REVIEW 3 cited by
Non-minimal (self-)running inflation: metric vs. Palatini formulation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We consider a model of quartic inflation where the inflaton is coupled non-minimally to gravity and the self-induced radiative corrections to its effective potential are dominant. We perform a comparative analysis considering two different formulations of gravity, metric or Palatini, and two different choices for the renormalization scale, widely known as prescription I and II. Moreover we comment on the eventual compatibility of the results with the final data release of the Planck mission.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Inflation with Nieh-Yan-like terms in metric-affine gravity
A generalized Nieh-Yan coupling in metric-affine gravity can restore the consistency of Palatini inflation with CMB observations and produce testable tensor-to-scalar ratios.
-
$\tilde\xi$-attractors in metric-affine gravity
A new class of metric-affine inflationary models, the ξ-tilde-attractors, reproduces Starobinsky inflation as a universal attractor in two strong-coupling limits.
-
Constant-roll $\beta$-exponential inflation: Palatini formalism
A parameter scan of constant-roll β-exponential inflation in Palatini R² gravity claims agreement with ACT/Planck contours, but the derivation is undermined by algebraic sign errors and an absent non-Gaussianity calculation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.