Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Ferromagnetic instabilities in quarkyonic matter

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Pure neutron quarkyonic matter can spontaneously become ferromagnetic below about 5.5 times nuclear saturation density if the neutron spin-spin interaction is attractive.

desk verdict A novel spin susceptibility calculation for quarkyonic matter, but the headline ferromagnetic instability rests on a hand-picked parameter and an internal inconsistency. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.06577 v1 pith:SLE2DQ6E submitted 2025-07-09 nucl-th

Bikai Gao , Kenichi Yoshida This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-th
keywords quarkyonicmatterferromagneticinstabilityspinsusceptibilitypureneutronstarsmagnetarspolarizationequationofstate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether quarkyonic matter—the intermediate-density phase in which quarks fill a deep Fermi sea and nucleons occupy a thin shell at the Fermi surface—can magnetize by itself. The authors extend the quarkyonic model to allow the nucleon shell to spin-polarize, add a neutron interaction with a spin-dependent term, and compute the spin susceptibility. They find that pure neutron quarkyonic matter has negative spin susceptibility below about $5.5n_0$ when the spin-dependent interaction parameter is $\tilde{p}=-0.002\,\mathrm{MeV\,fm^6}$, meaning the system would spontaneously polarize without an external magnetic field. The effect matters because it would give neutron star cores a ferromagnetic capability that does not require protons, offering a new handle on magnetar fields and dense-matter magnetism.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the quarkyonic Fermi-sea geometry combined with a quadratic spin-asymmetry interaction. Quarks occupy momenta from $0$ to $N_c k_{FQ}$ and stay unpolarized; nucleons live in a shell of width $\Delta=\Lambda_{\rm QCD}(\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/k_{FB})^\alpha$ and can split into spin-up and spin-down Fermi momenta $k^\uparrow_{FB}=(1+\xi)k_{FB}$ and $k^\downarrow_{FB}=(1-\xi)k_{FB}$. The interaction is taken from the neutron-matter parametrization of Ref. [59], $V_n=\tilde{a}(n_n/n_0)+\tilde{b}(n_n/n_0)^2+\tilde{p}(n^\uparrow_n-n^\downarrow_n)^2$, where $\tilde{a}<0$ is attractive and $\tilde{b}>0$ is repulsive; the $\tilde{p}$ term is the spin-dependent lever. The diagnostic is $\chi=\partial^2\varepsilon_{\rm total}/\partial\xi^2$ at $\xi=0$: negative curvature means the unpolarized state is a local maximum, i.e., a ferromagnetic instability.

What would settle it

A first-principles calculation of the spin susceptibility of pure neutron matter between roughly $2n_0$ and $5.5n_0$, using chiral effective field theory or quantum Monte Carlo with three-neutron forces, that returns $\chi>0$ would falsify the instability; so would empirical pinning of $\tilde{p}$ to a positive value or to a magnitude below $0.002\,\mathrm{MeV\,fm^6}$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that quarkyonic matter, unlike conventional nuclear matter, can undergo a ferromagnetic instability at densities below about $5.5n_0$ in pure neutron matter. With the spin-dependent interaction $\tilde{p}(n^\uparrow_n-n^\downarrow_n)^2$ in the potential, a negative $\tilde{p}$ makes spin asymmetry energetically favorable, and when that attraction beats the kinetic cost of polarizing the neutron shell, the spin susceptibility $\chi=\partial^2\varepsilon_{\rm total}/\partial\xi^2|_{\xi=0}$ goes negative. The paper identifies this as spontaneous ferromagnetism: spin-up and spin-down neutron Fermi momenta split with no applied field. Above roughly $5.5n_0$, kinetic and Pauli pressure dominate and the susceptibility returns positive, so the ferromagnetic window sits in the intermediate densities typical of neutron star cores. The claim is deliberately independent of protons: the mechanism lives in the quarkyonic momentum-shell structure plus the neutron spin-spin attraction.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the neutron spin-dependent interaction parameter $\tilde{p}$ is negative and about $-0.002\,\mathrm{MeV\,fm^6}$; the paper admits this quantity is poorly constrained and the chosen value is precisely what makes $\chi$ negative, while the additional assumption that quarks stay unpolarized is not quantified.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Below about $5.5n_0$, with $\tilde{p}=-0.002\,\mathrm{MeV\,fm^6}$, pure neutron quarkyonic matter has $\chi<0$, so spin polarization would develop spontaneously without an applied field.
  • Above about $5.5n_0$, the susceptibility is positive again, so the ferromagnetic state is confined to the intermediate-density region relevant to neutron star cores.
  • The instability is driven by the neutron component and does not require protons, so the paper expects it to persist in beta-equilibrium matter where the proton fraction stays below about 10%.
  • Spin polarization stiffens the equation of state and raises the sound speed, so if such polarization occurs, neutron star radii and maximum masses would differ from unpolarized quarkyonic predictions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the instability holds up, the sign and magnitude of $\tilde{p}$ become a decisive input for magnetar modeling: a ferromagnetic core would supply spontaneous magnetization and alter field decay and crust-field coupling in ways current magneto-thermal evolution codes do not include.
  • The paper's assumption that quarks remain unpolarized is untested; if quarks acquire even a small spin susceptibility, the net $\chi$ becomes a weighted average and the predicted $5.5n_0$ boundary could shift.
  • A direct way to narrow $\tilde{p}$ would be to compare the model's neutron-star mass-radius predictions with pulsar timing constraints, since the ferromagnetic window also stiffens the EOS and changes the radius at a given mass.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper extends the quarkyonic matter model to spin-polarized pure neutron matter. It introduces a spin-dependent interaction term p̃(n_up - n_down)^2 in the neutron interaction energy, defines the spin susceptibility as the second derivative of the total energy density with respect to the polarization parameter ξ at ξ=0, and finds that for p̃ = -0.002 MeV fm^6 the susceptibility becomes negative below about 5.5 n0. The paper interprets this as a ferromagnetic instability in pure neutron matter, with implications for neutron star magnetism and magnetars. The framework is presented transparently, and the authors explicitly acknowledge that p̃ is poorly constrained experimentally.

Significance. If the result were robust, it would be an interesting qualitative new magnetic response of quarkyonic matter, distinct from conventional nuclear matter and potentially relevant to neutron star and magnetar physics. The model is clearly laid out, the figures support the numerical statements, and the authors are candid about the uncertainty in p̃. However, because the sign and magnitude of p̃ are effectively chosen by hand, because the susceptibility is not defined with respect to a specified thermodynamic ensemble, and because quark spin polarization is neglected without a quantitative estimate, the central quantitative claim is not yet established. The paper is best read as a conditional demonstration rather than a prediction.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III, Eq. (16); Sec. IV; Fig. 5] The reported value of p̃ is internally inconsistent by an order of magnitude: Sec. III and Fig. 5 use p̃ = -0.002 MeV fm^6, while Sec. IV states p̃ = -0.02 MeV fm^6. This discrepancy changes the magnitude and density range of the predicted negative susceptibility and must be resolved before the abstract's claim can be evaluated. In addition, the negative susceptibility is essentially put in by hand: for p̃ < 0 the term p̃(n_up - n_down)^2 in Eq. (16) lowers the energy with increasing polarization, and its second derivative at ξ=0 is negative. The paper provides no microscopic derivation, experimental constraint, or Fermi-liquid estimate for p̃, and it explicitly states that p̃ is poorly constrained. The calculation therefore demonstrates that a sufficiently attractive spin-dependent interaction produces an instability, but it does not establish that quarkyonic matter in nature is ferromagnetic. The authors should either supply an independent estimate of p̃ or reframe the central claim as a conditional statement.
  2. [Sec. III, Eq. (22) and Eq. (17)] The spin susceptibility is defined as χ = ∂²ε_total/∂ξ²|ξ=0, but the manuscript does not specify whether this derivative is taken at fixed baryon density n_B or at fixed k_FB. In Eq. (17), the neutron density n_n depends on ξ through k↑_FB and k↓_FB, while Eq. (10) defines these momenta with a fixed k_FB. If k_FB is held fixed, then n_B = n_n + n_Q changes with ξ, and the curvature is not the fixed-density spin susceptibility used in the ferromagnetic-instability criterion. If instead n_B is held fixed, k_FB must be recomputed as a function of ξ and the derivative must include that dependence. The paper does not state which convention is used, and the sign, magnitude, and critical density of χ depend on this choice. This needs to be clarified and, if necessary, the calculation redone at fixed n_B.
  3. [Sec. III, paragraph after Eq. (13)] The assumption that quarks remain completely unpolarized is motivated by Pauli blocking, but no quantitative estimate of the quark spin susceptibility is given. At densities near and above 5.5 n0 the quark Fermi sea is substantial, and a positive quark contribution to χ could partially or fully cancel the negative neutron contribution. Without at least an estimate using the same free-quark model, the claim that the ferromagnetic instability survives in the full quarkyonic system is not supported.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III, Eq. (14)] The relation k_Fd = (k_FB - Δ)/3 is introduced without derivation; please explain how it follows from the quarkyonic shell structure and charge neutrality in pure neutron matter.
  2. [Sec. III, Fig. 5 caption and text] The text says 'blck dotted curve' instead of 'black dotted curve'; also, the lower right panel should state the units of χ and explicitly define n0 in the caption.
  3. [Sec. III, Eq. (22) and Fig. 5] Figure 5 fixes ξ = 0.06 when showing the equation of state and energy density, while the susceptibility is evaluated at ξ = 0; please clarify why a finite polarization is used for the EOS panels and whether the plotted χ is consistent with the same thermodynamic state.
  4. [Sec. IV, Summary] The summary repeats the p̃ = -0.02 MeV fm^6 value without noting that the body and figures use -0.002 MeV fm^6; this should be corrected in addition to the underlying numerical choice.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 7.0 of 10

The claimed ferromagnetic instability is imposed by the unconstrained sign of p̃; only the density threshold is genuinely computed.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. III, Eqs. (16) and (22), Fig. 5 lower-right panel]
    "Note that p̃ is less-well-constrained experimentally, as it requires knowledge of spin-dependent nuclear interactions at high densities. The sign of p̃ determines whether polarization is energetically favorable (negative p̃) or costly (positive p̃). ... When p̃ = −0.002 MeV·fm6, we observe that χ becomes negative at densities below approximately 5.5n0 before returning to positive values at higher densities."

    The central 'prediction' of ferromagnetism is encoded in the input ansatz. Eq. (16) adds p̃(n↑n − n↓n)² to V_n, and Eq. (22) defines χ as ∂²ε_total/∂ξ²|ξ=0. The second derivative of the p̃ term is 2p̃(∂(n↑n−n↓n)/∂ξ)², so any negative p̃ automatically gives a negative contribution to χ. The paper first concedes that p̃ is 'less-well-constrained experimentally', then selects p̃ = −0.002 — the sign and magnitude that makes χ negative in Fig. 5 — and reports negative χ as a finding. The qualitative instability is therefore a restatement of the chosen sign of the unconstrained input; a positive or much smaller p̃ would eliminate it. What is not circular is the computed density threshold (~5.5n0) at which the imposed spin attraction is overcome by kinetic curvature.

full rationale

The paper's flag is legitimate but partial. The negative spin susceptibility below ~5.5n0 is not derived from an independently constrained spin-dependent interaction; it is the direct consequence of choosing p̃ < 0 in Eq. (16), as the paper itself acknowledges ('The sign of p̃ determines whether polarization is energetically favorable'). The result is thus a conditional demonstration rather than a first-principles prediction: if attractive spin-spin neutron interactions of that strength exist, the model produces a ferromagnetic instability. The density threshold and the return to paramagnetism at higher density are genuinely computed from the quarkyonic shell structure, so the calculation is not content-free. Two flagged issues amplify the fragility but are not circularity per se: Sec. IV (Summary) quotes p̃ = −0.02 MeV·fm6, an order of magnitude larger than the p̃ = −0.002 MeV·fm6 used in Sec. III and Fig. 5, and Sec. IV again states that p̃ 'remains poorly constrained experimentally'. I found no load-bearing self-citation chain, no uniqueness-theorem circularity, and no ansatz-smuggled-via-citation step: the quarkyonic framework is cited from the literature and the p̃ term is introduced openly as a poorly constrained parameter. Score 7 reflects that the central qualitative conclusion reduces to the chosen input sign, while the quantitative threshold retains independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumed p-tilde term and the quarkyonic shell construction. No genuinely new entity is introduced; the burden is carried by free parameters and domain assumptions inherited from the quarkyonic model.

free parameters (2)
  • p-tilde (spin-dependent interaction strength) = 0, +0.002, -0.002 MeV.fm^6 (tested values)
    The spin-dependent interaction parameter is chosen by hand; the ferromagnetic instability appears only for the negative value. It is described as poorly constrained experimentally.
  • alpha (momentum shell parameter) = 1.5
    Fixed at 1.5, between the values used in prior literature (alpha=1 in Ref. [32], alpha=2 in Ref. [28]). Affects the EOS but not the sign of chi.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Quarkyonic momentum shell Delta = Lambda_QCD (Lambda_QCD / k_FB)^alpha with Lambda_QCD = 300 MeV and alpha = 1.5
    Taken from the quarkyonic literature; the specific form and parameter values are inputs, not derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption Quarks remain unpolarized under spin polarization
    Justified by Pauli blocking; no quantitative estimate of the quark spin susceptibility is given to confirm suppression.
  • domain assumption Charge neutrality relations k_Fd = (k_FB - Delta)/3 and k_Fu = k_Fd / 2^(1/3)
    These relations connect quark and nucleon Fermi momenta for pure neutron matter; they are stated without derivation.
  • domain assumption Spin susceptibility is the second derivative of energy density with respect to xi at xi = 0
    The derivative conditions (fixed n_B vs fixed k_FB) are not specified; standard definition requires fixed baryon density.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ferromagnetic instabilities in quarkyonic matter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SLE2DQ6E

@misc{pith2026250706577,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ferromagnetic instabilities in quarkyonic matter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SLE2DQ6E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.06577}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the magnetic properties of quarkyonic matter, which naturally bridges nuclear and quark matter at intermediate densities relevant to neutron star cores. We extend the quarkyonic model to include spin polarization, where nucleons near the Fermi surface can be polarized while quarks in the deep Fermi sea remain unpolarized due to strong Pauli blocking. After including neutron interactions with spin-dependent terms, we find that quarkyonic matter can develop ferromagnetic instabilities at low densities, characterized by negative magnetic susceptibility. This ferromagnetic behavior occurs in pure neutron matter, independent of proton contributions, and results from the competition between attractive spin-dependent interactions and kinetic energy costs. The system returns to paramagnetic behavior at higher densities when Pauli pressure dominates. Our results demonstrate that the splitting of Fermi momenta of quarkyonic matter produces fundamentally different magnetic responses compared to conventional nuclear matter, with important implications for neutron star magnetism and magnetar physics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.06577 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Fermi sea structure in momentum space. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Pressure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Fermi sea structure in momentum space for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Pressure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Total energy density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Suppression of dynamical momentum-space shell by chiral symmetry

    nucl-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a parity doublet model, self-consistent minimization keeps the quark fraction at zero up to about 8n0, showing quark onset and chiral restoration need not coincide.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    J. M. Lattimer, The nuclear equation of state and neu- tron star masses, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 62, 485 (2012), arXiv:1305.3510 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2012

  2. [2]

    Hell and W

    T. Hell and W. Weise, Dense baryonic matter: con- straints from recent neutron star observations, Phys. Rev. C 90, 045801 (2014), arXiv:1402.4098 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2014

  3. [3]

    G. Baym, T. Hatsuda, T. Kojo, P. D. Powell, Y. Song, and T. Takatsuka, From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review, Rept. Prog. Phys. 81, 056902 (2018), arXiv:1707.04966 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    J. M. Lattimer and M. Prakash, The Equation of State of Hot, Dense Matter and Neutron Stars, Phys. Rept. 621, 127 (2016), arXiv:1512.07820 [astro-ph.SR]

    arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    ¨Ozel and P

    F. ¨Ozel and P. Freire, Masses, Radii, and the Equation of State of Neutron Stars, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 54, 401 (2016), arXiv:1603.02698 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    Recurring region for neutron-star observables

    A. Clevinger, Z. Lin, M. Albino, P. Hammond, V. Dex- heimer, and A. Steiner, Recurring region for neutron-star observables, (2025), arXiv:2506.24069 [astro-ph.HE]. 8

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    G. Baym, S. Furusawa, T. Hatsuda, T. Kojo, and H. Togashi, New Neutron Star Equation of State with Quark-Hadron Crossover, Astrophys. J. 885, 42 (2019), arXiv:1903.08963 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    T. Kojo, G. Baym, and T. Hatsuda, Implications of NICER for Neutron Star Matter: The QHC21 Equation of State, Astrophys. J. 934, 46 (2022), arXiv:2111.11919 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2022

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Minamikawa, T

    T. Minamikawa, T. Kojo, and M. Harada, Quark-hadron crossover equations of state for neutron stars: constrain- ing the chiral invariant mass in a parity doublet model, Phys. Rev. C 103, 045205 (2021), arXiv:2011.13684 [nucl-th]

    2021 arXiv

  2. [10]

    B. Gao, T. Minamikawa, T. Kojo, and M. Harada, Im- pacts of the U(1)A anomaly on nuclear and neutron star equation of state based on a parity doublet model, Phys. Rev. C 106, 065205 (2022), arXiv:2207.05970 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Minamikawa, B

    T. Minamikawa, B. Gao, T. Kojo, and M. Harada, Chiral Restoration of Nucleons in Neutron Star Matter: Studies Based on a Parity Doublet Model, Symmetry 15, 745 (2023), arXiv:2302.00825 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Y. K. Kong, T. Minamikawa, and M. Harada, Neutron star matter based on a parity doublet model including the a0(980) meson, Phys. Rev. C 108, 055206 (2023), arXiv:2306.08140 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    B. Gao, Y. Yan, and M. Harada, Reconciling constraints from the supernova remnant HESS J1731-347 with the parity doublet model, Phys. Rev. C 109, 065807 (2024), arXiv:2404.04786 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Y.-K. Kong, B. Gao, and M. Harada, Chiral Invari- ant Mass Constraints from HESS J1731 347 in an Ex- tended Parity Doublet Model with Isovector Scalar Me- son, (2025), arXiv:2506.16684 [nucl-th]

    2025 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Benic, D

    S. Benic, D. Blaschke, D. E. Alvarez-Castillo, T. Fischer, and S. Typel, A new quark-hadron hybrid equation of state for astrophysics - I. High-mass twin compact stars, Astron. Astrophys. 577, A40 (2015), arXiv:1411.2856 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Christian, J

    J.-E. Christian, J. Schaffner-Bielich, and S. Rosswog, Which first order phase transitions to quark matter are possible in neutron stars?, Phys. Rev. D 109, 063035 (2024), arXiv:2312.10148 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Gao, W.-L

    B. Gao, W.-L. Yuan, M. Harada, and Y.-L. Ma, Ex- ploring the first-order phase transition in neutron stars using the parity doublet model and a Nambu–Jona- Lasinio–type quark model, Phys. Rev. C 110, 045802 (2024), arXiv:2407.13990 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Kourmpetis, P

    K. Kourmpetis, P. Laskos-Patkos, and C. C. Mous- takidis, Confronting recent light compact star observa- tions with color-flavor locked quark matter, (2025), arXiv:2505.10329 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Verma, A

    A. Verma, A. K. Saha, and R. Mallick, Comparison of Equations of State for Neutron Stars with First-order Phase Transitions: A Qualitative Study, Astrophys. J. 985, 1 (2025), arXiv:2501.06453 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    W.-L. Yuan, B. Gao, Y. Yan, and R. Xu, Hybrid stars with large quark cores within the parity doublet model and modified NJL model, (2025), arXiv:2502.17859 [nucl-th]

    2025

  13. [21]

    Christian, I

    J.-E. Christian, I. A. Rather, H. Gholami, and M. Hof- mann, Comprehensive Analysis of Constructing Hy- brid Stars with an RG-consistent NJL Model, (2025), arXiv:2503.13626 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025 arXiv

  14. [22]

    McLerran and R

    L. McLerran and R. D. Pisarski, Phases of cold, dense quarks at large N(c), Nucl. Phys. A 796, 83 (2007), arXiv:0706.2191 [hep-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  15. [23]

    McLerran, K

    L. McLerran, K. Redlich, and C. Sasaki, Quarkyonic Matter and Chiral Symmetry Breaking, Nucl. Phys. A 824, 86 (2009), arXiv:0812.3585 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Hidaka, L

    Y. Hidaka, L. D. McLerran, and R. D. Pisarski, Baryons and the phase diagram for a large number of colors and flavors, Nucl. Phys. A 808, 117 (2008), arXiv:0803.0279 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Fukushima and T

    K. Fukushima and T. Kojo, The Quarkyonic Star, As- trophys. J. 817, 180 (2016), arXiv:1509.00356 [nucl-th]

    2016 arXiv

  18. [26]

    D. C. Duarte, S. Hernandez-Ortiz, K. S. Jeong, and L. D. McLerran, Quarkyonic effective field theory, quark- nucleon duality, and ghosts, Phys. Rev. D 104, L091901 (2021), arXiv:2103.05679 [nucl-th]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Kojo, Stiffening of matter in quark-hadron continu- ity, Phys

    T. Kojo, Stiffening of matter in quark-hadron continu- ity, Phys. Rev. D 104, 074005 (2021), arXiv:2106.06687 [nucl-th]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [28]

    McLerran and S

    L. McLerran and S. Reddy, Quarkyonic Matter and Neutron Stars, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 122701 (2019), arXiv:1811.12503 [nucl-th]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [29]

    K. S. Jeong, L. McLerran, and S. Sen, Dynamically gener- ated momentum space shell structure of quarkyonic mat- ter via an excluded volume model, Phys. Rev. C 101, 035201 (2020), arXiv:1908.04799 [nucl-th]

    2020 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Sen and N

    S. Sen and N. C. Warrington, Finite-temperature quarky- onic matter with an excluded volume model, Nucl. Phys. A 1006, 122059 (2021), arXiv:2002.11133 [nucl-th]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Fujimoto, T

    Y. Fujimoto, T. Kojo, and L. D. McLerran, Momentum Shell in Quarkyonic Matter from Explicit Duality: A Dual Model for Cold, Dense QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 112701 (2024), arXiv:2306.04304 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Zhao and J

    T. Zhao and J. M. Lattimer, Quarkyonic Matter Equa- tion of State in Beta-Equilibrium, Phys. Rev. D 102, 023021 (2020), arXiv:2004.08293 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Ivanytskyi, Quarkyonic picture of isospin QCD, (2025), arXiv:2505.07076 [nucl-th]

    O. Ivanytskyi, Quarkyonic picture of isospin QCD, (2025), arXiv:2505.07076 [nucl-th]

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Gao and M

    B. Gao and M. Harada, Quarkyonic matter with chiral symmetry restoration, Phys. Rev. D 111, 016024 (2025), arXiv:2410.16649 [nucl-th]

    2025 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Fujimoto, T

    Y. Fujimoto, T. Kojo, and L. McLerran, Quarkyonic matter pieces together the hyperon puzzle, (2024), arXiv:2410.22758 [nucl-th]

    2024

  28. [36]

    Fonseca et al., The NANOGrav Nine-year Data Set: Mass and Geometric Measurements of Binary Millisecond Pulsars, Astrophys

    E. Fonseca et al., The NANOGrav Nine-year Data Set: Mass and Geometric Measurements of Binary Millisecond Pulsars, Astrophys. J. 832, 167 (2016), arXiv:1603.00545 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  29. [37]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neu- tron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  30. [38]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi GBM, INTEGRAL, IceCube, AstroSat Cadmium Zinc Telluride Imager Team, IPN, Insight-Hxmt, ANTARES, Swift, AGILE Team, 1M2H Team, Dark Energy Camera GW-EM, DES, DLT40, GRA WITA, Fermi-LAT, ATCA, ASKAP, Las Cumbres Observatory Gro...

    2017 arXiv

  31. [39]

    M. C. Miller et al., The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton Data, Astrophys. J. Lett. 918, L28 (2021), arXiv:2105.06979 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  32. [40]

    T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, P. S. Ray, S. Bogdanov, S. Guillot, S. M. Morsink, A. V. Bilous, Z. Arzouma- nian, D. Choudhury, J. S. Deneva, K. C. Gendreau, A. K. Harding, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, M. Loewen- stein, R. M. Ludlam, C. B. Markwardt, T. Okajima, C. Prescod-Weinstei...

    2021

  33. [41]

    Fonseca et al., Refined Mass and Geometric Measure- ments of the High-mass PSR J0740+6620, Astrophys

    E. Fonseca et al., Refined Mass and Geometric Measure- ments of the High-mass PSR J0740+6620, Astrophys. J. Lett. 915, L12 (2021), arXiv:2104.00880 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Vinciguerra et al., An Updated Mass–Radius Analysis of the 2017–2018 NICER Data Set of PSR J0030+0451, Astrophys

    S. Vinciguerra et al., An Updated Mass–Radius Analysis of the 2017–2018 NICER Data Set of PSR J0030+0451, Astrophys. J. 961, 62 (2024), arXiv:2308.09469 [astro- ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Kacanja and A

    K. Kacanja and A. H. Nitz, A Search for Low-Mass Neutron Stars in the Third Observing Run of Ad- vanced LIGO and Virgo, (2024), arXiv:2412.05369 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Janka, Explosion Mechanisms of Core-Collapse Su- pernovae, Ann

    H.-T. Janka, Explosion Mechanisms of Core-Collapse Su- pernovae, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 62, 407 (2012), arXiv:1206.2503 [astro-ph.SR]

    2012 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Vigan` o, N

    D. Vigan` o, N. Rea, J. A. Pons, R. Perna, D. N. Aguilera, and J. A. Miralles, Unifying the observational diversity of isolated neutron stars via magneto-thermal evolution models, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 434, 123 (2013), arXiv:1306.2156 [astro-ph.SR]

    2013 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Chatterjee, T

    D. Chatterjee, T. Elghozi, J. Novak, and M. Oertel, Con- sistent neutron star models with magnetic field depen- dent equations of state, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.447, 3785 (2015), arXiv:1410.6332 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Dexheimer, B

    V. Dexheimer, B. Franzon, R. O. Gomes, R. L. S. Farias, S. S. Avancini, and S. Schramm, What is the magnetic field distribution for the equation of state of magne- tized neutron stars?, Phys. Lett. B 773, 487 (2017), arXiv:1612.05795 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Sedrakian and J

    A. Sedrakian and J. W. Clark, Superfluidity in nuclear systems and neutron stars, Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 167 (2019), arXiv:1802.00017 [nucl-th]

    2019 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Blaschke and N

    D. Blaschke and N. Chamel, Phases of dense matter in compact stars, Astrophys. Space Sci. Libr. 457, 337 (2018), arXiv:1803.01836 [nucl-th]

    2018 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Marcos, R

    S. Marcos, R. Niembro, M. L. Quelle, and J. Navarro, Magnetic susceptibility of neutron matter in a relativistic sigma + omega + pi + rho Hartree-Fock approach, Phys. Lett. B 271, 277 (1991)

    1991

  43. [51]

    C. Y. Cardall, M. Prakash, and J. M. Lattimer, Effects of strong magnetic fields on neutron star structure, As- trophys. J. 554, 322 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0011148

    2001 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Maruyama and T

    T. Maruyama and T. Tatsumi, Ferromagnetism of nu- clear matter in the relativistic approach, Nucl. Phys. A 693, 710 (2001), arXiv:nucl-th/0010018

    2001 arXiv

  45. [53]

    G. H. Bordbar, Z. Rezaei, and A. Montakhab, Investiga- tion of the field-induced ferromagnetic phase transition in spin polarized neutron matter: a lowest order con- strained variational approach, Phys. Rev. C 83, 044310 (2011), arXiv:1103.3690 [nucl-th]

    2011 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Kawaguchi, Y.-L

    M. Kawaguchi, Y.-L. Ma, and S. Matsuzaki, Magnetic field effect on nuclear matter from a Skyrmion crystal model, Phys. Rev. C98, 035803 (2018), arXiv:1804.09015 [nucl-th]

    2018 arXiv

  47. [55]

    J. A. Pons and D. Vigan` o, Magnetic, thermal and ro- tational evolution of isolated neutron stars, Liv. Rev. Comput. Astrophys. 5, 3 (2019), arXiv:1911.03095 [astro- ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Kawaguchi, I

    M. Kawaguchi, I. Siddique, and M. Huang, Effect of quark anomalous magnetic moment on neutral dense quark matter under magnetic field, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 246 (2025), arXiv:2408.14808 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Tatsumi, T

    T. Tatsumi, T. Maruyama, and E. Nakano, Ferromag- netism and superconductivity in quark matter: Color magnetic superconductivity, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 153, 190 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0312347

    2004 arXiv

  50. [58]

    J. Dong, W. Zuo, and J. Gu, Magnetization of neu- tron star matter, Phys. Rev. D 87, 103010 (2013), arXiv:1305.4533 [astro-ph.SR]

    2013 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Gandolfi, J

    S. Gandolfi, J. Carlson, S. Reddy, A. W. Steiner, and R. B. Wiringa, The equation of state of neutron matter, symmetry energy, and neutron star structure, Eur. Phys. J. A 50, 10 (2014), arXiv:1307.5815 [nucl-th]

    2014 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.