Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 40 references

Unveiling the Nature of C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS): A Multi-Technique Observational Approach

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Spectra and orbital history mark C/2023 A3 as a carbon-depleted, dynamically new Oort cloud comet.

desk verdict Carbon depletion is real but already reported; the new DNC claim is plausible but doesn't yet carry its weight because the qprev distribution and stellar perturbations are missing. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.06769 v2 pith:SHMQB5EF submitted 2026-07-07 astro-ph.EP

classification astro-ph.EP
keywords C/2023A3(Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)dynamicallynewcometOortcloudcarbondepletioncometarycompositionproductionratesN-bodysimulationGalactictide
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that comet C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) is both chemically and dynamically special. Spectra taken before and after perihelion show the comet is uniformly depleted in carbon-bearing molecules, a trait seen in only a handful of long-period comets. Backward N-body integration of 100 clones over 10 million years indicates its previous perihelion lay beyond 15 au, meaning it has not entered the inner solar system before. If both results hold, A3 is a pristine Oort-cloud object on its first solar passage, and its carbon depletion points to an inhomogeneous Oort cloud.

What carries the argument

Two mechanisms carry the argument. For composition, narrowband photometry of molecular emission bands yields production-rate ratios C2/CN and C3/CN, which are compared to the carbon-class thresholds established by a survey of 85 comets. For dynamics, a hybrid symplectic N-body integrator propagates 100 statistical clones of the comet backward 10 million years under the Sun, planets, and the Galactic tidal field, recovering the previous perihelion distance.

What would settle it

Re-run the N-body integration with updated orbital elements and include passing stars; if the recovered previous perihelion falls below 15 au, the dynamically-new claim is falsified. Separately, if deeper post-perihelion spectroscopy pushes the C2/CN production-rate ratio above the published carbon-depletion threshold, the homogeneous depletion claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes two facts about comet C/2023 A3. First, from low-resolution spectra obtained at a 2-meter telescope before perihelion and a small-aperture instrument afterward, the C2/CN and C3/CN production-rate ratios place the comet in the carbon-depleted class both before perihelion (when only CN was detected) and after perihelion (when C2 and C3 appeared). This homogeneous depletion is unusual for a long-period comet. Second, N-body simulations integrating 100 clones backward in time for 10 million years under the Sun, planets, and the Galactic tidal field show the comet's previous perihelion was well outside the inner solar system (qprev > 15 au), confirming it

Load-bearing premise

The dynamically-new classification depends on the 10-million-year backward integration being faithful: if the adopted Galactic tidal model or the initial orbital elements are wrong, the previous perihelion could drop below 15 au, and A3 would no longer qualify as dynamically new.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If A3 is a true dynamically new comet, its carbon-depleted composition is unaltered by prior solar heating, making it a direct sample of early solar system material.
  • The depletion seen in this dynamically new comet, while many in that class are carbon-typical, implies the Oort cloud is chemically heterogeneous.
  • The agreement of A3's broadband colors with the median long-period comet color suggests dynamical class does not predict optical color.
  • The pre-perihelion spectrum showing only CN strengthens the case that carbon depletion can be diagnosed early, before C2 becomes visible.
  • The qprev > 15 au result supports the revised dynamically-new criterion over the older semi-major axis threshold.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if homogeneous carbon depletion is confirmed with higher signal-to-noise spectra, A3 would join a very short list of carbon-depleted long-period comets; comparing those comets' orbital histories might identify a common source region or processing environment in the Oort cloud.
  • A testable extension: near-infrared or radio observations of carbon-bearing volatiles (e.g., CO, H2CO) could determine whether the depletion reflects the nuclear ice composition or coma chemistry.
  • The dynamical classification rests on a specific Galactic-tide model; including passing stars in the integration is the natural next step, and it could either firm up or overturn the qprev > 15 au result.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports optical spectroscopy (HCT/HFOSC pre-perihelion and CepO/ALPY600 post-perihelion), broad-band photometry, and backward N-body simulations of comet C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS). It concludes that the comet is carbon-depleted at both observed epochs and that a 10 Myr backward integration with 100 clones under a Galactic tidal model gives a previous perihelion well outside 15 au, making the comet a 'true' dynamically new Oort-cloud comet. The spectral figures and broad-band colors are presented; however, the quantitative production-rate ratios and the clone statistics behind the qprev result are not reported in the manuscript.

Significance. If established, C/2023 A3 would be a rare carbon-depleted dynamically new Oort-cloud comet, supporting the view that the Oort cloud is compositionally heterogeneous. The observational material is original, the pre-/post-perihelion spectral contrast is visually compelling, and independent reports (Jehin et al. 2024; Cambianica et al. 2025) already support carbon depletion, so the composition claim is plausible. The dynamical claim is also plausible but currently rests on an underspecified N-body experiment that neglects stellar perturbations and reports no qprev distribution. These are reporting gaps that can be fixed within the manuscript's scope, not fatal errors.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, 'Results' (production rates)] The central carbon-depletion classification depends on C2/CN and C3/CN production-rate ratios, but no values, uncertainties, or upper limits are given anywhere in the manuscript. The reader cannot verify that the comet falls on the depleted side of the A'Hearn et al. (1995) taxonomy, nor can the claim of 'homogeneously depleted' be checked quantitatively. Please include a table of molecular fluxes, Haser-model parameters, production rates, ratios, and 3σ upper limits for non-detections, for each epoch, and clearly separate new values from those taken from Jehin et al. (2024) and Cambianica et al. (2025). Without this, the depletion claim is an assertion rather than a demonstrated result.
  2. [Sections 2.3 and 4 (N-body qprev)] The 'true DNC' conclusion rests entirely on the 10 Myr backward integration with 100 clones and a Galactic tidal model, but no clone statistics are reported. Please give the median and range of qprev, the fraction of clones with qprev > 15 au, the adopted Galactic tidal potential and parameters, the initial osculating elements and epoch, and the JPL solution used to generate clones. The authors' own caveat in Section 4 — 'Further confirmations using the updated epoch and the other forces, such as stellar perturbations, may better constrain the results' — is in tension with the unqualified statement in Section 3 that the simulation 'confirms that the comet is a DNC.' Quantify the sensitivity to stellar perturbations or explicitly limit the classification to the model used.
  3. [Section 3 (pre- vs post-perihelion comparison)] The 'homogeneously depleted' conclusion is based on two very different instrumental setups and spectral reductions (HFOSC/HCT pre-perihelion; ALPY600/CepO post-perihelion). The post-perihelion spectrum appears to show additional molecular emissions, yet the text states the comet remains depleted. Please specify the analysis method, aperture, and solar-analog subtraction for each epoch, and confirm that the same depletion criterion was applied to both. If the post-perihelion depletion is only qualitative, say so explicitly rather than using the same quantitative-sounding language for both epochs.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3] The text refers to 'Figure 2.3' but the actual figure is labeled 'Figure 1'; fix the cross-reference.
  2. [Table 1] The header 'Comet C/2023 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)' should read 'C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)'; also '167l' and '1340l' appear to be '167L' and '1340L'.
  3. [Abstract and Section 1] The comet is called 'dynamically new' before the dynamical analysis is presented. Recommend writing 'candidate dynamically new' in the abstract and introduction, with the confirmation placed in the results/conclusion.
  4. [Section 3 (photometry)] The quoted colors B−V=0.74±0.01, V−R=0.48±0.01, R−I=0.45±0.01 are given without a table of individual magnitudes or a description of the photometric aperture and coma contamination. Add the underlying measurements and justify the 0.01 mag uncertainties, which seem optimistic for a 0.073 m telescope.
  5. [Section 2.3] Please state the exact JPL ephemeris solution and epoch used for the covariance matrix, and give the explicit form of the Galactic tidal acceleration adopted. This is needed for reproducibility of the dynamical result.
  6. [Abstract] The phrase 'the brightest since the comet C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp)' is not directly supported by a reference and is not needed for the paper's conclusions; consider softening or citing a source.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the carbon-depletion and dynamically-new-comet claims rest on independent observations and external thresholds.

full rationale

The paper's two central claims are not built into their inputs. The carbon-depletion claim (§3, Fig. 2.3) is derived from measured production-rate ratios C2/CN and C3/CN, classified using the external A'Hearn et al. (1995) limit; agreement with Jehin et al. (2024) and Cambianica et al. (2025) is independent corroboration, not an input to the reduction. The DNC claim (§3, §4) is obtained by backward-integrating 100 clones from the JPL covariance with REBOUND/Mercurius under a Galactic tide, and then comparing the resulting previous perihelion with the external DNC criterion qprev > 15 au from Królikowska and Dybczyński (2010). No parameter is fitted to force qprev above the threshold, and the threshold itself is not derived from the simulation. The self-citations for methodology (Ahuja et al. 2025; Ahuja and Ganesh 2025) delegate technical details but do not smuggle the target result into the setup; no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work. The manuscript honestly flags the main uncertainty in §4: 'Further confirmations using the updated epoch and the other forces, such as stellar perturbations, may better constrain the results on the previous perihelion passage.' That is a model-fidelity/correctness risk, not a circular step. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained with respect to the claims made; no step reduces, by construction or by self-citation, to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters fitted to data and no new entities. It relies on literature-based interpretation (A'Hearn depletion thresholds, Haser model, Galactic tide parameters) and on the fidelity of JPL elements plus the N-body integrator; those are domain assumptions rather than fitted quantities. The main unstated burden is that the quantitative production-rate and simulation results are not actually presented in this preprint.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption A'Hearn et al. (1995) carbon-class boundaries (C2/CN, C3/CN) apply to A3.
    Used in §3 to call the comet depleted; this threshold comes from 85 comets and is external, but is an interpretive assumption.
  • domain assumption Single-aperture Haser model with literature scale lengths/g-factors yields reliable production rates.
    Invoked in §3; not re-derived, and the actual rates are not shown.
  • domain assumption REBOUND/Mercurius with 8-day timestep and Galactic tidal model captures 10 Myr dynamics.
    Setup §2.3; unverified by the paper for this object; conclusion says stellar perturbations may change results.
  • domain assumption JPL osculating elements and covariance represent the comet's state well enough for cloning.
    Clones in §2.3 initialized from JPL HORIZONS; no independent astrometric check shown.
  • domain assumption Solar-analog subtraction removes cometary solar continuum in ALPY600 spectra.
    §2.1-2.2; necessary for clean emission lines, no verification plot shown.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unveiling the Nature of C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS): A Multi-Technique Observational Approach." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SHMQB5EF

@misc{pith2026260706769,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unveiling the Nature of C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS): A Multi-Technique Observational Approach},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SHMQB5EF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.06769}
}
read the original abstract

Comet C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) is a non-periodic dynamically new Oort cloud comet that was discovered independently by Purple Mountain Observatory in China and Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) telescopes in South Africa. The comet passed perihelion at a distance of 0.39 AU on 27 September 2024. It was visible to the naked eye (the brightest since the comet C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp)) and was dubbed the great comet of 2024. In this work, we investigate the nature of this comet, which is moving in a hyperbolic orbit (e > 1), by analysing its composition using various observational techniques and tracing its orbital evolution through high-precision N-body simulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06769 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Spectra of comet C/2023 A3: (a) Pre-perihelion epoch us [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 7 linked inside Pith

  1. [4]

    Late Heavy Bombardment

    Harold F. Levison and Luke Dones and Clark R. Chapman and S.Alan Stern and Martin J. Duncan and Kevin Zahnle , abstract =. Could the Lunar “Late Heavy Bombardment” Have Been Triggered by the Formation of Uranus and Neptune? , journal =. 2001 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.2001.6608 , url =

  2. [6]

    Brasser and A

    R. Brasser and A. Morbidelli , keywords =. Oort cloud and Scattered Disc formation during a late dynamical instability in the Solar System , journal =. 2013 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2013.03.012 , url =

  3. [7]

    F , title = "

    Levison, H. F , title = ". Completing the Inventory of the Solar System, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Proceedings , keywords =. 1996 , month =

  4. [10]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    Warsaw Catalogue of cometary orbits: 119 near-parabolic comets. Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323263 , archivePrefix =. 1407.0553 , primaryClass =

  5. [11]

    The Effect of Cosmic Rays on Cometary Nuclei. I. Dose Deposition. The Astrophysical Journal , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab67b9 , archivePrefix =. 2012.05772 , primaryClass =

  6. [13]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    Molecular gas production rates of Comet C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan - ATLAS). The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  7. [15]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    Ionic emission from and activity evolution in comet C/2020 F3 (NEOWISE): Insights from long-slit spectroscopy and photometry. Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554842 , archivePrefix =. 2507.21707 , primaryClass =

  8. [18]

    The Astrophysical Journal , keywords =

    The ATLAS All-Sky Stellar Reference Catalog. The Astrophysical Journal , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae386 , archivePrefix =. 1809.09157 , primaryClass =

Show all 40 references
  1. [20]

    Summary of the content and survey properties , journal =

    Gaia Data Release 3. Summary of the content and survey properties , journal =

  2. [22]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    REBOUND: an open-source multi-purpose N-body code for collisional dynamics. Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118085 , archivePrefix =. 1110.4876 , primaryClass =

  3. [23]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    IAS15: a fast, adaptive, high-order integrator for gravitational dynamics, accurate to machine precision over a billion orbits. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2164 , archivePrefix =. 1409.4779 , primaryClass =

  4. [24]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    Hybrid symplectic integrators for planetary dynamics. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz769 , archivePrefix =. 1903.04972 , primaryClass =

  5. [26]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    TRAPPIST bright comets production rates: 13P/Olbers, C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan - ATLAS) and C/2021 S3 (PanSTARRS). The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  6. [32]

    F., Millis, R

    A'Hearn, M. F., Millis, R. C., Schleicher, D. G., Osip, D. J. and Birch, P. V. (1995) The ensemble properties of comets: Results from narrowband photometry of 85 comets, 1976-1992. Icarus, 118(2), 223--270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.1995.1190

  7. [33]

    V., Jehin, E., Sahu, D

    Ahuja, G., Aravind, K., Ganesh, S., Hmiddouch, S., Donckt, M. V., Jehin, E., Sahu, D. and Sivarani, T. (2025) Long-term monitoring of a dynamically new comet C/2020 V2 (ZTF) . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 543(2), 1178--1195. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf1528

  8. [34]

    V., Hmiddouch , S., Ganesh , S

    Ahuja , G., Aravind , K., Sahu , D., Jehin , E., Donckt , M. V., Hmiddouch , S., Ganesh , S. and Sivarani , T. (2024) Molecular gas production rates of Comet C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan - ATLAS) . The Astronomer's Telegram, 16637, 1

  9. [35]

    and Ganesh, S

    Ahuja, G. and Ganesh, S. (2025) Dynamical Simulation of the Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS . The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 995(1), L13. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ae21cf

  10. [36]

    and Benkhaldoun , Z

    Aravind , K., Jehin , E., Hmiddouch , S., Vander Donckt , M., Ganesh , S., Rousselot , P., Hardy , P., Sahu , D., Manfroid , J. and Benkhaldoun , Z. (2025) Ionic emission from and activity evolution in comet C/2020 F3 (NEOWISE): Insights from long-slit spectroscopy and photome...

  11. [37]

    Bessell , M. S. (2005) Standard Photometric Systems . Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 43(1), 293--336. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.41.082801.100251

  12. [38]

    and Boschin , W

    Cambianica , P., Munaretto , G., Cremonese , G., Mura , A., La Forgia , F., Bizzocchi , L., Lazzarin , M., Puzzarini , C., Melosso , M., Lorenzi , V. and Boschin , W. (2025) Pre-perihelion observations of the carbon-depleted comet C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS). Insights into C...

  13. [39]

    Gaia Collaboration , Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J. et al. (2023) Gaia data release 3. summary of the content and survey properties. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 674, A1. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

  14. [40]

    F., Tsiganis, K

    Gomes, R., Levison, H. F., Tsiganis, K. and Morbidelli, A. (2005) Origin of the cataclysmic late heavy bombardment period of the terrestrial planets. Nature, 435(7041), 466--469. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03676

  15. [41]

    B., Airapetian , V., De Keyser , J., Dhooghe , F., Gibbons , A., Gunell , H., Mertens , C

    Gronoff , G., Maggiolo , R., Cessateur , G., Moore , W. B., Airapetian , V., De Keyser , J., Dhooghe , F., Gibbons , A., Gunell , H., Mertens , C. J., Rubin , M. and Hosseini , S. (2020) The Effect of Cosmic Rays on Cometary Nuclei. I. Dose Deposition . The Astrophysical Journ...

  16. [42]

    V., Hmiddouch , S

    Jehin , E., Donckt , M. V., Hmiddouch , S. and Manfroid , J. (2024) TRAPPIST bright comets production rates: 13P/Olbers, C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan - ATLAS) and C/2021 S3 (PanSTARRS) . The Astronomer's Telegram, 16705, 1

  17. [43]

    (2015) Color systematics of comets and related bodies*

    Jewitt, D. (2015) Color systematics of comets and related bodies*. The Astronomical Journal, 150(6), 201. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/150/6/201

  18. [44]

    and Bonev , T

    Kostov , A. and Bonev , T. (2018) Transformation of Pan-STARRS1 gri to Stetson BVRI magnitudes. Photometry of small bodies observations. Bulgarian Astronomical Journal, 28, 3. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.06147

  19. [45]

    (2014) Warsaw Catalogue of cometary orbits: 119 near-parabolic comets

    Kr \'o likowska , M. (2014) Warsaw Catalogue of cometary orbits: 119 near-parabolic comets . Astronomy and Astrophysics, 567, A126. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201323263

  20. [46]

    and Dybczy \'n ski, P

    Kr \'o likowska, M. and Dybczy \'n ski, P. A. (2010) Where do long-period comets come from? 26 comets from the non-gravitational Oort spike . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 404(4), 1886--1902. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16403.x

  21. [47]

    P., Afanasiev , V

    Kulyk , I., Rousselot , P., Korsun , P. P., Afanasiev , V. L., Sergeev , A. V. and Velichko , S. F. (2018) Physical activity of the selected nearly isotropic comets with perihelia at large heliocentric distance . Astronomy and Astrophysics, 611, A32. https://doi.org/10.1051/00...

  22. [48]

    Levison, H. F. (1996) Comet Taxonomy . Completing the Inventory of the Solar System, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Proceedings, 107, 173--191

  23. [49]

    Morbidelli, A., Tsiganis, K., Crida, A., Levison, H. F. and Gomes, R. (2007) Dynamics of the giant planets of the solar system in the gaseous protoplanetary disk and their relationship to the current orbital architecture. The Astronomical Journal, 134(5), 1790. https://doi.org...

  24. [50]

    F., Kaib, N

    Nesvorn \'y , D., Vokrouhlick \'y , D., Dones, L., Levison, H. F., Kaib, N. and Morbidelli, A. (2017) Origin and evolution of short-period comets. The Astrophysical Journal, 845(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa7cf6

  25. [51]

    and Zakraj s ek , J

    Parrott , D. and Zakraj s ek , J. (2025) Tycho Tracker: A Comprehensive All-in-One Tool for Comet Photometry . In EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2025, vol. 2025, pp. EPSC--DPS2025--1222. https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc-dps2025-1222

  26. [52]

    Prabhu , T. P. (2014) Indian Astronomical Observatory, Leh-Hanle . Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy Part A, 80(4), 887--912. https://doi.org/10.16943/ptinsa/2014/v80i4/55174

  27. [53]

    M., Tamayo , D., Brown , G., Eckels , E., Holmes , E., Lau , M., Leblanc , R

    Rein , H., Hernandez , D. M., Tamayo , D., Brown , G., Eckels , E., Holmes , E., Lau , M., Leblanc , R. and Silburt , A. (2019) Hybrid symplectic integrators for planetary dynamics . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 485(4), 5490--5497. https://doi.org/10.1093...

  28. [54]

    and Liu , S

    Rein , H. and Liu , S. F. (2012) REBOUND: an open-source multi-purpose N-body code for collisional dynamics . Astronomy and Astrophysics, 537, A128. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201118085

  29. [55]

    L., Denneau , L., Flewelling , H., Heinze , A

    Tonry , J. L., Denneau , L., Flewelling , H., Heinze , A. N., Onken , C. A., Smartt , S. J., Stalder , B., Weiland , H. J. and Wolf , C. (2018) The ATLAS All-Sky Stellar Reference Catalog . The Astrophysical Journal, 867(2), 105. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aae386

  30. [56]

    and Levison, H

    Tsiganis, K., Gomes, R., Morbidelli, A. and Levison, H. F. (2005) Origin of the orbital architecture of the giant planets of the solar system. Nature, 435(7041), 459--461. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03539

  31. [57]

    C., Agnihotri, V

    Venkataramani, K., Ghetiya, S., Ganesh, S., Joshi, U. C., Agnihotri, V. K. and Baliyan, K. S. (2016) Optical spectroscopy of comet c/2014 q2 (lovejoy) from the mount abu infrared observatory. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 463(2), 2137--2144. https://doi.or...

  32. [58]

    J., Morbidelli, A., Raymond, S

    Walsh, K. J., Morbidelli, A., Raymond, S. N., O'Brien, D. P. and Mandell, A. M. (2011) A low mass for mars from jupiter's early gas-driven migration. Nature, 475(7355), 206--209. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10201

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.