Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 157 references

Deformed Compact Objects in General Relativity and Modified Gravity

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-11 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read An effective deformation parameter and f(R,T) gravity both raise the maximum mass compact stars can support for a fixed equation of state.

desk verdict Competent thesis that systematically combines an existing one-parameter deformation with f(R,T) stellar structure; the mass shifts are real within the model but partly driven by an ad-hoc mass rescaling the author himself flags. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07736 v1 pith:RZYXAKTP submitted 2026-07-07 gr-qc

Jonathan Tejeda Quartuccio This is my paper
classification gr-qc PACS 04.40.Dg04.50.Kd97.60.Jd
keywords compactobjectsneutronstarsTolman-Oppenheimer-VolkoffdeformedTOVf(RT)gravityequationofstatestrangemass-radiusrelation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This thesis asks how far the usual spherical, static picture of neutron stars and strange stars can be stretched before the predicted masses and radii change in an important way. It introduces a single dimensionless parameter D that rescales the radial part of the metric and the mass-continuity equation, recovering the ordinary Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff equations when D equals one. Oblate (D less than one) sequences systematically support larger masses and radii than the spherical case; prolate (D greater than one) sequences are lighter and more compact. The same deformed structure equations are then solved inside two f(R,T) models whose extra terms couple geometry to the trace of the energy-momentum tensor. Those couplings further shift the mass–radius curves, generally allowing still higher maximum masses for positive coupling strength. The calculations are performed for three standard equations of state (GM1 hadronic, MIT bag quark matter, and a polytrope), so the geometric and gravitational effects can be compared side by side. The practical claim is that both effective shape and matter–geometry coupling can move equilibrium sequences enough to matter for the interpretation of the heaviest observed compact objects.

What carries the argument

The deformed Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff (D-TOV) system: the metric ansatz ds^{2} = e^{2Φ} dt^{2} − (1 − 2m/r)^(−D) dr^{2} − r^{2} dΩ^{2} together with the effective mass continuity dm/dr = 4π D r^{2} ε, which reduces to ordinary TOV when D = 1 and is then inserted into the hydrostatic equations of f(R,T) gravity.

What would settle it

Construct fully axisymmetric equilibrium models (or slow-rotation Hartle–Thorne sequences) with the same microphysical equations of state and check whether the mass–radius shifts predicted by the D-TOV sequences for D near 0.9–1.1 survive once a consistent exterior geometry is imposed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Within the one-parameter D-TOV formalism, oblate configurations (D < 1) support systematically larger masses and radii than the spherical limit for a given equation of state, while prolate configurations (D > 1) produce lighter, more compact stars; when the same deformation is combined with linear or optimized f(R,T) = R + f(T) gravity, the trace-dependent couplings further raise the maximum supported mass.

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction treats a single constant D as an adequate stand-in for moderate non-spherical shape even though the angular part of the metric stays spherical and no consistent exterior vacuum solution is matched for D not equal to one.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Oblate-like sequences for a fixed equation of state can reach higher maximum masses than the corresponding spherical models, offering an additional channel for accommodating objects near or above two solar masses.
  • Positive matter–geometry coupling in linear f(R,T) systematically increases maximum mass for any fixed D, so the combined effect of deformation and modified gravity can exceed either correction alone.
  • Radial-mode frequencies extracted on the deformed backgrounds are sensitive to D, supplying an independent dynamical diagnostic of the same equilibrium sequences.
  • Canonical-mass radius constraints can already limit how far D may deviate from unity for a given equation of state before the predicted radius becomes observationally implausible.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mass–radius degeneracy between D and the f(R,T) coupling is not broken by additional observables (tidal deformability, moment of inertia, or oscillation frequencies), future multimessenger data may still leave the two effects entangled.
  • The same effective D-framework could be used as a cheap prior when scanning hybrid or hyperonic equations of state to estimate how much of a mass excess might be absorbed by moderate global deformation before invoking new microphysics.
  • Because the exterior matching is left incomplete, gravitational-wave templates built on these interiors would need a separate matching calculation before they could be compared with actual ringdown or continuous-wave signals.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This doctoral thesis investigates hydrostatic equilibrium of neutron stars and strange stars under an effective one-parameter deformation (D-TOV) in General Relativity and in f(R,T)=R+f(T) gravity (optimized nonlinear and linear 2λT models). After reviewing dense-matter microphysics and deriving the standard TOV, D-TOV, and modified-gravity structure equations (with full algebra in Appendices A–D), the author integrates sequences for GM1, MIT bag, and polytropic EoSs. The main reported result is that oblate-like D<1 configurations support larger masses and radii than the spherical case, prolate D>1 configurations are lighter and more compact, and positive λ (or the optimized f(T) sector) further raises maximum masses; a preliminary hybrid-star and radial-oscillation analysis is also included.

Significance. If the D-TOV framework is accepted as a controlled phenomenological probe of moderate non-sphericity, the work provides a useful unified survey of how geometric deformation and trace-dependent matter–geometry coupling separately and jointly shift mass–radius sequences across standard EoSs. Strengths include complete algebraic derivations of the equilibrium equations, systematic numerical sequences (mass–radius, central-density, and internal profiles), and explicit recovery of known limits (D→1, f(T)→0). The radial-mode table and hybrid Maxwell construction are secondary but add breadth. The significance is primarily methodological and exploratory rather than a definitive prediction for real deformed stars, because the deformation scheme is not a self-consistent axisymmetric GR solution.

major comments (3)
  1. §3.3.1 and Eqs. (3.63)–(3.64) [also (5.1)–(5.2)]: Φ′ is obtained from the rr Einstein equation of the deformed metric (3.58), but the mass continuity dm/dr=4π D r² ε is introduced by hand as a ‘deformed volume element’ and is explicitly not derived from the tt component (Appendix C). The gravitational mass that enters a(r)=1−2m/r is therefore not the mass consistent with the same metric that generates hydrostatic balance. Because both the pressure gradient and the enclosed mass are rescaled by the free parameter D, the large reported Mmax shifts (e.g. GM1 ~3.06 M⊙ at D=0.8 to ~1.88 M⊙ at D=1.2 in §5.1.1) may be driven largely by the artificial mass rescaling rather than by a genuine geometric effect. The same construction is inherited by the f(R,T) mass equation (4.34). The manuscript acknowledges the phenomenological character of the ansatz but still presents the sequences as evidence t
  2. §§3.3.1–3.3.2: For D≠1 the metric is not an exact exterior vacuum solution, and no matching to a consistent exterior (e.g. Hartle–Thorne or axisymmetric vacuum) is performed; the surface is defined solely by p(R)=0. The reported ‘mass’ and ‘radius’ are therefore interior-sequence labels, not necessarily the asymptotic gravitational mass and circumferential radius that observers would measure. The abstract and conclusions should state this limitation more sharply when comparing to pulsar mass–radius constraints and to GW190814, and any observational language should be restricted to qualitative trends within the effective model.
  3. §5.2 and Table 5.1: The optimized f(T) functional is taken from a cosmological Gaussian-process reconstruction, then A, β, γ are strongly re-tuned for stellar applications while α, λ, T0 are kept fixed. The resulting NS sequences are only slightly more massive/extended than GR. The claim that the ‘optimized’ model modifies stellar structure is therefore largely a statement about a new phenomenological parameter set, not a prediction of the cosmologically reconstructed f(T). The text should separate (a) the cosmological functional as motivation from (b) the stellar re-fit, and avoid implying that the same optimized model simultaneously describes cosmology and compact stars without further justification.
minor comments (6)
  1. §5.5 / Table 5.5: Radial frequencies are shown only for D=0.9 and D=1.0 and for selected modes; the surface residual (5.22) uses the spherical factor (1−2M/R). Clarify whether this boundary condition is consistent with the deformed background for D≠1, and extend or qualify the stability discussion accordingly.
  2. §5.4: The hybrid Maxwell construction is performed once at the EoS level and then fed into D-TOV; the transition is not re-matched for each D. Label Fig. 5.25 more clearly as exploratory and avoid over-interpreting the ‘stable’ solid segments.
  3. Notation: the radial metric potential is called Λ(r) in Ch. 3 and ω(r) in Ch. 4; the cosmological constant is also Λ. A short notation table would reduce confusion.
  4. Several figures (e.g. 5.1–5.8) would benefit from explicit numerical Mmax and Req values in the captions or a summary table for the pure GR D-TOV sequences, analogous to Tables 5.2–5.4.
  5. Typos and language: occasional missing spaces in Portuguese/English front matter and compound words (e.g. ‘doutorado-sanduíche’, ‘Porfim’); standardize ‘D-TOV’ vs ‘D–TOV’ and ‘f(R,T)’ spacing throughout.
  6. Related literature: when discussing effective deformation, a brief comparison to existing anisotropic-fluid TOV models (Bowers–Liang and later works) and to slow-rotation Hartle–Thorne would help place the D ansatz relative to standard alternatives.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: D and λ are free phenomenological parameters scanned over modest ranges; EoSs are external inputs; mass continuity is an openly admitted effective ansatz (not derived from the deformed metric's tt equation); self-citations are normal thesis-related papers, not uniqueness theorems forcing the result.

  1. ansatz smuggled in via citation [§3.3.1, eqs. (3.58), (3.64); also inherited by (4.34)]
    "Finally, within the same effective spheroidal prescription of Zubairi et al. (2017), the enclosed mass is modeled by introducing a deformed volume element. It is important to emphasize that this mass-continuity relation is not derived directly from the tt component of the field equations for the metric (3.58). Rather, it should be understood as an effective prescription that rescales the standard spherical mass integral... dm(r)/dr = 4π D r^{2} ε(r)"

    The central numerical claim (D significantly shifts Mmax and R) rests on the coupled system that uses this mass equation. The paper itself states the mass equation is not obtained from the Einstein equations of the deformed metric but is imported as an effective volume-element rescaling from the cited prior work. Because both the hydrostatic balance and the enclosed mass that enters a(r) are rescaled by the same free D, part of the reported mass-radius effect is built into the ansatz rather than derived from the geometry alone. The paper is transparent about the phenomenological status, so this is only a mild (not load-bearing) circularity of the 'effective deformation' interpretation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: Einstein equations (or f(R,T) field equations) + phenomenological metric ansatz (3.58)/(4.29) with free D + effective (not field-equation-derived) mass continuity dm/dr = 4π D r^{2} ε (explicitly flagged in §3.3.1) + external EoS (GM1 table, MIT bag, polytrope) → numerical integration of the structure ODEs → M(R) sequences. The reported shifts with D or λ are simply the solutions of those ODEs; nothing is fitted to data and then re-predicted, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors to forbid alternatives, and the optimized f(T) parameters are taken from an external cosmological reconstruction then openly re-tuned for stellar densities (Table 5.1). Self-citations are to the author's own prior papers that develop the same framework (normal for a thesis) and are not load-bearing for a claimed first-principles result. The skeptic concern that the mass rescaling is ad-hoc is a correctness/consistency issue of the model, not circularity of the derivation. Score 2 only for the minor self-citation chain and the transparent phenomenological character of the mass equation.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on a phenomenological metric deformation, standard perfect-fluid GR and f(R,T) field equations, three external EoSs, and a handful of free coupling/deformation parameters that are scanned rather than derived. No new fundamental fields or particles are introduced; the only invented construct is the effective D-rescaling itself.

free parameters (5)
  • D (deformation parameter) = 0.8–1.2 (exploratory)
    Scanned over 0.8–1.2; controls both the radial metric power and the mass-continuity prefactor. Not fixed by any first-principles calculation.
  • λ (linear f(R,T) coupling) = 0–0.16
    Scanned over 0, 0.08, 0.16; multiplies the trace term. Chosen to keep f_T ≪ 8π.
  • optimized f(T) coefficients (A, β, γ) = A=5e-4, β=γ=1.05e-3 (stellar)
    Cosmological values strongly suppressed for stellar densities (Table 5.1); phenomenological retuning required for acceptable NS sequences.
  • MIT bag constant B = 60 MeV/fm³
    Fixed at 60 MeV fm^{-3}; standard but free within the usual 50–90 range.
  • polytropic K, Γ = K=100–150, Γ=2
    K=100 or 150 km², Γ=2 (or 5/3 for comparison); pure phenomenological baseline.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Einstein field equations (or their f(R,T)=R+f(T) generalization) with perfect-fluid energy-momentum tensor and Λ=0.
    Standard starting point of Chapters 3–4; no alternative gravity or imperfect-fluid stress is considered.
  • ad hoc to paper The effective line element with radial power −D and the rescaled mass continuity dm/dr=4π D r² ε adequately capture moderate global deformation.
    Introduced in §3.3 following Zubairi et al.; explicitly not a solution of the full axisymmetric Einstein equations.
  • domain assumption Barotropic EoS p=p(ε) closes the system; temperature, magnetic fields and rotation are neglected except through the effective D.
    Standard cold-star approximation used throughout Chapter 5.
  • ad hoc to paper Surface defined by p(R)=0; no exterior matching required for the interior sequences.
    Stated in §§3.3.1 and 5.1; Birkhoff’s theorem is abandoned for D≠1.
invented entities (1)
  • D-TOV effective deformation scheme
    purpose: Encode global oblate/prolate shape into a one-dimensional hydrostatic equation without solving 2-D Einstein equations.
    Phenomenological construct; independent evidence would require comparison with full numerical-relativity or Hartle–Thorne sequences, which is not provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Deformed Compact Objects in General Relativity and Modified Gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RZYXAKTP

@misc{pith2026260707736,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Deformed Compact Objects in General Relativity and Modified Gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RZYXAKTP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07736}
}
read the original abstract

Neutron stars and related compact objects are unique laboratories for probing matter at supranuclear densities and gravity in the strong-field regime. In this thesis, we investigate the hydrostatic equilibrium of compact stars in different geometric and gravitational scenarios, combining relativistic stellar structure, dense-matter microphysics, and numerical modeling. We derive the standard Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equation in General Relativity, introduce an effective one-parameter deformation scheme leading to the deformed TOV (D-TOV) formalism, and extend the hydrostatic equilibrium framework to f(R,T) gravity. Using these structure equations, we compute equilibrium sequences for neutron stars and strange stars described by the GM1 equation of state, the MIT Bag Model, and a polytropic equation of state. In General Relativity, the deformation parameter D significantly affects the global stellar properties: oblate configurations generally support larger masses and radii than the spherical case, while prolate configurations lead to less massive and more compact stars. In optimized and linear f(R,T) models, trace-dependent matter-geometry couplings further modify the mass-radius relation and the maximum supported mass. Overall, the results indicate that effective deformation and trace-dependent matter-geometry coupling can significantly affect the equilibrium structure of compact stars.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07736 by the authors.

Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1. Observed masses of selected pulsars, highlighting the canonical mass scale [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_1_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1.2
Figure 1.2. Representative masses of compact objects inferred from selected gravitational [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_1_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1.3
Figure 1.3. Schematic representation of the deformation parameter: spherical configura [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_1_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (38 more)
Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1: Relative particle abundances in neutron-star matter as a function of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_2_1.png]
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.2. Figure 2.2: Schematic structures of a strange quark star (left) and a neutron star (right). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_2_2.png]
Figure 2.3
Figure 2.3. Figure 2.3: Pressure as a function of energy density for representative equations of state. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_2_3.png]
Figure 2.4
Figure 2.4. Figure 2.4: Energy per baryon E/A for different forms of matter (see Weber, 2005). some of the u and d quarks into s quarks, consistent with beta equilibrium. Heavier quark flavors (c, b, and t) are not expected to be populated in NS interiors because of their large current mass…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows the stellar mass as a function of the normalized central energy den [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p067_5.png]
Figure 5.1
Figure 5.1. Figure 5.1: Mass–radius relations obtained from the D-TOV equations in General Rela￾tivity using the GM1 equation of state, for different values of the deformation parameter D. The markers indicate the maximum-mass configuration of each sequence. Another relevant aspect of [PIT…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows the normalized energy-density profiles corresponding to the maximum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p068_5.png]
Figure 5.2
Figure 5.2. Figure 5.2: Stellar mass as a function of the normalized central energy density for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p069_5_2.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows the normalized pressure profiles for the maximum-mass configurations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p069_5.png]
Figure 5.3
Figure 5.3. Figure 5.3: Normalized energy-density profiles for the maximum-mass configurations ob [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p070_5_3.png]
Figure 5.4
Figure 5.4. Figure 5.4: Normalized pressure profiles for the maximum-mass configurations obtained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p071_5_4.png]
Figure 5.5
Figure 5.5. Figure 5.5: Mass–radius relations obtained from the D-TOV equations in General Relativ￾ity using the massless MIT Bag Model, for different values of the deformation parameter D. The markers indicate the maximum-mass configuration of each sequence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_f…
Figure 5.6
Figure 5.6. Figure 5.6: Stellar mass as a function of the normalized central energy density for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p073_5_6.png]
Figure 5.7
Figure 5.7. Figure 5.7: Normalized pressure profiles for the maximum-mass configurations obtained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p074_5_7.png]
Figure 5.8
Figure 5.8. Figure 5.8: Normalized energy-density profiles for the maximum-mass configurations ob [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p075_5_8.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows the stellar mass as a function of the normalized central energy density. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p076_5.png]
Figure 5.9
Figure 5.9. Figure 5.9: Mass–radius relation for neutron stars in General Relativity and optimized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p077_5_9.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows the normalized pressure profiles. The pressure decreases smoothly [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p077_5.png]
Figure 5.10
Figure 5.10. Figure 5.10: Stellar mass as a function of the normalized central energy density for neutron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p078_5_10.png]
Figure 5.11
Figure 5.11. Figure 5.11: Normalized pressure profiles for neutron stars in General Relativity and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p079_5_11.png]
Figure 5.12
Figure 5.12. Figure 5.12: Normalized energy-density profiles for neutron stars in General Relativity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p080_5_12.png]
Figure 5.13
Figure 5.13. Figure 5.13: Mass–radius relations for neutron stars in General Relativity and optimized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p081_5_13.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows the mass–radius relation for NSs described by the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p081_5.png]
Figure 5.14
Figure 5.14. Figure 5.14: Mass–radius relations obtained for neutron stars described by the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p082_5_14.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows the stellar mass as a function of the normalized central energy density. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p083_5.png]
Figure 5.15
Figure 5.15. Figure 5.15: Stellar mass as a function of the normalized central energy density for neutron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p084_5_15.png]
Figure 5.16
Figure 5.16. Figure 5.16: Normalized pressure profiles for the maximum-mass configurations obtained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p085_5_16.png]
Figure 5.17
Figure 5.17. Figure 5.17: Normalized energy-density profiles for the maximum-mass configurations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p085_5_17.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows a behavior qualitatively similar to that already observed in Fig. 5.5, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p086_5.png]
Figure 5.18
Figure 5.18. Figure 5.18: Mass–radius relations obtained for strange stars described by the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p086_5_18.png]
Figure 5.19
Figure 5.19. Figure 5.19: Stellar mass as a function of the normalized central energy density for strange [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p087_5_19.png]
Figure 5.20
Figure 5.20. Figure 5.20: Normalized pressure profiles for the maximum-mass configurations obtained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p087_5_20.png]
Figure 5.21
Figure 5.21. Figure 5.21: Normalized energy-density profiles for the maximum-mass configurations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p088_5_21.png]
Figure 5.22
Figure 5.22. Figure 5.22: Mass–radius relations for strange stars in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p089_5_22.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows the solutions obtained for the MIT Bag Model when the strange-quark [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p089_5.png]
Figure 5.23
Figure 5.23. Figure 5.23: Mass–radius relations obtained for neutron stars described by the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p091_5_23.png]
Figure 5.24
Figure 5.24. Figure 5.24: Stellar mass as a function of the normalized central energy density for neutron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p092_5_24.png]
Figure 5.25
Figure 5.25. Figure 5.25: Preliminary mass–radius relations for hybrid stars obtained by employing a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p094_5_25.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

157 extracted references · 157 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume=

    Formation and evolution of binary neutron stars , author=. Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume=

    work page

  2. [2]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    GW150914: The Advanced LIGO detectors in the era of first discoveries , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.161101 2017

  4. [4]

    Multi-messenger observations of a binary neutron star merger , author=

    work page

  5. [5]

    2007 , eprint=

    Neutron Star Interiors and the Equation of State of Superdense Matter , author=. 2007 , eprint=

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    International Journal of Modern Physics , year = 2020, month = dec, volume = 30, doi =

    Modelling a 2.5 M_ Compact Star With Quark Matter. International Journal of Modern Physics , year = 2020, month = dec, volume = 30, doi =

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Probing Strange Stars with Advanced Gravitational Wave Detectors

    work page

  8. [8]

    GW190814: Spin and Equation of State of a Neutron Star Companion

    work page

Show all 157 references
  1. [9]

    International Journal of Modern Physics , year = 2017, volume = 45, doi =

    Stellar Structure Models of Deformed Neutron Stars. International Journal of Modern Physics , year = 2017, volume = 45, doi =

    2017

  2. [10]

    New quasiuniversal relations for static and rapid rotating neutron stars , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.023039 , url =

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series , volume=

    Stellar Structure Models of Deformed Neutron Stars , author=. International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series , volume=. 2017 , organization=

    2017

  4. [12]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume=

    Pulsars: structure and dynamics , author=. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume=. 1972 , publisher=

    1972

  5. [13]

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.084018 , url =

    Taylor Binnington and Eric Poisson , title =. doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.084018 , url =

    doi

  6. [14]

    Testing approximations of thermal effects in neutron star merger simulations , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2010 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.084043 , url =

    2010 doi

  7. [15]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    Modeling anisotropic magnetized white dwarfs with metric , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  8. [16]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.10264 , year=

    A light strange star in the remnant HESS J1731-347: minimal consistency checks , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.10264 , year=

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , volume=

    f (R) theories of gravity , author=. Reviews of Modern Physics , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  10. [18]

    International Journal of Modern Physics D , volume=

    Strange stars in energy--momentum-conserved f (R, T) gravity , author=. International Journal of Modern Physics D , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  11. [19]

    and Gouveia dal Pino, Elisabete Maria de and Medina Tanco, Gustavo Adolfo , journal=

    Horvath, J.E. and Gouveia dal Pino, Elisabete Maria de and Medina Tanco, Gustavo Adolfo , journal=. Astrof

  12. [20]

    Astronomia e Astrof

    de Souza Oliveira Filho, Kepler and Saraiva, Maria de F. Astronomia e Astrof. Rio Grande do Sul: Livraria da F

  13. [21]

    General Relativity and Gravitation , volume=

    General relativistic effects in the structure of massive white dwarfs , author=. General Relativity and Gravitation , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  14. [22]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Nearby supernova factory observations of SN 2007if: First total mass measurement of a super-Chandrasekhar-mass progenitor , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  15. [23]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    GW190814: gravitational waves from the coalescence of a 23 solar mass black hole with a 2.6 solar mass compact object , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  16. [24]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    The possibility of the secondary object in GW190814 as a neutron star , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  17. [25]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    Could the 2.6 M _ object in GW190814 be a primordial black hole? , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  18. [26]

    9.1587 C. vol. 9 , author=. Phys. Rev. D , pages=

  19. [27]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    Probing hybrid stars with gravitational waves via interfacial modes , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  20. [28]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Reconciliation of neutron-star masses and binding of the in hypernuclei , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 1991 , publisher=

    1991

  21. [29]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    Hybrid stars with the Dyson-Schwinger quark model , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  22. [30]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    New neutron star equation of state with quark--hadron crossover , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  23. [31]

    The European Physical Journal A , volume=

    From quark drops to quark stars: some aspects of the role of quark matter in compact stars , author=. The European Physical Journal A , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  24. [32]

    Astrophysical Journal, vol

    The ground state of matter at high densities: equation of state and stellar models , author=. Astrophysical Journal, vol. 170, p. 299 , volume=

  25. [33]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    A NICER view of PSR J0030+ 0451: Implications for the dense matter equation of state , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  26. [34]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    A NICER view of the massive pulsar PSR J0740+ 6620 informed by radio timing and XMM-Newton spectroscopy , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  27. [35]

    Nature Astronomy , volume=

    Relativistic Shapiro delay measurements of an extremely massive millisecond pulsar , author=. Nature Astronomy , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  28. [36]

    Science , volume=

    A massive pulsar in a compact relativistic binary , author=. Science , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  29. [37]

    nature , volume=

    A two-solar-mass neutron star measured using Shapiro delay , author=. nature , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  30. [38]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    On the minimum mass of neutron stars , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  31. [39]

    Nature Astronomy , volume=

    A strangely light neutron star within a supernova remnant , author=. Nature Astronomy , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  32. [40]

    Débora Peres Menezes and Kauan Dalfovo Marquez and Tiago José Nunes da Silva, , year=. Introdu

  33. [41]

    Introdução à Relatividade Geral e à Física de Estrelas Compactas , author=

  34. [42]

    Annalen der Physik , volume=

    The foundation of the general theory of relativity , author=. Annalen der Physik , volume=

  35. [43]

    Sitzungsberichte der K

    Die feldgleichungen der gravitation , author=. Sitzungsberichte der K

  36. [44]

    Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology , volume=

    CDM universe in f (R) gravity , author=. Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  37. [45]

    d'Inverno, Ray , year=. Einf

  38. [46]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Gravitational waves from first-order cosmological phase transitions , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

    1992

  39. [47]

    nd cr davidson , author=

    Ase eddington a. nd cr davidson , author=. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A , volume=

  40. [48]

    Schwarzschild, Karl , journal=

  41. [49]

    Kosmologische betrachtungen zur allgemeinen relativit

    Einstein, Albert , journal=. Kosmologische betrachtungen zur allgemeinen relativit

  42. [50]

    2000 , publisher=

    Cosmology: the science of the universe , author=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  43. [51]

    Proceedings of the national academy of sciences , volume=

    A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae , author=. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences , volume=. 1929 , publisher=

    1929

  44. [52]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  45. [53]

    The redshift of extragalactic nebulae , author=. Helv. Phys. Acta , volume=

  46. [54]

    Astrophysical Journal, vol

    Rotation of the Andromeda nebula from a spectroscopic survey of emission regions , author=. Astrophysical Journal, vol. 159, p. 379 , volume=

  47. [55]

    The astronomical journal , volume=

    Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant , author=. The astronomical journal , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

    1998

  48. [56]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Constraining dark energy with type Ia supernovae and large-scale structure , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

    1999

  49. [57]

    2017 , publisher=

    Introduction to cosmology , author=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  50. [58]

    American Journal of Physics , volume=

    Vacuum catastrophe: An elementary exposition of the cosmological constant problem , author=. American Journal of Physics , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  51. [59]

    The European Physical Journal C , volume=

    Search for the f (R, T) gravity functional form via gaussian processes , author=. The European Physical Journal C , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  52. [60]

    Physics Reports , volume=

    Stellar structure models in modified theories of gravity: Lessons and challenges , author=. Physics Reports , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  53. [61]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , volume=

    Further stable neutron star models from f (R) gravity , author=. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  54. [62]

    General Relativity and Gravitation , volume=

    f (R) gravity constrained by PPN parameters and stochastic background of gravitational waves , author=. General Relativity and Gravitation , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  55. [63]

    The European Physical Journal C , volume=

    Wormholes in exponential f (R, T) gravity , author=. The European Physical Journal C , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  56. [64]

    The European Physical Journal C , volume=

    f (R, L m) gravity , author=. The European Physical Journal C , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  57. [65]

    The European Physical Journal C , volume=

    Generalizing the coupling between geometry and matter: f R, L m, T gravity , author=. The European Physical Journal C , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  58. [66]

    Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck , author=

    Planck 2018 results-I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2018

  59. [67]

    Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology , volume=

    f (R, T) gravity , author=. Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  60. [68]

    ke-2 , author=

    Astronomy: The Solar System and Beyond, ed. ke-2 , author=. New York: Brooke/Cole Cencage Learning , year=

  61. [69]

    Physics Letters B , volume=

    Merging matter and geometry in the same Lagrangian , author=. Physics Letters B , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  62. [70]

    Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics , volume=

    Heavy baryons in compact stars , author=. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  63. [71]

    Soviet Astronomy, Vol

    The degenerate superdense gas of elementary particles , author=. Soviet Astronomy, Vol. 4, p. 187 , volume=

  64. [72]

    2012 , publisher=

    Compact stars: Nuclear physics, particle physics and general relativity , author=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  65. [73]

    Weber, Fridolin , journal=. Introdu

  66. [74]

    DIRAC 1928B , author=. Proc. Roy. Soc , volume=

  67. [75]

    Nuclear hydrodynamics in a relativistic mean field theory , author=. Ann. Phys , volume=

  68. [76]

    Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics , volume=

    Pulsars as astrophysical laboratories for nuclear and particle physics , author=. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  69. [77]

    At The Frontier of Particle Physics: Handbook of QCD (In 3 Volumes) , pages=

    The condensed matter physics of QCD , author=. At The Frontier of Particle Physics: Handbook of QCD (In 3 Volumes) , pages=. 2001 , publisher=

    2001

  70. [78]

    Strange matter , author=. Phys. Rev. D , volume=

  71. [79]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    Collapsed nuclei , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 1971 , publisher=

    1971

  72. [80]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    Cosmic separation of phases , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 1984 , publisher=

    1984

  73. [81]

    Tokyo, INS),(1979); H

    336 (Tokyo: Univ. Tokyo, INS),(1979); H. Terezawa , author=. J. Phys. Soc. Japan , volume=

    1979

  74. [82]

    Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics , volume=

    Strange quark matter and compact stars , author=. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  75. [83]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Tidal deformabilities and radii of neutron stars from the observation of GW170817 , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  76. [84]

    Chinese Physics B , volume=

    Properties of hyperon stars rotating at Keplerian frequency , author=. Chinese Physics B , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  77. [85]

    Journal of Physics: Conference Series , volume=

    Magnetized deformation of neutron stars , author=. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , volume=. 2018 , organization=

    2018

  78. [86]

    Astrophysics , volume=

    Hypothesis concerning quark stars , author=. Astrophysics , volume=. 1965 , publisher=

    1965

  79. [87]

    Progress of Theoretical Physics , volume=

    Hydrostatic equilibrium of hypothetical quark stars , author=. Progress of Theoretical Physics , volume=. 1970 , publisher=

    1970

  80. [88]

    16th Int. Conf. on High Energy Physics, Chicago (1972) H. Fritzsch, M. Gell-Mann and H. Leutwyler , author=. Phys. Lett. B , volume=

    1972

  81. [89]

    1922 , publisher=

    Friedman, Alexander , journal=. 1922 , publisher=

    1922

  82. [90]

    Un Univers homog

    Lema. Un Univers homog. Annales de la Soci

  83. [91]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    Asteroseismology: Radial oscillations of neutron stars with realistic equation of state , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  84. [92]

    Oscillations in neutron stars , author=

  85. [93]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    Radial oscillations of relativistic stars , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    2001

  86. [94]

    Reviews of modern physics , volume=

    The cosmological constant problem , author=. Reviews of modern physics , volume=. 1989 , publisher=

    1989

  87. [95]

    Physics reports , volume=

    Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints , author=. Physics reports , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  88. [96]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid standards provide a 1\ author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  89. [97]

    Physics Reports , volume=

    Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: from F (R) theory to Lorentz non-invariant models , author=. Physics Reports , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  90. [98]

    A&A , volume=

    Planck 2018 results , author=. A&A , volume=

    2018

  91. [99]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters , volume=

    Probing strange stars with advanced gravitational wave detectors , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  92. [100]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Dynamical instability of gaseous masses approaching the Schwarzschild limit in general relativity , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 1964 , publisher=

    1964

  93. [101]

    A determination of the deflection of light by the Sun's gravitational field, from observations made at the total eclipse of May 29, 1919 , author=

    IX. A determination of the deflection of light by the Sun's gravitational field, from observations made at the total eclipse of May 29, 1919 , author=. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Characte...

    1919

  94. [102]

    Physical Review C , volume=

    Effect of the symmetry energy on the secondary component of GW190814 as a neutron star , author=. Physical Review C , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  95. [103]

    Galaxies , volume=

    Radial oscillations in neutron stars from unified hadronic and quarkyonic equation of states , author=. Galaxies , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  96. [104]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , volume=

    Supernova mechanisms , author=. Reviews of Modern Physics , volume=. 1990 , publisher=

    1990

  97. [105]

    Physics Reports , volume=

    Theory of core-collapse supernovae , author=. Physics Reports , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  98. [106]

    2007 , publisher=

    Neutron stars 1 , author=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  99. [107]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , volume=

    Equations of state for supernovae and compact stars , author=. Reviews of Modern Physics , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  100. [108]

    Astrophysics and Space Science , volume=

    The equilibrium configurations of neutron stars in the optimized f (R, T) gravity , author=. Astrophysics and Space Science , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  101. [109]

    International Journal of Theoretical Physics , volume=

    Deformed Compact Objects , author=. International Journal of Theoretical Physics , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  102. [110]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , volume=

    Stellar equilibrium configurations of compact stars in f (R, T) theory of gravity , author=. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  103. [111]

    Physical Review C , volume=

    Quark deconfinement in high-mass neutron stars , author=. Physical Review C , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  104. [112]

    2017 , publisher=

    An introduction to modern astrophysics , author=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  105. [113]

    1983 , publisher=

    Black holes, white dwarfs and neutron stars: the physics of compact objects , author=. 1983 , publisher=

    1983

  106. [114]

    Physics Reports , volume=

    Nuclear matter and its role in supernovae, neutron stars and compact object binary mergers , author=. Physics Reports , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  107. [115]

    European journal of physics , volume=

    Compact stars for undergraduates , author=. European journal of physics , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  108. [116]

    Living Reviews in relativity , volume=

    Physics of neutron star crusts , author=. Living Reviews in relativity , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  109. [117]

    Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B , volume=

    Physical mechanism of core-collapse supernovae that neutrinos drive , author=. Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  110. [118]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    Constraints on maximum neutron star mass from protoneutron star evolution , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  111. [119]

    General Relativity and Gravitation , volume=

    Neutron stars , author=. General Relativity and Gravitation , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  112. [120]

    Physics Letters B , volume=

    Do Delta baryons play a role in neutron stars? , author=. Physics Letters B , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  113. [121]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Structure of matter below nuclear saturation density , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 1983 , publisher=

    1983

  114. [122]

    Recent Progress in Many-Body Theories: Volume 3 , pages=

    Relativistic nuclear many-body theory , author=. Recent Progress in Many-Body Theories: Volume 3 , pages=. 1992 , publisher=

    1992

  115. [123]

    2012 , publisher=

    Quantum theory of many-particle systems , author=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  116. [124]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , volume=

    Elements of the Brueckner-Goldstone theory of nuclear matter , author=. Reviews of Modern Physics , volume=. 1967 , publisher=

    1967

  117. [125]

    1982 , institution=

    Relativistic mean field model of nuclear matter , author=. 1982 , institution=

    1982

  118. [126]

    Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics , volume=

    Relativistic mean field theory in finite nuclei , author=. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics , volume=. 1996 , publisher=

    1996

  119. [127]

    Neutron star cooling , author=. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  120. [128]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Direct URCA process in neutron stars , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 1991 , publisher=

    1991

  121. [129]

    Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol

    Neutrino emissivities of neutron stars , author=. Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol. 232, Sept. 1, 1979, p. 541-557. , volume=

    1979

  122. [130]

    The Physics and Astrophysics of Neutron Stars , pages=

    Superfluidity and superconductivity in neutron stars , author=. The Physics and Astrophysics of Neutron Stars , pages=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  123. [131]

    Physical Review , volume=

    On massive neutron cores , author=. Physical Review , volume=. 1939 , publisher=

    1939

  124. [132]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    The radius of PSR J0740+ 6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton data , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  125. [133]

    Astrophysical Journal, Vol

    Anisotropic spheres in general relativity , author=. Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 188, p. 657 (1974) , volume=

    1974

  126. [134]

    Living Reviews in Relativity , volume=

    Rotating stars in relativity , author=. Living Reviews in Relativity , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  127. [135]

    Space telescopes and instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to gamma ray , volume=

    The neutron star interior composition explorer (NICER): design and development , author=. Space telescopes and instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to gamma ray , volume=. 2016 , organization=

    2016

  128. [136]

    2014 , month = aug, note =

    Lam, Anson , title =. 2014 , month = aug, note =

    2014

  129. [137]

    and Orsaria, Milva G

    Weber, Fridolin and Contrera, Gustavo A. and Orsaria, Milva G. and Spinella, William and Zubairi, Omair , title =. Modern Physics Letters A , volume =. 2014 , eprint =

    2014

  130. [138]

    Neutron Stars and Pulsars , pages=

    Neutron star interiors and the equation of state of superdense matter , author=. Neutron Stars and Pulsars , pages=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  131. [139]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    Rethinking the link between matter and geometry , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  132. [140]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    Compact objects in entangled relativity , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  133. [141]

    2004 , publisher=

    A relativist's toolkit: the mathematics of black-hole mechanics , author=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  134. [142]

    Astronomische Nachrichten , volume=

    Solutions of Einstein's field equation modified for the cosmological constant , author=. Astronomische Nachrichten , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  135. [143]

    Menezes, DP and Marquez, KD and da Silva, TJN , journal=. Introdu

  136. [144]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Maximum mass of a neutron star , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 1974 , publisher=

    1974

  137. [145]

    , author=

    General Relativistic Polytropic Fluid Spheres. , author=. Astrophysical Journal, vol. 140, p. 434 , volume=

  138. [146]

    International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series , volume=

    Hybrid stars in the framework of njl models , author=. International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series , volume=. 2017 , organization=

    2017

  139. [147]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=

    Gravitational waves from neutron-star mountains , author=. Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  140. [148]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume=

    Masses, radii, and the equation of state of neutron stars , author=. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  141. [149]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    The neutron star mass--radius relation and the equation of state of dense matter , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  142. [150]

    Physical Review , volume=

    Static solutions of Einstein's field equations for spheres of fluid , author=. Physical Review , volume=. 1939 , publisher=

    1939

  143. [151]

    The European Physical Journal Plus , volume=

    Deformed compact objects in modified gravity , author=. The European Physical Journal Plus , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  144. [152]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    GW170817: observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  145. [153]

    GW190425: Observation of a compact binary coalescence with total 3.4\,M_

    Abbott, Benjamin P and Abbott, Robert and Abbott, TD and Abraham, S and Acernese, Fausto and Ackley, K and Adams, C and Adhikari, RX and Adya, VB and Affeldt, Christoph and others , journal=. GW190425: Observation of a compact binary coalescence with total 3.4\,M_. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  146. [154]

    Pulsar mass measurements and tests of general relativity , author=

  147. [155]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    Refined mass and geometric measurements of the high-mass PSR J0740+ 6620 , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  148. [156]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Non-linear Lagrangians and cosmological theory , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 1970 , publisher=

    1970

  149. [157]

    Physics Letters B , volume=

    A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity , author=. Physics Letters B , volume=. 1980 , publisher=

    1980

Pith tools

Reviewed July 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.