Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 5 cited by

This paper claims that the one-loop quantum correction to the O(16)×O(16) heterotic string on AdS3×S3×T4 always leaves the cosmological constant negative, so the vacuum never lifts to de Sitter for any flux values.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 08:21 UTC pith:TAVGMNQO

load-bearing objection A careful, explicit one-loop analysis of O(16)xO(16) on AdS3xS3xT4: no dS uplift in the controlled regime, but the abstract overreaches by claiming 'any values of the fluxes.' the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2510.20915 v3 pith:TAVGMNQO submitted 2025-10-23 hep-th

O(16)timesO(16) heterotic theory on AdS₃times S³times T⁴

Daniel Robbins , Hassaan Saleem This is my paper
classification hep-th PACS 11.25.-w
keywords heterotic stringO(16)×O(16)AdS3×S3×T4 compactificationnon-supersymmetric vacuaone-loop effective potentialcosmological constantBreitenlohner-Freedman boundflux stabilization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper asks whether the one-loop quantum correction, which adds positive energy to the effective potential, can lift a non-supersymmetric string vacuum from anti-de Sitter (negative cosmological constant) to de Sitter (positive), a step toward a stringy model of accelerated expansion. The authors study O(16)×O(16) heterotic theory on AdS3×S3×T4, a family of vacua parameterized by two flux integers, and derive the exact one-loop-corrected vacuum. They find the cosmological constant stays negative for every value of the fluxes, so no uplift to de Sitter occurs, and the dilaton/string coupling is stabilized to a finite value even in the n1→0 limit. Fluctuation analysis shows the six-dimensional scalar and tensor modes all sit above the Breitenlohner-Freedman bound, while torus moduli remain above the bound for a large range of fluxes.

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that adding the one-loop potential, V1-loop = 2λ V⁻³ e^{3χ} g_s²/α' with λ ≈ 1.565 for the square self-dual torus, shifts the tree-level AdS3×S3×T4 vacuum but never enough to reach de Sitter. Solving the exact extremum conditions yields a quartic equation for the sphere radius; the physical branch has L_o² and g_o² well-behaved for all integer fluxes, and the cosmological constant approaches the strictly negative value Λ3,o → -(1/2)√(3/2)/(|n5|α') as n1→0. Around these vacua, the scalar and tensor fluctuations from the six-dimensional effective theory all lie above the Breitenlohner-Freedman bound m² ≥ -L_{AdS,o}⁻²; one ℓ=2 eigenvalue is negativ

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the one-loop scalar potential generated by the genus-one partition function of the non-supersymmetric O(16)×O(16) heterotic string on T4, expressed as V1-loop = 2λ V⁻³ e^{3χ} g_s²/α', with the dimensionless constant λ fixed by a lattice-sum calculation (λ ≈ 1.565 at the square self-dual torus). Added to the tree-level potential built from curvature, magnetic H3 flux n5 and electric H3 flux n1, it turns the vacuum equations into an exactly solvable quartic for L_o² and g_o². The stability analysis then uses the same background to compute the masses of metric, dilaton and B-field perturbations expanded in S3 spherical harmonics, comparing every mass squared to the

Load-bearing premise

The one-loop potential is computed by treating AdS3×S3 as flat R^{1,5}×T4, justified only when both the AdS and S3 radii are much larger than the string scale, yet the no-uplift and stability conclusions are extrapolated to all fluxes, including the n1→0 corner where the curvature approaches the string scale.

What would settle it

Compute the one-loop vacuum amplitude with the worldsheet on the actual AdS3×S3 background, or include the leading α'-corrections to the flat-space potential used in (3.6), and re-solve the extremum equations (3.8)-(3.10). If for any allowed integer fluxes the resulting cosmological constant becomes non-negative, or if any mass eigenvalue drops below -L_{AdS,o}⁻², the paper's central conclusion is wrong.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • No de Sitter uplift: the one-loop potential is always too weak to make Λ3 positive, so this compactification cannot be a starting point for a stringy dS vacuum.
  • A finite string coupling exists even at n1=0, where the tree-level coupling would diverge, producing intrinsically quantum vacua for each n5.
  • The six-dimensional perturbative spectrum is stable at one-loop order: all scalar and tensor modes satisfy the BF bound for every integer flux choice.
  • Torus moduli stay above the BF bound as long as s = λn5²/|n1| is small, but the paper's preliminary analysis indicates an instability threshold as n1→0.
  • The first-order correction to the cosmological constant is -s/4, suggesting the failure of one-loop uplift may be a systematic feature rather than an accident of this background.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the one-loop potential were computed on the curved AdS3×S3 background instead of flat R^{1,5}×T4, the no-uplift conclusion could change precisely in the n1→0 corner where the curvature reaches the string scale.
  • The pattern of a universally negative first-order correction and a marginal BF-bound mode that gets pushed upward suggests that similar non-supersymmetric AdS3 constructions may share the same qualitative fate.
  • A natural testable extension is to redo the mass-matrix analysis at other Narain critical points beyond the square torus and check whether any of them keeps all torus moduli above the BF bound all the way to n1=0.
  • A world-sheet WZW treatment of the AdS3 and S3 factors would provide an independent, approximation-free check of both the no-uplift result and the spectrum.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies non-supersymmetric O(16)×O(16) heterotic string theory compactified on AdS_3 × S^3 × T^4, with flux integers (n1, n5). It derives the tree-level potential and its extremum, then adds a one-loop scalar potential computed from the genus-one partition function on R^{1,5}×T^4, parameterized by a single dimensionless number λ. Solving the one-loop corrected extremum equations exactly, it claims that the three-dimensional cosmological constant remains negative for all values of the fluxes, i.e. no uplift to de Sitter. It then performs a stability analysis of fluctuations around the vacuum in the six-dimensional effective theory, finding that all six-dimensional scalar and tensor modes lie above the Breitenlohner-Freedman bound, and argues that T^4 moduli are also above the bound at least for a large range of fluxes. Appendix D shows that the square torus at self-dual radius is an extremum of the moduli potential.

Significance. If the no-uplift result is correct, this is a meaningful data point for the non-supersymmetric string landscape: it extends the earlier AdS_3×S^3×S^3×S^1 analysis of [36] to the T^4 compactification and does so with a remarkably explicit and checkable derivation. The paper has several concrete strengths: the tree-level chain from action to potential and extremum is explicit; the one-loop coefficient λ is defined by a partition-function integral and evaluated numerically for the square torus, with no fitted parameters in the central claim; the extremum equations are reduced to an exact quartic solution; and the BF-bound analysis for the six-dimensional modes is worked out in detail, with expansions and numerical plots. However, the advertised universality of the no-dS statement is limited by the flat-space approximation used to compute the one-loop potential, and the T^4-moduli stability claim is conditional on Hessian data that are not computed in this paper. These gaps do not invalidate the core derivation, but they do require a revision of the claims as stated.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.1–3.2, Eqs. (3.6), (3.19), (3.20)] The central no-uplift conclusion is extrapolated outside the regime of validity of the flat-space one-loop potential. §3.1 explicitly assumes that the AdS_3 length scale and the S^3 radius are much larger than the self-dual radius, so that the background can be approximated as R^{1,5}×T^4. The exact solution is then taken to the n1→0 limit, where Eq. (3.19) gives L_o^2 = (√(2/3)) α' |n5|. For |n5|=O(1) this is O(α'), so both the AdS_3 and S^3 curvatures are string-scale and the flat-space approximation is no longer justified. The authors' own scaling estimates in §3.3 require |n5|≫1 for neglected α'(Riemann)^2 and g_s^4 terms to be suppressed, yet the abstract and Eq. (3.20) claim no de Sitter uplift 'for any values of the fluxes.' A curvature-corrected genus-one potential on AdS_3×S^3 could in principle shift the extremum enough to change the sign of Λ_{3,o} in this corner. The stronges
  2. [§4.2, Eqs. (4.16)–(4.19), Appendix D] The advertised statement that T^4 moduli are above the BF bound 'at least for a large range of fluxes' is not supported by a concrete computation. Appendix D shows only that the square torus at self-dual radius is an extremum of the moduli potential; it does not compute the Hessian eigenvalues µ_α. Equation (4.16) leaves m_α^2 = (g_o^2/α'v) µ_α with µ_α undetermined, and the stability inequalities (4.18)–(4.19) are conditions on those unknown numbers. The analysis also assumes the critical point is not a knife edge, with no evidence supplied. The text itself states that preliminary investigation suggests the intrinsically quantum limit may violate the inequality for some µ_α. Thus the abstract's 'large range' claim remains conditional on uncomputed Hessian data; either the Hessian should be evaluated for at least one explicit critical point, or the claim should be explicitly flagged as a
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (4.11)] As printed, the two equations in (4.11) are self-contradictory: 0 = -Λ/2 + 2/L_AdS^2 - 2/L_AdS^2 and 0 = -Λ/2 - 2/L_o^2 + 2/L_o^2 would both imply Λ=0. Please replace them with the correct Einstein-equation conditions that lead to the relations used in (4.12) and in the footnote.
  2. [Eq. (4.12)] The displayed relations in (4.12) contain mutually inconsistent formulas for L_AdS,o^{-2}; the first and third lines appear to give different expressions. Please correct the typography and ensure each relation is stated once.
  3. [Eq. (3.6) and Appendix C] Equation (3.6) and the displayed expressions in Appendix C contain extensive extraneous or corrupted symbol sequences that make the equations difficult to read. These should be cleaned up so that the definitions of λ and the lattice sums are unambiguous.
  4. [§4.6, §5] The name 'Breitenlohner-Freedman' is misspelled in several places ('Brightenlohner-Friedmann', 'Breitnlohner-Freedman'). Please standardize the spelling.
  5. [§1, §4.2] The introduction promises that in the strict n1→0 limit 'we run into trouble' with T^4 moduli dropping below the BF bound, while §4.2 only reports a preliminary indication of such a violation. Please align the wording with the actual status of the calculation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the one-loop input lambda is computed from the partition function, not fitted; the self-citation to [36] is a cross-check rather than a load-bearing input.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The tree-level potential (2.11) is obtained by compactifying the 10d action on S3 x T4 with quantized H3 fluxes, and the extremum gives L^2 = n5^2 alpha'^2, g_s^2 = v |n5| / ((2 pi)^4 |n1|), Lambda_3 = -1/(alpha' |n5|), eqs. (2.15)-(2.18). The one-loop input lambda is not fitted: it is defined by the genus-one integral (3.7) and evaluated in Appendix C from the O(16)xO(16) partition function on a square torus, giving lambda ~ 1.565. The extremum equations (3.8)-(3.10) are then solved exactly, and the no-uplift result (3.20) follows from the explicit large-s expansion without adjusting any parameter to produce it. The methodological overlap with [36], which shares an author, is used only as a comparison and cross-check: the first-order coefficient -1/4 is derived independently, and the statement that the qualitative behavior is the same as in [36] is a comment, not an input. The flat-space approximation is explicitly flagged in Sec. 3.1 ('We will assume that the fluxes are such that the AdS length scale and the radius of S3 are much bigger than the self-dual radius, which enables us to approximate the AdS3 x S3 x T4 background by a R^{1,5} x T4 background'), and Sec. 3.3 explicitly discusses neglected alpha'(Riemann)^2 and genus-two corrections. These are scope limitations for the strongest 'any values of the fluxes' phrasing, but they are not circularity: no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no central claim reduces by definition to its own input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The load-bearing inputs are: (i) the flat-space one-loop approximation of Section 3.1, the main structural assumption; (ii) the standard worldsheet partition function (C.1); (iii) the assumed six-dimensional effective action with one-loop mass terms (4.1); (iv) the square-torus self-dual critical point, whose extremum status is proven but whose Hessian is deferred; and (v) the large-|n5| suppression of higher corrections (Section 3.3). There are no invented entities and no fitted constants: λ and all spectra are computed from stated integrals and equations. The two listed free parameters are the moduli-space point chosen (v) and the uncomputed Hessian eigenvalues (μ_α) on which the torus-moduli stability claim depends.

free parameters (2)
  • Torus volume v = v = (2π)^4 (square torus at self-dual radius)
    The extremum and stability analysis is performed at the self-dual square-torus point. Appendix D proves the first derivatives vanish there, but the stability of the v-direction (part of the 80 torus moduli) is not computed, and the v-dependence is restored only by a rescaling argument in Section 3.1.
  • Narain-moduli Hessian eigenvalues μ_α = not computed; assumed flux-independent, order-one dimensionless numbers
    The torus-moduli BF-bound claim (eqs. 4.16-4.19) depends on these eigenvalues, which the paper defers to future work. The 'large range of fluxes' in the abstract is only as large as μ_α allows; Section 4.2 states the n1→0 limit likely violates the bound for some eigenvalue.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption One-loop potential equals the flat-space R^(1,5)×T4 result of eq. (3.6), with λ the flat-space integral (3.7)
    Stated in Section 3.1: 'We will assume that the fluxes are such that the AdS length scale and the radius of S3 are much bigger than the self-dual radius, which enables us to approximate the AdS3×S3×T4 background by a R^(1,5)×T4 background.' Used for all fluxes, including the string-scale n1→0 corner (eq. 3.19).
  • domain assumption Worldsheet partition function of O(16)×O(16) on T4 (eq. C.1) with Γ_{20,4}± lattices and shift vector δ
    Standard one-loop string input; both λ ≃ 1.565 and the extremum property of the square torus follow from it.
  • standard math Tree-level ten-dimensional action (2.1) and H3 flux quantization (2.7)-(2.8)
    Standard heterotic effective action; adopted from [36] with conventions stated.
  • domain assumption Six-dimensional effective action (4.1) with a one-loop cosmological constant and σ-mass terms
    The mass matrix μ_{αβ} is posited with g_s² scaling and diagonal form; its actual eigenvalues are the deferred μ_α.
  • ad hoc to paper Square torus at self-dual radius is a non-knife-edge extremum of the moduli potential
    First derivatives are proven to vanish (Appendix D); the Hessian is not computed, and the stability claims in Section 4.2 explicitly assume the critical point is not a knife edge.
  • domain assumption Higher-loop and higher-derivative corrections are suppressed by powers of 1/|n5| (Section 3.3)
    Scaling estimates (3.21)-(3.24) justify dropping two-loop and α'² terms when |n5| is large. The arguments extend to the large-s regime but are estimates, not bounds.
  • standard math AdS3 Breitenlohner-Freedman bound m² ≥ -1/L²_AdS
    Standard stability criterion for scalar and tensor fields in three-dimensional AdS, applied throughout Section 4.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 35706 in / 23600 out tokens · 198256 ms · 2026-08-04T08:21:41.368401+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we study non-supersymmetric $AdS_{3}\times S^{3}$ vacuua of $O(16)\times O(16)$ heterotic theory on a string scale $T^{4}$ background, which are parameterized by a pair of flux integers. Adding the one-loop scalar potential to the effective theory contributes positively to the cosmological constant, but we find that there is no uplift to de Sitter for any values of the fluxes. We study the fluctuations around these vacua and show that all scalar and tensor modes from the six-dimensional effective theory lie above the Breitenlohner-Freedman bound. The moduli coming from the torus compactification will also be above the bound, at least for a large range of fluxes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.20915 by Daniel Robbins, Hassaan Saleem.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Plots of Lo, go and Vmin against log n1 for different values of n5 given in the legend. Note that if we look at the ratios of one-loop to tree-level quantities, ˜g = go/gs and L˜ = Lo/L, then these only depend on the parameters λ, n1, and n5 through the combination s ∶= λn2 5 /∣n1∣. The limit s → 0, corresponding to sending λ → 0 and hence turning off the one-loop potential (but which can also be viewed as… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The four eigenvalues for the ℓ = 2 mass matrix plotted against log n5 for n1 = 10. On the left of the diagram (corresponding to small values of n 2 5 /n1) the eigenvalues approach their tree-level, or supersymmetric, values for which L 2 AdS,om2 are ℓ(ℓ − 2) = 0 and (ℓ + 2)(ℓ + 4) = 24 in this case. To the right (large values of n 2 5 /n1) the eigenvalues split and asymptote to another set of values (see s… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The three eigenvalues for the ℓ = 1 mass matrix plotted against log n5 for n1 = 10. At small n5 we get the tree-level values, which are two eigenvalues at L 2 AdS,om2 = (ℓ + 2)(ℓ + 4) = 15, and one more at ℓ(ℓ − 2) = −1, which is the BF bound. For large n5 we asymptote to different values. All eigenvalues are above the BF bound for all values of the fluxes. transformations parameterized by ξ (1,0) . We can… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The two eigenvalues for the ℓ = 0 mass matrix plotted against log n5 for n1 = 10. The tree-level value L 2 AdS,om2 = 8 is reached at small n5 (equivalently large n1), while for larger values of the ratio n 2 5 /n1 the eigenvalues split, but remain positive through the whole range of flux values. but the residual α gauge transformation can then be precisely used to set u = 0. For the remaining dilaton, gµν … view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Non-supersymmetric heterotic strings on $AdS_{4}\times S^{3}\times S^{3}$

    hep-th 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    Non-supersymmetric heterotic AdS4 × S³ × S³ solutions exhibit a coupled instability: comparable fluxes trigger perturbative tachyons, while brane nucleation drives unequal fluxes toward that tachyonic regime.

  2. Non-supersymmetric strings on AdS$_3$: a world-sheet perspective

    hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0

    On AdS3×S3×S3×S1, a Wilson-line deformation of the Spin(16)×Spin(16)⋊Z2 heterotic string produces a level-matched tachyon, so the classical moduli space contains unstable regions.

  3. Heterotic Strings on Enriques Surfaces

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Classification of shift vectors in heterotic orbifold compactifications on Enriques surfaces with spectrum analysis and tachyon projection for non-supersymmetric interpretations.

  4. Heterotic Strings on Enriques Surfaces

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Classifies shift vectors for heterotic orbifolds on Enriques surfaces, analyzes spectra, and interprets some models as non-supersymmetric 10D heterotic compactifications with tachyon projection.

  5. Non-supersymmetric heterotic strings on $AdS_{4}\times S^{3}\times S^{3}$

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Non-supersymmetric heterotic string compactifications on AdS4 x S3 x S3 with two fluxes develop tachyonic instabilities when fluxes are close in magnitude and show inverse scale separation when far apart, but brane nu...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanim et al. “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters”. In:Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020). [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], A6.doi:10 . 1051 / 0004 - 6361 / 201833910. arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    (A)dS backgrounds from asymmetric orientifolds

    Eva Silverstein. “(A)dS backgrounds from asymmetric orientifolds”. In:Clay Mat. Proc.1 (2002), p. 179. arXiv:hep-th/0106209

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  3. [3]

    De Sitter space in noncritical string theory

    Alexander Maloney, Eva Silverstein, and Andrew Strominger. “De Sitter space in noncritical string theory”. In:Workshop on Conference on the Future of Theoretical Physics and Cosmology in Honor of Steven Hawking’s 60th Birthday. May 2002, pp. 570–591. arXiv:hep-th/0205316

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  4. [4]

    De Sitter vacua in string theory

    Shamit Kachru et al. “De Sitter vacua in string theory”. In:Phys. Rev. D68 (2003), p. 046005.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.046005. arXiv:hep-th/0301240

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  5. [5]

    Searching for slow-roll moduli inflation in massive type IIA supergravity with metric fluxes

    Raphael Flauger et al. “Searching for slow-roll moduli inflation in massive type IIA supergravity with metric fluxes”. In:Phys. Rev. D79 (2009), p. 086011.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.086011. arXiv: 0812.3886 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    A sufficient condition for de Sitter vacua in type IIB string theory

    Markus Rummel and Alexander Westphal. “A sufficient condition for de Sitter vacua in type IIB string theory”. In:JHEP01 (2012), p. 020.doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2012)020. arXiv:1107.2115 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  7. [7]

    A new class of de Sitter vacua in String Theory Compactifications

    Ana Ach´ ucarro, Pablo Ortiz, and Kepa Sousa. “A new class of de Sitter vacua in String Theory Compactifications”. In:Phys. Rev. D94 (2016), p. 086012.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevD . 94 . 086012. arXiv:1510.01273 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    A New Class of de Sitter Vacua in Type IIB Large Volume Compactifications

    Diego Gallego et al. “A New Class of de Sitter Vacua in Type IIB Large Volume Compactifications”. In:JHEP10 (2017), p. 193.doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)193. arXiv:1707.01095 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    de Sitter vacua from ten dimensions

    Shamit Kachru et al. “de Sitter vacua from ten dimensions”. In:JHEP12 (2021), p. 111.doi:10. 1007/JHEP12(2021)111. arXiv:1908.04788 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    Crisis on Infinite Earths: Short-lived de Sitter Vacua in the String The- ory Landscape

    Heliudson Bernardo et al. “Crisis on Infinite Earths: Short-lived de Sitter Vacua in the String The- ory Landscape”. In:JHEP04 (2021), p. 037.doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2021)037. arXiv:2009.04504 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Small cosmological constants in string theory

    Mehmet Demirtas et al. “Small cosmological constants in string theory”. In:JHEP12 (2021), p. 136. doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2021)136. arXiv:2107.09064 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    On stable type IIA de-Sitter vacua with geometric flux

    Pramod Shukla. “On stable type IIA de-Sitter vacua with geometric flux”. In:Eur. Phys. J. C83.3 (2023), p. 196.doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11361-w. arXiv:2202.12840 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Candidate de Sitter vacua

    Liam McAllister et al. “Candidate de Sitter vacua”. In:Phys. Rev. D111.8 (2025), p. 086015.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.086015. arXiv:2406.13751 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Obstacles to Constructing de Sitter Space in String Theory

    Michael Dine et al. “Obstacles to Constructing de Sitter Space in String Theory”. In:JHEP02 (2021), p. 050.doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2021)050. arXiv:2008.12399 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    Trustworthy de Sitter compactifications of string theory: a comprehensive review

    Iosif Bena, Mariana Gra˜ na, and Thomas Van Riet. “Trustworthy de Sitter compactifications of string theory: a comprehensive review”. In: (Mar. 2023). arXiv:2303.17680 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    What if string theory has no de Sitter vacua?

    Ulf H. Danielsson and Thomas Van Riet. “What if string theory has no de Sitter vacua?” In:Int. J. Mod. Phys. D27.12 (2018), p. 1830007.doi:10.1142/S0218271818300070. arXiv:1804.01120 [hep-th]. 24

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    De Sitter Space and the Swampland

    Georges Obied et al. “De Sitter Space and the Swampland”. In: (June 2018). arXiv:1806 . 08362 [hep-th]

    2018

  18. [18]

    Distance and de Sitter Conjectures on the Swampland

    Hirosi Ooguri et al. “Distance and de Sitter Conjectures on the Swampland”. In:Phys. Lett. B788 (2019), pp. 180–184.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.11.018. arXiv:1810.05506 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    Supergravity description of field theories on curved man- ifolds and a no go theorem

    Juan Martin Maldacena and Carlos Nunez. “Supergravity description of field theories on curved man- ifolds and a no go theorem”. In:Int. J. Mod. Phys. A16 (2001). Ed. by Michael J. Duff, J. T. Liu, and J. Lu, pp. 822–855.doi:10.1142/S0217751X01003937. arXiv:hep-th/0007018

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  20. [20]

    Constraining de Sitter Space in String Theory

    David Kutasov et al. “Constraining de Sitter Space in String Theory”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.115.7 (2015), p. 071305.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.071305. arXiv:1504.00056 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  21. [21]

    Holography and the KKLT scenario

    Severin L¨ ust et al. “Holography and the KKLT scenario”. In:JHEP10 (2022), p. 188.doi:10.1007/ JHEP10(2022)188. arXiv:2204.07171 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Supersymmetry Breaking by Fluxes

    Savdeep Sethi. “Supersymmetry Breaking by Fluxes”. In:JHEP10 (2018), p. 022.doi:10.1007/ JHEP10(2018)022. arXiv:1709.03554 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  23. [23]

    Non-supersymmetric AdS and the Swampland

    Hirosi Ooguri and Cumrun Vafa. “Non-supersymmetric AdS and the Swampland”. In:Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.21 (2017), pp. 1787–1801.doi:10.4310/ATMP.2017.v21.n7.a8. arXiv:1610.01533 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  24. [24]

    Vacua Morghulis

    Ben Freivogel and Matthew Kleban. “Vacua Morghulis”. In: (Oct. 2016). arXiv:1610.04564 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    Stable Nonsupersymmetric Anti–de Sitter Vacua of Massive IIA Supergravity

    Adolfo Guarino, Emanuel Malek, and Henning Samtleben. “Stable Nonsupersymmetric Anti–de Sitter Vacua of Massive IIA Supergravity”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.126.6 (2021), p. 061601.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett.126.061601. arXiv:2011.06600 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Holographic evidence for nonsupersymmetric conformal manifolds

    Alfredo Giambrone et al. “Holographic evidence for nonsupersymmetric conformal manifolds”. In:Phys. Rev. D105.6 (2022), p. 066018.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.066018. arXiv:2112.11966 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Triality and the consistent reductions on AdS 3 ×S 3

    Camille Eloy, Gabriel Larios, and Henning Samtleben. “Triality and the consistent reductions on AdS 3 ×S 3”. In:JHEP01 (2022), p. 055.doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)055. arXiv:2111.01167 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    String Theories in Ten-Dimensions Without Space-Time Su- persymmetry

    Lance J. Dixon and Jeffrey A. Harvey. “String Theories in Ten-Dimensions Without Space-Time Su- persymmetry”. In:Nucl. Phys. B274 (1986). Ed. by B. Schellekens, pp. 93–105.doi:10.1016/0550- 3213(86)90619-X

    doi:10.1016/0550- 1986

  29. [29]

    Toroidal Compactification of Nonsupersymmetric Heterotic Strings

    Paul H. Ginsparg and C. Vafa. “Toroidal Compactification of Nonsupersymmetric Heterotic Strings”. In:Nucl. Phys. B289 (1987), p. 414.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90387-7

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90387-7 1987

  30. [30]

    An O(16) x O(16) Heterotic String

    Luis Alvarez-Gaume et al. “An O(16) x O(16) Heterotic String”. In:Phys. Lett. B171 (1986), pp. 155– 162.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91524-8

    doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91524-8 1986

  31. [31]

    Anomaly cancellations in type I D-9 - anti-D-9 system and the USp(32) string theory

    Shigeki Sugimoto. “Anomaly cancellations in type I D-9 - anti-D-9 system and the USp(32) string theory”. In:Prog. Theor. Phys.102 (1999), pp. 685–699.doi:10.1143/PTP.102.685. arXiv:hep- th/9905159

    arXiv 1999

  32. [32]

    Some properties of open string theories

    Augusto Sagnotti. “Some properties of open string theories”. In:International Workshop on Super- symmetry and Unification of Fundamental Interactions (SUSY 95). Sept. 1995, pp. 473–484. arXiv: hep-th/9509080

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  33. [33]

    Surprises in open string perturbation theory

    Augusto Sagnotti. “Surprises in open string perturbation theory”. In:Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.56 (1997). Ed. by D. Lust, H. J. Otto, and G. Weigt, pp. 332–343.doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(97)00344-7. arXiv:hep-th/9702093

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  34. [34]

    On String Vacua without Supersymmetry: brane dynamics, bubbles and holography

    Ivano Basile. “On String Vacua without Supersymmetry: brane dynamics, bubbles and holography”. PhD thesis. Pisa, Scuola Normale Superiore, 2020. arXiv:2010.00628 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Supersymmetry breaking and stability in string vacua: Brane dynamics, bubbles and the swampland

    Ivano Basile. “Supersymmetry breaking and stability in string vacua: Brane dynamics, bubbles and the swampland”. In:Riv. Nuovo Cim.44.10 (2021), pp. 499–596.doi:10.1007/s40766-021-00024-9. arXiv:2107.02814 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    Non-supersymmetric AdS from string the- ory

    Zihni Kaan Baykara, Daniel Robbins, and Savdeep Sethi. “Non-supersymmetric AdS from string the- ory”. In:SciPost Phys.15.6 (2023), p. 224.doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.224. arXiv:2212.02557 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    BPS spectrum on AdS 3×S3×S3×S1

    Lorenz Eberhardt et al. “BPS spectrum on AdS 3×S3×S3×S1”. In:JHEP03 (2017), p. 124.doi:10. 1007/JHEP03(2017)124. arXiv:1701.03552 [hep-th]. 25

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [38]

    Non-supersymmetric heterotic strings on a circle

    Bernardo Fraiman et al. “Non-supersymmetric heterotic strings on a circle”. In:JHEP12 (2024), p. 082.doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)082. arXiv:2307.13745 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Spectrum of D = 6, N=4b supergravity on AdS in three-dimensions x S**3

    S. Deger et al. “Spectrum of D = 6, N=4b supergravity on AdS in three-dimensions x S**3”. In:Nucl. Phys. B536 (1998), pp. 110–140.doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00555-0. arXiv:hep-th/9804166

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  40. [40]

    The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory

    Sidney R. Coleman. “The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory”. In:Phys. Rev. D15 (1977). [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 16, 1248 (1977)], pp. 2929–2936.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.16.1248

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.16.1248 1977

  41. [41]

    The Fate of the False Vacuum. 2. First Quantum Corrections

    Curtis G. Callan Jr. and Sidney R. Coleman. “The Fate of the False Vacuum. 2. First Quantum Corrections”. In:Phys. Rev. D16 (1977), pp. 1762–1768.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.16.1762

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.16.1762 1977

  42. [42]

    Gravitational Effects on and of Vacuum Decay

    Sidney R. Coleman and Frank De Luccia. “Gravitational Effects on and of Vacuum Decay”. In:Phys. Rev. D21 (1980), p. 3305.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.21.3305

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.21.3305 1980

  43. [43]

    Neutralization of the Cosmological Constant by Membrane Cre- ation

    J. David Brown and C. Teitelboim. “Neutralization of the Cosmological Constant by Membrane Cre- ation”. In:Nucl. Phys. B297 (1988), pp. 787–836.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90559-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90559-7 1988

  44. [44]

    Brane annihilation in non-supersymmetric strings

    Riccardo Antonelli and Ivano Basile. “Brane annihilation in non-supersymmetric strings”. In:JHEP 11 (2019), p. 021.doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2019)021. arXiv:1908.04352 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    Quantization of four form fluxes and dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant

    Raphael Bousso and Joseph Polchinski. “Quantization of four form fluxes and dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant”. In:JHEP06 (2000), p. 006.doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2000/06/006. arXiv:hep-th/0004134

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  46. [46]

    Giant Leaps and Minimal Branes in Multi-Dimensional Flux Landscapes

    Adam R. Brown and Alex Dahlen. “Giant Leaps and Minimal Branes in Multi-Dimensional Flux Landscapes”. In:Phys. Rev. D84 (2011), p. 023513.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevD . 84 . 023513. arXiv: 1010.5241 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  47. [47]

    I (Modern Birkh¨ auser classics)

    David Mumford and C Musili.Tata lectures on theta. I (Modern Birkh¨ auser classics). Birkh¨ auser Boston Incorporated, 2007

    2007

  48. [48]

    A Note on Toroidal Compactification of Heterotic String Theory

    K. S. Narain, M. H. Sarmadi, and Edward Witten. “A Note on Toroidal Compactification of Heterotic String Theory”. In:Nucl. Phys. B279 (1987), pp. 369–379.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90001-0. 26

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90001-0 1987