Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Gravitational Wave Generation and Detection in Gravitational Quantum Field Theory

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In GQFT, the antisymmetric part of the stress-energy tensor radiates scalar and vector gravitational waves with $1/\gamma_W$-enhanced couplings, and the vector modes produce no detectable tidal force.

desk verdict Real new results in GQFT GW generation, with a factor-of-two bug in the scalar Φ formula and an unquantified detectability claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.21225 v1 pith:RSZYYTAJ submitted 2025-06-26 gr-qc hep-phhep-th

Yuan-Kun Gao , Da Huang , Yue-Liang Wu This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-phhep-th MSC 83C35
keywords gravitationalwavesquantumfieldtheoryGQFTscalarpolarizationvectorantisymmetricenergy-momentumtensorspindensitygeodesicdeviation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper works out how gravitational waves are produced and detected in Gravitational Quantum Field Theory (GQFT), a gauge-theory framework that adds scalar and vector graviton polarizations to the two tensor polarizations of general relativity. It claims that the symmetric part of the energy-momentum tensor radiates tensor and scalar waves through the traceless and trace parts of the quadrupole moment, while the antisymmetric part radiates scalar and vector waves with couplings set by the small parameter $\gamma_W$ and therefore enhanced relative to ordinary tensor radiation. It further claims that vector waves give a vanishing Riemann component $R_{i00j}$, so test masses undergo no relative acceleration and current laser interferometers cannot detect them, whereas scalar breathing waves and tensor waves should be observable. Two worked examples illustrate the new channels: a black hole binary on a slightly elliptical orbit produces scalar waves from the time-varying trace of its quadrupole moment, and a neutron star binary with one spin aligned to its velocity produces vector waves from the time variation of total spin. If these predictions hold, GQFT is observationally distinguishable from general relativity by new polarization channels, at least one of which would need a detector beyond laser interferometry.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the decomposition of the linearized gravigauge field and of the energy-momentum tensor into spin-2, spin-1, and spin-0 components, together with the split of the gravitational field equations into symmetric and antisymmetric parts. The key novelty is the antisymmetric energy-momentum tensor $T_{[\mu\nu]}$: its longitudinal part sources scalar waves through $\tilde S=\int d^3y\, y^i T_{[0i]}$, and its transverse part, related to spin density by $u_i=-\tfrac12\epsilon_{ijk}\partial^j\Xi^k$, sources vector waves. The small kinetic parameter $\gamma_W$ controls the enhancement, with the antisymmetric-source couplings appearing as $G_N(1+\gamma_W)/(\gamma_W(1-\gamma_W))\approx 1/(8\pi m_G^2)$, roughly $1/\gamma_W$ times the symmetric couplings. For detection, the load-bearing identity is the source-free vector relation $S_i=\partial_t F_i$, which makes the Riemann component $R_{i00j}=-\partial_t\partial_{(i}[S-\partial_t F]_{j)}$ vanish and thereby kills the vector signal in geodesic-deviation experiments.

What would settle it

Recompute $R_{i00j}$ for a source-free vector wave without imposing $S_i=\partial_t F_i$; if a propagating solution with nonvanishing $R_{i00j}$ exists, the vector-invisibility claim collapses. Observationally, a null search for the scalar breathing-mode waveform $\psi\sim(\gamma_W/(1-\gamma_W))(2G_N M/3r)(a\Omega)^2 e\cos(\Omega t_r)$ from eccentric compact binaries would directly constrain $\gamma_W$, while detection of a vector-type tidal response in a laser interferometer would falsify the prediction from the opposite direction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In its own terms, the paper establishes that the linearized GQFT equations, sourced by both a symmetric and an antisymmetric energy-momentum tensor, decouple into scalar, vector, and tensor sectors that can be solved analytically. The scalar field $\psi$ is radiated by the trace $I^k_k$ of the quadrupole moment and by an antisymmetric-source quantity $\tilde S$ built from $T_{[0i]}$; the field $\Phi$ carries the same sources with the antisymmetric contribution enhanced by roughly $1/\gamma_W$. Vector waves are sourced exclusively by the transverse part of the antisymmetric stress tensor, whose nonrelativistic limit is the time derivative of the fermionic spin density, so the leading vector radiation is proportional to $dU^k/dt_r$, where $U^k$ is minus the total spin, with a static $1/r^2$ term carrying the conserved angular momentum. Tensor waves come from the traceless quadrupole moment with only a prefactor modification relative to general relativity. The paper then uses the geodesic deviation equation to study detection and finds that, under the source-free relation $S_i=\partial_t F_i$, the vector mode gives $R_{i00j}=0$, making vector waves invisible to laser interferometers, while the scalar breathing mode and the tensor modes produce measurable tidal accelerations.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the linearized GQFT field equations and the source-free relation $S_i=\partial_t F_i$, taken from the companion linear-dynamics paper, remain valid for radiated waves; if that relation fails, the vanishing of $R_{i00j}$ and the claimed invisibility of vector modes fail with it, and the framework must also be free of ghost or strong-coupling pathologies at the scale where $\gamma_W$ is treated as a small linear coefficient.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Scalar and vector radiation sourced by the antisymmetric stress tensor is amplified by roughly $1/\gamma_W$ relative to tensor quadrupole radiation, so the new polarizations can be significant even though $\gamma_W$ is constrained to be very small.
  • An elliptical compact-object binary, with a time-varying trace of its quadrupole moment, emits scalar breathing waves at the orbital frequency without needing any antisymmetric source.
  • A neutron star binary with one component's net spin locked to its velocity emits vector waves whose leading amplitude is set by the time variation of fermionic spin, not by the mass quadrupole.
  • Vector gravitational waves produce zero geodesic deviation in laser interferometers, so scalar and tensor modes are the only GQFT polarizations that current and near-future interferometers can access.
  • The tensor waveform in GQFT differs from general relativity only by the prefactor $(1-\gamma_W/2)/(1-\gamma_W)$, which is below current sensitivity, so tensor observations test GQFT mainly through the presence of the new scalar and vector channels.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If $\gamma_W$ is as small as solar-system tests suggest, the $1/\gamma_W$ enhancement makes the scalar and vector channels the strongest new signals, and a targeted search for the predicted scalar breathing-wave waveform from eccentric binaries in existing interferometer data could set an independent bound on $\gamma_W$.
  • The authors only gesture at alternative detection strategies; a concrete follow-up would be to compute the force that GQFT vector modes exert on fermionic spins in a test mass and compare it with searches for ultralight vector dark matter.
  • Because the tensor waveform is identical in shape to general relativity's, the cleanest observational test is polarization counting rather than waveform matching: look for scalar or vector channels with their $\gamma_W$-enhanced amplitudes.
  • If vector modes are indeed invisible to interferometers, stochastic-background and detector-response analyses that assume every polarization enters through a nonzero Riemann tensor would need to be reformulated for GQFT.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives, within the linearized GQFT framework of Ref. [24], closed-form far-zone expressions for scalar, vector, and tensor gravitational waves sourced by the symmetric and antisymmetric parts of the matter energy-momentum tensor. It presents two astrophysical illustrations (a slightly eccentric equal-mass compact binary for scalar radiation and a neutron-star binary with one spin-velocity aligned component for vector radiation), derives the tensor quadrupole formula with a GQFT prefactor, and analyzes laser-interferometer response through the geodesic-deviation Riemann tensor. The paper concludes that scalar and tensor modes are observable by current instruments while vector modes produce zero Riemann signal. Appendices A-C supply the non-relativistic spin-density mapping, the longitudinal antisymmetric source in a spin-gauge-field background, and long-wavelength proofs of consistency conditions.

Significance. If the GQFT framework is accepted, the generation formulas are new consequences rather than fitted results: the derivation has no free parameters beyond the GQFT inputs gamma_W and m_G, and the appendix proofs make the retarded-time manipulations checkable. The tensor prefactor, the scalar breathing strain, and the vector-mode null Riemann response are concrete and falsifiable predictions. I checked the stress-test concern about the vector sector: the radiative O(1/r) parts of Eqs. (93) and (94) do satisfy S_i = d_t F_i, so the zero-Riemann argument in Sec. IV B is internally consistent. However, the scalar-sector inconsistency in Eq. (51) and the absence of a quantitative sensitivity comparison prevent the current version from supporting its central claims. The paper is valuable as a template for distinguishing GQFT from GR and Brans-Dicke theories, but it needs a major revision before the claims can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III A, Eqs. (40), (50), (51)] As printed, Eq. (51) is not the solution of the constraint Eq. (40). Substituting Eqs. (50) and (51) into 2*psi + gamma_W*Phi leaves the time-dependent remainder (GN/((1-gamma_W) r)) [(gamma_W/6) d^2 I^k_k/dt^2 - (2/3)(1+gamma_W) dS_tilde/dt], whereas Eq. (40) is time-independent. Solving Eq. (40) with Eq. (50) gives Phi_var = -GN/(3(1-gamma_W) r) d^2 I^k_k/dt^2 + 4 GN (1+gamma_W)/(3 gamma_W (1-gamma_W) r) dS_tilde/dt, so the bracket in Eq. (51) should be (1/3) d^2 I^k_k/dt^2 - 4(1+gamma_W)/(3 gamma_W) dS_tilde/dt rather than (1/6) d^2 I^k_k/dt^2 - 2(1+gamma_W)/(3 gamma_W) dS_tilde/dt. The antisymmetric-source contribution to the general scalar waveform is therefore underestimated by a factor of two, and the symmetric-source coefficient is also incorrect. The illustrative Eq. (72), which has S_tilde = 0, is not affected, but the general scalar waveform and the quantitative 'enhanced coupling' statement in the abstract and around Eq. (52) need correction.
  2. [Sec. IV and Abstract] The statement that current observatories 'can detect both scalar and tensor modes' is not supported by a strain-versus-sensitivity comparison. The only quantitative scalar example, Eq. (72), gives an amplitude proportional to (gamma_W/(1-gamma_W)) (2 GN M/(3 r)) (a Omega)^2 e; with the quoted bound gamma_W <~ 1e-4 or 1e-5 and a binary orbital frequency far below the LIGO/Virgo band, this is plausibly many orders of magnitude below current detector noise. No sensitivity curve, signal-to-noise estimate, or event-rate calculation is provided for either the scalar or the tensor mode. The detectability conclusion should either be supported by such a comparison or be qualified as a statement about which polarizations produce a nonzero detector response rather than about actual observability.
  3. [Secs. III A and III B, Eqs. (50)-(51), (83)-(95)] The central physical claim is that antisymmetric-source scalar and vector amplitudes are enhanced by 1/gamma_W (equivalently 1/m_G^2). The paper never checks that the linearized expansion remains under control in this regime: for gamma_W <~ 1e-5 the enhanced terms can be large even for modest source parameters, and there is no estimate of the radiated energy flux or of the GQFT effective-field-theory cutoff that would justify treating Eqs. (14)-(18) as linear with a small dimensionless coupling. A concrete check would be to compute the scalar and vector energy fluxes from the derived solutions and compare them with the orbital energy budget of the binary examples; if those fluxes are not small, the amplitudes in Eqs. (50), (51), and (93) cannot be used as quantitative predictions.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II, after Eq. (10)] The metric signature is printed as diag(-1.1,1,1); it should presumably be diag(-1,1,1,1).
  2. [Sec. III A, Eq. (47)] The displayed first equality, -d/dt integral (1/3) partial_j y^j (b+s) = (1/3) d/dt integral y^j partial_j (b+s), is not correct as written: for localized functions the left-hand side vanishes identically. The calculation should start from -d/dt integral (b+s), using integral (b+s) = -(1/3) integral y^j partial_j (b+s). The final result is unaffected, but the intermediate step is confusing.
  3. [Sec. III B and Fig. 2] The sign conventions relating the spin density Xi^k, the quantity U^k, and the star's 'total spin' are easy to confuse; please state explicitly that U^k = - integral Xi^k and specify which object is meant by the spin amplitude U_0 in Eq. (98).
  4. [Sec. IV B, Eq. (120)] The sentence 'where we have used the relation S_i = d_t F_i for a vector GW without sources' relies on the source-free limit of the equations derived in Sec. III B; since the radiative O(1/r) parts of Eqs. (93) and (94) indeed satisfy this relation, the argument is sound, but it would be helpful to state this check explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

GW generation formulas are solved from the theory's field equations; no fitted parameter or self-citation is masquerading as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's GW-generation formulas, Eqs. (50)-(51), (93)-(94), and (109), are obtained by solving the linearized GQFT field equations (14)-(18) with the source decompositions (12)-(13). The source moments I^k_k, S-tilde, U^k, and L^k are independent matter integrals; they are not chosen to reproduce the waveforms. The parameters gamma_W and m_G enter as pre-existing couplings bounded by external Solar System tests, with no parameter fitted to the GW predictions. The 1/gamma_W enhancement factors follow algebraically from the coefficient structure of Eqs. (17), (73), and (83), rather than being inserted by definition of the source. The vector-undetectability argument uses the relation S_i = d_t F_i, cited from Ref. [24]; this is not an opaque self-citation because the paper's own radiative solutions satisfy it: inserting Eqs. (93) and (94) gives d_t F_i equal to the O(1/r) part of S_i, so the vanishing Riemann result in Eq. (120) is internally consistent. The self-citations to Refs. [12-15, 24, 25] define the GQFT framework and its linearized dynamics; they do not assume the target detection or radiation conclusions. The algebraic inconsistency between Eq. (51) and Eq. (40) identified in the skeptical reading is a correctness concern, not a circularity, because it does not reduce a prediction to an input or to a fitted parameter. Overall, the derivation is self-contained given the stated framework, so no significant circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central derivation rests on GQFT field equations and source definitions imported from earlier papers by the same group, together with standard perturbation theory. The only numerical inputs are the externally bounded parameter gamma_W and the derived scale m_G; the examples use chosen source parameters (eccentricity, spin amplitude) that do not affect the theoretical formulas. No new entity is introduced in this paper; the spin gauge field comes from prior GQFT work and lacks independent experimental evidence.

free parameters (2)
  • gamma_W = bounded by solar system tests, gamma_W < O(10^-5) in Sec. III and gamma_W < O(10^-4) in Sec. III C
    Controls the kinetic coefficients in Eqs. (14)-(18) and appears in all scalar and vector GW amplitudes via 1/gamma_W enhancement. It is constrained externally, not fitted in this paper.
  • m_G = m_G <= 10^16 GeV
    Typical mass scale of the spin gauge fields; arises in the effective coupling 1/(8 pi m_G^2) for antisymmetric sources. Derived from the gamma_W bound via Eq. (52).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption GQFT linearized field equations with symmetric and antisymmetric decomposition (Eqs. 9, 14-18)
    Taken from Ref. [24]; these equations define the gravitational dynamics from which all GW generation formulas are derived.
  • domain assumption Relation between G_N and eG_N (Eq. 10)
    Imported from Ref. [24] to express final results in terms of the measured Newton constant; used in Eqs. (50), (93), and (109).
  • domain assumption Antisymmetric EM tensor for fermions (Eq. 54, Appendix B)
    Defines T_[mu nu] in GQFT; the claim that only the background spin gauge field yields nonzero d^i T_[0i] rests on this definition and the fermion equations of motion.
  • domain assumption Massive spin gauge field A_mu^ab as the only source of d^i T_[0i] != 0
    Appendix B shows conventional gauge fields give zero contribution; the scalar GW source eS relies on the spin gauge field background.
  • domain assumption S_i = d_t F_i for free vector waves
    Used in Sec. IV B to set R_i00j = 0; imported from Ref. [24]. The undetectability of vector modes hinges on this relation.
  • standard math Far-field and long-wavelength expansions
    Standard multipole expansion applied to retarded integrals; used throughout Sec. III and proved for the needed cases in Appendix C.
invented entities (1)
  • Spin gauge field A_mu^ab
    purpose: Background field that produces nonzero longitudinal component of T_[0i], sourcing scalar GWs (Eq. 55).
    Introduced in earlier GQFT publications; no direct experimental evidence is presented. It is load-bearing for the scalar-source mechanism but has no falsifiable handle outside the theory as given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gravitational Wave Generation and Detection in Gravitational Quantum Field Theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RSZYYTAJ

@misc{pith2026250621225,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gravitational Wave Generation and Detection in Gravitational Quantum Field Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RSZYYTAJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.21225}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the production and detection of gravitational waves (GWs) within the framework of Gravitational Quantum Field Theory (GQFT). In this theory, GWs exhibit five propagating modes: one scalar, two vector, and two tensor modes. Unlike General Relativity, the gravitational field equations in GQFT involve both symmetric and antisymmetric tensors, governed by their respective energy-momentum tensors, both of which can act as sources for GW radiation. By solving the linearized gravitational equations, we derive general analytic expressions for the different GW degrees of freedom. Our analysis reveals that the symmetric energy-momentum tensor generates scalar and tensor GWs through the trace and traceless parts of the quadrupole moment, respectively. In contrast, the antisymmetric stress tensor induces scalar and vector GWs with enhanced coupling strengths. We examine two illustrative examples: a black hole binary with a slightly elliptical orbit, which produces scalar GWs, and a neutron star binary where one component has a net spin aligned with its velocity, leading to vector GW emission. Finally, we study the detectability of these GW polarizations by analyzing their signatures in GW detectors. Our findings indicate that current observatories can detect both scalar and tensor modes, while a newly designed detector would be required to probe vector GWs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.21225 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. An illustration of the binary system with an elliptical orbit, which can generate scalar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. An illustration of a NS binary in which the spin of one star changes with its velocity. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quasi-bound states and late-time evolution of a massive fermion around a Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m black hole

    gr-qc 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Matrix matching yields improved quasi-bound spectra (fine structure + decay widths) for a massive Dirac field on RN, and branch-cut analysis plus simulations reveal an intermediate oscillatory power law followed by a ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [24]

    Y.-j. Chen, P. Xu, and Y.-l. Wu, Post-newtonian tests of gravitational quantum field theory with spin and scaling gauge symmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 228 (2025), arXiv:2407.09410 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  2. [1]

    Compact Object Binary with an Orbit of Small Ellipticity In the GQFT, in the absence of eSfrom the anti-symmetric EM tensor, the dominant source to the scalar GW mode is the second-order differentiation ofI k k with respect to the retarded timet r. However, in the conventional binary system composed of compact objects, the orbit of each component is usual...

    work page

  3. [2]

    (43) M= Z V d3y ρ+∂ ˜tr(b−s) (˜tr,y),(C1) which is crucial to show the consistency in the derivation of the scalar GW radiation formulae

    Relations for Scalar Fields We shall firstly focus on the scalar field relation in Eq. (43) M= Z V d3y ρ+∂ ˜tr(b−s) (˜tr,y),(C1) which is crucial to show the consistency in the derivation of the scalar GW radiation formulae. Note that all fields in the volume integrand are functions of retarded time ˜tr =t− |r−y| ≃t r + ˆk·y, which gives extraydependence ...

    work page

  4. [3]

    (82), which are reproduced here Z V d3y(vi −∂ ˜trθi)(˜tr,y) = 0,(C7) and ˆkj Z V d3yy j(vi −∂ tθi)≃ −1 2 ϵijk ˆkjLk .(C8) Note that the time variable of the integrand in Eq

    Relations for V ector Fields We would like to provide explicit proofs for two consistency relations in Eq. (82), which are reproduced here Z V d3y(vi −∂ ˜trθi)(˜tr,y) = 0,(C7) and ˆkj Z V d3yy j(vi −∂ tθi)≃ −1 2 ϵijk ˆkjLk .(C8) Note that the time variable of the integrand in Eq. (C7) is the retarded time ˜tr =t− |x−y| which introduces an extraydependence...

    work page

  5. [4]

    C. M. Will, The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment, Living Rev. Rel. 17, 4 (2014), arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2014

  6. [5]

    C. M. Will,Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    2018

  7. [6]

    J. F. Donoghue, Quantum General Relativity and Effective Field Theory (2023) arXiv:2211.09902 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  8. [7]

    M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and E. Witten,SUPERSTRING THEORY. VOL. 1: INTRO- DUCTION, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (1988)

    work page 1988

Show all 56 references
  1. [8]

    M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and E. Witten,SUPERSTRING THEORY. VOL. 2: LOOP AMPLITUDES, ANOMALIES AND PHENOMENOLOGY(1988)

    1988

  2. [9]

    Polchinski,String theory

    J. Polchinski,String theory. Vol. 2: Superstring theory and beyond, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    2007

  3. [10]

    Rovelli, Loop quantum gravity, Living Rev

    C. Rovelli, Loop quantum gravity, Living Rev. Rel.11, 5 (2008)

    2008

  4. [11]

    Ashtekar and E

    A. Ashtekar and E. Bianchi, A short review of loop quantum gravity, Rept. Prog. Phys.84, 042001 (2021), arXiv:2104.04394 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Horava, Quantum Gravity at a Lifshitz Point, Phys

    P. Horava, Quantum Gravity at a Lifshitz Point, Phys. Rev. D79, 084008 (2009), arXiv:0901.3775 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  6. [13]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  7. [14]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Tests of general relativity with GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 221101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129902 (2018)], arXiv:1602.03841 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Wu, Quantum field theory of gravity with spin and scaling gauge invariance and space- 42 time dynamics with quantum inflation, Phys

    Y.-L. Wu, Quantum field theory of gravity with spin and scaling gauge invariance and space- 42 time dynamics with quantum inflation, Phys. Rev. D93, 024012 (2016), arXiv:1506.01807 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Wu, Gravidynamics, spinodynamics and electrodynamics within the framework of gravitational quantum field theory, Sci

    Y.-L. Wu, Gravidynamics, spinodynamics and electrodynamics within the framework of gravitational quantum field theory, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.66, 260411 (2023), arXiv:2208.03290 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Wu, A general theory of the standard model and the revelation of the dark side of the universe, Sci

    Y.-L. Wu, A general theory of the standard model and the revelation of the dark side of the universe, Sci. Bull.70, 1740 (2025), arXiv:2502.19458 [physics.gen-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Wu, Gravitization Equation and Zero Energy Momentum Tensor Theorem with Can- cellation Law in Gravitational Quantum Field Theory, (2024), to be published in Phys

    Y.-L. Wu, Gravitization Equation and Zero Energy Momentum Tensor Theorem with Can- cellation Law in Gravitational Quantum Field Theory, (2024), to be published in Phys. Lett. B (2025), arXiv:2411.15166 [physics.gen-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [19]

    F. W. Hehl, P. Von Der Heyde, G. D. Kerlick, and J. M. Nester, General Relativity with Spin and Torsion: Foundations and Prospects, Rev. Mod. Phys.48, 393 (1976)

    1976

  13. [20]

    Ivanenko and G

    D. Ivanenko and G. Sardanashvily, The Gauge Treatment of Gravity, Phys. Rept.94, 1 (1983)

    1983

  14. [21]

    F. W. Hehl, J. D. McCrea, E. W. Mielke, and Y. Ne’eman, Metric affine gauge theory of gravity: Field equations, Noether identities, world spinors, and breaking of dilation invariance, Phys. Rept.258, 1 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9402012

    1995 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Wu,Foundations of the Hyperunified Field Theory(World Scientific, 2022)

    Y.-L. Wu,Foundations of the Hyperunified Field Theory(World Scientific, 2022)

    2022

  16. [23]

    Gao and W.-T

    D. Gao and W.-T. Ni, Frame-dragging effects in a gravitational quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D111, 084039 (2025), arXiv:2411.04460 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Q.-Y. Wang, Y. Tang, and Y.-L. Wu, Inflation in Weyl scaling invariant gravity with R3 extensions, Phys. Rev. D107, 083511 (2023), arXiv:2301.03744 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Huang, Y

    D. Huang, Y. Tang, and Y.-L. Wu, Contributions to the muon g−2 from a three-form field, JHEP01, 117, arXiv:2208.07108 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    Y.-K. Gao, D. Huang, Y.-L. Ma, Y. Tang, Y.-L. Wu, and Y.-F. Zhou, Linear dynamics and classical tests of the gravitational quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D109, 064072 (2024), arXiv:2403.17619 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Xu, H.-B

    C. Xu, H.-B. Jin, and Y.-L. Wu, Detector Response to Gravitational Wave Polarizations in Gravitational Quantum Field Theory, (2025), arXiv:2504.01809 [gr-qc]. 43

    2025 arXiv

  21. [29]

    S. M. Carroll,Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity(Cambridge University Press, 2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    Bertschinger, Cosmological dynamics: Course 1, inLes Houches Summer School on Cos- mology and Large Scale Structure (Session 60)(1993) pp

    E. Bertschinger, Cosmological dynamics: Course 1, inLes Houches Summer School on Cos- mology and Large Scale Structure (Session 60)(1993) pp. 273–348, arXiv:astro-ph/9503125

    1993 arXiv

  23. [31]

    V. F. Mukhanov, H. A. Feldman, and R. H. Brandenberger, Theory of cosmological pertur- bations. Part 1. Classical perturbations. Part 2. Quantum theory of perturbations. Part 3. Extensions, Phys. Rept.215, 203 (1992)

    1992

  24. [32]

    Nojiri, S

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou, and A. A. Popov, Propagation of gravita- tional waves in Chern–Simons axionF(R) gravity, Phys. Dark Univ.28, 100514 (2020), arXiv:2002.10402 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  25. [33]

    C. M. Will, Gravitational Radiation from Binary Systems in Alternative Metric Theories of Gravity: Dipole Radiation and the Binary Pulsar, Astrophys. J.214, 826 (1977)

    1977

  26. [34]

    C. M. Will,Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics(1993)

    1993

  27. [35]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler,Gravitation(W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973)

    1973

  28. [36]

    Brans and R

    C. Brans and R. H. Dicke, Mach’s principle and a relativistic theory of gravitation, Phys. Rev. 124, 925 (1961)

    1961

  29. [37]

    Maggiore,Gravitational Waves

    M. Maggiore,Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments(Oxford University Press, 2007)

    2007

  30. [38]

    D. M. Eardley, D. L. Lee, A. P. Lightman, R. V. Wagoner, and C. M. Will, Gravitational-wave observations as a tool for testing relativistic gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.30, 884 (1973)

    1973

  31. [39]

    Nishizawa, A

    A. Nishizawa, A. Taruya, K. Hayama, S. Kawamura, and M.-a. Sakagami, Probing non- tensorial polarizations of stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds with ground-based laser interferometers, Phys. Rev. D79, 082002 (2009), arXiv:0903.0528 [astro-ph.CO]

    2009 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Advanced LIGO, Class

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Advanced LIGO, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Acerneseet al.(VIRGO), Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravita- tional wave detector, Class

    F. Acerneseet al.(VIRGO), Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravita- tional wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Somiya (KAGRA), Detector configuration of KAGRA: The Japanese cryogenic gravitational-wave detector, Class

    K. Somiya (KAGRA), Detector configuration of KAGRA: The Japanese cryogenic gravitational-wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav.29, 124007 (2012), arXiv:1111.7185 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Y. Aso, Y. Michimura, K. Somiya, M. Ando, O. Miyakawa, T. Sekiguchi, D. Tatsumi, and 44 H. Yamamoto (KAGRA), Interferometer design of the KAGRA gravitational wave detector, Phys. Rev. D88, 043007 (2013), arXiv:1306.6747 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Amaro-Seoaneet al.(LISA), Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

    P. Amaro-Seoaneet al.(LISA), Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

    2017 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Hu and Y.-L

    W.-R. Hu and Y.-L. Wu, The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity, Natl. Sci. Rev.4, 685 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    Luoet al.(TianQin), TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector, Class

    J. Luoet al.(TianQin), TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 035010 (2016), arXiv:1512.02076 [astro-ph.IM]

    2016 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Michimura, T

    Y. Michimura, T. Fujita, S. Morisaki, H. Nakatsuka, and I. Obata, Ultralight vector dark matter search with auxiliary length channels of gravitational wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 102, 102001 (2020), arXiv:2008.02482 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Morisaki, T

    S. Morisaki, T. Fujita, Y. Michimura, H. Nakatsuka, and I. Obata, Improved sensitivity of interferometric gravitational wave detectors to ultralight vector dark matter from the finite light-traveling time, Phys. Rev. D103, L051702 (2021), arXiv:2011.03589 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, KAGRA, Virgo), Constraints on dark photon dark matter using data from LIGO’s and Virgo’s third observing run, Phys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, KAGRA, Virgo), Constraints on dark photon dark matter using data from LIGO’s and Virgo’s third observing run, Phys. Rev. D105, 063030 (2022), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 109, 089902 (2024)], arXiv:2105.13085 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  42. [50]

    A. G. Abacet al.(KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), Ultralight vector dark matter search using data from the KAGRA O3GK run, Phys. Rev. D110, 042001 (2024), arXiv:2403.03004 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    A. L. Miller and L. Mendes, First search for ultralight dark matter with a space- based gravitational-wave antenna: LISA Pathfinder, Phys. Rev. D107, 063015 (2023), arXiv:2301.08736 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Frerick, J

    J. Frerick, J. Jaeckel, F. Kahlhoefer, and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Riding the dark matter wave: Novel limits on general dark photons from LISA Pathfinder, Phys. Lett. B848, 138328 (2024), arXiv:2310.06017 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Cirelli, E

    M. Cirelli, E. Del Nobile, and P. Panci, Tools for model-independent bounds in direct dark matter searches, JCAP10, 019, arXiv:1307.5955 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  46. [54]

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder,An Introduction to quantum field theory(Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995)

    1995

  47. [55]

    A. L. Fitzpatrick, W. Haxton, E. Katz, N. Lubbers, and Y. Xu, The Effective Field Theory 45 of Dark Matter Direct Detection, JCAP02, 004, arXiv:1203.3542 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    E. P. Wigner, On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium, Phys. Rev.40, 749 (1932). 46

    1932

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.