Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Cosmic chronometers to calibrate the ladders and measure the curvature of the Universe. A model-independent study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.09591 v3 pith:RZE6B4ZP submitted 2023-01-23 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords cosmicdataomegasniameasurechronometersconstantcurvature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We use the state-of-the-art data on cosmic chronometers (CCH) and the Pantheon+ compilation of supernovae of Type Ia (SNIa) to test the constancy of the SNIa absolute magnitude, $M$, and the robustness of the cosmological principle (CP) at $z\lesssim 2$ with a model-agnostic approach. We do so by reconstructing $M(z)$ and the curvature parameter $\Omega_{k}(z)$ using Gaussian Processes. Moreover, we use CCH in combination with data on baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) from various galaxy surveys (6dFGS, BOSS, eBOSS, WiggleZ, DES Y3) to measure the sound horizon at the baryon-drag epoch, $r_d$, from each BAO data point and check their consistency. Given the precision allowed by the CCH, we find that $M(z)$, $\Omega_k(z)$ and $r_d(z)$ are fully compatible (at $<68\%$ C.L.) with constant values. This justifies our final analyses, in which we put constraints on these constant parameters under the validity of the CP, the metric description of gravity and standard physics in the vicinity of the stellar objects, but otherwise in a model-independent way. If we exclude the SNIa contained in the host galaxies employed by SH0ES, our results read $M=(-19.314^{+0.086}_{-0.108})$ mag, $r_d=(142.3\pm 5.3)$ Mpc and $\Omega_k=-0.07^{+0.12}_{-0.15}$, with $H_0=(71.5\pm 3.1)$ km/s/Mpc ($68\%$ C.L.). These values are independent from the main data sets involved in the $H_0$ tension, namely, the cosmic microwave background and the first two rungs of the cosmic distance ladder. If, instead, we also consider the SNIa in the host galaxies, calibrated with Cepheids, we measure $M=(-19.252^{+0.024}_{-0.036})$ mag, $r_d=(141.9^{+5.6}_{-4.9})$ Mpc, $\Omega_k=-0.10^{+0.12}_{-0.15}$ and $H_0=(74.0^{+0.9}_{-1.0})$ km/s/Mpc.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BAO miscalibration cannot rescue late-time solutions to the Hubble tension

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Even after rescaling BAO data to prefer H0≈73 km/s/Mpc, none of six tested late-time dark-energy models can resolve the Hubble tension once unanchored SNeIa and CMB geometry are included.

  2. Quasar cosmology II: joint analyses with Cosmic Microwave Background

    astro-ph.CO 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Quasar, supernova, BAO, DES, and CMB data are jointly compatible only in an interacting dark-energy model, not in Lambda-CDM, wCDM, or CPL.

  3. KAN-LSTM-Transformer Neural Networks, MFV and Cosmological Parameters

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    KLT-Net reconstructs the SN Ia distance modulus non-parametrically; with MFV M_B and flat-ΛCDM Bayesian/Hessian inference it yields H0 ≈ 69.6 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹ and Ωm ≈ 0.30.

  4. Cosmographic analysis of sign-switching dark energy

    gr-qc 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    New sign-switching dark energy models with ladder, smooth-step and error-function profiles are introduced and compared, with continuous transitions shown to convert the Lambda_sCDM sudden singularity into a milder w-s...

  5. Testing Planck 2020 and DESI data on wCDM Models

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Fitting four wCDM dark energy parameterizations to Planck 2020, DESI, and late-time data still favors ΛCDM, with newer data giving tighter constraints.

Pith tools