Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

This paper claims that superradiant instability of a Kerr-Newman black hole with a massive charged scalar field is exactly the overlap of the quasibound-state condition μ > qQ/M and the superradiant condition, with the instability boundary

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 08:18 UTC pith:RQDOWPJU

load-bearing objection A useful analytic map of KN superradiant instability, but the central quartic is borrowed and the derivation of the threshold does not follow as written — referee it, but require the derivation. the 5 major comments →

arxiv 2510.21256 v4 pith:RQDOWPJU submitted 2025-10-24 gr-qc hep-th

Exact Regions of Superradiant Instability of Kerr-Newman Black Holes and Massive Scalar Fields

John Adrian B. Baybay , Kevin T. Grosvenor This is my paper
classification gr-qc hep-th MSC 83C57 PACS 04.70.Bw
keywords superradianceKerr-Newman black holemassive charged scalar fieldquasibound statesconfluent Heun equationcharacteristic quarticgrowth rate boundaryblack hole stability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to characterize, exactly and without approximation, where a Kerr-Newman black hole becomes unstable to superradiance when surrounded by a massive charged scalar field. Using the exact polynomial (quartic) resonance condition for the field modes, the authors show that quasibound states exist only when the scalar mass exceeds μ0 = qQ/M, and that the instability region is precisely the overlap of this condition with the superradiant frequency condition. They derive first- and second-order perturbative formulas and an exact closed-form expression for the boundary line where the mode growth rate changes sign. The sharp consequence is that the instability region moves from nearly neutral, Kerr-like black holes for light fields to highly charged, near-extremal Kerr-Newman black holes for heavier fields, with no instability in the Reissner-Nordström limit.

Core claim

The central discovery is that the superradiant-instability boundary can be stated exactly: quasibound states require μ > μ0 = qQ/M, superradiance requires μ < ωc, and the line along which the growth rate Im(Mω) turns negative is given by the exact closed-form expression (5.8), together with its perturbative approximations (5.5) and (5.6). The paper obtains these by working directly with the roots of the characteristic quartic resonance equation (3.11), rather than the hydrogenic approximation. It also shows that a widely used numerical boundary of earlier work is shifted, because that work fixed the separation constant at the hydrogenic value rather than letting the exact (λ-independent) res

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the characteristic resonance equation (3.11), a quartic polynomial in the mode frequency ω obtained by demanding polynomial (confluent Heun) solutions of the radial Klein-Gordon equation in the Kerr-Newman background. From this quartic the paper derives the quasibound threshold μ0 = qQ/M, the sign of Re√(μ²−ω²), and the closed-form boundary formulas (5.5), (5.6), (5.8) for the growth-rate cutoff. The quartic's noted independence from the angular separation constant λ is what lets the region plots be drawn without first solving the angular equation.

Load-bearing premise

The whole derivation rests on the characteristic quartic (3.11), imported with a modified leading coefficient a0 and with the asserted λ-independence; if that quartic is not the exact resonance condition, every boundary and region plot in the paper inherits the error.

What would settle it

Integrate the full separated Klein-Gordon radial equation (2.9) numerically, using the exact spheroidal eigenvalue λ obtained by solving the angular equation (2.8), and scan across the predicted boundary (5.8); if the sign change of Imω occurs at a value of μM that differs from (5.8), or if the boundary shifts with ℓ, the central claim fails. A cheaper check is to re-derive the quartic from the confluent Heun polynomial condition and verify the coefficient a0 = −(Mμ−Qq)²D²μ².

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The instability region in black-hole parameter space becomes a pair of inequalities: μ > qQ/M for quasibound states and μ < ωc for superradiance, with the growth-rate cutoff in closed form (5.8).
  • Region plots such as fig. 3b give the exact (a,Q) unstable domain for any scalar mass μ, replacing numerical scans.
  • Existing numerical results used as benchmarks for the instability boundary should be re-evaluated; the paper's exact boundary shifts the point where the growth rate turns negative.
  • In the Reissner-Nordström limit the instability region collapses to points, reaffirming the known stability of charged, non-rotating black holes against this mechanism.
  • The method extends to other asymptotically flat black hole families and higher-spin fields without the hydrogenic limit.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the resonance equation is claimed to be independent of λ, the paper implicitly predicts that the instability boundary is identical for all angular quantum numbers ℓ, not just the ℓ=1 mode; an independent numerical solution of the full separated system (including the spheroidal eigenvalue) could test this directly.
  • The exact boundary (5.8) offers a parameter-free benchmark: a time-domain simulation of a charged scalar field on a Kerr-Newman background near the predicted line should show the onset of exponential growth at the analytic value of μM.
  • The same quartic machinery could be carried over to dyonic (magnetically charged) black holes, where μ0 would generalize to include a magnetic charge product; if the quartic structure survives, the instability region would again be an overlap of two inequalities.
  • For ultralight scalar fields (μM ≪ 1) the threshold μ0 = qQ/M confines instability to black holes with tiny charge Q < μ, so axion-like models remain effectively Kerr-like; the paper's exact formulas make this separation quantitative.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the superradiant instability of Kerr-Newman black holes coupled to a massive, charged scalar field. Using the Vieira-Bezerra-Kokkotas (VBK) method, it takes the quartic characteristic equation (3.11) for the quasibound frequency ω as its starting point and derives analytic conditions for the existence of quasibound and superradiant modes. The central claims are: (i) quasibound states exist only for μ > μ0 = qQ/M; (ii) the superradiant instability region is the overlap of the quasibound condition with the superradiance condition μ < ω_c; (iii) the boundary where Im ω changes sign is given by the exact expression (5.8), with perturbative approximations (5.5)-(5.6); and (iv) the numerical boundary of Furuhashi and Nambu [45] is inaccurate because it uses λ = ℓ(ℓ+1). The paper includes region plots in the (a,Q) plane and comparison plots with [45].

Significance. If the central quartic (3.11) is correct, the paper would be a substantial contribution: it provides parameter-free analytic boundaries of the superradiant-instability region without the hydrogenic approximation, makes falsifiable predictions about the parameter space, and offers a concrete explanation for a known numerical discrepancy. The algebraic reductions are mostly transparent, and the figures clearly illustrate the claimed regions and boundaries. However, the entire analysis rests on a characteristic equation that is imported from [36] and modified without derivation, so the significance is conditional on the correctness and provenance of that equation.

major comments (5)
  1. [§3, Eqs. (3.11)-(3.12a)] The characteristic quartic is the foundation of every subsequent result. The coefficients are said to coincide with those of [36] except for a0, which is changed to a0 = -(Mμ-Qq)^2 D^2 μ^2 without derivation. Since this coefficient is precisely what generates the quasibound threshold μ0 = qQ/M in Eq. (4.9), an unverified or incorrect a0 would invalidate all central claims. Please provide a derivation of (3.11) from the confluent-Heun polynomial condition, or at least a direct verification against [36] explaining why a0 differs from the published expression.
  2. [§4.1, Eq. (4.8)] Equation (3.11) is written as Σ_{n=0}^4 a_n(ω^n - μ^n) = 0. At ω = μ, every term vanishes, so the equation is identically satisfied for all μ. The paper's statement that at the quasibound boundary ω = μ and 'the equation reduces to (Mμ-Qq)^2 D^2 μ^2 = 0' does not follow directly from (3.11). An additional argument is needed, e.g. that the physical mode corresponds to a double root at the boundary or that the original resonance condition is actually Σ a_n ω^n = 0 before rearrangement. Without such an argument, the derivation of μ0 and all subsequent region boundaries is not logically established.
  3. [§4.2, Eq. (4.13) and Fig. 3] The instability regions in Fig. 3 are plotted using the inequality μ < ω_c with ω_c = (ma + qQ r_+)/(r_+^2 + a^2), which follows from (4.13) after replacing ω by μ via ω ≲ μ. This is an approximation, not an exact condition, unless Re ω = μ is proven for the relevant modes. Moreover, Section 5 shows that the boundary where Im ω changes sign is μ1, not simply ω_c, so the overlap plotted in Fig. 3b may not be the exact superradiant-instability region claimed in the title and abstract. Please either justify exactness or label Fig. 3 as the approximate/superradiance-region plot with a clear caveat.
  4. [§5, Eq. (5.8)] The exact expression for μ1, the boundary where Im ω = 0, is stated as 'Surprisingly, it is possible to solve for μ1 exactly' but no derivation is given. Since Eq. (5.8) is a headline exact result and is used to benchmark the numerical discrepancy with [45], the reader cannot verify it from (3.11) as presented. Please supply a derivation or a detailed outline, including the branch choices for the square roots.
  5. [§5.1, last paragraph] The paper asserts that the characteristic resonance equation is independent of the separation constant λ, but this is not proved here; it is borrowed from [36]. This λ-independence is load-bearing for the argument that the numerics of [45] are inaccurate because they set λ = ℓ(ℓ+1). If λ does not cancel from the resonance condition, the quartic (3.11) is incomplete and the discrepancy explanation collapses. Please include a proof or a more explicit derivation of the λ-independence, rather than relying solely on a statement from [36].
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2, after Eq. (2.10)] The name 'Viera' should be 'Vieira' (also in the reference to the VBK method).
  2. [Eq. (4.1)] The near-horizon radial behavior is written as C1 (r - r_+) e^{-i(ω-ω_c)/(2κ_+)}, which appears to be missing the power of (r - r_+) in the exponential. It should presumably be (r - r_+)^{-i(ω-ω_c)/(2κ_+)}.
  3. [Fig. 5] The Furuhashi-Nambu boundary in the figure is described as plotted 'by eye' as approximately linear. Since the comparison with [45] is a central quantitative claim, please provide the actual numerical data points or a reproducible extraction method, rather than an eyeballed line.
  4. [References] Reference [48] contains a typo: 'Phys Lett B' should be 'Phys. Lett. B'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

The quasibound threshold μ0=qQ/M is effectively read off from the zero of the altered a0 coefficient; Eq. (3.11) as written is identically satisfied at ω=μ, so the central threshold is an input by construction rather than a derived result.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Eq. (3.11)–(3.12a) and Sec. 4.1, around (4.7)–(4.9)]
    "Finally, the characteristic resonance equation reads ∑_{n=0}^4 a_n(ω^n−μ^n)=0, where a0=−(Mμ−Qq)^2D^2μ^2 ... Note that the coefficients a_n above coincide with those in [36] except for a0. ... Therefore, ω=μ at the boundary of the quasibound-state region, in which case the equation reduces to (Mμ−Qq)^2D^2μ^2=0, the nontrivial solution to which is μ=μ0≡Qq/M."

    With (3.11) written as ∑a_n(ω^n−μ^n)=0, the point ω=μ makes every term vanish, so the equation cannot single out a0=0. The only way the text obtains (4.8) is to zero the factor (Mμ−Qq)^2 that appears in the stated a0 and that the authors explicitly flag as the one coefficient differing from [36]. Thus μ0=qQ/M is a restatement of the input coefficient a0, not a consequence of the resonance condition. All later quasibound boundaries (e.g., Q<μ for M=q=1) and the expansions around μ0 inherit this definitional input.

full rationale

There is no self-citation problem: the load-bearing characteristic equation is imported from the external reference [36], and the paper's authors are not the authors of that reference. However, the derivation of the central quasibound threshold is circular/definitional in a specific, quotable way. The paper rewrites the characteristic equation as ∑a_n(ω^n−μ^n)=0 with a0 containing the factor (Mμ−Qq)^2. At ω=μ this equation is identically zero, so it cannot 'reduce' to (4.8); the claimed reduction is only possible by setting the inserted factor to zero. Since no derivation of the altered a0 is given, the advertised result μ0=qQ/M is not derived from the quartic but is effectively built into the one coefficient the paper changed relative to [36]. Other parts of the paper—the superradiant inequality (4.12)–(4.13), the algebra leading to (4.14), and the perturbation expansions around μ0—are not themselves circular once (3.11) is accepted, but they all inherit the definitional μ0. This is therefore a partial circularity concentrated in the paper's main new physical threshold, warranting a score of 6 rather than a clean 0–2.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the imported VBK characteristic equation and the polynomial/overtone truncation; no parameters are fitted to data. The claimed exact boundaries are algebraic consequences of (3.11) plus standard superradiance conditions.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The quartic characteristic resonance equation (3.11) is the exact condition for quasibound frequencies in the Kerr-Newman + charged scalar system.
    Imported from Vieira-Bezerra-Muniz [36], with a0 changed; all later analytic results in §4 and §5 follow from it and it is not rederived in this paper.
  • domain assumption Requiring the confluent Heun solution to truncate at a non-negative integer overtone N yields physical quasibound states and the correct root (ω≈μ) of the quartic.
    Standard VBK polynomial-condition logic; the paper does not prove uniqueness or the root-selection rule.
  • domain assumption The characteristic frequency equation does not depend on the angular separation constant λ.
    Asserted as 'a remarkable fact' following [36] and used to explain the disagreement with Furuhashi-Nambu; no proof is given in this paper.
  • standard math The superradiant critical frequency is ω_c = (ma + qQ r_+) / (r_+^2 + a^2).
    Standard superradiance condition, used in §4.2 as equation (4.12).
  • domain assumption Quasibound condition is Re√(μ^2−ω^2) > 0, with boundary ω=μ.
    Asymptotic boundary condition at infinity, equations (4.5)–(4.7); standard for bound states.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 14209 in / 12902 out tokens · 112537 ms · 2026-08-04T08:18:40.299766+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the superradiant instability of Kerr-Newman black holes in the presence of a massive, charged scalar field using the Vieira-Bezerra-Kokkotas (VBK) method. We study the solutions of the exact polynomial condition for quasibound state frequencies and determine the domain of superradiant instability in parameter space without relying on the hydrogenic approximation or numerics. We derive the minimum scalar mass needed for quasibound states to exist, and identify the precise overlap region between the quasibound and superradiant conditions where instability can occur. We obtain perturbative and exact analytic expressions for the instability boundaries and growth rates, and clarify their relation to previous numerical results. Our analysis reveals how the instability region shifts from nearly neutral Kerr black holes for light fields to highly charged near-extremal Kerr-Newman black holes for heavier fields, while remaining absent in the Reissner-Nordstrom limit.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Exact Solution of the Non-minimally Coupled Klein-Gordon Equation in the Schwarzschild Star

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Exact solution of non-minimally coupled massive Klein-Gordon equation in Schwarzschild star metric expressed via general Heun function after geometry-induced coordinate transformation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 40 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    P. S. Cole, G. Bertone, A. Coogan, D. Gaggero, T. Karydas, B. J. Kavanagh et al., Distinguishing environmental effects on binary black hole gravitational waveforms,Nature Astron.7(2023) 943–950, [2211.01362]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Cardoso, K

    V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. P. Macedo and A. Maselli,Black holes in galaxies: Environmental impact on gravitational-wave generation and propagation,Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) L061501, [2109.00005]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    Sarmah, H

    P. Sarmah, H. Verma, K. Cheung and J. Silk,Effects of superradiance in active galactic nuclei, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.538(2025) 943–962, [2404.09955]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Lupsasca, D

    A. Lupsasca, D. R. Mayerson, B. Ripperda and S. Staelens,A Beginner’s Guide to Black Hole Imaging and Associated Tests of General Relativity, inRecent Progress on Gravity Tests. Challenges and Future Perspectives(C. Bambi and A. Cardenas-Avendano, eds.), pp. 183–237. Springer, 2024.2402.01290

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    M. S. Oei, M. J. Hardcastle, R. Timmerman et al.,Black hole jets on the scale of the cosmic web,Nature633(2024) 537–541, [2411.08630]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Brito,Black holes as laboratories: searching for ultralight fields,Gen

    R. Brito,Black holes as laboratories: searching for ultralight fields,Gen. Rel. Grav.57(2025) 42

    2025

  7. [7]

    Blas,Black hole superradiance to search for new particles, in33rd Rencontres de Blois: Exploring the Dark Universe, 11, 2022,2211.02067

    D. Blas,Black hole superradiance to search for new particles, in33rd Rencontres de Blois: Exploring the Dark Universe, 11, 2022,2211.02067

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    L. Hui, Y. T. A. Law, L. Santoni, G. Sun, G. M. Tomaselli and E. Trincherini,Black hole superradiance with dark matter accretion,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 104018, [2208.06408]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Brito, V

    R. Brito, V. Cardoso and P. Pani,Superradiance: New Frontiers in Black Hole Physics,Lect. Notes Phys.906(2015) pp.1–237, [1501.06570]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  10. [10]

    J. D. Bekenstein and M. Schiffer,The Many faces of superradiance,Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 064014, [gr-qc/9803033]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  11. [11]

    D. M. Lukin, M. A. Guidry, J. Yang, M. Ghezellou, S. D. Mishra, H. Abe et al.,Optical superradiance of a pair of color centers in an integrated silicon-carbide-on-insulator microresonator,2202.04845

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    Sierra, S

    E. Sierra, S. J. Masson and A. Asenjo-Garcia,Dicke Superradiance in Ordered Lattices: Dimensionality Matters,Phys. Rev. Res.4(2022) 023207, [2110.08380]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    Str´ ansk´ y and P

    P. Str´ ansk´ y and P. Cejnar,Superradiance in finite quantum systems randomly coupled to continuum,Phys. Rev. E100(2019) 042119, [1907.11576]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    Eleuch and I

    H. Eleuch and I. Rotter,Open quantum systems and Dicke superradiance,Eur. Phys. J. D68 (2014) 74, [1305.2762]. – 17 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  15. [15]

    W. H. Press and S. A. Teukolsky,Floating Orbits, Superradiant Scattering and the Black-hole Bomb,Nature238(1972) 211–212

    1972

  16. [16]

    Cardoso, O

    V. Cardoso, O. J. C. Dias, J. P. S. Lemos and S. Yoshida,The Black hole bomb and superradiant instabilities,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 044039, [hep-th/0404096]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  17. [17]

    Damour, N

    T. Damour, N. Deruelle and R. Ruffini,On Quantum Resonances in Stationary Geometries, Lett. Nuovo Cim.15(1976) 257–262

    1976

  18. [18]

    T. J. Zouros and D. M. Eardley,Instabilities of massive scalar perturbations of a rotating black hole,Annals of Physics118(1979) 139–155

    1979

  19. [19]

    Baumann, H

    D. Baumann, H. S. Chia, J. Stout and L. ter Haar,The Spectra of Gravitational Atoms,JCAP 12(2019) 006, [1908.10370]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    O. J. C. Dias, G. Lingetti, P. Pani and J. E. Santos,Black hole superradiant instability for massive spin-2 fields,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) L041502, [2304.01265]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    G. M. Tomaselli, T. F. M. Spieksma and G. Bertone,Legacy of Boson Clouds on Black Hole Binaries,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 121402, [2407.12908]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    G. M. Tomaselli, T. F. M. Spieksma and G. Bertone,Resonant history of gravitational atoms in black hole binaries,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 064048, [2403.03147]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [24]

    Baryakhtar, R

    M. Baryakhtar, R. Lasenby and M. Teo,Black Hole Superradiance Signatures of Ultralight Vectors,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 035019, [1704.05081]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  24. [25]

    Vicente, V

    R. Vicente, V. Cardoso and J. C. Lopes,Penrose process, superradiance, and ergoregion instabilities,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 084032, [1803.08060]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [26]

    black hole

    A. A. Starobinskii,Amplification of waves during reflection from a rotating “black hole”,Sov. Phys. JETP37(1973) 28–32

    1973

  26. [27]

    Detweiler,Klein-gordon equation and rotating black holes,Phys

    S. Detweiler,Klein-gordon equation and rotating black holes,Phys. Rev. D22(Nov, 1980) 2323–2326

    1980

  27. [28]

    R. A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko and A. F. Zinhailo,Higher order WKB formula for quasinormal modes and grey-body factors: recipes for quick and accurate calculations,Class. Quant. Grav. 36(2019) 155002, [1904.10333]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  28. [29]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko,Analytic expressions for quasinormal modes and grey-body factors in the eikonal limit and beyond,Class. Quant. Grav.40(2023) 245005, [2309.02560]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  29. [30]

    Suzuki, E

    H. Suzuki, E. Takasugi and H. Umetsu,Perturbations of Kerr-de Sitter black hole and Heun ’s equations,Prog. Theor. Phys.100(1998) 491–505, [gr-qc/9805064]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  30. [32]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko,Correspondence between grey-body factors and quasinormal frequencies for rotating black holes,Phys. Lett. B861(2025) 139288, [2408.11162]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [33]

    Arvanitaki, M

    A. Arvanitaki, M. Baryakhtar and X. Huang,Discovering the QCD Axion with Black Holes and Gravitational Waves,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 084011, [1411.2263]. – 18 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [34]

    Baumann, G

    D. Baumann, G. Bertone, J. Stout and G. M. Tomaselli,Ionization of gravitational atoms, Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 115036, [2112.14777]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  33. [35]

    H. S. Vieira and K. D. Kokkotas,Quasibound states of Schwarzschild acoustic black holes,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 024035, [2104.03938]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  34. [36]

    H. S. Vieira, V. B. Bezerra and C. R. Muniz,Instability of the charged massive scalar field on the Kerr–Newman black hole spacetime,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 932, [2107.02562]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  35. [37]

    W. H. Press and S. A. Teukolsky,Floating orbits, superradiant scattering and the black-hole bomb,Nature238(1972) 211–212

    1972

  36. [38]

    S. R. Dolan,Instability of the massive Klein-Gordon field on the Kerr spacetime,Phys. Rev. D 76(2007) 084001, [0705.2880]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  37. [39]

    W. E. East and F. Pretorius,Superradiant Instability and Backreaction of Massive Vector Fields around Kerr Black Holes,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 041101, [1704.04791]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [40]

    Arvanitaki and S

    A. Arvanitaki and S. Dubovsky,Exploring the String Axiverse with Precision Black Hole Physics,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 044026, [1004.3558]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  39. [41]

    Yoshino and H

    H. Yoshino and H. Kodama,Bosenova collapse of axion cloud around a rotating black hole, Prog. Theor. Phys.128(2012) 153–190, [1203.5070]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  40. [42]

    Baryakhtar, M

    M. Baryakhtar, M. Galanis, R. Lasenby and O. Simon,Black hole superradiance of self-interacting scalar fields,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 095019, [2011.11646]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  41. [43]

    Xie and F

    N. Xie and F. P. Huang,Self-interaction effects on the Kerr black hole superradiance and their observational implications,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 055028, [2503.10347]

    arXiv 2025

  42. [44]

    Y. S. Myung,Conditions for superradiant instability of the Kerr-Newman black holes,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 124015, [2204.06750]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  43. [45]

    Furuhashi and Y

    H. Furuhashi and Y. Nambu,Instability of massive scalar fields in Kerr-Newman space-time, Prog. Theor. Phys.112(2004) 983–995, [gr-qc/0402037]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  44. [46]

    Adamo and E

    T. Adamo and E. T. Newman,The Kerr-Newman metric: A Review,Scholarpedia9(2014) 31791, [1410.6626]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  45. [47]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso and M. Casals,Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of spin-weighted spheroidal harmonics in four and higher dimensions,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 024013, [gr-qc/0511111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  46. [48]

    Moncrief,Stability of Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black holes,Phys

    V. Moncrief,Stability of Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black holes,Phys. Rev. D10(1974) 1057–1059

    1974

  47. [49]

    Hod,No-bomb theorem for charged Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black holes,Phys Lett B718(2013) 1489–1492, [1304.6474]

    S. Hod,No-bomb theorem for charged Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black holes,Phys Lett B718(2013) 1489–1492, [1304.6474]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  48. [50]

    Hod,Stability of highly-charged Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black holes to charged scalar perturbations,Phys

    S. Hod,Stability of highly-charged Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black holes to charged scalar perturbations,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 044047, [1504.00009]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  49. [51]

    Huang, D.-J

    Y. Huang, D.-J. Liu, X.-h. Zhai and X.-z. Li,Instability for massive scalar fields in Kerr-Newman spacetime,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 025021, [1807.06263]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [52]

    Bao, Q.-X

    S.-S. Bao, Q.-X. Xu and H. Zhang,Next-to-leading-order solution to Kerr-Newman black hole superradiance,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 064037, [2301.05317]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  51. [53]

    Pere˜ niguez, M

    D. Pere˜ niguez, M. de Amicis, R. Brito and R. Panosso Macedo,Superradiant Instability of Magnetic Black Holes,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 104001, [2402.05178]. – 19 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024