Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Metrology of weak quantum perturbations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.03820 v1 pith:RPP4MKA6 submitted 2023-10-05 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords boldsymbollambdacouplingsmeasurementsstatetildeconsiderinitial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We consider quantum systems with a Hamiltonian containing a weak perturbation i.e. $\boldsymbol{H=H_0} + \boldsymbol{\lambda} \cdot \boldsymbol{\tilde{H}}$, $\boldsymbol{\lambda}= \{\lambda_1, \lambda_2,...\}$, $\boldsymbol{\tilde{H}}$ $= \{H_1, H_2,...\}$, $\left|\boldsymbol{\lambda}\right| \ll 1$, and address situations where $\boldsymbol{\tilde{H}}$ is known but the values of the couplings $\boldsymbol{\lambda}$ are unknown, and should be determined by performing measurements on the system. We consider two scenarios: in the first one we assume that measurements are performed on a given stationary state of the system, e.g., the ground state, whereas in the second one an initial state is prepared and then measured after evolution. In both cases, we look for the optimal measurements to estimate the couplings and evaluate the ultimate limits to precision. In particular, we derive general results for one and two couplings, and analyze in details some specific qubit models. Our results indicates that dynamical estimation schemes may provide enhanced precision upon a suitable choice of the initial preparation and the interaction time.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When Thinking Fails: The Pitfalls of Reasoning for Instruction-Following in LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Chain-of-thought prompting degrades instruction-following accuracy on IFEval and ComplexBench across most tested models, and selective reasoning can partially recover the loss.

Pith tools