Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 77 references

Aspects of Carrollian field theory from holography

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper derives the holographic stress tensor of three-dimensional flat-space gravity at null infinity and shows that its anomalous BMS3 transformation fixes the Carrollian central charges c_L = 0 and c_M = 3/G_N.

desk verdict A transparent, mostly solid holographic derivation of the known BMS3 central charges; the main loose end is the unresolved trace/Weyl-anomaly sector, but the core matching is checkable and deserves referee time. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12241 v1 pith:RWB34IP3 submitted 2026-08-12 hep-th gr-qc

Hare Krishna , Vaishnavi Patil This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords CarrollianfieldtheoryBMS3algebraflat-spaceholographynullinfinityquasilocalstresstensorcentralchargesBMSSchwarzianBondimassaspect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the boundary stress tensor of three-dimensional asymptotically flat Einstein gravity, computed holographically at future null infinity, is the energy-momentum tensor of a two-dimensional Carrollian (equivalently BMS) conformal field theory. Reading the anomalous transformation of this stress tensor under BMS3 transformations fixes the central charges to $c_L = 0$ and $c_M = 3/G_N$, the same values obtained by an ultrarelativistic contraction ($c\to 0$) of two Virasoro algebras each carrying the central charge $c = 3\ell/2G_N$. If right, this supplies a direct holographic derivation of the flat-space central charges that never passes through an AdS limit, and it turns the Bondi mass and angular momentum aspects into the energy and momentum densities of the boundary theory. The same construction yields flux-balance Ward identities and an on-shell boundary action for the flat-space graviton modes, the 'BMS Schwarzian'.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the mixed-index quasilocal stress tensor on a null boundary, $T^i{}_j = W^i{}_j - \delta^i{}_j W$, formed from the Weingarten map $W^i{}_j$ of a family of hypersurfaces pushed to $I^+$, with the normal tilted into the retarded-time direction, $n = dr - \frac{1}{2}M(\phi)\,du - \frac{1}{2}uM'(\phi)\,d\phi$, and the auxiliary rigging vector set to $k = -\partial_r$; stripping off the $1/r$ weight of the induced volume form defines the finite boundary tensor with leading components $T^u{}_u = -M/(16\pi G_N)$ and $T^\phi{}_u = -N/(8\pi G_N)$. The second ingredient is the transformation law of a Carrollian CFT stress tensor under finite BMS3 transformations, in which the homogeneous pieces carry conformal weight two and the anomalies appear as the Schwarzian $\{f,\phi\}$ with coefficient $c_M$ and the 'BMS Schwarzian' $S_{\mathrm{BMS}}[(f,g),\phi]$ with coefficient $c_L$. Reading off the $R'''(\phi)$ and $T'''(\phi)$ terms of the infinitesimal transformation fixes the two central charges.

What would settle it

Recompute the boundary stress tensor with a different admissible normal or auxiliary vector — the untilted co-normal $n = dr$, or another null rigging $k$ — and re-extract the Schwarzian coefficients from the transformed $T^u{}_u$ and $T^\phi{}_u$; if $c_L$ and $c_M$ shift, the charges are artifacts of the chosen foliation rather than intrinsic data of the dual theory. A second check the authors explicitly leave open: decide whether a local Carrollian Weyl anomaly accounts for the nonzero trace $T^u{}_u + T^\phi{}_\phi = -M(\phi)/(16\pi G_N)$, which a conformal Carrollian stress tensor should not possess.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the quasilocal stress tensor of three-dimensional asymptotically flat Einstein gravity at future null infinity — computed for the most general vacuum Bondi solution with mass aspect $M(\phi)$ and angular momentum aspect $N(\phi)$ — is, after the universal $1/r$ falloff is stripped, exactly the stress tensor of a two-dimensional conformal Carrollian field theory on $I^+ \simeq \mathbb{R}_u \times S^1_\phi$. The two nonvanishing components are $T^u{}_u = -M(\phi)/(16\pi G_N)$ and $T^\phi{}_u = -N(\phi)/(8\pi G_N)$, and the quasilocal charges built from them reproduce the Bondi mass and angular momentum. Under BMS3 transformations the tensor acquires inhomogeneous terms controlled by the ordinary Schwarzian $\{f,\phi\}$ and the companion 'BMS Schwarzian' $S_{\mathrm{BMS}}[(f,g),\phi]$; matching those terms against the Carrollian CFT transformation law fixes the central charges to $c_L = 0$ and $c_M = 3/G_N$. The paper attributes the vanishing $c_L$ to the parity invariance of pure Einstein gravity, which a gravitational Chern-Simons term would lift, and it further derives the flux-balance Ward identity for the stress-tensor correlators and the on-shell boundary action for the BMS Schwarzian modes, which in the Minkowski sector reduces to $(1/8\pi G_N)\int du\,d\phi\,\{\tan(f(\phi)/2),\phi\}$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands on the dictionary that identifies the tensor $T^i{}_j = W^i{}_j - \delta^i{}_j W$, built with the tilted normal $n = dr - \frac{1}{2}M\,du - \frac{1}{2}uM'\,d\phi$ and the rigging vector $k = -\partial_r$ and stripped of its $1/r$ falloff, as the stress tensor of the dual Carrollian CFT; if that dictionary were changed, the extracted central charges could change as well.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Quasilocal charges computed from the stress tensor reproduce the Bondi mass and angular momentum exactly, matching the ADM and covariant phase-space results.
  • The stress tensor is not conserved but obeys a flux-balance Ward identity: its projected divergence equals the matter flux out through $I^+$, which on-shell reduces to the Bondi mass-loss and angular-momentum-loss laws, with gravitational memory encoded in the integrated shifts of the supertranslation and superrotation densities.
  • The on-shell null-boundary action for the boundary graviton modes is the BMS Schwarzian theory; in the Minkowski sector it reads $(1/8\pi G_N)\int du\,d\phi\,\{\tan(f/2),\phi\}$, with phase space the vacuum coadjoint orbit BMS3/ISO(2,1) fibering over the cotangent bundle of Diff(S^1)/PSL(2,R).
  • The central charge $c_L$ vanishes because pure Einstein gravity is parity-invariant; adding a gravitational Chern-Simons term is expected to make it nonzero.
  • The holographically extracted values $c_L = 0$ and $c_M = 3/G_N$ agree with the ultrarelativistic contraction of two Virasoro algebras each carrying $c = 3\ell/2G_N$, so the paper reaches the same charges without taking any limit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The central-charge extraction may depend on the choice of foliation and rigging vector, since the paper's own formulas show the subleading stress-tensor components shift with the normal; comparing the extraction for another admissible normal is the cheapest test of whether the result is intrinsic to the dual theory.
  • The nonzero trace of the holographic stress tensor makes the Carrollian Weyl anomaly of this bulk theory a concrete target; computing it would either close the acknowledged gap or expose a genuine mismatch with conformal Carrollian dynamics.
  • The flux-balance Ward identity opens the possibility of computing stress-tensor correlators on $I^+$ semiclassically from the BMS Schwarzian action; the values $c_M = 3/G_N$ and $c_L = 0$ make definite predictions for the anomaly coefficients of two- and three-point functions that a direct holographic computation could verify.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a holographic quasilocal stress tensor for three-dimensional asymptotically flat spacetimes at null infinity, using a tilted normal and rigging vector adapted to the Bondi mass aspect. It then computes how this stress tensor transforms under BMS3 transformations, compares the anomalous terms with the known transformation law of a two-dimensional Carrollian conformal field theory, and extracts the central charges c_L=0 and c_M=3/G_N. The same framework is used to derive stress-tensor Ward identities with flux-balance corrections and to obtain a boundary action for BMS3 boundary gravitons, which reduces to a BMS Schwarzian theory for the Minkowski vacuum. Appendices review free Carrollian scalar theories, the flat-space contraction of AdS3/CFT2, the Carrollian connection, and Carrollian sources at null infinity.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides a direct holographic route to the BMS3 central charges from a bulk stress tensor, complementing algebraic derivations via the flat-space contraction of Brown-Henneaux and offering a concrete dictionary for flat-space holography. The explicit stress tensor components, the Brown-York charge computation matching the ADM/covariant-phase-space results, the Ward identities with flux-balance terms, and the BMS Schwarzian boundary action are all valuable and mostly well executed. The main claim, however, rests on two load-bearing points that need further work: the nonzero trace of the holographic stress tensor and the origin of the third-derivative terms in the Bondi-aspect transformation law. The paper is transparent about these gaps, but they prevent the central-charge extraction from being fully established as stated.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3 and Appendix D, Eqs. (2.22), (3.11), (3.13), (D.12)] The central-charge matching uses the Carrollian CFT transformation law (3.13), whose standard derivation assumes the conditions (3.11), in particular tracelessness T^u_u + T^φ_φ = 0. The holographic stress tensor computed in (2.22)-(2.23) has T^φ_φ = 0 and T^u_u = -M(φ)/(16πG_N), so its trace is -M(φ)/(16πG_N), which is nonzero for generic M(φ) and even for the constant Minkowski value M=-1. The paper states this limitation openly in Section 3 but does not resolve it. In addition, the Weyl Ward identity (D.12) in Appendix D, together with the statement that A_W vanishes on the Bondi frame (D.5), would force the trace to vanish in the absence of sources, in direct tension with the explicit stress tensor. Until this trace/Weyl-anomaly sector is understood, the identification of the R''' and T''' coefficients with c_L and c_M is not fully justified, since those coefficients could in principle mix with trace-dependent terms in the transformation law. Please either construct an improved traceless boundary stress tensor, or derive the transformation law without assuming tracelessness and show explicitly that the extracted central charges are unaffected.
  2. [Section 2.3, Eqs. (2.36)-(2.40)] The transformation of the Bondi aspects M and N under BMS3 is stated in (2.37) without derivation. Because (2.37) already contains the third-derivative central terms -2R''' and -T''', these terms propagate directly into the transformed stress tensor (2.40) and determine the central charges in the matching in Section 3. If (2.37) is imported from the known centrally extended BMS3 algebra, the extraction is circular rather than a derivation; if it is derived from the coordinate transformation (2.36), that derivation should be shown. Please provide the derivation of (2.37) from (2.36), or from the Lie derivative of the Bondi metric, and state the sign and normalization conventions used, so the reader can verify that the third-derivative terms are consequences of the bulk coordinate transformation rather than assumed inputs.
  3. [Section 3, after Eq. (3.23)] The paper asserts that 'the same values are obtained by starting from the general Bondi metric and comparing the transformation of the boundary stress tensor' without displaying the computation. For generic M(φ) and N(φ), the transformed stress tensor (2.40) contains additional M- and N-dependent terms, and the trace obstruction is more acute. Please include the explicit comparison for generic Bondi data, checking that the full CFT transformation law (3.13), including any possible trace or Weyl-anomaly contributions, reproduces the same values of c_L and c_M. This is necessary to support the claim that the matching is not restricted to the Minkowski vacuum.
  4. [Sections 2.2-2.3 and Appendix C] The quasilocal stress tensor (2.14) is constructed with a specific choice of tilted normal (2.18) and rigging vector k^a = -∂_r (2.21). The extracted central charges should be independent of this auxiliary data, but the paper does not demonstrate that invariance. Since a different foliation or rigging could change the components of T^i_j and hence the coefficients matched in Section 3, please either prove the invariance of the extracted charges under changes of this auxiliary structure or discuss the dependence explicitly, with a reference if this was established elsewhere.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Section 1] The abstract and the introduction write c_M = 3/G, while the body consistently uses 3/G_N; please unify the notation.
  2. [Section 2.3, Eq. (2.37)] The signs of the R''' and T''' terms in (2.37) differ across conventions in the BMS literature; please state explicitly which convention is used and cross-check the signs against the coordinate transformation (2.36).
  3. [Section 5, around Eq. (5.15)] In the line after (5.15), 'P = -1/(8πG)' should read 'P = -1/(8πG_N)' for consistency with the rest of the paper.
  4. [Appendix D, after Eq. (D.12)] The statement that the Weyl anomaly A_W vanishes on the frame (D.5) sits in tension with the earlier computed nonzero trace of the stress tensor; the appendix should include an explicit comment or forward reference acknowledging this open issue, so the reader is not left with an apparent contradiction.
  5. [Section 3, footnote 4] The footnote claims that the current rescaling converts anomalous coefficients c_{L,M}/12 into c_{L,M}/(24π); a one-line derivation of this conversion would avoid confusion about the factor of 1/2.
  6. [References] Reference [22] is an unpublished preprint by the same authors; if a published version exists, it should be cited, and any reliance on its definitions should be flagged at the point of use.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: central charges are compared, not fitted; the derivation is self-contained apart from one non-load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The central-charge extraction is a comparison, not a fit. The bulk stress tensor components (2.22) are computed directly from the Weingarten map with an explicit normal (2.18) and rigging (2.21), and their BMS transformation (2.40) follows from the Bondi-gauge transformation of the mass and angular momentum aspects (2.36)-(2.37). The anomalous R''' and T''' coefficients are then matched to the Carrollian CFT transformation law (3.13), yielding c_L=0 and c_M=3/G_N. The values are not inserted as inputs: the transformation law (3.13) is parameterized by the charges, and the bulk calculation fixes them. The only self-citation, [22], is one of three references [22,39,61] supporting the null-boundary stress-tensor formula, and the paper reproduces the computation explicitly; it is not load-bearing in the sense of a uniqueness theorem or an unverified ansatz. The paper openly flags a genuine correctness gap: the computed trace T^a_a ∝ M(φ) does not vanish, while the CFT transformation law quoted in Section 3 is derived under tracelessness, and the Weyl anomaly sector is left unresolved (Section 3 and Appendix D). This is an inconsistency that weakens the rigor of the matching, but it is not a circular reduction of the central charges to the paper's inputs. Under the stated rules, that concern belongs to correctness risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters and no invented entities. All numerical inputs are physical constants (G_N) or known central charges. The load-bearing content is borrowed from prior constructions: the null-boundary stress tensor from [22,39], the Carrollian anomalous transformation from [28], and the boundary action from [40,41]. The central charge extraction stands or falls with the dictionary assumption in axiom 2 and with the derivation status of the aspect transformations in axiom 3. The unresolved trace issue for nonzero M(φ) is an open loop in the claim that the stress tensor is a conformal Carrollian one.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Three-dimensional Einstein gravity in asymptotically flat Bondi gauge has a dual two-dimensional Carrollian conformal field theory.
    Abstract and Section 1 state the duality is conjectured; the paper tests consistency but does not prove it.
  • domain assumption The null-boundary quasilocal stress tensor T^i_j = W^i_j - δ^i_j W, computed with the chosen normal and rigging and stripped by 1/r, is the holographic stress tensor of the dual CCFT.
    Sections 2.2-2.3 and Appendix E, equations (2.14) and (2.42)-(2.43); the central charge extraction depends on this dictionary.
  • domain assumption The BMS3 transformation laws for M and N in (2.37), including the third-derivative terms, are obtained from the gauge-preserving action of (2.36) and are not imported from the centrally extended algebra.
    Section 2.3 states these transformations without derivation; if the third-derivative terms already encode the central charge, the comparison in Section 3 becomes partly circular.
  • domain assumption The anomalous transformation law of the Carrollian stress tensor (3.13), with c_L and c_M as coefficients, is the correct boundary transformation law.
    Section 3, equation (3.13), cited from the literature; it is the external benchmark against which the holographic stress tensor is matched.
  • domain assumption The generating functional W_AFS is invariant under boundary diffeomorphisms, and the matter flux through I+ is given by F_out^j in (4.11).
    Section 4 uses these to derive the Ward identity and flux-balance laws; the details of F_out are deferred to reference [41].
  • domain assumption The coadjoint orbit action for the BMS3 vacuum, including the Schwarzian transformation of the mass aspect, is the correct boundary graviton phase space.
    Section 5 uses (5.12)-(5.17) to write the BMS Schwarzian action; the formulas are taken from [40,41,73].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Aspects of Carrollian field theory from holography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RWB34IP3

@misc{pith2026260812241,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Aspects of Carrollian field theory from holography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RWB34IP3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12241}
}
abstract

We study holography for three-dimensional asymptotically flat spacetimes in which the bulk gravitational dynamics is conjectured to be dual to a two-dimensional Carrollian (equivalently BMS) conformal field theory. Such theories are known to arise as ultrarelativistic ($c\rightarrow0$) contractions of relativistic 2d conformal field theories. Under this contraction, the Virasoro algebra becomes the conformal Carrollian algebra and the Brown-Henneaux central charges become $c_L=0$, $c_M=\frac{3}{G}$. In this article, we recover these central charges directly from holography. We first construct the holographic quasilocal stress tensor for asymptotically flat spacetimes carrying Bondi mass and angular momentum. Under BMS$_3$ transformations, the stress tensor acquires an inhomogeneous term, the ``BMS Schwarzian", and extracting the central charges from it reproduces the algebraic result exactly. We then obtain the action for the boundary BMS Schwarzian modes. Finally, we show that the holographic stress-tensor correlators satisfy the expected Ward identity, while stress-tensor conservation obeys flux-balance laws.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [22]

    Bhambure and H

    J. Bhambure and H. Krishna,A stress tensor for asymptotically flat spacetime,2412.08588

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv

    J.M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

    arXiv 1998

  3. [2]

    Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

    arXiv 1998

  4. [3]

    Gubser, I.R

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109]

    arXiv 1998

  5. [4]

    Deser, R

    S. Deser, R. Jackiw and G. ’t Hooft,Three-Dimensional Einstein Gravity: Dynamics of Flat Space,Annals Phys.152(1984) 220

    1984

  6. [5]

    Witten,(2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System,Nucl

    E. Witten,(2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System,Nucl. Phys. B311 (1988) 46

    1988

  7. [6]

    Barnich and G

    G. Barnich and G. Compere,Classical central extension for asymptotic symmetries at null infinity in three spacetime dimensions,Class. Quant. Grav.24(2007) F15 [gr-qc/0610130]

    arXiv 2007

  8. [7]

    Barnich, A

    G. Barnich, A. Gomberoff and H.A. Gonzalez,The Flat limit of three dimensional asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 024020 [1204.3288]

    arXiv 2012

Show all 77 references
  1. [8]

    Sachs,Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theory,Physical Review128(1962) 2851

    R. Sachs,Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theory,Physical Review128(1962) 2851

    1962

  2. [9]

    Bondi, M.G.J

    H. Bondi, M.G.J. van der Burg and A.W.K. Metzner,Gravitational waves in general relativity. vii. waves from axi-symmetric isolated systems,Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences269(1962) 21

    1962

  3. [10]

    Barnich and C

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert,Symmetries of asymptotically flat 4 dimensional spacetimes at null infinity revisited,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 111103 [0909.2617]

    2010 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Barnich and C

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert,Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence,JHEP05(2010) 062 [1001.1541]

    2010 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Strominger and A

    A. Strominger and A. Zhiboedov,Gravitational Memory, BMS Supertranslations and Soft Theorems,JHEP01(2016) 086 [1411.5745]

    2016 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory, Princeton University Press (2018), [1703.05448]

    A. Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory, Princeton University Press (2018), [1703.05448]

    2018 arXiv

  7. [14]

    de Boer and S.N

    J. de Boer and S.N. Solodukhin,A Holographic reduction of Minkowski space-time,Nucl. Phys. B665(2003) 545 [hep-th/0303006]

    2003 arXiv

  8. [15]

    T. He, V. Lysov, P. Mitra and A. Strominger,BMS supertranslations and Weinberg’s soft graviton theorem,JHEP05(2015) 151 [1401.7026]

    2015 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Cachazo and A

    F. Cachazo and A. Strominger,Evidence for a New Soft Graviton Theorem,1404.4091

    arXiv

  10. [17]

    Balasubramanian and P

    V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus,A Stress tensor for Anti-de Sitter gravity,Commun. Math. Phys.208(1999) 413 [hep-th/9902121]

    1999 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Brown and M

    J.D. Brown and M. Henneaux,Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,Commun. Math. Phys.104 (1986) 207

    1986

  12. [19]

    Ciambelli,Asymptotic limit of null hypersurfaces,Class

    L. Ciambelli,Asymptotic limit of null hypersurfaces,Class. Quant. Grav.42(2025) 235020 [2501.17357]

    2025

  13. [20]

    Freidel and P

    L. Freidel and P. Jai-akson,Carrollian hydrodynamics and symplectic structure on stretched horizons,JHEP05(2024) 135 [2211.06415]. – 34 –

    2024 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Freidel and P

    L. Freidel and P. Jai-akson,Geometry of Carrollian stretched horizons,Class. Quant. Grav. 42(2025) 065010 [2406.06709]

    2025 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Beig and B.G

    R. Beig and B.G. Schmidt,Einstein’s equations near spatial infinity,Commun. Math. Phys. 87(1982) 65

    1982

  16. [24]

    Ashtekar and R.O

    A. Ashtekar and R.O. Hansen,A unified treatment of null and spatial infinity in general relativity. i. universal structure, asymptotic symmetries, and conserved quantities at spatial infinity,J. Math. Phys.19(1978) 1542

    1978

  17. [25]

    Comp` ere, S.E

    G. Comp` ere, S.E. Gralla and H. Wei,An asymptotic framework for gravitational scattering, Class. Quant. Grav.40(2023) 205018 [2303.17124]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Duval, G.W

    C. Duval, G.W. Gibbons, P.A. Horvathy and P.M. Zhang,Carroll versus Newton and Galilei: two dual non-Einsteinian concepts of time,Class. Quant. Grav.31(2014) 085016 [1402.0657]

    2014 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Ruzziconi,Carrollian physics and holography,Phys

    R. Ruzziconi,Carrollian physics and holography,Phys. Rept.1182(2026) 1 [2602.02644]

    2026

  20. [28]

    Bagchi, A

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, P. Dhivakar, S. Mondal and A. Shukla,The Carrollian kaleidoscope, Eur. Phys. J. C86(2026) 429 [2506.16164]

    2026 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Alday, M

    L.F. Alday, M. Nocchi, R. Ruzziconi and A. Yelleshpur Srikant,Carrollian amplitudes from holographic correlators,JHEP03(2025) 158 [2406.19343]

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Kulkarni, R

    H. Kulkarni, R. Ruzziconi and A. Yelleshpur Srikant,On Carrollian and celestial correlators in general dimensions,JHEP10(2025) 187 [2508.06602]

    2025 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Lipstein, R

    A. Lipstein, R. Ruzziconi and A. Yelleshpur Srikant,Towards a flat space Carrollian hologram from AdS4/CFT3,JHEP06(2025) 073 [2504.10291]

    2025 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Susskind,Holography in the flat space limit,AIP Conf

    L. Susskind,Holography in the flat space limit,AIP Conf. Proc.493(1999) 98 [hep-th/9901079]

    1999 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Giddings,The Boundary S matrix and the AdS to CFT dictionary,Phys

    S.B. Giddings,The Boundary S matrix and the AdS to CFT dictionary,Phys. Rev. Lett.83 (1999) 2707 [hep-th/9903048]

    1999 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Polchinski,S matrices from AdS space-time,hep-th/9901076

    J. Polchinski,S matrices from AdS space-time,hep-th/9901076

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Bagchi, R

    A. Bagchi, R. Gopakumar, I. Mandal and A. Miwa,GCA in 2d,JHEP08(2010) 004 [0912.1090]

    2010 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Bagchi,Correspondence between Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes and Nonrelativistic Conformal Field Theories,Phys

    A. Bagchi,Correspondence between Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes and Nonrelativistic Conformal Field Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 171601 [1006.3354]

    2010 arXiv

  29. [37]

    P.-x. Hao, W. Song, X. Xie and Y. Zhong,BMS-invariant free scalar model,Phys. Rev. D 105(2022) 125005 [2111.04701]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Bagchi, A

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, S. Dutta, K.S. Kolekar and P. Sharma,Carroll covariant scalar fields in two dimensions,JHEP01(2023) 072 [2203.13197]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Chandrasekaran, E.E

    V. Chandrasekaran, E.E. Flanagan, I. Shehzad and A.J. Speranza,Brown-York charges at null boundaries,JHEP01(2022) 029 [2109.11567]

    2022 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Merbis and M

    W. Merbis and M. Riegler,Geometric actions and flat space holography,JHEP02(2020) 125 [1912.08207]

    2020 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Cotler, K

    J. Cotler, K. Jensen, S. Prohazka, M. Riegler and J. Salzer,Soft gravitons in three dimensions,JHEP07(2025) 002 [2411.13633]. – 35 –

    2025 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Prema, G

    A.B. Prema, G. Comp` ere, L. Pipolo de Gioia, I. Mol and B. Swidler,Celestial holography: Lectures on asymptotic symmetries,SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes47(2022) 1 [2109.00997]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Bagchi, S

    A. Bagchi, S. Dutta, K.S. Kolekar and P. Sharma,BMS field theories and Weyl anomaly, JHEP07(2021) 101 [2104.10405]

    2021 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Maldacena and D

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford,Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 106002 [1604.07818]

    2016 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Cotler and K

    J. Cotler and K. Jensen,A theory of reparameterizations for AdS 3 gravity,JHEP02(2019) 079 [1808.03263]

    2019 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Brown and J.W

    J.D. Brown and J.W. York,Quasilocal energy and conserved charges derived from the gravitational action,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 1407

    1993

  39. [47]

    Hartong, E

    J. Hartong, E. Have, V. Nenmeli and G. Oling,Boundary Energy-Momentum Tensors for Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes,2505.05432

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    Fiorucci, S

    A. Fiorucci, S. Pekar, P. Marios Petropoulos and M. Vilatte,Carrollian-Holographic Derivation of Gravitational Flux-Balance Laws,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 261602 [2505.00077]

    2025

  41. [49]

    Chandrasekaran, ´E.´E

    V. Chandrasekaran, ´E.´E. Flanagan and K. Prabhu,Symmetries and charges of general relativity at null boundaries,JHEP11(2018) 125 [1807.11499]

    2018 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Gibbons and S.W

    G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking,Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2752

    1977

  43. [51]

    York, Jr.,Role of conformal three geometry in the dynamics of gravitation,Phys

    J.W. York, Jr.,Role of conformal three geometry in the dynamics of gravitation,Phys. Rev. Lett.28(1972) 1082

    1972

  44. [52]

    de Haro, S.N

    S. de Haro, S.N. Solodukhin and K. Skenderis,Holographic reconstruction of space-time and renormalization in the AdS / CFT correspondence,Commun. Math. Phys.217(2001) 595 [hep-th/0002230]

    2001 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Skenderis,Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,Class

    K. Skenderis,Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 5849 [hep-th/0209067]

    2002 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Emparan, C.V

    R. Emparan, C.V. Johnson and R.C. Myers,Surface terms as counterterms in the AdS / CFT correspondence,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 104001 [hep-th/9903238]

    1999 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Fefferman and C.R

    C. Fefferman and C.R. Graham,Conformal invariants, in ´Elie Cartan et les math´ ematiques d’aujourd’hui (Lyon, 1984), no. S131 in Ast´ erisque, pp. 95–116, Soci´ et´ e math´ ematique de France (1985)

    1985

  48. [56]

    Henningson and K

    M. Henningson and K. Skenderis,The Holographic Weyl anomaly,JHEP07(1998) 023 [hep-th/9806087]

    1998 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Riello and L

    A. Riello and L. Freidel,Renormalization of conformal infinity as a stretched horizon,Class. Quant. Grav.41(2024) 175013 [2402.03097]

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Gourgoulhon and J.L

    E. Gourgoulhon and J.L. Jaramillo,A 3+1 perspective on null hypersurfaces and isolated horizons,Phys. Rept.423(2006) 159 [gr-qc/0503113]

    2006 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Ciambelli, R.G

    L. Ciambelli, R.G. Leigh, C. Marteau and P.M. Petropoulos,Carroll Structures, Null Geometry and Conformal Isometries,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 046010 [1905.02221]

    2019 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Mars and J.M.M

    M. Mars and J.M.M. Senovilla,Geometry of general hypersurfaces in spacetime: junction conditions,Classical and Quantum Gravity10(1993) 1865. – 36 –

    1993

  53. [61]

    Chandrasekaran and A.J

    V. Chandrasekaran and A.J. Speranza,Anomalies in gravitational charge algebras of null boundaries and black hole entropy,JHEP01(2021) 137 [2009.10739]

    2021 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Ashtekar and M

    A. Ashtekar and M. Streubel,Symplectic geometry of radiative modes and conserved quantities at null infinity,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A376(1981) 585

    1981

  55. [63]

    Wald and A

    R.M. Wald and A. Zoupas,A General definition of ’conserved quantities’ in general relativity and other theories of gravity,Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 084027 [gr-qc/9911095]

    2000 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Cotler, P

    J. Cotler, P. Dhivakar and K. Jensen,Carrollian holographic duals are non-local,2512.05072

  57. [65]

    Barnich, A

    G. Barnich, A. Gomberoff and H.A. Gonz´ alez,Three-dimensional Bondi-Metzner-Sachs invariant two-dimensional field theories as the flat limit of Liouville theory,Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 124032 [1210.0731]

    2013 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Campoleoni, L

    A. Campoleoni, L. Ciambelli, A. Delfante, C. Marteau, P.M. Petropoulos and R. Ruzziconi, Holographic Lorentz and Carroll frames,JHEP12(2022) 007 [2208.07575]

    2022 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Bagchi, P

    A. Bagchi, P. Dhivakar and S. Dutta,3D stress tensor for gravity in 4D flat spacetime,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 066013 [2408.05494]

    2026 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Bagchi, D

    A. Bagchi, D. Grumiller and W. Merbis,Stress tensor correlators in three-dimensional gravity,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 061502 [1507.05620]

    2016 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Bagchi, M

    A. Bagchi, M. Gary and Zodinmawia,Bondi-Metzner-Sachs bootstrap,Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 025007 [1612.01730]

    2017 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Hartong, E

    J. Hartong, E. Have, V. Nenmeli and G. Oling,The Energy-Momentum-News Complex near Future Null Infinity,2607.07872

    arXiv

  63. [71]

    Parattu, S

    K. Parattu, S. Chakraborty, B.R. Majhi and T. Padmanabhan,A Boundary Term for the Gravitational Action with Null Boundaries,Gen. Rel. Grav.48(2016) 94 [1501.01053]

    2016 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Barnich, H.A

    G. Barnich, H.A. Gonzalez and P. Salgado-Rebolledo,Geometric actions for three-dimensional gravity,Class. Quant. Grav.35(2018) 014003 [1707.08887]

    2018 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Barnich and B

    G. Barnich and B. Oblak,Notes on the BMS group in three dimensions: II. Coadjoint representation,JHEP03(2015) 033 [1502.00010]

    2015 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Henneaux and P

    M. Henneaux and P. Salgado-Rebolledo,Carroll contractions of Lorentz-invariant theories, JHEP11(2021) 180 [2109.06708]

    2021 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Marotta, A

    R. Marotta, A. Shekar and M. Verma,Carrollian Conformal Theories in Momentum Space, 2512.06881

  68. [76]

    Hao and S

    P.-X. Hao and S. Takahashi,Conformal blocks in 2D Carrollian-Galilean CFTs and excited state entanglement entropy,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 106014 [2510.25688]

    2026 arXiv

  69. [77]

    de Boer, J

    J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N.A. Obers, W. Sybesma and S. Vandoren,Carroll Symmetry, Dark Energy and Inflation,Front. in Phys.10(2022) 810405 [2110.02319]. – 37 –

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.