Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 35 references

Deterministic diffusion models for Lagrangian turbulence: robustness and encoding of extreme events

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that deterministic diffusion sampling (DDIM) makes extreme acceleration events in generated turbulent trajectories traceable to localized structures in the initial latent noise, while preserving multiscale statistics…

desk verdict Solid, reproducible results on architecture robustness and DDIM step reduction, but the abstract's claim that extreme events are 'encoded' in latent noise is not backed by the presented evidence and needs a proper control analysis. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.19103 v1 pith:SNXLTYD3 submitted 2025-07-25 physics.flu-dyn

Tianyi Li , Flavio Tuteri , Michele Buzzicotti , Fabio Bonaccorso , Luca Biferale This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords LagrangianturbulencediffusionmodelsDDIMextremeeventslatentnoiseintermittencyU-Nettransformer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether diffusion models of Lagrangian turbulence are robust to architectural choices and whether their rare, violent acceleration events can be explained. It establishes three things. First, a U-Net and a transformer-based diffusion model produce nearly identical trajectories when given the same sampling noise, with only mild small-scale differences favoring the U-Net. Second, using the deterministic DDIM sampler, extreme acceleration events (peaks beyond 50 standard deviations) align with localized spikes in the initial Gaussian latent noise, suggesting the model encodes rare events in its input. Third, with DDIM the generator keeps fourth-order intermittency statistics accurate when the number of denoising steps is cut from 800 to 25, whereas stochastic DDPM degrades. If these claims hold, diffusion models are not only scalable for turbulence synthesis but also interpretable: rare events can be located and potentially controlled in latent space.

What carries the argument

The engine of the paper is DDIM, the deterministic limit of a generalized diffusion process: setting the per-step variance to zero makes each backward transition a deterministic function of the current noisy state, so the standard-Gaussian initial latent fully determines the generated trajectory. This map lets the authors align many extreme-event trajectories in time and inspect the initial noise at the aligned location; the localized bump they find there is the evidence that extreme events are encoded in the latent. A second mechanism is subset-step generation, where a uniform stride schedule selects $M$ of the original 800 diffusion steps and reuses the same trained noise-prediction network; because DDIM's map is deterministic, the paper argues, error does not accumulate as it does for step-reduced DDPM.

What would settle it

Generate trajectories from many purely random latent vectors, align the latents at randomly chosen time points or at matched non-extreme events using the same procedure as the paper's Figure 6(c), and measure how often the same localized noise bump appears; if it appears as often as it does around true extreme events, the encoding claim is not specific to extremes. Alternatively, surgically remove the localized bump from the latent and check whether the corresponding extreme acceleration disappears.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the deterministic DDIM variant of the diffusion process gives a faithful and interpretable generative model for Lagrangian turbulence. In the zero-variance limit, the reverse denoising chain becomes a fixed map from the initial latent noise to the synthetic trajectory, so every output feature can be attributed to the input. The paper shows that acceleration bursts with $a_i/\sigma(a_i) \ge 50$ are mirrored by a consistent localized increase in the corresponding latent-noise component around the event time, and that the same deterministic formulation sustains multiscale accuracy, as measured by fourth-order extended self-similarity local slopes, down to 25 of 800 denoising steps, where stochastic DDPM sampling degrades. Architecture robustness is a secondary claim: under identical random seeds, U-Net and transformer outputs are highly correlated, with the transformer slightly underestimating small-scale intermittency.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the localized increase in the initial latent noise near extreme-event times is a genuine encoded structure rather than a chance alignment: the paper offers no comparison against random latent vectors, shuffled event times, or matched non-extreme events, and the 50-standard-deviation threshold is hand-picked.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single DDIM-trained model can generate statistically faithful Lagrangian trajectories at 32 times fewer network evaluations, making large-ensemble or real-time synthesis practical.
  • Extreme acceleration events can be traced to specific localized regions of the initial latent; if the mapping is stable, those regions become handles for targeted rare-event generation.
  • Because architecture choice has little effect on trajectory-level output, future scaling studies can freely replace U-Nets with transformers and expect the same physical statistics at intermediate and large scales.
  • The small-scale intermittency deficit of the untuned transformer marks the one place where architecture still matters, pointing to tuning as a likely fix.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the latent-bump result suggests a causal test: perturbing the localized latent structure around an extreme event should create, suppress, or shift the burst; the paper stops at correlation, so the causal direction is open.
  • Beyond the paper: the same alignment analysis could be run on Eulerian snapshots or on heavy and light inertial particles; if those extremes also localize in latent space, DDIM becomes a general tool for interpretable rare-event generation in turbulence.
  • Beyond the paper: the hand-picked threshold of 50 standard deviations could be replaced by a permutation test that shuffles event times and remeasures the bump; that baseline would tell whether the alignment is statistically significant rather than anecdotal.
  • Beyond the paper: DDIM's step-reduction robustness hints that deterministic samplers may generally be safer than stochastic ones when tail statistics matter, but the paper's error-accumulation explanation is plausible rather than proven.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper investigates three aspects of diffusion-based generative models for Lagrangian turbulence: (i) architectural robustness by comparing a U-Net with a transformer (DiT) backbone, (ii) the existence of structured signatures in the initial latent noise of deterministic DDIM sampling that align with extreme acceleration events, and (iii) the fidelity of accelerated generation using reduced-step schedules. Using DNS data at R_lambda ≈ 310, the authors train both architectures with the same hyperparameters and compare generated trajectories against DNS through structure functions, fourth-order flatness, ESS local slopes, and an uncertainty-weighted MSE. They report that U-Net and transformer produce highly correlated trajectories under identical sampling randomness, that DDIM preserves multiscale statistics down to 25 steps while DDPM degrades, and that extreme acceleration events (a_i/σ(a_i) ≥ 50) appear associated with a localized bump in the aligned initial latent noise (Fig. 6c). The paper concludes that diffusion models are robust, interpretable, and scalable tools for Lagrangian turbulence.

Significance. If the latent-encoding claim were solid, this would be a noteworthy interpretability result: deterministic diffusion sampling would connect rare physical events to identifiable structure in the generative prior, with implications for targeted sampling and controlled generation. The step-reduction and architecture-comparison results are also practically relevant, though more incremental given the existing literature on DDIM in image generation. The paper's strengths include reproducible code links, a clear quantitative framework (ESS local slopes, UW-MSE), and honest reporting of the transformer's small-scale shortcomings. The latent-extreme-event analysis, however, currently rests on a single visual inspection with no null baseline, which makes the paper's most distinctive central claim unsupported as presented. The other two findings are well-supported by the reported diagnostics and justify the paper's potential value after the latent-encoding evidence is strengthened.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2, Fig. 6(c)] The central claim that extreme acceleration events are encoded as structured features in the DDIM initial latent noise is supported only by visual inspection of aligned profiles. No null baseline is provided: the authors do not compare the average aligned latent noise against (i) random latent vectors conditioned on the same selection procedure, (ii) shuffled event times, or (iii) matched non-extreme events such as a_i/σ(a_i) in [10,20]. The number of selected events is not reported, and the threshold a_i/σ(a_i) ≥ 50 is hand-chosen. Because the selection protocol aligns at the maximum of a_i, and the DDIM map is deterministic and smooth, a localized bump in the average latent noise can arise even if the model has no global 'encoding' structure: conditioning on an extreme localized output statistically favors latent configurations with a localized increase at the aligned location. The conclusion in the abstract and Section 4 that rare events are encoded by specific variations in the generative prior therefore needs a quantitative null test to be sustained.
  2. [§3.1, Figs. 4–5] The architecture-robustness claim is stated as 'strong consistency' but the evidence shows statistically significant small-scale discrepancies for the transformer: TF-I underestimates F(4)_τ and ζ(4,τ) for τ/τη ≲ 2 (Fig. 4b–c). The cosine-similarity analysis in Fig. 5 uses identical random sequences for UN-P and TF-P, which measures alignment of the sampling trajectories rather than independent statistical equivalence; the high similarity is expected because both models are trained on the same data and start from the same noise. The authors do acknowledge the small-scale degradation, so this is a matter of calibration rather than correctness, but the 'robustness' framing should be tempered or supplemented with a statistical test (e.g., confidence intervals on the difference in ζ(4,τ) across independent seeds).
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.2, Fig. 6(c)] The vertical axis label 'V(η)_i' in the caption of Fig. 6(c) is likely a typographical rendering of the initial latent noise V_i^(N); it should be made consistent with the notation in Section 2.2.
  2. [§3.2, Eq. (15)] The bracket notation in the structure function definition is missing a closing parenthesis in the rendered text; while not affecting the science, it should be fixed.
  3. [§3.3, Eq. (20)] The UW-MSE definition integrates over τ, but the text does not specify the integration limits; assuming they are the full range shown in Fig. 7, this should be stated explicitly.
  4. [§2.4, Fig. 3] The noise schedule 'tan6-1' is not self-explanatory; a one-line definition (e.g., the functional form of the tanh-based schedule) would help readers not familiar with the authors' previous work.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: central claims are empirical checks against DNS data, not reductions to fitted inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

I walked the paper's derivation chain. The DDIM/DDPM generalized-process equations (Eqs. 2-14) are imported from Song et al. and Ho et al., with Appendix A deriving the coefficients; no equation defines a target statistic from a fitted parameter. Section 3.1 compares U-Net and transformer outputs against DNS structure functions, flatness, and ESS local slopes; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Section 3.2 identifies extreme acceleration events in generated trajectories and visually aligns them with initial latent noise; this is an empirical correlation claim, not derived from an input-output identity. It lacks a null baseline and event counts, so it is weak evidence, but it is not circular. Section 3.3 measures UW-MSE of ζ(4,τ) against DNS for reduced-step sampling, which is again an empirical benchmark. The self-citations (dataset, U-Net architecture, tan6-1 noise schedule from Li et al. 2024c) are references to prior code and data and are not load-bearing reductions. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz-by-citation, or renaming of a known result is present. Therefore the paper shows no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on trained generative models and on the choice of datasets, thresholds, and schedules. I counted the event threshold and diffusion schedules as free parameters because changing them changes the reported results. I did not count the millions of trainable network weights, because the paper's conclusions are about the modeling pipeline rather than a particular weight vector.

free parameters (4)
  • Extreme event threshold = ai/sigma(ai) >= 50
    Defines which events are analyzed in Sec 3.2; changing the threshold changes the selected event set and the apparent alignment in Fig. 6.
  • Uniform stride schedule = si = 1 + (N/M)(i-1)
    Chosen schedule for step reduction from Song et al. 2020; results depend on this selection because an alternative schedule degraded DDIM performance.
  • Diffusion steps N = 800
    Number of training and full sampling steps; the reduced M comparisons are defined relative to this baseline.
  • Noise schedule = tan6-1
    Predefined schedule from prior work (Li et al. 2024c); it sets the forward noising dynamics and affects all generated statistics.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The DNS dataset at Rlambda about 310 with 327,680 tracer trajectories is an accurate ground-truth representation of Lagrangian turbulence statistics.
    All fidelity claims compare generated trajectories to this dataset; if the DNS statistics are biased, the conclusions are relative to that bias. Source: Section 2.1.
  • domain assumption The trained noise-prediction network epsilon_theta is a sufficiently accurate approximation of the true denoiser for both DDPM and DDIM sampling.
    The paper does not verify convergence or approximation error of the learned score; all generation results assume this approximation. Source: Section 2.2 and Eq. (13).
  • standard math The uniform stride subset schedule preserves the optimality of the noise prediction network under the DDIM objective (Song et al. 2020).
    The step-reduction claims rely on this cited theoretical result, which is not re-derived in the paper. Source: Section 2.3.
  • standard math DDIM's zero-variance limit defines a deterministic mapping from initial latent noise to output trajectory (Song et al. 2020).
    The interpretability analysis depends on this determinism, taken from prior work. Source: Section 2.2.
  • ad hoc to paper A localized bump in the aligned latent noise at the extreme event time is a meaningful signature rather than a chance alignment.
    This is the core unvalidated premise of Section 3.2; the paper provides no null-model or statistical baseline for the alignment.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Deterministic diffusion models for Lagrangian turbulence: robustness and encoding of extreme events." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SNXLTYD3

@misc{pith2026250719103,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Deterministic diffusion models for Lagrangian turbulence: robustness and encoding of extreme events},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SNXLTYD3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.19103}
}
read the original abstract

Modeling Lagrangian turbulence remains a fundamental challenge due to its multiscale, intermittent, and non-Gaussian nature. Recent advances in data-driven diffusion models have enabled the generation of realistic Lagrangian velocity trajectories that accurately reproduce statistical properties across scales and capture rare extreme events. This study investigates three key aspects of diffusion-based modeling for Lagrangian turbulence. First, we assess architectural robustness by comparing a U-Net backbone with a transformer-based alternative, finding strong consistency in generated trajectories, with only minor discrepancies at small scales. Second, leveraging a deterministic variant of diffusion model formulation, namely the deterministic denoising diffusion implicit model (DDIM), we identify structured features in the initial latent noise that align consistently with extreme acceleration events. Third, we explore accelerated generation by reducing the number of diffusion steps, and find that DDIM enables substantial speedups with minimal loss of statistical fidelity. These findings highlight the robustness of diffusion models and their potential for interpretable, scalable modeling of complex turbulent systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.19103 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the diffusion process. (a) A sample trajectory. (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Graphical illustrations of the diffusion frameworks with a small number of steps [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview of the DiT-based architecture ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of Lagrangian statistics generated by different model architectures [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of generations from UN-P and TF-P using identical random se [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Analysis of extreme acceleration events and their latent noise signatures under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Multiscale statistical behavior under reduced-step sampling for (a) DDPM and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...

  2. [2]

    , author Bacry, E

    author Arneodo, A. , author Bacry, E. , author Muzy, J.F. , year 1998 . title Random cascades on wavelet dyadic trees . journal Journal of Mathematical Physics volume 39 , pages 4142--4164

    work page 1998

  3. [3]

    , author Benzi, R

    author Arn \'e odo, A. , author Benzi, R. , author Berg, J. , author Biferale, L. , author Bodenschatz, E. , author Busse, A. , author Calzavarini, E. , author Castaing, B. , author Cencini, M. , author Chevillard, L. , et al., year 2008 . title Universal intermittent properties of particle trajectories in highly turbulent flows . journal Physical review ...

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    , author Muzy, J.F

    author Bacry, E. , author Muzy, J.F. , year 2003 . title Log-infinitely divisible multifractal processes . journal Communications in Mathematical Physics volume 236 , pages 449--475

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    , author Ciliberto, S

    author Benzi, R. , author Ciliberto, S. , author Tripiccione, R. , author Baudet, C. , author Massaioli, F. , author Succi, S. , year 1993 . title Extended self-similarity in turbulent flows . journal Physical review E volume 48 , pages R29

    work page 1993

  6. [6]

    , author Boffetta, G

    author Biferale, L. , author Boffetta, G. , author Celani, A. , author Crisanti, A. , author Vulpiani, A. , year 1998 . title Mimicking a turbulent signal: Sequential multiaffine processes . journal Physical Review E volume 57 , pages R6261

    work page 1998

  7. [7]

    , author Boffetta, G

    author Biferale, L. , author Boffetta, G. , author Celani, A. , author Devenish, B. , author Lanotte, A. , author Toschi, F. , year 2004 . title Multifractal statistics of lagrangian velocity and acceleration in turbulence . journal Physical review letters volume 93 , pages 064502

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    , author Bonaccorso, F

    author Biferale, L. , author Bonaccorso, F. , author Buzzicotti, M. , author Calascibetta, C. , year 2023 . title Turb-lagr. a database of 3d lagrangian trajectories in homogeneous and isotropic turbulence . journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08662

    arXiv 2023

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    , year 2023

    author Buzzicotti, M. , year 2023 . title Data reconstruction for complex flows using ai: Recent progress, obstacles, and perspectives . journal Europhysics Letters volume 142 , pages 23001

    2023

  2. [10]

    , author Biferale, L

    author Calascibetta, C. , author Biferale, L. , author Borra, F. , author Celani, A. , author Cencini, M. , year 2023 . title Optimal tracking strategies in a turbulent flow . journal Communications Physics volume 6 , pages 256

    2023

  3. [11]

    , author Nichol, A

    author Dhariwal, P. , author Nichol, A. , year 2021 . title Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis . journal Advances in neural information processing systems volume 34 , pages 8780--8794

    2021

  4. [12]

    , author Beyer, L

    author Dosovitskiy, A. , author Beyer, L. , author Kolesnikov, A. , author Weissenborn, D. , author Zhai, X. , author Unterthiner, T. , author Dehghani, M. , author Minderer, M. , author Heigold, G. , author Gelly, S. , et al., year 2020 . title An image is worth 16x16 words: ...

    2020 arXiv

  5. [13]

    , author Jain, A

    author Ho, J. , author Jain, A. , author Abbeel, P. , year 2020 . title Denoising diffusion probabilistic models . journal Advances in neural information processing systems volume 33 , pages 6840--6851

    2020

  6. [14]

    , author Guth, F

    author Kadkhodaie, Z. , author Guth, F. , author Simoncelli, E.P. , author Mallat, S. , year 2023 . title Generalization in diffusion models arises from geometry-adaptive harmonic representations . journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02557

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    , author Voth, G.A

    author La Porta, A. , author Voth, G.A. , author Crawford, A.M. , author Alexander, J. , author Bodenschatz, E. , year 2001 . title Fluid particle accelerations in fully developed turbulence . journal Nature volume 409 , pages 1017--1019

    2001

  8. [16]

    , author Biferale, L

    author Li, T. , author Biferale, L. , author Bonaccorso, F. , author Buzzicotti, M. , author Centurioni, L. , year 2024 a. title Stochastic reconstruction of gappy lagrangian turbulent signals by conditional diffusion models . journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.23971

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    , author Biferale, L

    author Li, T. , author Biferale, L. , author Bonaccorso, F. , author Scarpolini, M.A. , author Buzzicotti, M. , year 2024 b. title Smartturb/diffusion-lagr: stable . https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10563386, :10.5281/zenodo.10563386

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    , author Biferale, L

    author Li, T. , author Biferale, L. , author Bonaccorso, F. , author Scarpolini, M.A. , author Buzzicotti, M. , year 2024 c. title Synthetic lagrangian turbulence by generative diffusion models . journal Nature Machine Intelligence volume 6 , pages 393--403

    2024

  11. [19]

    , author Lanotte, A.S

    author Li, T. , author Lanotte, A.S. , author Buzzicotti, M. , author Bonaccorso, F. , author Biferale, L. , year 2023 . title Multi-scale reconstruction of turbulent rotating flows with generative diffusion models . journal Atmosphere volume 15 , pages 60

    2023

  12. [20]

    , author Tommasi, S

    author Li, T. , author Tommasi, S. , author Buzzicotti, M. , author Bonaccorso, F. , author Biferale, L. , year 2024 d. title Generative diffusion models for synthetic trajectories of heavy and light particles in turbulence . journal International Journal of Multiphase Flow vo...

    2024

  13. [21]

    , author Hutter, F

    author Loshchilov, I. , author Hutter, F. , year 2017 . title Decoupled weight decay regularization . journal arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101

    2017 arXiv

  14. [22]

    , author Friedrich, J

    author L \"u bke, J. , author Friedrich, J. , author Grauer, R. , year 2023 . title Stochastic interpolation of sparsely sampled time series by a superstatistical random process and its synthesis in fourier and wavelet space . journal Journal of Physics: Complexity volume 4 , ...

    2023

  15. [23]

    , author L \"u bke, J

    author Martin, J. , author L \"u bke, J. , author Li, T. , author Buzzicotti, M. , author Grauer, R. , author Biferale, L. , year 2025 . title Generation of cosmic-ray trajectories by a diffusion model trained on test particles in 3d magnetohydrodynamic turbulence . journal Th...

    2025

  16. [24]

    , author Metz, P

    author Mordant, N. , author Metz, P. , author Michel, O. , author Pinton, J.F. , year 2001 . title Measurement of lagrangian velocity in fully developed turbulence . journal Physical Review Letters volume 87 , pages 214501

    2001

  17. [25]

    , author Dhariwal, P

    author Nichol, A.Q. , author Dhariwal, P. , year 2021 . title Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models , in: booktitle International conference on machine learning , organization PMLR . pp. pages 8162--8171

    2021

  18. [26]

    , author Xie, S

    author Peebles, W. , author Xie, S. , year 2023 . title Scalable diffusion models with transformers , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pp. pages 4195--4205

    2023

  19. [27]

    , year 2011

    author Pope, S.B. , year 2011 . title Simple models of turbulent flows . journal Physics of Fluids volume 23

    2011

  20. [28]

    , author Fischer, P

    author Ronneberger, O. , author Fischer, P. , author Brox, T. , year 2015 . title U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation , in: booktitle Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention--MICCAI 2015: 18th international conference, Munich, Ger...

    2015

  21. [29]

    , year 1991

    author Sawford, B. , year 1991 . title Reynolds number effects in lagrangian stochastic models of turbulent dispersion . journal Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics volume 3 , pages 1577--1586

    1991

  22. [30]

    , year 2001

    author Sawford, B. , year 2001 . title Turbulent relative dispersion . journal Annual review of fluid mechanics volume 33 , pages 289--317

    2001

  23. [31]

    , author Weiss, E

    author Sohl-Dickstein, J. , author Weiss, E. , author Maheswaranathan, N. , author Ganguli, S. , year 2015 . title Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics , in: booktitle International conference on machine learning , organization pmlr . pp. pages 2256--2265

    2015

  24. [32]

    , author Meng, C

    author Song, J. , author Meng, C. , author Ermon, S. , year 2020 . title Denoising diffusion implicit models . journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502

    2020 arXiv

  25. [33]

    , author Bodenschatz, E

    author Toschi, F. , author Bodenschatz, E. , year 2009 . title Lagrangian properties of particles in turbulence . journal Annual review of fluid mechanics volume 41 , pages 375--404

    2009

  26. [34]

    , author Friedrich, J

    author Viggiano, B. , author Friedrich, J. , author Volk, R. , author Bourgoin, M. , author Cal, R.B. , author Chevillard, L. , year 2020 . title Modelling lagrangian velocity and acceleration in turbulent flows as infinitely differentiable stochastic processes . journal Journ...

    2020

  27. [35]

    , year 2002

    author Yeung, P. , year 2002 . title Lagrangian investigations of turbulence . journal Annual review of fluid mechanics volume 34 , pages 115--142

    2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.