Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 3 minor 39 references

Double-Bridge Mechanism for Enhancing Tc in Oxide Superconductors

T0 review · 5 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An oxygen-bridge attraction between Cooper pairs is proposed as the driver of high Tc in oxide superconductors, raising Tc linearly with pair-pair scattering length.

desk verdict New qualitative bridge-II idea, but the Tc-enhancement claim rests on an unmodeled δQ and an uncomputed a; ideal BEC already fits the data. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.03658 v3 pith:SF4DDMFT submitted 2025-12-03 cond-mat.supr-con

Jun-jie Shi , Juan Du , Yao-hui Zhu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords high-temperaturesuperconductivitycupratesBose-EinsteincondensationCooperpairsdouble-bridgemechanismionicbondingpseudogapscatteringlength
topics High-Temperature Superconductivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish why cuprate superconductors can keep their superconducting transition so high. It argues that two bridging steps work together: first, strong ionic bonds create Cooper pairs above the transition temperature; second, oxygen anions sitting between pairs turn the direct repulsion between pairs into a net attraction. That net attraction drives the pairs to Bose-condense and, through Eq. (3), raises Tc linearly with the attractive scattering length between pairs. If this picture is correct, the route to higher Tc becomes a concrete materials-design problem: strengthen the oxygen bridge, lower the pair's effective mass, and keep the pair density at its optimal value.

What carries the argument

The central object is the double-bridge mechanism. Bridge-I is the ionic-bond-driven pairing h+-Cu-h+ (or e–-O-e–) that preforms Cooper pairs at the pseudogap temperature. Bridge-II is the same oxygen anion acting as an inter-pair mediator: its Coulomb attraction to two neighboring pairs outweighs their direct repulsion, producing a net attraction. The quantitative workhorse is Eq. (3), which converts that attraction into a linear rise of Tc with the negative scattering length a; λ0, the thermal de Broglie wavelength, is fixed only by the Cooper-pair density. The CuO2 plane is thereby described as a network in which pairs condense coherently through oxygen bridges.

What would settle it

Measure the oxygen valence across Tc in a cuprate such as YBa2Cu3O7 using X-ray absorption or X-ray photoemission: if the oxygen 2p occupancy shows no step-like increase at Tc within meV-level sensitivity, the Q→Q+δQ premise fails, and with it the bridge-II net attraction. Alternatively, a quantum Monte Carlo calculation of the effective pair-pair interaction in a CuO2 plane including one oxygen bridge would reveal whether the scattering length a is really negative.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the indirect attraction between two h+-Cu-h+ Cooper pairs, mediated by the oxygen anion that sits between them (bridge-II), overcomes their direct Coulomb repulsion. At the superconducting transition, this net attraction makes the preformed pairs 'hold hands' across the CuO2 plane and undergo Bose-Einstein condensation. The quantitative content is Eq. (3): Tc = Tc0 (1 - 3.426 a/λ0), so Tc increases linearly as the pair-pair scattering length a becomes more negative. The same double-bridge logic is extended to electron pairs, to nickelates, and to other strongly ionic superconductors, making the proposal a universal route rather than a cuprate-specific fix.

Load-bearing premise

The enhancement rests on the unproven premise that, once the material cools below Tc, oxygen anions spontaneously gain a small amount of negative charge (Q→Q+δQ), creating the net attraction between Cooper pairs; the paper gives no mechanism for this charge shift and itself states that the exact mechanism still requires further investigation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Strengthening the bridge-II attraction (larger |a|) raises Tc linearly, so chemical changes that make oxygen more polarizable or more strongly coupled to the pairs should push Tc upward.
  • Minimizing the Cooper-pair effective mass m*_pair raises Tc as 1/m*_pair, which is the same scaling seen in the empirical carrier-density-over-mass plot for underdoped layered superconductors.
  • There is an optimal pair density: adding carriers beyond it dissociates Cooper pairs and lowers Tc, matching the dome-shaped phase diagram of the cuprates.
  • Because the mechanism is framed around ionic bonding, it transfers beyond the cuprates to nickelates, iron-based materials, and other ionic oxide superconductors.
  • The bridge-II attraction supplies the missing condensation force: preformed pairs at the pseudogap temperature can condense at a Tc higher than what an ideal, noninteracting Bose gas would give.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the oxygen charge shift below Tc is real, it should be directly observable as a step-like change in oxygen K-edge absorption or oxygen core-level binding energy at Tc; the paper does not compute its magnitude, so this is a testable prediction.
  • Equation (3) is a mean-field correction, so the linear rise in Tc with |a| cannot continue indefinitely; near the point where |a| approaches the inter-pair spacing, higher-order terms should saturate the enhancement—an upper bound the paper leaves open.
  • A direct first-principles calculation of the effective scattering length between two h+-Cu-h+ pairs bridged by one oxygen anion would settle the sign (attractive or repulsive) without relying on the screened-Coulomb estimates in Fig. 1(b).
  • The bridge picture suggests a systematic materials probe: isovalent substitutions on the oxygen site (e.g., fluorine or sulfur doping) should change the bridge's ionic valence and therefore shift Tc in a predictable way.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a 'double-bridge mechanism' for high-Tc oxide superconductors. Bridge-I is the authors' earlier ionic-bond-driven atom-bridged Cooper pairing (h+-Cu-h+ or e−-O-e−) formed above Tc; bridge-II is a claimed O-mediated (or Cu-mediated) attraction between such Cooper pairs that overcomes direct Coulomb repulsion and drives BEC of preformed pairs. The paper argues that Tc is given by the ideal BEC formula Eq. (2) plus an interaction correction Eq. (3), with attractive scattering length a<0 increasing Tc linearly. The enhancement is attributed to an oxygen valence shift Q→Q+δQ at T≤Tc, and Fig. 4 plots Tc versus |a| using parameters in Table I for six cuprates.

Significance. If established, the mechanism would provide a concrete design route for raising Tc through the parameters n_pair, m_pair*, and the inter-pair scattering length a. The paper has some virtues: it uses established BEC/Uemura scaling relations, and Table I shows that the ideal-BEC expression Eq. (2) reproduces the experimental Tc of six cuprates to within a few kelvin. It also clearly identifies the two conceptual ingredients — strong pairing and inter-pair attraction — that a complete high-Tc theory must address. However, the central new claim is not actually derived. The oxygen charge shift δQ is introduced as an assertion, no calculation connects the bridge-II interaction to the scattering length a in Eq. (3), and the paper's own Table I indicates that the ideal term already accounts for the measured Tc values. The paper therefore currently functions as a qualitative scenario rather than a falsifiable quantitative theory.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 'Enhancement of the Coulomb attraction between Cooper pairs and bridge-II atoms'; Fig. 2 caption] The net bridge-II attraction requires the oxygen valence shift Q→Q+δQ at T≤Tc. This shift is asserted, not derived; the text itself states 'The exact mechanism still requires further investigation.' No microscopic model, experimental observable, or order-of-magnitude estimate for δQ is provided. Since the prior balance in Fig. 2(a) is also described qualitatively, the paper does not establish that a net inter-pair attraction exists.
  2. [Eqs. (3), (4); Fig. 4] No calculation connects the bridge-II Coulomb interaction to the Cooper-pair scattering length a. The paper neither estimates |a| from the Fig. 1(b) energy scales nor identifies a physical mechanism for tuning it. Consequently Fig. 4 is an illustrative plot of Eq. (3) with arbitrary |a|, not a prediction of the double-bridge mechanism.
  3. [Eq. (3)] Equation (3) is a low-density perturbative result for the BEC transition shift. Its linear dependence on a is valid only for |a| n^{1/3} << 1. The text says |a| can exceed the interparticle distance, and Fig. 4 extrapolates to large |a|; moreover, a uniform Bose gas with strong attractive a<0 is unstable against collapse. Without a stabilizing mechanism, the claimed linear Tc enhancement cannot be read off Eq. (3).
  4. [End Matter, Table I] Table I shows that T0_c from Eq. (2) already lies within 3 K of TExp_c for all six cuprates. Thus the measured critical temperatures do not require any attractive-scattering contribution, and no a is extracted from experiment. The paper's central claim is therefore neither necessary to explain existing data nor quantitatively supported by a computed a.
  5. [Fig. 1(b); Section 'Correlation of Cooper pairs and their interaction energy scale'] The claimed net attraction is not actually computed. The numbers quoted use a fixed Thomas-Fermi screening length (1.16 Å) and compare screened pair–O attractions (1.33–2.67 eV) with screened pair–pair repulsions (0.46–0.15 eV), but the 'equivalent repulsion' between the pair and the O anion, which the text says is required for ionic binding, is omitted from the balance. Including that repulsion could significantly reduce or reverse the net attraction; at minimum a quantitative estimate is needed.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 4] The axis labels are garbled typewriter-style symbols; the figure is not legible and should be redrawn with normal mathematical notation.
  2. [Section 'Estimation of Tc in cuprates'; Table I] The text states n_pair ~ 10^19–10^20 cm^-3, but Table I lists values up to 6.22×10^20 cm^-3. The relationship between n (single-particle carrier density), n_s, and n_pair is stated in Eq. (1), but the procedure for choosing n_pair for each compound should be made explicit.
  3. [References] The paper relies heavily on the authors' own preprint Ref. [15] for bridge-I pairing. The manuscript should summarize the key supporting evidence from that work so that the present Letter can be evaluated independently.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Bridge-II Tc-enhancement is Eq. (3) evaluated at an assumed a<0; preformed-pair premise is carried by the authors' own bridge-I preprint (Ref. [15]).

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sections 'Double-bridge mechanism of high-Tc superconductivity' and 'BEC of interacting Cooper pairs and the calculation of Tc', Eqs. (2)-(3), Fig. 4]
    "It is the net attraction between two h+-Cu-h+ Cooper pairs induced by the O-bridge (bridge-II), as analyzed in Fig. 2, that causes the Cooper pairs' condensation through "holding hands together" within the whole CuO2 plane, which directly contributes to the enhancement of the BEC temperature TBEC, namely Tc, in high-Tc cuprates (see Eq. (3)). Equation (3) clearly shows that Tc increases linearly with a for attractive interactions between two Cooper pairs... As an open-ended question, the maximization of a is definitely a highly challenging and complex material design engineering."

    The quantitative 'enhancement' is Eq. (3) evaluated at an assumed negative scattering length a<0. Nowhere does the paper compute a from the bridge-II geometry, the δQ shift, or any microscopic model; Fig. 4 is a parametric sweep of |a|. The net attraction that sets the sign of a is itself asserted via the unmodeled oxygen charge shift Q→Q+δQ (Fig. 2 caption), whose mechanism the paper concedes 'The exact mechanism still requires further investigation.' Hence the predicted Tc increase is the input assumption (attractive inter-pair interaction) restated through the textbook formula: the output is the input by construction, with no independent quantity tested. Table I shows the a=0 ideal term alone matches experimental Tc within ~3 K, so the bridge-II enhancement is neither derived nor requir

  2. self citation load bearing [Abstract; Section 'Enhancement of Tc in Oxide Superconductors'; End Matter paragraph 'Attraction between Cooper pairs...'; Ref. [15]]
    "Based on our recently proposed... eV-scale ionic-bond-driven atom-bridge (bridge-I) e−-O-e− (h+-M-h+) strong-coupling itinerant Cooper pairing formed at pseudogap temperature T∗>Tc... In Ref. [15], we proposed the eV-scale ionic-bond-driven atom-bridged (bridge-I) h+-M-h+ (e−-O-e−) strong itinerant Cooper pairing picture... This Letter addresses the key issue of the BEC phase transition of Cooper pairs h+-M-h+ (e−-O-e−) through the bridging effect of O (Cu or Ni) atoms (bridge-II)."

    The entire BEC-Tc chain presupposes that preformed Cooper pairs exist at T*>Tc (bridge-I). That premise is established here only by citing the authors' own prior arXiv preprint (Ref. [15], Shi & Zhu, arXiv:2503.13104), not by any argument, calculation, or external constraint in this Letter. The paper repeatedly attributes the pairing picture to 'our recently proposed' bridge-I and explicitly splits the double-bridge claim into 'issue (1)' (pairing, solved in [15]) and 'issue (2)' (condensation, this Letter). Consequently the load-bearing input of the claimed derivation — the existence of pairs whose condensation is then computed — is carried by a same-author citation, and the paper's 'confirmation' that Cooper pairs exist at room temperature rests on that self-citation chain.

full rationale

The BEC machinery itself is genuine, externally anchored theory, which keeps the score below 8: Eq. (2) is the textbook ideal-gas BEC temperature cited to [19]; Eq. (3) is the textbook interaction shift cited to [19,20]; Table I's near-agreement (T0_c within ~3 K of experiment) uses n_pair and m*_pair from the independent experimental compilation [37], and the Uemura plot provides external correlation support. That part is not circular. The circularity is concentrated where the paper claims new physics. (i) The predicted bridge-II enhancement reduces by construction: Fig. 4 and the claim that 'Tc increases linearly with a<0' are just Eq. (3) run with an assumed attractive scattering length; no calculation links bridge-II geometry or the speculative oxygen charge shift δQ to a value of a. The paper itself concedes 'The exact mechanism still requires further investigation' (Section 'Enhancement of the Coulomb attraction...') and that maximizing a is 'a highly challenging and complex material design engineering' problem — i.e., the central input is unconstrained assertion. (ii) The premise that preformed Cooper pairs exist at T*>Tc is imported from the authors' own prior preprint [15], making the double-bridge derivation load-bearing on self-citation. As a correctness (not circularity) risk: Eq. (3) is a weak-coupling dilute-gas result, and a<0 for a homogeneous Bose gas corresponds to mechanical instability, so the linear extrapolation in Fig. 4 is outside the regime of the cited theory. These admitted gaps, not hidden mathematics, are what the enhancement claim reduces to.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard BEC equations plus several unquantified inputs: pair density and mass are estimated/borrowed, the scattering length a is assumed negative but never computed, and the δQ effect is an ad hoc charge-shift assumption. The preformed-pair picture is imported from the authors' prior work without independent derivation here.

free parameters (5)
  • n_pair (Cooper-pair density) = 0.071–0.622 × 10^21 cm^-3 (Table I)
    Chosen by hand as a 'reasonable estimation'; directly enters Eqs (2) and (3) and controls Tc.
  • m*_pair (effective pair mass) = 6.4–24.0 m_e (Table I, from Ref [37])
    Taken from prior literature as an input; inversely proportional to Tc in Eq. (2).
  • a (Cooper-pair scattering length) = not computed
    Sign assumed negative; magnitude never derived; central to Eq. (3) and the claimed enhancement.
  • Thomas-Fermi screening length (λ_TF) = 1.16 Å
    Derived from assumed electron concentration 1e21 cm^-3; used to screen Coulomb energies in Fig. 1(b) and the text.
  • δQ (change in oxygen valence at Tc) = not specified
    Ad hoc mechanism invoked to produce the net inter-pair attraction; the paper states the exact mechanism requires further investigation.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Ideal BEC critical-temperature formula, Eq. (2)
    Standard result for non-interacting Bose gas, cited from Pitaevskii-Stringari.
  • standard math Mean-field interaction correction with scattering length, Eq. (3)
    Standard result for dilute interacting Bose gas; applied here to Cooper pairs without justification of diluteness or two-body scattering.
  • domain assumption Preformed h+-Cu-h+ / e−-O-e− Cooper pairs exist in the pseudogap phase
    Adopted from the authors' own prior arXiv:2503.13104; not independently established in this paper.
  • domain assumption eV-scale ionic bonding drives the bridge-I pairing
    Same prior-work assumption; the pairing mechanism itself is controversial and not derived here.
  • domain assumption Thomas-Fermi screening with n = 1e21 cm^-3
    Used to estimate screened Coulomb energies; screening length fixed by an assumed carrier concentration.
  • ad hoc to paper Oxygen valence increases (Q → Q+δQ) at T≤Tc
    Introduced in Fig. 2 caption and text; no mechanism or estimate provided, and the text says it 'still requires further investigation'.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Double-Bridge Mechanism for Enhancing Tc in Oxide Superconductors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SF4DDMFT

@misc{pith2026251203658,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Double-Bridge Mechanism for Enhancing Tc in Oxide Superconductors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SF4DDMFT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.03658}
}
abstract

We propose a new double-bridge mechanism to significantly enhance $T_c$ in ionic oxide superconductors. Based on our recently proposed ionic-bond-driven O/Cu-bridged (bridge-I) pairing e$^-$-O-e$^-$/h$^+$-Cu-h$^+$ formed in the pseudogap phase ($T_c<T<T^*$), we reveal a key bridge-II Cu/O-mediated inter-pair attraction that overcomes direct Coulomb repulsion and drives coherent Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) of preformed Cooper pairs. Within the BEC framework (Eq.(3)), $T_c$ follows the Uemura scaling $(n_{\rm pair}^{\rm 3D})^{2/3}/m_{\rm pair}^*$ or $n_{\rm pair}^{\rm 2D}/m_{\rm pair}^*$ and increases linearly with the attractive scattering length $a<0$. Strengthening bridge-II attraction, minimizing $m_{\rm pair}^*$, and optimizing $n_{\rm pair}^{\rm 3D}$ are the key to maximizing $T_c$. This double-bridge mechanism unifies the \textbf{eV-scale} strong pairing at room temperature and BEC, provides a universal route toward higher $T_c$, and guides the design of next-generation superconductors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.03658 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) The 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The double-bridge mechanism of high- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. BCS-BEC crossover phase diagram in high- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The superconducting critical temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references

  1. [1]

    J. G. Bednorz and K. A. M¨ uller, Possible highTc super- conductivity in the Ba-La-Cu-O system, Z. Phys. B64, 189 (1986)

    1986

  2. [2]

    Mourachkine,High-Temperature Superconductivity in Cuprates(Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002)

    A. Mourachkine,High-Temperature Superconductivity in Cuprates(Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002)

    2002

  3. [3]

    B. Y. Wang, K. Lee, and B. H. Goodge, Experimental progress in superconducting nickelates, Annu. Rev. Con- dens. Matter Phys.15, 305 (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    N. Wang, G. Wang, X. Shen, J. Hou, J. Luo, X. Ma, H. Yang, L. Shi, J. Dou, J. Feng, J. Yang, Y. Shi, Z. Ren, H. Ma, P. Yang, Z. Liu, Y. Liu, H. Zhang, X. Dong, Y. Wang, K. Jiang, J. Hu, S. Nagasaki, K. Kitagawa, S. Calder, J. Yan, J. Sun, B. Wang, R. Zhou, Y. Uwatoko, and J. Cheng, Bulk high-temperature superconductivity in pressurized tetragonal La 2PrNi...

    2024

  5. [5]

    Hosono, A

    H. Hosono, A. Yamamoto, H. Hiramatsu, and Y. Ma, Recent advances in iron-based superconductors toward applications, Mater. Today21, 278 (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    G. Gao, L. Wang, M. Li, J. Zhang, R. T. Howie, E. Gre- goryanz, V. V. Struzhkin, L. Wang, and J. S. Tse, Super- conducting binary hydrides: Theoretical predictions and experimental progresses, Mater. Today Phys.21, 100546 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    Ishiguro, K

    T. Ishiguro, K. Yamaji, and G. Saito,Organic super- conductors, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1998)

    1998

  8. [8]

    G. R. Stewart, Heavy-fermion systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 56, 755 (1984)

    1984

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    B. R. Ortiz, S. M. L. Teicher, L. Kautzsch, P. M. Sarte, N. Ratcliff, J. Harter, J. P. C. Ruff, R. Seshadri, and S. D. Wilson, Fermi surface mapping and the nature of charge-density-wave order in the kagome superconductor 6 CsV3Sb5, Phys. Rev. X11, 041030 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    L. Xu, Z. Xie, J. Wang, Q. Yin, H. Lei, and J. Zhang, Geometry-enhanced second-harmonic charge transport in kagome superconductor CsV 3Sb5, Nano Lett.25, 14222 (2025)

    2025

  3. [11]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional super- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Na- ture556, 43–50 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    M. R. Norman, Materials design for new superconduc- tors, Rep. Prog. Phys.79, 074502 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    P. W. Atkins, T. L. Overton, J. P. Rourke, M. T. Weller, F. A. Armstrong, and M. Hagerman,Shriver&Atkins’ Inorganic Chemistry, 5th ed. (Oxford University Press, 2010)

    2010

  6. [14]

    Kittel,Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th ed

    C. Kittel,Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th ed. (John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2005)

    2005

  7. [15]

    Shi and Y.-h

    J.-j. Shi and Y.-h. Zhu, Ionic-bond-driven atom-bridged room-temperature Cooper pairing in cuprates and nick- elates: a theoretical framework supported by 32 ex- perimental evidences (2025), arXiv:2503.13104v3 [cond- mat.supr-con]

    2025

  8. [16]

    Park and R

    C. Park and R. L. Snyder, Structures of high-temperature cuprate superconductors, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.78, 3171 (1995)

    1995

  9. [17]

    Kohsaka, C

    Y. Kohsaka, C. Taylor, K. Fujita, A. Schmidt, C. Lupien, T. Hanaguri, M. Azuma, M. Takano, H. Eisaki, H. Tak- agi, S. Uchida, and J. C. Davis, An intrinsic bond- centered electronic glass with unidirectional domains in underdoped cuprates, Science315, 1380 (2007)

    2007

  10. [18]

    Vojta and O

    M. Vojta and O. R¨ osch, Superconductingd-wave stripes in cuprates: Valence bond order coexisting with nodal quasiparticles, Phys. Rev. B77, 094504 (2008)

    2008

  11. [19]

    Pitaevskii and S

    L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari,Bose-Einstein Condensa- tion and Superfluidity(Oxford University Press, 2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Q. Chen, Z. Wang, R. Boyack, S. Yang, and K. Levin, When superconductivity crosses over: From BCS to BEC, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 025002 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Puphal, T

    P. Puphal, T. Sch¨ afer, B. Keimer, and M. Hepting, Su- perconductivity in infinite-layer and Ruddlesden–Popper nickelates, Nat. Rev. Phys. (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    J. J. Sakurai,Modern Quantum Mechanics, Rev. ed. (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 1994)

    1994

  15. [23]

    H. Yan, J. M. Bok, J. He, W. Zhang, Q. Gao, X. Luo, Y. Cai, Y. Peng, J. Meng, C. Li, H. Chen, C. Song, C. Yin, T. Miao, Y. Chen, G. Gu, C. Lin, F. Zhang, F. Yang, S. Zhang, Q. Peng, G. Liu, L. Zhao, H.-Y. Choi, Z. Xu, and X. J. Zhou, Ubiquitous coexisting electron- mode coupli...

    2023

  16. [24]

    Lanzara, P

    A. Lanzara, P. V. Bogdanov, X. J. Zhou, S. A. Kellar, D. L. Feng, E. D. Lu, T. Yoshida, H. Eisaki, A. Fujimori, K. Kishio, J. I. Shimoyama, T. Noda, S. Uchida, Z. Hus- sain, and Z. X. Shen, Evidence for ubiquitous strong elec- tron–phonon coupling in high-temperature supercond...

    2001

  17. [25]

    Gowsalya, M

    R. Gowsalya, M. Shaikh, and S. Ghosh, Designing fer- romagnetic polar half-metals in short-period perovskite nickelates, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.588, 171382 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    H¨ ufner, M

    S. H¨ ufner, M. A. Hossain, A. Damascelli, and G. A. Sawatzky, Two gaps make a high-temperature supercon- ductor?, Rep. Prog. Phys.71, 062501 (2008)

    2008

  19. [27]

    Zhu, J.-Q

    Q. Zhu, J.-Q. Fan, X.-Q. Yu, Y.-L. Xiong, H. Yan, R.- F. Wang, C.-L. Song, X.-C. Ma, and Q.-K. Xue, Real- space imaging of Bose-Einstein condensation behavior in infinite-layer cuprates, Phys. Rev. B111, 245410 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    C. A. R. S´ a de Melo, M. Randeria, and J. R. Engelbrecht, Crossover from BCS to Bose superconductivity: Transi- tion temperature and time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 3202 (1993)

    1993

  21. [29]

    Q. Chen, Z. Wang, R. Boyack, and K. Levin, Test for BCS-BEC crossover in the cuprate superconductors, npj Quantum Mater.9, 27 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Cheng, Bose-Einstein condensation of nonideal Cooper pairs in the Hartree–Fock–Popov theory, Found

    Z. Cheng, Bose-Einstein condensation of nonideal Cooper pairs in the Hartree–Fock–Popov theory, Found. Phys. 46, 915 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    Y. J. Uemura, G. M. Luke, B. J. Sternlieb, J. H. Brewer, J. F. Carolan, W. N. Hardy, R. Kadono, J. R. Kempton, R. F. Kiefl, S. R. Kreitzman, P. Mulhern, T. M. Rise- man, D. L. Williams, B. X. Yang, S. Uchida, H. Takagi, J. Gopalakrishnan, A. W. Sleight, M. A. Subramanian, C. L...

    1989

  24. [32]

    Y. J. Uemura, L. P. Le, G. M. Luke, B. J. Sternlieb, W. D. Wu, J. H. Brewer, T. M. Riseman, C. L. Sea- man, M. B. Maple, M. Ishikawa, D. G. Hinks, J. D. Jorgensen, G. Saito, and H. Yamochi, Basic similarities among cuprate, bismuthate, organic, Chevrel-phase, and heavy-Fermion...

    1991

  25. [33]

    Y. J. Uemura, Superfluid density of high-T c cuprate sys- tems: implication on condensation mechanisms, hetero- geneity and phase diagram, Solid State Commun.126, 23 (2003)

    2003

  26. [34]

    Y. J. Uemura, Condensation, excitation, pairing, and su- perfluid density in high-T c superconductors: the mag- netic resonance mode as a roton analogue and a possible spin-mediated pairing, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter16, S4515 (2004)

    2004

  27. [35]

    R. G. Sharma,Superconductivity: Basics and Applica- tions to Magnets, 2nd ed. (Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland, 2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Q. Dong, T. Shi, P. Yang, X. Liu, X. Shi, L. Wang, J. Xi- ang, H. Ma, Z. Tian, J. Sun, Y. Uwatoko, G. Chen, X. Wang, J. Shen, R. Wu, X. Lu, P. Sun, G. Chajew- ski, D. Kaczorowski, B. Wang, and J. Cheng, Strong su- perconducting pairing strength and pseudogap features in a puta...

    2025

  29. [37]

    D. R. Harshman and A. P. Mills, Jr., Concerning the na- ture of high-T c superconductivity: Survey of experimen- tal properties and implications for interlayer coupling, Phys. Rev. B45, 10684 (1992)

    1992

  30. [38]

    Z. Z. Wang, J. Clayhold, N. P. Ong, J. M. Tarascon, L. H. Greene, W. R. McKinnon, and G. W. Hull, Variation of superconductivity with carrier concentration in oxygen- doped YBa 2Cu3O7 –y, Phys. Rev. B36, 7222 (1987)

    1987

  31. [39]

    D. N. Basov and T. Timusk, Electrodynamics of high-T c superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 721 (2005). 7 End Matter Attraction between Cooper pairs in oxide supercon- ductors: the driving force from BCS to BEC—Quite recently, the electronic properties of CuO 2 planes in an ele...

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.