Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 103 references

Finiteness of the Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons action in linear covariant gauges by taking into account gauge copies

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A three-dimensional Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theory with infinitesimal Gribov copies removed has a trivial counterterm at all orders, so the theory is finite.

desk verdict Claims all-orders finiteness for RGZ-YMCS in linear covariant gauges, but the step that kills the A_h^4 counterterm is unproved and the stated BRST argument does not go through. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03284 v1 pith:SRGO7QZW submitted 2025-02-05 hep-th hep-ph

Daniel O. R. Azevedo , Antonio D. Pereira This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thhep-ph MSC 81T1381T15 PACS 11.15.-q11.10.Gh
keywords Yang-Mills-Chern-SimonsGribovcopieslinearcovariantgaugesalgebraicrenormalizationfinitenessrefinedGribov-ZwanzigeractionBRSTcohomologythree-dimensionalgaugetheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quantizing non-Abelian gauge fields requires picking one representative on each gauge orbit, and the Faddeev-Popov procedure misses configurations related by infinitesimal gauge transformations. This paper studies the three-dimensional Euclidean Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons action after those infinitesimal Gribov copies are removed in linear covariant gauges, including the dynamical condensates of the refined Gribov-Zwanziger construction. Its central claim is that this theory remains finite at all orders in perturbation theory: the most general counterterm allowed by power counting and by the BRST symmetries collapses to trivial terms. The proof uses the algebraic renormalization method, which is independent of any particular regulator. If the claim is correct, removing gauge copies and adding Chern-Simons and condensate mass parameters introduces no new ultraviolet divergences.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the gauge-invariant dressed connection $A_h = h^\dagger A h + (i/g)h^\dagger \partial h$, built from the gauge field and a Stueckelberg field $h=e^{ig\xi}$, which makes Gribov restriction compatible with BRST invariance in linear covariant gauges. Around it the paper constructs an extended nilpotent BRST operator $Q=s+\delta$ that places the gauge parameter $\alpha$ and several auxiliary fields into doublets, so those variables can only enter the trivial part of the cohomology. Superrenormalizable power counting in three dimensions bounds the invariant counterterm by dimension two and by powers $g^2$, $g^4$, $g^6$, and the Ward identities then reduce every candidate to the harmless form written in Eq. (64).

What would settle it

Compute, in the Landau gauge $\alpha=0$, the two-loop four-dressed-field amplitude $\langle A_h A_h A_h A_h\rangle$ with the RGZ-YMCS action; if it is divergent, or if any tensor $\lambda_{abcd}$ satisfying the full set of Ward identities is nonzero, the trivial-counterterm conclusion is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the refined Gribov-Zwanziger version of Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theory in three Euclidean dimensions, quantized in linear covariant gauges with the BRST-invariant dressed field $A_h$ and its localizing auxiliary fields, has a trivial invariant counterterm at all orders. The counterterm analysis with the extended nilpotent BRST operator $Q=s+\delta$ shows that every potentially nontrivial candidate either reduces to the Chern-Simons action, which is BRST invariant only in integrated form and lies in the trivial cohomology sector, or to a source term that is harmless after the physical limit. In particular, the four-dressed-field term $\lambda_{abcd}A_h^a A_h^b A_h^c A_h^d$ is forced to vanish in the $\alpha=0$ limit, where $A_h$ collapses to the ordinary gauge field and the Landau-gauge BRST symmetry survives. The counterterm action is therefore trivial, meaning the RGZ-YMCS theory is finite.

Load-bearing premise

The argument hinges on one asserted step: in the $\alpha=0$ limit the dressed gauge field collapses to the ordinary gauge field, which is then said to force the four-field counterterm coefficient $\lambda_{abcd}$ to vanish; this is stated after Eq. (63) without a computation, and a surviving $\lambda_{abcd}$ would make the counterterm nontrivial and ruin finiteness.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • All renormalization factors of the RGZ-YMCS theory are trivial, so no counterterms are needed at any loop order.
  • The finiteness property of ordinary Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theory survives the removal of infinitesimal Gribov copies and the inclusion of non-perturbative condensates.
  • Because the gauge parameter is introduced as a BRST doublet, the finiteness result holds for every linear covariant gauge, not only for the Landau gauge.
  • The competition between the Gribov parameter, the Chern-Simons mass, and the condensate parameters is defined at the quantum level without renormalization ambiguities, so the tree-level phase structure of the propagator is a genuine prediction of the quantum theory.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the finiteness statement could be tested directly by computing the two-loop gluon self-energy or the four-dressed-field amplitude in the Landau gauge; any divergence would signal a nonvanishing $\lambda_{abcd}$.
  • Beyond the paper: the same cohomological setup could be applied to the maximal Abelian gauge version of RGZ-YMCS, where the presence or absence of extra non-trivial cocycles would decide whether finiteness is specific to linear covariant gauges.
  • Beyond the paper: if the theory is indeed finite, it becomes a clean three-dimensional laboratory for comparing how Gribov copies shift gauge-invariant correlation functions, since no divergent subtraction is needed before physical predictions are extracted.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to prove that the refined Gribov-Zwanziger Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons (RGZ-YMCS) action, quantized in linear covariant gauges with elimination of infinitesimal Gribov copies, is finite at all orders in perturbation theory. The proof is placed in the algebraic renormalization framework: the authors introduce an extended nilpotent BRST operator Q, a complete set of external sources, and a list of Ward identities, and then characterize the most general invariant counterterm. They conclude that the only admissible counterterms are the integrated Chern-Simons action and a source term that is harmless in the physical limit, so the counterterm action is trivial and the theory is finite.

Significance. If the proof were complete, the result would be a valuable extension of the known finiteness of Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theory to the non-perturbative framework that removes infinitesimal Gribov copies. The paper's strengths are its detailed construction of the local but non-polynomial action, the extended BRST structure, the systematic list of functional identities, and the explicit statement of what must be checked in an all-orders algebraic proof. The authors also correctly emphasize that the Gribov and mass parameters are fixed by gap equations rather than fitted to the finiteness condition. However, the decisive cohomological step that eliminates the quartic dressed-field counterterm is only asserted, not derived, and the stated justification is, on inspection, insufficient. The central claim therefore rests on an unproved step, and the paper in its present form does not establish finiteness.

major comments (2)
  1. [IV, Eq. (63)] The elimination of the quartic counterterm λ_abcd A_h^a A_h^b A_h^c A_h^d is the load-bearing step for the finiteness claim, but it is not established. Since Q A_h^a = 0 by Eq. (29), the functional Δ_λ in Eq. (61) is automatically Q-closed for any λ_abcd, so BRST invariance alone does not select λ=0. The subsequent α→0 argument does not repair the gap: even if the dressed field reduces to the ordinary gauge field in the Landau slice, the counterterm is defined as a functional of A_h and the Stueckelberg-like field ξ, and setting ξ to zero is not a symmetry-preserving operation; it changes the Q-transformation property of the integrand. An additional Ward identity, for example following from the Stueckelberg equation or one of the W^i identities, that annihilates this cocycle must be exhibited. Without such a computation, a nonvanishing λ_abcd is allowed by the constraints listed in Eq. (57), and the claimed triviality of the counterterm action does not follow.
  2. [IV, Eq. (64)] The treatment of the integrated Chern-Simons counterterm proportional to a0 is too terse. The paper states that this term is not locally invariant and then cites Refs. [79,102,103] for the claim that it does not belong to the nontrivial cohomology. Since the final conclusion of finiteness depends on this exclusion, the authors should spell out how the a0 coefficient is absorbed into a renormalization of the Chern-Simons mass parameter and why this does not introduce a new physical coupling. Without this explanation, the reader cannot verify that the 'trivial counterterm' conclusion is not merely a statement that the coefficient can be redefined away.
minor comments (2)
  1. [II.B and IV] The paper repeatedly relies on the reduction A_h → A in the Landau slice and refers to the Appendix of Ref. [62]. Since this property is central to the λ_abcd argument, a brief derivation or a restatement of the precise sense in which the reduction holds would improve the self-containedness of the manuscript.
  2. [IV, Eqs. (54)-(55)] In Eqs. (54)-(55) the authors state that the coupling constant g is treated as an external field for power counting, following Ref. [101]. This is a nontrivial technical device and deserves a sentence explaining how it is compatible with the algebraic renormalization framework used later.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the finiteness proof does not fit parameters to its conclusion, and the disputed lambda A_h^4 counterterm elimination is a correctness gap, not an input-output identity.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the RGZ-YMCS action in linear covariant gauges has a trivial counterterm at all orders. No parameter is fitted to the finiteness condition: the Gribov and condensate parameters are fixed by their own gap equations, and the counterterm analysis imposes the same extended BRST and Ward identities that define the starting action. The conclusion therefore does not reduce by construction to its inputs. The most fragile step is the one-sentence elimination of lambda_abcd after Eq. (63), where the paper appeals to the alpha -> 0 limit and to 'BRST invariance' to set lambda = 0. This is a potential mathematical gap rather than a circularity: a nonzero lambda would falsify the conclusion, which shows the conclusion is not imposed by definition. The paper also relies on prior work by the same community, notably refs. [56], [62], and [84], for the dressed field A_h and the construction of the RGZ-YMCS action. Those citations are explicit, parameter-free constructions and known external results rather than unverified self-citations used to forbid alternatives; the present paper carries out the cohomological computation itself. Against the external benchmark that pure YMCS is finite, the paper confirms that the additional Gribov and condensate structure does not spoil that finiteness, which is an independent and falsifiable claim. Verdict: no significant circularity; the low score reflects only the heavy reliance on the authors' earlier construction framework.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central proof rests on the correctness of the RGZ-LCG construction from prior work and on the algebraic renormalization framework. It also depends on a specific suppression of the four-dressed-field counterterm and on the standard result that the integrated Chern-Simons term is cohomologically trivial. No numerical fitting is involved: the Gribov and mass parameters are inputs fixed by gap equations, and their values do not affect the finiteness argument. No new entities are introduced by this paper; the dressed field, Stueckelberg field, and auxiliary fields come from the cited RGZ-LCG framework.

free parameters (3)
  • Gribov parameter gamma^2 = gap equation
    Enters the action (8) as a mass-dimension-one parameter implementing the horizon condition. It is fixed self-consistently by a gap equation, not fitted to data, and the finiteness proof holds for arbitrary values.
  • Refining mass m^2 = gap equation
    Introduced for the dimension-two condensate of the dressed field. It is fixed by a gap equation in the RGZ framework and does not enter the finiteness argument as a fitted number.
  • Refining mass mu^2 = gap equation
    Introduced for the condensate of localizing auxiliary fields. Its value is determined self-consistently and is not used to force the finiteness conclusion.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The action (8) correctly implements the elimination of infinitesimal Gribov copies in linear covariant gauges for YMCS theories.
    The proof inherits the construction from [84] and [62]; this geometric fact is not rederived here, and the central finiteness claim applies to that particular action.
  • domain assumption The algebraic renormalization framework, including the quantum action principle and the linearized Slavnov-Taylor operator BQ, applies unchanged to the non-polynomial local action with Stueckelberg field A_h.
    Section III builds the action and Section IV classifies counterterms using BQ; the validity for this non-polynomial setting is carried over from [62,93] rather than proven here.
  • domain assumption In the Landau gauge limit alpha=0, A_h reduces to A and BRST invariance forces lambda_abcd=0, so the A_h^4 counterterm is absent.
    Stated after Eq. (63) as 'the only admissible value of lambda_abcd is zero' with no computation; this is the step that removes the only non-standard candidate counterterm.
  • standard math A functional that is BRST invariant only up to a total derivative, such as the integrated Chern-Simons term, is cohomologically trivial and cannot appear in the invariant counterterm.
    Used in Section IV to discard the a0 Chern-Simons counterterm, citing references [79,102,103].
  • domain assumption Setting external sources to their physical values preserves renormalization properties because the induced symmetry breaking is soft.
    Used to move from the extended action Sigma to the physical RGZ-YMCS action, citing Symanzik [99].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Finiteness of the Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons action in linear covariant gauges by taking into account gauge copies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SRGO7QZW

@misc{pith2026250203284,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Finiteness of the Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons action in linear covariant gauges by taking into account gauge copies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SRGO7QZW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03284}
}
read the original abstract

In recent years, the effects of removing infinitesimal Gribov copies from the path integral of gauge-fixed Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theories formulated in three-dimensional Euclidean space have been investigated. Part of the interest resides on the fact that such an elimination of gauge copies introduces a mass parameter, the Gribov parameter, which is relevant when the assumptions of the Faddeev-Popov procedure are not well-grounded. Such a parameter enters the propagator of the gauge field which is topologically massive due to the Chern-Simons term. The resulting action, which eliminates infinitesimal Gribov copies in this context, has been constructed in linear covariant gauges and the interplay between the aforementioned mass-parameters allows for a rich phase diagram in which confining and deconfining signatures are observed in the gauge-field propagator. In the present work, we establish the renormalization properties of such a theory at all orders in perturbation theory by means of the algebraic renormalization framework and show that the removal of infinitesimal Gribov copies does not affect the standard non-renormalization properties of standard gauge-fixed Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theories, i.e., the theory is finite.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [62]

    M. A. L. Capri, D. Fiorentini, A. D. Pereira, and S. P. Sorella, Renormalizability of the refined Gribov-Zwanziger action in linear covariant gauges, Phys. Rev. D 96, 054022 (2017), arXiv:1708.01543 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2017

  2. [80]

    O. M. Del Cima, D. H. T. Franco, J. A. Helayel-Neto, and O. Piguet, An Algebraic proof on the finiteness of Yang-Mills- Chern-Simons theory in D = 3, Lett. Math. Phys. 47, 265 (1999), arXiv:math-ph/9904030

    arXiv 1999

  3. [1]

    Yang and R

    C.-N. Yang and R. L. Mills, Conservation of Isotopic Spin and Isotopic Gauge Invariance, Phys. Rev. 96, 191 (1954)

    1954

  4. [2]

    Greensite, An introduction to the confinement problem , Vol

    J. Greensite, An introduction to the confinement problem , Vol. 821 (2011)

    2011

  5. [3]

    Brambilla et al

    N. Brambilla et al. , QCD and Strongly Coupled Gauge Theories: Challenges and Perspectives, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2981 (2014), arXiv:1404.3723 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2014

  6. [4]

    ’t Hooft and M

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, Regularization and Renormalization of Gauge Fields, Nucl. Phys. B 44, 189 (1972)

    1972

  7. [5]

    H. D. Politzer, Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1346 (1973)

    1973

  8. [6]

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Ultraviolet Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1343 (1973)

    1973

Show all 103 references
  1. [7]

    Faddeev and V

    L. Faddeev and V. Popov, Feynman Diagrams for the Yang-Mills Field, Phys. Lett. B 25, 29 (1967)

    1967

  2. [8]

    V. N. Gribov, Quantization of Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys. B139, 1 (1978), [1(1977)]

    1978

  3. [9]

    Singer, Some Remarks on the Gribov Ambiguity, Commun

    I. Singer, Some Remarks on the Gribov Ambiguity, Commun. Math. Phys. 60, 7 (1978)

    1978

  4. [10]

    Dell’Antonio and D

    G. Dell’Antonio and D. Zwanziger, Every gauge orbit passes inside the Gribov horizon, Commun. Math. Phys. 138, 291 (1991)

    1991

  5. [11]

    van Baal, More (thoughts on) Gribov copies, Nucl

    P. van Baal, More (thoughts on) Gribov copies, Nucl. Phys. B369, 259 (1992)

    1992

  6. [12]

    Zwanziger, Local and Renormalizable Action From the Gribov Horizon, Nucl

    D. Zwanziger, Local and Renormalizable Action From the Gribov Horizon, Nucl. Phys. B323, 513 (1989)

    1989

  7. [13]

    M. A. L. Capri, D. Dudal, M. S. Guimaraes, L. F. Palhares, and S. P. Sorella, An all-order proof of the equivalence between Gribov’s no-pole and Zwanziger’s horizon conditions, Phys. Lett. B719, 448 (2013), arXiv:1212.2419 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Vandersickel and D

    N. Vandersickel and D. Zwanziger, The Gribov problem and QCD dynamics, Phys. Rept.520, 175 (2012), arXiv:1202.1491 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Cucchieri and T

    A. Cucchieri and T. Mendes, What’s up with IR gluon and ghost propagators in Landau gauge? A puzzling answer from huge lattices, PoS LA TTICE2007, 297 (2007), arXiv:0710.0412 [hep-lat]

    2007 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Cucchieri and T

    A. Cucchieri and T. Mendes, Constraints on the IR behavior of the gluon propagator in Yang-Mills theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 241601 (2008), arXiv:0712.3517 [hep-lat]

    2008 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Sternbeck, L

    A. Sternbeck, L. von Smekal, D. B. Leinweber, and A. G. Williams, Comparing SU(2) to SU(3) gluodynamics on large lattices, PoS LA TTICE2007, 340 (2007), arXiv:0710.1982 [hep-lat]. 16

    2007 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Dudal, S

    D. Dudal, S. P. Sorella, N. Vandersickel, and H. Verschelde, New features of the gluon and ghost propagator in the infrared region from the Gribov-Zwanziger approach, Phys. Rev. D77, 071501 (2008), arXiv:0711.4496 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  13. [19]

    Dudal, J

    D. Dudal, J. A. Gracey, S. P. Sorella, N. Vandersickel, and H. Verschelde, A Refinement of the Gribov-Zwanziger ap- proach in the Landau gauge: Infrared propagators in harmony with the lattice results, Phys. Rev. D78, 065047 (2008), arXiv:0806.4348 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Dudal, S

    D. Dudal, S. P. Sorella, and N. Vandersickel, The dynamical origin of the refinement of the Gribov-Zwanziger theory, Phys. Rev. D 84, 065039 (2011), arXiv:1105.3371 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Dudal, C

    D. Dudal, C. P. Felix, L. F. Palhares, F. Rondeau, and D. Vercauteren, The BRST-invariant vacuum state of the Gribov–Zwanziger theory, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 731 (2019), arXiv:1901.11264 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Cucchieri, D

    A. Cucchieri, D. Dudal, T. Mendes, and N. Vandersickel, Modeling the Gluon Propagator in Landau Gauge: Lattice Estimates of Pole Masses and Dimension-Two Condensates, Phys. Rev. D 85, 094513 (2012), arXiv:1111.2327 [hep-lat]

    2012 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Dudal, O

    D. Dudal, O. Oliveira, and P. J. Silva, High precision statistical Landau gauge lattice gluon propagator computation vs. the Gribov–Zwanziger approach, Annals Phys. 397, 351 (2018), arXiv:1803.02281 [hep-lat]

    2018 arXiv

  18. [24]

    G. P. de Brito and A. D. Pereira, Infrared gluon propagator in the refined Gribov-Zwanziger scenario at one-loop order in the Landau gauge, Phys. Rev. D 110, 074005 (2024), arXiv:2405.07779 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [25]

    B. W. Mintz, L. F. Palhares, S. P. Sorella, and A. D. Pereira, Ghost-gluon vertex in the presence of the Gribov horizon, Phys. Rev. D 97, 034020 (2018), arXiv:1712.09633 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  20. [26]

    G. P. de Brito, P. De Fabritiis, and A. D. Pereira, Refined Gribov-Zwanziger theory coupled to scalar fields in the Landau gauge, Phys. Rev. D 107, 114006 (2023), arXiv:2302.04827 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [27]

    Barrios, M

    N. Barrios, M. Pel´ aez, M. S. Guimaraes, B. W. Mintz, and L. F. Palhares, Ghost-gluon vertex in the presence of the Gribov horizon: General kinematics, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094039 (2024), arXiv:2402.17534 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Vandersickel, A Study of the Gribov-Zwanziger action: from propagators to glueballs , Other thesis (2011), arXiv:1104.1315 [hep-th]

    N. Vandersickel, A Study of the Gribov-Zwanziger action: from propagators to glueballs , Other thesis (2011), arXiv:1104.1315 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  23. [29]

    Becchi, A

    C. Becchi, A. Rouet, and R. Stora, Renormalization of Gauge Theories, Annals Phys. 98, 287 (1976)

    1976

  24. [30]

    Baulieu and J

    L. Baulieu and J. Thierry-Mieg, The Principle of BRS Symmetry: An Alternative Approach to Yang-Mills Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 197, 477 (1982)

    1982

  25. [31]

    Barnich, F

    G. Barnich, F. Brandt, and M. Henneaux, Local BRST cohomology in gauge theories, Phys. Rept. 338, 439 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/0002245

    2000 arXiv

  26. [32]

    Maggiore and M

    N. Maggiore and M. Schaden, Landau gauge within the Gribov horizon, Phys. Rev. D 50, 6616 (1994), arXiv:hep- th/9310111

    1994

  27. [33]

    Baulieu and S

    L. Baulieu and S. P. Sorella, Soft breaking of BRST invariance for introducing non-perturbative infrared effects in a local and renormalizable way, Phys. Lett. B 671, 481 (2009), arXiv:0808.1356 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  28. [34]

    Dudal, S

    D. Dudal, S. P. Sorella, N. Vandersickel, and H. Verschelde, Gribov no-pole condition, Zwanziger horizon function, Kugo-Ojima confinement criterion, boundary conditions, BRST breaking and all that, Phys. Rev. D 79, 121701 (2009), arXiv:0904.0641 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  29. [35]

    S. P. Sorella, Gribov horizon and BRST symmetry: A Few remarks, Phys. Rev. D 80, 025013 (2009), arXiv:0905.1010 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  30. [36]

    S. P. Sorella, Gluon confinement, i-particles and BRST soft breaking, J. Phys. A 44, 135403 (2011), arXiv:1006.4500 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  31. [37]

    M. A. L. Capri, A. J. Gomez, M. S. Guimaraes, V. E. R. Lemes, S. P. Sorella, and D. G. Tedesco, A remark on the BRST symmetry in the Gribov-Zwanziger theory, Phys. Rev. D 82, 105019 (2010), arXiv:1009.4135 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Lavrov, O

    P. Lavrov, O. Lechtenfeld, and A. Reshetnyak, Is soft breaking of BRST symmetry consistent?, JHEP 10, 043, arXiv:1108.4820 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  33. [39]

    Serreau and M

    J. Serreau and M. Tissier, Lifting the Gribov ambiguity in Yang-Mills theories, Phys. Lett. B 712, 97 (2012), arXiv:1202.3432 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  34. [40]

    Serreau, M

    J. Serreau, M. Tissier, and A. Tresmontant, Covariant gauges without Gribov ambiguities in Yang-Mills theories, Phys. Rev. D 89, 125019 (2014), arXiv:1307.6019 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  35. [41]

    Dudal and S

    D. Dudal and S. P. Sorella, The Gribov horizon and spontaneous BRST symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 86, 045005 (2012), arXiv:1205.3934 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  36. [42]

    A. D. Pereira and R. F. Sobreiro, On the elimination of infinitesimal Gribov ambiguities in non-Abelian gauge theories, Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2584 (2013), arXiv:1308.4159 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  37. [43]

    A. D. Pereira, Jr. and R. F. Sobreiro, Gribov ambiguities at the Landau-maximal Abelian interpolating gauge, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2984 (2014), arXiv:1402.3477 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  38. [44]

    P. M. Lavrov and O. Lechtenfeld, Gribov horizon beyond the Landau gauge, Phys. Lett. B 725, 386 (2013), arXiv:1305.2931 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  39. [45]

    M. A. L. Capri, M. S. Guimaraes, I. F. Justo, L. F. Palhares, and S. P. Sorella, Properties of the Faddeev-Popov operator in the Landau gauge, matter confinement and soft BRST breaking, Phys. Rev. D 90, 085010 (2014), arXiv:1408.3597 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  40. [46]

    Cucchieri, D

    A. Cucchieri, D. Dudal, T. Mendes, and N. Vandersickel, BRST-Symmetry Breaking and Bose-Ghost Propagator in Lattice Minimal Landau Gauge, Phys. Rev. D 90, 051501 (2014), arXiv:1405.1547 [hep-lat]

    2014 arXiv

  41. [47]

    P. Y. Moshin and A. A. Reshetnyak, Field-dependent BRST–antiBRST transformations in Yang–Mills and Gri- bov–Zwanziger theories, Nucl. Phys. B 888, 92 (2014), arXiv:1405.0790 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  42. [48]

    Schaden and D

    M. Schaden and D. Zwanziger, Living with spontaneously broken BRST symmetry. I. Physical states and cohomology, Phys. Rev. D 92, 025001 (2015), arXiv:1412.4823 [hep-ph]. 17

    2015 arXiv

  43. [49]

    Schaden and D

    M. Schaden and D. Zwanziger, Living with spontaneously broken BRST symmetry. II. Poincar´ e invariance, Phys. Rev. D 92, 025002 (2015), arXiv:1501.05974 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  44. [50]

    M. A. L. Capri, V. E. R. Lemes, R. F. Sobreiro, S. P. Sorella, and R. Thibes, The Influence of the Gribov copies on the gluon and ghost propagators in Euclidean Yang-Mills theory in the maximal Abelian gauge, Phys. Rev. D 72, 085021 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0507052

    2005 arXiv

  45. [51]

    M. A. L. Capri, V. E. R. Lemes, R. F. Sobreiro, S. P. Sorella, and R. Thibes, A Study of the maximal Abelian gauge in SU(2) Euclidean Yang-Mills theory in the presence of the Gribov horizon, Phys. Rev. D 74, 105007 (2006), arXiv:hep- th/0609212

    2006

  46. [52]

    M. A. L. Capri, V. E. R. Lemes, R. F. Sobreiro, S. P. Sorella, and R. Thibes, The Gluon and ghost propagators in Euclidean Yang-Mills theory in the maximal Abelian gauge: Taking into account the effects of the Gribov copies and of the dimension two condensates, Phys. Rev. D 77...

    2008 arXiv

  47. [53]

    M. A. L. Capri, A. J. Gomez, V. E. R. Lemes, R. F. Sobreiro, and S. P. Sorella, Study of the Gribov region in Euclidean Yang-Mills theories in the maximal Abelian gauge, Phys. Rev. D 79, 025019 (2009), arXiv:0811.2760 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  48. [54]

    M. A. L. Capri, A. J. Gomez, M. S. Guimaraes, V. E. R. Lemes, and S. P. Sorella, Study of the properties of the Gribov region in SU(N) Euclidean Yang-Mills theories in the maximal Abelian gauge, J. Phys. A 43, 245402 (2010), arXiv:1002.1659 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  49. [55]

    M. A. L. Capri, D. Fiorentini, and S. P. Sorella, Gribov horizon and non-perturbative BRST symmetry in the maximal Abelian gauge, Phys. Lett. B 751, 262 (2015), arXiv:1507.05481 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  50. [56]

    M. A. L. Capri, D. Dudal, D. Fiorentini, M. S. Guimaraes, I. F. Justo, A. D. Pereira, B. W. Mintz, L. F. Palhares, R. F. Sobreiro, and S. P. Sorella, Exact nilpotent nonperturbative BRST symmetry for the Gribov-Zwanziger action in the linear covariant gauge, Phys. Rev. D 92, 0...

    2015 arXiv

  51. [57]

    M. A. L. Capri, D. Fiorentini, M. S. Guimaraes, B. W. Mintz, L. F. Palhares, S. P. Sorella, D. Dudal, I. F. Justo, A. D. Pereira, and R. F. Sobreiro, More on the nonperturbative Gribov-Zwanziger quantization of linear covariant gauges, Phys. Rev. D 93, 065019 (2016), arXiv:151...

    2016 arXiv

  52. [58]

    M. A. L. Capri, D. Dudal, D. Fiorentini, M. S. Guimaraes, I. F. Justo, A. D. Pereira, B. W. Mintz, L. F. Palhares, R. F. Sobreiro, and S. P. Sorella, Local and BRST-invariant Yang-Mills theory within the Gribov horizon, Phys. Rev. D 94, 025035 (2016), arXiv:1605.02610 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  53. [59]

    M. A. L. Capri, D. Dudal, A. D. Pereira, D. Fiorentini, M. S. Guimaraes, B. W. Mintz, L. F. Palhares, and S. P. Sorella, Nonperturbative aspects of Euclidean Yang-Mills theories in linear covariant gauges: Nielsen identities and a BRST-invariant two-point correlation function,...

    2017 arXiv

  54. [60]

    A. D. Pereira, R. F. Sobreiro, and S. P. Sorella, Non-perturbative BRST quantization of Euclidean Yang–Mills theories in Curci–Ferrari gauges, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 528 (2016), arXiv:1605.09747 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  55. [61]

    M. A. L. Capri, D. Fiorentini, A. D. Pereira, and S. P. Sorella, A non-perturbative study of matter field propagators in Euclidean Yang–Mills theory in linear covariant, Curci–Ferrari and maximal Abelian gauges, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 546 (2017), arXiv:1703.03264 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  56. [63]

    M. A. L. Capri, D. Dudal, M. S. Guimaraes, A. D. Pereira, B. W. Mintz, L. F. Palhares, and S. P. Sorella, The universal character of Zwanziger’s horizon function in Euclidean Yang–Mills theories, Phys. Lett. B781, 48 (2018), arXiv:1802.04582 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Piguet and S

    O. Piguet and S. P. Sorella, Algebraic renormalization: Perturbative renormalization, symmetries and anomalies , Vol. 28 (1995)

    1995

  58. [65]

    Dudal, J

    D. Dudal, J. A. Gracey, S. P. Sorella, N. Vandersickel, and H. Verschelde, The Landau gauge gluon and ghost propagator in the refined Gribov-Zwanziger framework in 3 dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 78, 125012 (2008), arXiv:0808.0893 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Dudal, S

    D. Dudal, S. P. Sorella, N. Vandersickel, and H. Verschelde, The Effects of Gribov copies in 2D gauge theories, Phys. Lett. B 680, 377 (2009), arXiv:0808.3379 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  60. [67]

    M. S. Guimaraes, A. D. Pereira, and S. P. Sorella, Remarks on the effects of the Gribov copies on the infrared behavior of higher dimensional Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. D 94, 116011 (2016), arXiv:1608.06979 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  61. [68]

    M. Q. Huber, Correlation functions of three-dimensional Yang-Mills theory from Dyson-Schwinger equations, Phys. Rev. D 93, 085033 (2016), arXiv:1602.02038 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Witten, Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial, Commun

    E. Witten, Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial, Commun. Math. Phys. 121, 351 (1989)

    1989

  63. [70]

    Delduc, F

    F. Delduc, F. Gieres, and S. P. Sorella, Supersymmetry of the d = 3 Chern-Simons Action in the Landau Gauge, Phys. Lett. B 225, 367 (1989)

    1989

  64. [71]

    Blasi, O

    A. Blasi, O. Piguet, and S. P. Sorella, Landau gauge and finiteness, Nucl. Phys. B 356, 154 (1991)

    1991

  65. [72]

    Delduc, C

    F. Delduc, C. Lucchesi, O. Piguet, and S. P. Sorella, Exact Scale Invariance of the Chern-Simons Theory in the Landau Gauge, Nucl. Phys. B 346, 313 (1990)

    1990

  66. [73]

    G. V. Dunne, Aspects of Chern-Simons theory, in Les Houches Summer School in Theoretical Physics, Session 69: Topological Aspects of Low-dimensional Systems (1998) arXiv:hep-th/9902115

    1998 arXiv

  67. [74]

    Zanelli, Introductory lectures on Chern-Simons theories, AIP Conf

    J. Zanelli, Introductory lectures on Chern-Simons theories, AIP Conf. Proc. 1420, 11 (2012)

    2012

  68. [75]

    Deser, R

    S. Deser, R. Jackiw, and S. Templeton, Topologically Massive Gauge Theories, Annals Phys. 140, 372 (1982), [Erratum: Annals Phys. 185, 406 (1988)]

    1982

  69. [76]

    Deser, R

    S. Deser, R. Jackiw, and S. Templeton, Three-Dimensional Massive Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 975 (1982)

    1982

  70. [77]

    R. D. Pisarski and S. Rao, Topologically Massive Chromodynamics in the Perturbative Regime, Phys. Rev. D 32, 2081 (1985). 18

    1985

  71. [78]

    Giavarini, C

    G. Giavarini, C. P. Martin, and F. Ruiz Ruiz, Chern-Simons theory as the large mass limit of topologically massive Yang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys. B 381, 222 (1992), arXiv:hep-th/9206007

    1992 arXiv

  72. [79]

    O. M. Del Cima, D. H. T. Franco, J. A. Helayel-Neto, and O. Piguet, On the nonrenormalization properties of gauge theories with Chern-Simons terms, JHEP 02, 002, arXiv:hep-th/9711191

    arXiv

  73. [81]

    D. O. R. Azevedo, O. M. Del Cima, T. S. Dias, and E. D. Pereira, Interpolating gauge-fixing for Yang–Mills–Chern–Simons theory in D = 3, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 917 (2024), arXiv:2406.09515 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Canfora, A

    F. Canfora, A. J. G´ omez, S. P. Sorella, and D. Vercauteren, Study of Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theory in presence of the Gribov horizon, Annals Phys. 345, 166 (2014), arXiv:1312.3308 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  75. [83]

    L. C. Ferreira, A. D. Pereira, and R. F. Sobreiro, Hints of confinement and deconfinement in Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theories in the maximal Abelian gauge, Phys. Rev. D 101, 105022 (2020), arXiv:2004.06990 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  76. [84]

    L. C. Ferreira, D. R. Granado, I. F. Justo, and A. D. Pereira, Infrared propagators of Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theories in linear covariant gauges, Phys. Rev. D 104, 045007 (2021), arXiv:2106.16205 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  77. [85]

    C. P. Felix and C. W. Kao, Implications of the topological Chern-Simons mass in the gap equation, Phys. Rev. D 105, 094016 (2022), arXiv:2105.09133 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  78. [86]

    A. J. Gomez, S. Gonzalez, and S. P. Sorella, Chern–Simons–Yang–Mills system in presence of Gribov horizon with fundamental Higgs matter 10.1088/1751-8113/49/6/065401 (2015), arXiv:1509.08809 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  79. [87]

    R. F. Sobreiro and S. P. Sorella, A Study of the Gribov copies in linear covariant gauges in Euclidean Yang-Mills theories, JHEP 06, 054, arXiv:hep-th/0506165

    arXiv

  80. [88]

    M. A. L. Capri, A. D. Pereira, R. F. Sobreiro, and S. P. Sorella, Non-perturbative treatment of the linear covariant gauges by taking into account the Gribov copies, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 479 (2015), arXiv:1505.05467 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  81. [89]

    M. A. L. Capri, D. Fiorentini, A. D. Pereira, R. F. Sobreiro, S. P. Sorella, and R. C. Terin, Aspects of the refined Gribov-Zwanziger action in linear covariant gauges, Annals Phys. 376, 40 (2017), arXiv:1607.07912 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  82. [90]

    B. W. Mintz, L. F. Palhares, G. Peruzzo, and S. P. Sorella, Infrared massive gluon propagator from a BRST-invariant Gribov horizon in a family of covariant gauges, Phys. Rev. D 99, 034002 (2019), arXiv:1812.03166 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Zwanziger, Quantization of Gauge Fields, Classical Gauge Invariance and Gluon Confinement, Nucl

    D. Zwanziger, Quantization of Gauge Fields, Classical Gauge Invariance and Gluon Confinement, Nucl. Phys. B 345, 461 (1990)

    1990

  84. [92]

    Lavelle and D

    M. Lavelle and D. McMullan, Constituent quarks from QCD, Phys. Rept. 279, 1 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9509344

    1997 arXiv

  85. [93]

    M. A. L. Capri, D. Fiorentini, M. S. Guimaraes, B. W. Mintz, L. F. Palhares, and S. P. Sorella, Local and renormalizable framework for the gauge-invariant operator A2 min in Euclidean Yang-Mills theories in linear covariant gauges, Phys. Rev. D 94, 065009 (2016), arXiv:1606.06...

    2016 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Dudal, J

    D. Dudal, J. A. Gracey, V. E. R. Lemes, R. F. Sobreiro, S. P. Sorella, and H. Verschelde, Renormalization properties of the mass operator A(a)(mu) A(a)(mu) in three dimensional Yang-Mills theories in the Landau gauge, Annals Phys. 317, 203 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0409254

    2005 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Dudal, J

    D. Dudal, J. A. Gracey, R. F. Sobreiro, S. P. Sorella, and H. Verschelde, UV finiteness of 3D Yang-Mills theories with a regulating mass in the Landau gauge, Phys. Rev. D 75, 061701 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0612024

    2007 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Dudal, J

    D. Dudal, J. A. Gracey, S. P. Sorella, N. Vandersickel, and H. Verschelde, A Gauge invariant infrared stabilization of 3D Yang-Mills gauge theories, J. Phys. A 42, 085402 (2009), arXiv:0803.1378 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Knecht and H

    K. Knecht and H. Verschelde, A New start for local composite operators, Phys. Rev. D 64, 085006 (2001), arXiv:hep- th/0104007

    2001

  90. [98]

    Verschelde, K

    H. Verschelde, K. Knecht, K. Van Acoleyen, and M. Vanderkelen, The Nonperturbative groundstate of QCD and the local composite operator A(mu)**2, Phys. Lett. B 516, 307 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0105018

    2001 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Symanzik, Renormalizable models with simple symmetry breaking

    K. Symanzik, Renormalizable models with simple symmetry breaking. 1. Symmetry breaking by a source term, Commun. Math. Phys. 16, 48 (1970)

    1970

  92. [100]

    Piguet and K

    O. Piguet and K. Sibold, Gauge Independence in Ordinary Yang-Mills Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 253, 517 (1985)

    1985

  93. [101]

    Maggiore, O

    N. Maggiore, O. Piguet, and M. Ribordy, Algebraic renormalization of N=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills Chern-Simons theory in the Wess-Zumino gauge, Helv. Phys. Acta 68, 264 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9504065

    1995 arXiv

  94. [102]

    O. M. Del Cima, D. H. T. Franco, J. A. Helayel-Neto, and O. Piguet, Exact scale invariance of the BF Yang-Mills theory in three-dimensions, JHEP 04, 010, arXiv:hep-th/9803247

    arXiv

  95. [103]

    Barnich, A General nonrenormalization theorem in the extended antifield formalism, JHEP 12, 003, arXiv:hep- th/9805030

    G. Barnich, A General nonrenormalization theorem in the extended antifield formalism, JHEP 12, 003, arXiv:hep- th/9805030

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.