A. Nada and D. Panfalone,Intrinsic width of the flux tube in 2+1 dimensional Yang-Mills theories, PoSLATTICE2024(2025) 403 [2501.01740]

2025 arXiv
[47]

Dubovsky and G

S. Dubovsky and G. Hernandez-Chifflet,Yang–Mills Glueballs as Closed Bosonic Strings, JHEP02 (2017) 022 [1611.09796]

2017 arXiv
[48]

Athenodorou, S

A. Athenodorou, S. Dubovsky, C. Luo and M. Teper,Confining Strings and the Worldsheet Axion from the Lattice, 2411.03435
[49]

Elias Miró, A

J. Elias Miró, A. L. Guerrieri, A. Hebbar, J. a. Penedones and P. Vieira,Flux Tube S-matrix Bootstrap,Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (2019) 221602 [1906.08098]. 10

2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [16]

Caselle, E

M. Caselle, E. Cellini and A. Nada,Sampling the lattice Nambu-Goto string using Continuous Normalizing Flows, JHEP02(2024) 048 [2307.01107]

arXiv 2024

[2] [17]

Caselle, E

M. Caselle, E. Cellini and A. Nada,Numerical determination of the width and shape of the effective string using Stochastic Normalizing Flows,JHEP 02(2025) 090 [2409.15937]

arXiv 2025

[3] [41]

Caselle,Flux tube delocalization at the deconfinement point,JHEP08 (2010) 063 [1004.3875]

M. Caselle,Flux tube delocalization at the deconfinement point,JHEP08 (2010) 063 [1004.3875]

arXiv 2010

[4] [1]

J. A. Mickley, C. Allton, R. Bignell and D. B. Leinweber,Center vortex evidence for a second finite-temperature QCD transition, Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 034508 [2411.19446]

arXiv 2025

[5] [2]

Crean, J

X. Crean, J. Giansiracusa and B. Lucini,Topological data analysis of monopole current networks in𝑈(1) lattice gauge theory, SciPost Phys.17 (2024) 100 [2403.07739]

arXiv 2024

[6] [3]

D. R. Junior and L. E. Oxman,Ensembles of center vortices and chains: Insights from a natural lattice framework, 2411.04325. 7 Studying Effective String Theory using deep generative models Elia Cellini

work page Pith review arXiv

[7] [4]

J. A. Mickley, D. B. Leinweber and D. Nogradi,Center vortices and theSU(3) conformal window, 2501.11279

work page arXiv

[8] [5]

Nambu,Strings, Monopoles and Gauge Fields,Phys

Y. Nambu,Strings, Monopoles and Gauge Fields,Phys. Rev.D10 (1974) 4262

work page 1974