REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 53 references
A computational fluid dynamics model for the simulation of flashboiling flow inside pressurized metered dose inhalers
T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read The paper claims the first open-source CFD tool that quantitatively simulates the metered discharge of a pressurized metered dose inhaler, including flashboiling onset.
desk verdict The uploaded full text is an unrelated DNN paper, so the flashboiling CFD model is unreviewable; the abstract describes a plausible and potentially useful contribution that deserves a proper look once the correct file is posted. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The central objects are the Volume-of-Fluid method, a numerical technique that tracks which phase occupies each grid cell to represent the liquid-vapor interface, and a cavitation model that explicitly activates when pressure drops below saturation, representing flashboiling onset. The claim is carried by comparing the simulated internal flow and nozzle-exit quantities against experimental visualizations and orifice measurements. The open-source implementation matters because it makes the tool reproducible and reusable for design studies.
What would settle it
Run the open-source model on a device geometry whose orifice mixture density and phase-resolved flow rates are known from independent experiments that were not used to set any model parameter; if the predicted mixture density deviates beyond experimental uncertainty or the liquid-vapor split is wrong, the quantitative-prediction claim fails.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
Within a single CFD framework, the authors intend to capture the sequence of liquid propellant expansion, bubble nucleation, flashboiling, and two-phase flow through the nozzle during a metered-dose-inhaler actuation. The central discovery claimed is that a VOF formulation with an explicit cavitation sub-model can quantitatively predict the measured mixture density and separate liquid and vapor flow rates at the nozzle orifice for a standard device geometry. The paper positions this as the first computational tool of its kind for the metered discharge, in contrast with prior work that simulated isolated components or post-nozzle spray. The authors further claim the tool reproduces the internal fluid dynamics upstream of the atomizing nozzle, which is what makes systematic geometry optimization possible.
Load-bearing premise
The validation dataset (flow visualizations, mixture density, and liquid and vapor flow rates) is accurate, representative, and was not also used to tune the cavitation and numerical parameters whose sensitivity the paper examines.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- If the model is correct, device designers can screen actuator geometries in silico before machining prototypes.
- The model can supply upstream boundary conditions for nozzle atomization and spray simulations, linking internal flow to aerosol droplet size.
- The same VOF-plus-cavitation framework could extend to other propellant-driven dispensers, such as nasal sprays or fire extinguishers.
- Quantitative predictions of vapor fraction at the orifice could inform formulation and propellant choice without extensive bench testing.
- Open-source availability means the model can be reproduced and independently checked by other groups.
Reading between the lines
- Editorial note: the supplied full text is an unrelated manuscript on edge DNN training, so the validation claims of this abstract cannot be checked here and rest on the abstract alone.
- A testable extension would be to run the model on multiple actuator geometries with known experimental flow-rate differences; unless the model ranks the geometries correctly, quantitative agreement on one geometry would not demonstrate design utility.
- A deeper question the paper opens but does not resolve is whether a cavitation model calibrated on steady or single-phase flows can capture the transient nucleation dynamics of flashboiling; direct comparison of simulated bubble growth with high-speed visualization would settle this.
- If the claim generalizes, the CFD approach could connect device geometry to delivered aerosol dose, informing whole-lung dose prediction.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The abstract of arXiv:2508.02316 announces a first-of-its-kind open-source CFD model for the metered discharge in pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), combining the Volume-of-Fluid method with a cavitation model to represent flashboiling. The authors state that experimental flow visualizations and measurements of mixture density and liquid/vapor flow rates at the nozzle orifice were used to validate the model and assess sensitivity to modeling parameters, and that the model quantitatively predicts several aspects of the discharge dynamics and thermodynamics. However, the full text supplied for review is not this manuscript: it is arXiv:2508.02313v1, 'NMS: Efficient Edge DNN Training via Near-Memory Sampling on Manifolds,' an unrelated paper on edge deep neural network training. Therefore, the claims about the pMDI model cannot be checked against any equations, numerical details, validation data, figures, or tables in the submitted document.
Significance. If the claimed model were properly presented and validated, it would fill a real gap: pMDI performance depends on the two-phase flow upstream of the atomizing nozzle, and an open-source CFD tool that quantitatively reproduces mixture density and liquid/vapor flow rates would enable systematic actuator geometry optimization without extensive prototyping. The open-source aspect is a genuine strength, as would be any explicit validation against independent experimental measurements. However, the significance cannot be assessed from the submitted package: none of the supporting technical content is present, and the only assessable text leaves unresolved questions about how the validation data relate to model-parameter choices.
major comments (3)
- [Full text] The document supplied for review is not the manuscript described in the abstract. It is arXiv:2508.02313v1, 'NMS: Efficient Edge DNN Training via Near-Memory Sampling on Manifolds,' a machine-learning hardware paper with no connection to pressurized metered dose inhalers, Volume-of-Fluid methods, or cavitation modeling. Consequently, the central claim that the proposed VOF-plus-cavitation model quantitatively predicts mixture density and liquid/vapor flow rates cannot be checked against any model equations, discretization, solver settings, validation data, figures, or tables. This is a load-bearing defect that blocks technical review.
- [Abstract] The abstract states that experimental visualizations and measurements are 'employed to validate the model and assess the sensitivity of numerical results to modeling parameters.' This wording leaves open the possibility that cavitation-model coefficients and numerical parameters were adjusted to fit the same experimental data that are later quoted as validation. The manuscript must state, for each free parameter, whether it was set a priori from theory or prior literature, estimated from a separate calibration subset, or fitted to the validation data. Without that information, the word 'predict' in the central claim is not supported.
- [Abstract] The abstract's claim that the cavitation model 'explicitly account[s] for the onset of flashboiling' is not backed by any description of the physical closure. Flashboiling onset involves nucleation and thermal non-equilibrium, and a hydrodynamic cavitation source term fitted to discharge curves may not represent the rapid pressure letdown inside a pMDI. Even after the correct full text is supplied, the authors should state the governing equations and explain how nucleation and thermal effects are closed, or else restrict the claim to what the model actually represents.
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract] The abstract reports qualitative agreement with experiments but gives no error metrics (e.g., percentage bias, RMS error, uncertainty bounds) for the claimed quantitative predictions; such metrics should appear in the abstract or at least in the results section.
- [Title and metadata] There is a clear submission-package mismatch: the title and abstract describe a pMDI flashboiling CFD study, whereas the attached full text is an unrelated paper with a different title, authors, and subject. The correct source file should be attached before the manuscript can be reviewed.
Circularity Check
No circularity demonstrable: the supplied full text is an unrelated edge-DNN paper, so the CFD model's calibration, equations, and validation cannot be audited from the available evidence.
full rationale
The abstract alone does not establish circularity. It states that experimental visualizations and measurements of mixture density and liquid and vapor flow rates are 'employed to validate the model and assess the sensitivity of numerical results to modeling parameters.' This wording leaves open the possibility that sensitivity studies informed parameter choices that were then validated against the same data, but the abstract does not say that parameters were fitted to the validation data, and no equation, fitting procedure, or parameter table is available to confirm such equivalence. The submitted full text is arXiv:2508.02313v1, an unrelated manuscript on near-memory sampling for edge DNN training, not the flashboiling pMDI paper. Consequently, the model equations, cavitation closure, calibration protocol, and validation comparisons cannot be inspected. Under the rule that circularity may only be claimed when a specific reduction can be quoted and exhibited, no circular step can be identified from the available evidence. The honest verdict is therefore no demonstrated circularity, with the structural caveat that the correct full text is required before the calibration/validation relationship and cavitation closure can be assessed.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (1)
- Cavitation model coefficients and numerical parameters =
Not stated in the abstract
assumptions (3)
- domain assumption A Volume-of-Fluid representation captures the relevant multiphase flow structure inside the inhaler and nozzle during flashing discharge.
- domain assumption The cavitation model can represent the onset and development of flashboiling upon actuation.
- domain assumption The experimental measurements (flow visualizations, mixture density, liquid and vapor flow rates at the nozzle) are accurate and representative of the real device operation.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of A computational fluid dynamics model for the simulation of flashboiling flow inside pressurized metered dose inhalers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SYMXYQ2G
@misc{pith2026250802316,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: A computational fluid dynamics model for the simulation of flashboiling flow inside pressurized metered dose inhalers},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SYMXYQ2G}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.02316}
}
read the original abstract
In this work we present, for the first time, a computational fluid dynamics tool for the simulation of the metered discharge in a pressurized metered dose inhaler. The model, based on open-source software, adopts the Volume-Of-Fluid method for the representation of the multiphase flow inside the device and a cavitation model to explicitly account for the onset of flashboiling upon actuation. Experimental visualizations of the flow inside the device and measurements of the mixture density and liquid and vapor flow rates at the nozzle orifice are employed to validate the model and assess the sensitivity of numerical results to modeling parameters. The results obtained for a standard device geometry show that the model is able to quantitatively predict several aspects of the dynamics and thermodynamics of the metered discharge. We conclude by showing how, by allowing to reproduce and understand the fluid dynamics upstream of the atomizing nozzle, our computational tool enables systematic design and optimization of the actuator geometry.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[2]
Mask r-cnn,
K. He, G. Gkioxari, P. Doll ´ar, and R. Girshick, “Mask r-cnn,” in Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision , 2017, pp. 2961–2969
2017
-
[3]
An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,
A. Dosovitskiy, L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, D. Weissenborn, X. Zhai, T. Unterthiner, M. Dehghani, M. Minderer, G. Heigold, S. Gelly et al. , “An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929 , 2020
arXiv 2010
-
[4]
Shufflenet v2: Practical guidelines for efficient cnn architecture design,
N. Ma, X. Zhang, H.-T. Zheng, and J. Sun, “Shufflenet v2: Practical guidelines for efficient cnn architecture design,” in Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV) , 2018, pp. 116–131
work page 2018
-
[5]
An energy-and-area-efficient cnn accelerator for universal powers-of- two quantization,
T. Xia, B. Zhao, J. Ma, G. Fu, W. Zhao, N. Zheng, and P. Ren, “An energy-and-area-efficient cnn accelerator for universal powers-of- two quantization,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 1242–1255, 2022
work page 2022
-
[6]
Remap: A spatiotemporal cnn accelerator optimization methodology and toolkit thereof,
B. Zhao, T. Xia, H. Zhai, F. Ma, Y . Du, H. Chang, W. Zhao, and P. Ren, “Remap: A spatiotemporal cnn accelerator optimization methodology and toolkit thereof,” IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems , vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1691–1704, 2022
work page 2022
-
[7]
W. Zhao, G. Yang, T. Xia, F. Chen, N. Zheng, and P. Ren, “Hipu: A hybrid intelligent processing unit with fine-grained isa for real-time deep neural network inference applications,” IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems , vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 1980–1993, 2023. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO. 8, AUGUST 2021 12
work page 1980
-
[8]
Efficient dataset distillation using random feature approximation,
N. Loo, R. Hasani, A. Amini, and D. Rus, “Efficient dataset distillation using random feature approximation,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 13 877–13 891, 2022
work page 2022
-
[9]
Scaling up dataset distillation to imagenet-1k with constant memory,
J. Cui, R. Wang, S. Si, and C.-J. Hsieh, “Scaling up dataset distillation to imagenet-1k with constant memory,” in International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2023, pp. 6565–6590
work page 2023
Show all 53 references
-
[10]
Improved distribution matching for dataset condensation,
G. Zhao, G. Li, Y . Qin, and Y . Yu, “Improved distribution matching for dataset condensation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2023, pp. 7856–7865
2023
-
[11]
Gen- eralizing dataset distillation via deep generative prior,
G. Cazenavette, T. Wang, A. Torralba, A. A. Efros, and J.-Y . Zhu, “Gen- eralizing dataset distillation via deep generative prior,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2023, pp. 3739–3748
2023
-
[12]
Dataset condensation with distribution match- ing,
B. Zhao and H. Bilen, “Dataset condensation with distribution match- ing,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision , 2023, pp. 6514–6523
2023
-
[13]
Dataset quantization,
D. Zhou, K. Wang, J. Gu, X. Peng, D. Lian, Y . Zhang, Y . You, and J. Feng, “Dataset quantization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , 2023, pp. 17 205–17 216
2023
-
[14]
Nonlinear manifold learning in functional magnetic resonance imaging uncovers a low-dimensional space of brain dynamics,
S. Gao, G. Mishne, and D. Scheinost, “Nonlinear manifold learning in functional magnetic resonance imaging uncovers a low-dimensional space of brain dynamics,” Human brain mapping , vol. 42, no. 14, pp. 4510–4524, 2021
2021
-
[15]
The manifold ways of perception,
H. S. Seung and D. D. Lee, “The manifold ways of perception,” science, vol. 290, no. 5500, pp. 2268–2269, 2000
2000
-
[16]
Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding,
S. T. Rowes, “Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding,” Science, vol. 290, p. 232, 2000
2000
-
[17]
A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction,
J. B. Tenenbaum, V . d. Silva, and J. C. Langford, “A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction,” science, vol. 290, no. 5500, pp. 2319–2323, 2000
2000
-
[18]
Decoding brain states on the intrinsic manifold of human brain dynamics across wakefulness and sleep,
J. Ru ´e-Queralt, A. Stevner, E. Tagliazucchi, H. Laufs, M. L. Kringel- bach, G. Deco, and S. Atasoy, “Decoding brain states on the intrinsic manifold of human brain dynamics across wakefulness and sleep,” Communications biology, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 854, 2021
2021
-
[19]
Visualizing data using t-sne
L. Van der Maaten and G. Hinton, “Visualizing data using t-sne.” Journal of machine learning research , vol. 9, no. 11, 2008
2008
-
[20]
Dataset distillation,
T. Wang, J.-Y . Zhu, A. Torralba, and A. A. Efros, “Dataset distillation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.10959 , 2018
2018 arXiv
-
[21]
Remember the past: Distilling datasets into addressable memories for neural networks,
Z. Deng and O. Russakovsky, “Remember the past: Distilling datasets into addressable memories for neural networks,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 35, pp. 34 391–34 404, 2022
2022
-
[22]
Dataset condensation with gradient matching,
B. Zhao, K. R. Mopuri, and H. Bilen, “Dataset condensation with gradient matching,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.05929 , 2020
2006 arXiv
-
[23]
Dataset condensation via efficient synthetic-data parame- terization,
J.-H. Kim, J. Kim, S. J. Oh, S. Yun, H. Song, J. Jeong, J.-W. Ha, and H. O. Song, “Dataset condensation via efficient synthetic-data parame- terization,” in International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 2022, pp. 11 102–11 118
2022
-
[24]
Dream: Efficient dataset distillation by representative matching,
Y . Liu, J. Gu, K. Wang, Z. Zhu, W. Jiang, and Y . You, “Dream: Efficient dataset distillation by representative matching,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , 2023, pp. 17 314–17 324
2023
-
[25]
Active learning for convolutional neural networks: A core-set approach,
O. Sener and S. Savarese, “Active learning for convolutional neural networks: A core-set approach,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.00489 , 2017
2017 arXiv
-
[26]
Super-samples from kernel herding,
Y . Chen, M. Welling, and A. Smola, “Super-samples from kernel herding,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1203.3472 , 2012
2012 arXiv
-
[27]
An empirical study of example forgetting during deep neural network learning,
M. Toneva, A. Sordoni, R. T. d. Combes, A. Trischler, Y . Bengio, and G. J. Gordon, “An empirical study of example forgetting during deep neural network learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.05159 , 2018
2018 arXiv
-
[28]
Active learning by acquiring contrastive examples,
K. Margatina, G. Vernikos, L. Barrault, and N. Aletras, “Active learning by acquiring contrastive examples,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.03764 , 2021
2021 arXiv
-
[29]
Deep residual learning for image recognition,
K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2016, pp. 770–778
2016
-
[30]
Nessa: Near-storage data selection for accelerated machine learning training,
N. Prakriya, Y . Yang, B. Mirzasoleiman, C.-J. Hsieh, and J. Cong, “Nessa: Near-storage data selection for accelerated machine learning training,” in Proceedings of the 15th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Storage and File Systems , 2023, pp. 8–15
2023
-
[31]
Principal components analysis (pca),
A. Ma ´ckiewicz and W. Ratajczak, “Principal components analysis (pca),” Computers & Geosciences , vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 303–342, 1993
1993
-
[32]
Linear discriminant analysis,
P. Xanthopoulos, P. M. Pardalos, T. B. Trafalis, P. Xanthopoulos, P. M. Pardalos, and T. B. Trafalis, “Linear discriminant analysis,” Robust data mining, pp. 27–33, 2013
2013
-
[33]
Development of a multi-dimensional scale for measuring the perceived value of a service,
J. F. Petrick, “Development of a multi-dimensional scale for measuring the perceived value of a service,” Journal of leisure research , vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 119–134, 2002
2002
-
[34]
Selection of the optimal parameter value for the isomap algorithm,
O. Samko, A. D. Marshall, and P. L. Rosin, “Selection of the optimal parameter value for the isomap algorithm,” Pattern Recognition Letters , vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 968–979, 2006
2006
-
[35]
Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding,
S. T. Roweis and L. K. Saul, “Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding,” science, vol. 290, no. 5500, pp. 2323–2326, 2000
2000
-
[36]
Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation,
M. Belkin and P. Niyogi, “Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation,” Neural computation , vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1373–1396, 2003
2003
-
[37]
Feoktistov, Differential evolution
V . Feoktistov, Differential evolution. Springer, 2006
2006
-
[38]
Resource-aware distributed dif- ferential evolution for training expensive neural-network-based controller in power electronic circuit,
X.-F. Liu, Z.-H. Zhan, and J. Zhang, “Resource-aware distributed dif- ferential evolution for training expensive neural-network-based controller in power electronic circuit,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 6286–6296, 2021
2021
-
[39]
Hardware implemen- tation of multi-objective differential evolution algorithm: a case study of spectrum allocation in cognitive radio networks,
K. K. Anumandla, R. Peesapati, and S. L. Sabat, “Hardware implemen- tation of multi-objective differential evolution algorithm: a case study of spectrum allocation in cognitive radio networks,” International Journal of Innovative Computing and Applications , vol. 8, no. 4, pp....
2017
-
[40]
Field programmable gate arrays-based differential evolu- tion coprocessor: a case study of spectrum allocation in cognitive radio network,
K. K. Anumandla, R. Peesapati, S. L. Sabat, S. K. Udgata, and A. Abraham, “Field programmable gate arrays-based differential evolu- tion coprocessor: a case study of spectrum allocation in cognitive radio network,” IET Computers & Digital Techniques , vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 221– 234, 2013
2013
-
[41]
Soc based floating point implementation of differential evolution algorithm using fpga,
K. K. Anumandla, R. Peesapati, S. L. Sabat, and S. K. Udgata, “Soc based floating point implementation of differential evolution algorithm using fpga,” Design Automation for Embedded Systems, vol. 16, pp. 221– 240, 2012
2012
-
[42]
Performance evalua- tion of floating point differential evolution hardware accelerator on fpga,
R. Peesapati, K. K. Anumandla, and S. L. Sabat, “Performance evalua- tion of floating point differential evolution hardware accelerator on fpga,” in 2016 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON). IEEE, 2016, pp. 3173– 3178
2016
-
[43]
Solving the nonlinear power flow equa- tions with an inexact newton method using gmres,
A. J. Flueck and H.-D. Chiang, “Solving the nonlinear power flow equa- tions with an inexact newton method using gmres,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 267–273, 1998
1998
-
[44]
Universal chiplet interconnect express (ucie): An open industry standard for innovations with chiplets at package level,
D. D. Sharma, G. Pasdast, Z. Qian, and K. Aygun, “Universal chiplet interconnect express (ucie): An open industry standard for innovations with chiplets at package level,” IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1423–1431, 2022
2022
-
[45]
Pci express*(pcie*) 3.0 accelerator features,
J. Ajanovic, “Pci express*(pcie*) 3.0 accelerator features,” Intel Corpo- ration, vol. 10, pp. 2–2, 2008
2008
-
[46]
Dataset quantization with active learning based adaptive sampling,
Z. Zhao, Y . Shang, J. Wu, and Y . Yan, “Dataset quantization with active learning based adaptive sampling,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07268 , 2024
2024 arXiv
-
[47]
Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks,
M. Sandler, A. Howard, M. Zhu, A. Zhmoginov, and L.-C. Chen, “Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018, pp. 4510–4520
2018
-
[48]
Cacti 7: New tools for interconnect exploration in innovative off-chip memories,
R. Balasubramonian, A. B. Kahng, N. Muralimanohar, A. Shafiee, and V . Srinivas, “Cacti 7: New tools for interconnect exploration in innovative off-chip memories,” ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization (TACO), vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1–25, 2017
2017
-
[49]
Theta: A high-efficiency training accel- erator for dnns with triple-side sparsity exploration,
J. Lu, J. Huang, and Z. Wang, “Theta: A high-efficiency training accel- erator for dnns with triple-side sparsity exploration,” IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1034– 1046, 2022
2022
-
[50]
Generalized binary search,
R. Nowak, “Generalized binary search,” in 2008 46th annual Allerton conference on communication, control, and computing . IEEE, 2008, pp. 568–574
2008
-
[51]
Simulated annealing,
D. Bertsimas and J. Tsitsiklis, “Simulated annealing,” Statistical science, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 10–15, 1993
1993
-
[52]
Genetic algorithms,
J. H. Holland, “Genetic algorithms,” Scientific american, vol. 267, no. 1, pp. 66–73, 1992
1992
-
[53]
Particle swarm optimization,
J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, “Particle swarm optimization,” in Proceed- ings of ICNN’95-international conference on neural networks , vol. 4. ieee, 1995, pp. 1942–1948
1995
-
[54]
Ant colony optimization,
M. Dorigo, M. Birattari, and T. Stutzle, “Ant colony optimization,” IEEE computational intelligence magazine , vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 28–39, 2006
2006
Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.