Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 86 references

Chiral anomaly from (anomalous) spin hydrodynamics

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The four-dimensional chiral anomaly is a ten-dimensional gravitational anomaly in the spin hydrodynamics of black D3-branes.

desk verdict A genuinely new holographic dictionary between spinning D3-brane hydrodynamics and anomalous chiral fluids, but the key anomaly equation is posited rather than derived; still worth serious refereeing as a construction. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.01843 v1 pith:SEPYGFXJ submitted 2025-05-03 hep-th hep-phnucl-th

Jay Armas , Giorgos Batzios This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thhep-phnucl-th
keywords chiralanomalyspinhydrodynamicsD3-branesN=4supersymmetricYang-MillstheoryR-currentgravitationalanomaloustransportholography
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that the long-wavelength fluctuations of spinning D3-branes are governed by a transverse spin hydrodynamics, and that the spin current of this fluid is the holographic image of the R-current of strongly coupled $\mathcal{N}=4$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory. On this dictionary, the conservation law of the spin current in ten dimensions contains an anomalous term built from the outer curvature, which is a gravitational anomaly from the ten-dimensional point of view. Translated through the holographic map, this anomalous spin conservation becomes the standard chiral-anomaly equation for the four-dimensional R-current. The paper thereby connects two areas usually treated separately, chiral transport and spin hydrodynamics, within a single ten-dimensional geometric description.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the spin current $S^a_{ij} = \ell s_{ij} u^a$, with $s_{ij}$ the spin density on the transverse space, and the outer curvature $\Omega^{ab}_{ij}$ built from the spin connection $\omega_{aij}$. The anomalous conservation law $\tilde\nabla_a S^a_{ij} = \frac{\ell^3}{8} C_{ijklmn} \epsilon^{abcd} \Omega^{ab}_{kl} \Omega^{cd}_{mn}$ takes the role of the chiral anomaly in ten dimensions. The holographic dictionary $S^a_{ij} \to \ell J^A_a$ and $2\ell \Omega^{ab}_{ij} \to F^A_{ab}$ converts this geometric equation into the familiar four-dimensional chiral anomaly.

What would settle it

Compute the first-order corrected spin current directly from the near-horizon geometry of a spinning D3-brane and check whether it equals $\ell$ times the R-current, with the anomaly coefficient matching the known $U(1)^3$ anomaly of $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM; any mismatch in the curvature-squared term would falsify the central identification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the four-dimensional chiral anomaly of $\mathcal{N}=4$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory can be read as a ten-dimensional gravitational anomaly: in the near-horizon limit, the spinning D3-brane (a three-dimensional brane in type IIB string theory) is described by an anomalous spinning fluid whose spin current $S^a_{ij}$ is mapped to $\ell J^A_a$ (the R-current) and whose outer curvature $\Omega^{ab}_{ij}$ is mapped to the R-current field strength $F^A_{ab}$. Substituting these identifications into the ten-dimensional anomalous conservation law, the paper obtains the standard four-dimensional conservation laws of a chiral fluid. The anomaly term involves the outer curvature squared with an epsilon symbol and is purely geometric, hence gravitational in origin.

Load-bearing premise

The dictionary identifying the spin current with the R-current and the outer curvature with the gauge field strength is assumed as a 'natural identification' rather than proven; if it fails at first order in the gradient expansion, the geometric interpretation of the chiral anomaly does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Imposing the dictionary on the ten-dimensional equations reproduces the known hydrodynamics of R-charged black holes, including the anomaly-induced chiral transport coefficients.
  • The ten-dimensional anomaly coefficients fix the chiral vortical and chiral spin effects, so four-dimensional chiral transport is determined by the spin geometry of the brane.
  • The ten-dimensional formulation yields the spin-diffusion instability of $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM at finite density directly in ten dimensions, matching the known five-dimensional result.
  • The geometric realization is an artifact of the Kaluza-Klein reduction: in the full ten-dimensional string theory with five-form flux the anomaly is absent, replaced by a coupling between the spin current and the higher-form D3-brane charge.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the dictionary survives at higher orders in the gradient expansion, chiral transport coefficients could be computed directly from ten-dimensional curvature couplings for unequal angular momenta, a regime where the Kaluza-Klein ansatz is less restrictive.
  • The appearance of a gravitational-anomaly form suggests that any curved transverse space may induce chiral-like spin transport, a phenomenon that could be studied in condensed matter analogues with synthetic gauge fields.
  • The suggested link between transverse and intrinsic spin currents may offer a holographic shortcut for extracting spin transport coefficients relevant to heavy-ion phenomenology, because transverse spin is directly accessible from the brane geometry.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a ten-dimensional origin for the four-dimensional chiral anomaly in holographic spin hydrodynamics. It uses blackfold technology to write an ideal-order transverse spin hydrodynamic theory for spinning D3 branes (Eqs. 4-10), identifies the spin current with the SO(6) R-current through a natural dictionary, postulates an anomalous conservation law (Eq. 11) whose right-hand side is a gravitational anomaly built from the outer curvature, derives the resulting first-order transport corrections (Eq. 12), and translates them into the standard 4d anomalous chiral fluid. The paper closes by cautioning that the gravitational anomaly is an artifact of a KK ansatz and by outlining a future derivation through five-form-flux coupling (Eq. 14).

Significance. If fully established, the proposed duality would give a ten-dimensional geometric interpretation of the R-current anomaly and would connect transverse spin hydrodynamics to heavy-ion physics. The paper is valuable for drawing this connection and for formulating transverse spin hydrodynamics with the correct gradient ordering; the construction of the ideal-order theory and the matching of thermodynamic identities in Appendix B are careful and clearly presented. The central gap is that the anomalous sector is assumed rather than derived, so the strongest version of the title's claim is not yet supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Anomalous spin hydrodynamics; Eq. (11), Eq. (A.13)] Eq. (11) is not derived from the D3-brane setup: the right-hand side is written with an undetermined constant matrix C_{ijklmn}, and Eq. (A.13) in the supplementary material simply defines f_{[ij]} by the same expression. The paper therefore assumes the anomaly rather than computing it from the coupling to the five-form flux. A derivation of (11) from the D3-brane conservation laws, or at least a numerical matching of the single component C=C_{123456} to the known anomaly coefficient of N=4 SYM, is needed before the claim that the chiral anomaly arises from 10d spin hydrodynamics is established. As a consequence, the transport coefficients in Eq. (B.15) contain a free parameter and cannot be independently checked against the known 5d results.
  2. [Spin current as the holographic dual of the R-current] The dictionary S^{a}_{ij}→ℓ J^{A}_{a} and 2ℓ Ω^{ab}_{ij}→F^{A}_{ab} is presented as a natural identification and is only tested at the level of equilibrium charges. Because this dictionary is the only bridge that turns Eq. (11) into the standard 4d anomaly equation, the mapping of the 10d gravitational anomaly to the 4d chiral anomaly is effectively a translation of the known anomaly into 10d variables. The authors should either prove the dictionary order by order from the KK reduction or state explicitly its regime of validity.
  3. [Discussion and Anomalous spin hydrodynamics] The manuscript itself notes that the 10d gravitational anomaly is 'merely an artifact of imposing a specific dimensional reduction ansatz, and in the full 10d string theory picture this anomaly is absent.' This caveat is in tension with the abstract's unconditional statement that the paper provides a geometric interpretation of the R-current anomaly in terms of a 10d gravitational anomaly. The alternative route via Eq. (14) is sketched but not carried out, so the paper's more ambitious claim remains a proposal rather than a result.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Effective theory and equations of motion; Eq. (4)] The index placement in Ω^{ba}_{ij} in Eq. (4) is not uniform with the definition Ω^{ab}_{ij} in Eq. (A.4); please make the convention consistent.
  2. [Appendix A, Eq. (A.13)] The notation f_{[ij]} is not defined in the main text; please explicitly introduce the antisymmetrization bracket and the prefactor -ℓ^3/8 when the forcing term is first written down.
  3. [Appendix B, Eqs. (B.10)-(B.12)] In the equal-spinning case the function is called both f(µ) and f_3(µ); please use a single name and define all variables appearing in the final expression.
  4. [Eq. (14)] The typesetting of Eq. (14) with J^{μ1...μ4}_{[i} F_{j]μ1...μ4} should be corrected; the intended antisymmetrization is clear, but the formula as printed is hard to parse.
  5. [Appendix B, text near Eq. (B.15)] The relation r^3_+ = r^2_0 r_H is stated without introducing r_+; please define this notation and clarify which 5d horizon scale it refers to.
  6. [Effective theory and equations of motion] There is a typo 'convservation' in the sentence describing the conservation laws; please correct it.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The chiral-anomaly claim is a dictionary-level translation of a posited anomalous spin-conservation equation; the 4d anomaly is an input, not a derived 10d prediction.

  1. renaming known result [Section 'Anomalous spin hydrodynamics', dictionary step after Eq. (11)]
    "Starting from the first equation in (4) and (11) in the equally spinning case, and using the holographic relations Saij → ℓJAa, 2ℓΩabij → FAab where FAab are the field strengths of the 4d theory, we arrive at the standard conservation laws of a theory with a chiral anomaly [14]."

    The 4d anomaly equation is obtained purely by substituting the dictionary into the already-anomalous 10d equation (11). Since (11) is posited with an undetermined matrix C and is not derived from the D3-brane/flux coupling, the claimed 'geometrization' is a renaming of the known chiral anomaly in 10d variables rather than a derivation from spin hydrodynamics.

  2. other [Section 'Anomalous spin hydrodynamics', Eq. (11); Supplementary Eq. (A.13)]
    "In this limit, the presence of fluxes leads to anomalous contributions to the spin conservation equation (4) [14, 38], such that from a 10d perspective ∇̃aSaij = ℓ3/8 Cijklmn ǫabcdΩabklΩcdmn, (11) where Cijklmn is a constant matrix of anomaly coefficients..."

    Eq. (11) is the entire anomalous input of the paper, but C is never computed from the ten-dimensional five-form coupling of Eq. (14). In the supplementary, the forcing is merely set equal to the same C-dependent expression, f[ij] = −ℓ3 Cijklmn ǫabcdΩabklΩcdmn/8, so the anomaly coefficient remains a free parameter. The chiral anomaly is therefore assumed, not derived.

1 more flagged steps
  1. renaming known result [Supplementary Material, Appendix B, 'Derivative corrections in the near-horizon limit']
    "Hydrodynamic corrections to the currents of equal spinning D3 branes were found in [12–14] and explicitly written down fully in [62] in 5d. Here we uplift these results to 10d following the prescription described in the main text."

    The transport coefficients ξ, ξS, and D in (B.15) are imported from the 5d R-charged black-brane computation of [62] and re-expressed in 10d variables using the same dictionary. The subsequent agreement with 4d chiral transport is thus a restatement of the known 5d holographic result, not an independent prediction of the new 10d spin-hydrodynamic theory.

full rationale

The paper's ideal-order transverse spin hydrodynamics, Eqs. (4)-(10), is derived from a blackfold variational principle and the equilibrium partition function, and that part is self-contained. The circularity is concentrated in the anomalous sector. The central geometric claim rests on Eq. (11), which is posited with a free coefficient matrix C; the paper does not compute C from the D3-brane/flux coupling, and the supplementary merely defines the forcing to be that same C-dependent expression. The dictionary Saij → ℓJAa and 2ℓΩabij → FAab is called 'natural' and assumed, and substituting it into (11) produces the standard 4d chiral anomaly equation by construction. The transport coefficients are then uplifted from the known 5d results of [62], so the match with 4d chiral hydrodynamics is also by construction. The paper itself cautions that the 10d gravitational anomaly is 'merely an artifact of imposing a specific dimensional reduction ansatz, and in the full 10d string theory picture this anomaly is absent,' which is consistent with the anomaly being an input rather than a derived output. No load-bearing self-citation chain was found; the blackfold references are technical support. Overall, the ideal-order framework is independent, but the paper's headline claim—the chiral anomaly arising as a 10d gravitational anomaly—reduces to a dictionary translation of a posited anomalous conservation law, giving partial circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new fundamental particles or forces are introduced. The new objects, such as the transverse spin current S^{aij}, the spin chemical potential μ^{ij}, and the outer curvature Ω^{ab}_{ij}, are effective-theory constructs built from existing geometrical and thermodynamic data. The only genuinely new constant is the anomaly coefficient matrix C, which is listed as a free parameter because it is not derived.

free parameters (1)
  • 10d anomaly coefficient C^{ijklmn} = matched to known 4d anomaly coefficient
    Appears in Eq. (11) as the strength of the anomalous spin non-conservation. It is not derived from string theory in the paper; it is fixed by requiring that the dictionary reproduces the known 4d chiral anomaly of N=4 SYM.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Blackfold/worldvolume effective theory is valid for strongly spinning D3-branes, including the gradient expansion and extraction of currents from the asymptotic metric.
    Used throughout to derive the transport equations (4) from the D3-brane metric; relies on prior work by the authors and collaborators [16,21,22].
  • domain assumption The near-horizon limit of spinning D3-branes is dual to the hydrodynamic regime of N=4 SYM (holographic duality).
    Assumed to identify the spin current with the R-current and to translate 10d equations into 4d Ward identities; invoked in the sections 'Spin current as the holographic dual of the R-current' and 'Anomalous spin hydrodynamics'.
  • domain assumption The specific KK ansatz of Cvetic et al. [37] embeds the 5d Einstein-Maxwell-Chern-Simons theory in 10d for equally spinning D3-branes.
    Used to relate 10d metric components to 4d gauge fields and to justify the absence of the five-form flux in (11).
  • ad hoc to paper The effect of the five-form flux on the brane fluid can be modeled by the forcing function f^μ with monopole/dipole decomposition, and the anomalous term is set by f_[ij] = -(ℓ^3/8) C ε Ω Ω.
    This is inserted by hand in Appendix A; it is the key load-bearing assumption for the anomalous sector and is not derived from the D3-brane action.
  • ad hoc to paper The gradient ordering ℓ ~ O(∂^{-1}) keeps monopole and dipole contributions at the same order.
    Needed for the spin current to contribute at ideal order; stated in the section 'Effective theory and equations of motion'. Well-motivated but a choice.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chiral anomaly from (anomalous) spin hydrodynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SEPYGFXJ

@misc{pith2026250501843,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chiral anomaly from (anomalous) spin hydrodynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SEPYGFXJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.01843}
}
abstract

We show that the low energy fluctuations of spinning black Dp branes are described by a theory of spin hydrodynamics on a spacetime $\mathbb{M}_{p+1}\times \mathbb{T}^{n+2}$ in which the fluid is flowing on $\mathbb{M}_{p+1}$ and spinning on $\mathbb{T}^{n+2}$. Focusing on the hydrodynamic regime of $\mathcal{N}=4$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory, we provide a geometric interpretation of the R-current anomaly in terms of a gravitational anomaly from the ten-dimensional point of view. This follows from the holographic duality between a spinning fluid in ten dimensions and an anomalous chiral fluid in four dimensions. We comment on the relations between the theory of spin hydrodynamics introduced here and other theories of spin hydrodynamics in the context of heavy-ion collisions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The stress tensor (

    stand for ad- ditional quadrupole or higher corrections to the stress tensor which we will not deal with here. The stress tensor (

  2. [2]

    Contrary to cases in which dipole terms in ( 1) are viewed as perturbations, here we are interested in ge- ometries in which monopole and dipole terms in (

    can be extracted from the met- ric of a black Dp brane by expanding it in powers of u, in particular gµν = ηµν + h(M) µν + h(D) µν + O(un+2) where h(M) µν stands for the monopole contribution to the metric of order un and h(D) µν for the dipole contribution of order un+1. Contrary to cases in which dipole terms in ( 1) are viewed as perturbations, here we...

  3. [3]

    We can achieve this by rescal- ing u → λu as well as h(D) µν → h(D) µν /λ, and approaching the asymptotic region by sending λ → 0 while keeping u fixed

    are taken to be of equal order. We can achieve this by rescal- ing u → λu as well as h(D) µν → h(D) µν /λ, and approaching the asymptotic region by sending λ → 0 while keeping u fixed. We then extract the monopole and dipole contri- butions to the stress tensor using linearised gravity ∇2¯h(M) ab = −16πGTabˆδ(r) , ∇2¯h(D) ai = 8πGSai j∂j ˆδ(r) , (2) where ...

  4. [4]

    The first equation in ( 4) describes the non-conservation of the monopole/worldvolume stress tensor T ab due to a spin-curvature coupling

    are the equations of transverse spin hydrodynamics. The first equation in ( 4) describes the non-conservation of the monopole/worldvolume stress tensor T ab due to a spin-curvature coupling. Backgrounds that are rotating in Tn+2 have a non-trivial outer curvature, thereby lead- ing to a non-vanishing coupling with the spin current. The second equation in (

  5. [5]

    states that the spin current is conserved ensuring that transverse angular momentum charges are well defined [ 24]. Eqs. ( 4) can be written in the more common form of spin hydrodynamics as in [ 25– 27], which we show in the supplementary material [28]. The effective theory ( 4) can be derived from an ac- tion principle on Mp+1 where the stress tensor and s...

  6. [6]

    We mention that the effective theory ( 5) can be seen as a non-abelian gauge theory for the spin connection ωaij

    since δωaij = − ˜∇aM ij. We mention that the effective theory ( 5) can be seen as a non-abelian gauge theory for the spin connection ωaij. As we are formulating a gradient expansion, we must assign a gradient ordering to each operator and source in the theory. Here we are considering the situation in which the monopole stress tensor and the spin current ar...

  7. [7]

    is a special case of a more general theory of spin hydrodynamics described by eqs. ( 4). Degrees of freedom and conserved charges— The starting point of any hydrodynamic theory, whenever possible, is to construct the equilibrium partition function [ 22, 34– 36] from which the equilibrium currents can be derived. This can be done by looking at the hydrosta...

    work page

  8. [8]

    under tangential diffeomorphisms ξa and rotations M ij requires the transformation proper- ties for the equilibrium parameters δBK a = £ ξ K a and δBΛ ij K = ξa ˜∇aΛ ij K − K a ˜∇aM ij where B = ( ξa, M ij). This allows us to introduce the thermal twist vector βa = ua/T ∼ O (1) where ua = K a/|K| is the unit nor- malised fluid velocity uaua = −1 with |K| th...

    work page

Show all 86 references
  1. [9]

    Compar- ison with ( 1) one identifies sij = J Aǫij A for the spinning D3 brane

    together with the thermodynamic identities ε + P = T s + sijµij , dP = sdT + sijdµij , (9) where s = ∂P/∂T is the entropy density and sij = ∂P/∂µ ij the spin density, as well as the spin current Saij = ℓsijua , (10) which satisfies Saij ∼ O (∂− 1) by construction. Compar- ison ...

  2. [10]

    also match those of the spinning D3 brane (see supplementary ma- terial) which confirm that the gradient ordering of (

  3. [11]

    is appropriate since the angular momenta of spinning Dp branes is not a perturbative quantity in gravity. The common lore of hydrodynamics is to promote the equilib- rium parameters K a and Λ ij K to slowly varying functions out of equilibrium, allowing us to identify T, µij, ...

  4. [12]

    have two sets of conserved charges that can be obtained by integrating the conserved currents T a = T abkb + Saijniµ njν ∇ν kµ and Saij over a spatial slice of Mp+1. The current T a gives rise to a total conserved energy if the Killing vector kµ = ka∂aX µ is the generator of t...

  5. [13]

    In this case, for which transverse spacelike vector fields are available, the spin charges Sij have the physical interpretation of (transverse) angular momenta in Tn+2

    by inte- grating the conserved current Tµν ζij ν over a spatial slice [22, 23, 30]. In this case, for which transverse spacelike vector fields are available, the spin charges Sij have the physical interpretation of (transverse) angular momenta in Tn+2. Spin current as the holog...

  6. [14]

    (see supplementary ma- terial). Here we focus on the decoupling limit of the D3 brane within the KK ansatz of [ 37] for which both hy- drodynamic corrections and corrections due to the pres- ence of fluxes arise, in particular f µ = F µν 1...ν 4Jν 1...ν 4/4! where F µν 1...ν 4 ...

  7. [15]

    The relation between the anomaly term and the forcing function f µ is given in the supplementary material

    [ 14, 38], such that from a 10d perspective ˜∇aSa ij = ℓ3 8 Cijklmn ǫabcdΩ ab klΩ cd mn , (11) where Cijklmn is a constant matrix of anomaly coeffi- cients, anti-symmetric in each pair ( i, j), (k, l), (m, n) and symmetric under exchange of pairs, while ǫabcd is the Levi-Civita ...

  8. [16]

    As with the usual chiral anomaly, the anomalous term in the conservation law (

    because the KK ansatz [ 37] for the flux is determined in terms of 10d metric components and its derivatives, effectively gener- ating the anomaly. As with the usual chiral anomaly, the anomalous term in the conservation law (

  9. [17]

    [ 36, 39]) in which the cur- rents in ( 5) should now be viewed as covariant currents acquiring modifications due to inflow while the partition function (

    is generated using anomaly inflow (see e.g. [ 36, 39]) in which the cur- rents in ( 5) should now be viewed as covariant currents acquiring modifications due to inflow while the partition function (

  10. [18]

    receives non-gauge invariant corrections (see e.g. [ 40]). The form of the RHS of ( 11), modifying the conser- vation law for Tµν , makes it clear that it is a gravita- tional anomaly. Not only is Ω ab kl purely geometric, it is also given in terms of components of the Riemann...

  11. [19]

    Parametrizing the correc- tions to the currents as T ab = (ε + P )uaub + P γab + T ab and Saij = ℓsijua + Σ aij, and using the first equation in (

    at first order, it is straightforward to find the corrected constitutive equations by requiring the second law of thermodynamics ∇aSa ≥ 0, where Sa = P βa −T abβb −ℓ− 1µijSaij/T +Sa nc is the entropy current and Sa nc the non-canonical contri- bution to the entropy current. Para...

  12. [20]

    magnetic

    as well as ( 11) we can determine the corrections to the currents in the Landau frame ( ubT ab = uaΣ aij = 0) to be T ab = − ησab − ζθP ab + O(∂2) Σ aij = − ℓDijkl P ab ( ℓβcΩ cb kl + ˜∇b ( µkl T )) + ℓξij̟a + ℓ2ξS ijkl Bakl + O(∂) , (12) where η, ζ, Dijkl ≥ 0 are the shear vi...

  13. [21]

    and ( 11) 5 in the equally spinning case, and using the holographic relations Sa ij → ℓJ A a , 2 ℓΩ ab ij → F A ab where F A ab are the field strengths of the 4d theory, we arrive at the standard conservation laws of a theory with a chiral anomaly [ 14]. Discussion— Using spinn...

  14. [22]

    In the context of N = 4 SYM, we showed that the anomalous R-current in 4d holography corresponds to an anomalous spin cur- rent in 10d

    of anomalous spinning fluids in 10d. In the context of N = 4 SYM, we showed that the anomalous R-current in 4d holography corresponds to an anomalous spin cur- rent in 10d. This point of view is valuable for studying instabilities of Dp-branes. For instance, using the ex- act c...

  15. [23]

    More broadly, we uncovered a connection between two seem- ingly different aspects of the quark-gluon plasma: the chiral anomaly and spin degrees of freedom

    of the D3 brane given in the supplementary material, it is straightforward to perform a linearized analysis and find, directly in 10d, the hydrodynamic instability in the spin diffusion modes recently uncovered in [ 42] from a 5d perspective. More broadly, we uncovered a connect...

  16. [24]

    Huang, Electromagnetic fields and anoma- lous transports in heavy-ion collisions — A ped- agogical review, Rept

    X.-G. Huang, Electromagnetic fields and anoma- lous transports in heavy-ion collisions — A ped- agogical review, Rept. Prog. Phys. 79, 076302 (2016) , arXiv:1509.04073 [nucl-th]

    2016 arXiv

  17. [25]

    D. E. Kharzeev, J. Liao, and P. Tribedy, Chiral Magnetic Effect in Heavy Ion Collisions: The Present and Future, (2024), arXiv:2405.05427 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Becattini, M

    F. Becattini, M. Buzzegoli, T. Niida, S. Pu, A.-H. Tang, and Q. Wang, Spin polarization in relativistic heavy- ion collisions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 33, 2430006 (2024) , arXiv:2402.04540 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Florkowski, Spin hydrodynamics (2024) arXiv:2411.19673 [hep-ph]

    W. Florkowski, Spin hydrodynamics (2024) arXiv:2411.19673 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    S. L. Adler, Axial-vector vertex in spinor electrodynam- ics, Phys. Rev. 177, 2426 (1969)

    1969

  21. [29]

    J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw, A pcac puzzle: π 0 → γγ in the σ -model, 6 Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970) 60, 47 (1969)

    1969

  22. [30]

    N. P. Ong and S. Liang, Experimental signatures of the chiral anomaly in dirac–weyl semimetals, Nature Reviews Physics 3, 394 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Takahashi, M

    R. Takahashi, M. Matsuo, M. Ono, K. Harii, H. Chudo, S. Okayasu, J. Ieda, S. Takahashi, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Spin hydrodynamic gener- ation, Nature Physics 12, 52 (2016)

    2016

  24. [32]

    However, since we want to highlight the string theory origin of these chiral fluids we consider spinning fluids in ten spacetime dimensions

    In fact this duality is present between anomalous chiral fluids in four spacetime dimensions and spinning fluids in six spacetime dimensions. However, since we want to highlight the string theory origin of these chiral fluids we consider spinning fluids in ten spacetime dimensions

  25. [33]

    Landsteiner, Notes on Anomaly Induced Transport, Acta Phys

    K. Landsteiner, Notes on Anomaly Induced Transport, Acta Phys. Polon. B 47, 2617 (2016) , arXiv:1610.04413 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holog- raphy, Adv

    E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holog- raphy, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998) , arXiv:hep-th/9802150

    1998 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Erdmenger, M

    J. Erdmenger, M. Haack, M. Kaminski, and A. Yarom, Fluid dynamics of R-charged black holes, JHEP 01, 055 , arXiv:0809.2488 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Banerjee, J

    N. Banerjee, J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Dutta, R. Loganayagam, and P. Surowka, Hydro- dynamics from charged black branes, JHEP 01, 094 , arXiv:0809.2596 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    D. T. Son and P. Surowka, Hydrodynamics with Tri- angle Anomalies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 191601 (2009) , arXiv:0906.5044 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Cvetic and S

    M. Cvetic and S. S. Gubser, Phases of r-charged black holes, spinning branes and strongly coupled gauge theories, Journal of High Energy Physics 1999, 024–024 (1999)

    1999

  31. [39]

    Armas, J

    J. Armas, J. Camps, T. Harmark, and N. A. Obers, The Young Modulus of Black Strings and the Fine Structure of Blackfolds, JHEP 02, 110 , arXiv:1110.4835 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Harmark and N

    T. Harmark and N. A. Obers, Thermodynamics of spinning branes and their dual field theories, Journal of High Energy Physics 2000, 008–008 (2000)

    2000

  33. [41]

    Emparan, T

    R. Emparan, T. Harmark, V. Niarchos, and N. A. Obers, Blackfolds in Supergravity and String Theory, JHEP 08, 154 , arXiv:1106.4428 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Emparan, T

    R. Emparan, T. Harmark, V. Niarchos, and N. A. Obers, World-Volume Effective Theory for Higher-Dimensional Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 191301 (2009) , arXiv:0902.0427 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Emparan, T

    R. Emparan, T. Harmark, V. Niarchos, and N. A. Obers, Essentials of Blackfold Dynamics, JHEP 03, 063 , arXiv:0910.1601 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Armas, J

    J. Armas, J. Gath, V. Niarchos, N. A. Obers, and A. V. Pedersen, Forced Fluid Dynamics from Blackfolds in General Supergravity Backgrounds, JHEP 10, 154 , arXiv:1606.09644 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Armas, How Fluids Bend: the Elastic Expan- sion for Higher-Dimensional Black Holes, JHEP 09, 073 , arXiv:1304.7773 [hep-th]

    J. Armas, How Fluids Bend: the Elastic Expan- sion for Higher-Dimensional Black Holes, JHEP 09, 073 , arXiv:1304.7773 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Armas and J

    J. Armas and J. Tarrio, On actions for (en- tangling) surfaces and DCFTs, JHEP 04, 100 , arXiv:1709.06766 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    There is also another equation that in general arises from ∇µ Tµν = 0 describing the transverse dynamics of the brane but it is not relevant for the purposes of this letter so we present it elsewhere

  40. [48]

    A. D. Gallegos, U. Gürsoy, and A. Yarom, Hydrody- namics of spin currents, SciPost Phys. 11, 041 (2021) , arXiv:2101.04759 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Hongo, X.-G

    M. Hongo, X.-G. Huang, M. Kaminski, M. Stephanov, and H.-U. Yee, Relativistic spin hydrodynamics with torsion and linear response theory for spin relaxation, JHEP 11, 150 , arXiv:2107.14231 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    A. D. Gallegos, U. Gursoy, and A. Yarom, Hydro- dynamics, spin currents and torsion, JHEP 05, 139 , arXiv:2203.05044 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    We note that in other formulations of hydrodynamics of spin [ 25–27] there is a Belinfante-Rosenfeld ambiguity in the definition of stress tensor and spin current which does not appear in the formulation presented here because the stress tensor T ab is symmetric

  44. [52]

    Armas, (Non)-Dissipative Hydrodynamics on Embed- ded Surfaces, JHEP 09, 047 , arXiv:1312.0597 [hep-th]

    J. Armas, (Non)-Dissipative Hydrodynamics on Embed- ded Surfaces, JHEP 09, 047 , arXiv:1312.0597 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    Armas and T

    J. Armas and T. Harmark, Constraints on the effec- tive fluid theory of stationary branes, JHEP 10, 063 , arXiv:1406.7813 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  46. [54]

    Armas, T

    J. Armas, T. Harmark, and N. A. Obers, Ex- tremal Black Hole Horizons, JHEP 03, 099 , arXiv:1712.09364 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    Armas, A

    J. Armas, A. Jain, and R. Lier, Approximate symmetries, pseudo-Goldstones, and the second law of thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 108, 086011 (2023) , arXiv:2112.14373 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Armas and A

    J. Armas and A. Jain, Approximate higher-form symmetries, topological defects, and dynamical phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D 109, 045019 (2024) , arXiv:2301.09628 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Jensen, M

    K. Jensen, M. Kaminski, P. Kovtun, R. Meyer, A. Ritz, and A. Yarom, Towards hydrodynamics without an entropy current, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 101601 (2012) , arXiv:1203.3556 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Banerjee, J

    N. Banerjee, J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Jain, S. Minwalla, and T. Sharma, Constraints on Fluid Dynamics from Equilibrium Partition Functions, JHEP 09, 046 , arXiv:1203.3544 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    Jensen, R

    K. Jensen, R. Loganayagam, and A. Yarom, Anomaly inflow and thermal equilibrium, JHEP 05, 134 , arXiv:1310.7024 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    Cvetic/caron.ts1, M

    M. Cvetic/caron.ts1, M. Duff, P. Hoxha, J. T. Liu, H. Lü, J. Lu, R. Martinez-Acosta, C. Pope, H. Sati, and T. Tran, Em- bedding ads black holes in ten and eleven dimensions, Nuclear Physics B 558, 96–126 (1999)

    1999

  53. [61]

    Erdmenger, M

    J. Erdmenger, M. Rangamani, S. Steinfurt, and H. Zeller, Hydrodynamic Regimes of Spinning Black D3-Branes, JHEP 02, 026 , arXiv:1412.0020 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  54. [62]

    Jensen, R

    K. Jensen, R. Loganayagam, and A. Yarom, Ther- modynamics, gravitational anomalies and cones, JHEP 02, 088 , arXiv:1207.5824 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  55. [63]

    Ammon, S

    M. Ammon, S. Grieninger, J. Hernandez, M. Kamin- ski, R. Koirala, J. Leiber, and J. Wu, Chiral hydrody- namics in strong external magnetic fields, JHEP 04, 078 , arXiv:2012.09183 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Neiman and Y

    Y. Neiman and Y. Oz, Relativistic Hydrodynam- ics with General Anomalous Charges, JHEP 03, 023 , arXiv:1011.5107 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  57. [65]

    Gladden, V

    L. Gladden, V. Ivo, P. Kovtun, and A. O. Starinets, In- stability in N = 4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory at finite density, (2024), arXiv:2412.12353 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  58. [66]

    L. F. O. Costa, J. Natário, and M. Zilhao, Space- time dynamics of spinning particles: Exact elec- tromagnetic analogies, Phys. Rev. D 93, 104006 (2016) , 7 arXiv:1207.0470 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  59. [67]

    This idea is similar to the one implemented in [ 56]

  60. [68]

    Armas, J

    J. Armas, J. Gath, A. Jain, and A. V. Pedersen, Dissipative hydrodynamics with higher-form symmetry, JHEP 05, 192 , arXiv:1803.00991 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    M. M. Caldarelli, J. Camps, B. Goutéraux, and K. Sk- enderis, AdS/Ricci-flat correspondence, JHEP 04, 071 , arXiv:1312.7874 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  62. [70]

    Emparan, V

    R. Emparan, V. E. Hubeny, and M. Rangamani, Effec- tive hydrodynamics of black D3-branes, JHEP 06, 035 , arXiv:1303.3563 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  63. [71]

    Di Dato, J

    A. Di Dato, J. Gath, and A. V. Pedersen, Probing the Hydrodynamic Limit of (Super)gravity, JHEP 04, 171 , arXiv:1501.05441 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  64. [72]

    Huang, An introduction to relativistic spin hydro- dynamics, (2024), arXiv:2411.11753 [nucl-th]

    X.-G. Huang, An introduction to relativistic spin hydro- dynamics, (2024), arXiv:2411.11753 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Becattini, V

    F. Becattini, V. Chandra, L. Del Zanna, and E. Grossi, Relativistic distribution function for parti- cles with spin at local thermodynamical equilibrium, Annals Phys. 338, 32 (2013) , arXiv:1303.3431 [nucl-th]

    2013 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Florkowski, B

    W. Florkowski, B. Friman, A. Jaiswal, and E. Speranza, Relativistic fluid dynam- ics with spin, Phys. Rev. C 97, 041901 (2018) , arXiv:1705.00587 [nucl-th]

    2018 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Becattini, M

    F. Becattini, M. Buzzegoli, G. Inghirami, I. Karpenko, and A. Palermo, Local Polarization and Isother- mal Local Equilibrium in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 272302 (2021) , arXiv:2103.14621 [nucl-th]

    2021 arXiv

  68. [76]

    One point of departure with theories with intrinsic spin is that in this formulation with transverse spin, coupling to the sources γ ab and ω aij directly in ( 5) and not to the tangent ∂ aX µ and normal nµ i vectors, does not lead to a relation between the spin chemical poten...

  69. [77]

    Cartwright, D

    C. Cartwright, D. Gallegos, U. Gürsoy, R. Klein, and A. Yarom, A supersymmetric spin current, (2024), arXiv:2408.04399 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Armas, G

    J. Armas, G. Batzios, and J. P. van der Schaar, Holo- graphic duals of the N = 1* gauge theory, JHEP 04, 021 , arXiv:2212.02777 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    Casero, E

    R. Casero, E. Kiritsis, and A. Paredes, Chiral sym- metry breaking as open string tachyon condensation, Nucl. Phys. B 787, 98 (2007) , arXiv:hep-th/0702155

    2007 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Armas, J

    J. Armas, J. Gath, and N. A. Obers, Black Branes as Piezoelectrics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 241101 (2012) , arXiv:1209.2127 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Armas, J

    J. Armas, J. Gath, and N. A. Obers, Electroe- lasticity of Charged Black Branes, JHEP 10, 035 , arXiv:1307.0504 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  74. [82]

    Bhattacharyya, R

    S. Bhattacharyya, R. Loganayagam, S. Minwalla, S. Nampuri, S. P. Trivedi, and S. R. Wadia, Forced Fluid Dynamics from Gravity, JHEP 02, 018 , arXiv:0806.0006 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  75. [83]

    Bhattacharyya, V

    S. Bhattacharyya, V. E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla, and M. Rangamani, Nonlinear Fluid Dynamics from Gravity, JHEP 02, 045 , arXiv:0712.2456 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  76. [84]

    Banerjee, J

    N. Banerjee, J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Dutta, R. Loganayagam, and P. Surówka, Hydrody- namics from charged black branes, Journal of High En- ergy Physics 2011, 10.1007/jhep01(2011)094 (2011)

    2011 doi

  77. [85]

    Megias and F

    E. Megias and F. Pena-Benitez, Holographic Gravita- tional Anomaly in First and Second Order Hydrodynam- ics, JHEP 05, 115 , arXiv:1304.5529 [hep-th] . 8 Supplementary Material Appendix A: Geometry of embedded spaces In this section we give details on the geometry of embedded ...

    arXiv

  78. [86]

    leading to the modified conservation law ∇µ T µν = F νµλρσ J µλρσ , (A.10) where the first term is the Lorentz force induced by the five for m, J µλρσ is the D3-brane current that admits a multipole expansion similar to ( 1) and obeys the conservation law ∇µ J µλρσ = 0. Higher-fo...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.