Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

Self-force framework for merger-ringdown waveforms

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that the offline/online phase-space paradigm of gravitational self-force modeling extends through a binary's final plunge, so the merger-ringdown signal can be generated from the orbital dynamics alone, with a…

desk verdict A careful, honest implementation of the 0PG plunge waveform; the phase-space framework is the real contribution, but the 1PG extension that would make it 'systematically improvable' is not yet constructed. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02189 v1 pith:RCMZH5E6 submitted 2025-06-02 gr-qc

Lorenzo Küchler , Geoffrey Compère , Adam Pound This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc
keywords gravitationalself-forcemerger-ringdownwaveformsquasinormalmodesSchwarzschildblackholespost-geodesicexpansionstationary-phaseapproximationphase-spacewaveformgenerationsmall-mass-ratiobinaries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the phase-space "offline/online" paradigm of gravitational self-force modeling extends through the final plunge for quasicircular, nonspinning binaries. In that paradigm, waveform ingredients are precomputed as functions on the binary's orbital phase space, and the waveform is then generated rapidly by evolving through that space; previously this was limited to the inspiral and the transition to plunge. The plunge is handled with a new post-geodesic expansion, and at leading order the resulting waveform agrees with a stationary-phase approximation at early times and with a self-consistently computed quasinormal-mode sum at late times, but the paper highlights that neither approximation reaches the peak amplitude. If the framework is correct, it provides a systematically improvable route to fast and accurate inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms for the asymmetric binaries that next-generation gravitational-wave detectors are expected to observe.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the post-geodesic (nPG) expansion at fixed phase-space coordinates, preferably in the fixed-orbital-radius formulation, which stays a single coordinate chart across the light ring. The expansion is not self-contained: near-ISCO coefficients are fixed term by term by asymptotic matching to the late-time transition-to-plunge expansion, and the same matching is imposed on the fields through a puncture scheme effective near the ISCO. A Fourier transform built on the geodesic time and phase converts the phase-space Regge-Wheeler-Zerilli equations into ordinary frequency-domain equations, whose inverse transform is then analyzed in two ways: a stationary-phase approximation expressing the early waveform as an instantaneous function of the orbit, and a quasinormal-mode sum whose excitation coefficients are computed from the plunge source rather than fitted.

What would settle it

Compute the next post-geodesic order (2PG dynamics, or the 1PG waveform including the remnant-spin corrections) and compare against numerical relativity for a nonspinning, quasicircular binary near mass ratio 10: the paper's expectation that a complete 1PG model would be highly accurate near $\varepsilon \approx 1/10$ is refuted if the 1PG corrections do not remove most of the leading-order phase and amplitude error. Independently, the term-by-term matching conditions between the plunge and transition-to-plunge expansions either hold or fail at 2PG and higher PLT order, and a failure there would invalidate the systematic extension.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the final plunge, which radiates the merger-ringdown signal, can be described in the same phase-space language as the inspiral, with the waveform a function of the binary's mechanical variables all the way to the horizon. The essential step is a post-geodesic expansion of the motion and the field equations at fixed phase-space coordinates, completed by asymptotic matching to the late-time transition-to-plunge solution near the ISCO. At geodesic order all quasicircular inspirals pass onto one universal plunging geodesic, carrying the ISCO values of specific energy $E_* = 2\sqrt{2}/3$ and angular momentum $L_* = 2\sqrt{3}\,M$. Solving the first-order Regge-Wheeler-Zerilli equations on phase space yields a plunge waveform whose early part is well approximated by a stationary-phase evaluation and whose late part is well approximated by a quasinormal-mode sum with internally computed excitation coefficients; the paper shows that neither approximation captures the peak, so no stitching of an extended inspiral to a ringdown reproduces the full merger. The waveform phase remains a smooth function of the orbital phase-space variables through the peak, separating from the orbit only extremely close to the horizon.

Load-bearing premise

The framework assumes that the post-geodesic expansion at fixed phase-space coordinates, together with the term-by-term asymptotic matching between the late-time transition-to-plunge solution and the early-time plunge solution (verified only through 1PG and 7PLT order), completely determines the plunge dynamics and the field boundary conditions; if the matching fails at higher orders, or if the neglected early-time effective source near $r_P = 5.999M$ is not negligible for small mass ratios, the systematic extension beyond leading order fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Merger-ringdown waveforms for asymmetric binaries can be generated online by solving a small set of ordinary differential equations, preserving the millisecond-scale speed of inspiral self-force models through the merger and ringdown.
  • The same machinery extends beyond leading order: at 1PG order the dominant missing physics, the final black hole's spin, is expected to enter automatically through nonlinear couplings in the second-order field equations.
  • The stationary-phase and quasinormal-mode analyses sharpen the effective-one-body picture of an extended inspiral followed by ringdown, identifying a genuine merger interval, roughly ten to twenty $M$ around the peak, where neither approximation applies.
  • Hybridizing the inspiral, transition-to-plunge, and plunge forcing functions yields a complete inspiral-merger-ringdown model built from precomputed ingredients, with the plunge matched to the transition regime rather than merely stitched to a separately modeled ringdown.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • I infer that the smoothness of the waveform phase in the orbital phase-space variables through the peak suggests the "merger" is not a separate physical phase at leading order: a higher-order stationary-phase approximation could plausibly extend the orbit-based description past the peak, with the genuine dissociation confined to the late-time region where the quasinormal-mode description takes ove
  • The modular offline/online split suggests a testable extension: beyond-general-relativity or environmental corrections could be precomputed as phase-space functions and added to the online merger-ringdown generation without recomputing the plunge dynamics.
  • A natural quantitative test of the framework's practical value would be a full IMR model built from the 0PG (and eventually 1PG) plunge, evaluated against numerical relativity across mass ratios from $1{:}10$ down to $1{:}100$; the paper's comparison is qualitative and confined to a few aligned modes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper develops a post-geodesic, phase-space framework for the final plunge of a small, nonspinning body into a Schwarzschild black hole, with the aim of extending the gravitational self-force offline/online paradigm from inspiral and transition-to-plunge through merger and ringdown. It derives plunge orbital equations at zeroth and first post-geodesic order in both fixed-frequency and fixed-radius formulations, performs an asymptotic match to the late-time transition-to-plunge solution through 1PG/7PLT order, and derives phase-space field equations through second order in the mass ratio. The numerical implementation computes leading-order (0PG) Regge-Wheeler-Zerilli plunge waveforms using a frequency-domain Green function, a puncture truncated at constant order with rP = 5.999M, and a discrete inverse Fourier transform. The paper validates the implementation through convergence checks, compares the full waveform with stationary-phase and quasinormal-mode approximations, and makes qualitative comparisons with numerical relativity simulations.

Significance. The leading-order implementation is a well-executed and internally consistent piece of work: the convergence in frequency sampling and cutoff is quantified, the excitation coefficients agree with independent calculations by Hadar-Kol and Folacci-Ould El Hadj to roughly 1e-4, and the paper gives a clear demonstration that neither the SPA nor a QNM sum reaches the waveform peak. The framework, if it can be carried beyond leading order, would establish a systematically improvable route to fast inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms for asymmetric binaries, and the public ancillary notebooks are a strength for reproducibility. However, the 1PG extension that would substantiate the advertised systematic improvability is not implemented, and the puncture treatment on which it depends is explicitly deferred to future work. The paper's significance is therefore partly prospective: it demonstrates a workable leading-order construction and identifies the missing ingredients for the claimed extension, rather than establishing the extension itself.

major comments (2)
  1. [5.2] The claim that the framework is systematically improvable beyond leading order is not supported by the present implementation. The 1PG orbital equations (3.26) or (3.48) require the first-order plunge self-force f^mu_{1} on the whole domain 2M < rp < 6M, and f^mu_{1} is never computed in this paper. The implementation truncates the puncture at constant order in Eq. (5.17), neglects the extended effective source (5.22), and sets rP = 5.999M in Sec. 6.1, so the near-ISCO piece of h_{1} that would source f^mu_{1} and fix the coefficients in Eqs. (A.18)-(A.20) is missing. The paper itself acknowledges this in Sec. 7, where it states that a 1PG calculation will require a more thorough treatment of the effective source because the 0PG field is needed all the way back to the ISCO. This is a load-bearing gap for the Introduction's claim that the method 'can be systematically applied beyond leading order'; the present paper establishes the leading-order waveform but not the systematic 1PG extension.
  2. [5.2] The neglect of the extended effective source is not justified quantitatively at the finite value rP = 5.999M used for the production waveforms. Appendix E shows that one particular contribution vanishes faster than any power as rP tends to 6M at fixed rp, and Fig. 7 shows that moving rP from 5.99M to 5.999M changes the (2,2) waveform by ~1e-8 in the window -750M < tG < 100M, but neither test bounds the size of the neglected source itself at finite rP or for higher ℓ modes. Since the same puncture region is the path to f^mu_{1} at 1PG order, a quantitative estimate of the omitted contribution is needed before the systematic-extension claim can be regarded as demonstrated.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Tables 3, 4] Several entries in the excitation-coefficient tables appear to have typographical exponent glitches, for example the ℓ=2, m=-2, n=1 entry in Table 3; the authors should check all numerical exponents carefully.
  2. [Sec. 2] The notation (n), [n], and {n} for post-adiabatic, post-leading-transition, and post-geodesic orders is defined in the text but used very heavily across the paper; a compact summary table of conventions would substantially improve readability.
  3. [Fig. 5] The caption of Fig. 5 describes relative differences for several sampling intervals without clearly labeling which curve corresponds to which Δω value in a legend; adding explicit labels to the figure would make the convergence behavior easier to read.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the 0PG plunge waveform is derived from independent RWZ equations and benchmarks, with self-citations to earlier transition-to-plunge work serving as context rather than as a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central waveform result, Eq. (5.40), is obtained by solving the frequency-domain Regge-Wheeler-Zerilli equation (5.27) with the point-particle source (5.10) and a retarded Green function (5.32), followed by an inverse Fourier transform. The QNM frequencies are taken from external references [92,99,100], the excitation factors from [94], and the radial ``in'' solution is checked against the Black Hole Perturbation Toolkit. No parameter is fitted to the output waveform: the SPA and QNM sum are derived from the same integral by stationary-phase and residue techniques, and their agreement with the full waveform is an internal consistency check, not an input. The comparison to NR uses only standard time/phase alignment, which does not constitute fitting the model's prediction. The paper's self-citations to [43,48,49,50,51] are used to import the previously derived transition-to-plunge expansion and matching conditions; these are published, parameter-free results and are not equivalent to the plunge waveform's construction. Moreover, the 0PG plunge dynamics themselves are derived from geodesic equations and ISCO boundary values, not from the transition-to-plunge waveform. The asymptotic matching fixes integration constants and restricts powers, but it does not impose the waveform shape. The acknowledged incompleteness of the 1PG puncture treatment (Sec. 5.2 and the related discussion) is a completeness gap for future work, not a circular step: the paper explicitly states that the extended effective source is neglected and that a complete implementation is deferred. Therefore the derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks and shows no reduction of the claimed predictions to the paper's own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No invented physical entities are introduced. The central claim at 0PG order uses no physical free parameters; the only hand-chosen numerical parameter is the puncture radius rP. The axioms are standard black hole perturbation theory plus the authors' phase-space expansion assumption, with the latter being the main unproved premise.

free parameters (1)
  • Puncture cutoff radius rP = 5.999M
    Chosen by hand in Sec. 6.1 to truncate the puncture region just below the ISCO. The paper shows the waveform in the central window is insensitive to rP at the 1e-8 level, but the early-time domain where the extended source is neglected depends on this choice.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The self-consistent second-order self-force equations (2.1)-(2.3) correctly describe the binary dynamics.
    Invoked at the beginning of Sec. 2.1; these are established results from prior literature, not re-derived here.
  • ad hoc to paper The metric perturbation and orbital variables are functions on phase space, so that the time derivative is replaced by the phase-space operator in Eq. (4.1).
    This is the foundational multiscale and phase-space assumption of the authors' framework, stated in Sec. 2.2 and used in Eq. (4.1); its validity in the plunge is what the paper aims to establish.
  • domain assumption The late-time transition-to-plunge expansion and the early-time plunge expansion match term by term, fixing the underdetermined plunge dynamics.
    Used in Secs. 3.2 and 5.2 to select the correct geodesic and boundary conditions; verified to 1PG/7PLT order, but assumed for all orders.
  • standard math At 0PG order, the plunge follows the universal geodesic with ISCO energy and angular momentum E*=2√2/3, L*=2√3M.
    Derived in Sec. 3.1.2 from the matching; a known result for Schwarzschild geodesics.
  • standard math The frequency-domain Green function and the quasinormal-mode sum provide a complete representation of the RWZ solution for the plunge source.
    Standard black hole perturbation theory used in Secs. 5.4 and 5.6; the omission of branch-cut and high-frequency arc contributions is a stated limitation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Self-force framework for merger-ringdown waveforms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RCMZH5E6

@misc{pith2026250602189,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Self-force framework for merger-ringdown waveforms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RCMZH5E6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02189}
}
read the original abstract

The prospect of observing asymmetric compact binaries with next-generation gravitational-wave detectors has motivated the development of fast and accurate waveform models in gravitational self-force theory. These models are based on a two-stage process: in a (slow) offline stage, waveform ingredients are pre-computed as functions on the orbital phase space; in a (fast) online stage, the waveform is generated by evolving through the phase space. While this framework has traditionally been restricted to the inspiral stage of a binary, we recently extended it across the transition to plunge, where the small companion crosses the innermost stable circular orbit around the primary black hole. In this paper, for the special case of quasicircular, nonspinning binaries, we show how the "offline/online" phase-space paradigm also extends through the final plunge, which generates the binary's merger-ringdown signal. We implement the method at leading, geodesic order in the plunge. The resulting plunge waveform agrees well with a stationary-phase approximation at early times and with a (self-consistently calculated) quasinormal mode sum at late times, but we highlight that neither of the two approximations reaches the peak of the full plunge waveform. Finally, we compare the plunge waveform to numerical relativity simulations. Our framework offers the prospect of fast, accurate inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform models for asymmetric binaries.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The significance of first post-adiabatic contributions for scalar charge measurements with intermediate and extreme mass ratio inspirals

    gr-qc 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5 of 10

    Neglecting 1PA gravitational self-force biases intrinsic EMRI parameters while scalar-charge inference remains robust; pure-GR templates produce large biases and underestimated errors on charged signals.

  2. LISA and the LISA Science Team

    astro-ph.IM 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A review of LISA mission status, science objectives, waveform-modeling needs, and the LISA Science Team's working groups as of December 2025.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

141 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [81]

    Universal Waveforms for Extreme Mass-Ratio Inspiral,

    I. Strusberg, B. Rom, and R. Sari, “Universal Waveforms for Extreme Mass-Ratio Inspiral,” 2505.07941

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al. , “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016), no. 6, 061102, 1602.03837

    arXiv 2016

  3. [2]

    GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs,

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al. , “GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs,” Phys. Rev. X 9 (2019), no. 3, 031040, 1811.12907

    arXiv 2019

  4. [3]

    GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run,

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, R. Abbott et al. , “GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run,” Phys. Rev. X 11 (2021) 021053, 2010.14527

    arXiv 2021

  5. [4]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run,

    KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific Collaboration, R. Abbott et al. , “GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run,” Phys. Rev. X 13 (2023), no. 4, 041039, 2111.03606

    arXiv 2023

  6. [5]

    Science Case for the Einstein Telescope,

    ET Collaboration, M. Maggiore et al. , “Science Case for the Einstein Telescope,” JCAP 03 (2020) 050, 1912.02622

    arXiv 2020

  7. [6]

    A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community,

    M. Evans et al. , “A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community,” 2109.09882

    arXiv

  8. [7]

    Gravitational-wave detection rates for compact binaries formed in isolation: LIGO/Virgo O3 and beyond,

    V. Baibhav, E. Berti, D. Gerosa, M. Mapelli, N. Giacobbo, Y. Bouffanais, and U. N. Di Carlo, “Gravitational-wave detection rates for compact binaries formed in isolation: LIGO/Virgo O3 and beyond,” Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019), no. 6, 064060, 1906.04197

    arXiv 2019

Show all 141 references
  1. [8]

    The Next Generation Global Gravitational Wave Observatory: The Science Book,

    V. Kalogera et al. , “The Next Generation Global Gravitational Wave Observatory: The Science Book,” 2111.06990

    arXiv

  2. [9]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,

    P. Amaro-Seoane et al. , “Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,” 1702.00786

    arXiv

  3. [10]

    Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals,

    S. Babak, J. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, C. F. Sopuerta, C. P. L. Berry, E. Berti, P. Amaro-Seoane, A. Petiteau, and A. Klein, “Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals,” Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017), no. 10, 103012, 1703.09722

    2017 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Astrophysics with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,

    LISA Collaboration, P. A. Seoane et al. , “Astrophysics with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,” Living Rev. Rel. 26 (2023), no. 1, 2, 2203.06016

    2023 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Massive Black Hole Merger Rates: The Effect of Kiloparsec Separation Wandering and Supernova Feedback,

    E. Barausse, I. Dvorkin, M. Tremmel, M. Volonteri, and M. Bonetti, “Massive Black Hole Merger Rates: The Effect of Kiloparsec Separation Wandering and Supernova Feedback,” Astrophys. J. 904 (2020), no. 1, 16, 2006.03065

    2020 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Massive black hole binaries in LISA: Multimessenger prospects and electromagnetic counterparts,

    A. Mangiagli, C. Caprini, M. Volonteri, S. Marsat, S. Vergani, N. Tamanini, and H. Inchausp´ e, “Massive black hole binaries in LISA: Multimessenger prospects and electromagnetic counterparts,” Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022), no. 10, 103017, 2207.10678

    2022 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Intermediate Mass Ratio Inspirals in Milky Way Galaxies,

    J. Bellovary, Y. Luo, T. Quinn, F. Munshi, M. Tremmel, and J. Wadsley, “Intermediate Mass Ratio Inspirals in Milky Way Galaxies,” 2411.12117

    arXiv

  8. [15]

    Detectability of Intermediate-Mass Black Holes in Multiband Gravitational Wave Astronomy,

    K. Jani, D. Shoemaker, and C. Cutler, “Detectability of Intermediate-Mass Black Holes in Multiband Gravitational Wave Astronomy,” Nature Astron. 4 (2019), no. 3, 260–265, 1908.04985. – 70 –

    2019 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Waveform Modelling for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,

    LISA Consortium W aveform W orking GroupCollaboration, N. Afshordi et al. , “Waveform Modelling for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,” 2311.01300

    arXiv

  10. [17]

    Gravitational Self Force in a Schwarzschild Background and the Effective One Body Formalism,

    T. Damour, “Gravitational Self Force in a Schwarzschild Background and the Effective One Body Formalism,” Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 024017, 0910.5533

    2010 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Toward a gravitational self-force-informed effective-one-body waveform model for nonprecessing, eccentric, large-mass-ratio inspirals,

    A. Nagar and S. Albanesi, “Toward a gravitational self-force-informed effective-one-body waveform model for nonprecessing, eccentric, large-mass-ratio inspirals,” Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022), no. 6, 064049, 2207.14002

    2022 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Enhancing the SEOBNRv5 effective-one-body waveform model with second-order gravitational self-force fluxes,

    M. van de Meent, A. Buonanno, D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, L. Pompili, N. Warburton, A. Pound, B. Wardell, L. Durkan, and J. Miller, “Enhancing the SEOBNRv5 effective-one-body waveform model with second-order gravitational self-force fluxes,” Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 12, 1...

    2023 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms with gravitational self-force results within the effective-one-body formalism,

    B. Leather, A. Buonanno, and M. van de Meent, “Inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms with gravitational self-force results within the effective-one-body formalism,” 2505.11242

  14. [21]

    Gravitational Waveforms for Compact Binaries from Second-Order Self-Force Theory,

    B. Wardell, A. Pound, N. Warburton, J. Miller, L. Durkan, and A. Le Tiec, “Gravitational Waveforms for Compact Binaries from Second-Order Self-Force Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023), no. 24, 241402, 2112.12265

    2023 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Comparing second-order gravitational self-force, numerical relativity, and effective one body waveforms from inspiralling, quasicircular, and nonspinning black hole binaries,

    A. Albertini, A. Nagar, A. Pound, N. Warburton, B. Wardell, L. Durkan, and J. Miller, “Comparing second-order gravitational self-force, numerical relativity, and effective one body waveforms from inspiralling, quasicircular, and nonspinning black hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. D 1...

    2022 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Fast extreme-mass-ratio-inspiral waveforms: New tools for millihertz gravitational-wave data analysis,

    M. L. Katz, A. J. K. Chua, L. Speri, N. Warburton, and S. A. Hughes, “Fast extreme-mass-ratio-inspiral waveforms: New tools for millihertz gravitational-wave data analysis,” Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 6, 064047, 2104.04582

    2021 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Relativistic dynamics and extreme mass ratio inspirals,

    P. Amaro-Seoane, “Relativistic dynamics and extreme mass ratio inspirals,” Living Rev. Rel. 21 (2018), no. 1, 4, 1205.5240

    2018 arXiv

  18. [25]

    The Science of the Einstein Telescope,

    A. Abac et al. , “The Science of the Einstein Telescope,” 2503.12263

    arXiv

  19. [26]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves,

    L. Blanchet, “Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves,” Living Rev. Rel. 17 (2014) 2, 1310.1528

    2014 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity,

    L. Barack and A. Pound, “Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 82 (2019), no. 1, 016904, 1805.10385

    2019 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Black Hole Perturbation Theory and Gravitational Self-Force,

    A. Pound and B. Wardell, “Black Hole Perturbation Theory and Gravitational Self-Force,” in Handbook of Gravitational Wave Astronomy , p. 38. 2022. 2101.04592

    2022 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Numerical Relativity of Compact Binaries in the 21st Century,

    M. D. Duez and Y. Zlochower, “Numerical Relativity of Compact Binaries in the 21st Century,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 82 (2019), no. 1, 016902, 1808.06011

    2019 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Modeling ringdown: Beyond the fundamental quasinormal modes,

    L. London, D. Shoemaker, and J. Healy, “Modeling ringdown: Beyond the fundamental quasinormal modes,” Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014), no. 12, 124032, 1404.3197. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 94, 069902 (2016)]

    2014 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment,

    E. Berti et al. , “Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment,” 2505.23895

    arXiv

  25. [32]

    Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics,

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, “Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 084006, gr-qc/9811091

    1999 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Transition from inspiral to plunge in binary black hole coalescences,

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, “Transition from inspiral to plunge in binary black hole coalescences,” Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 064015, gr-qc/0001013. – 71 –

    2000 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Gravitational waves from black hole binary inspiral and merger: The Span of third postNewtonian effective one-body templates,

    T. Damour, B. R. Iyer, P. Jaranowski, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Gravitational waves from black hole binary inspiral and merger: The Span of third postNewtonian effective one-body templates,” Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 064028, gr-qc/0211041

    2003 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Faithful effective-one-body waveforms of small-mass-ratio coalescing black-hole binaries,

    T. Damour and A. Nagar, “Faithful effective-one-body waveforms of small-mass-ratio coalescing black-hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. D76 (2007) 064028, 0705.2519

    2007 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Effective-one-body waveforms calibrated to numerical relativity simulations: Coalescence of non-spinning, equal-mass black holes,

    A. Buonanno, Y. Pan, H. P. Pfeiffer, M. A. Scheel, L. T. Buchman, and L. E. Kidder, “Effective-one-body waveforms calibrated to numerical relativity simulations: Coalescence of non-spinning, equal-mass black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 124028, 0902.0790

    2009 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Small mass plunging into a Kerr black hole: Anatomy of the inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms,

    A. Taracchini, A. Buonanno, G. Khanna, and S. A. Hughes, “Small mass plunging into a Kerr black hole: Anatomy of the inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms,” Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014), no. 8, 084025, 1404.1819

    2014 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Assessment of consistent next-to-quasicircular corrections and postadiabatic approximation in effective-one-body multipolar waveforms for binary black hole coalescences,

    G. Riemenschneider, P. Rettegno, M. Breschi, A. Albertini, R. Gamba, S. Bernuzzi, and A. Nagar, “Assessment of consistent next-to-quasicircular corrections and postadiabatic approximation in effective-one-body multipolar waveforms for binary black hole coalescences,” Phys. Rev...

    2021 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Phenomenological template family for black-hole coalescence waveforms,

    P. Ajith et al. , “Phenomenological template family for black-hole coalescence waveforms,” Class. Quant. Grav. 24 (2007) S689–S700, 0704.3764

    2007 arXiv

  33. [40]

    A Template bank for gravitational waveforms from coalescing binary black holes. I. Non-spinning binaries,

    P. Ajith et al. , “A Template bank for gravitational waveforms from coalescing binary black holes. I. Non-spinning binaries,” Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 104017, 0710.2335. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 79, 129901 (2009)]

    2008 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms for black-hole binaries with non-precessing spins,

    P. Ajith et al. , “Inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms for black-hole binaries with non-precessing spins,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 241101, 0909.2867

    2011 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Matching post-Newtonian and numerical relativity waveforms: systematic errors and a new phenomenological model for non-precessing black hole binaries,

    L. Santamaria et al. , “Matching post-Newtonian and numerical relativity waveforms: systematic errors and a new phenomenological model for non-precessing black hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 064016, 1005.3306

    2010 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Two-timescale evolution of extreme-mass-ratio inspirals: waveform generation scheme for quasicircular orbits in Schwarzschild spacetime,

    J. Miller and A. Pound, “Two-timescale evolution of extreme-mass-ratio inspirals: waveform generation scheme for quasicircular orbits in Schwarzschild spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 6, 064048, 2006.11263

    2021 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Post-adiabatic waveform-generation framework for asymmetric precessing binaries,

    J. Mathews and A. Pound, “Post-adiabatic waveform-generation framework for asymmetric precessing binaries,” 2501.01413

  38. [45]

    Two timescale analysis of extreme mass ratio inspirals in Kerr. I. Orbital Motion,

    T. Hinderer and E. E. Flanagan, “Two timescale analysis of extreme mass ratio inspirals in Kerr. I. Orbital Motion,” Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 064028, 0805.3337

    2008 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Location of the last stable orbit in Kerr spacetime,

    L. C. Stein and N. Warburton, “Location of the last stable orbit in Kerr spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 6, 064007, 1912.07609

    2020 arXiv

  40. [47]

    The Transition from inspiral to plunge for a compact body in a circular equatorial orbit around a massive, spinning black hole,

    A. Ori and K. S. Thorne, “The Transition from inspiral to plunge for a compact body in a circular equatorial orbit around a massive, spinning black hole,” Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 124022, gr-qc/0003032

    2000 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Self-consistent adiabatic inspiral and transition motion,

    G. Comp` ere and L. K¨ uchler, “Self-consistent adiabatic inspiral and transition motion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021), no. 24, 241106, 2102.12747

    2021 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Erratum: Self-consistent adiabatic inspiral and transition motion [phys. rev. lett. 126, 241106 (2021)],

    G. Comp` ere and L. K¨ uchler, “Erratum: Self-consistent adiabatic inspiral and transition motion [phys. rev. lett. 126, 241106 (2021)],” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (Jan, 2022) 029901. – 72 –

    2021

  43. [50]

    Asymptotically matched quasi-circular inspiral and transition-to-plunge in the small mass ratio expansion,

    G. Comp` ere and L. K¨ uchler, “Asymptotically matched quasi-circular inspiral and transition-to-plunge in the small mass ratio expansion,” SciPost Phys. 13 (2022), no. 2, 043, 2112.02114

    2022 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Self-force framework for transition-to-plunge waveforms,

    L. K¨ uchler, G. Comp` ere, L. Durkan, and A. Pound, “Self-force framework for transition-to-plunge waveforms,” SciPost Phys. 17 (2024) 056, 2405.00170

    2024 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Towards adiabatic waveforms for inspiral into Kerr black holes. I. A New model of the source for the time domain perturbation equation,

    P. A. Sundararajan, G. Khanna, and S. A. Hughes, “Towards adiabatic waveforms for inspiral into Kerr black holes. I. A New model of the source for the time domain perturbation equation,” Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 104005, gr-qc/0703028

    2007 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Towards adiabatic waveforms for inspiral into Kerr black holes: II. Dynamical sources and generic orbits,

    P. A. Sundararajan, G. Khanna, S. A. Hughes, and S. Drasco, “Towards adiabatic waveforms for inspiral into Kerr black holes: II. Dynamical sources and generic orbits,” Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 024022, 0803.0317

    2008 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Binary black hole merger gravitational waves and recoil in the large mass ratio limit,

    P. A. Sundararajan, G. Khanna, and S. A. Hughes, “Binary black hole merger gravitational waves and recoil in the large mass ratio limit,” Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 104009, 1003.0485

    2010 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Surrogate model for gravitational wave signals from comparable and large-mass-ratio black hole binaries,

    N. E. M. Rifat, S. E. Field, G. Khanna, and V. Varma, “Surrogate model for gravitational wave signals from comparable and large-mass-ratio black hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 8, 081502, 1910.10473

    2020 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Islam, S

    T. Islam, S. E. Field, S. A. Hughes, G. Khanna, V. Varma, M. Giesler, M. A. Scheel, L. E. Kidder, and H. P. Pfeiffer, “Surrogate model for gravitational wave signals from nonspinning, comparable-to large-mass-ratio black hole binaries built on black hole perturbation theory wa...

    2022 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Post-ISCO Ringdown Amplitudes in Extreme Mass Ratio Inspiral,

    S. Hadar and B. Kol, “Post-ISCO Ringdown Amplitudes in Extreme Mass Ratio Inspiral,” Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 044019, 0911.3899

    2011 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Multipolar gravitational waveforms and ringdowns generated during the plunge from the innermost stable circular orbit into a Schwarzschild black hole,

    A. Folacci and M. Ould El Hadj, “Multipolar gravitational waveforms and ringdowns generated during the plunge from the innermost stable circular orbit into a Schwarzschild black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018), no. 8, 084008, 1806.01577

    2018 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Extracting linear and nonlinear quasinormal modes from black hole merger simulations,

    M. H.-Y. Cheung, E. Berti, V. Baibhav, and R. Cotesta, “Extracting linear and nonlinear quasinormal modes from black hole merger simulations,” Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 4, 044069, 2310.04489. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 110, 049902 (2024)]

    2024 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Measuring quasinormal mode amplitudes with misaligned binary black hole ringdowns,

    H. Lim, S. A. Hughes, and G. Khanna, “Measuring quasinormal mode amplitudes with misaligned binary black hole ringdowns,” Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 12, 124030, 2204.06007

    2022 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Ringdown amplitudes of nonspinning eccentric binaries,

    G. Carullo, “Ringdown amplitudes of nonspinning eccentric binaries,” JCAP 10 (2024) 061, 2406.19442

    2024 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Probing the ringdown perturbation in binary black hole coalescences with an improved quasi-normal mode extraction algorithm,

    K. Mitman et al. , “Probing the ringdown perturbation in binary black hole coalescences with an improved quasi-normal mode extraction algorithm,” 2503.09678

    arXiv

  56. [63]

    Self-force framework for merger-ringdown waveforms (ancillary files)

    “Self-force framework for merger-ringdown waveforms (ancillary files).” ( https: //github.com/gcompere/Self-force-framework-for-merger-ringdown-waveforms )

  57. [64]

    Second-order gravitational self-force,

    A. Pound, “Second-order gravitational self-force,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 051101, 1201.5089

    2012 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Nonlinear gravitational self-force. I. Field outside a small body,

    A. Pound, “Nonlinear gravitational self-force. I. Field outside a small body,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 084019, 1206.6538. – 73 –

    2012 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Nonlinear gravitational self-force: second-order equation of motion,

    A. Pound, “Nonlinear gravitational self-force: second-order equation of motion,” Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017), no. 10, 104056, 1703.02836

    2017 arXiv

  60. [67]

    Second-order gravitational self-force in a highly regular gauge,

    S. D. Upton and A. Pound, “Second-order gravitational self-force in a highly regular gauge,” Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 12, 124016, 2101.11409

    2021 arXiv

  61. [68]

    Gravitational radiation reaction and second order perturbation theory,

    S. Detweiler, “Gravitational radiation reaction and second order perturbation theory,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 044048, 1107.2098

    2012 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Practical, covariant puncture for second-order self-force calculations,

    A. Pound and J. Miller, “Practical, covariant puncture for second-order self-force calculations,” Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014), no. 10, 104020, 1403.1843

    2014 arXiv

  63. [70]

    Post-adiabatic dynamics and waveform generation in gravitational self-force theory: a pseudo-hamiltonian framework

    J. Lewis, T. Kakehi, A. Pound, and T. Tanaka, “Post-adiabatic dynamics and waveform generation in gravitational self-force theory: a pseudo-hamiltonian framework.” in preparation

  64. [71]

    Worldtube puncture scheme for first- and second-order self-force calculations in the Fourier domain,

    J. Miller, B. Leather, A. Pound, and N. Warburton, “Worldtube puncture scheme for first- and second-order self-force calculations in the Fourier domain,” Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 10, 104010, 2401.00455

    2024 arXiv

  65. [72]

    Second-order perturbation theory: problems on large scales,

    A. Pound, “Second-order perturbation theory: problems on large scales,” Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015), no. 10, 104047, 1510.05172

    2015 arXiv

  66. [73]

    Gravitational memory: new results from post-Newtonian and self-force theory,

    K. Cunningham, C. Kavanagh, A. Pound, D. Trestini, N. Warburton, and J. Neef, “Gravitational memory: new results from post-Newtonian and self-force theory,” 2410.23950

  67. [74]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation. W.H.Freeman & Co Ltd, 1973

    1973

  68. [75]

    PhD thesis, U

    K¨ uchler, Lorenzo,Inspiral, transition and plunge: a framework for complete waveforms in the small-mass-ratio expansion . PhD thesis, U. Brussels, 2023

    2023

  69. [76]

    A Rigorous Derivation of Gravitational Self-force,

    S. E. Gralla and R. M. Wald, “A Rigorous Derivation of Gravitational Self-force,” Class. Quant. Grav. 25 (2008) 205009, 0806.3293. [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 28, 159501 (2011)]

    2008 arXiv

  70. [77]

    Gauge and motion in perturbation theory,

    A. Pound, “Gauge and motion in perturbation theory,” Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015), no. 4, 044021, 1506.02894

    2015 arXiv

  71. [78]

    Isofrequency pairing of geodesic orbits in Kerr geometry,

    N. Warburton, L. Barack, and N. Sago, “Isofrequency pairing of geodesic orbits in Kerr geometry,” Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013), no. 8, 084012, 1301.3918

    2013 arXiv

  72. [79]

    Electromagnetic radiation generated by a charged particle plunging into a Schwarzschild black hole: Multipolar waveforms and ringdowns,

    A. Folacci and M. Ould El Hadj, “Electromagnetic radiation generated by a charged particle plunging into a Schwarzschild black hole: Multipolar waveforms and ringdowns,” Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018), no. 2, 024021, 1805.11950

    2018 arXiv

  73. [80]

    Extreme mass-ratio binary black hole merger: Characteristics of the test-particle limit,

    B. Rom and R. Sari, “Extreme mass-ratio binary black hole merger: Characteristics of the test-particle limit,” Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022), no. 10, 104040, 2204.11738

    2022 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Chandrasekhar, The mathematical theory of black holes

    S. Chandrasekhar, The mathematical theory of black holes . The International Series of Monographs on Physics. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1983

    1983

  75. [83]

    Gravitational perturbations of the Schwarzschild spacetime: A Practical covariant and gauge-invariant formalism,

    K. Martel and E. Poisson, “Gravitational perturbations of the Schwarzschild spacetime: A Practical covariant and gauge-invariant formalism,” Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 104003, gr-qc/0502028. – 74 –

    2005 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Second-order perturbations of the Schwarzschild spacetime: Practical, covariant, and gauge-invariant formalisms,

    A. Spiers, A. Pound, and B. Wardell, “Second-order perturbations of the Schwarzschild spacetime: Practical, covariant, and gauge-invariant formalisms,” Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 6, 064030, 2306.17847

    2024 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Stability of a schwarzschild singularity,

    T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler, “Stability of a schwarzschild singularity,” Phys. Rev. 108 (Nov, 1957) 1063–1069

    1957

  78. [86]

    Gravitational field of a particle falling in a schwarzschild geometry analyzed in tensor harmonics,

    F. J. Zerilli, “Gravitational field of a particle falling in a schwarzschild geometry analyzed in tensor harmonics,” Phys. Rev. D 2 (Nov, 1970) 2141–2160

    1970

  79. [87]

    Gravitational perturbations and metric reconstruction: Method of extended homogeneous solutions applied to eccentric orbits on a Schwarzschild black hole,

    S. Hopper and C. R. Evans, “Gravitational perturbations and metric reconstruction: Method of extended homogeneous solutions applied to eccentric orbits on a Schwarzschild black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 084010, 1006.4907

    2010 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Radiation from collapsing relativistic stars. I - Linearized odd-parity radiation,

    C. T. Cunningham, R. H. Price, and V. Moncrief, “Radiation from collapsing relativistic stars. I - Linearized odd-parity radiation,” Astrophys. J. 224 (1978) 643

    1978

  81. [89]

    Gravitational perturbations of spherically symmetric systems. I. The exterior problem.,

    V. Moncrief, “Gravitational perturbations of spherically symmetric systems. I. The exterior problem.,” Annals Phys. 88 (1974) 323–342

    1974

  82. [90]

    Radiation from collapsing relativistic stars. II. Linearized even-parity radiation,

    C. T. Cunningham, R. H. Price, and V. Moncrief, “Radiation from collapsing relativistic stars. II. Linearized even-parity radiation,” Astrophys. J. 230 (1979) 870–892

    1979

  83. [91]

    The Quasi-Normal Modes of the Schwarzschild Black Hole,

    S. Chandrasekhar and S. Detweiler, “The Quasi-Normal Modes of the Schwarzschild Black Hole,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A 344 (Aug., 1975) 441–452

    1975

  84. [92]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes,

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, “Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes,” Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 163001, 0905.2975

    2009 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Quasinormal ringing of Kerr black holes. I. The Excitation factors,

    E. Berti and V. Cardoso, “Quasinormal ringing of Kerr black holes. I. The Excitation factors,” Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 104020, gr-qc/0605118

    2006 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Quasinormal ringing of Kerr black holes. II. Excitation by particles falling radially with arbitrary energy,

    Z. Zhang, E. Berti, and V. Cardoso, “Quasinormal ringing of Kerr black holes. II. Excitation by particles falling radially with arbitrary energy,” Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 044018, 1305.4306

    2013 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Ease of excitation of black hole ringing: Quantifying the importance of overtones by the excitation factors,

    N. Oshita, “Ease of excitation of black hole ringing: Quantifying the importance of overtones by the excitation factors,” Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 12, 124032, 2109.09757

    2021 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Spectral decomposition of the perturbation response of the Schwarzschild geometry,

    E. W. Leaver, “Spectral decomposition of the perturbation response of the Schwarzschild geometry,” Phys. Rev. D 34 (1986) 384–408

    1986

  89. [97]

    Black Hole Perturbation Toolkit

    “Black Hole Perturbation Toolkit.” (bhptoolkit.org)

  90. [98]

    Self-force with (3+1) codes: A Primer for numerical relativists,

    I. Vega, P. Diener, W. Tichy, and S. L. Detweiler, “Self-force with (3+1) codes: A Primer for numerical relativists,” Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 084021, 0908.2138

    2009 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Ringdown

    E. Berti, “Ringdown.” https://pages.jh.edu/eberti2/ringdown/

  92. [100]

    On gravitational-wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA,

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and C. M. Will, “On gravitational-wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA,” Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 064030, gr-qc/0512160

    2006 arXiv

  93. [101]

    An Analytic representation for the quasi normal modes of Kerr black holes,

    E. W. Leaver, “An Analytic representation for the quasi normal modes of Kerr black holes,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 402 (1985) 285–298

    1985

  94. [102]

    SXS Gravitational Waveform Database

    “SXS Gravitational Waveform Database.” https://data.black-holes.org/waveforms/index.html

  95. [103]

    The SXS Collaboration catalog of binary black hole simulations,

    M. Boyle et al. , “The SXS Collaboration catalog of binary black hole simulations,” Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019), no. 19, 195006, 1904.04831. – 75 –

    2019 arXiv

  96. [104]

    The sxs package

    M. Boyle and M. Scheel, “The sxs package.” 10.5281/zenodo.4034006

    doi

  97. [105]

    Periastron Advance in Black Hole Binaries,

    A. Le Tiec, A. H. Mroue, L. Barack, A. Buonanno, H. P. Pfeiffer, N. Sago, and A. Taracchini, “Periastron Advance in Black Hole Binaries,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 141101, 1106.3278

    2011 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Gravitational Self-Force Correction to the Binding Energy of Compact Binary Systems,

    A. Le Tiec, E. Barausse, and A. Buonanno, “Gravitational Self-Force Correction to the Binding Energy of Compact Binary Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 131103, 1111.5609

    2012 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Periastron Advance in Spinning Black Hole Binaries: Gravitational Self-Force from Numerical Relativity,

    A. Le Tiec et al. , “Periastron Advance in Spinning Black Hole Binaries: Gravitational Self-Force from Numerical Relativity,” Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013), no. 12, 124027, 1309.0541

    2013 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Gravitational recoil in nonspinning black hole binaries: the span of test-mass results,

    A. Nagar, “Gravitational recoil in nonspinning black hole binaries: the span of test-mass results,” Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013), no. 12, 121501, 1306.6299

    2013 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Horizon Surface Gravity in Corotating Black Hole Binaries,

    A. Le Tiec and P. Grandcl´ ement, “Horizon Surface Gravity in Corotating Black Hole Binaries,” Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018), no. 14, 144002, 1710.03673

    2018 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Intermediate mass-ratio black hole binaries: Applicability of small mass-ratio perturbation theory,

    M. van de Meent and H. P. Pfeiffer, “Intermediate mass-ratio black hole binaries: Applicability of small mass-ratio perturbation theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020), no. 18, 181101, 2006.12036

    2020 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Binary black-hole simulation SXS:BBH:1220,

    J. Blackman and S. Collaboration, “Binary black-hole simulation SXS:BBH:1220,” Aug., 2024

    2024

  104. [112]

    Binary black-hole simulation SXS:BBH:2477,

    S. Collaboration, “Binary black-hole simulation SXS:BBH:2477,” Aug., 2024

    2024

  105. [113]

    Binary black-hole simulation SXS:BBH:1931,

    S. Collaboration, “Binary black-hole simulation SXS:BBH:1931,” July, 2019

    1931

  106. [114]

    Binary black-hole simulation SXS:BBH:2471,

    S. Collaboration, “Binary black-hole simulation SXS:BBH:2471,” Aug., 2024

    2024

  107. [115]

    Black Hole Ringdown: The Importance of Overtones,

    M. Giesler, M. Isi, M. A. Scheel, and S. Teukolsky, “Black Hole Ringdown: The Importance of Overtones,” Phys. Rev. X 9 (2019), no. 4, 041060, 1903.08284

    2019 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Ringdown overtones, black hole spectroscopy, and no-hair theorem tests,

    S. Bhagwat, X. J. Forteza, P. Pani, and V. Ferrari, “Ringdown overtones, black hole spectroscopy, and no-hair theorem tests,” Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 4, 044033, 1910.08708

    2020 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Revisiting non-linearity in binary black hole mergers,

    M. Okounkova, “Revisiting non-linearity in binary black hole mergers,” 2004.00671

    2004 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Aspects of multimode Kerr ringdown fitting,

    G. B. Cook, “Aspects of multimode Kerr ringdown fitting,” Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), no. 2, 024027, 2004.08347

    2020 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Importance of mirror modes in binary black hole ringdown waveform,

    A. Dhani, “Importance of mirror modes in binary black hole ringdown waveform,” Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 10, 104048, 2010.08602

    2021 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Quasinormal modes and their overtones at the common horizon in a binary black hole merger,

    P. Mourier, X. Jim´ enez Forteza, D. Pook-Kolb, B. Krishnan, and E. Schnetter, “Quasinormal modes and their overtones at the common horizon in a binary black hole merger,” Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 4, 044054, 2010.15186

    2021 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Modeling the ringdown from precessing black hole binaries,

    E. Finch and C. J. Moore, “Modeling the ringdown from precessing black hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 8, 084048, 2102.07794

    2021 arXiv

  114. [122]

    High-overtone fits to numerical relativity ringdowns: Beyond the dismissed n=8 special tone,

    X. J. Forteza and P. Mourier, “High-overtone fits to numerical relativity ringdowns: Beyond the dismissed n=8 special tone,” Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 12, 124072, 2107.11829

    2021 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Agnostic black hole spectroscopy: Quasinormal mode content of numerical – 76 – relativity waveforms and limits of validity of linear perturbation theory,

    V. Baibhav, M. H.-Y. Cheung, E. Berti, V. Cardoso, G. Carullo, R. Cotesta, W. Del Pozzo, and F. Duque, “Agnostic black hole spectroscopy: Quasinormal mode content of numerical – 76 – relativity waveforms and limits of validity of linear perturbation theory,” Phys. Rev. D 108 (...

    2023 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Role of black hole quasinormal mode overtones for ringdown analysis,

    P. J. Nee, S. H. V¨ olkel, and H. P. Pfeiffer, “Role of black hole quasinormal mode overtones for ringdown analysis,” Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 4, 044032, 2302.06634

    2023 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Challenges in quasinormal mode extraction: Perspectives from numerical solutions to the Teukolsky equation,

    H. Zhu, J. L. Ripley, A. C´ ardenas-Avenda˜ no, and F. Pretorius, “Challenges in quasinormal mode extraction: Perspectives from numerical solutions to the Teukolsky equation,” Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 4, 044010, 2309.13204

    2024 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Linear versus nonlinear modeling of black hole ringdowns,

    Y. Qiu, X. J. Forteza, and P. Mourier, “Linear versus nonlinear modeling of black hole ringdowns,” Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 6, 064075, 2312.15904

    2024 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Overtones and Nonlinearities in Binary Black Hole Ringdowns,

    M. Giesler et al. , “Overtones and Nonlinearities in Binary Black Hole Ringdowns,” 2411.11269

    arXiv

  120. [128]

    Inspiral, merger and ring-down of equal-mass black-hole binaries,

    A. Buonanno, G. B. Cook, and F. Pretorius, “Inspiral, merger and ring-down of equal-mass black-hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 124018, gr-qc/0610122

    2007 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Reconstruction of ringdown with excitation factors,

    N. Oshita and V. Cardoso, “Reconstruction of ringdown with excitation factors,” Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025), no. 10, 104043, 2407.02563

    2025 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Inspiral-inherited ringdown tails,

    M. De Amicis, S. Albanesi, and G. Carullo, “Inspiral-inherited ringdown tails,” Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 10, 104005, 2406.17018

    2024 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Progress towards merger-ringdown waveforms from self-force theory

    L. K¨ uchler, “Progress towards merger-ringdown waveforms from self-force theory.” Talk given at 27th Capra Meeting on Radiation Reaction in General Relativity (National University of Singapore), https://www.caprameeting.org/capra-meetings/capra-27/abstracts, 2024

    2024

  124. [132]

    Self-force framework for transition-to-plunge waveforms

    L. K¨ uchler, “Self-force framework for transition-to-plunge waveforms.” Talk given at 15th International LISA Symposium (University College Dublin), https://www.lisasymposium2024.ie/programme/, 2024

    2024

  125. [133]

    Self-force framework for transition-to-plunge waveforms

    L. K¨ uchler, “Self-force framework for transition-to-plunge waveforms.” Talk given at Fundamental Physics Meets Waveforms with LISA Workshop (Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics, Potsdam), https://workshops.aei.mpg.de/fpmeetswavelisa/program/, 2024

    2024

  126. [134]

    Inspirals from the Innermost Stable Circular Orbit of Kerr Black Holes: Exact Solutions and Universal Radial Flow,

    A. Mummery and S. Balbus, “Inspirals from the Innermost Stable Circular Orbit of Kerr Black Holes: Exact Solutions and Universal Radial Flow,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022), no. 16, 161101, 2209.03579

    2022 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Kerr-fully diving into the abyss: analytic solutions to plunging geodesics in Kerr,

    C. Dyson and M. van de Meent, “Kerr-fully diving into the abyss: analytic solutions to plunging geodesics in Kerr,” Class. Quant. Grav. 40 (2023), no. 19, 195026, 2302.03704

    2023 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Rotating black holes - separable wave equations for gravitational and electromagnetic perturbations,

    S. A. Teukolsky, “Rotating black holes - separable wave equations for gravitational and electromagnetic perturbations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 29 (1972) 1114–1118

    1972

  129. [137]

    Measuring scalar charge with compact binaries: High accuracy modeling with self-force,

    A. Spiers, A. Maselli, and T. P. Sotiriou, “Measuring scalar charge with compact binaries: High accuracy modeling with self-force,” Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 6, 064022, 2310.02315

    2024 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Probing fundamental physics with Extreme Mass Ratio Inspirals: a full Bayesian inference for scalar charge,

    L. Speri, S. Barsanti, A. Maselli, T. P. Sotiriou, N. Warburton, M. van de Meent, A. J. K. Chua, O. Burke, and J. Gair, “Probing fundamental physics with Extreme Mass Ratio Inspirals: a full Bayesian inference for scalar charge,” 2406.07607. – 77 –

  131. [139]

    Environmental effects in extreme mass ratio inspirals: perturbations to the environment in Kerr,

    C. Dyson, T. F. M. Spieksma, R. Brito, M. van de Meent, and S. Dolan, “Environmental effects in extreme mass ratio inspirals: perturbations to the environment in Kerr,” 2501.09806

    arXiv

  132. [140]

    Black hole mergers beyond general relativity: the self-force approach

    A. Roy, L. K¨ uchler, A. Pound, and R. P. Macedo, “Black hole mergers beyond general relativity: the self-force approach.” in preparation

  133. [141]

    Plunging in black hole surrounded by a dark matter halo

    G. Comp` ere, S. Chakraborty, and L. Machet, “Plunging in black hole surrounded by a dark matter halo.” in preparation. – 78 –

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.