Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 108 references

Anisotropic Gravitational Waves from Anisotropic Axion Rotation

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that a rotating axion field that briefly dominates the early universe before a kination transition can source an induced gravitational-wave background strong enough for future detectors, with pronounced large-scale…

desk verdict Solid, honest phenomenology that connects rotating axion dynamics to detectable GW anisotropies, but the main quantitative predictions rest on an O(1) coefficient that is not pinned down. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.08249 v1 pith:RPLMKABF submitted 2025-08-11 hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-th

Arushi Bodas , Keisuke Harigaya , Keisuke Inomata , Takahiro Terada , Lian-Tao Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.COhep-th
keywords inducedgravitationalwavesrotatingaxionkinationisocurvaturesuperhorizongrowthwaveanisotropyprimordialblackholesearlymatterdomination
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that a rotating axion field that temporarily takes over the universe's energy budget—first behaving like matter and then like a kinetic-energy fluid, or kination—can convert its own inflationary fluctuations into a detectable stochastic gravitational-wave background. The central mechanism is a transient enhancement: near the matter-to-kination (MK) transition, the axion's curvature perturbation dominates the total, and its phase fluctuations grow on superhorizon scales. These fluctuations later re-enter the horizon and source induced gravitational waves, both around the MK transition and, through a flat low-frequency branch, during the subsequent radiation era. A distinctive property is that the resulting wave background inherits pronounced large-scale anisotropies from the axion fluctuations—at the level $\delta_{\rm GW} = -8\,\zeta_S(k_l)$ in the rotation-dominated case and about $4\,\zeta_S(k_l)$ when the axion stays subdominant. The transient nature of the axion's dominance is what lets the scenario evade the usual CMB bounds on large perturbations.

What carries the argument

The central object is the rotating complex scalar $S = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} r e^{i\theta}$ and its conserved U(1) charge yield $Y_\theta = \dot\theta r^2/s$. The matter-to-kination (MK) transition, where the axion energy density switches from $\rho_S \propto a^{-3}$ to $\rho_S \propto a^{-6}$, temporarily boosts the axion's contribution to the total curvature perturbation and then dilutes it fast enough to evade CMB constraints. The load-bearing identity is the superhorizon growth of the phase fluctuation, Eq. (3.32), which relates the late-time GW source $\delta\chi/M_{\rm pl}$ to the primordial fluctuation $\delta_S$ with a coefficient of order one (rotation dominance) or $F_S^{1/2}$ (non-dominance). The induced-GW kernels of Eqs. (3.2), (3.13), and (3.36) carry the second-order metric perturbations that generate the stochastic background, and the separate-universe modulation of the local $Y_\theta$ produces the anisotropy coefficients in Eq. (4.6).

What would settle it

A future experiment with sensitivity comparable to DECIGO or BBO that searches the $10^{-3}$-$10^{-2}$ Hz band and finds no stochastic background with the predicted broken spectrum for benchmark parameters ($\zeta_S(k_s)\sim10^{-2}$, $T_{\rm KR}\sim10^3$ TeV) would rule out the strong-signal claim; alternatively, measuring the large-scale anisotropy and finding the peak coefficient different from $-8\,\zeta_S(k_l)$, or finding the flat-branch anisotropy not of the form $-4(1+2\Omega_{S,MK})\,\zeta_S(k_l)$, would directly contradict the mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

This paper shows that a complex scalar field with a nearly quadratic radial potential, set rotating by an Affleck-Dine type kick, produces a detectable induced gravitational-wave background if its fluctuations exceed the adiabatic ones from the inflaton. The conserved U(1) charge converts the initial angular fluctuation into a conserved curvature perturbation $\zeta_S \simeq \delta_S/3$, and the matter-to-kination transition temporarily boosts the axion's share of the total energy-momentum, enhancing the total curvature perturbation for a short time. During this phase, superhorizon modes of the angular field grow to $\delta\chi/M_{\rm pl} \simeq 2\sqrt{2/3}\,\delta_S$ in the rotation-dominated case and to $\sqrt{6}\,F_S^{1/2}\,\delta_S$ when the axion never dominates. The paper computes the induced GW power spectrum: modes entering during kination give $\Omega_{\rm GW}h^2 \simeq 2.9\times10^{-5} A_{\zeta_S}^2 (\nu/3.9\times10^{-5}\,{\rm Hz})(T_{\rm KR}/{\rm TeV})^{-1}$, while modes entering later during radiation domination give a flat branch with $\Omega_{\rm GW}(\eta_c,k)\simeq 0.175 A_{\delta\chi}^2$. The large-scale anisotropy of the background is derived using the separate-universe picture, yielding coefficients such as Eq. (4.6) for the MK-peak and Eq. (4.15) for the late flat branch. Observational constraints from primordial black hole overproduction, axion sound-wave dark radiation, late kination-to-radiation isocurvature, CMB B-modes, and non-Gaussianity are incorporated; short-wavelength fluctuations can reach $\sim 10^{-2}$, while long-wavelength fluctuations are capped at $\lesssim 10^{-3}$, mainly by non-Gaussianity.

Load-bearing premise

The prediction rests on the estimate that the axion's angular fluctuation grows on superhorizon scales as in Eq. (3.32), which assumes an instantaneous switch from matter-like to kination behavior and a simplified energy-density formula in the matter phase; a gradual transition or a factor-of-two correction there would shift the wave amplitudes and the anisotropy coefficients.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the axion rotation dominates around the MK transition, the flat part of the GW spectrum below $\nu_{MK}$ and the peak at $\nu_{MK}$ are within reach of proposed experiments such as BBO and a SQL-limited DECIGO, with low-multipole anisotropies detectable for $\zeta_S(k_l) \sim 6\times10^{-4}$.
  • Detecting both the anisotropy of the peak amplitude and the modulation of the peak frequency, $\delta\nu_{MK}/\nu_{MK} = (2\Omega_{S,MK}-1)\,\zeta_S(k_l)$, would allow independent extraction of the long-wavelength axion fluctuation $\zeta_S(k_l)$ and the axion's energy fraction $\Omega_{S,MK}$, identifying the rotating-axion origin of the background.
  • The low-frequency flat branch is sourced by modes that re-enter during the radiation era, long after the axion has diluted, so the signal does not require the axion to dominate at late times; the background nevertheless retains the large-scale anisotropy imprinted during the MK epoch.
  • In the non-dominant regime, the GW amplitude scales as $\Omega_{\rm GW} \propto F_S^2 \delta_S^4$, which is less suppressed than the naive curvature-based estimate, and the allowed short-wavelength fluctuation can be as large as $\sim10^{-2}$ while long-wavelength fluctuations are forced below about $10^{-3}$, mostly by the CMB non-Gaussianity bound.
  • The combination of amplitude, spectral shape, and anisotropy provides a rare observational window into the quantum fluctuations of a spectator axion field during inflation, because the induced background free-streams from early times to the present.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same superhorizon phase growth that sources gravitational waves also sources axion sound waves, which behave as dark radiation; cross-correlating the GW anisotropy with the imprinted dark-radiation anisotropy could in principle separate $\zeta_S(k_l)$ from the background cosmology without relying on the two frequency observables.
  • If the axion spectrum is blue-tilted enough to suppress $\zeta_S(k_l)$ while keeping $\zeta_S(k_s) \sim 10^{-2}$, the scenario avoids the non-Gaussianity cap and the short early matter era could produce primordial black holes that carry no isocurvature; those black holes would be accompanied by a flat, kination-boosted gravitational-wave signal that tests the matter-era hypothesis directly.
  • The mechanism should apply generically to any spectator sector that passes through a matter-like phase followed by kination, not only to axions from Affleck-Dine dynamics; a null search for the predicted broken, anisotropic spectrum would then constrain the duration of any such early matter era.
  • Because the anisotropy coefficient at the peak, $\delta_{\rm GW} = 4(-11 + \Omega_{S,MK} + 24/(2+\Omega_{S,MK}))\,\zeta_S(k_l)$, differs from the flat-branch coefficient $-4(1+2\Omega_{S,MK})\,\zeta_S(k_l)$, measuring the multipole spectrum at two frequencies would provide a consistency check of the model; a mismatch would point to a non-instantaneous transition or a different source.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies gravitational wave production from a rotating axion field whose energy density temporarily grows during a matter-like phase and then dilutes during a kination phase before returning to radiation domination. The authors show that the transient enhancement of the axion-induced curvature perturbation and the superhorizon growth of axion phase fluctuations can source a strong induced stochastic gravitational wave background, with a flat low-frequency part plus a feature near the matter-to-kination transition. They further show that long-wavelength axion fluctuations produce large-scale anisotropies in this background, and they compare the predicted amplitude and anisotropy with projected sensitivities of LISA, BBO, DECIGO, CE, ET, muAres, and SKA, after imposing constraints from PBH formation, axion radiation, isocurvature, CMB B-modes, and non-Gaussianity.

Significance. If the quantitative predictions are robust, this is a significant and novel contribution: it identifies a realistic rotating-axion scenario in which an induced gravitational wave background carries large isocurvature-type anisotropies, a signature that is absent in the usual adiabatic induced-GW calculations. The paper is strong in its use of standard second-order perturbation theory, in providing analytic formulas that are cross-checked numerically in several appendices, in the transparent separate-universe derivation of the anisotropy coefficients, and in the comprehensive treatment of independent observational constraints. The central mechanism, namely that kination dilution evades large-scale CMB bounds while allowing a strong signal at shorter scales, is well motivated and clearly explained. The main weakness is that the key coefficient governing the flat part of the spectrum, Eq. (3.32), is obtained through approximations whose accuracy is quantified only at the order-of-magnitude level, and the detection claims are sensitive to that coefficient.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.2.1, Eq. (3.32)]
  2. [Sec. 5.5, Eq. (5.30)]
  3. [Sec. 3.2.2, Eq. (3.44) and Figs. 3-4]
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eqs. (5.19) and (5.30)]
  2. [Sec. 3.2.1]
  3. [Fig. 7]
  4. [Eq. (3.6)]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: GW amplitudes and anisotropies are derived from independent inputs (A_ζS, FS, TMK) with external constraint-saturated benchmarks; the only self-citations are published and non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central derivations do not reduce to their inputs. The curvature power spectrum P_ζS (or P_δS) is an input; the induced GW energy density is computed from it via the standard second-order kernel, Eq. (3.2) for the kination-era peak and Eq. (3.39)/(3.44) for the flat contribution from δχ, with δχ/Mpl related to δS through the analytic estimate Eq. (3.32). The anisotropy ratios, Eq. (4.6) and Eq. (4.15), are obtained by separate-universe arguments linearly relating δYθ/Yθ to ζS = δS/3, and they do not re-import the GW amplitude. Benchmark values of ζS(kl) and ζS(ks) are chosen to saturate independent observational constraints (PBH, axion isocurvature, CMB B-mode, non-Gaussianity), not fitted to the GW signal itself. The load-bearing Eq. (3.32) is derived from an approximate energy density, Eq. (3.22), that differs from the exact r^2 θdot^2 by a factor 2; the paper acknowledges this and checks the order of magnitude numerically in Appendix D.1.1. This is a quantitative-accuracy caveat, not circularity. Self-citations with overlapping authors appear (Refs. [22,30,63,67]) for kination-era GW formulas, HKR normalization, and rotating-field perturbations, but those are published derivations and the underlying formulas are standard perturbation theory; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled in solely through self-citation. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no target result is used in its own derivation. The appropriate finding is therefore a low score reflecting only minor, non-load-bearing self-citation, consistent with the paper being otherwise self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard spectator axion dynamics and several model-specific approximations, most notably the instantaneous MK transition for the superhorizon phase fluctuation growth. No new particles or forces are invented; the rotating axion and its phonon modes are known effective entities. The main free parameters are the fluctuation amplitude, the MK temperature, and the energy fraction at MK, all scanned or set by constraints rather than fitted.

free parameters (4)
  • A_ζS (amplitude of axion curvature power spectrum) = benchmarks: ζS(ks) ~ 10^-3 - 10^-2, ζS(kl) ~ 10^-4 - 10^-3
    Controls the GW amplitude and anisotropy. Not derived from first principles; chosen to saturate observational constraints in Section 6.
  • TMK (SM temperature at matter-to-kination transition) = 100 MeV, 10^3 TeV, 10^6 TeV in benchmarks
    Sets the frequency scale of the GW spectrum. Scanned in Figures 6 and 8.
  • FS or ΩS,MK (energy fraction of axion at MK) = 0.75, 0.99 (dominance); 0.1, 0.01 (non-dominance)
    Determines the strength of curvature enhancement and the anisotropy coefficients. Scanned in Figures 6-8.
  • spectral tilt of ζS = mild blue tilt (unspecified)
    Sometimes assumed to allow larger short-wavelength fluctuations while satisfying long-wavelength bounds (Section 6, Appendix C).
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The axion angular direction is massless during inflation and develops scale-invariant fluctuations with P_θ^(1/2) = H_inf/(2π r_inf) (Eq. 2.6).
    Standard spectator axion scenario; requires H_inf and r_inf such that radial fluctuations are suppressed.
  • domain assumption The U(1) charge density n_θ is conserved after the kick up to dilution by cosmic expansion, and thermalization circularizes the orbit, yielding matter-to-kination behavior (Sec 2.1, App B).
    Core model assumption; constraints on thermalization are discussed in Appendix B.
  • domain assumption ζS = δS/3 on superhorizon scales when S is subdominant and matter-like (Eq. 2.13).
    Standard isocurvature perturbation relation in the separate universe limit.
  • domain assumption The rotating axion behaves as a fluid with equation of state w and sound speed c_s given by Eqs. (D.9)-(D.10) in the log potential model.
    Concrete model for the gradual MK transition; the GW results depend on this effective fluid description.
  • ad hoc to paper The superhorizon growth of δχ is estimated using an instantaneous MK transition and the simplified ρS expression Eq. (3.22), which differs from the exact expression by a factor of 2.
    This approximation is used to derive Eq. (3.32), the key input for late-time GWs and anisotropies.
  • standard math The separate universe approach applies for long-wavelength modulations (Sec 4).
    Used to derive anisotropy ratios like δGW = -8 ζS.
  • domain assumption The adiabatic curvature perturbation from inflation is P_ϕ ≈ 2.1e-9 and the total curvature is a weighted sum of components (Eq. 2.14).
    Standard definition and composition of curvature perturbations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Anisotropic Gravitational Waves from Anisotropic Axion Rotation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RPLMKABF

@misc{pith2026250808249,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Anisotropic Gravitational Waves from Anisotropic Axion Rotation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RPLMKABF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.08249}
}
read the original abstract

Gravitational waves (GWs) provide a powerful probe of the early universe due to their ability to free-stream across cosmic history. We study GW production in a compelling scenario where a rotating axion(-like) field becomes relevant for a brief period in the early universe before transitioning into a kination fluid and rapidly dissipating its energy through cosmic expansion. During this short epoch, the curvature perturbation can be predominantly sourced by the rotating axion and may significantly exceed the adiabatic component. Moreover, axion field perturbations grow on superhorizon scales during this phase. These effects can generate a strong stochastic background of induced GWs. This GW background also exhibits a pronounced large-scale anisotropy inherited from the axion fluctuations, serving as a distinctive signature of the scenario. Importantly, the transient nature of axion relevance enables this scenario to evade stringent bounds on large-scale perturbations. We analyze various observational constraints and find that both the amplitude and anisotropy of the resulting GW signal could be accessible to future detectors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Amaro-Seoane et al.,Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, arXiv:1702.00786

    LISA Collaboration, P. Amaro-Seoane et al.,Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, arXiv:1702.00786

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    G. M. Harry, P. Fritschel, D. A. Shaddock, W. Folkner, and E. S. Phinney,Laser interferometry for the big bang observer, Class. Quant. Grav.23 (2006) 4887–4894. [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 23, 7361 (2006)]. – 59 –

    2006

  3. [3]

    Kawamura et al.,The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna: DECIGO, Class

    S. Kawamura et al.,The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna: DECIGO, Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 094011

    2011

  4. [4]

    Sesana et al.,Unveiling the gravitational universe atµ-Hz frequencies, Exper

    A. Sesana et al.,Unveiling the gravitational universe atµ-Hz frequencies, Exper. Astron.51 (2021), no. 3 1333–1383, [arXiv:1908.11391]

    arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    Agazie et al.,The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys

    NANOGrav Collaboration, G. Agazie et al.,The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys. J. Lett.951 (2023), no. 1 L8, [arXiv:2306.16213]

    arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Braun, T

    R. Braun, T. Bourke, J. A. Green, E. Keane, and J. Wagg,Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array, PoS AASKA14 (2015) 174

    2015

  7. [7]

    E. D. Hall,Cosmic Explorer: A Next-Generation Ground-Based Gravitational-Wave Observatory, Galaxies 10 (2022), no. 4 90

    2022

  8. [8]

    Punturo et al.,The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Class

    M. Punturo et al.,The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Class. Quant. Grav.27 (2010) 194002

    2010

Show all 108 references
  1. [9]

    Roshan and G

    R. Roshan and G. White,Using gravitational waves to see the first second of the Universe, Rev. Mod. Phys.97 (2025), no. 1 015001, [arXiv:2401.04388]

    2025 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Affleck and M

    I. Affleck and M. Dine,A New Mechanism for Baryogenesis, Nucl. Phys. B249 (1985) 361–380

    1985

  3. [11]

    R. T. Co and K. Harigaya,Axiogenesis, Phys. Rev. Lett.124 (2020), no. 11 111602, [arXiv:1910.02080]

    2020 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Domcke, Y

    V. Domcke, Y. Ema, K. Mukaida, and M. Yamada,Spontaneous Baryogenesis from Axions with Generic Couplings, JHEP 08 (2020) 096, [arXiv:2006.03148]

    2020 arXiv

  5. [13]

    R. T. Co, L. J. Hall, and K. Harigaya,Predictions for Axion Couplings from ALP Cogenesis, JHEP 01 (2021) 172, [arXiv:2006.04809]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    R. T. Co, N. Fernandez, A. Ghalsasi, L. J. Hall, and K. Harigaya,Lepto-Axiogenesis, JHEP 03 (2021) 017, [arXiv:2006.05687]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [15]

    R. T. Co, L. J. Hall, and K. Harigaya,Axion Kinetic Misalignment Mechanism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020), no. 25 251802, [arXiv:1910.14152]

    2020 arXiv

  8. [16]

    R. T. Co, L. J. Hall, K. Harigaya, K. A. Olive, and S. Verner,Axion Kinetic Misalignment and Parametric Resonance from Inflation, JCAP 08 (2020) 036, [arXiv:2004.00629]

    2020 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Eröncel, R

    C. Eröncel, R. Sato, G. Servant, and P. Sørensen,ALP dark matter from kinetic fragmentation: opening up the parameter window, JCAP 10 (2022) 053, [arXiv:2206.14259]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Eröncel and G

    C. Eröncel and G. Servant,ALP dark matter mini-clusters from kinetic fragmentation, JCAP 01 (2023) 009, [arXiv:2207.10111]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Eröncel, Y

    C. Eröncel, Y. Gouttenoire, R. Sato, G. Servant, and P. Simakachorn,A New Source for (QCD) Axion Dark Matter Production: Curvature-Induced, arXiv:2503.04880

  12. [20]

    Bodas, R

    A. Bodas, R. T. Co, A. Ghalsasi, K. Harigaya, and L.-T. Wang,Acoustic Misalignment Mechanism for Axion Dark Matter, arXiv:2503.04888

  13. [21]

    Fasiello, J

    M. Fasiello, J. Lizarraga, A. Papageorgiou, and A. Urio,Kinetic Fragmentation of the QCD Axion on the Lattice, arXiv:2507.01822

  14. [22]

    R. T. Co, D. Dunsky, N. Fernandez, A. Ghalsasi, L. J. Hall, K. Harigaya, and J. Shelton, – 60 – Gravitational wave and CMB probes of axion kination, JHEP 09 (2022) 116, [arXiv:2108.09299]

    2022 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Gouttenoire, G

    Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant, and P. Simakachorn,Revealing the Primordial Irreducible Inflationary Gravitational-Wave Background with a Spinning Peccei-Quinn Axion, arXiv:2108.10328

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Tomita,Non-Linear Theory of Gravitational Instability in the Expanding Universe, Prog

    K. Tomita,Non-Linear Theory of Gravitational Instability in the Expanding Universe, Prog. Theor. Phys. 37 (1967), no. 5 831–846

    1967

  17. [25]

    K. N. Ananda, C. Clarkson, and D. Wands,The Cosmological gravitational wave background from primordial density perturbations, Phys. Rev. D75 (2007) 123518, [gr-qc/0612013]

    2007 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Baumann, P

    D. Baumann, P. J. Steinhardt, K. Takahashi, and K. Ichiki,Gravitational Wave Spectrum Induced by Primordial Scalar Perturbations, Phys. Rev. D76 (2007) 084019, [hep-th/0703290]

    2007 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Kohri and T

    K. Kohri and T. Terada,Semianalytic calculation of gravitational wave spectrum nonlinearly induced from primordial curvature perturbations, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018), no. 12 123532, [arXiv:1804.08577]

    2018 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Inomata, K

    K. Inomata, K. Kohri, T. Nakama, and T. Terada,Enhancement of Gravitational Waves Induced by Scalar Perturbations due to a Sudden Transition from an Early Matter Era to the Radiation Era, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019), no. 4 043532, [arXiv:1904.12879]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Inomata, M

    K. Inomata, M. Kawasaki, K. Mukaida, T. Terada, and T. T. Yanagida,Gravitational Wave Production right after a Primordial Black Hole Evaporation, Phys. Rev. D101 (2020), no. 12 123533, [arXiv:2003.10455]

    2020 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Harigaya, K

    K. Harigaya, K. Inomata, and T. Terada,Gravitational wave production from axion rotations right after a transition to kination, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023), no. 8 L081303, [arXiv:2305.14242]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Bartolo, D

    N. Bartolo, D. Bertacca, S. Matarrese, M. Peloso, A. Ricciardone, A. Riotto, and G. Tasinato, Anisotropies and non-Gaussianity of the Cosmological Gravitational Wave Background, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019), no. 12 121501, [arXiv:1908.00527]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Bartolo, D

    N. Bartolo, D. Bertacca, S. Matarrese, M. Peloso, A. Ricciardone, A. Riotto, and G. Tasinato, Characterizing the cosmological gravitational wave background: Anisotropies and non-Gaussianity, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020), no. 2 023527, [arXiv:1912.09433]

    2020 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Dimastrogiovanni, M

    E. Dimastrogiovanni, M. Fasiello, A. Malhotra, and G. Tasinato,Enhancing gravitational wave anisotropies with peaked scalar sources, JCAP 01 (2023) 018, [arXiv:2205.05644]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Chen and A

    C. Chen and A. Ota,Induced gravitational waves from statistically anisotropic scalar perturbations, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022), no. 6 063507, [arXiv:2205.07810]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    J.-P. Li, S. Wang, Z.-C. Zhao, and K. Kohri,Primordial non-Gaussianity fN L and anisotropies in scalar-induced gravitational waves, JCAP 10 (2023) 056, [arXiv:2305.19950]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    J.-P. Li, S. Wang, Z.-C. Zhao, and K. Kohri,Complete analysis of the background and anisotropies of scalar-induced gravitational waves: primordial non-Gaussianity fN L and g N L considered, JCAP 06 (2024) 039, [arXiv:2309.07792]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Wang, Z.-C

    S. Wang, Z.-C. Zhao, J.-P. Li, and Q.-H. Zhu,Implications of pulsar timing array data for scalar-induced gravitational waves and primordial black holes: Primordial non-Gaussianity fNL considered, Phys. Rev. Res.6 (2024), no. 1 L012060, [arXiv:2307.00572]. – 61 –

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Yu and S

    Y.-H. Yu and S. Wang,Anisotropies in scalar-induced gravitational-wave background from inflaton-curvaton mixed scenario with sound speed resonance, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024), no. 8 083501, [arXiv:2310.14606]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    J. Á. Ruiz and J. Rey,Gravitational waves in ultra-slow-roll and their anisotropy at two loops, JCAP 04 (2025) 026, [arXiv:2410.09014]

    2025 arXiv

  32. [40]

    J.-P. Li, S. Wang, Z.-C. Zhao, and K. Kohri,The isotropy, anisotropies and non-Gaussianity of the scalar-induced gravitational-wave background: diagrammatic approach for primordial non-Gaussianity up to any order, arXiv:2505.16820

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Bartolo et al.,Probing anisotropies of the Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with LISA, JCAP 11 (2022) 009, [arXiv:2201.08782]

    LISA Cosmology W orking Group Collaboration, N. Bartolo et al.,Probing anisotropies of the Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with LISA, JCAP 11 (2022) 009, [arXiv:2201.08782]

    2022 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Kudoh, A

    H. Kudoh, A. Taruya, T. Hiramatsu, and Y. Himemoto,Detecting a gravitational-wave background with next-generation space interferometers, Phys. Rev. D73 (2006) 064006, [gr-qc/0511145]

    2006 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Mentasti, C

    G. Mentasti, C. Contaldi, and M. Peloso,Prospects for detecting anisotropies and polarization of the stochastic gravitational wave background with ground-based detectors, JCAP 08 (2023) 053, [arXiv:2304.06640]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    P. F. Depta, V. Domcke, G. Franciolini, and M. Pieroni,Pulsar timing array sensitivity to anisotropies in the gravitational wave background, Phys. Rev. D111 (2025), no. 8 083039, [arXiv:2407.14460]

    2025 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Cusin, C

    G. Cusin, C. Pitrou, M. Pijnenburg, and A. Sesana,Measuring anisotropies in the PTA band with cross-correlations, arXiv:2502.17401

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Kumar, R

    S. Kumar, R. Sundrum, and Y. Tsai,Non-Gaussian stochastic gravitational waves from phase transitions, JHEP 11 (2021) 107, [arXiv:2102.05665]

    2021 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Bodas and R

    A. Bodas and R. Sundrum,Primordial clocks within stochastic gravitational wave anisotropies, JCAP 10 (2022) 012, [arXiv:2205.04482]

    2022 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Geller, A

    M. Geller, A. Hook, R. Sundrum, and Y. Tsai,Primordial Anisotropies in the Gravitational Wave Background from Cosmological Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.121 (2018), no. 20 201303, [arXiv:1803.10780]

    2018 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Bodas and R

    A. Bodas and R. Sundrum,Large primordial fluctuations in gravitational waves from phase transitions, JHEP 06 (2023) 029, [arXiv:2211.09301]

    2023 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Domcke, K

    V. Domcke, K. Harigaya, and K. Mukaida,Charge transfer between rotating complex scalar fields, JHEP 08 (2022) 234, [arXiv:2205.00942]

    2022 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Shtanov, J

    Y. Shtanov, J. H. Traschen, and R. H. Brandenberger,Universe reheating after inflation, Phys. Rev. D51 (1995) 5438–5455, [hep-ph/9407247]

    1995 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Kofman, A

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky,Reheating after inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett.73 (1994) 3195–3198, [hep-th/9405187]

    1994 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Kofman, A

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky,Towards the theory of reheating after inflation, Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) 3258–3295, [hep-ph/9704452]

    1997 arXiv

  46. [54]

    M. A. Fedderke, J. Huang, and N. Siemonsen,Periodic Cosmic String Formation and Dynamics, arXiv:2503.03116. – 62 –

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    Tkachev,Phase transitions at preheating, Phys

    I. Tkachev,Phase transitions at preheating, Phys. Lett. B376 (1996) 35–40, [hep-th/9510146]

    1996 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Kasuya, M

    S. Kasuya, M. Kawasaki, and T. Yanagida,Cosmological axion problem in chaotic inflationary universe, Phys. Lett. B409 (1997) 94–100, [hep-ph/9608405]

    1997 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Kasuya and M

    S. Kasuya and M. Kawasaki,Can topological defects be formed during preheating?, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 7597–7607, [hep-ph/9703354]

    1997 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Kasuya and M

    S. Kasuya and M. Kawasaki,Topological defects formation after inflation on lattice simulation, Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 083516, [hep-ph/9804429]

    1998 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Tkachev, S

    I. Tkachev, S. Khlebnikov, L. Kofman, and A. D. Linde,Cosmic strings from preheating, Phys. Lett. B440 (1998) 262–268, [hep-ph/9805209]

    1998 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Kasuya and M

    S. Kasuya and M. Kawasaki,Comments on cosmic string formation during preheating on lattice simulations, Phys. Rev. D61 (2000) 083510, [hep-ph/9903324]

    2000 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Enqvist and J

    K. Enqvist and J. McDonald,Observable isocurvature fluctuations from the Affleck-Dine condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.83 (1999) 2510–2513, [hep-ph/9811412]

    1999 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Kasuya, M

    S. Kasuya, M. Kawasaki, and F. Takahashi,Isocurvature fluctuations in Affleck-Dine mechanism and constraints on inflation models, JCAP 10 (2008) 017, [arXiv:0805.4245]

    2008 arXiv

  55. [63]

    R. T. Co, K. Harigaya, and A. Pierce,Cosmic perturbations from a rotating field, JCAP 10 (2022) 037, [arXiv:2202.01785]

    2022 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Inomata, K

    K. Inomata, K. Kohri, T. Nakama, and T. Terada,Gravitational Waves Induced by Scalar Perturbations during a Gradual Transition from an Early Matter Era to the Radiation Era, JCAP 10 (2019) 071, [arXiv:1904.12878]. [Erratum: JCAP 08, E01 (2023)]

    2019 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Pearce, L

    M. Pearce, L. Pearce, G. White, and C. Balázs,Gravitational Wave Signals From Early Matter Domination: Interpolating Between Fast and Slow Transitions, arXiv:2311.12340

    arXiv

  58. [66]

    Domènech,Induced gravitational waves in a general cosmological background, Int

    G. Domènech,Induced gravitational waves in a general cosmological background, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 29 (2020), no. 03 2050028, [arXiv:1912.05583]

    2020 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Harigaya, K

    K. Harigaya, K. Inomata, and T. Terada,Induced gravitational waves with kination era for recent pulsar timing array signals, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023), no. 12 123538, [arXiv:2309.00228]

    2023 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Domènech, S

    G. Domènech, S. Passaglia, and S. Renaux-Petel,Gravitational waves from dark matter isocurvature, JCAP 03 (2022), no. 03 023, [arXiv:2112.10163]

    2022 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Domènech,Cosmological gravitational waves from isocurvature fluctuations, AAPPS Bull

    G. Domènech,Cosmological gravitational waves from isocurvature fluctuations, AAPPS Bull. 34 (2024), no. 1 4, [arXiv:2311.02065]

    2024 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Eröncel, Y

    C. Eröncel, Y. Gouttenoire, R. Sato, G. Servant, and P. Simakachorn,A universal bound on the duration of a kination era, arXiv:2501.17226

  63. [71]

    Inomata,Bound on induced gravitational waves during inflation era, Phys

    K. Inomata,Bound on induced gravitational waves during inflation era, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021), no. 12 123525, [arXiv:2109.06192]

    2021 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Mukhanov,Physical Foundations of Cosmology

    V. Mukhanov,Physical Foundations of Cosmology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2005

    2005

  65. [73]

    Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020) A6, [arXiv:1807.06209]. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    2020 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Dodelson,Modern cosmology

    S. Dodelson,Modern cosmology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2003. – 63 –

    2003

  67. [75]

    R.-G. Cai, S. Pi, and M. Sasaki,Universal infrared scaling of gravitational wave background spectra, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020), no. 8 083528, [arXiv:1909.13728]

    2020 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Rey,A consistency relation for induced gravitational wave anisotropies, arXiv:2411.08873

    J. Rey,A consistency relation for induced gravitational wave anisotropies, arXiv:2411.08873

    arXiv

  69. [77]

    Saito and J

    R. Saito and J. Yokoyama,Gravitational wave background as a probe of the primordial black hole abundance, Phys. Rev. Lett.102 (2009) 161101, [arXiv:0812.4339]. [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.107,069901(2011)]

    2009 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Saito and J

    R. Saito and J. Yokoyama,Gravitational-Wave Constraints on the Abundance of Primordial Black Holes, Prog. Theor. Phys.123 (2010) 867–886, [arXiv:0912.5317]. [Erratum: Prog. Theor. Phys.126,351(2011)]

    2010 arXiv

  71. [79]

    M. Y. Khlopov and A. Polnarev,Primordial black holes as a cosmological test of grand unification, Physics Letters B97 (1980), no. 3-4 383–387

    1980

  72. [80]

    A. G. Polnarev and M. Y. Khlopov,COSMOLOGY, PRIMORDIAL BLACK HOLES, AND SUPERMASSIVE PARTICLES, Sov. Phys. Usp.28 (1985) 213–232

    1985

  73. [81]

    Harada, C.-M

    T. Harada, C.-M. Yoo, K. Kohri, K.-i. Nakao, and S. Jhingan,Primordial black hole formation in the matter-dominated phase of the Universe, Astrophys. J. 833 (2016), no. 1 61, [arXiv:1609.01588]

    2016 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Harada, C.-M

    T. Harada, C.-M. Yoo, K. Kohri, and K.-I. Nakao,Spins of primordial black holes formed in the matter-dominated phase of the Universe, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017), no. 8 083517, [arXiv:1707.03595]

    2017 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Kokubu, K

    T. Kokubu, K. Kyutoku, K. Kohri, and T. Harada,Effect of Inhomogeneity on Primordial Black Hole Formation in the Matter Dominated Era, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018), no. 12 123024, [arXiv:1810.03490]

    2018 arXiv

  76. [84]

    de Jong, J

    E. de Jong, J. C. Aurrekoetxea, and E. A. Lim,Primordial black hole formation with full numerical relativity, JCAP 03 (2022), no. 03 029, [arXiv:2109.04896]

    2022 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Harada, K

    T. Harada, K. Kohri, M. Sasaki, T. Terada, and C.-M. Yoo,Threshold of primordial black hole formation against velocity dispersion in matter-dominated era, JCAP 02 (2023) 038, [arXiv:2211.13950]

    2023 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Harada, C.-M

    T. Harada, C.-M. Yoo, and K. Kohri,Threshold of primordial black hole formation, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013), no. 8 084051, [arXiv:1309.4201]. [Erratum: Phys. Rev.D89,no.2,029903(2014)]

    2013 arXiv

  79. [87]

    B. Carr, M. Raidal, T. Tenkanen, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veermäe,Primordial black hole constraints for extended mass functions, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017), no. 2 023514, [arXiv:1705.05567]

    2017 arXiv

  80. [88]

    B. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda, and J. Yokoyama,Constraints on primordial black holes, Reports on Progress in Physics84 (2021), no. 11 116902

    2021

  81. [89]

    Akrami et al.,Planck 2018 results

    Planck Collaboration, Y. Akrami et al.,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation, Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020) A10, [arXiv:1807.06211]

    2020 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Akita and M

    K. Akita and M. Yamaguchi,A Review of Neutrino Decoupling from the Early Universe to the Current Universe, Universe 8 (2022), no. 11 552, [arXiv:2210.10307]

    2022 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Komatsu and D

    E. Komatsu and D. N. Spergel,Acoustic signatures in the primary microwave background bispectrum, Phys. Rev. D63 (2001) 063002, [astro-ph/0005036]. – 64 –

    2001 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Akrami et al.,Planck 2018 results

    Planck Collaboration, Y. Akrami et al.,Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity, Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020) A9, [arXiv:1905.05697]

    2020 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Schmitz,New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Signals from Cosmological Phase Transitions, JHEP 01 (2021) 097, [arXiv:2002.04615]

    K. Schmitz,New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Signals from Cosmological Phase Transitions, JHEP 01 (2021) 097, [arXiv:2002.04615]

    2021 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Alonso, C

    D. Alonso, C. R. Contaldi, G. Cusin, P. G. Ferreira, and A. I. Renzini,Noise angular power spectrum of gravitational wave background experiments, Phys. Rev. D101 (2020), no. 12 124048, [arXiv:2005.03001]

    2020 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Braglia and S

    M. Braglia and S. Kuroyanagi,Probing prerecombination physics by the cross-correlation of stochastic gravitational waves and CMB anisotropies, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021), no. 12 123547, [arXiv:2106.03786]

    2021 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Mukaida and K

    K. Mukaida and K. Nakayama,Dynamics of oscillating scalar field in thermal environment, JCAP 01 (2013) 017, [arXiv:1208.3399]

    2013 arXiv

  89. [97]

    D. H. Lyth, C. Ungarelli, and D. Wands,The Primordial density perturbation in the curvaton scenario, Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 023503, [astro-ph/0208055]

    2003 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Sasaki, J

    M. Sasaki, J. Valiviita, and D. Wands,Non-Gaussianity of the primordial perturbation in the curvaton model, Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 103003, [astro-ph/0607627]

    2006 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Sasaki and E

    M. Sasaki and E. D. Stewart,A General analytic formula for the spectral index of the density perturbations produced during inflation, Prog. Theor. Phys.95 (1996) 71–78, [astro-ph/9507001]

    1996 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Wands, K

    D. Wands, K. A. Malik, D. H. Lyth, and A. R. Liddle,A New approach to the evolution of cosmological perturbations on large scales, Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 043527, [astro-ph/0003278]

    2000 arXiv

  93. [101]

    D. H. Lyth, K. A. Malik, and M. Sasaki,A General proof of the conservation of the curvature perturbation, JCAP 05 (2005) 004, [astro-ph/0411220]

    2005 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Kawasaki, T

    M. Kawasaki, T. Kobayashi, and F. Takahashi,Non-Gaussianity from Curvatons Revisited, Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 123506, [arXiv:1107.6011]

    2011 arXiv

  95. [103]

    M. Dine, L. Randall, and S. D. Thomas,Baryogenesis from flat directions of the supersymmetric standard model, Nucl. Phys. B458 (1996) 291–326, [hep-ph/9507453]

    1996 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Harigaya, M

    K. Harigaya, M. Ibe, M. Kawasaki, and T. T. Yanagida,Dynamics of Peccei-Quinn Breaking Field after Inflation and Axion Isocurvature Perturbations, JCAP 1511 (2015), no. 11 003, [arXiv:1507.00119]

    2015 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Elgamal and K

    S. Elgamal and K. Harigaya,Dynamical Solution to the Eta Problem in Spectator Field Models, arXiv:2502.01898

  98. [106]

    K. S. Thorne,Nonspherical Gravitational Collapse–A Short Review, inMagic Without Magic: John Archibald Wheeler(J. R. Klauder, ed.), p. 231. 1972

    1972

  99. [107]

    Doroshkevich,Spatial structure of perturbations and origin of galactic rotation in fluctuation theory, Astrophysics 6 (1970), no

    A. Doroshkevich,Spatial structure of perturbations and origin of galactic rotation in fluctuation theory, Astrophysics 6 (1970), no. 4 320–330

    1970

  100. [108]

    B. J. Carr,The Primordial black hole mass spectrum, Astrophys. J. 201 (1975) 1–19. – 65 –

    1975

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.