Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Self-interactions give isocurvature a blue tilt, no mass tuning

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 10:06 UTC pith:RFK36SQY

load-bearing objection A clean boundary-stalling mechanism for blue isocurvature, honestly derived and well scoped, but the 'generic' claim depends on assumed initial conditions and a short inflation; worth a serious referee. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2510.11803 v2 pith:RFK36SQY submitted 2025-10-13 hep-ph astro-ph.COgr-qchep-th

Dynamically generated tilt of isocurvature fluctuations

Saarik Kalia This is my paper
classification hep-ph astro-ph.COgr-qchep-th PACS 98.80.Cq95.35.+d
keywords isocurvature spectrumblue tiltspectator scalardark matterquartic self-interactionsslow-roll parameterrelic abundanceinflation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that a spectator scalar field with a self-interaction potential generically produces a blue-tilted isocurvature power spectrum during inflation, eliminating the usual need for the fine-tuned coincidence m ~ H_I. The mechanism is dynamic: if the condensate starts in the fast-roll regime and rolls toward a slow-roll valley, the slow-roll parameter α decays only as 1/N, so the field's effective mass lingers near the inflationary Hubble scale for most of inflation. This lingering imprints a tilt d log P/d log k = 2α(N*) on the fluctuations, enhancing small-scale structure while evading CMB constraints. If the scalar is long-lived, its late-time relic abundance is an attractor independent of initial conditions, and for a quartic potential the correct dark-matter abundance fixes a one-parameter mass–coupling relation.

Core claim

The paper shows that self-interactions generically make the isocurvature spectrum of a spectator scalar blue-tilted. For a free scalar, a blue tilt requires m ~ H_I by coincidence; but if V has a slow-roll region (V'' < 3H_I²) and the condensate begins in the fast-roll region (V'' > 3H_I²) rolling toward it, then after a brief fast-roll phase α ≡ V''/(3H_I²) decays as 1/(κ(N − N_i)) rather than staying tiny. Since the tilt is d log Pδ/d log k = 2α(N*), the field sits near the α ~ 1 boundary during most of inflation, giving a blue tilt ~ 2/(κ(N_tot − 60)) at CMB scales. If the scalar is long-lived, the late-time abundance is an attractor independent of initial conditions, and for a quartic po

What carries the argument

The central object is the dimensionless slow-roll parameter α(N) ≡ V''(φ0)/(3H_I²), which acts as the effective mass squared of the perturbations in units of H_I². Its evolution equation dα/dN = −κ α², with κ ≡ V'''V'/V''², yields the 1/N decay after fast-roll, giving the lingering near α ~ 1. The tilt formula d log Pδ/d log k = 2α(N*) converts that lingering into a blue spectrum. A separate-universes argument maps the late-time density contrast δ = (3/8)δ_rh − (3/2)Φ, preserving the tilt to observable scales.

Load-bearing premise

The field must begin inflation in the fast-roll regime (V''(φ0,i) > 3H_I²) and inflation must not last much longer than the ~60 e-folds before CMB modes exit; if either fails, the lingering near α~1 and hence the blue tilt do not occur.

What would settle it

Measure the isocurvature tilt at two separated scales: the mechanism predicts dlog P/dlog k = 2α(N*) with α(N*) ≈ 1/(κ(N_tot − N*)), so the tilt should grow as the horizon-crossing e-fold approaches N_tot; a spectrum that is flat, or whose tilt does not track the inverse total e-fold count, would falsify the mechanism.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A large class of self-interacting spectator potentials generically yields a blue-tilted isocurvature spectrum with tilt O(0.1) at CMB scales when inflation begins roughly 60 e-folds before the pivot mode exits, rather than requiring m ≈ H_I by hand.
  • The same spectrum is suppressed on the largest scales, evading CMB limits, and enhanced on small scales, where it can source gravitational waves, non-Gaussianities, and dark-matter substructure.
  • For a long-lived spectator, the late-time energy density is an attractor solution, so the relic abundance is insensitive to the initial field value; for quartic dark matter this yields a predictive m–λ relation with viable all-dark-matter parameter space.
  • The tilt is erased if inflation lasts much longer than the ~60 e-folds before CMB horizon exit, since α(N*) ∝ 1/(N_tot − N*); thus the mechanism implies a bound on the total duration of inflation for it to be observable.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same α(N) ∝ 1/N form predicts a specific relationship between the tilt and the total e-folds; measuring the isocurvature tilt at two or more scales (e.g., CMB and Lyman-α or dwarf-galaxy scales) would directly test this functional form.
  • The condition V'''V' > 0 that selects monomial-like potentials naturally excludes cosine-like (axionic) potentials; classifying spectator potentials by the sign and size of κ could map the full space of blue-tilted spectators.
  • The requirement that inflation not last much longer than ~60 e-folds after the spectator begins rolling connects this mechanism to specific inflaton models with relatively short duration; combining with a concrete model would sharpen the predicted tilt.
  • If the spectator has any weak coupling to Standard Model fields, the enhanced small-scale isocurvature could seed ultracompact minihalos or peculiar 21-cm signatures, providing an observational window beyond the scales shown in the paper's parameter plot.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a spectator scalar field with a nontrivial potential during inflation. Its central claim is that if the condensate begins in a fast-roll regime and rolls toward a slow-roll valley, the dimensionless curvature parameter α = V''/(3H_I^2) approaches the slow-roll boundary and then decays only as 1/N, so the effective mass lingers near H_I. The isocurvature power spectrum then acquires a blue tilt 2α(N_*) that avoids CMB constraints while enhancing small-scale power. The same attractor dynamics, applied to a quartic potential with a small mass term, gives a one-parameter relation between m and λ for the field to constitute all of the dark matter, shown in Fig. 2. The analytic derivations in Sec. II and the relic-density scalings in Sec. III are internally consistent, and the paper makes its code publicly available.

Significance. If fully established, the mechanism would replace the coincidence m ~ H_I for a free scalar with a dynamical near-saturation of the slow-roll boundary, making blue-tilted isocurvature a plausible generic signature of self-interacting spectators. The paper is also valuable for proposing a predictive dark-matter production channel analogous to axion misalignment. Strengths include the explicit analytic solution for α(N), the clear statement of approximations (exact de Sitter, instantaneous reheating, separate universes), and the public code. The central limitation is that the two premises on which the genericity claim rests—initial displacement into the fast-roll basin and a total duration of inflation not much longer than |N_*|—are inputs to the model rather than consequences of the dynamics. The paper acknowledges both, but the abstract and introduction present the result as generic, which is stronger than the derived conditional statement.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II A] The mechanism requires that φ_0 begins in the fast-roll regime, V''(φ_0,i) > 3H_I^2. The attractor solution in Eqs. (10)–(12) only operates after α has fallen below unity; it does not select or explain the initial displacement. If the field starts near the minimum of its potential, α ≪ 1 throughout inflation and the spectrum is the usual flat, CMB-excluded one. Thus the abstract's statement that the dynamics 'naturally cause' the condition m_eff ~ H_I and that a blue tilt is 'generically expected' is not supported by the derivation. Please either provide an independent justification for the initial-condition prior (e.g., from stochastic inflation or a pre-inflationary phase) or explicitly reformulate the central claim as conditional on starting in the fast-roll basin.
  2. [Sec. IV] The tilt at CMB scales is 2α(N_*) ≈ 2/[κ(N_tot − 60)]. This is O(0.1) only when N_tot − 60 is O(10); for N_tot = 100 it drops to ≈ 0.02, and for a generic long slow-roll phase it is erased. The paper itself labels 'inflation does not last too long' as a 'crucial condition' in Sec. IV, but this is an unmodeled input, not a consequence of the potential or of the spectator dynamics. Without a reason why the total number of e-folds is close to 60, the genericity claim is not established. A concrete improvement would be to state an explicit upper bound or prior on N_tot in the model class considered, or to show that the observable tilt is robust to larger N_tot in some sub-class.
  3. [Sec. III A] The claim that the relic abundance is 'insensitive to initial conditions' is also conditional. The attractor erases the precise value of φ_0 only after the field has entered the slow-roll basin; the time N_sr at which α reaches 1 depends logarithmically on α_i, and the final abundance inherits this dependence through α_rh (e.g., ρ_rh ∝ α_rh^2 in Eq. (26) and ρa^3 ∝ α_rh^{3/4} in Eq. (29)). For fixed N_tot the abundance is therefore approximately—but not exactly—independent of the initial displacement, and the residual dependence is largest when N_tot is close to 60, which is precisely the regime needed for an observable tilt. The text should quantify this residual dependence or restate the attractor claim more carefully.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (16)] Typo: '∂_τ^2 f''_k' should be '∂_τ^2 f_k'.
  2. [Eq. (28)] The expression for a_m is garbled in the text; it should be typeset as a_m ∼ (α_rh/4)^{1/4} H_I/m.
  3. [Eq. (19)] The factor exp(−2∫ α dN) could be made clearer by stating that α is evaluated along the condensate trajectory and by noting that the integral is dominated by the slow-roll regime where Eq. (12) applies.
  4. [Sec. III A] The sentence 'the scalar will always begin radiation domination as it ended inflation: slow rolling' is slightly misleading when α_rh is not very small; consider adding a parenthetical that this means the kinetic energy is subdominant at reheating.
  5. [Sec. III] The paper correctly notes that the quartic-plus-mass potential is not technically natural. A brief discussion of whether this affects the viability of the dark-matter parameter space would be helpful, especially given the wide mass range in Fig. 2.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the tilt and relic-density predictions are derived from the stated dynamics; the genericity caveats are assumptions, not outputs smuggled in.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The condensate evolution uses the Klein-Gordon equation (Eq. 4); Eq. (10), dα/dN = -κα^2, is an exact rewriting of the slow-roll solution, and Eq. (12) is the solution with N_sr ≈ N_i justified by the exponential fast-roll decay of α. The perturbation spectrum follows from the mode equation (Eqs. 13-16) with Bunch-Davies initial conditions, and the tilt formula dlogP/dlogk = 2α(N*) (Eq. 22) is a direct consequence of the derived superhorizon solution, not a fitted input. The dark-matter mass-coupling relation (Sec. III and Fig. 2) is obtained by evolving the condensate and matching to the observed DM abundance, while the constraints shown come from external observations (CMB, Lyman-α, dwarfs, BBN, SIDM), not from parameters fit to the claimed prediction. The only self-citation ([32]) appears in a list of small-scale isocurvature signatures and is not load-bearing. The paper explicitly acknowledges that a 'crucial condition' is that inflation does not last too long (Sec. IV), and the mechanism requires the listed fast-roll initial conditions (end of Sec. IIA). These are genuine assumptions that limit the genericity of the conclusion, but they are inputs to the calculation rather than consequences derived from the outputs; the paper does not define any quantity in terms of the quantity it claims to predict. No circular step can be exhibited from the text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 9 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new entities are invented; the quartic scalar is a known construction. The paper's predictions hinge on five inputs (m, λ, H_I, N_tot, initial-displacement basin). The central derivations are self-contained given strict de Sitter + Bunch-Davies + instantaneous reheating + separate-universe assumptions, all stated. The two ad-hoc conditions (fast-roll displacement, short inflation) are the load-bearing premises that make the result 'generic.'

free parameters (5)
  • m (scalar mass) = 10^-4–10^6 eV scanned in Fig. 2
    Free parameter of the quartic potential; the paper predicts a one-dimensional relation λ(m), so m is an input, not derived.
  • λ (quartic self-coupling) = 10^-19–10^-7 in Fig. 2; fiducial 10^-9 in Fig. 1
    Free parameter; fixed by hand in Fig. 1 to satisfy CMB isocurvature bounds; predicted as a function of m in Fig. 2.
  • H_I (inflationary Hubble scale) = 10^10–10^12 GeV shown; treated as constant in exact dS
    Input; sets the overall normalization of perturbations and relic abundance (λ/m ∝ H_I^{3/2}).
  • N_tot (total e-folds of inflation) = N_tot = 80 fiducial
    Input; controls both the tilt (2α(N*) ≈ 2/(κ(N_tot − 60))) and the relic abundance (α_rh ≈ 1/(κN_tot)).
  • φ0,i (initial condensate value)
    Required to lie in the fast-roll basin V''(φ0,i) > 3H_I² and below M_pl (transplanckian bound in Fig. 2); the attractor erases the precise value but not the existence of the displacement.
axioms (9)
  • domain assumption Exact de Sitter spacetime with constant H_I during inflation
    Stated in Sec. II (Eq. 3); time-dependence of H introduces subleading tilt corrections (footnote 3).
  • domain assumption Bunch-Davies vacuum initial conditions for perturbations
    Eq. (15); standard for de Sitter spectator calculations.
  • domain assumption Spectator subdominance: V(φ0,i) ≪ 3H_I² M_pl² with no metric backreaction
    Condition 4 at end of Sec. IIA; also underlies the attribution of H_I variations to adiabatic perturbations in Eq. (32).
  • standard math Monomial-potential equation of state w = (p−2)/(p+2) during the oscillating (fast-roll) phase
    Derived from the virial theorem in App. B (Eq. B-9); used for the exponential rundown of α (Eq. 8).
  • standard math Slow-roll threshold |α| ≪ 1 with α ≡ V''/(3H²)
    Sec. IIA; gives the slow-roll equation dα/dN = −κα² (Eq. 10) and solution (Eq. 11).
  • ad hoc to paper Initial displacement into the fast-roll basin, V''(φ0,i) > 3H_I², with V'''V' > 0
    Conditions 1–3 at end of Sec. IIA; the boundary-stalling mechanism is not operative otherwise, and the displacement is not derived from prior dynamics.
  • ad hoc to paper Inflation duration not much larger than ~|N*| (short-inflation requirement)
    Paper's own 'crucial condition' (Sec. IV): if N_tot ≫ 60, α(N*) ≈ 1/(κ(N_tot − 60)) → 0 and the generic blue tilt vanishes; the DM abundance also shifts, changing the λ(m) line.
  • domain assumption Instantaneous reheating with radiation-domination scale factor a = sqrt(1 + 2H_I t)
    Sec. III (Eq. 24); affects the connection between a_rh and today's scale factor and hence the relic density.
  • domain assumption Separate-universe validity with negligible gradient/oscillation effects for k below Eq. (31)
    Sec. IIIB; oscillations at frequency k/(√3 a) bound the regime; App. B derives the fluid equations.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 13582 in / 44239 out tokens · 353443 ms · 2026-08-04T10:06:24.376350+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Light scalar fields acquire isocurvature fluctuations during inflation. While these fluctuations could lead to interesting observable signatures at small scales, they are strongly constrained on large scales by cosmic microwave background observations. When the mass of the scalar is much lighter than the inflationary Hubble scale, $m\ll H_I$, the spectrum of these fluctuations is flat. Meanwhile, if $m\gg H_I$, the fluctuations are suppressed. A blue-tilted isocurvature spectrum which exhibits enhanced structure on small scales but avoids observational constraints on large scales therefore requires a coincidence of scales $m\sim H_I$ for a free massive scalar. In this work, we show that if a scalar field possesses a nontrivial potential, its inflationary dynamics naturally cause this condition to be satisfied, and so a blue-tilted spectrum is generically expected for a large class of potentials. Specifically, if its potential $V$ exhibits a region which satisfies the slow-roll condition $V''<3H_I^2$, the scalar condensate will spend most of inflation close to the boundary of this region, so that its effective mass is typically close to $H_I$. The resulting blue tilt is inversely proportional to the number of $e$-folds of inflation prior to horizon crossing. If the scalar is long-lived, this mechanism leads to an attractor prediction for its relic abundance, which is insensitive to initial conditions of the scalar. In particular, a scalar field with quartic self-interactions can achieve the correct abundance to constitute all of the dark matter for a wide range of masses. We compute the relationship between the mass and self-coupling of quartic dark matter predicted by this mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.11803 by Saarik Kalia.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Parameter space for inflationary production of scalar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Isocurvature Induced Gravitational Waves at Pulsar Timing Arrays

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The work shows that free-streaming dark radiation isocurvature produces a qualitatively different gravitational wave spectrum than cold dark matter isocurvature and derives constraints on isocurvature power spectra ar...

  2. CMB Constraints on Pre-Inflationary Axion Dark Matter Isocurvature

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Combined CMB datasets moderately tighten the allowed range for the spectral index of axion isocurvature but leave amplitude bounds for fixed indices unchanged.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 6 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    separate universes

    spectator [25, 46], while the second factor represents the damping due to the nonzero potential. Ultimately, we are interested in the statistics of the density perturbations4 δk ≡ δρk ρ ≈ V ′(ϕ0) V(ϕ 0) δϕk,(20) whereδρ k are the Fourier modes ofρ(x, t). From Eq. (19), we can compute the power spectrum of the density perturbations Pδ(k)|rh ≈ 1 12π2αrh V ′...

    2024

  2. [2]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise and F. Wilczek,Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 127–132

    1983

  3. [3]

    Abbott and P

    L. Abbott and P. Sikivie,A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 133–136

    1983

  4. [4]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler,The Not So Harmless Axion, Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 137–141

    1983

  5. [5]

    P. J. E. Peebles and A. Vilenkin,Noninteracting dark matter,Physical Review D60(Oct. 1999)

    1999

  6. [6]

    Arias, D

    P. Arias, D. Cadamuro, M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, J. Re- dondo and A. Ringwald,Wispy cold dark matter,Jour- nal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2012(June

  7. [7]

    Arvanitaki, J

    A. Arvanitaki, J. Huang and K. Van Tilburg,Searching for dilaton dark matter with atomic clocks,Physical Re- view D91(Jan. 2015)

    2015

  8. [8]

    Brzeminski, Z

    D. Brzeminski, Z. Chacko, A. Dev and A. Hook,Time- varying fine structure constant from naturally ultralight dark matter,Physical Review D104(Oct. 2021)

    2021

  9. [9]

    Cyncynates and O

    D. Cyncynates and O. Simon,Scalar relics from the hot big bang,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(Sep 2025) 101003

    2025

  10. [10]

    Peccei and H

    R. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,CP Conservation in the Pres- ence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.38(1977) 1440–1443

    1977

  11. [11]

    Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys

    S. Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys. Rev. Lett.40 (1978) 223–226

    1978

  12. [12]

    Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys

    F. Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 279–282

    1978

  13. [13]

    Gherghetta, C

    T. Gherghetta, C. Kolda and S. P. Martin,Flat directions in the scalar potential of the supersymmetric standard model,Nuclear Physics B468(May 1996) 37–58

    1996

  14. [14]

    S. P. Martin,A Supersymmetry primer,Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys.18(1998) 1–98 [arXiv:hep-ph/9709356]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  15. [15]

    P. W. Graham, D. E. Kaplan and S. Rajendran,Cos- mological relaxation of the electroweak scale,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 221801 [arXiv:1504.07551]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  16. [16]

    Affleck and M

    I. Affleck and M. Dine,A new mechanism for baryogen- esis,Nuclear Physics B249(1985) 361–380

    1985

  17. [17]

    A. G. Cohen and D. B. Kaplan,Spontaneous baryogene- sis,Nucl. Phys. B308(1988) 913–928

    1988

  18. [18]

    R. T. Co, L. J. Hall and K. Harigaya,Predictions for ax- ion couplings from alp cogenesis,Journal of High Energy Physics2021(Jan. 2021)

    2021

  19. [19]

    L. F. Abbott,A Mechanism for Reducing the Value of the Cosmological Constant,Phys. Lett. B150(1985) 427– 430

    1985

  20. [20]

    L. H. Ford,Cosmological-constant damping by unstable scalar fields,Phys. Rev. D35(Apr 1987) 2339–2344

    1987

  21. [21]

    Alberte, P

    L. Alberte, P. Creminelli, A. Khmelnitsky, D. Pirt- skhalava and E. Trincherini,Relaxing the cosmological constant: a proof of concept,Journal of High Energy Physics2016(Dec. 2016)

    2016

  22. [22]

    P. W. Graham, D. E. Kaplan and S. Rajendran,Re- laxation of the cosmological constant,Physical Review D 100(July 2019)

    2019

  23. [23]

    Aghanim, Y

    N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini et al.,Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters,Astronomy & Astrophysics 641(Sept. 2020) A6

    2018

  24. [24]

    A. H. Guth,Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems,Phys. Rev. D23(Jan

  25. [25]

    A. D. Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,Phys. Lett. B108(1982) 389–393

    1982

  26. [26]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1982, 10.1017/CBO9780511622632

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622632 1982

  27. [27]

    D. H. Lyth and D. Wands,Generating the curvature perturbation without an inflaton,Physics Letters B524 (Jan. 2002) 5–14

    2002

  28. [28]

    Dom` enech, S

    G. Dom` enech, S. Passaglia and S. Renaux-Petel,Gravi- tational waves from dark matter isocurvature,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2022(Mar. 2022) 023

    2022

  29. [29]

    Ebadi, S

    R. Ebadi, S. Kumar, A. McCune, H. Tai and L.-T. Wang, Gravitational waves from stochastic scalar fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 083519 [arXiv:2307.01248]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    M. A. G. Garcia and S. Verner,Gravitational waves from spectator scalar fields,arXiv:2506.12126. 8

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Linde and V

    A. Linde and V. Mukhanov,Non-gaussian isocurvature perturbations from inflation,Physical Review D56(July

  32. [32]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Nakayama, T. Sekiguchi, T. Suyama and F. Takahashi,A General Analysis of Non- Gaussianity from Isocurvature Perturbations,JCAP01 (2009) 042 [arXiv:0810.0208]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  33. [33]

    Kalia,Stamps of state on structure: Probing the state of ultralight dark matter via its density fluctuations, arXiv:2504.16990

    S. Kalia,Stamps of state on structure: Probing the state of ultralight dark matter via its density fluctuations, arXiv:2504.16990

    arXiv

  34. [34]

    Akrami, F

    Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Bac- cigalupi, M. Ballardini et al.,Planck2018 results: X. constraints on inflation,Astronomy & Astrophysics641 (Sept. 2020) A10

    2020

  35. [35]

    K. S. Jeong and F. Takahashi,Suppressing isocurvature perturbations of qcd axion dark matter,Physics Letters B 727(Dec. 2013) 448–451

    2013

  36. [36]

    M. A. G. Garcia, M. Pierre and S. Verner,Isocurvature constraints on scalar dark matter production from the in- flaton,Physical Review D107(June 2023)

    2023

  37. [37]

    M. A. Garcia, W. Ke, Y. Mambrini, K. A. Olive and S. Verner,Scalar field fluctuations and the production of dark matter,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2025(aug 2025) 039

    2025

  38. [38]

    P. W. Graham and D. Racco,Revisiting Isocurvature Bounds on the Minimal QCD Axion,arXiv:2506.03348

    arXiv

  39. [39]

    P. W. Graham, J. Mardon and S. Rajendran,Vector dark matter from inflationary fluctuations,Physical Review D 93(May 2016)

    2016

  40. [40]

    A. A. Starobinsky,Stochastic de sitter (inflationary) stage in the early universe,Lect. Notes Phys.246(1986) 107–126

    1986

  41. [41]

    Markkanen, A

    T. Markkanen, A. Rajantie, S. Stopyra and T. Tenkanen, Scalar correlation functions in de sitter space from the stochastic spectral expansion,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2019(Aug. 2019) 001–001. [41]https://github.com/skalia618/Isocurvature

    2019

  42. [42]

    M. R. Buckley, P. Du, N. Fernandez and M. J. Weikert, General constraints on isocurvature from the cmb and ly- αforest,arXiv:2502.20434

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    S. Bird, H. V. Peiris, M. Viel and L. Verde,Minimally parametric power spectrum reconstruction from the lyman αforest,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical So- ciety413(Mar. 2011) 1717–1728

    2011

  44. [44]

    P. W. Graham and H. Ramani,Constraints on dark mat- ter from dynamical heating of stars in ultrafaint dwarfs. ii. substructure and the primordial power spectrum,Phys- ical Review D110(Oct. 2024)

    2024

  45. [45]

    D. J. H. Chung, E. W. Kolb, A. Riotto and L. Senatore, Isocurvature constraints on gravitationally produced su- perheavy dark matter,Physical Review D72(July 2005)

    2005

  46. [46]

    Baumann,Cosmology

    D. Baumann,Cosmology. Cambridge University Press, 2022

    2022

  47. [47]

    Budker, J

    D. Budker, J. Eby, M. Gorghetto, M. Jiang and G. Perez, A generic formation mechanism of ultralight dark mat- ter solar halos,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2023(dec 2023) 021

    2023

  48. [48]

    Batell and A

    B. Batell and A. Ghalsasi,Thermal misalignment of scalar dark matter,Phys. Rev. D107(May 2023) L091701

    2023

  49. [49]

    Alachkar, M

    A. Alachkar, M. Fairbairn and D. J. E. Marsh,Dilatonic couplings and the relic abundance of ultralight dark mat- ter,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(May 2025) 191003

    2025

  50. [50]

    R. H. Cyburt, B. D. Fields, K. A. Olive and T.-H. Yeh,Big bang nucleosynthesis: Present status,Reviews of Modern Physics88(Feb. 2016)

    2016

  51. [51]

    Adhikari, A

    S. Adhikari, A. Banerjee, K. K. Boddy, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, H. Desmond, C. Dvorkin et al.,Astrophysical tests of dark matter self-interactions,arXiv:2207.10638

    arXiv

  52. [52]

    Wands, K

    D. Wands, K. A. Malik, D. H. Lyth and A. R. Liddle,New approach to the evolution of cosmological perturbations on large scales,Physical Review D62(July 2000)

    2000

  53. [53]

    D. H. Lyth, K. A. Malik and M. Sasaki,A general proof of the conservation of the curvature perturbation,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2005(May 2005) 004–004

    2005

  54. [54]

    Artigas, J

    D. Artigas, J. Grain and V. Vennin,Hamiltonian for- malism for cosmological perturbations: the separate- universe approach,Journal of Cosmology and Astropar- ticle Physics2022(Feb. 2022) 001

    2022

  55. [55]

    Husdal,On effective degrees of freedom in the early universe,Galaxies4(Dec

    L. Husdal,On effective degrees of freedom in the early universe,Galaxies4(Dec. 2016) 78. 9 Appendix A: Relic density calculation In this appendix, we outline the details for the com- putation of the relationship in Fig. 2. A precise calcula- tion of the relic density for the small masses appearing in Fig. 2 is too computationally difficult, as it requires...

    2016

  56. [56]

    When written in terms of the velocity field,⃗ v=⃗ q/(ρ+P), Eq

    by−a −2∇ϕ, the result can be written as ˙⃗ q+ 5H⃗ q+a−2∇P+a −2∇jΠij = 0,(B-6) where Πij =a −2 ∇iϕ∇jϕ− 1 3 (∇ϕ)2δij (B-7) is the anisotropic stress of the scalar field. When written in terms of the velocity field,⃗ v=⃗ q/(ρ+P), Eq. (B-6) can be understood as the Euler equation for a fluid. Let us make some simplifying assumptions for Eqs. (B-

  57. [57]

    First, if the production ofϕis isotropic, we can expect that Π ij ≈0 on average

    and (B-6). First, if the production ofϕis isotropic, we can expect that Π ij ≈0 on average. Second, we would like to relate the energy density and pressure via an equation of stateP=wρ. This can occur if all relevant modes are non-relativistic, 6 so that the second terms in Eqs. (B-3) and (B-4) are negligible, and moreover if we are interested in timescal...