Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Rotational stability in nanorotor and spin contrast in one-loop interferometry in the Stern-Gerlach setup

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Spinning a nanorotor around the magnetic-field axis holds its spin coherence near perfect through a Stern-Gerlach loop.

desk verdict Classical gyroscopic stabilization for cylindrical nanorotors is solid, but the quantum contrast section uses the wrong libration frequency (omega0 instead of (I3/I)omega0), so the reported contrast exponents and temperature tolerances need revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15335 v2 pith:TAAFPT5G submitted 2024-12-19 quant-ph

Ryan Rizaldy , Tian Zhou , Sougato Bose , Anupam Mazumdar This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph PACS 03.75.-b42.50.-p76.30.Mi
keywords Stern-Gerlachinterferometrynanorotornitrogen-vacancycenterlibrationmodeHumpty-Dumptyproblemspincontrastgyroscopicstabilizationzero-fieldsplitting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the Humpty-Dumpty problem in Stern-Gerlach interferometry with rotating nanoparticles can be tamed by giving the nanorotor an initial spin around the magnetic-field axis. For a cylindrical nanorotor with an embedded NV spin, this gyroscopic stabilisation suppresses the libration-mode mismatch that otherwise erases spin contrast when the two arms of the interferometer recombine. The authors derive an upper bound on the angular mismatch that falls as $1/(I\omega_0^2)$ and a spin-contrast lower bound that approaches unity for rotation rates in the tens-to-hundreds of kilohertz range, for masses up to $10^{-15}$ kg. They also extend the contrast calculation to thermal initial states of the libration mode, showing that only modest cooling is needed. If correct, the result removes a major rotational obstacle for proposed matter-wave experiments with massive nanoparticles.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the libration mode $\beta$, the angle between the spin axis and the magnetic field, modelled as a harmonic oscillator around a spin-dependent equilibrium. The restoring mechanism comes from the rotational kinetic energy of a symmetric top with moments $I_1=I_2=I$ and $I_3\neq I$: the initial angular momentum $p_\gamma=I_3\omega_0$ generates a term whose curvature is $(I_3^2/I^2)I\omega_0^2$, so spinning the rotor stiffens the wobble mode. The paper converts all rotational mismatch into displacements of coherent states of this oscillator, and the spin contrast at the end of the interferometer is the overlap of those coherent states on the two arms, evaluated in closed form as a Gaussian in the Euler-angle mismatches and the libration amplitude.

What would settle it

Measure the spin contrast of a levitated cylindrical nanodiamond in a one-loop Stern-Gerlach interferometer as a function of the initial rotation rate $\omega_0$ in the $10$--$500$ kHz range, at fixed mass, magnetic field, and temperature. The paper predicts contrast rising toward unity with the specific $\omega_0$ dependence of Eq. (93); if contrast stays flat, falls, or follows a different power law as $\omega_0$ increases, the gyroscopic-stabilization mechanism is ruled out.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that an initial rotation $\omega_0$ about the symmetry axis of a cylindrical nanorotor, aligned with the embedded spin, stabilizes all three Euler angles during a one-loop Stern-Gerlach interferometer. In the linearized dynamics the libration angle $\beta$ moves in a harmonic well with a spin-dependent equilibrium $\bar{\beta}(s,t)=\beta_0+(I^2/I_3^2)\,s\mu B_z(t)\beta_0/(I\omega_0^2)$, and its amplitude at closure is bounded so that the mismatch between the two spin paths obeys $\delta\beta\lesssim(I^2/I_3^2)\,8\mu B_0\beta_0/(I\omega_0^2)$. The spin contrast is then bounded below by $C>\exp[-\delta\alpha^2\Delta p_\alpha^2/(2\hbar^2)-\delta\gamma^2\Delta p_\gamma^2/(2\hbar^2)-(I^4/I_3^4)\,16\mu^2B_0^2\beta_0^2/(\hbar I\omega_0^3)]$, with $\delta\alpha\approx-\delta\gamma$. Both contributions shrink as $\omega_0$ grows, so $10$--$500$ kHz rotations keep the contrast near unity for masses up to $10^{-15}$ kg, while the upper end of this window is set by the need to avoid Majorana spin flips and Rabi resonances.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative contrast predictions assume the wobble angle oscillates at the imparted spin rate $\omega_0$, even though the linearized Hamiltonian for a cylinder gives that wobble frequency as $(I_3/I)\omega_0$, so for non-spherical shapes the numerical contrast exponents shift by a shape-dependent factor.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Both $|+1\rangle$ and $|-1\rangle$ spin states can be used from the start, so the spatial superposition is not halved as in the $\omega_0=0$ protocol that must use $\{0,-1\}$.
  • The libration mismatch is bounded by a term $\propto 1/(I\omega_0^2)$, and the azimuthal mismatches obey $\delta\alpha\approx-\delta\gamma$ with magnitude $\propto 1/\omega_0$, so increasing the spin rate systematically shrinks every Humpty-Dumpty contribution.
  • Spin contrast stays near unity for rotation rates in the $10$--$500$ kHz range for masses up to $10^{-15}$ kg; thermal libration states require only moderate cooling, with $\omega_0\approx80$ kHz tolerating temperatures up to roughly $10^{-4}$ K.
  • Disk-shaped and normal cylinders are more stable than long cylinders at low mass, with disk shapes giving slightly better contrast, so the protocol is robust to cylinder geometry except at extreme aspect ratios.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Consistently using the small-oscillation frequency $(I_3/I)\omega_0$ rather than $\omega_0$ in the coherent-state amplitude would rescale the contrast exponents in Eqs. (93)--(96) by powers of $I_3/I$, improving the predicted contrast for disks and worsening it for long cylinders.
  • The same gyroscopic suppression should apply to any rigid body with a spin defect and axial zero-field splitting, not only nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, so the protocol could be transferred to other spin-carrying nanoparticles.
  • The $\omega_0^{-1}$ scaling of $\delta\alpha$ and $\delta\gamma$ and the relation $\delta\alpha\approx-\delta\gamma$ are distinctive predictions that a tabletop Stern-Gerlach experiment could test directly by measuring the final spin phase as a function of imparted rotation rate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript analyzes the rotation of a cylindrical nanorotor with an embedded spin in a Stern-Gerlach interferometer. It derives the classical Euler-angle dynamics, shows analytically and numerically that an initial rotation ω0 around the magnetic-field direction stabilizes the libration mode and bounds the Humpty-Dumpty mismatch, and then computes spin contrast from the overlap of Gaussian, coherent, and thermal states of the angular degrees of freedom. The central quantitative claims are the lower bounds in Eqs. (93) and (96) and the conclusion that kHz-range ω0 preserves contrast for masses up to 10^-15 kg, including a finite-temperature tolerance for the libration mode.

Significance. If the quantitative claims are correct, the paper would be a significant step toward practical nanorotor interferometry for QGEM-type proposals, providing analytic parameter-free predictions for cylindrical geometries and a thermal treatment. The explicit derivation of the classical bound Eq. (68), the numerical solution of the coupled Euler-angle equations, and the absence of fitted parameters are strengths. However, the quantum-contrast section contains a frequency mismatch that alters the reported exponents and the temperature thresholds, so the quantitative results as printed are not yet reliable.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section VI, Eqs. (75), (82), (93)-(96)] The shifted Hamiltonian in Eq. (75) is H ≈ p_β^2/(2I) + (I_3^2/I^2)(I ω0^2/2) β'^2 - f β' + g, so the small-oscillation frequency is Ω = (I3/I) ω0, not ω0. However, the initial ground state in Eq. (78) is declared to have frequency ω0, the coherent-state parameter in Eq. (82) uses sqrt(I ω0/(2ℏ)) and e^{-iω0 t}, and the thermal occupation in Eq. (94) is n = k_B T/(ℏ ω0). With Ω, the normalization becomes sqrt(I3 ω0/(2ℏ)), the phase becomes e^{-iΩt}, and the equilibrium shifts in Eqs. (79)-(80) acquire I Ω^2 = I3^2 ω0^2/I in the denominator. Consequently, the third exponent in Eq. (93) should be multiplied by I3/I, i.e. it becomes 16 I^2 μ^2 B0^2 β0^2/(I3^3 ℏ ω0^3) rather than the printed 16 I^4 μ^2 B0^2 β0^2/(I3^4 ℏ I ω0^3), and n in Eq. (96) should be k_B T/(ℏ Ω). This is load-bearing because the reported contrast values and the T_lib ≈ 10^-4 K tolerance in Section VII are computed from these exponents. The classical stabilization mechanism and the bound in Eq. (68) are not affected and remain the paper's solid core; the quantum section should be re-derived and the figures regenerated with Ω.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section V.D, after Eq. (59)] The sentence 'our approximation ω0 < μBz/I holds' is inconsistent with Eq. (61) and with the immediately preceding 'ω0^2 ≫ μBz/I'; this appears to be a typo and should read ω0 ≪ μBz/ℏ or ω0 ≫ sqrt(μBz/I).
  2. [Table I] The table labels D as 'Transversal NV Zero-field splitting' and E as 'Longitudinal NV Zero-field splitting', whereas the text defines D as the axial splitting and E as the transverse splitting; the labels are reversed.
  3. [Introduction and Section VIII] There are repeated typos: 'liberation mode' should be 'libration mode', 'one fell of soup' should be 'one fell swoop', and 'Humpty-dumpty' should be 'Humpty-Dumpty' for consistency with the cited literature.
  4. [Fig. 10 and Appendix D] The values ω0 = 2π × 10 GHz and '0 to 80 GHz' violate the constraints in Eq. (32) and are inconsistent with the rest of the paper; these should presumably be kHz and should be corrected.
  5. [Eq. (82)] The notation |... + \barβ> for a displaced state is nonstandard; the authors should write the coherent state explicitly as D(κ)|0>_{\barβ} to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the stabilization bound and spin-contrast exponent are re-derived from the rotor Hamiltonian and standard coherent-state overlaps; the disclosed self-citation is not load-bearing, and the Section VI frequency mismatch is a consistency error, not circularity.

full rationale

The central derivations are self-contained. The gyroscopic stabilization bound, Eq. (68), follows by Taylor-expanding the exact Euler-Lagrange equation (54) around the libration angle beta0, solving the resulting oscillator (62)-(63), and bounding the post-flip amplitude by the triangle inequality (66); no fitted parameter enters. The spin-contrast lower bound, Eq. (93), is obtained by quantizing the shifted Hamiltonian (75), forming coherent states whose displacement is the classical amplitude via Eq. (83), and evaluating the standard Gaussian overlap of two coherent states; the result is an analytic function of stated inputs (m, I, I3, omega0, B0, beta0). The paper explicitly builds on Ref. [66] by the same group, and Section VI notes 'we followed and modified the derivation of the spin contrast for the cylinder case. See Appendix D in ref. [66]'; however, the cylindrical dynamics and contrast are re-derived in the present text, and the overlap identities are standard and also cited to [88], so the self-citation is disclosed and not load-bearing. The only substantive issue in the derivation chain is internal: the Hamiltonian (75) has small-oscillation frequency (I3/I) omega0, while the coherent state in Eq. (82) and the thermal occupation number in Eq. (94) use omega0, altering the quantitative exponents in Eqs. (93)-(96). That is a correctness or consistency problem rather than circularity, because the predictions do not reduce to their inputs by definition or by fitting.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All parameters in the table are either experimental values or scanned inputs; none are fitted to data. The derivations rely on standard rigid-body and spin Hamiltonians with stated idealizations. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • initial libration angle beta0 = 0.01 rad
    Hand-chosen small misalignment angle; the analysis assumes beta0 << 1 and results scale as beta0.
  • momentum spread Delta_p_alpha, Delta_p_gamma = hbar, 10 hbar, 25 hbar (varied)
    Assumed Gaussian momentum widths of the Euler-angle wave packets; not measured, scanned to show contrast dependence.
  • libration temperature T_lib = 0 to 10^4 K (scanned)
    Initial thermal occupation n = k_B T_lib / (hbar omega0) is scanned; not fitted.
  • transverse ZFS E = 0 (main), up to D/3 (appendix)
    Set to zero in the main analysis and scanned in Appendix C; experimental value for NV centers is ~10 MHz.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Euler rigid-body dynamics and canonical quantization of angular degrees of freedom
    Used throughout Section IV-VI to derive the equations of motion and the contrast.
  • domain assumption NV spin Hamiltonian with axial and transverse zero-field splitting, spin locked to the NV crystal axis
    Eq. (3) plus the assumption that S remains aligned with n3; standard for NV centers but an idealization.
  • standard math Feshbach projection onto the |+-1> subspace valid for mu B, E << D
    Appendix A reduces the 3x3 spin Hamiltonian to an effective 2x2 form.
  • domain assumption Small-angle approximations beta0 << 1 and |beta - beta0| << beta0
    Used in Eqs. (57)-(70) and throughout the contrast derivation to linearize the dynamics.
  • domain assumption Adiabatic switching of the magnetic field profile and absence of Majorana/Rabi transitions
    Assumed in Section III and codified in the constraints Eq. (32) and Eq. (61).
  • domain assumption One-dimensional C.O.M. motion with x=0 fixed by a steep diamagnetic trap
    Stated after Eq. (9); the x-component of the field is set to zero.
  • domain assumption Narrow Gaussian momentum wave packets for alpha and gamma (Delta_p ~ hbar << I omega0)
    Section VI, used to drop f(p'_alpha,p'_gamma) corrections and factorize the contrast.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rotational stability in nanorotor and spin contrast in one-loop interferometry in the Stern-Gerlach setup." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TAAFPT5G

@misc{pith2026241215335,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rotational stability in nanorotor and spin contrast in one-loop interferometry in the Stern-Gerlach setup},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TAAFPT5G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15335}
}
read the original abstract

The rotation of a nanoparticle in a quantum system has many applications, from theory to experiments. This paper will treat nanoparticle rotational dynamics for spin-embedded nanorotors. We will model it as a rigid body that properly treats the rotation in the co-frame of the nanorotor in the presence of external fields. Besides rotation, we will further investigate how to create large spatial superpositions in the inhomogeneous external magnetic field, such as in the case of the Stern-Gerlach apparatus. The spin-embedded nanorotors play a crucial role in creating matter-wave interferometers through their spin and external magnetic field interaction Hamiltonian. We aim to provide a holistic interpretation of the dynamics of three Euler angles, their quantum evolution, and the nanorotor's spatial motion in a Stern-Gerlach-type setup where we will consider one-full-loop interferometry. We will then study how the quantum evolution of all the Euler angles leads to a spin coherence loss upon interference and what manifests the Einstein-de Haas effect in an external magnetic field. In particular, we show that by imparting rotation along the direction of the magnetic field, we can stabilise the nanorotor's libration mode. We will also extend our analysis to a case where the initial state of the libration mode is thermal and discuss the contrast loss due to interference of the nanorotor upon one-loop completion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.15335 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A side view of a transversal one-loop Stern-Gerlach Interferometer (SGI), z-direction vs time, based on Ref. [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Euler classical coordinate with angle (α, β, γ), blue line define as fixed coordinate system (eˆx, eˆy, eˆz), red line as rotated coordinate (nˆ1, nˆ2, nˆ3), and green line as line of nodes (N). The sketch (b) in the right side are the cylinder nanorotor with off-centered spin fixed in the crystal, where the spin axis nˆs is parallel to nˆ3. β is the angle between spin-axis and z-axis, α ′ is fix angle between N… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Solution of Eq. (54) with initial angle and rotation are β0 = 0.01 rad and ω0 = 2π × 10 kHz, respectively. black and red trajectories represent libration mode β(t) for spin-up and -down, respectively. Furthermore, we represent two forms for each set of cylindrical masses based on the diameter-to-height ratio with values D/L = 1 for (a) normal cylinder, and D/L = 10 (b) for disk-shaped (refer to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) The angle of mismatch (δβ = β+ − β−) from the solution of Equation (54). And (b) the mismatch between the angles in states |+1⟩ and |−1⟩ (δ{α, γ} = {α, γ}+ − {α, γ}−) from the solution of Eq. (55) and (56), with the same parameters as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/f…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: These trajectories represent the two SGI arms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) The magnetic field profile that we used for each arm of the interferometer as a function of time has constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: We show the spin contrast as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Another representation of spin contrast as a function of occupation number or libration temperature at fixed mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The size of the superposition with respect to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The solution of equation (a) (49) and (b) (48), with ω0 = 0 for two pair NV-spin state cases s at {+1,-1} and {0,-1}, with +1 represent as black line -1 for red line and 0 for blue line, and superposition size δz for green line. In this case, The magnetic field profil…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (a) The solution to Eq. (54) for long cylinder case D/L = 0.1 using similar parameter from Fig. (3), (b) solutions of (55) and (56) for the long cylinder case using a similar parameter from Fig (4), and (c) the contrast comparison for three possible cylinder shapes us…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Destructive Interference of Inertial Noise in Matter-wave Interferometry

    quant-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A theory shows that cross-correlated two-dimensional vibration noise in a matter-wave interferometer can be tuned to suppress dephasing by roughly the Q-factor of the noise.

  2. A Spin-Based Pathway to Testing the Quantum Nature of Gravity

    quant-ph 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    A review and roadmap for using spin-based Stern-Gerlach superpositions of NV-center diamonds to test the quantum nature of gravity via gravitationally induced entanglement.

  3. Quantum control of Nitrogen-Vacancy spin in Diamonds: Towards matter-wave interferometry with massive objects

    quant-ph 2025-08 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper shows routine NV spin measurements and claims a feasibility simulation, but the simulation and its derivation are not included.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [66]

    Decoherence of a matter-wave interferometer due to dipole-dipole inter- actions

    Paolo Fragolino, Martine Schut, Marko Toroš, Sougato Bose, and Anupam Mazumdar. Decoherence of a matter-wave interferometer due to dipole-dipole inter- actions. Phys. Rev. A , 109(3):033301, 2024. arXiv: 2307.07001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.109.033301

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Doherty, Neil B

    Marcus W. Doherty, Neil B. Manson, Paul Delaney, Fedor Jelezko, Jörg Wrachtrup, and Lloyd C.L. Hol- lenberg. The nitrogen-vacancy colour centre in di- amond. Physics Reports , 528(1):1–45, July 2013. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2013. 02.001, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.02.001

    doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013 2013

  3. [2]

    This intu- ition will be evidenced in our numerical solution ofβ(t) and δβ(t), see Figs

    This combination provides the so- lution to the Humpty-Dumpty problem in one-dimensional one-loop interferometry for the libration mode. This intu- ition will be evidenced in our numerical solution ofβ(t) and δβ(t), see Figs. (3 and 4(a)). In Figs. (3), we show the evolution of β(t) for states | + 1⟩ and | −1⟩ for different masses ranging from 5 × 10−18 k...

  4. [3]

    The direction ˆez should align as closely as possible to the nanorotor’s initial rota- tion axis ˆn3

    Lastly, at the momentt = 0, we introduce a mag- netic field Bz. The direction ˆez should align as closely as possible to the nanorotor’s initial rota- tion axis ˆn3. However, our experimental arrange- ment can accommodate a minor initial angleβ0 between ˆn3 and ˆez. In the next subsection, we will start with the rota- tional dynamics of the cylindrical na...

  5. [4]

    Realization of a complete stern-gerlach inter- ferometer, 2018

    Yair Margalit, Zhifan Zhou, Or Dobkowski, Yonathan Japha, Daniel Rohrlich, Samuel Moukouri, and Ron Folman. Realization of a complete stern-gerlach inter- ferometer, 2018. arXiv:1801.02708

    arXiv 2018

  6. [5]

    Realization of a complete stern- gerlach interferometer: Toward a test of quantum grav- ity

    YairMargalit, OrDobkowski, ZhifanZhou, OmerAmit, Yonathan Japha, Samuel Moukouri, Daniel Rohrlich, Anupam Mazumdar, Sougato Bose, Carsten Henkel, and Ron Folman. Realization of a complete stern- gerlach interferometer: Toward a test of quantum grav- ity. Science Advances, 7(22):eabg2879, 2021. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg2879

    doi:10.1126/sciadv.abg2879 2021

  7. [6]

    T 3 stern-gerlach matter-wave interferometer

    OmerAmit, YairMargalit, OrDobkowski, ZhifanZhou, Yonathan Japha, Matthias Zimmermann, Maxim A Efremov, Frank A Narducci, Ernst M Rasel, Wolf- gang P Schleich, et al. T 3 stern-gerlach matter-wave interferometer. Physical review letters , 123(8):083601,

  8. [7]

    Inertial Torsion Noise in Matter-Wave Interferometers for Gravity Experiments.Physical Re- view D , 111(6):064004, March 2025

    Meng-Zhi Wu, Marko Toroš, Sougato Bose, and Anu- pam Mazumdar. Inertial Torsion Noise in Matter-Wave Interferometers for Gravity Experiments.Physical Re- view D , 111(6):064004, March 2025. URL: https:// arxiv.org/abs/2404.15455, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 111.064004

    arXiv 2025

Show all 98 references
  1. [8]

    Singh, and Hendrik Ulbricht

    Angelo Bassi, Kinjalk Lochan, Seema Satin, Tejin- der P. Singh, and Hendrik Ulbricht. Models of wave-function collapse, underlying theories, and ex- perimental tests. Rev. Mod. Phys. , 85:471–527, Apr 2013. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/RevModPhys.85.471, doi:10.1103/...

    2013 doi

  2. [9]

    Quantum gravitational sen- sor for space debris

    Meng-Zhi Wu, Marko Toroš, Sougato Bose, and Anupam Mazumdar. Quantum gravitational sen- sor for space debris. Phys. Rev. D , 107(10):104053,

  3. [10]

    Marshman, Anupam Mazumdar, Gavin W

    Ryan J. Marshman, Anupam Mazumdar, Gavin W. Morley, Peter F. Barker, Steven Hoekstra, and Sougato Bose. Mesoscopic Interference for Metric and Curva- ture (MIMAC) & Gravitational Wave Detection. New J. Phys., 22(8):083012, 2020. arXiv:1807.10830, doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/ab9f6c

    2020 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Entanglement Witness for the Weak Equivalence Principle.Entropy, 25(3):448, 2023

    Sougato Bose, Anupam Mazumdar, Martine Schut, and Marko Toroš. Entanglement Witness for the Weak Equivalence Principle.Entropy, 25(3):448, 2023. arXiv:2203.11628, doi:10.3390/e25030448

    2023 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Van De Kamp, Ryan J

    Marko Toroš, Thomas W. Van De Kamp, Ryan J. Marshman, M. S. Kim, Anupam Mazumdar, and Sougato Bose. Relative acceleration noise mitigation for nanocrystal matter-wave interferometry: Applica- tions to entangling masses via quantum gravity.Phys. Rev. Res., 3(2):023178, 2021. ar...

    2021 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Barker, Sougato Bose, Ryan J

    Peter F. Barker, Sougato Bose, Ryan J. Marshman, and Anupam Mazumdar. Entanglement based tomog- raphy to probe new macroscopic forces. Phys. Rev. D, 106(4):L041901, 2022. arXiv:2203.00038, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.L041901

    2022 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Quantum entan- glement of masses with nonlocal gravitational interac- tion

    Ulrich K Beckering Vinckers, Álvaro De La Cruz- 22 Dombriz, and Anupam Mazumdar. Quantum entan- glement of masses with nonlocal gravitational interac- tion. Physical Review D , 107(12):124036, 2023. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.124036

    2023 doi

  8. [15]

    Distinguishing Jordan and Einstein frames in gravity through entanglement

    Sumanta Chakraborty, Anupam Mazumdar, and Ri- tapriya Pradhan. Distinguishing Jordan and Einstein frames in gravity through entanglement. Phys. Rev. D, 108(12):L121505, 2023. arXiv:2310.06899, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.L121505

    2023 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Gravitational optomechanics: Photon- matter entanglement via graviton exchange.Phys

    Dripto Biswas, Sougato Bose, Anupam Mazumdar, and Marko Toroš. Gravitational optomechanics: Photon- matter entanglement via graviton exchange.Phys. Rev. D, 108(6):064023, 2023. arXiv:2209.09273, doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.108.064023

    2023 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Prob- ing massless and massive gravitons via entanglement in a warped extra dimension

    Shafaq Gulzar Elahi and Anupam Mazumdar. Prob- ing massless and massive gravitons via entanglement in a warped extra dimension. Physical Review D , 108(3):035018, 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108. 035018

    2023 doi

  11. [18]

    Gravitationally- induced entanglement between two massive particles is sufficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity.Phys

    Chiara Marletto and Vlatko Vedral. Gravitationally- induced entanglement between two massive particles is sufficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity.Phys. Rev. Lett., 119(24):240402, 2017. arXiv:1707.06036, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.240402

    2017 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Relativistic Dips in Entangling Power of Gravity

    Marko Toroš, Martine Schut, Patrick Andriolo, Sougato Bose, and Anupam Mazumdar. Relativistic Dips in Entangling Power of Gravity. Physical Review D, 111(3):036026, February 2025. URL: https:// arxiv.org/abs/2405.04661, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 111.036026

    2025 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Morley, Hendrik Ulbricht, Marko Toroš, Mauro Paternostro, Andrew Geraci, Peter Barker, M

    Sougato Bose, Anupam Mazumdar, Gavin W. Morley, Hendrik Ulbricht, Marko Toroš, Mauro Paternostro, Andrew Geraci, Peter Barker, M. S. Kim, and Ger- ard Milburn. Spin Entanglement Witness for Quantum Gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 119(24):240401, 2017.arXiv: 1707.06050, doi:10.1103/...

    2017 arXiv

  14. [21]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Fv-0k13s_k,

  15. [22]

    Mechanism for the quantum na- tured gravitons to entangle masses

    Sougato Bose, Anupam Mazumdar, Martine Schut, and Marko Toroš. Mechanism for the quantum na- tured gravitons to entangle masses. Phys. Rev. D , 105(10):106028, 2022. arXiv:2201.03583, doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.105.106028

    2022 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Tabletop experiments for quantum grav- ity: a user’s manual

    Daniel Carney, Philip C E Stamp, and Jacob M Taylor. Tabletop experiments for quantum grav- ity: a user’s manual. Class. Quant. Grav. , 36:034001, 2019. URL:https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 1361-6382/aaf9ca, doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aaf9ca

    2019 doi

  17. [24]

    Relativistic Effects on Entangled Single-Electron Traps

    Marko Toroš, Patrick Andriolo, Martine Schut, Sougato Bose, and Anupam Mazumdar. Relativistic Effects on Entangled Single-Electron Traps. Physical Review D, 110(5):056031, September 2024. URL: https:// arxiv.org/abs/2406.17848, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 110.056031

    2024 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Locality and entanglement in table-top testing of the quantum nature of linearized gravity.Physical Re- view A, 101(5):052110, 2020

    Ryan J Marshman, Anupam Mazumdar, and Sougato Bose. Locality and entanglement in table-top testing of the quantum nature of linearized gravity.Physical Re- view A, 101(5):052110, 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA. 101.052110

    2020 doi

  19. [26]

    Locally mediated entanglement in lin- earized quantum gravity

    Marios Christodoulou, Andrea Di Biagio, Markus Aspelmeyer, Časlav Brukner, Carlo Rovelli, and Richard Howl. Locally mediated entanglement in lin- earized quantum gravity. Physical Review Letters , 130(10):100202, 2023.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130. 100202

    2023 doi

  20. [27]

    Marshman, Sougato Bose, and Anupam Mazumdar

    Martine Schut, Jules Tilly, Ryan J. Marshman, Sougato Bose, and Anupam Mazumdar. Improving resilience of quantum-gravity-induced entanglement of masses to decoherence using three superpositions. Phys. Rev. A , 105(3):032411, 2022.arXiv:2110.14695, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevA.105.032411

    2022 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Newton, entanglement, and the gravi- ton

    Daniel Carney. Newton, entanglement, and the gravi- ton. Phys. Rev. D , 105(2):024029, 2022. arXiv:2108. 06320, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.024029

    2022 doi

  22. [29]

    Danielson, Gautam Satishchandran, and Robert M

    Daine L. Danielson, Gautam Satishchandran, and Robert M. Wald. Gravitationally mediated entangle- ment: Newtonian field versus gravitons.Phys. Rev. D , 105:086001, 2022.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.086001

    2022 doi

  23. [30]

    Entanglement of magnetically lev- itated massive schrödinger cat states by induced dipole interaction

    Ryan J Marshman, Sougato Bose, Andrew Geraci, and Anupam Mazumdar. Entanglement of magnetically lev- itated massive schrödinger cat states by induced dipole interaction. Physical Review A , 109(3):L030401, 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.109.L030401

    2024 doi

  24. [31]

    Micrometer-size spatial superpositions for the QGEM protocol via screening and trapping

    MartineSchut, AndrewGeraci, SougatoBose, andAnu- pam Mazumdar. Micrometer-size spatial superpositions for the QGEM protocol via screening and trapping. Phys. Rev. Res., 6(1):013199, 2024.arXiv:2307.15743, doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.013199

    2024 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Marshman, Anupam Mazumdar, and Sougato Bose

    Jules Tilly, Ryan J. Marshman, Anupam Mazumdar, and Sougato Bose. Qudits for witnessing quantum- gravity-induced entanglement of masses under deco- herence. Phys. Rev. A , 104(5):052416, 2021. arXiv: 2101.08086, doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.104.052416

    2021 arXiv

  26. [33]

    van de Kamp, Ryan J

    Thomas W. van de Kamp, Ryan J. Marshman, Sougato Bose, and Anupam Mazumdar. Quantum Gravity Wit- ness via Entanglement of Masses: Casimir Screening. Phys. Rev. A, 102(6):062807, 2020.arXiv:2006.06931, doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.102.062807

    2020 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Observa- tion of a gravitational aharonov-bohm effect

    Chris Overstreet, Peter Asenbaum, Joseph Curti, Minjeong Kim, and Mark A Kasevich. Observa- tion of a gravitational aharonov-bohm effect. Sci- ence, 375(6577):226–229, 2022.doi:10.1126/science. abl7152

    2022 doi

  28. [35]

    Phase shift in an atom interferometer due to spacetime curvature across its wave function

    Peter Asenbaum, Chris Overstreet, Tim Kovachy, Daniel D Brown, Jason M Hogan, and Mark A Ka- sevich. Phase shift in an atom interferometer due to spacetime curvature across its wave function. Physi- cal review letters, 118(18):183602, 2017. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.118.183602

    2017

  29. [36]

    Re- laxation of experimental parameters in a quantum- gravity-induced entanglement of masses protocol us- ing electromagnetic screening

    Martine Schut, Alexey Grinin, Andrew Dana, Sougato Bose, Andrew Geraci, and Anupam Mazumdar. Re- laxation of experimental parameters in a quantum- gravity-induced entanglement of masses protocol us- ing electromagnetic screening. Phys. Rev. Res. , 5(4):043170, 2023. arXiv:2307...

    2023 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Fein et al

    Yaakov Y. Fein et al. Quantum superposition of molecules beyond 25 kda. Nature Phys., 15(12):1242– 1245, Dec 2019. doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0663-9

    2019 doi

  31. [38]

    Unified model of matter-wave-packet evolu- tion and application to spatial coherence of atom in- terferometers

    Y Japha. Unified model of matter-wave-packet evolu- tion and application to spatial coherence of atom in- terferometers. Physical Review A, 104(5):053310, 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.104.053310. 23

    2021 doi

  32. [39]

    Nona- diabatic dynamics and geometric phase of an ultrafast rotating electron spin.Science Bulletin, 64(6):380–384,

    Xing-YanChen, TongcangLi, andZhang-QiYin. Nona- diabatic dynamics and geometric phase of an ultrafast rotating electron spin.Science Bulletin, 64(6):380–384,

  33. [40]

    Quantum rotations of nanoparticles

    Benjamin A Stickler, Klaus Hornberger, and MS Kim. Quantum rotations of nanoparticles. Nature Re- views Physics , 3(8):589–597, 2021. doi:10.1038/ s42254-021-00335-0

    2021

  34. [41]

    Quantum Un- certainty Limit for Stern-Gerlach Interferometry with Massive Objects

    Yonathan Japha and Ron Folman. Quantum Un- certainty Limit for Stern-Gerlach Interferometry with Massive Objects. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 130(11):113602,

  35. [42]

    130.113602

    arXiv:2202.10535, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 130.113602

    arXiv

  36. [43]

    Quan- tum control and berry phase of electron spins in rotating levitated diamonds in high vacuum

    Yuanbin Jin, Kunhong Shen, Peng Ju, Xingyu Gao, Chong Zu, Alejandro J Grine, and Tongcang Li. Quan- tum control and berry phase of electron spins in rotating levitated diamonds in high vacuum. Na- ture Communications, 15(1):5063, 2024. doi:10.1038/ s41467-024-49175-3

    2024

  37. [44]

    Stickler, Fer- nando Patolsky, Klaus Hornberger, Markus Arndt, and James Millen

    Stefan Kuhn, Alon Kosloff, Benjamin A. Stickler, Fer- nando Patolsky, Klaus Hornberger, Markus Arndt, and James Millen. Full rotational control of levitated sil- icon nanorods. Optica, 4(3):356, March 2017. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.4.000356, doi: 10.1364/optica.4.000356

    2017 doi

  38. [45]

    doi:10.1016/j.scib.2019.02.018

    2019 doi

  39. [46]

    Stickler et al

    Benjamin A. Stickler et al. Probing macroscopic quan- tum superpositions with nanorotors. New J. Phys. , 20:122001, 2018. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 1367-2630/aaece4, doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aaece4

    2018 doi

  40. [47]

    Rusconi, Maxime Perdriat, Gabriel Hétet, Oriol Romero-Isart, and Benjamin A

    Cosimo C. Rusconi, Maxime Perdriat, Gabriel Hétet, Oriol Romero-Isart, and Benjamin A. Stickler. Spin- Controlled Quantum Interference of Levitated Nanoro- tors. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 129(9):093605, 2022. arXiv: 2203.11717, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.093605

    2022 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Torque-free manipulation of nanoparticle rotations via embedded spins

    YueMa, MSKim, andBenjaminAStickler. Torque-free manipulation of nanoparticle rotations via embedded spins. Physical Review B , 104(13):134310, 2021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.134310

    2021 doi

  42. [49]

    B. D. Wood et al. Long spin coherence times of nitrogen vacancy centers in milled nanodiamonds. Phys. Rev. B , 105:205401, 2022. URL: https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.205401, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.105.205401

    2022 doi

  43. [50]

    C. Wan, M. Scala, S. Bose, A. C. Frangeskou, A. T. M. A. Rahman, G. W. Morley, P. F. Barker, and M. S. Kim. Tolerance in the Ramsey interference of a trapped nanodiamond. Phys. Rev. A , 93:043852,

  44. [51]

    Berthold-Georg Englert, Julian Schwinger, and Mar- lan O. Scully. Is spin coherence like humpty-dumpty? i. simplified treatment. Foundations of Physics , 18(10):1045–1056, 1988. doi:10.1007/bf01909939

    1988 doi

  45. [52]

    Schwinger, M

    J. Schwinger, M. O. Scully, and B. G. Englert. Is spin coherence like Humpty-Dumpty? Zeitschrift fur Physik D Atoms Molecules Clusters , 10(2-3):135–144, June 1988. doi:10.1007/BF01384847

    1988 doi

  46. [53]

    Scully, Berthold-Georg Englert, and Ju- lian Schwinger

    Marlan O. Scully, Berthold-Georg Englert, and Ju- lian Schwinger. Spin coherence and humpty-dumpty. iii. the effects of observation. Phys. Rev. A , 40:1775– 1784, Aug 1989. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.40.1775, doi:10.1103/PhysRevA. 40.1775

    1989 doi

  47. [54]

    B. D. Wood, S. Bose, and G. W. Morley. Spin dynamical decoupling for generating macro- scopic superpositions of a free-falling nan- odiamond. Phys. Rev. A , 105:012824, 2022. URL: https://0-link-aps-org.pugwash.lib. warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.105.012824, doi:10.1103/Ph...

    2022 doi

  48. [55]

    Marshman, Sougato Bose, and Anupam Mazumdar

    Run Zhou, Ryan J. Marshman, Sougato Bose, and Anupam Mazumdar. Catapulting towards massive and large spatial quantum superposition. Phys. Rev. Res. , 4(4):043157, 2022. arXiv:2206.04088, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.4.043157

    2022 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Marshman, Sougato Bose, and Anupam Mazumdar

    Run Zhou, Ryan J. Marshman, Sougato Bose, and Anupam Mazumdar. Mass-independent scheme for en- hancing spatial quantum superpositions.Phys. Rev. A, 107(3):032212, 2023.arXiv:2210.05689, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevA.107.032212

    2023 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Spin- Dependent Force and Inverted Harmonic Potential for Rapid Creation of Macroscopic Quantum Superposi- tions

    Run Zhou, Qian Xiang, and Anupam Mazumdar. Spin- Dependent Force and Inverted Harmonic Potential for Rapid Creation of Macroscopic Quantum Superposi- tions. Physical Review A , 111(5):052207, May 2025. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11909, doi:10. 1103/PhysRevA.111.052207

    2025 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Scala, M

    M. Scala, M. S. Kim, G. W. Morley, P. F. Barker, and S. Bose. Matter-wave interferometry of a levitated ther- malnano-oscillatorinducedandprobedbyaspin. Phys. Rev. Lett., 111:180403, 2013. URL:http://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.180403

    2013 doi

  52. [59]

    Pedernales, Gavin W

    Julen S. Pedernales, Gavin W. Morley, and Martin B. Plenio. Motional Dynamical Decoupling for Interfer- ometry with Macroscopic Particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 125(2):023602, 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125. 023602

    2020 doi

  53. [61]

    Marshman, Sougato Bose, and Anupam Mazumdar

    Run Zhou, Ryan J. Marshman, Sougato Bose, and Anupam Mazumdar. Gravito-diamagnetic forces for mass independent large spatial quantum superposi- tions. Physica Scripta , 99(5):055114, April 2024. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.08435, doi:10. 1088/1402-4896/ad37df

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Role of rotations in Stern-Gerlach interferometry with massive objects

    Yonathan Japha and Ron Folman. Role of rotations in Stern-Gerlach interferometry with massive objects. 24 arXiv, 2202(10535), February 2022. URL: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2202.10535, doi:10.48550/arXiv. 2202.10535

    2022 doi arXiv

  55. [63]

    S. J. Barnett. Magnetization by rotation.Phys. Rev., 6:239–270, Oct 1915. URL: https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRev.6.239, doi:10.1103/PhysRev. 6.239

    1915 doi

  56. [64]

    Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical review, 47(10):777, 1935

    Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical review, 47(10):777, 1935

    1935

  57. [65]

    Decoherence effects in non-classicality tests of gravity

    Simone Rijavec, Matteo Carlesso, Angelo Bassi, Vlatko Vedral, and Chiara Marletto. Decoherence effects in non-classicality tests of gravity. New J. Phys. , 23(4):043040, 2021. arXiv:2012.06230, doi:10.1088/ 1367-2630/abf3eb

    2021 arXiv

  58. [67]

    De- phasing due to electromagnetic interactions in spatial qubits

    Martine Schut, Herre Bosma, MengZhi Wu, Marko Toroš, Sougato Bose, and Anupam Mazumdar. De- phasing due to electromagnetic interactions in spatial qubits. Physical Review A , 110(2):022412, July 2024. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.05452, doi:10. 1103/PhysRevA.110.022412

    2024 arXiv

  59. [68]

    Decoherence rate expression due to air molecule scattering in spatial qubits

    Martine Schut, Patrick Andriolo, Marko Toroš, Sougato Bose, and Anupam Mazumdar. Decoherence rate expression due to air molecule scattering in spatial qubits. arXiv, 2410(20910), October 2024. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.20910, doi:10.48550/ arXiv.2410.20910

    2024 doi arXiv

  60. [69]

    The Zero-Field Splitting Term

    Patrick Bertrand. The Zero-Field Splitting Term. EPR Spectrum for Paramagnetic Cen- tres of Spin Greater than ½, page 197–239. Springer International Publishing, 2020. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39663-3_6 , doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39663-3_6

    2020 doi

  61. [70]

    Influence of a static magnetic field on the photoluminescence of an ensemble of nitrogen-vacancy color centers in a diamond single- crystal

    Ngoc Diep Lai, Dingwei Zheng, Fedor Jelezko, François Treussart, and Jean-François Roch. Influence of a static magnetic field on the photoluminescence of an ensemble of nitrogen-vacancy color centers in a diamond single- crystal. Applied Physics Letters , 95(13), September

  62. [71]

    Hoang, Jonghoon Ahn, Jaehoon Bang, and Tongcang Li

    Thai M. Hoang, Jonghoon Ahn, Jaehoon Bang, and Tongcang Li. Electron spin control of optically levi- tated nanodiamonds in vacuum. Nature Communica- tions, 7(1), July 2016. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/ncomms12250, doi:10.1038/ncomms12250

    2016 doi

  63. [72]

    Einstein–de haas nanorotor

    W Izumida, R Okuyama, K Sato, T Kato, and M Mat- suo. Einstein–de haas nanorotor. Physical Review Let- ters, 128(1):017701, 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 128.017701

    2022 doi

  64. [73]

    Gyroscopic stability for nanoparticles in Stern-Gerlach Interferometry and spin contrast

    Tian Zhou, Sougato Bose, and Anupam Mazumdar. Gyroscopic stability for nanoparticles in Stern-Gerlach Interferometry and spin contrast. arXiv, 2407(15813), July 2024. URL:https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.15813, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2407.15813

    2024 doi arXiv

  65. [74]

    O. Amit, Y. Margalit, O. Dobkowski, Z. Zhou, Y. Japha, M. Zimmermann, M. A. Efremov, F. A. Nar- ducci, E. M. Rasel, W. P. Schleich, and R. Folman. t3 stern-gerlach matter-wave interferometer. Physical Review Letters, 123(8), August 2019. URL: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev...

    2019 doi

  66. [75]

    Marshman, Anupam Mazumdar, Ron Folman, and Sougato Bose

    Ryan J. Marshman, Anupam Mazumdar, Ron Folman, and Sougato Bose. Constructing nano-object quantum superpositions with a stern-gerlach interferometer. Phys. Rev. Res. , 4:023087, May 2022. URL: https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.023087, doi:10.1103/PhysRevResea...

    2022 doi

  67. [76]

    Nanoscale quantum sensing with nitrogen-vacancy centers in nanodiamonds – a magnetic resonance perspective

    Takuya Fabian Segawa and Ryuji Igarashi. Nanoscale quantum sensing with nitrogen-vacancy centers in nanodiamonds – a magnetic resonance perspective. Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , 134-135, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2022.12.001

    2022 doi

  68. [77]

    Trusheim, Lu Li, Abdelghani Laraoui, Edward H

    Matthew E. Trusheim, Lu Li, Abdelghani Laraoui, Edward H. Chen, Hassaram Bakhru, Tim Schröder, Ophir Gaathon, Carlos A. Meriles, and Dirk Englund. Scalable fabrication of high purity diamond nanocrys- tals with long-spin-coherence nitrogen vacancy centers. Nano Letters , 13(6)...

    2013

  69. [78]

    High-precision nanoscale temperature sens- ing using single defects in diamond

    PhilippNeumann, IngmarJakobi, FlorianDolde, Chris- tianBurk, RolfReuter, GeraldWaldherr, JoachimHon- ert, Tobias Wolf, Andreas Brunner, Jeong Hyun Shim, Dieter Suter, Hitoshi Sumiya, Junichi Isoya, and Jörg Wrachtrup. High-precision nanoscale temperature sens- ing using single...

    2013 doi

  70. [79]

    Magnetization by rotation

    Samuel Jackson Barnett. Magnetization by rotation. Physical review, 6(4):239, 1915.doi:doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRev.6.239

    1915

  71. [80]

    Unified theory of nuclear re- actions

    Herman Feshbach. Unified theory of nuclear re- actions. Annals of Physics , 5(4):357–390, De- cember 1958. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ 0003-4916(58)90007-1, doi:10.1016/0003-4916(58) 90007-1

    1958 doi

  72. [81]

    A unified theory of nuclear reactions

    Herman Feshbach. A unified theory of nuclear reactions. ii. Annals of Physics , 19(2):287–313, August 1962. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ 0003-4916(62)90221-X, doi:10.1016/0003-4916(62) 90221-x

    1962 doi

  73. [82]

    Tuning the adiabaticity of spin dynamics in diamond nitrogen vacancy centers.Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter , 34(25):255503, April

    Y B Band and Y Japha. Tuning the adiabaticity of spin dynamics in diamond nitrogen vacancy centers.Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter , 34(25):255503, April

  74. [83]

    Wood, Emmanuel Lilette, Yaakov Y

    Alexander A. Wood, Emmanuel Lilette, Yaakov Y. Fein, Nikolas Tomek, Liam P. McGuinness, Lloyd C. L. Hollenberg, Robert E. Scholten, and Andy M. Mar- tin. Quantum measurement of a rapidly rotating spin qubit in diamond. Science Advances, 4:eaar7691,

  75. [84]

    Diamagnetic micro-chip traps for levitated nanoparticle entanglement experiments

    Shafaq Gulzar Elahi, Martine Schut, Andrew Dana, Alexey Grinin, Sougato Bose, Anupam Mazumdar, and Andrew Geraci. Diamagnetic micro-chip traps for levitated nanoparticle entanglement experiments. arXiv, 2411(02325), November 2024. URL: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2411.02325, doi:10...

    2024 doi

  76. [85]

    Phonon Induced Contrast in Matter Wave Interferometer

    Qian Xiang, Run Zhou, Sougato Bose, and Anupam Mazumdar. Phonon Induced Contrast in Matter Wave Interferometer. Physical Review A , 110(4):042614, October 2024. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404. 04210, doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.110.042614

    2024 doi

  77. [86]

    Cooling of a levitated nanoparti- cle to the motional quantum ground state

    Uroš Delić, Manuel Reisenbauer, Kahan Dare, David Grass, Vladan Vuletić, Nikolai Kiesel, and Markus Aspelmeyer. Cooling of a levitated nanoparti- cle to the motional quantum ground state. Sci- ence, 367(6480):892–895, February 2020. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aba39...

    2020 doi

  78. [87]

    Simultaneous ground-state cooling of two mechan- ical modes of a levitated nanoparticle

    Johannes Piotrowski, Dominik Windey, Jayadev Vi- jayan, Carlos Gonzalez-Ballestero, Andrés de los Ríos Sommer, Nadine Meyer, Romain Quidant, Oriol Romero-Isart, René Reimann, and Lukas Novotny. Simultaneous ground-state cooling of two mechan- ical modes of a levitated nanopart...

    2023

  79. [88]

    Marit O. E. Steiner, Julen S. Pedernales, and Martin B. Plenio. Pentacene-Doped Naphthalene for Levitated Optomechanics. arXiv, 2405(13869), May 2024. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.13869, doi:10.48550/ arXiv.2405.13869

    2024 doi arXiv

  80. [89]

    Experimental proof of the existence of ampére’s molecular currents

    A Einstein and WJ De Haas. Experimental proof of the existence of ampére’s molecular currents. InProc. KNA W, volume 181, page 696, 1915

    1915

  81. [90]

    Bradley et al

    C.E. Bradley et al. A ten-qubit solid-state spin register with quantum memory up to one minute.Phys. Rev. X, 9:031045, 2019. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevX.9.031045, doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.9. 031045

    2019 doi

  82. [91]

    Wood, Emmanuel Lilette, Yaakov Y

    Alexander A. Wood, Emmanuel Lilette, Yaakov Y. Fein, V. S. Perunicic, Lloyd C. L. Hollenberg, Robert E. Scholten, and Andy M. Martin. Magnetic pseudo-fields in a rotating electron–nuclear spin system. Nature Physics, 13:1070, 2017. URL: https://www.nature. com/articles/nphys42...

    2017 doi

  83. [94]

    Barut, M

    A.O. Barut, M. Božić, and Z. Marić. The mag- netic top as a model of quantum spin. Annals of Physics, 214(1):53–83, February 1992. URL: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(92)90061-P, doi: 10.1016/0003-4916(92)90061-p. 25

    1992 doi

  84. [99]

    Stickler

    Jonas Schäfer, Henning Rudolph, Klaus Hornberger, and Benjamin A. Stickler. Cooling nanorotors by elliptic coherent scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 126:163603, Apr 2021. URL: https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.163603, doi:10. 1103/PhysRevLett.126.163603

    2021 doi

  85. [100]

    Stickler

    Vanessa Wachter, Silvia Viola Kusminskiy, Gabriel Hétet, and Benjamin A. Stickler. Gyroscopically sta- bilized quantum spin rotors. arXiv, 2504(10339), April 2025. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504. 10339, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2504.10339. Appendix A: Feschbach Formalism Recall the...

    2025 doi

  86. [2009]

    URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3238467, doi:10.1063/1.3238467

    doi

  87. [2016]

    warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.043852

    URL: http://0-link.aps.org.pugwash.lib. warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.043852

    doi

  88. [2018]

    URL: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/ sciadv.aar7691, doi:10.1126/sciadv.aar7691

    doi

  89. [2022]

    URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ ac60d1, doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ac60d1

    doi

  90. [2023]

    107.104053

    arXiv:2211.15695, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 107.104053

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.